TBP-TAF Complexes Research Articles

A novel TBP-TAF complex on RNA Polymerase II-transcribed snRNA genes

Initiation of transcription of most human genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) requires the formation of a preinitiation complex comprising TFIIA, B, D, E, F, H and RNAP II. The general transcription factor TFIID is composed of the TATA-binding protein and up to 13 TBP-associated factors. During transcription of snRNA genes, RNAP II does not appear to make the transition to long-range productive elongation, as happens during transcription of protein-coding genes. In addition, recognition of the snRNA gene-type specific 3′ box RNA processing element requires initiation from an snRNA gene promoter. These characteristics may, at least in part, be driven by factors recruited to the promoter. For example, differences in the complement of TAFs might result in differential recruitment of elongation and RNA processing factors. As precedent, it already has been shown that the promoters of some protein-coding genes do not recruit all the TAFs found in TFIID. Although TAF5 has been shown to be associated with RNAP II-transcribed snRNA genes, the full complement of TAFs associated with these genes has remained unclear. Here we show, using a ChIP and siRNA-mediated approach, that the TBP/TAF complex on snRNA genes differs from that found on protein-coding genes. Interestingly, the largest TAF, TAF1, and the core TAFs, TAF10 and TAF4, are not detected on snRNA genes. We propose that this snRNA gene-specific TAF subset plays a key role in gene type-specific control of expression.

TAF12 Recruits Gadd45a and the Nucleotide Excision Repair Complex to the Promoter of rRNA Genes Leading to Active DNA Demethylation

Many studies have detailed the repressive effects of DNA methylation on gene expression. However, the mechanisms that promote active demethylation are just beginning to emerge. Here, we show that methylation of the rDNA promoter is a dynamic and reversible process. Demethylation of rDNA is initiated by recruitment of Gadd45a (growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein 45 alpha) to the rDNA promoter by TAF12, a TBP-associated factor that is contained in Pol I- and Pol II-specific TBP-TAF complexes. Once targeted to rDNA, Gadd45a triggers demethylation of promoter-proximal DNA by recruiting the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery to remove methylated cytosines. Knockdown of Gadd45a, XPA, XPG, XPF, or TAF12 or treatment with drugs that inhibit NER causes hypermethylation of rDNA, establishes heterochromatic histone marks, and impairs transcription. The results reveal a mechanism that recruits the DNA repair machinery to the promoter of active genes, keeping them in a hypomethylated state.

TBP-TAF Complex SL1 Directs RNA Polymerase I Pre-initiation Complex Formation and Stabilizes Upstream Binding Factor at the rDNA Promoter

Knowledge of the role of components of the RNA polymerase I transcription machinery is paramount to understanding regulation of rDNA expression. We describe key findings for the roles of essential transcription factor SL1 and activator upstream binding factor (UBF). We demonstrate that human SL1 can direct accurate Pol I transcription in the absence of UBF and can interact with the rDNA promoter independently and stably, consistent with studies of rodent SL1 but contrary to previous reports of human SL1. UBF itself does not bind stably to rDNA but rapidly associates and dissociates. We show that SL1 significantly reduces the rate of dissociation of UBF from the rDNA promoter. Our findings challenge the idea that UBF activates transcription through recruitment of SL1 at the rDNA promoter and suggest that the rate of pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation is primarily determined by the rate of association of SL1, rather than UBF, with the promoter. Therefore, we propose that SL1 directs PIC formation, functioning in core promoter binding, RNA polymerase I recruitment, and UBF stabilization and that SL1-promoter complex formation is a necessary prerequisite to the assembly of functional and stable PICs that include the UBF activator in mammalian cells.

