Abstract Exaggerated systolic blood pressure (SBP) during submaximal exercise is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, findings are mixed and new evidence indicates that cardiorespiratory fitness should be considered for proper clinical interpretation of exercise SBP responses. This study aimed to determine the relationship between SBP response to submaximal effort corrected for fitness and abnormalities of cardiac structure and function. Methods Each of 231 participants (age 54±12 years; 53% females) with controlled clinic BP, no evidence for ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease or heart failure underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (Bruce protocol), resting and exercise echocardiography and 24h ABPM. Submaximal exercise SBP (measured at the 2nd stage of Bruce protocol) was corrected for two fitness variables: 1) peak VO2 and 2) maximal workload in METs (SBP/peakVO2 and SBP/METs). Results There were no, or weak, associations with exercise SBP and target organ damage. However, there was a progressive deterioration of cardiac function and structure parameters across the exercise SBP tertiles corrected for fitness (Table 1). Both SBP/peakVO2 and SBP/METs significantly correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass, LV diastolic and systolic, and left atrial parameters (Table 2). ROC analysis revealed good performance of corrected SBP response to submaximal exercise in detection of LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction (AUC 0.792 and 0.808, and 0.771 and 0.802 for SBP/peakVO2 and SBP/METs, respectively; Figure). Conclusions Fitness-corrected SBP responses to submaximal exercise can identify more profound target organ damage with respect to cardiac function and structure even among patients with controlled clinic BP. Exaggerated BP response to exercise must be considered relative to fitness for proper clinical interpretation of BP responses to exercise testing.Figure