Taxane-pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Taxanes are the basic components of breast cancer chemotherapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) shows improved antitumor effects because of more targeted delivery. However, the effects of nab-paclitaxel have not been systematically studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with taxanes. Considering the limited treatment options for MBC, this study retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of nab-paclitaxel in patients with taxane-pretreated MBC. Patients who had previously received taxanes and subsequently received nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy for MBC at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between October 2014 and April 2022 were included for analysis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and side effects. A total of 236 female patients with MBC were included. The median PFS was 7.20months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.63-7.80months), and the ORR, DCR, and CBR were 29.55% (95% CI, 23.50%-35.60%), 83.64% (95% CI, 78.70%-88.60%), and 56.36% (95% CI, 49.80%-63.00%), respectively. Following nab-paclitaxel treatment, the median PFS of patients who were sensitive to taxanes during previous treatments was significantly longer than that of patients who were resistant to taxanes (7.57months vs. 4.43months, p<.001). The most common adverse events were sensory neuropathy (89.83%), neutropenia (48.73%), leukopenia (46.61%), and anemia (35.59%). Nab-paclitaxel demonstrated clinical activity in taxane-pretreated patients with MBC. This beneficial effect was observed both in patients who were sensitive and resistant to taxanes during previous treatments. These results suggest nab-paclitaxel as the preferred chemotherapy regimen in patients with MBC, regardless of their sensitivity to taxanes during previous treatments.

A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials.

Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69–3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients.

Characterization of Durable Responder for Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients With Anthracycline- and Taxane-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate predictive factors and the clinical characteristics of durable responders to capecitabine monotherapy in heavily-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and MethodsBetween December 2000 and May 2012, a total of 236 evaluable patients with MBC who had been treated with second- or greater-line palliative capecitabine monotherapy after a previous treatment regimen with anthracycline and taxane were included. Capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily) was administered for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. ResultsThe response rate was 23.3% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval, 4.0-5.5). Among 236 patients, 33 patients (14.0%) showed durable response (>12 months) to capecitabine monotherapy. Patients with durable response showed significantly greater incidence of estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (81.8% vs. 59.1%; P = .012), single-organ metastasis (51.5% vs. 32.0%; P = .047), and absence of lymph node metastasis (75.8% vs. 54.2%; P = .023), compared with patients without durable response. In multivariate analysis, ER positivity and single-organ metastasis retained a significant association with better PFS to capecitabine monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; P < .001 and HR, 0.62; P = .004). ConclusionOur data suggest that ER positivity and single-organ metastasis can be useful predictive markers for better PFS to second- or greater-line palliative capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as second-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative, taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients: prospective evaluation of activity, safety, and quality of life

BackgroundA prospective, multicenter trial was undertaken to assess the activity, safety, and quality of life of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as second-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative, taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and methodsFifty-two women with HER2-negative MBC who were candidates for second-line chemotherapy for the metastatic disease were enrolled and treated at three centers in Northern Italy. All patients had previously received taxane-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant or first-line metastatic setting. Single-agent nab-paclitaxel was given at the dose of 260 mg/m2 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 each treatment cycle, which lasted 3 weeks, in the outpatient setting. No steroid or antihistamine premedication was provided. Treatment was stopped for documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal.ResultsAll of the enrolled patients were evaluable for the study endpoints. The objective response rate was 48% (95% CI, 31.5%–61.3%) and included complete responses from 13.5%. Disease stabilization was obtained in 19 patients and lasted >6 months in 15 of them; the overall clinical benefit rate was 77%. The median time to response was 70 days (range 52–86 days). The median progression-free survival time was 8.9 months (95% CI, 8.0–11.6 months, range 5–21+ months). The median overall survival point has not yet been reached. Toxicities were expected and manageable with good patient compliance and preserved quality of life in patients given long-term treatment.ConclusionOur results showed that single-agent nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is an effective and well tolerated regimen as second-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative, taxane-pretreated MBC patients, and that it produced interesting values of objective response rate and progression-free survival without the concern of significant toxicity. Specifically, the present study shows that such a regimen is a valid therapeutic option for that ‘difficult to treat’ patient population represented by women who at the time of disease relapse have already received the most active agents in the adjuvant and/or metastatic setting (ie, conventional taxanes).

