Significant reduction in the life cycle cost (LCC) of advanced weapon systems can be achieved without sacrificing combat capability by setting design goals for propulsion system that are balanced with the traditionally emphasized performance goals. This design philosophy was evaluated as an integral objective of the Advanced Technology Engine Studies (ATES) program under joint U.S. Navy/Air Force cognizance. This paper documents the methodology and results of ATES program conceptual design studies that set balanced cost-effective propulsion system design goals for durability, reliability, maintainability, and operability for several advanced aircraft weapon systems. URING the past two decades, the life cycle cost of aircraft weapon systems has increased dramatically. This cost escalation, together with funding limitations, makes it difficult for the United States military services to replace aircraft lost through attrition or to introduce new systems. Clearly, the challenge in the design and development of future propulsion systems is to provide for superior performance weapon systems, while at the same time reducing their life cycle cost. In response to this challenge, the Advanced Technology Engine Studies (ATES) program is a currently ongoing 18- month study effort tasked to identify cost-effective design and development philosophies for advanced propulsion systems and to reflect these philosophies in a long-range propulsion plan. The program is under joint U.S. Navy/Air Force cognizance. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft (P&WA) is a prime contractor in this program for the study of propulsion system requirements for 11 advanced aircraft weapon systems. The P&WA study encompasses a wide range of potential ap- plications, including advanced fighters, subsonic bombers, transports, and subsonic and supersonic V/STOLs. To properly assess the propulsion system impacts upon each aircraft weapon system, P&WA has subcontracted to four major airframe companies: The Boeing Company, Grumman Aerospace Corporation, McDonnell Aircraft Company, and the Vought Corporation. Aircraft takeoff gross weight (TOGW) typically has been the figure of merit for evaluating previous weapon systems, largely because it is representative of airframe related development, acquisition, and support costs. In this com- petitive environment, engine manufacturers have placed emphasis on maximizing engine performance to minimize TOGW while placing less emphasis on the engine As a result, engine maintenance costs have escalated and have contributed to the elevated life cycle cost of today's weapon systems. As an integral objective of the ATES program, an advanced design philosophy was applied whereby goals for the engine ilities are established during the conceptual design phase of propulsion system development. Balancing these ilities goals with the traditional engine performance criteria should result in minimum overall weapon system cost of ownership. P&WA developed and applied this conceptual design methodology to identify cost-effective design goals for the engine ilities.