Target Lesion Revascularization Research Articles

Excimer laser coronary angioplasty combined with drug-coated balloon in the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) combined with drug-coated balloons(DCBs) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to explore whether the contrast injection technique would improve the neointimal tissue ablation of ELCA. We studied patients diagnosed with ISR between January 2019 and October 2022 at two medical centers. These patients underwent DCB angioplasty guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Based on whether ELCA was performed before DCB treatment, patients were categorized into two groups: the ELCA + DCB group and the DCB group. All patients underwent clinical follow-up 1 year after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR), which was defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or bypass surgery on the target vessel conducted to address restenosis or other complications related to the target lesion. The secondary endpoints including immediate luminal gain (ΔMLA, defined as the difference in minimum lumen area before and after the intervention). A total of 85 lesions in 75 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 64.2 ± 12.0 years, with 81.3% male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced, and procedural success was 100% in both groups. The ELCA + DCB group (n = 24) exhibited a greater ΔMLA compared to the DCB group (n = 61) (3.57 ± 0.79 mm² vs. 2.50 ± 1.06 mm², [95% confidence interval,CI: 0.57-1.69], p < 0.001), The reduction in 1-year TLR was more frequently observed in patients from the ELCA + DCB group compared to the DCB group (hazard ratio 0.33 [95% CI: 0.11-0.99]; log-rank p = 0.048). The exploratory analysis showed that ELCA with contrast infusion is associated with greater acute lumen gain compared to ELCA with saline infusion (p < 0.001). The combination of ELCA and DCB is a safe and effective treatment strategy for in-stent stenosis. Additionally, compared with saline injection, ELCA with contrast injection is associated with greater acute lumen gain. However, the optimal contrast agent concentration and long-term outcome of the contrast injection technique need confirmation through larger sample sizes and prospective studies.

Cardiogenic shock following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in women: complications and outcomes

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Differences in women’s prognosis have been described for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). These might reflect asymmetries in clinical management, but also gender-specific comorbidities and pathologic mechanisms. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the risk of in-hospital complications and mid-term outcomes of women with CS following STEMI. Methods We retrospectively studied STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2008 to 2017 in a tertiary care centre, presenting or evolving in Killip class IV (defined as cardiogenic shock or hypotension and organ hypoperfusion). Clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as complications and outcomes, were collected. Major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up was a composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization. Results Among 1131 patients presenting with STEMI, our study included 117 (10.3%) patients in CS, of which 40 (34.2%) were women. Women were older [71.8(±13.4) vs 64.6(±11.72) years, p=0.002] and less frequently smokers (25.0% vs 50.7%, p=0.008). Prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors, namely diabetes (34,1% vs 39.2%, p=0.860), hypertension (71.5% vs 60.8%, p=0.212), and dyslipidaemia (47.5% vs 70.0%, p=0.799), was the same for both groups. Body mass index was also similar [26.6(±5.2) vs 26.1(±3.4) kg/m2, p=0.539]. Women had lower haemoglobin [12.4(±1.9) vs 13.8(±1.9) g/dl, p&amp;lt;0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [52.4(±30.6) vs 67.3(±29.4) ml/min, p=0.017]. Door-to-balloon times [80(59-180) vs 68(48-105) min, p=0.302], total ischemic time [210(120-360) vs 203(120-476) min, p=0.302] and prevalence of anterior STEMI (35.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.123) were not significantly different between sexes. The prevalence of in-hospital complications was generally similar for both sexes (Table 1), except for the risk of advanced atrioventricular (AV) block that was higher in women (32.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.004). Also, haemoglobin nadir was lower in women [10.6(±2.1) vs 11.7(±2.1) g/dl, p=0.023]. In a 1-year follow-up, the occurrence of MACCE was similar for both sexes (60.0% vs 59.7%, log-rank P 0.734) (Figure 1). Conclusion Women with STEMI complicated by CS submitted to PCI had a similar prevalence of in-hospital complications as men. Also, mid-term outcomes, assessed by MACCE at 1 year, did not differ between groups.

