Targeting Chemokine Receptors Research Articles

Long-term CXCR3 antagonist AMG487 mitigated acute graft-versus-host disease by inhibiting T cell activation in a murine model

BackgroundLymphocyte migration plays a key role in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Blocking lymphocyte migration by targeting chemokine receptors, such as CXCR3, may be a promising strategy for preventing and treating aGVHD. Our previous studies have shown that short-term CXCR3 antagonist treatment combined with cyclosporine A alleviated aGVHD. However, the effect of long-term AMG487 treatment on aGVHD survival has not been thoroughly investigated. MethodsA murine aGVHD model was used to examine the expression of CXCR3 in donor T cells. The effects of short- and long-term AMG487 treatment on aGVHD survival were assessed. The infiltration of donor T cells into the liver and spleen tissues and the activation of donor T cells in splenic tissues were also examined. ResultsCXCR3 was consistently highly expressed in donor T cells in a murine aGVHD model. Long-term AMG487 treatment, but not short-term, improved survival and aGVHD outcomes (p < 0.05). Furthermore, long-term AMG487 administration reduced the number of donor T cells in the liver but increased the number of donor T cells in the spleen (p < 0.05). Long-term AMG487 treatment also inhibited donor T cell activation in the spleen (p < 0.05). ConclusionThis study demonstrates that long-term AMG487 treatment has a potential therapeutic effect on aGVHD and could be used as a novel therapy.

Pharmacological characterization of allosteric modulators:A case for chemokine receptors.

Chemokine receptors are relevant targets for a multitude of immunological diseases, but drug attrition for these receptors is remarkably high. While many drug discovery programs have been pursued, most prospective drugs failed in the follow-up studies due to clinical inefficacy, and hence there is a clear need for alternative approaches. Allosteric modulators of receptor function represent an excellent opportunity for novel drugs, as they modulate receptor activation in a controlled manner and display increased selectivity, and their pharmacological profile can be insurmountable. Here, we discuss allosteric ligands and their pharmacological characterization for modulation of chemokine receptors. Ligands are included if (1) they show clear signs of allosteric modulation in vitro and (2) display evidence of binding in a topologically distinct manner compared to endogenous chemokines. We discuss how allosteric ligands affect binding of orthosteric (endogenous) ligands in terms of affinity as well as binding kinetics in radioligand binding assays. Moreover, their effects on signaling events in functional assays and how their binding site can be elucidated are specified. We substantiate this with examples of published allosteric ligands targeting chemokine receptors and hypothetical graphs of pharmacological behavior. This review should serve as an effective starting point for setting up assays for characterizing allosteric ligands to develop safer and more efficacious drugs for chemokine receptors and, ultimately, other G protein-coupled receptors.

Chemotactic signaling pathways in prostate cancer: Implications in the tumor microenvironment and as potential therapeutic targets.

Prostate cancer (PCa) stands as a significant global health concern, ranking among the leading causes of cancer deaths in men. While there are several treatment modalities for localized PCa, metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) remains incurable. Despite therapeutic advancements showing promise in mCRPC, their impact on overall survivalhas been limited. This chapter explores the process by which tumors form, reviews our current understanding of PCa progression to mCRPC, and addresses the challenges of boosting anti-tumor immune responses in these tumors. It specifically discusses how chemotactic signaling affects the tumor microenvironmentand its role in immune evasion and cancer progression. The chapter further examines the rationale of directly or indirectly targeting these pathways as adjuvant therapies for mCRPC, highlighting recent pre-clinical and clinical studies currently underway. The discussion emphasizes the potential of targeting specific chemokines and chemokine receptors as combination therapies with mainstream treatments for PCa and mCRPC to maximize long-term survival for this deadly disease.

Strategies to overcome myeloid cell induced immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment.

