Tank Mix Research Articles

Herbicide Combinations for Effective Weed Management in Rice

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the most important food crop catering half of the world’s population. India being the second largest producer of rice, needs to produce around 120 million tons of rice by 2030 to feed its one and a half billion plus population. Weeds are undoubtedly a major biotic constraint to rice production in most of the rice growing areas of the world. Rice fields are very often characterized by a complex plurispecific weed flora, comprising of grasses, sedges, and broad-leaved weeds (BLWs). They usually grow faster than rice and absorb available water and nutrient earlier than the rice and suppress rice growth. Cultural and mechanical methods of weed management in general, are time consuming, cumbersome and laborious apart from being less effective because of chance of escape and regeneration of weeds from roots or rhizome that are left behind. Herbicides offer the most effective, economical and practical way of weed management. Since rice ecosystems usually harbours a variety of weeds, the use of a single herbicide cannot give satisfactory results. Moreover, continous use of such herbicides leads to the evolution of weeds resistant to several herbicides. Therefore, more convenient option would be single shot application of ready mix or tank mix combination of herbicide. The herbicide mixtures broaden the spectrum of weed control in single application. The ideal herbicide combinations are those that effectively target the weed species while minimizing toxicity to crops, thereby exhibiting enhanced selectivity. Using herbicide combinations allows for reduced herbicide use rates compared to using a single herbicide. Additionally, apart from providing broad-spectrum weed control, herbicide combinations reduce the herbicide load in the environment and minimize application costs. Among the various combination herbicides available, the ones having pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides combined had shown better weed control with single shot application at reduced cost. Some of the ready-mix herbicide combinations that are gaining greater importance includes Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, Pendimethalin + Penoxsulam and Butachlor + Penoxsulam.

Synergistic impact of tank mixing pendimethalin and pyroxasulfone on soil enzymatic and microbial dynamics.

A field experiment was carried out during the Rabi 2022-23 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana to evaluate the effect of pyroxasulfone and pendimethalin on soil enzymatic and microbial activities when applied individually or as a tank mix combination. The experiment employed a factorial randomized complete block design in triplicate encompassing 16 treatments. Control soils exhibited a continuous increase in enzymatic and microbial activities over time. In herbicide-treated plots, a highly dose-dependent lag phase was observed in all enzymatic and microbial activities which gets shorter or disappear at higher application rates. Following the initial lag phase, inhibition in enzymatic and microbial activities was observed with higher inhibition in tank mix combination (90.7 to 99.1% up to 90days after herbicide application (DAA) followed by pendimethalin (77.3 to 92.9% up to 90 DAA) and pyroxasulfone (30.3 to 76.2% up to 45 DAA). After initial inhibition, enzymatic and microbial activities increased at harvest. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that dehydrogenase activity among soil enzymes and bacteria among microbial populations were more sensitive to studied herbicides. Based on the values of the Integrated Biomarker Response (IBRv2), pendimethalin had a greater impact on soil activities than pyroxasulfone, and their combined application exhibited a synergistic effect.

Growth, nutrient uptake and yield ofdirect seeded rice as influenced by weed management practices

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (Kharif) seasons of 2018 and 2019 at the Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, to evaluate the effect of herbicides and herbicide combinations on the weed management and growth, nutrient uptake and yield of direct seeded rice (DSR). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. Nine weed control treatments were used, including sole application of three herbicides (cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g/ha, bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl@ 60 g/ha), five herbicidal combinations (penoxsulam + cyhalofop butyl commercial formulation @ 150 g/ha, cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g/ha + carfentrazone ethyl @ 200 g/ha, bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha + cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g/ha, bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha + fenoxaprop-p-ethyl @ 60 g/ha and stale seedbed followed by (fb) glyphosate @ 800 g/ha + oxyfluorfen @ 150 g/ha at 15-20 days after land preparation + cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g/ha + carfentrazone ethyl @ 200 g/ha), and hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing. Weeds removed 27.72, 4.61 and 67.95 kg of N, P and K/ha respectively at 45 days after treatment application (DATA) under unweeded conditions in direct seeded rice. Herbicidal treatments enhanced grain yield by 23.89 to 58.84 % and herbicide combinations increased grain yield by 56 to 59 % compared to the unweeded control in direct seeded rice. Tank mix combination of bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha + fenoxaprop-p-ethyl @ 60 g/ha and bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha + cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g/ha and premix combination of penoxsulam + cyhalofop butyl @ 150 g/ha recorded higher nutrient uptake and grain yields (5.03, 4.76 and 4.79 t/ha, respectively) and were on par to hand weeding twice. Unweeded control recorded the lowest pooled grain yield (2.07 t/ha) and uncontrolled weed competition resulted in 59.95 % reduction in grain yield. Keywords: Crop competition, Herbicide combinations, Herbicide interactions, Nutrient removal, Nutrient uptake, Yield reduction