Discovery of over-expressed genes and genetic alterations in breast cancer cells using a combination of suppression subtractive hybridization, multiplex FISH and comparative genomic hybridization

To identify genes that are involved in breast cancer, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) was utilized to construct a breast cancer subtracted library. Differential screening of the library isolated 28 genes which by Northern analysis were highly expressed in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 compared to the normal breast cell line MCF12A. Sequence analysis revealed that 15 clones coded for previously described genes such as SNAP43, Cyr61, Thymosin beta4, tra1, elongation factor 1alpha, BSF-2/IL6, BiP, and GDP/GTP exchange protein. The remaining 13 clones did not match sequences in GenBank/EMBL database, indicating that they may be novel genes. SNAP43, a subunit of the TBP-TAF complex, was expressed 20-fold higher in MDA-MB-231 compared to MCF12A and several breast cancer cell lines, implying that SNAP43 may be involved in tumorigenesis of a specific subset of breast cancers. Amplification of SNAP43 was not found by Southern analysis. However, genetic alterations of MDA-MB-231 included a deletion of chromosome 14 with a reciprocal translocation t(6;14) and two additional translocations [t(12;14) and t(14;15)] as determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with YAC 823G8 located at chromosome 14q23 which contained SNAP43. Because of the numerous alterations observed by FISH in MDA-MB-231, we further explored the genetic abnormalities in this breast cancer cell line using multiplex FISH (M-FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). These cells were replete with numerous complex structural rearrangements and had DNA copy-number imbalances involving multiple chromosomes including gains on chromosomes 2p, 2q31-q32, 3p14-pter, 5q, 6p, 7q36-qter, 11, 14q21-q24, 17p11.2-pter, 17q21-qter, 19, 20, Xp11-q13 and losses on chromosomes 4pter-q32, 8p, 9p21-p24, 10q26-qter, 16p13-pter, 18q12-qter, 22, Xp11.3-p22.1, Xq13-qter. In summary, SSH revealed a number of genes that were either novel or previously not associated with breast cancer. In addition, we found that breast cancer cells abounded with abnormalities as observed by M-FISH and CGH. Together, these results may facilitate defining the genetic alterations associated with breast cancer progression.

TBP dynamics in living human cells: constitutive association of TBP with mitotic chromosomes.

The recruitment of TATA binding protein (TBP) to gene promoters is a critical rate-limiting step in transcriptional regulation for all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. However, little is known regarding the dynamics of TBP in live mammalian cells. In this report, we examined the distribution and dynamic behavior of green fluorescence protein (GFP)-tagged TBP in live HeLa cells using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analyses. We observed that GFP-TBP associates with condensed chromosomes throughout mitosis without any FRAP. These results suggest that TBP stably associates with the condensed chromosomes during mitosis. In addition, endogenous TBP and TBP-associated factors (TAFs), specific for RNA polymerase II and III transcription, cofractionated with mitotic chromatin, suggesting that TBP is retained as a TBP-TAF complex on transcriptionally silent chromatin throughout mitosis. In interphase cells, GFP-TBP distributes throughout the nucleoplasm and shows a FRAP that is 100-fold slower than the general transcription factor GFP-TFIIB. This difference supports the idea that TBP and, most likely, TBP-TAF complexes, remain promoter- bound for multiple rounds of transcription. Altogether, our observations demonstrate that there are cell cycle specific characteristics in the dynamic behavior of TBP. We propose a novel model in which the association of TBP-TAF complexes with chromatin during mitosis marks genes for rapid transcriptional activation as cells emerge from mitosis.

Functional interaction of HCMV immediate-early 2 protein and hTAFII130/135

RNA polymerases I, II, and III require the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to initiate promoter-specific transcription. We have separated HeLa TBP into four phosphocellulose fractions that elicit polymerase specificity in supplying TBP activity to TBP-depleted pol II and pol III transcription reactions. Polymerase specificity might arise in part through distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs), which have recently been identified in pol I and II transcription. However, the requirement for pol III TAFs has not been established. Here we show that classical pol III transcription involves a minimum of two novel TAFs: TAF-172 and TAF-L. Not only does TAF-172 activate pol III transcription, but it also inhibits the binding of TBP to the TATA box, thereby repressing pol II transcription. The TBP-TAF-172-TAF-L complex can replace TFIIIB both in transcription reactions reconstituted with TFIIIC and in template commitment assays. Thus SL1, TFIID, and TFIIIB might be functionally similar TBP-TAF complexes that direct pol I, II, and III transcription, respectively.

Cloning and biochemical characterization of TAF-172, a human homolog of yeast Mot1.