Drug-Eluting Balloons in Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes

Background: The usefulness of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) has not been fully elucidated in calcified coronary lesions (CCLs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DEBs compared to a drug-eluting stent (DES) in this setting. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched through December 2023. The primary endpoint was 12 months major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes and angiographic results after PCI and at a 12-month follow-up. Results: Five studies and a total of 1141 patients with 1176 coronary lesions were included. Overall, the DEB was comparable to DES in MACE (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.62–1.19, p = 0.36), cardiac death (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.23–1.53, p = 0.28), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.25–3.24, p = 0.87) and target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.68–1.77, p = 0.70). Although the DEB was associated with worse acute angiographic outcomes (acute gain; MD = −0.65, 95% CI: −0.73, −0.56 and minimal lumen diameter; MD = −0.75, 95% CI: −0.89, −0.61), it showed better results at 12 months follow-up (late lumen loss; MD = −0.34, 95% CI: −0.62, −0.07). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that the DEB strategy is comparable to DES in the treatment of CCLs in terms of clinical outcomes. Although the DEB strategy had inferior acute angiographic results, it may offer better angiographic results at follow-up.

Sex disparities in mid-term outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction across age

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been reported to have higher short-term mortality than men, especially in younger patients. However, data on long-term outcomes did not corroborate this association. Purpose We aimed to evaluate if sex was an independent predictor of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up. A sub-analysis across different age subgroups was performed. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of MACCE at 1-year follow-up (death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization). Patients were divided into four age groups, according to quartiles, for subgroup analysis (≤50, 51-60, 61-70, &amp;gt;71 years). Results Of the 1131 patients included in the study, 291 (25.7%) were women. Women were older [68.2 (±14.2) vs 60.6 (±12.2) years, p&amp;lt;0.001], more often non-smokers (21.5% vs 60.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (34,8% vs 20.9%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and hypertension (71.6% vs 50.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001). They also had lower haemoglobin [12.8 (±1.6) vs 14.5 (±1.7) g/dl, p&amp;lt;0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [73.8 (±35.3) vs 92.6 (±35.2) ml/min, p&amp;lt;0.001], as well as longer door-to-balloon times [90 (60-166) vs 75(50-120) min, p=0.005]. However, total ischemic time was not significantly different between groups [250(175-480) vs 224(150-440) min, p=0.054]. Overall, women had a higher occurrence of MACCE (22.1% vs 15.4%; log-rank P = 0.008, Figure 1). On multivariate analysis, sex was not found to be an independent predictor of MACCE (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77–1.65; P = 0.547). The risk of unfavourable outcomes was mainly driven by other comorbidities (namely, age, presence of peripheral arterial disease, lower haemoglobin concentration, lower systolic blood pressure on admission, a higher peak CK activity, and the utilization of a femoral approach). When MACCE was stratified by age, sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE in any age group (Figure 2). Conclusion Women with STEMI submitted to PCI had a higher rate of MACCE at 1-year follow-up compared with men, however, sex was not an independent predictor of these events on multivariate analysis, regardless of the age subgroups considered.

The efficacy of atherectomy combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with PTA/DCB for infrapopliteal arterial diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

With the development of endovascular therapies, some studies have indicated a therapeutic potential for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization with atherectomy (AT). This study was designed to perform a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of AT combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with PTA or DCB for infrapopliteal arterial diseases. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for articles published up to November 2022, reporting using atherectomy devices for infrapopliteal arterial patients. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies were included, and clinical characteristic outcomes were extracted and pooled. Then, we analyzed the efficacies of the AT (AT + PTA or DCB) group and the non-AT (DCB or PTA) group for infrapopliteal arterial patients. We identified 6 studies with 1269 patients included in this meta-analysis. The risk ratios (RRs) of primary patency for patients treated with atherectomy group compared to non-atherectomy group at 6months was 1.03 (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.86-1.23, p = .74), at 12months was 1.05 (95% CIs 0.84-1.30, p = .66), in the subgroup analysis between AT combined with DCB and DCB alone, the RRs of primary patency was 1.56 (95% CIs 1.02-2.39, p = .04). The RRs of freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months was 1.04 (95% CIs 0.93-1.17, p = .45), at 12 months was 1.20 (95% CIs 0.83-1.75, p = .33). The RRs of mortality at 6 months was 0.57 (95% CIs 0.29-1.11, p = .10), and at 12 months was 0.79 (95% CI 0.50-1.25, p = .31). The RRs of limb salvage at 12 months was 0.99 (95% CIs 0.92-1.07, p = .87). The standardized mean difference (SMD) of (Ankle-brachial index) ABI at 12months was 0.16 (95% CIs 0.06-0.26, p = .001). According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, no significant advantages were found with the addition of atherectomy to balloon angioplasty in the below-the-knee segment. Only in the analysis of a small subgroup of atherectomy + DCB versus DCB alone was the primary patency rate at six months significantly higher when adding atherectomy. No further significant differences were found related to 12months of primary patency, TLR, limb salvage, and mortality among groups.