Weed management options in drum seeded wetland rice

High labour requirement and cost for raising nursery and transplanting of the seedlings has necessitated the shift from transplanted rice to direct-seeded rice. To reduce the requirement of large quantity of seeds, incidence of pests and diseases in broadcasting and to ensure uniform seed distribution for consistent crop growth and easier maintenance, mechanization is needed in direct-seeded rice. The major constraint experienced in wet DSR is the occurrence of high weed infestation as emerging seedlings in direct-sown fields are less competitive with concurrently emerging weeds. An experiment was conducted at M. S. Swaminathan Rice Research Station, Moncompu, Kerala Agricultural University during kharif and rabi 2021-22, with eight treatments and three replications in randomised complete block design to identify suitable cost-effective agronomic management practices to enhance the productivity of drum seeded rice and to maximise its resource-use-efficiency. The results revealed wet DSR using drumseeder as a viable crop establishment method for reducing the seed requirement, cultivation time, energy, cost of cultivation, pest and disease infestation, minimise plant stress due to transplanting and sustaining yield. There was significant variation in the yield and yield attributes in drum seeding depending on the weed management strategies adopted viz., two conoweedings, post emergent herbicide application, pre followed by post emergent herbicide application, post emergent herbicide application followed by conoweeding. Post-emergence application of Chlorimuron ethyl + Metsulfuron methyl @ 0.004 kg/ha and Penoxsulam + Cyhalofop butyl @ 0.135 kg/ha as tank mix at 18 DAS followed by conoweeding at 30 DAS was found economical in drum seeding which was on par yield with broadcasted crop yield under post emergent herbicide application.

Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Annual Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) in the Southeastern Cropping Region of Australia

Annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) is a problematic weed in winter crops and fallows in the southeastern cropping region (SCR) of Australia. This weed has evolved resistance to multiple herbicide groups, globally. In Australia, L. rigidum is more prevalent in the western and southern regions than in SCR. To assess the herbicide resistance status of L. rigidum, the response of five L. rigidum populations (collected from the SCR) to glyphosate, glufosinate, paraquat, haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and clethodim is determined using dose–response curves. Three parametric logistic models are used to determine the herbicide dose required to achieve 50% survival (LD50) and 50% growth reduction (GR50). The LD50 values for 50% survival at 28 days after treatment range from 1702 g a.e. ha−1 to 8225 g a.e. ha−1 for glyphosate, 1637 g a.i. ha−1 to 1828 g a.i. ha−1 for glufosinate, 141 g a.i. ha−1 to 307 g a.i. ha−1 for paraquat, 11 g a.i. ha−1 to 107 g a.i. ha−1 for haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and 17 g a.i. ha−1 to 48 g a.i. ha−1 for clethodim. The resistance factor, based on GR50 value, is highest in the S7 population (2.2 times) for glyphosate, the S11 population (2.3 times) for glufosinate, the S11 population (2.0 time) for paraquat, the S7 population (3.9 times) for haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and the S3 population (3.1 times) for clethodim, compared with the susceptible or less tolerant population. The S11 population is found to be resistant to five tested herbicides, based on resistance factors. Similarly, the S3 population is highly resistant to glyphosate, haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and clethodim compared with the W4 population. These results suggest that L. rigidum populations in the SCR exhibit resistance to multiple herbicide groups at labelled field rates. The findings highlight the necessity of adopting an integrated management approach, including the use of residual herbicides, tank mixing herbicides with different modes of action, and rotating herbicides in conjunction with cultural and mechanical control methods.

