TACE Group Research Articles

Prognosis comparison between hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion who received hepatectomy alone and those who underwent early PA-TACE: a retrospective cohort study.

Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) can achieve longer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI). We investigated whether this treatment strategy could benefit these patients by mediating the dysfunctional immunological status. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the effect of early PA-TACE in HCC patients with MVI by measuring the levels of T helper cell 17 (Th17) and regulatory T cell (Treg). This study retrospectively included 472 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy between December 2015 and December 2018, and 115 patients with MVI confirmed by postoperative pathology were enrolled and divided into two groups of TACE group and non-TACE group according to whether TACE was performed. HCC patients with MVI. The proportion of Treg and Th17 cells in peripheral blood was measured one day before and four weeks after TACE. All patients in the two groups were followed up until death or until the study ended in December 2023. The rates of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MVI were compared between those who received hepatectomy alone and those who underwent early PA-TACE. Among 115 HCC patients with MVI from 472 patients, the study enrolled 51 patients with PA-TACE into the TACE group and 42 patients without TACE into the non-TACE group. There were no statistical differences in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). The frequency of Treg among CD4+ T cells in HCC patients with PA-TACE was significantly lower than baseline (7.34%±3.61% vs. 5.82%±2.76%, P<0.001), and the frequency of Th17 among CD4+ T cells in these patients was significantly higher than baseline (0.49%±0.28% vs. 0.50%±0.25%, P<0.001). Among all the patients, the median OS was 61.8 months. The OS rate and PFS rate at 12, 36, and 60 months in the TACE group were significantly higher than those in the non-TACE group (all P<0.05). PA-TACE may have roles in improving survival outcomes, and restoring immune homeostasis in HCC patients with MVI after hepatectomy.

Lipiodol Combined with Drug-eluting Beads Versus Drug-eluting Beads Alone for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular carcinoma: A Multicenter Study

Rationale and ObjectivesThis study aimed to propose a novel approach of lipiodol combined with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (Lipiodol-DEB TACE) and to compare the safety and efficacy with DEB-TACE alone for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and MethodsFrom the database of four centers, the records of patients with HCC who received DEB-TACE or Lipiodol-DEB TACE as initial treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The tumor response was measured based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups. ResultsA total of 244 patients were included with 160 patients receiving DEB-TACE and 84 patients receiving Lipiodol-DEB TACE. Lipiodol-DEB TACE group had higher objective response rate (86.9% vs. 76.3%), higher disease control rate (97.6% vs. 88.8%), longer median OS (42.6 vs. 25.8 months) and longer median PFS (34.0 vs. 17.0 months) than DEB-TACE group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference observed in the incidence of AEs between two groups. Cox analysis identified total bilirubin level, maximum tumor diameter, TACE method and portal vein invasion as independent prognostic factors. ConclusionLipiodol-DEB TACE was a safe option and associated with improved tumor response and survival outcome compared to DEB-TACE alone for selected patients with HCC.

A multi-center retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without TACE as a second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16147 Background: At present, there are no definitive optimal treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following first-line treatment failure. To maximize the survival benefit of patients, we compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with transarterial chemoem bolization (R+ICIs+TACE) versus regorafenib plus ICIs (R+ICIs) as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with advanced HCC from our multicenter who received R+ICIs+TACE or R+ICIs as a later-line therapy from June 2020 to August 2022.Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (m-PFS), and safety were evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(m-RECIST). Factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Results: A total of 78 patients were included in the study (regardless of first-line treatment), including 48 who received R+ICIs+TACE and 30 who received R+ICIs. The R+ICIs+TACE group had a significantly higher ORR (31.6% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.021), higher DCR (73.8%vs. 45.7%, P = 0.008), longer PFS (median 8.5 vs.3.6 months, P &lt; 0.0001) and and a longer OS (14.6 vs 8.5 months, P = 0.024) than those who received R+ICIs group. Child-Pugh class A6 and B7, R+ICIs and extrahepatic metastasis were found as independent prognostic factors for poor PFS. R+ICIs, a-fetoprotein &gt; 400 ng/mL and Child-Pugh class were noted as independent prognostic factors for poor OS.There was no notable difference in the total incidence of treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) (76.8% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.41) and the incidence of grade 3/4 serious adverse effects (6.2% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.21) between the two group. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus ICIs with TACE showed a promising efficacy with favorable safety in HCC patients with PD-1 inhibitor resistance, especially in the standard second line patients.