One-year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer-coated Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent in Acute Coronary Syndrome - A Patient-level Pooled Analysis from Two Indian Registries.

This pooled analysis was conducted to assess the clinical safety and performance of the Supra family (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd., Surat, India) of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) including ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from two real-world all-comers Indian registries at one-year. We evaluated 1824 patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with the Supra family of SES from two real-world Indian registries (891 patients from T-Flex registry and 933 patients from Tetriflex real-world registry). The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at one-year follow-up. The safety endpoint was stent thrombosis at one-year follow-up. Among a total of 1824 patients with ACS, 689 (37.8%) patients presented with STEMI. In ACS and STEMI groups, 47.6% and 41.8% patients had multi-vessel disease, respectively. Of 2128 lesions in ACS group, 76.7% lesions were type B2/C and 16.2% lesions were totally occluded. In the STEMI group, out of 784 treated lesions, 76.7% were type B2/C lesions and 21.9% were totally occluded. At one-year follow-up, incidence of TLF was 5.3% (cardiac death: 0.9%, TV-MI: 2.5%, TLR: 1.9%) in patients with ACS and 6.2% (cardiac death: 1.4%, TV-MI: 2.1%, TLR: 2.7%) in patients with STEMI. The one-year rate of definite/probable stent thrombosis were 0.3% and 0.7% in patients with ACS and STEMI, respectively. This patient-level pooled analysis provides evidence for the safe and effective use of the Supra family of SES in complex patient populations such as ACS and even in STEMI with favourable rates of TLF and stent thrombosis at one-year follow-up.

Final 5-year report of BIONYX comparing the thin-composite wire-strut zotarolimus-eluting stent versus ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent.

The BIONYX randomized trial is the first study to evaluate the Resolute Onyx durable polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in all-comers. Furthermore, it is the first trial to assess safety and efficacy of this stent versus the Orsiro biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in all-comers, paying particular attention to patients with diabetes. It has previously shown promising results until 3 years of follow-up. We aimed to assess long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Onyx ZES versus Orsiro SES at 5-year follow-up. The main composite endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF): cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction,or target vessel revascularization. Time to primary and secondary endpoints was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods, applying the log-rank test for between-group comparison. Follow-up was available in 2414/2488 (97.0%) patients. After 5 years, TVF showed no significant difference between Onyx ZES and Orsiro SES (12.7% vs. 13.7%, hazard ratio [HR]0.94, 95%confidence interval [CI][0.75-1.17], plog-rank = 0.55). Landmark analysis between 3- and 5-year follow-up found a lower target lesion revascularization rate for Onyx ZES (1.1% vs. 2.4%, HR 0.47, 95%CI[0.24-0.93], plog-rank = 0.026). A prespecified subgroup analysis showed no significant between-stent difference in clinical outcome among patients with diabetes. After treatment with Onyx ZES, patients aged ≥75 years had significantly lower rates of TVF (13.8% vs. 21.9%, HR 0.60, 95%CI[0.39-0.93], plog-rank = 0.023). The final 5-year analysis of the randomized BIONYX trial showed favorable and similar long-term outcomes of safety and efficacy for Onyx ZES and Orsiro SES in both all-comers and patients with diabetes.

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes With the Cilotax Dual Drug-Eluting Stent vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

