Taipan Snake Venom Time Research Articles

Challenges in laboratory testing of patients suspected of antiphospholipid syndrome: practical implications for clinicians.

This paper focuses on the laboratory tests necessary for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Diagnosis starts with the selection of patients suspicious of having APS. The timing related to the clinical event is important to avoid false classification of APS patients. For the interpretation of the test results of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) understanding of all pitfalls and interferences is necessary. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) measurement remains a complex procedure with many pitfalls and interferences. The effect of anticoagulant therapy, the main confounder of LA measurement, can be overcome by removal agents for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or by considering assays as Taipan snake venom time / Ecarin clotting time not affected by antivitamin K therapy and anti-Xa DOAC. However, both procedures have limitations. Solid-phase assays for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (aβ2GPI) show inter-assay differences. Diagnosis is based on the measurement of three groups of aPL: LA, aCL and aβ2GPI, of IgG and IgM isotype. This allows to make antibody profiles that helps in identifying patients at risk. Other aPL, such as antibodies against the domain I of β2GPI and anti-phosphatidylserine-prothrombin antibodies may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients and in some specific situations of patients with incomplete antibody profile, but are not needed for diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis of APS remains challenging. To increase the diagnostic efficacy and reliability, an integrated interpretation of all results and an interpretative comment should be provided on the laboratory report. Therefore, a close interaction between clinical pathologists and clinicians is mandatory.

Taipan snake venom time has high sensitivity for lupus anticoagulants in non-anticoagulated, triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients.

Dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are the mainstay assays in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet they have limitations, particularly in relation to interferences and specificity. The recently validated Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening with ecarin time (ET) confirmatory assays overcome many of those limitations due to the innate specificity engendered from direct prothrombin activation, and insensitivity to the effects of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The present study aimed to further evidence diagnostic utility of TSVT/ET by performing them in samples from 116 nonanticoagulated patients with established triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Samples were identified in three expert centres who performed dRVVT, APTT and solid phase antiphospholipid antibody assays with reagents from a variety of manufacturers. All samples additionally received TSVT/ET analysis using standardised reagents. Ninety seven of 116 (83.6%) were dRVVT- and APTT-positive, 85/97 (87.6%) of which were TSVT/ET-positive, 9/116 (7.8%) were dRVVT-positive only, 6 of which were TSVT/ET-positive, and 10/116 (8.6%) were APTT-positive only, 5 of which were TSVT/ET-positive. 96/116 TSVT/ET-positivity returned a high sensitivity for LA of 82.8%. Low coefficients of determination revealed weak relationships between LA potency and anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody titres for all three LA assays. TSVT/ET has high sensitivity for the clinically significant LA found in triple positive APS patients. TSVT/ET can establish multiple LA assay positivity in nonanticoagulated patients negative for one of dRVVT or APTT, and is the only assay pairing insensitive to VKAs, the recommended anticoagulation for APS.

Analytical dilemmas in lupus anticoagulant detection

Accurate lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection is crucial to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis. Detection is based on LA functional behavior in coagulation assays irrespective of epitope specificity. LA screening tests employ dilute phospholipids to accentuate in vitro inhibition by LAs, although they are not LA-specific and can be elevated by other coagulation abnormalities. Elevated screening tests are reflexed to mixing tests to distinguish between factor deficiency and inhibition. Confirmatory tests with high phospholipid concentration swamp LA to generate shorter clotting times than screening tests, whilst prolongation persists with non-phospholipid-dependent inhibitors. LA heterogeneity means that no single screening test detects every LA and the screen/mix/confirm medley must be applied to at least two assay types, usually dilute Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT) and an LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Most laboratories restrict LA testing to these two assays, yet others, such as dilute prothrombin time (dPT), can perform with equal diagnostic efficacy, and additionally detect LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT. Converting clotting times to normalized ratios improves assay performance, and practitioners must choose between normal pooled plasma (NPP) clotting time denominators to reflect on-the-day assay performance, or reference interval (RI) mean clotting times to negate the effects of NPP variation. Cut-offs can be generated parametrically from normally distributed data, or different percentiles applied depending on the preferred balance between sensitivity and specificity. Sourcing sufficient donors for accurate cut-off estimations is problematic and transference exercises can be undertaken on low donor numbers. Analytical limitations of mixing tests have led to the adoption of alternative algorithms to the screen/mix/confirm test order, whilst some continue to rigidly apply the latter despite those limitations. Strategies to reduce or eliminate the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation have limitations, whilst the Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening test with an ecarin time (ET) confirmatory test is insensitive to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct activated factor X anticoagulation.

Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: Taipan Snake Venom Time with Ecarin Time as Confirmatory Test.

Testing for lupus anticoagulants (LA) in the presence of therapeutic anticoagulation is largely discouraged because of the risk of false-positive and false-negative results, although the ability to detect LA in this setting can be clinically valuable. Strategies such as mixing tests and anticoagulant neutralization can be effective, but have their own limitations. The prothrombin activators in venoms from Coastal Taipan and Indian saw-scaled viper snakes provide an additional analytical avenue in that they are insensitive to the effects of vitamin K antagonists and inevitably bypass the effects of direct factor Xa inhibitors. Oscutarin C in Coastal Taipan venom is phospholipid- and Ca2+-dependent, so the venom is used in a dilute phospholipid design as an LA screening test called the Taipan snake venom time (TSVT). The ecarin fraction of Indian saw-scaled viper venom is cofactor-independent and operates as a prothrombin-activated confirmatory test, the ecarin time, because the absent phospholipid precludes inhibition by LAs. Bypassing all coagulation factors except prothrombin and fibrinogen renders the assays innately more specific than other LA assays, while TSVT as a screening test has good sensitivity to LAs detected in other assays, as well as occasional antibodies unreactive in other assays.

Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants.

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) employed in classification, and by default diagnosis, of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Detection of LA is not via calibrated assays but is based on functional behavior of the antibodies in a medley of coagulation assays. A prolonged clotting time in a screening test is followed by demonstration of phospholipid dependence and inhibitory properties in confirmatory and mixing tests, respectively, which are modifications of the parent screening test. Complications arise because no single screening test is sensitive to every LA, and no test is specific for LA, because they are prone to interference by other causes of elevated clotting times. Several screening tests are available but the pairing of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is widely used and recommended because it is proven to have good detection rates. Nonetheless, judicious use of other assays can improve diagnostic performance, such as dilute prothrombin time to find LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT, and the recently validated Taipan snake venom time with ecarin time confirmatory test that are unaffected by vitamin K antagonist and direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulation. Expert body guidelines and their updates have improved harmonization of laboratory practices, although some issues continue to attract debate, such as the place of mixing tests in the medley hierarchy, and areas of data manipulation such as assay cut-offs and ratio generation. This article reviews current practices and challenges in the laboratory detection of LA.

Direct oral anticoagulants‐Remove versus Taipan snake venom time for detection of a lupus anticoagulant in patients taking oral direct factor Xa inhibitors

BackgroundThe optimal method of detecting a lupus anticoagulant (LA) for patients taking direct factor Xa inhibitor (DFXaI) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains controversial. Methods include charcoal adsorption of the DOACs to allow testing with the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), or use of the DFXaI‐insensitive Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) and Ecarin time (ET) assays on neat plasma. ObjectivesThe objective was to compare the utility of APTT and dRVVT analysis following DOAC Remove against TSVT/ET on untreated plasma for LA detection in spiked plasmas and routine clinical samples for patients on DFXaIs. Patients/methodsVarious LA‐negative and LA‐positive samples were assayed by APTT, dRVVT, and TSVT/ET, and then separately spiked with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban calibrators to a concentration of ~190 ng/ml and the assays repeated on spiked plasma before and after DOAC Remove treatment. Testing of 284 consecutive samples from DFXaI‐anticoagulated patients by APTT/dRVVT and TSVT/ET before and after DOAC Remove treatment was undertaken. ResultsIn the spiking model, we found that both TSVT/ET and DOAC Remove strategies generally distinguished LA‐negative and LA‐positive samples, but some false‐positive LA results occurred. In the investigation of 284 consecutive patient samples on DFXaIs, the percentage agreement for LA detection in neat samples tested by TSVT/ET versus APTT and dRVVT after DOAC Remove treatment was 90% (Cohen kappa 0.12). ConclusionOur data highlight uncertainty and disagreement for testing LA in patients on DFXaI. Further studies are required.