Cancer progression and metastasis due to tumor immune evasion and drug resistance is strongly associated with immune suppressive cellular responses, particularly in the case of metastatic tumors. The myeloid cell component plays a key role within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and disrupts both adaptive and innate immune cell responses leading to loss of tumor control. Therefore, strategies to eliminate or modulate the myeloid cell compartment of the TME are increasingly attractive to non-specifically increase anti-tumoral immunity and enhance existing immunotherapies. This review covers current strategies targeting myeloid suppressor cells in the TME to enhance anti-tumoral immunity, including strategies that target chemokine receptors to deplete selected immune suppressive myeloid cells and relieve the inhibition imposed on the effector arms of adaptive immunity. Remodeling the TME can in turn improve the activity of other immunotherapies such as checkpoint blockade and adoptive T cell therapies in immunologically "cold" tumors. When possible, in this review, we have provided evidence and outcomes from recent or current clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of the specific strategies used to target myeloid cells in the TME. The review seeks to provide a broad overview of how myeloid cell targeting can become a key foundational approach to an overall strategy for improving tumor responses to immunotherapy.

Location bias contributes to functionally selective responses of biased CXCR3 agonists

Some G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands act as “biased agonists” that preferentially activate specific signaling transducers over others. Although GPCRs are primarily found at the plasma membrane, GPCRs can traffic to and signal from many subcellular compartments. Here, we determine that differential subcellular signaling contributes to the biased signaling generated by three endogenous ligands of the GPCR CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3). The signaling profile of CXCR3 changes as it traffics from the plasma membrane to endosomes in a ligand-specific manner. Endosomal signaling is critical for biased activation of G proteins, β-arrestins, and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK). In CD8 + T cells, the chemokines promote unique transcriptional responses predicted to regulate inflammatory pathways. In a mouse model of contact hypersensitivity, β-arrestin-biased CXCR3-mediated inflammation is dependent on receptor internalization. Our work demonstrates that differential subcellular signaling is critical to the overall biased response observed at CXCR3, which has important implications for drugs targeting chemokine receptors and other GPCRs.

Targeting chemokine receptors signalling of immune cells in autoimmune diseases

Targeting chemokine receptors signalling of immune cells in autoimmune diseases

Molecular insights into ligand recognition and activation of chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR3

Chemokine receptors are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors with key roles in leukocyte migration and inflammatory responses. Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of two human CC chemokine receptor–G-protein complexes: CCR2 bound to its endogenous ligand CCL2, and CCR3 in the apo state. The structure of the CCL2–CCR2–G-protein complex reveals that CCL2 inserts deeply into the extracellular half of the transmembrane domain, and forms substantial interactions with the receptor through the most N-terminal glutamine. Extensive hydrophobic and polar interactions are present between both two chemokine receptors and the Gα-protein, contributing to the constitutive activity of these receptors. Notably, complemented with functional experiments, the interactions around intracellular loop 2 of the receptors are found to be conserved and play a more critical role in G-protein activation than those around intracellular loop 3. Together, our findings provide structural insights into chemokine recognition and receptor activation, shedding lights on drug design targeting chemokine receptors.

Location Bias Contributes to Functionally Selective Responses of Biased CXCR3 Agonists to Regulate Inflammation

G Protein‐Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest and most diverse family of cell receptors in the human genome and are targeted by ~35% of all FDA‐approved drugs. GPCR signaling is mediated by various effectors, including G proteins, β‐arrestins, and GPCR kinases (GRKs). Recent studies have uncovered that different ligands can bind to the same GPCR and differentially activate specific signaling pathways, a phenomenon known as biased agonism. Most research has focused on characterizing biased agonism at the plasma membrane, but GPCRs are also known to traffic to and signal from a variety of subcellular compartments. To determine if GPCR subcellular localization contributes to biased signaling, we studied how the chemokine family GPCR CXCR3 signals from endosomes following stimulation by the three endogenous ligands CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11.We determined that the biased ligands of CXCR3 promote different amounts of receptor mediated endocytosis and also show markedly different G protein and β‐arrestin signaling profiles at both the plasma membrane and the endosome. The biased activation of G proteins and β‐arrestins promotes differential activation of cytoplasmic and nuclear ERK1/2, as well as cellular transcription in both HEK293 cells and primary CD8+ T‐cells. Inhibition of receptor internalization greatly diminishes the biased signaling observed between the endogenous chemokines. Finally, we demonstrate in a murine model of contact hypersensitivity that receptor internalization is a key component of the ability of a synthetic β‐arrestin biased CXCR3 agonist to potentiate the inflammatory response. The present study shows the CXCR3 biased ligands induce unique signaling profiles at the plasma membrane and the endosome, and that signaling from endosomes greatly contributes to the overall biased responses seen at CXCR3. These results demonstrate that signaling from subcellar compartments is a critical component of GPCR signaling. Our findings have implications in the development of pharmaceutical drugs targeting chemokine receptors and other GPCRs.