This study compared the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel/cilostazol-eluting Cilotax stents with those of everolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Real-world data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry were examined. A total of 5,472 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with Cilotax stents (n = 212) or everolimus-eluting stents (n = 5,260). The primary end point was the 3-year rate of target lesion failure. The other end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization), target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders by using a logistic regression model; propensity score matching generated 2 well-balanced groups (Cilotax group, n = 180; everolimus-eluting stents group, n = 170; N = 350). After propensity score matching, baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. After percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with the everolimus-eluting stents group, the Cilotax group more often had major adverse cardiovascular events (24.1% vs 18.5%; P = .042), myocardial infarction (8.0% vs 3.2%; P < .001), target lesion revascularization (8.0% vs 2.6%; P < .001), target vessel revascularization (11.3% vs 4.5%; P < .001), and stent thrombosis (4.7% vs 0.5%; P < .001) before matching. Even after matching, the Cilotax group had more frequent target lesion revascularization (9.4% vs 2.9%; P = .22) and stent thrombosis (5.6% vs 1.2%; P = .34). In patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, use of the Cilotax stent was associated with higher rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis than were everolimus-eluting stents. Use of the Cilotax dual drugeluting stent should be avoided in the treatment of myocardial infarction.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

The benefits of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clinical context of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. We aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011-2020, we identified 1418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. In total, 294 (20.7%) and 1124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. The 1-year TLF was not significantly different between groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.34, p = 0.70). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30days and between 30days and 1year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve the 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Registration: URL: http://cris.nih.go.kr . KCT0000863 and KCT0008355.

ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY (RA) VERSUS CONVENTIONAL STENTING IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) LESIONS

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) sores in coronary arteries present a challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of their complex anatomy and high rates of procedural failure. Objectives: In this comparative study, we aim to investigate the safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy (RA) versus conventional stenting in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. Methods: This comparative study was conducted at Ayub teaching hospital from September 2023 to December 2023. Data was collected from 110 patients from both genders. Patients aged &gt; 18 years and diagnosed with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions in coronary arteries confirmed by coronary angiography were included in the study. Baseline demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, comorbidities, and angiographic characteristics, were collected for each participant. Additionally, procedural details such as the type of intervention, rotational atherectomy, conventional stenting, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and any adverse events encountered during the procedure were recorded. Results: Data were collected from 110 patients from both genders. The mean age of participants in the Rotational Atherectomy (RA) group was 62.4 ± 7.3 years, while in the Conventional Stenting group, it was 61.8 ± 6.9 years. There were 40 males and 15 females in the RA group, compared to 38 males and 17 females in the Conventional Stenting group. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 42.0% in the RA group and 45.5% in the Conventional Stenting group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 53.7 ± 4.2% in the RA group and 54.1 ± 4.5% in the Conventional Stenting group. The RA group showed a success rate of 81.8%, and the conventional stenting group achieved a success rate of 90.9%. However, the RA group experienced slightly higher rates of major procedural complications (9.1% vs. 5.5%) and minor procedural complications (12.7% vs. 10.9%) than the conventional stenting group. Conventional stenting group, the mean change was -1.2 ± 0.7. Additionally, the incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was observed in 8 patients (14.5%) in the RA group and 12 patients (21.8%) in the conventional stenting group. Furthermore, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 9 patients (16.4%) in the RA group and 11 patients (20.0%) in the conventional stenting group. Conclusion: It is concluded that both rotational atherectomy (RA) and conventional stenting are effective and safe treatment options for patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. Our findings suggest that both strategies yield comparable procedural success rates, complication rates, and efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction frequency, troponin levels, and left ventricular ejection fraction changes.

Impact of Periprocedural Myocardial Injury on Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Requiring Atherectomy

The prognostic implications of cardiac troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with atherectomy have not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and its association with cardiovascular events in patients with severely calcified lesions who underwent PCI with atherectomy. The study analyzed 346 patients (377 lesions) who underwent PCI with atherectomy between January 2018 and December 2021. Peak post-PCI high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) was measured. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. A lesion-based analysis was conducted to assess the association of PMI with TLF up to 5 years after PCI. Increase of hs-cTn was seen with 362 lesions (96%), and significant PMI, defined as hs-cTn increase ≥70 × upper reference limit, was seen with 83 lesions (22%). Significant PMI was associated with a significantly greater risk of TLF (adjusted hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.30, p = 0.017), primarily driven by an increased risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio 5.29, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 19.16, p = 0.011). In conclusion, hs-cTn increase was frequently observed in patients who underwent PCI with atherectomy, and significant PMI was associated with an increased risk of TLF and cardiovascular death.

Long-term outcomes following double kissing crush or mini-culotte stenting for complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the EVOLUTE-CRUSHIV study.