Safety, efficacy, and survival of different transarterial chemoembolization techniques in the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative single-center analysis

PurposeTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the standard of care for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, current clinical practice guidelines lack consensus on the best selection of a specific TACE technique. This study aims to compare safety, tumor response, and progression-free survival (PFS) of conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), and degradable starch microsphere TACE (DSM-TACE).MethodsThis retrospective study included n = 192 patients with HCC who underwent first TACE with unbiased follow-up at 4–6 weeks at our center between 2008 and 2021. Eligibility for TACE was BCLC intermediate stage B, bridging/down-staging (B/D) to liver transplantation (LT), or any other stage when patients were not suitable for resection, LT, local ablation, or systemic therapy. Patients were grouped into three cohorts (n = 45 cTACE, n = 84 DEB-TACE, n = 63 DSM-TACE), and further categorized by TACE indication (B/D or palliative). Liver function and adverse events, response assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) 4–6 weeks post-TACE and PFS were analyzed.ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, gender distribution, BCLC stage, or etiology of liver disease among the three TACE groups, even in the B/D or palliative subgroups. DEB-TACE induced slight increases in bilirubin in the palliative subgroup and in lactate dehydrogenase in the entire cohort 4–6 weeks post-TACE, and more adverse events in the palliative subgroup. DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE showed significantly higher disease control rates (complete and partial response, stable disease) compared to cTACE, especially in the B/D setting (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups [median PFS (months): cTACE, 10.0 vs. DEB, 7.0 vs. DSM, 10.0; p = 0.436].ConclusionOur study provides valuable perspectives in the decision-making for a specific TACE technique: DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE showed improved tumor response. DEB-TACE showed a prolonged impact on liver function and more side effects, so patients with impaired liver function should be more strictly selected, especially in the palliative subgroup.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Palonosetron Hydrochloride in Preventing Nausea And Vomiting After TACE: A Retrospective Analysis.

To investigate the mechanism of nausea and vomiting after TACE, and analyze the efficacy and safety of palonosetron hydrochloride in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after TACE. The data of 221 patients who underwent TACE in the Department of Intervention Therapy from August 2018 to August 2020 were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: those who did not use palonosetron hydrochloride before TACE (TACE group, N=116); and those who used palonosetron hydrochloride before TACE (TACE+palonosetron group, N=105). Primary study endpoint: The control rate of nausea and vomiting in the two groups at 0-24 h (acute), 24-120 h (delayed), and 0-120 h. Secondary Study Endpoints: Adverse events of palonosetron hydrochloride. TACE group vs TACE+palonosetron group: 0-24 h, 74 vs. 44 patients with nausea (63.8% vs. 41.9%); 24-120 h, 50 vs. 16 patients with nausea (43.1% vs. 15.2%); 0-120 h after TACE, 81 vs. 50 patients with nausea (69.8% vs. 47.6%). 0-24 h, 52 vs. 26 patients with vomiting (44.8% vs. 24.8%); 24-120 h, 24 vs. 8 patients with vomiting (20.7% vs. 7.6%); 0-120 h after TACE, 64 vs. 26 patients with vomiting (55.2% vs. 24.8%). The incidence of nausea and vomiting after TACE was significantly lower in the TACE+palonosetron group than in the TACE group (p < 0.05). Palonosetron hydrochloride can significantly reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients after TACE, with exact effect and high safety.