Chemokines as Regulators of Neutrophils: Focus on Tumors, Therapeutic Targeting, and Immunotherapy.

Simple SummaryNeutrophils are the main leukocyte subset present in human blood and play a fundamental role in the defense against infections. Neutrophils are also an important component of the tumor stroma because they are recruited by selected chemokines produced by both cancer cells and other cells of the stroma. Even if their presence has been mostly associated with a bad prognosis, tumor-associated neutrophils are present in different maturation and activation states and can exert both protumor and antitumor activities. In addition, it is now emerging that chemokines not only induce neutrophil directional migration but also have an important role in their activation and maturation. For these reasons, chemokines and chemokine receptors are now considered targets to improve the antitumoral function of neutrophils in cancer immunotherapy.Neutrophils are an important component of the tumor microenvironment, and their infiltration has been associated with a poor prognosis for most human tumors. However, neutrophils have been shown to be endowed with both protumor and antitumor activities, reflecting their heterogeneity and plasticity in cancer. A growing body of studies has demonstrated that chemokines and chemokine receptors, which are fundamental regulators of neutrophils trafficking, can affect neutrophil maturation and effector functions. Here, we review human and mouse data suggesting that targeting chemokines or chemokine receptors can modulate neutrophil activity and improve their antitumor properties and the efficiency of immunotherapy.

Targeting chemokine receptors from the inside-out: discovery and development of small-molecule intracellular antagonists.

Ever since the first biologically active chemokines were discovered in the late 1980s, these messenger proteins and their receptors have been the target for a plethora of drug discovery efforts in the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in academia. Owing to the publication of several chemokine receptor X-ray crystal structures, a highly druggable, intracellular, allosteric binding site which partially overlaps with the G protein binding site was discovered. This intriguing, new approach for chemokine receptor antagonism has captured researchers around the world, pushing the exploration of this intracellular binding site and new antagonists thereof. In this review, we have highlighted the past two decades of research on small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonists that modulate receptor function at the intracellular binding site.

Chemokine Receptor Antagonists: Role in Oncology

To evaluate the clinical potential of chemokine receptor antagonists for the treatment of patients with cancer. Chemokine receptors and their ligands can have a significant impact on the infiltration of cells into the tumor microenvironment. The receptors are increasingly being investigated as targets for the treatment of cancers. Recent studies are demonstrating the promise of chemokine receptor antagonists in this setting. There are many chemokine receptors, and each can have different functions depending on the cellular context. Targeting chemokine receptors is a promising strategy in both pre-clinical research and clinical trials. Inhibiting chemokine receptors that either recruit suppressive cells or improve cancer mobility and viability while sparing those necessary for proper immune trafficking may prove to dramatically improve treatment responses. Further research in this area is warranted and has the potential to dramatically improve patient outcomes.

Latest update on chemokine receptors as therapeutic targets.

The chemokine system plays a fundamental role in a diverse range of physiological processes, such as homeostasis and immune responses. Dysregulation in the chemokine system has been linked to inflammatory diseases and cancer, which renders chemokine receptors to be considered as therapeutic targets. In the past two decades, around 45 drugs targeting chemokine receptors have been developed, yet only three are clinically approved. The challenging factors include the limited understanding of aberrant chemokine signalling in malignant diseases, high redundancy of the chemokine system, differences between cell types and non-specific binding of the chemokine receptor antagonists due to the broad ligand-binding pockets. In recent years, emerging studies attempt to characterise the chemokine ligand–receptor interactions and the downstream signalling protein–protein interactions, aiming to fine tuning to the promiscuous interplay of the chemokine system for the development of precision medicine. This review will outline the updates on the mechanistic insights in the chemokine system and propose some potential strategies in the future development of targeted therapy.