International multicenter, multiplatform study to validate Taipan snake venom time as a lupus anticoagulant screening test with ecarin time as the confirmatory test: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BackgroundLupus anticoagulant (LA) assays are compromised in anticoagulated patients, and existing strategies to overcome the interferences have limitations. The prothrombin‐activating Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening test and ecarin time (ET) confirmatory test are innately insensitive to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (DFXaI). ObjectivesValidate standardized TSVT/ET reagents for LA detection, in a multicenter, multiplatform study. Patients/MethodsSix centers from four countries analyzed samples with TSVT/ET from 81 nonanticoagulated patients with LA, patients with established antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and proven persistent LA who were either not anticoagulated (n = 120) or were anticoagulated with VKAs (n = 180) or DFXaIs (n = 71). Additionally, 339 nonanticoagulated LA‐negative patients, and 575 anticoagulated non‐APS patients (172 VKA, 403 DFXaI) were tested. Anticoagulant spiking experiments were performed and 112 samples containing potential interferences (i.e., direct thrombin inhibitors) were tested. Results were evaluated against locally derived cutoffs. Imprecision was evaluated. ResultsCutoffs were remarkably similar despite use of different analyzers and donor populations. Cutoffs for TSVT ratio, ET ratio, percent correction, and normalized TSVT ratio/ET ratio ranged between 1.08 and 1.10, 1.09 and 1.12, 9.3% and 14.8%, and 1.10 and 1.15, respectively. Coefficients of variation for TSVT and ET ratios were ≤5.0%. TSVT/ET exhibited sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 78.2%/95.0%/86.3%/91.5%, respectively, with established APS as the LA‐positive population, and 86.9%/95.0%/76.8%/97.4%, respectively, with triple‐positive APS. Interference was seen with direct thrombin inhibitors, unfractionated heparin, and low molecular weight heparins, but not VKAs or DFXaIs. ConclusionsTSVT/ET are validated for LA detection in nonanticoagulated patients and those on VKAs or DFXaIs.

Taipan snake venom time for antiphospholipid syndrome solves a 20‐year diagnostic challenge

Taipan snake venom time for antiphospholipid syndrome solves a 20‐year diagnostic challenge

Alternative assays to dRVVT and aPTT for lupus anticoagulant detection.

Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are heterogeneous antibodies and no single assay will detect every LA. Consequently, testing is commonly undertaken with both dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-responsive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to maximize detection rates. Although a huge body of evidence attests to the diagnostic utility of these assays, they have limitations that can render them unreliable in certain circumstances. Other assays are available for detecting LA but unfamiliarity, variable availability and technical concerns expressed in guidelines contribute to less usage than dRVVT and aPTT. However, assays such as Taipan snake venom time and Textarin time are insensitive to anticoagulants that compromise dRVVT and aPTT, and assays such as dilute prothrombin time can detect LA unreactive in dRVVT and aPTT. The pros and cons of alternative assays to dRVVT and APTT for LA detection are discussed.

Taipan snake venom time coupled with ecarin time enhances lupus anticoagulant detection in nonanticoagulated patients.

A study is presented which assesses the diagnostic impact of incorporating Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) with ecarin time confirmatory test into an existing dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) repertoire when testing nonanticoagulated patients for lupus anticoagulants. A total of 387 plasma samples from nonanticoagulated patients being investigated for antiphospholipid antibodies were tested for lupus anticoagulant by dRVVT and dilute APTT with confirmatory and mixing tests, and TSVT with ecarin time, with commercially available reagents. All were analyzed on a Sysmex CS2000i automated analyzer. Lupus anticoagulant was not detected by dRVVT, dilute APTT or TSVT screening in 265 of 387 (68.5%) samples. A lupus anticoagulant was detected in 60 (15.5%) samples in dRVVT and/or dilute APTT analysis, but gave normal TSVT ratios. Thirty-nine (10.1%) were positive by TSVT and ecarin time and one or both of dRVVT and dilute APTT testing, whereas a further 23 (5.9%) were only positive in TSVT/ecarin time testing. Most of the lupus anticoagulants manifested in dRVVT and/or APTT analysis, as might be anticipated for this reagent pairing. The samples positive by TSVT/ecarin time only, as has been previously demonstrated, emphasize that the many variables that impact lupus anticoagulant testing mean that even a well established dRVVT and APTT pairing cannot deliver diagnostic certainty. Interference by direct factor Xa inhibitors in dRVVT testing could pave the way for wider adoption of TSVT screening as we gain more evidence of its diagnostic performance.

