Objective.Artificial intelligence (AI) based treatment planning tools are being implemented in clinic. However, human interactions with such AI tools are rarely analyzed. This study aims to comprehend human planner's interaction with the AI planning tool and incorporate the analysis to improve the existing AI tool.Approach.An in-house AI tool for whole breast radiation therapy planning was deployed in our institution since 2019, among which 522 patients were included in this study. The AI tool automatically generates fluence maps of the tangential beams to create anAI plan. Human planner makes fluence edits deemed necessary and after attending physician approval for treatment, it is recorded asfinal plan. Manual modification value maps were collected, which is the difference between theAI-planand thefinal plan. Subsequently, a human-AI interaction (HAI) model using full scale connected U-Net was trained to learn such interactions and perform plan enhancements. The trained HAI model automatically modifies theAI planto generate AI-modified plans (AI-m plan), simulating human editing. Its performance was evaluated against originalAI-planandfinal plan. Main results. AI-m planshowed statistically significant improvement in hotspot control over theAI plan, with an average of 25.2cc volume reduction in breast V105% (p= 0.011) and 0.805% decrease in Dmax (p< .001). It also maintained the same planning target volume (PTV) coverage as thefinal plan, demonstrating the model has captured the clinic focus of improving PTV hot spots without degrading coverage.Significance.The proposed HAI model has demonstrated capability of further enhancing theAI planvia modeling human-AI tool interactions. This study shows analysis of human interaction with the AI planning tool is a significant step to improve the AI tool.
Read full abstract