CCR5 tyrosine sulfation heterogeneity generates cell surface receptor subpopulations with different ligand binding properties

BackgroundChemokine receptor tyrosine sulfation plays a key role in the binding of chemokines. It has been suggested that receptor sulfation is heterogeneous, but no experimental evidence has been provided so far. The potent anti-HIV chemokine analog 5P12-RANTES has been proposed to owe its inhibitory activity to a capacity to bind a larger pool of cell surface CCR5 receptors than native chemokines such as CCL5, but the molecular details underlying this phenomenon have not been elucidated. MethodsWe investigated the CCR5 sulfation heterogeneity and the sensitivity of CCR5 ligands to receptor sulfation by performing ELISA assays on synthetic N-terminal sulfopeptides and by performing binding assays on CCR5-expressing cells under conditions that modulate CCR5 sulfation levels. ResultsTwo commonly used anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibodies with epitopes in the sulfated N-terminal domain of CCR5 show contrasting binding profiles on CCR5 sulfopeptides, incomplete competition with each other for cell surface CCR5, and opposing sensitivities to cellular treatments that affect CCR5 sulfation levels. 5P12-RANTES is less sensitive than native CCL5 to conditions that affect cellular CCR5 sulfation. ConclusionsCCR5 sulfation is heterogeneous and this affects the binding properties of both native chemokines and antibodies. Enhanced capacity to bind to CCR5 is a component of the inhibitory mechanism of 5P12-RANTES. General significanceWe provide the first experimental evidence for sulfation heterogeneity of chemokine receptors and its impact on ligand binding, a phenomenon that is important both for the understanding of chemokine cell biology and for the development of drugs that target chemokine receptors.

Targeting Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors in Multiple Sclerosis and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated and neurodegenerative disorder that results in inflammation and demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS). MS symptoms include walking difficulties, visual weakening, as well as learning and memory impairment, thus affecting the quality of the patient’s life. Chemokines and chemokine receptors are expressed on the immune cells as well as the CNS resident cells. Several sets of chemokine receptors and their ligands tend to be pathogenic players in MS, including CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL7, CCL8, CCL11, CCL17, CCL19, CCL21, CCL22, CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CXCL16. Furthermore, current modulatory drugs that are used in the treatment of MS and its animal model, the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), affect the expression of several chemokine and chemokine receptors. In this review, we highlight the pathogenic roles of chemokines and their receptors as well as utilizing them as potential therapeutic targets through selective agents, such as specific antibodies and receptor blockers, or indirectly through MS or EAE immunomodulatory drugs.

Research Advances on Chemokines and Their Receptors in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma --Review

Abstract Chemokines and their receptors play an important role in development and migration of normal immune cells. In recent years, relevant studies have shown that the expression of chemokine receptor on the surface of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cells is up-regulated, which regulates the disease's occurrence and metastasis, and influences prognosis of patients. Agents targeting chemokine receptors are under research and applied in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and anti-lymphoma therapy. A new family of atypical chemokines has been gradually discovered and shown the anti-lymphoma effect, which is potential to become a new theraputic method. In this review, the research advance of chemokines and their receptors in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is summarized.

Role of Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most prevalent autoimmune diseases and a prototypic inflammatory disease, affecting the small joints of the hands and feet. Chemokines and chemokine receptors play a critical role in RA pathogenesis via immune cells recruitment. Several chemokines and chemokine receptors are abundant in the peripheral blood and in the local inflamed joints of RA. Furthermore, synthetic and biologics disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs have been reported to affect chemokines expression. Thus, many studies have focused on targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors, where some have shown positive promising results. However, most of the chemokine blockers in human trials of RA treatment displayed some failures that can be attributed to several reasons in their structures and binding affinities. Nevertheless, targeting chemokines will continue to be under development, in order to improve their therapeutic potentials in RA and other autoimmune diseases. In this review we provide an up-to-date knowledge regarding the role of chemokines and chemokine receptors in RA with an emphasis on their activities on immune cells. We also discussed the effects of drugs targeting those molecules in RA. This knowledge might provide impetus for developing new therapeutic modalities to treat this chronic disease.

Insitu crystallography as an emerging method for structure solution of membrane proteins: the case of CCR2A.