Study on the comparison of postoperative liver injury caused by hepatic arterial perfusion chemotherapy combined with targeted immunotherapy with hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined with targeted immunotherapy for intermediate-and advanced-stage liver cancer

Objective: To compare the postoperative liver function injury condition in patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and hepatic artery chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods: Patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage HCC who were admitted and treated with HAIC/TACE+ICIs+TKIs therapy at Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from January 2019 to November 2021, with follow-up up to July 2023, were retrospectively enrolled. The results of liver function tests within one week before interventional surgery and on the first day after surgery were recorded. The degree of postoperative liver injury was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). The treatment efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Measurement data were compared between groups using a t-test or a non-parametric rank sum test. Enumeration data were compared between the groups using the χ(2) test or Fisher's exact probability method. The survival condition differences were analyzed by the log-rank method. Results: This study included 82 and 77 cases in the HAIC and TACE groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of gender, age, physical condition score, number of tumors, presence or absence of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh grade, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and combined ICIs and TKIs . The HAIC group had later tumor staging, a greater tumor burden, poorer liver reserve function, and a larger proportion of patients in stage C (81.7% vs. 63.6%), χ(2)=6.573, P = 0.01). There were 53 cases (64.6% vs. 32.5%) with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥ 10cm, χ(2)=16.441, P < 0.001), and more patients had a retention rate of ≥ 10% for indocyanine green (ICG) at 15 minutes (68.3% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.035). The postoperative incidence rate of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin was significantly lower in the HAIC group than that in the TACE group (28.0% vs. 63.6%, χ(2)=20.298, P < 0.001, 54.9% vs. 85.7%, χ(2)=17.917, P < 0.001;40.2% vs. 55.8%, χ(2)=3.873, P = 0.049). The number of patients with postoperative ALBI grade 3 was significantly lower in the HAIC group than that in the TACE group (6.1% vs. 16.9%, χ(2)=4.601, P = 0.032). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative hypoalbuminemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, or increased international standardized ratio between the two groups of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival (7.3 months vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.296) or median overall survival (16.5 months vs. 21.9 months, P = 0.678) between the two groups of patients. Conclusion: The incidence rate of postoperative liver injury is higher in patients with intermediate-and advanced-stage HCC treated with TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs than in patients with HAIC combined with ICIs and TKIs.

Factors associated with increased risk of peritoneal seeding after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis associated with peritoneal seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC, focusing on viable tumors after previous locoregional treatment, including TACE and RFA. Exactly 290 patients (mean age, 67.9years ± 9.74; 223 men) with 383 HCCs (mean size, 15.9mm ± 5.49) who underwent RFA between June 2012 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 158 had history of previous treatment (mean number, 1.3 ± 1.8) with 109 viable HCCs. Cumulative seeding after RFA was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent factors affecting seeding were investigated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Median follow-up was 1175days (range: 28-4116). Seeding incidence was 4.1 (12/290) and 4.7% (17/383) per patient and tumor, respectively. The median time interval between RFA and detection of seeding was 785days (range: 81-1961). Independent risk factors for seeding included subcapsular tumor location (hazard ratio [HR] 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 13.0; p = 0.012) and RFA for viable HCC after previous locoregional treatment (HR 4.5; 95% CI 1.7, 12.3; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis for viable tumors, revealed no significant difference in cumulative seeding rates between the TACE and RFA groups (p = 0.078). Cumulative overall survival rates differed significantly between patients with and without seeding metastases (p < 0.001). Peritoneal seeding after RFA is a rare, delayed complication. Subcapsular-located and viable HCC after previous locoregional treatment are potential risk factors for seeding. Seeding metastases could affect the prognosis of patients who cannot receive local therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Lobaplatin-TACE in the Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin-TACE in treating primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The data of 536 patients who underwent TACE in the interventional department from January 2016 to January 2020 were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic drugs used in TACE.: the epirubicin-TACE group (N = 260) and the lobaplatin-TACE group (N = 276). Primary study endpoint: (1) The tumor response after TACE; (2) The survival rates; Secondary study endpoints:(1) Changes in liver function and blood routine before and after TACE; (2) Occurrence of the post-embolization syndrome and infection after TACE. The ORR was 35.0% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 51.1% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.001). The DCR was 73.1% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 82.2% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.011). The 6-month, 9- month, 12-month, and 15-month survival rates were higher in the lobaplatin-TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.029, p=0.001, p=0.005, p=0.002). mOS: Epirubicin-TACE group,14.8 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,18.6 months (p=0.007). mPFS: Epirubicin-TACE group,9.5 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,12.8 months (P =0.000). There was no statistical difference in ALT, AST, total bilirubin and Leucocyte after TACE between the two groups (p=0.343, p=0.368, p=0.288, p=0.359). The platelet decrease after TACE was more significant in the lobaplatin- TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.046). There was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of abdominal pain, fever and infection after TACE between the two groups (p=0.502, p=0.602, p=0.726). The incidence of vomiting after TACE in the lobaplatin-TACE group was higher than that in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.003). Lobaplatin-TACE has a higher tumor response rate and survival rate. Lobaplatin-TACE is a safe and effective treatment strategy; it is worthy of clinical application.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the Third-Line Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