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of double kissing crush stenting (DKC) and mini-culotte technique (MCT) in patients with complex bifurcation lesions. This retrospective study enrolled 236 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary bifurcation disease between January 2014 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the combination of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoint was major cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) including all-cause death, MI, TLR, stroke, or stent thrombosis. The regression models were adjusted by applying the inverse probability weighted (IPW) approach to reduce treatment selection bias. The initial management strategy was DKC in 154 (65.3%) patients and MCT in 82(34.7%) patients (male: 194 [82.2%], mean age: 60.85 ± 10.86years). The SYNTAX scores were similar in both groups. The rates of long-term TLF and MACCE rates were 17.4% and 20%, respectively. The rate of TLF (26.8% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.005) was higher in patients treated with MCT than those treated with the DKC technique, mainly driven by more frequent TLR (15.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.035). The long-term TLF and MACCE rates were notably lower in the DKC group compared to the others: adjusted hazard ratio (HR; IPW): 0.407, p = 0.009 for TLF, and adjusted HR(IPW): 0.391 [95% CI: 0.209-0.730], p = 0.003 for MACCE. At long-term follow-up, the rates of TLF and MACCE were 17.4% and 20%, respectively. However, long-term TLF was significantly higher in patients treated with MCT than those treated with the DKC technique, primarily due to amore frequent occurrence of clinically driven TLR.

Outcomes and Comparative Analysis of the Initial Results of Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus in Association With Laser-Excimer Atherectomy in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis (INTACT).

Despite improved patency with newer-generation nitinol stents, one-half of patients will require secondary interventions for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The best treatment strategy remains unclear. This study aimed to compare drug-coated balloons (DCBs) used alone or in association with excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of femoropopliteal-ISR. The INTACT trial is a multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized trial conducted across 14 centers from December 2015 to November 2019. Patients Rutherford Class 2-5 with ISR≥70% were followed-up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrent ISR>70% by duplex ultrasound analysis. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse events (MAEs) defined as death, major amputation, or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Around 134 subjects were randomized to PTA alone (n=41), PTA+DCB (n=43) or PTA+ELA+DCB (n=50). Procedural success was similar (p=.74), as was clinical success (p=.17). The number of recurrent ISR>70% decreased after PTA+ELA+DCB (30.0%; p=.04) and PTA+DCB (30.2%; p=.05) compared to PTA alone (51.2%). Primary patency was higher after PTA+ELA+DCB (log-rank p=.04) and PTA+DCB (log-rank p=.02) compared to PTA alone at 12 months (78.7% and 70.4% vs 61.5%) and 18 months (61.6% and 67.7% vs 37.3%). Freedom from MAEs was lower after PTA+DCB (27.9%) compared to PTA alone (53.7%; p=.02) but did not differ with PTA+ELA+DCB (40.0%). It was primarily driven by TLR; 2 major amputations occurred after PTA+ELA+DCB (4.0%; p=.18). This independent study demonstrated a decrease in recurrent ISR>70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after PTA+ELA+DCB and PTA+DCB compared to PTA alone in the treatment of FP-ISR. It did not show an increase in MAEs but could have lacked power. This multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized, controlled trial focuses on the results of adjunctive therapies, such as excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) and/or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in femoropopliteal lesions in 134 patients. It has the originality of being an independent study funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health. This study confirms a significant decrease in recurrent ISR >70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after the use of ELA+DCB and DCBs compared to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR without an increase in major adverse events.

Comparison between Imaging and Physiology in Guiding Coronary Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely used revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease. The choice between imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI has been a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare outcomes between imaging and physiology-guided PCI and management of intermediate coronary lesions (ICLs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases for studies published up to December 2023 following PRISMA guidelines. Seven eligible studies comparing imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI were selected for the final analysis. Relevant outcome measures included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Subgroup analysis was performed for ICLs. Results: A total of 5701 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower rates of TVR compared to physiology-guided PCI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02); concerning MACE, TVF, and TLR, no differences were found. When the analysis was restricted to studies considering ICLs management, there were no differences between the two techniques. Meta regression analysis did not show any impact of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentation on MACE and TVR. Conclusions: The findings suggest that imaging-guided PCI may reduce the need for future revascularization of the target vessel compared to the functional-guided approach, and this result was not influenced by ACS presentation. These results may have important implications for clinical practice, guiding interventional cardiologists in selecting the most appropriate guidance strategy.

The Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled POLBOS 3 Trial Comparing Regular Drug-Eluting Stents and the Sirolimus-Eluting BiOSS LIM C Dedicated Coronary Bifurcation Stent: Four-Year Results

This multicenter, randomized study aimed to compare the sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM C dedicated coronary bifurcation stent with second-generation -limus drug-eluting stents (rDESs) in the treatment of non-left main (non-LM) coronary bifurcation. The deployment of a single stent in the main vessel–main branch across a side branch was the default strategy in all patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of major cardiovascular events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at 48 months. We enrolled 230 patients, allocating 116 patients to the BiOSS LIM C group and 114 patients to the rDES group. Most procedures were elective (BiOSS vs. rDES: 48.3% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.09) and performed in bifurcations within the left anterior descending/diagonal branch (BiOSS vs. rDES: 51.7% vs. 61.4%, p = 0.15). At 48 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the BiOSS and rDES groups in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) as follows: MACEs—18.1% vs. 14.9%, HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.62–2.22, and p = 0.33; cardiac death—4.3% vs. 3.5%, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.33–4.56, and p = 0.75; MI—2.6% vs. 3.5%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.17–3.23, and p = 0.68; and TLR—11.2% vs. 7.9%, HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.75–3.71, and p = 0.21. The implantation success rate of the BiOSS LIM C stent was very high, and the cumulative MACE rates were promising. The POLBOS 3 trial sets an important benchmark for treating non-LM coronary bifurcations (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03548272).

Dual-pathway inhibition in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring reintervention for infrapopliteal occlusions.

Our study aimed to assess the influence of incorporating new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy on clinical outcomes among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for below-the-knee (BTK) occlusions necessitating reintervention. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and had undergone a successful endovascular intervention for BTK artery occlusion, necessitating reintervention. Patients who underwent endovascular interventions for BTK reocclusion were compared to those who received dual-pathway inhibition with NOAC (rivaroxaban 2.5mg 2 × 1) and clopidogrel (NOAC group), or dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin (DAPT group). The primary endpoints were target vessel reocclusion and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at the 1-year follow-up, while major and minor amputations served as the secondary endpoint. Additionally, a one-year comparison was conducted between the two groups for major bleeding events. 64 patients in our clinic treated with endovascular reintervention (NOAC = 28, DAPT = 34). The TLR rate is 10.7% in NOAC group (N = 3) and 32.4% in DAPT group (N = 11, p = 0.043). The target vessel reocclusion rate is 17.8% in NOAC group (N = 5) and 41.2% in DAPT group (N = 14, p = 0.048). Minor or major amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 3.6% in NOAC group (N = 1) and 11.7% in DAPT group (N = 4, p = 0.245). The patency rate is significantly higher, and the TLR rate is significantly lower in the NOAC group compared to the DAPT group, with no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Although no statistically significant difference exists in amputation rates, a numerical distinction is evident.

Initial experience with a novel stent-based mechanical thrombectomy device for management of acute myocardial infarction cases with large thrombus burden.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and large thrombus burden (LTB) still represent a challenge. Afflicted patients have a high morbidity and mortality. Aspiration thrombectomy is often ineffective in those cases. Mechanical thrombectomy devices (MTDs), which are effective for management of ischemic strokes, were recently CE-approved for treatment of thrombotic coronary lesions. Real-world data about their performance in AMI cases with LTB are scarce. This study sought to summarize our early experience with a novel MTD device in this context. We analyzed consecutive patients from the prospective OPTIMISER registry (NCT04988672), who have been managed with the NeVa™ MTD (Vesalio, USA) for AMI with LTB at a tertiary cardiology facility. Outcomes of interest included, among others, periprocedural complications, target lesion failure (TLF), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI). Overall, 15 patients underwent thrombectomy with the NeVa™ device. Thrombectomy was successfully performed in 14 (93%) patients. Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 13 (87%) patients, while 2 (13%) patients had TIMI 2 flow. We encountered no relevant periprocedural complications, especially no stroke, stent thrombosis or vessel closure. After a mean follow-up time of 26 ± 2.9months, 1 (7%) patient presented with TLR due to stent thrombosis (10months after treatment with the MTD and stenting). In AMI patients with LTB, the deployment of the novel NeVa™ MTD seems efficient and safe. Further randomized trials are warranted to assess whether the use of the NeVa™ device in cases with LTB improves procedural and clinical outcomes.

Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease.

