Geosynthetic interlayers in the form of geotextiles, geogrids, and geocomposites have been used to minimize reflective cracks and enhance overlay performance through functions such as stress relief, reinforcement and moisture barrier. However, proper geosynthetic installation and asphalt overlay construction practices are essential to the adequate performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt overlays. In this study, various factors determining the successful construction of a geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt overlay are discussed in light of experiences during the construction of experimental test sections constructed in Texas State Highway 21. The project included nine different types of geosynthetic interlayers including four polymeric geogrid composites, three fiberglass geogrid composites, one fiberglass grid, and a fiberglass paving mat. The experimental test section included both sensor- and non-instrumented sections. The constructability evaluation of such experimental sections revealed that the primary factors influencing tack coat type and application rates include the pre-existing surface condition, geosynthetic type and their asphalt retention capacities. The geosynthetic installation procedures adopted in the experimental sections were proficient and comprised a specialized installation equipment that is capable of pre-tensioning the geosynthetics during the installation to minimize wrinkles and irregularities. Additionally, particularly high temperature of the pre-existing asphalt surface resulted in blistering of geotextile backing and subsequently leading into an excessive bleeding of tack coat through the geosynthetic apertures that resulted in tracking of construction equipment wheels. Recommendations on efficient geosynthetic installation and overlay construction techniques include adopting the tack coat type and application rates based on project-specific conditions, and using such tack coat to determine the asphalt retention capacity of the geosynthetic interlayer to be used in the project. Additional recommendations include minimizing the movement of construction vehicles on top of the geosynthetic interlayer, and adopting asphalt sanding technique to restore the friction between the paver and surface to minimize possible damage to the geosynthetic interlayer.
Read full abstract