Commonalities and contrasts in recent guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection.

Updates to guidelines covering lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection have recently been published by the International Society on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (ISTH) and British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH), in 2009 and 2012, respectively. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) published its first LA guideline in 2014. Cross-panel agreement exists on sample manipulation, use of dRVVT analysis, conversion of clotting times to ratios, calculations to demonstrate phospholipid dependence, mixing test interpretation and provision of interpretive reporting. Whilst ISTH restricts assay choice to just dRVVT and activated partial thromboplastin time, BCSH and CLSI consider the case for additional tests. All panels acknowledge the potential for false-negative mixing tests, yet they remain mandated by ISTH and BCSH, the latter, however, indicating that a negative mixing test need not exclude a LA if testing on undiluted plasma is unequivocal. CLSI reprioritizes test order to screen-confirm-mix to reduce false-negative reporting when antibodies are diluted to undetectable levels in mixing tests. Recommendations differ on how to derive cut-off levels, particularly in view of the realities of relatively low donor numbers. Each guideline considers testing of anticoagulated patients, BCSH and CLSI endorsing Taipan snake venom time as a useful supplementary assay in patients on vitamin K antagonists. Although full consensus is not apparent, these publications represent significant moves towards engendering common practices.

Recent Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Detection of Lupus Anticoagulants

The International Society on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (ISTH) and the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) have recently updated their lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection guidelines. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) subsequently will publish its first LA guideline. General agreement exists on issues such as sample preparation, the use of dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) in diagnostic repertoires, the use of normalized ratios, calculations to demonstrate phospholipid dependence, calculations to demonstrate inhibition, and interpretive reporting. The ISTH recommendation to employ only dRVVT and activated partial thromboplastin time is not mirrored in the BCSH and CLSI documents. The potential for false negatives in mixing tests is acknowledged by all panels, yet they remain mandated by ISTH as there are occasions when they are crucial to diagnostic accuracy. BCSH indicates that a negative mixing test need not exclude the presence of a LA, and CLSI reprioritizes test order to screen-confirm-mix, the latter being considered unnecessary in specific circumstances. Opinions in the guidelines differ on setting cutoff levels (i.e., 97.5th vs. 99th percentile for normally distributed data). All guidelines cover testing of anticoagulated patients, more detail being given by BCSH and CLSI, who suggest that Taipan snake venom time is a useful adjunct test in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists. Although complete agreement is not apparent, the guidelines represent significant moves toward engendering common practices.

Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome

This guidance updates and replaces the previous guideline on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) published in 2000 (Greaves et al, 2000), though where there have not been changes we refer back to them when appropriate. The guidance is updated with reference to relevant publications since 2000. Publications known to the writing group were supplemented with additional papers identified by searching PubMed for publications in the last 11 years using the key words: lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, antiphospholipid, b2–glycoprotein I, antiprothrombin and limits (clinical trial, randomized control trial, meta-analysis, humans, core clinical journals, English language). The writing group produced the draft guideline, which was subsequently revised by consensus by members of the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The guideline was then reviewed by a sounding board of approximately 50 UK haematologists, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) Committee and comments incorporated where appropriate. The ‘GRADE’ system was used to quote levels and grades of evidence, details of which can be found at http://www.bcshguidelines.com/BCSH_PROCESS/EVIDENCE_LEVELS_AND_GRADES_OF_RECOMMEN DATION/43_GRADE.html. The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the diagnosis and management of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome though individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach.

The utility of the Taipan snake venom assay in assessing lupus anticoagulant status in individuals receiving or not receiving an oral vitamin K antagonist