The TATA binding protein (TBP) is a central component of the eukaryotic transcriptional machinery and is the target of positive and negative transcriptional regulators. Here we describe the cloning and biochemical characterization of an abundant human TBP-associated factor (TAF-172) which is homologous to the yeast Mot1 protein and a member of the larger Snf2/Swi2 family of DNA-targeted ATPases. Like Mot1, TAF-172 binds to the conserved core of TBP and uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to dissociate TBP from DNA (ADI activity). Interestingly, ATP also causes TAF-172 to dissociate from TBP, which has not been previously observed with Mot1. Unlike Mot1, TAF-172 requires both TBP and DNA for maximal (approximately 100-fold) ATPase activation. TAF-172 inhibits TBP-driven RNA polymerase II and III transcription but does not appear to affect transcription driven by TBP-TAF complexes. As it does with Mot1, TFIIA reverses TAF-172-mediated repression of TBP. Together, these findings suggest that human TAF-172 is the functional homolog of yeast Mot1 and uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to remove TBP (but apparently not TBP-TAF complexes) from DNA.

SV40 large T antigen binds to the TBP-TAF(I) complex SL1 and coactivates ribosomal RNA transcription.

SV40 large T antigen is a multifunctional regulatory protein that plays a key role in the viral life cycle and can stimulate cell proliferation. To accomplish this, large T antigen has to control the expression of cellular genes involved in cell cycle progression and cell growth. rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is tightly associated with cell growth and proliferation, and previous studies indicated that large T antigen up-regulates RNA Pol I transcription in SV40-infected cells. How this process occurs is currently unclear. To investigate the mechanisms of large T antigen stimulation of RNA Pol I transcription, we have established an in vitro transcription system that is responsive to large T antigen. Here, we show that recombinant large T antigen stimulates Pol I transcription reconstituted with purified RNA Pol I, UBF, and the TBP/TAF complex SL1. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that large T antigen directly binds to SL1, in vitro, as well as in SV40-infected cells. In addition, our data indicate that this interaction occurs by direct association with three SL1 subunits, namely TBP, TAF(I)48, and TAF(I)110. Transcription studies with large T antigen deletion mutants show that the 538-amino-acid amino-terminal domain is necessary for full stimulation of Pol I transcription. Importantly, mutants that no longer bind to SL1 are also unable to stimulate Pol I transcription. This indicates that recruitment of large T antigen to the rRNA promoter by SL1 constitutes a crucial step in the activation process. Taken together with recent studies on large T antigen activation of RNA Pol II transcription, these results suggest that viral modulation of genes involved in cell proliferation involves direct targeting of promoter-specific TBP/TAF complexes (i.e., SL1 or TFIID) by large T antigen.

Species Specificity of Ribosomal Gene Transcription: A Factor Associated with Human RNA Polymerase I Prevents Transcription of Mouse rDNA

An intrinsic property of class I gene transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is the species specificity of the initiation reaction. Previous studies have demonstrated that species-specific rDNA promoter recognition is brought about by a TBP-TAF complex, termed TIF-IB in mouse and SL1 in man. We have compared the ability of affinity-purified TIF-IB and SL1 to direct transcription from the homologous rDNA template both in a reconstituted transcription system and in nuclear extracts prepared from mouse and human cells. We show that Pol I from both species and the individual transcription factors, with the exception of TIF-IB/SL1, are functionally interchangeable in the reconstituted transcription system containing purified proteins. In nuclear extracts, however, species-specific differences are obvious. Whereas SL1 reprograms a heterologous mouse extract to recognize the human promoter, TIF-IB fails to reprogram a human extract unless it is complemented with mouse Pol I. Crude human, but not mouse, Pol I exhibits species-specific differences that disappear after purification. We propose that in extracts and less purified fractions human Pol I exists as 'holoenzyme' containing associated protein(s) that prevent assembly of TIF-IB-directed initiation complexes at the murine rDNA promoter.

TAFs and TFIIA mediate differential utilization of the tandem Adh promoters

The D. melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase ( Adh) gene is transcribed from two tandem promoters that are differentially utilized at various stages during development. To determine the mechanism of promoter selectivity, we have analyzed the activity of the Adh promoters both in vitro and in transfected cells. We found that selective promoter utilization is controlled by distinct initiator elements. Reconstitution of Adh transcription with purified components requires a specific TBP-TAF complex that, in concert with TFIIA, directs differential Adh promoter transcription. Fractionation of this TBP-TAF complex reveals that TAF II 150 is required for discrimination between the proximal and distal promoters. We propose a mechanism for regulating differential promoter utilization during Drosophila development that involves the recognition of specific initiator elements by TAFs in the TFIID complex.