Despite guideline-based recommendation of the interchangeable use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decision-making, iFR/FFR could demonstrate different physiological or clinical outcomes in some specific patient or lesion subsets. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of difference between iFR and FFR-guided revascularization decision-making on clinical outcomes in patients with left main disease (LMD). In this international multicenter registry of LMD with physiological interrogation, we identified 275 patients in whom physiological assessment was performed with both iFR/FFR. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for both iFR/FFR to predict MACE in respective patients in whom revascularization was deferred and performed. In 153 patients of revascularization deferral, MACE occurred in 17.0% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR to predict MACE were 0.88 (specificity:0.74; sensitivity:0.65) and 0.76 (specificity:0.81; sensitivity:0.46), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for iFR than FFR (0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.85 vs. 0.62; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p = 0.012). In 122 patients of coronary revascularization, MACE occurred in 13.1% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR were 0.92 (specificity:0.93; sensitivity:0.25) and 0.81 (specificity:0.047; sensitivity:1.00), respectively. The AUCs were not significantly different between iFR and FFR (0.57; 95%CI 0.40-0.73 vs. 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.61; p = 0.43). While neither baseline iFR nor FFR was predictive of MACE in patients in whom revascularization was performed, iFR-guided deferral seemed to be safer than FFR-guided deferral.

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents for patients at high risk of bleedings: A network meta-analysis.

Among different coronary stents implanted in High Bleeding Risk (HBR) patients with an indication for short antiplatelet therapy, no comparisons in terms of efficacy have been provided. A Network Meta Analysis was performed including all randomized controlled trials comparing different coronary stents evaluated in HBR patients. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) as defined by each included trial were the primary end point, whereas TLR (target lesion revascularization), TVR (target vessel revascularization), stent thrombosis and total and major (BARC3-5) bleedings were the secondary ones. A total of four studies (ONYX ONE, LEADERS FREE, SENIOR and HBR in BIO-RESORT) including 6637 patients were analyzed with different kind of stents and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) length (1 or 6 months) on 12 months follow-up. About one-third of these patients were defined HBR due to indication for oral anticoagulation. All drug eluting stents (DESs) reduced risk of MACE compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMSs) when followed by a 1-month DAPT. At SUCRA analysis, Orsiro was the device with the highest probability of performing best. Rates of TLR and TVR were significantly lower when using Resolute Onyx, Synergy and BioFreedom stents in comparison to BMS when followed by 1-month DAPT, with Synergy ranking best. Synergy also showed a significantly lower number of stent thrombosis compared to BMS (RR 0.28, 95%CI 0.06-0.93), while Orsiro and Resolute Integrity showed the highest probability of performing best. In HBRs patients, all DESs were superior to BMSs in terms of efficacy and safety. Among DESs, Orsiro was the one with the highest ranking in terms of MACE, mainly driven by a reduced incidence of repeated revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains the primary cause of target lesion failure following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), resulting in 10-year incidences of target lesion revascularization at a rate of approximately 20%. The treatment of ISR is challenging due to its inherent propensity for recurrence and varying susceptibility to available strategies, influenced by a complex interplay between clinical and lesion-specific conditions. Given the multiple mechanisms contributing to the development of ISR, proper identification of the underlying substrate, especially by using intravascular imaging, becomes pivotal as it can indicate distinct therapeutic requirements. Among standalone treatments, drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation have been the most effective. The main advantage of a DCB-based approach is the avoidance of an additional metallic layer, which may otherwise enhance neointimal hyperplasia, provide the substratum for developing neoatherosclerosis, and expose the patient to a persistently higher risk of coronary ischemic events. On the other hand, target vessel scaffolding by DES implantation confers relevant mechanical advantages over DCB angioplasty, generally resulting in larger luminal gain, while drug elution from the stent surface ensures the inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia. Nevertheless, repeat stenting with DES also implies an additional permanent metallic layer that may reiterate and promote the mechanisms leading to ISR. Against this background, the selection of either DCB or DES on a patient- and lesion-specific basis as well as the implementation of adjuvant treatments, including cutting/scoring balloons, intravascular lithotripsy, and rotational atherectomy, hold the potential to improve the effectiveness of ISR treatment over time. In this review, we comprehensively assessed the available evidence from randomized trials to define contemporary interventional treatment of ISR and provide insights for future directions.