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) assay in the detection of lupus anticoagulant in patients receiving or not receiving oral vitamin K antagonists. Blood samples were collected from individuals requiring investigation for the presence of a lupus anticoagulant. The TSVT test was run in parallel with the dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) assay and anticardiolipin antibody assays. Results were assessed by Bayesian statistics. Two thousand and five plasma samples were obtained from 1335 individuals. One thousand, one hundred and eleven individuals were not receiving oral vitamin K antagonists; of these, 451 had a lupus anticoagulant by conventional testing, and the TSVT showed a sensitivity of 22%, specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 80%, negative predictive value of 78%, positive likelihood ratio of 12.3 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.790. Two hundred and ten of the 224 patients receiving oral vitamin K antagonists were known to have a persistent lupus anticoagulant prior to oral anticoagulation. In this setting, TSVT had a sensitivity of 39% and specificity of 93%, but the dRVVT had a 50% false-positive rate, which meant that despite having a higher sensitivity at 61% than the TSVT, its specificity was only 53%. TSVT is a specific but insensitive assay for the lupus anticoagulant in individuals not receiving oral vitamin K antagonists, when assessed against the dRVVT as the gold standard. It can be argued that despite the TSVT's poor sensitivity in patients taking oral vitamin K antagonists, its high specificity and positive predictive value make it a preferable assay to the dRVVT to diagnose lupus anticoagulant in this group.

The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant Assay Detects Clinically Significant Antibodies

Lupus anticoagulants are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies detected by their effects on phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays. Persistent lupus anticoagulants are associated with thrombotic disease, but not all are clinically significant. Antibody heterogeneity and reagent and test variability dictate that at least 2 tests, of different types, should be used to screen lupus anticoagulants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies. Eighty-two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 32 with systemic lupus erythematosus + positive for activated seven lupus anticoagulant and who were without thrombosis, who were positive by activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, were investigated for lupus anticoagulants by dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, and Taipan snake venom time, and for anticardiolipin antibodies. Fifty-seven of the APS patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants in multiple assays, 25 in activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone. Fourteen of the latter group were previously positive in other antiphospholipid antibodies assays, and 11 had only been positive for lupus anticoagulants by activated seven lupus anticoagulant. Twenty-eight had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 of whom were from the group that was positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant only. Eight of the systemic lupus erythematosus + lupus anticoagulants (without thrombosis) patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant by activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone and had only been positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant previously, and none had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. The remaining 24 patients were lupus-anticoagulant positive in multiple assays, and 9 had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. Dilute Russell's viper venom time and Dilute activated partial thromboplastin time are widely used to detect lupus anticoagulants and are considered to detect clinically significant antibodies. Activated seven lupus anticoagulant detected antibodies in APS patients who were positive by these assays and also lupus anticoagulants undetectable by the dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute activated partial thromboplastin time reagents used, demonstrating its utility as a first-line or second-line assay.

Combining Taipan snake venom time/Ecarin time screening with the mixing studies of conventional assays increases detection rates of lupus anticoagulants in orally anticoagulated patients

BackgroundOral anticoagulation compromises conventional lupus anticoagulant (LA) screening assays. Mixing studies can counteract the oral anticoagulant effect but the dilution reduces sensitivity and can generate false negative results. A firm diagnosis can be made from mixing studies when an elevated screen ratio is accompanied by a confirm ratio that generates significant correction to demonstrate phospholipid dependence, but also returns into the reference range, indicating complete normalisation of the oral anticoagulant effect. Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) with Ecarin time (ET) as a confirmatory test comprises an oral anticoagulant insensitive LA detection system and this study investigates the potential impact on detection rates when coupled with mixing studies on standard assays.MethodsEighty patients known to have LA who were receiving oral anticoagulation were tested with TSVT/ET and 1:1 mixing studies with normal plasma by dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) and dilute activated partial thromboplastin time (DAPTT) to assess detection rates by single and multiple assays.ResultsThirty three of the 80 samples from known LA positive patients were positive in all three assays and 15 were positive in combinations of DRVVT, DAPTT or TSVT/ET. The remainder were positive in only one assay; 12 by DRVVT, 4 by DAPTT and 16 by TSVT/ET. Although all DRVVT and DAPTT positive mixing studies generated significant correction of the screen ratio by the confirm ratio, not all confirm ratios corrected back into the reference range. This was the case for 87.5% of the DRVVT results, 44.7% of the DAPTT results and 13.3% of the TSVT/ET positive mixing tests.ConclusionAddition of TSVT/ET screening for LA in orally anticoagulated patients could increase diagnostic efficacy either by detecting antibodies diluted in the mixing tests of conventional assays or those that do not react in DRVVT or DAPTT. Additionally, TSVT/ET can affirm the presence of a LA where conventional assay mixing tests may not have fully counteracted the oral anticoagulant effect but confirmatory test correction suggests the presence of a LA.