A TBP-TAF complex required for transcription of human snRNA genes by RNA polymerase II and III.

The TATA-box-binding protein TBP exists in the cell complexed with different sets of TBP-associated factors (TAFs). In general, each of these TBP-TAF complexes is dedicated to transcription by a single RNA polymerase. Thus, SL1, TFIID and TFIIIB are required for transcription by polymerases I, II and III, respectively. Here we characterize a fourth TBP-TAF complex called SNAPc. Unlike the other TBP-TAF complexes, SNAPc is implicated in transcription by two types of polymerases; it is required for transcription of both the RNA polymerase II and III small-nuclear RNA genes and binds specifically to the proximal sequence element PSE, a non-TATA-box basal promoter element common to these two types of genes. In addition to TBP, SNAPc is composed of at least three TAFs, SNAP43, SNAP45 and SNAP50. The predicted amino-acid sequence of SNAP43 reveals that it corresponds to a new protein.

Reconstitution of transcription factor SL1: exclusive binding of TBP by SL1 or TFIID subunits.

RNA polymerase I and II transcription factors SL1 and TFIID, respectively, are composed of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and a set of TBP-associated factors (TAFs) responsible for promoter recognition. How the universal transcription factor TBP becomes committed to a TFIID or SL1 complex has not been known. Complementary DNAs encoding each of the three TAFIs that are integral components of SL1 have not been isolated. Analysis of subunit interactions indicated that the three TAFIs can bind individually and specifically to TBP. In addition, these TAFIs interact with each other to form a stable TBP-TAF complex. When TBP was bound first by either TAFI110, 63, or 48, subunits of TFIID such as TAFII250 and 150 did not bind TBP. Conversely, if TBP first formed a complex with TAFII250 or 150, the subunits of SL1 did not bind TBP. These results suggest that a mutually exclusive binding specificity for TBP intrinsic to SL1 and TFIID subunits directs the formation of promoter- and RNA polymerase-selective TBP-TAF complexes.

Yeast Taf170 is encoded by MOT1 and exists in a TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-TBP-associated factor complex distinct from transcription factor IID.

Our characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TATA box-binding protein (TBP) has led to the identification of nine specific yeast TBP-associated factors (TAFs) ranging in size from 170 to 25 kDa. The amino acid sequence derived from a purified TAF with an apparent M(r) of 170,000 indicates that yeast Taf170 is encoded by the essential yeast gene MOT1. We describe in this report a series of experiments that demonstrate that the protein encoded by MOT1 is a bona fide yeast TAF and that Taf170 forms a separate complex with TBP distinct from the RNA polymerase II-specific multisubunit transcription factor IID TBP-TAF complex. The significance of this unique TBP-Taf170 complex regarding transcriptional regulation is discussed.

The conserved core domain of the human TATA binding protein is sufficient to assemble the multisubunit RNA polymerase I-specific transcription factor SL1.

The human ribosomal RNA polymerase (Pol) I promoter selectivity factor SL1 is a complex consisting of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and three TBP-associated factors (TAFs). We have investigated which elements of TBP are involved in the assembly of Pol I-specific TBP-TAF complexes by comparing SL1 isolated from two human cell lines, one expressing epitope-tagged full-length TBP and another expressing a deletion of nearly the entire N-terminal domain (e delta NTBP). We have immunopurified epitope-tagged full-length TBP- and e delta NTBP-TAF complexes and show that e delta NTBP reconstitutes SL1 activity almost as well as full-length TBP. Moreover, e delta NTBP is shown to be associated with all three Pol I-specific TAFs. Thus, the core of TBP alone is sufficient for the correct assembly of the Pol I-specific TBP-TAF complex, and the variable N-terminal region of human TBP is not required for transcriptional activity. We also demonstrate by an in vitro protein-protein interaction assay that TBP directly interacts with the smallest TAF, TAFI48.

TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription.