Ensuring Pesticide Compatibility in Tank Mixes

This publication is intended to help pesticide applicators and county Extension faculty to better understand proper pesticide mixing and to reduce instances of incompatibility. After reading this publication, readers should understand the causes of pesticide incompatibility, how to avoid incompatibility, and how to maximize the benefits of tank mixing. Written by Brett Bultemeier, Ethan Carter, and Benjamin Sperry, and published by the UF/IFAS Pesticide Information Office, September 2024.

Capillary-Driven Microdevice Mixer Using Additive Manufacturing (SLA Technology)

This study presents a novel microfluidic mixer designed, fabricated, and characterized using additive manufacturing technology—stereolithography (SLA)—and harnessing capillarity principles achieved through microstructure patterning. Micromixers are integral components in optimizing mixing and reaction processes within microfluidic systems. The proposed microdevice employs a tank mixing method capable of blending two fluids. With a channel length of up to 6 mm, the process time is remarkably swift at 3 s, and the compact device measures 35 × 40 × 5 mm. The capillarity-driven working flow rates range from 1 μL/s to 37 μL/s, facilitated by channel dimensions varying between 400 μm and 850 μm. The total liquid volume within the device channels is 1652 mL (6176 μL including the supply tanks). The mix index, representing the homogeneity of the two fluids, is approximately 0.55 along the main channel. The manufacturing process, encompassing printing, isopropyl cleaning, and UV (ultraviolet) curing, is completed within 90 min. This microfluidic mixer showcases efficient mixing capabilities, rapid processing, and a compact design, marking it as a promising advancement in microfluidic technology. The new microfluidic mixer is a major step forward in microfluidic technology, providing a cost-effective and flexible solution for various uses. Its compatibility with SLA additive manufacturing allows for quick prototyping and design improvements, making it valuable for research and practical applications in chemistry, biology, and diagnostics. This study highlights the importance of combining advanced manufacturing techniques with basic fluid dynamics to create effective and easy-to-use microfluidic solutions.

Efficacy of sequential application of herbicide mixture for management of multiple herbicide resistant in Phalaris minor in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

The emergence of multiple herbicide resistance in Phalaris minor is a major threat to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. The present study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2020–21 and 2021–22 at research farm of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana for management of herbicide resistance in Phalaris minor Retz. in wheat using pre and post-emergence herbicide mixtures with different mode of action. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with 15 treatments, replicated thrice. Sequential application of flumioxazin 125 g/ha with pendimethalin (tank mix) 1500 g/ha fb clodinafop + metribuzin 174 g/ha resulted in significantly lowest weed density, dry matter of P. minor and broad-leaf weeds, and it was statistically comparable to application of flumioxazin alone or as mixture with pendimethalin as pre-emergence; pyraxosulfone + pendimethalin 127.5 + 1500 g/ha fb PoE (post-emergence) application of either mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron 14.4 g/ha; sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron 50 + 4 g/ha, clodinafop + metribuzin 174 g/ha, respectively. Phytotoxicity of flumioxazin was observed on wheat after 2–3 days of 1st irrigation i.e. 25 DAS (days after sowing). Application of pyroxasulfone + pendimethalin pre fb PoE mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron resulted in significantly higher grain yield (5847 and 5369 kg/ha, during 2021 and 2022, respectively) as compared to other herbicides.

Growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays) as influenced by sequential and combined application of tank mix herbicides