The dilution effect of equal volume mixing studies compromises confirmation of inhibition by lupus anticoagulants even when mixture specific reference ranges are applied

Introduction One of the recommended criteria for the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LA) is demonstration of inhibitory activity. This is confirmed by performing mixing tests with normal plasma, usually in a 1:1 ratio, and demonstrating persistence of an abnormal clotting time in the screening test with significant confirmatory test reduction. However, the mixing with normal plasma can dilute the antibodies to undetectable levels and generate apparent negative results. No guidelines or consensus exist in how to interpret mixing study results. Patients and methods The present study assessed the 1:1 mixing study results from 600 patients with a thrombotic history positive for LA demonstrated in neat plasma by individual assays, or combinations, of dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay and Taipan snake venom time, plus confirmatory tests. Mixing tests were assessed initially using locally derived neat plasma reference ranges and subsequently with mixture specific ranges. Results The mixture specific ranges had lower upper limits. Of the total LA positive results, 32.5% were positive in the mixing studies when neat plasma reference ranges were applied, and a further 11.2% demonstrated LA activity when using the mixture specific ranges. The remaining 56.3% had been diluted such that they did not elevate the screening test above the upper limit of normal or generated minimal prolongation with an insignificant difference between the screen and confirmatory test result sufficient to confirm LA activity. Conclusions The significant impact of the dilution effect in 1:1 mixing studies emphasises the limitations of mixing studies as a vehicle for confirmation of inhibition by LA antibodies.

Alteration in the laboratory profile of a lupus anticoagulant in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We describe a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed a lupus anticoagulant (LA) detectable by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) and kaolin clotting time (KCT). IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were elevated. At a later admission, and following treatment for the lymphoma, routine coagulation screening showed an elevated prothrombin time (PT) without correction in mixing tests using a recombinant thromboplastin. Routine APTT was below the reference range and ACA levels were normal. Raw data for one-stage factor assays demonstrated the presence of an inhibitor. Analysis for LA was undertaken by DRVVT, KCT, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, Taipan snake venom time, platelet neutralisation procedures (PNP), Ecarin time and PT using rabbit brain thromboplastin. The results revealed a LA capable of prolonging the clotting times of the PNPs and PT using recombinant thromboplastin, but that was corrected using Ecarin venom, modified PNP and brain thromboplastin. The antibody also demonstrated the lupus anticoagulant co-factor effect. The factor VIII: C was markedly raised which may have masked the LA in the APTT. The changing laboratory profile over time demonstrates the effects of LA heterogeneity and variations in sensitivity and specificity of assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies.

The Taipan snake venom time: a new test for lupus anticoagulant.

To develop a specific test for lupus anticoagulant activity with reduced sensitivity to coagulation factor deficiency that would be suitable for analysis of plasmas from patients receiving oral anticoagulants. A coagulation test based on the Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) with a platelet neutralisation procedure (PNP) was developed and compared with dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT). The TSVT was used to test plasmas from patients receiving oral anticoagulant or heparin with mild liver dysfunction and with documented lupus anticoagulant. The optimised conditions for the TSVT were established and a reference range was determined in normal healthy subjects. Results were considered positive for lupus anticoagulant if the ratio was > or = 1.1 and was reduced by > or = 10% or to < 1.1 in the PNP. In 43 samples from patients receiving oral anticoagulants there was no correlation between level of anticoagulation and TSVT, and only seven samples had increased TSVTs. Of these, five corrected on mixing with normal plasma and two gave equivocal results. The patients with mild liver dysfunction all had normal TSVTs. The TSVT in plasmas from patients receiving heparin correlated with the heparin concentrations (as measured by the APTT, r2 = 0.81). Some anticoagulated plasmas showed correction in the PNP and were regarded as false positive. Fourteen of 17 patients known to have lupus anticoagulant (on the basis of DRVVT results) were also positive by the TSVT; two of the remaining three were borderline and one was negative. The TSVT showed satisfactory intra-assay precision and reasonable sensitivity to lupus anticoagulant, compared with the DRVVT. The TSVT was influenced by the presence of heparin but was not sensitive to the effects of oral anticoagulant. Like other lupus anticoagulant tests, it does not seem to have a 100% detection rate, but this may be due to the presence of lupus anticoagulant subtypes with distinct activities or the requirement of cofactors other than prothrombin or beta 2 glycoprotein-I.