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription.

Transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This protein functions in association with distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs) which may specify the nature of the polymerase selected for initiation at a promoter site. In the pol III transcription system, the TBP-TAF complex is a component of the TFIIIB factor. This factor has been resolved into a TBP-TAF complex and another component, both of which are required for reconstitution of transcription by pol III. Neither the TBP-TAF complexes B-TFIID and D-TFIID, which were previously characterized as active for pol II transcription, nor TBP alone can complement pol III transcription reactions that are dependent upon the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB. Surprisingly, the TBP-TAF subcomponent of TFIIIB is active in reconstitution of pol II transcription.

The TATA-binding protein and associated factors are components of pol III transcription factor TFIIIB

RNA polymerases I, II, and III require the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to initiate promoter-specific transcription. We have separated HeLa TBP into four phosphocellulose fractions that elicit polymerase specificity in supplying TBP activity to TBP-depleted pol II and pol III transcription reactions. Polymerase specificity might arise in part through distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs), which have recently been identified in pol I and II transcription. However, the requirement for pol III TAFs has not been established. Here we show that classical pol III transcription involves a minimum of two novel TAFs: TAF-172 and TAF-L. Not only does TAF-172 activate pol III transcription, but it also inhibits the binding of TBP to the TATA box, thereby repressing pol II transcription. The TBP-TAF-172-TAF-L complex can replace TFIIIB both in transcription reactions reconstituted with TFIIIC and in template commitment assays. Thus SL1, TFIID, and TFIIIB might be functionally similar TBP-TAF complexes that direct pol I, II, and III transcription, respectively.

Multiple domains of the RNA polymerase I activator hUBF interact with the TATA-binding protein complex hSL1 to mediate transcription.

Recent evidence suggests that transcription initiation by all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases involves a complex of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and multiple TBP-associated factors (TAFs). Here, we map the functional domains of the nucleolar HMG box protein hUBF, which binds to the human rRNA promoter and stimulates transcription by RNA polymerase I through cooperative interactions with a distinct TBP-TAF complex, hSL1. DNase I footprint analysis of mutant hUBF proteins and of a synthetic peptide of 84 amino acids reveals that HMG box 1 is necessary and sufficient for DNA sequence specificity, whereas other HMG boxes and the amino terminus modulate the binding efficiency. hUBF contains multiple activation domains that include the acidic carboxyl terminus and three HMG boxes. HMG boxes 3 and 4 and the acidic tail contribute significantly to an extended footprinting pattern in the presence of hSL1, suggestive of specific protein-protein interactions. Moreover, the inability of xUBF from Xenopus laevis to form an initiation complex with hSL1 can be overcome by hybrid proteins containing human HMG box 4 and the acidic carboxyl terminus. These results strongly suggest an important role of transcription activation domains of hUBF in mediating interactions with the TBP-TAF complex hSL1.

Cofractionation of the TATA-binding protein with the RNA polymerase III transcription factor TFIIIB.

We have investigated the requirement for TBP (TATA-binding protein) in transcription mediated by RNA polymerase III (pol III) in fractionated HeLa cell extracts. Two activities, TFIIIB and TFIIIC, found in phosphocellulose fractions PC B and PC C respectively, have been defined as necessary and sufficient, with pol III, for in vitro transcription of tRNA genes. Depletion of TBP from PC B, using antibodies raised against human TBP, is shown to inhibit the pol III transcriptional activity of the fraction. Furthermore, TBP is present in fractions with human TFIIIB activity, and a proportion of TBP cofractionates with TFIIIB over four chromatographic purification steps. TFIIIB fractions are capable of supplying TBP in the form necessary for pol III transcription, and cannot be substituted by fractions containing other TBP complexes or TBP alone. The use of a 5S RNA gene and two tRNA templates supports the general relevance of our findings for pol III gene transcription. Purified TFIIIB activity can also support pol II-mediated transcription, and is found in a complex of approximately 230kD, suggesting that TFIIIB may be the same as the previously characterized B-TFIID complex (1,2). We suggest that transcription by the three RNA polymerases is mediated by distinct TBP-TAF complexes: SL1 and D-TFIID for pol I and pol II respectively, and TFIIIB for pol III.