The experiment was conducted during 2021–22 at Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand to evaluate the impact of sequential and tank mix application of pre- and post-emergence herbicide on weed dynamics and maize productivity. The study was comprised of 9 treatments viz. Weedy (T1 ); Weed free (T2 ); Pre-emergence (PE) application of Atrazine -1 kg a.i./ha fb hand weeding (T3 ); PE application of Atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha fb Post Emergence (Post E) application of Topramezone - 25.2 g a.i./ha (T4 ); PE application of Atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha fb Post E application of Tembotrione - 120 g a.i./ha (T5 ); PE application of Atrazine - 1.0 kg a.i./ha fb Post E application of Topramezone - 25.2 g a.i./ha (T6 ); PE application of Atrazine - 1.0 kg a.i./ha fb Post E application of Tembotrione - 120 g a.i./ha (T7 ); Early Post E application of Topramezone - 25.2 g a.i./ha + Atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha (T8 ) and Early Post E application of Tembotrione - 120 g a.i./ha + Atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha (T9 ). Eleusine indica, Echinochloa colona, Digitaria sanguinalis and Eragrostis japonica were dominant among grassy weeds whereas broad leaf weeds included Cucumis melo, Phyllanthus niruri, Cleome viscosa and Commelina benghalensis. Cyperus rotundus was dominant among sedges. Topramezone - 25.2 g a.i./ha + Atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha Early Post E resulted significantly lower total weed density and was similar to other herbicidal treatments. The highest grain yield (7.2 t/ha) was recorded in a weed-free crop that was similar to all herbicidetreated crops and significantly higher than the weedy crop. Tank mix application of atrazine - 0.75 kg a.i./ha with tembotrione 120 g a.i./ha or topramezone 25.2 g a.i./ha at 15 DAS can be suggested owing to higher grain yield and profits for farmers while lowering the dose and expenses involved in manual weeding and spraying atrazine separately.

Effect of Tank Mix Post-emergence Herbicides on Soil Dehydrogenase Activity and Its Phytotoxicity on Wheat

Effect of Tank Mix Post-emergence Herbicides on Soil Dehydrogenase Activity and Its Phytotoxicity on Wheat

Pyroxasulfone based tank-mix herbicide combinations for diverse weed flora control in wheat

Field studies were conducted to assess the efficacy of pyroxasulfone alone and its combinations with other herbicides at different time of application against a diverse weed flora in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Applications of pyroxasulfone at 125 g/ha as pre-emergence (PE) or early post-emergence (EPO) at 20 days after sowing effectively controlled the grass weeds (Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Durieu). However, pyroxasulfone alone exhibited poor control of broad-leaved weeds, such as Medicago denticulata Willd and Rumex dentatus L. To address the limitations in controlling broad-leaved weeds, tank mix combinations of pyroxasulfone at 125 g/ha with either pendimethalin at 1000 g/ha or metsulfuron at 4 g/ha or metribuzin at 300 g/ha proved highly effective. Pre-emergence pyroxasulfone application in combination with either metsulfuron (125 + 4 g/ha) or with metribuzin (125 + 300 g/ha) in wheat gave effective control of diverse weed flora and improved wheat productivity by 52.1% and 51.2%, respectively, over untreated control. Ready mix combination of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g/ha applied as post emergence (32 DAS) provided >99% control of P. minor, A. ludoviciana, M. denticulata and R. dentatus L., however the phytotoxicity with this treatment produced 6.7% lower yield as compared to season long weed free conditions. Among the herbicidal treatments, pre-emergence application of pyroxasulfone + metsulfuron at 125 + 4 g/ha had the highest net returns followed by alone application of pre-emergence metribuzin at 300 g/ha.

How can an in vitro incompatibility of Trichoderma-based products and herbicides impact the parasitism and control of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary)?

The integration of management methods for both diseases and weeds depends on the compatibility between the tools. Biological control represents an important strategy to cope with the integrated management of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) through parasitism of sclerotia. However, its application in the field is more cost-effective if combined with the herbicide in a tank mix, as long as the products are compatible. Therefore, we aimed at (i) evaluating two compatibility test methodologies (constant exposure and different times) and (ii) two soybean crop seasons to infer the compatibility of Trichoderma-based products. In vitro bioassays were performed to assess the compatibility between herbicides (Haloxifope-p- methyl, Glyphosate N-ammonium salt, Fluasifope-p-butyl, Fomesafem, Chlorimuron ethyl and Imazapyc + Imazapyr) and two biocontrol agents (Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma harzianum). Thus, the recommended spray volume for each herbicide was added to the PDA culture medium (Potato-Dextrose-Agar) and then deposited in the center of the plate a disc of mycelium from each antagonist isolate (constant exposure). The tests with time of exposure were marked at times 0, 2, 4, 8 and 16 h (simulating tank mixing) and at the spp of each time were plated on PDA medium. For both tests, the mycelial growth and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. were observed. The combination of herbicide and biocontrol was also tested in the field and sclerotia parasitism, white mold incidence and plant yield were assessed in two field trials. The constant exposure of the antagonists to herbicides revealed that no herbicide was compatible with the T. asperellum or T. harzianum. While in test, exposure time exhibited compatibility with either T. asperellum or T. harzianum, within a period of 2 to 8 h. Conclusively, the integration of biocontrol agents with the herbicide imazapique + imazapyr exhibited significant reductions in white mold disease incidence and conidia germination, along with effective parasitism of S. sclerotiorum and even the least compatible herbicide (glyphosate) resulted in significant reduction in the disease incidence and sustained yield when compared to the untreated control. Therefore, the integration of the biocontrol agent for white mold should always be considered, and the tank mixing of it with the herbicide represents a cost-effective alternative for the grower.