Abstract OT3-1-08: The PROCEED trial KCSG BR11-01: Phase III multicenter randomized open label study of irinotecan plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Most patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience disease progression after being treated with an anthracycline or taxane. Irinotecan, a semisynthetic agent derived from the natural alkaloid camptothecin is metabolized to the active metabolite SN-38 which targets topoisomerase I leading to single and double strand DNA breaks. Irinotecan as a single agent demonstrated tumor activity with an objective response rate ranging from 5 to 23% in patients with MBC refractory to taxane and anthracycline. Irinotecan increased the activity of 5-FU, the active metabolite of capecitabine, and overcomes the negative effect of thymidylate synthase overexpression, which is the main target of an active metabolite of 5-FU. A phase II study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan and capecitabin combination (IX) showed that the median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.2months), and the median OS was 22.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 – 29.8 months) with good tolerability in anthracycline and taxane pretreated MBC patients. Based on these results, we planned to conduct a multicenter, randomized phase III study which assesses the efficacy of irinotecan and capecitabine combination therapy compared with capecitabine alone in patients with anthracycline and taxane resistant MBC. Methods: In this trial, patients with HER2 normal tumor who previously received anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapies are enrolled. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive irinotecan plus capecitabine or capecitabine alone. The primary end point of this trial is PFS and a total number of accrual patients will be 222. Randomization is done using a random block size permutation method and stratified by hormone receptor status (negative vs. positive), first line vs. ≥second lines, visceral metastasis (negative vs. positive). Patients receive irinotecan at 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid from day 1 to day 14 every 3 weeks. In control arm, patients receive capecitabine 1250mg/m2 bid from day 1 to day 14 every 3 weeks. Response will be assessed using RECIST1.1 criteria and toxicity will be graded according to NCI-CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Study Status: A total of 107 patients consented for the study since June 2011, and accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01501669. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-1-08.

IS2-5 - Phase II Trial of TS-1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane Chemotherapy [TORCH] [Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) BR07-03

ABSTRACT Background Oxaliplatin, a platinum analogue, is an active drug in advanced anthracycline and taxane-pretreated breast cancer patients as a single agent and with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination. TS-1 was developed by the scientific theory of both potentiating antitumor activity of 5-FU and reducing gastrointestinal toxicity. This trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TS-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) chemotherapy (CTx). Methods Between October 2007 and October 2009, MBC patients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter trial. Eligible criteria included age >18 years, at least one measurable lesion, prior treatment with A and T CTx, and ECOG PS 0-2. TS-1 40 mg/m2 bid on D1-14 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on D1 were administered every 3 weeks till disease progression. Primary end-point was response rate (RR), and secondary end-points were time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and toxic effects. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks according to the RECIST criteria v.1.0 and toxicity was assessed with NCICTCAE v.3.0. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00527930.) Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. Median age was 48 (range 30–71) years. Nineteen patients (21.8%) had de novo stage IV and 68 patients (78.2%) had recurrent disease. Forty-eight patients (55.2%) had ≥3 disease sites. Fifty-four patients (62.1%) were hormone receptor positive, and 25 patients (28.7%) were triple negative. Five patients received prior anti-HER2 therapy. A total of 525 cycles were administered (median 6, range: 1–22+ cycle). In per-protocol analysis, the overall RR was 38.5% (CR 0%, PR 38.5%) and the disease control rate (CR, PR, and SD) was 67.9%. Median TTP, OS, and DOR were 6.0, 19.4, 6.6 months, respectively. The RR did not differ by triple negativity (39.1% in TNBC versus 38.2% in non-TNBC, P = 0.361). Reported grade 3 or 4 toxic effects (per cycle) were neutropenia (10.3%), thrombocytopenia (5.5%), diarrhea (1.9%), vomiting (1.9%), and stomatitis (0.2%). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions SOX is an effective regimen in anthracycline and taxane pretreated MBC patients with manageable toxic effects.

P3-16-06: Phase II Trial of TS-1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane Chemotherapy [TORCH] [Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) BR07-03

Abstract Background Oxaliplatin, a platinum analogue, is an active drug in advanced anthracycline and taxane-pretreated breast cancer patients as a single agent and with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination. TS-1 was developed by the scientific theory of both potentiating antitumor activity of 5-FU and reducing gastrointestinal toxicity. This trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TS-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. Methods: Between October 2007 and October 2009, MBC patients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter trial. Eligible criteria included age ≥18 years, at least one measurable lesion, prior treatment with anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy, and ECOG Performance Status 0–2. TS-1 40 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 were administered every 3 weeks till disease progression. Primary end-point was response rate, and secondary end-points were time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and toxicities. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks according to the RECIST criteria v. 1.0 and toxicity was assessed with NCICTCAE v.3.0.(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00527930). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled. Median age was 48 years (range 30–71 years). Nineteen patients (21.8%) had de novo stage IV and 68 patients (78.2%) had recurrent disease. Thirty-five patients (40.2%) received two-lines of prior chemotherapy in palliative setting. Forty-eight patients (55.2%) had ≥ 3 disease sites. Fifty-four patients (62.1%) were hormone receptor positive, and 25 patients (28.7%) were triple negative. Five patients received prior anti-HER2 therapy. A total of 525 cycles were administered (median 6 cycles, range: 1 ∼ 22+ cycle). In per-protocol analysis, overall response rate was 38.5% (95% CI: 27.7−49.3) (CR 0%, PR 38.5%) and disease control rate (CR, PR, and SD) was 67.9% (95% CI: 57.5−78.3). Median TTP, OS, and DOR were 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.1−6.9 months), 19.4 months (95% CI: not estimated), 6.6 months (95% CI: 3.7−9.6 months), respectively. RR was not different by triple negativity (39.1% in TNBC vs. 38.2% in non-TNBC, P=0.361). TTP was not different according to the number of prior chemotherapy regimens. Reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities (per cycle) were neutropenia (10.3%), thrombocytopenia (5.5%), diarrhea (1.9%), vomiting (1.9%), and stomatitis (0.2%). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: SOX is an effective regimen in anthracycline and taxane pretreated MBC patients with manageable toxicities. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-06.