The inmeso insitu serial X-ray crystallization method (Huang et al., (2015) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 71, 1238) combines lipid cubic phase crystallization, direct freezing of the crystallization droplet without handling of the crystals, and data collection insitu. Recently, this method was used to overcome the mechanical fragility of crystals which enabled the X-ray structure determination of chemokine receptor 2A (Apel et al., (2019) Structure 27, 427) at 2.7Å resolution. The CCR2 structure provides the structural basis for ligand selectivity of CCR2 against chemokine receptor 5 and provides insights into the residence time of MK-0812 analogs based on molecular dynamics simulations. These findings offer new opportunities for drug discovery targeting chemokine receptors.

Biased Signaling of CCL21 and CCL19 Does Not Rely on N-Terminal Differences, but Markedly on the Chemokine Core Domains and Extracellular Loop 2 of CCR7.

Chemokine receptors play important roles in the immune system and are linked to several human diseases. Targeting chemokine receptors have so far shown very little success owing to, to some extent, the promiscuity of the immune system and the high degree of biased signaling within it. CCR7 and its two endogenous ligands display biased signaling and here we investigate the differences between the two ligands, CCL21 and CCL19, with respect to their biased activation of CCR7. We use bystander bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) based signaling assays and Transwell migration assays to determine (A) how swapping of domains between the two ligands affect their signaling patterns and (B) how receptor mutagenesis impacts signaling. Using chimeric ligands we find that the chemokine core domains are central for determining signaling outcome as the lack of β-arrestin-2 recruitment displayed by CCL21 is linked to its core domain and not N-terminus. Through a mutagenesis screen, we identify the extracellular domains of CCR7 to be important for both ligands and show that the two chemokines interact differentially with extracellular loop 2 (ECL-2). By using in silico modeling, we propose a link between ECL-2 interaction and CCR7 signal transduction. Our mutagenesis study also suggests a lysine in the top of TM3, K1303.26, to be important for G protein signaling, but not β-arrestin-2 recruitment. Taken together, the bias in CCR7 between CCL19 and CCL21 relies on the chemokine core domains, where interactions with ECL-2 seem particularly important. Moreover, TM3 selectively regulates G protein signaling as found for other chemokine receptors.

Antibodies Targeting Chemokine Receptors CXCR4 and ACKR3.

Dysregulation of the chemokine system is implicated in a number of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, as well as cancer. Modulation of chemokine receptor function is a very promising approach for therapeutic intervention. Despite interest from academic groups and pharmaceutical companies, there are currently few approved medicines targeting chemokine receptors. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-based molecules have been successfully applied in the clinical therapy of cancer and represent a potential new class of therapeutics targeting chemokine receptors belonging to the class of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Besides conventional mAbs, single-domain antibodies and antibody scaffolds are also gaining attention as promising therapeutics. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of mAbs, single-domain antibodies, and other antibody fragments targeting CXCR4 and ACKR3, formerly referred to as CXCR7. We discuss their unique properties and advantages over small-molecule compounds, and also refer to the molecules in preclinical and clinical development. We focus on single-domain antibodies and scaffolds and their utilization in GPCR research. Additionally, structural analysis of antibody binding to CXCR4 is discussed. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Modulating the function of GPCRs, and particularly chemokine receptors, draws high interest. A comprehensive review is provided for monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, and variants directed at CXCR4 and ACKR3. Their advantageous functional properties, versatile applications as research tools, and use in the clinic are discussed.

Chemokines in COPD: From Implication to Therapeutic Use.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) represents the 3rd leading cause of death in the world. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms have been the focus of extensive research in the past. The lung has a complex architecture, where structural cells interact continuously with immune cells that infiltrate into the pulmonary tissue. Both types of cells express chemokines and chemokine receptors, making them sensitive to modifications of concentration gradients. Cigarette smoke exposure and recurrent exacerbations, directly and indirectly, impact the expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors. Here, we provide an overview of the evidence regarding chemokines involvement in COPD, and we hypothesize that a dysregulation of this tightly regulated system is critical in COPD evolution, both at a stable state and during exacerbations. Targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors could be highly attractive as a mean to control both chronic inflammation and bronchial remodeling. We present a special focus on the CXCL8-CXCR1/2, CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3, CCL2-CCR2, and CXCL12-CXCR4 axes that seem particularly involved in the disease pathophysiology.