Impact of Foliar Fungicide Application on the Culturable Fungal Endophyte Community of Soybean Seed in the Midwest United States.

The purpose of our study was to determine whether the application of quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) and pyrazole-carboxamide fungicides as a tank mix would impact the endophyte community of soybean seed. Field trials during 2018 in Iowa, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, U.S.A., investigated the impact of a single combination fungicide spray at early pod set in soybeans. The composition of culturable endophytic fungi in mature soybean seed was assessed on three cultivars per state, with maturity groups (MGs) ranging from 1.1 to 4.7. An unusually wet 2018 season delayed harvest, which led to a high level of fungal growth in grain. The survey included 1,080 asymptomatic seeds that were disinfested and individually placed on 5-cm-diameter Petri plates of acidified water agar. The survey yielded 721 fungal isolates belonging to 24 putative species in seven genera; taxa were grouped into genera based on a combination of morphological and molecular evidence. The dominant genera encountered in the survey were Alternaria, Diaporthe, and Fusarium. The study showed that the fungicide treatment reduced the incidence of Fusarium in Wisconsin seed, increased the incidence of Diaporthe in seed from all states, and had no impact on the incidence of Alternaria. This is one of the first attempts to characterize the diversity of seed endophytes in soybean and the first to characterize the impacts of fungicide spraying on these endophyte communities across three states. Our study provides evidence that the impact of a fungicide spray on soybean seed endophyte communities may be influenced by site, weather, and cultivar maturity group.

Productivity of Dry Direct Seeded Rice as Influenced by Herbicide Combinations

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif, 2022, in Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad in Telangana state, India. Fourteen weed management practices were evaluated in a randomized complete block design, replicated thrice. Weed management in Dry DSR can be done by adopting mechanical/ Hand weeding at 20, 40, 60 DAS under labour available conditions. Under labour scarcity conditions PE application of Pendimethalin 38.4% + Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 0.85% ZC 900 + 20 g/ha (Ready mix) followed by Metsulfuron Methyl 10% + Chlorimuron ethyl 10% WP 4 g/ha + Cyhalofop Butyl 10% EC 75g/ha (Tank mix) PoE weed followed by mechanical weeding at 40-45 DAS is the best option. Other suitable Pre emergence herbicides that can be used are Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP 20 g/ha, Pendimethalin 38.4% + Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 0.85% ZC 900 + 20 g/ha (Ready mix) and Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS 677.25 g/ha. Post emergence application of Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron l0% WG 44+22.5 g/ha (Ready mix) and Penoxsulam 1.02 % + Cyhalofop-butyl 5.1% OD 135 g/ha (Ready mix) at 2-4 weed leaf stage.

Compatibility Studies on Selective Insecticides, Fungicides and Water-Soluble Fertilizer Mixtures in Soybean

In present context, there is a demand for combination spray of insecticides and fungicides to manage both insect pests and diseases simultaneously in a crop season. However, tank mixing of incompatible combinations can reduce the effectiveness of the chemicals, cause phytotoxicity or development of insecticide resistance in pests. Hence, a laboratory experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station (UAS, Dharwad), Sankeshwar, Karnataka to study the physical, chemical and phytotoxic compatibility of selective insecticides, fungicides and water-soluble fertilizer mixtures at their recommended dose in soybean by jar compatibility method. Out of eighteen different combinations tested emamectin benzoate 5 SG (0.3 g l-1) in combination with propiconazole 25 EC (1 ml l-1) and 19:19:19 (N:P:K @ 5 g l-1), as well as lambda cyhalothrin 4.6 + chlorantraniliprole 9.3 ZC (0.4 ml l-1) in combination with propiconazole 25 EC (1 ml l-1) and 19:19:19 (5 g l-1) exhibited sedimentation levels of 1 ml l-1 which was less than the limits of 2 ml 100 ml-1 as specified in 1973 by Indian Standard Institute. The pH of agrochemicals both alone and combinations in all solutions test ranged from 6.02 to 8.39 and none of the solutions found extremely acidic nor alkaline. No phytotoxic symptoms were observed in combination treatments at 5 and 10 days after spraying. All test combinations were physically, chemically and biologically compatible hence, tank mixing of these chemicals can be recommended in soybean for managing of insect pest and diseases.