Capecitabine and Cisplatin Combination Is an Active and Well-Tolerated Doublet in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma Patients Pretreated with Anthracycline and Taxanes

Our aim was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of capecitabine and cisplatin (CapCisp) combination in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Thirty-three patients, 20–61 years of age (median 41), were included. They received Cap 2,000 mg/m² on days 1–14 and Cisp 60 mg/m² on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Twelve nonprogressive patients continued single-agent Cap therapy until progression or until intolerable toxicity after Cisp cessation. The disease control rate in 154 cycles was 81.8%: complete response 3.0% (n = 1), partial response 48.5% (n = 16) and stable disease 30.3% (n = 10). The median time to disease progression was 6.3 months (95% CI 3.8–8.8). The median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 6.9–16.1). The only grade 3 toxicity was neutropenia, observed in 4 patients (12.1%). CapCisp has an encouraging anti-tumor activity with a low toxicity rate in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Combination Chemotherapy in Anthracycline- and Taxane-pretreated Advanced Breast Cancer

Anthracycline and taxanes are effective agents in advanced breast cancer and prolong survival times. Some patients achieve prolongation of life with capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine, even after failure of both anthracycline and taxanes. We analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated advanced breast cancer. The medical records of anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients who received gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy at the Seoul National University Hospital were reviewed. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Between 2000 and 2006, 57 patients were eligible (median age, 45 years), and the median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range, 1 approximately 5). The overall response rate was 30% (95% CI, 18.1 approximately 41.9), and the disease control rate was 46% (PR, 30%; SD, 16%). The median duration of follow-up was 33.4 months, the median time-to-progression (TTP) was 3.9 months, and the median overall survival was 10.8 months. None of the patients with patients with anthracycline and taxane primary resistance showed a response and the median TTP for these patients was significantly shorter than that of other patients (1.9 vs. 4.4 months; p=0.018). Although the efficacy was unsatisfactory in patients with both anthracycline and taxane primary resistance, gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy showed comparable efficacy in anthracycline- and/or taxane-sensitive patients and the patients with secondary resistance, even after failure of second-line therapy. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (18.1%) and febrile neutropenia (0.3%), and non-hematologic toxicities were tolerable. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated advanced breast cancer was effective and tolerable.

A phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil combination in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil (FON) combination in anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The following treatment was given: on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (2-h intravenous infusion); on days 1 and 5, vinorelbine [dose level (DL) 1: 17.5 mg/m; DL2: 22 mg/m]; on days 1-5, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (DL1: 600 mg/m/day; DL2: 750 mg/m/day). Forty-seven patients were treated (DL1: 43; DL2: 4). Median age was 54 years; 68% had liver metastases, 53% were taxane refractory/resistant and 38% were anthracycline refractory/resistant. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles. Of 46 eligible patients, 16 had partial response; the overall response rate was 34.8% (95% confidence interval 21.3-50.3%), 11 had stable disease lasting more than 4 months. Median follow-up was 13.0 months, median time to progression 5.7 months and estimated overall survival 18.8 months. DL2 was too toxic with three patients having grade 3-4 toxicity, including one death. At DL1, 26 patients (60%) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (six febrile neutropenia) and eight had grade 3 oxaliplatin-specific peripheral neuropathy after a median of 646.4 mg/m oxaliplatin (range 124-1619 mg/m). Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m, day 1)/vinorelbine (17.5 mg/m, days 1,5)/5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m/day, days 1-5) demonstrate encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Fifty anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles. The median age was 51 years (range 34-75). Twenty patients (40%) had received three or more chemotherapeutic regimens, 64% had three or four metastatic sites and 78% had visceral metastases. All patients had prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, one patient (2%) achieved a complete response and 16 (32%) a partial response, for a 34% overall response rate. Twenty-one patients (42%) had stable disease and 12 (24%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression was 5.3 months (range 0.5-12.8) and the median overall survival was 12.3 months (range 0.5-19.2). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32% and 18%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by three patients (6%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was reported in 14% of the patients and gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Cycle delays were reported in 28% of patients and dose reductions in 26%. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis were not significant. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV seems to be an active regimen in patients with MBC and prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes with a good safety profile. The incidence of severe toxicity was quite low and the compliance of patients to the treatment was satisfactory. The results obtained with this regimen could be considered encouraging in this heavily pretreated group of breast cancer patients with a high incidence of visceral metastases.