Fungicide Use Patterns in Select United States Wine Grape Production Regions.

Wine grape production (Vitis sp.) in the United States requires fungicide inputs for disease control. Currently, there is limited data available on vineyard fungicide use patterns. This information is important in developing tailored recommendations for disease management and fungicide stewardship. In this paper, we summarize the wine grape vineyard fungicide use patterns from four major regions: Napa and Sonoma valleys (California), Willamette Valley (Oregon), Columbia Valley (Washington), and several smaller regions east of the Mississippi River in years 2009 to 2020. We learned that the average in-season total fungicide applications ranged regionally from 5.6 to 8. The most commonly applied Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) codes in spray programs were FRAC 3, 13, and M02 across all regions, with some variation to the top four groups in each region. Most applications were made on 14-day intervals; however, shorter intervals (7-day) were favored early season, and longer intervals (21-day) were favored late season. Tank-mixing multiple active ingredients was common east of the Mississippi River during all stages of grape development; this action was typically favored during the bloom period in other regions. In a subset of records that participated in FRAC 11 fungicide resistance testing, the average number of FRAC 11 applications after testing was reduced to either no applications or one application in Napa and Sonoma valleys. This survey provides regionally specific data related to fungicide stewardship practices that could be a focus for future stewardship messaging and fungicide resistance selection training, including total product use (selection events), spray intervals (selection pressure), and tank mixing (selection management).[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Crop establishment methods and herbicide mixtures induced weed dynamics, productivity, and profitability of summer rice

Rice farmers face challenges in achieving higher yield and profit during the summer season due to improper establishment and weed control. To address this, a study was conducted to assess the effects of herbicide combinations on the growth and yield of CR Dhan 206 (Gopinath), a high-yielding rice variety. The research took place from January to May 2022 at the PG Research Farm of M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi, Odisha. The experiment followed a split plot design with two main plots (transplanted rice and wet seeded rice) and five subplots (fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + ethoxysulfuron (Tank mix) @ (50+15) g ha-1 at 18 days after transplanting/sowing (DAT/S); triafamone + ethoxysulfuron (Ready mix) @ (45+22.5) g ha-1 at 12 DAT/S; pretilachlor + bensulfuron-methyl (Ready mix) @ (600+60) g ha-1 at 4 DAT/S; weed-free (Hand weeding at 20,40,60 DAT/S); and weedy check) replicated thrice. The dominant weeds observed were Echinochloa colona, Leptochloa chinensis, Cyanotis auxiliaris, Physalis minima, Ludwigia parviflora, Cyperus iria, and Fimbristylis miliacea. Results indicated that the establishment methods did not significantly affect crop growth, yield attributes, crop yield, and weed infestation. However, the application of triafamone + ethoxysulfuron in both transplanted and wet seeded rice demonstrated superior growth, yield, weed control, and comparable results to the weed-free check. The combination of wet seeded rice and triafamone + ethoxysulfuron showed the highest net return and benefit-cost ratio, suggesting its recommendation for effective weed control and profitability in rice farming in summer season.

Weed management in Bt. Cotton through sequential and tank mix application of different herbicides

Weed management in Bt. Cotton through sequential and tank mix application of different herbicides

Weed dynamics and maize productivity as influenced by sole and tank mix application of herbicides

Weed dynamics and maize productivity as influenced by sole and tank mix application of herbicides

Evaluation of tank mix partners on the efficacy of the novel biopesticide Calantha (ledprona) against first-generation Colorado potato beetle, 2023

Evaluation of tank mix partners on the efficacy of the novel biopesticide Calantha (ledprona) against first-generation Colorado potato beetle, 2023