The liver is the most common site of metastasis in colorectal cancer. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Many patients with colorectal liver metastases require effective subsequent therapy after the failure of standard first-line/second-line therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the third-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. The clinical data of 132 patients with colorectal liver metastases were collected. There were two groups: TACE + Regorafenib group (N = 63); TACE group (N = 69). TACE uses CalliSpheres® drug-loaded microspheres (loaded with irinotecan). Regorafenib is administered at a dose of 120 mg once daily. If the patient is severely intolerable, the regorafenib dose is adjusted to 80 mg once daily. Primary study endpoints were (1) to evaluate the tumor response, ORR, and DCR and (2) to evaluate OS and PFS in the two groups. Secondary study endpoints were (1) to compare the performance status, CEA, CA19-9 after treatment between the two groups and (2) to compare the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. There were significant differences in tumor response, ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS after treatment between the two groups. TACE combined with the Regorafenib group versus the TACE group: ORR (57.1% vs 33.3%), DCR (82.5% vs 68.1%), mOS (18.2 months vs 11.3 months), and mPFS (8.9 months vs 5.3 months). The performance status after treatment was better in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05). The CEA and CA19-9 negative rates after treatment were higher in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05). For the third-line treatment of colorectal liver metastases, the combination of TACE + Regorafenib had better tumor response, OS, and PFS than TACE TACE + Regorafenib combination could be considered as salvage therapy for colorectal liver metastases who failed the first- and second-line standard therapy.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma with stage C.

The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation (TACE-RFA) shows promising efficacy in large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the clinical efficacy and safety of TACE-RFA for large HCC with barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage C are lacking in China. To determine the safety and efficacy of TACE-RFA for large, advanced HCC. Patients of HCC with BCLC stage C who were treated with TACE-RFA or TACE alone at our institute from August 2008 to January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The complications were observed. The associations between overall survival (OS) and treatment method were analysed. Data were collected from 102 HCC patients. Among them, 64 underwent TACE-RFA and 38 underwent TACE. The combination of TACE and RFA was safe. All complications were controllable. The median OS in the TACE-RFA group was significantly longer than that in the TACE group (8.0 mo vs 4.0 mo, P = 0.000). The 6-, 12- and 24-mo survival rates of the combination group were 68.8%, 34.4%, and 10.9%, respectively, while those of the TACE group were 36.8%, 7.9%, and 0% (P < 0.05). TACE-RFA has an advantage over TACE alone in improving OS in large HCC patients with BCLC stage C.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus apatinib vs. TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

ObjectiveTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a common therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while TACE-induced tumor angiogenesis would increase progression and metastasis risk. Besides, apatinib possesses the capability of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Thus, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of TACE plus apatinib compared to TACE alone in HCC patients. MethodsNinety-six intermediate-advanced HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled and classified into TACE plus apatinib group (N = 45) and TACE group (N = 51) based on the treatment. ResultsObjective response rate (68.9% vs. 47.1%) was increased in TACE plus apatinib group than in TACE group (P = 0.031). However, no difference was found in disease-control rate between groups (95.6% vs. 86.3%) (P = 0.167). Progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS (95% confidence interval (CI)): 20.0 (13.2–26.8) vs. 14.0 (8.3–19.7) months) was enhanced in TACE plus apatinib group compared with TACE group (P = 0.030), while no difference was found in overall survival between groups (P = 0.060). Additionally, multivariate Cox's analysis presented that TACE plus apatinib (vs. TACE alone) independently associated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.043, hazard ratio = 0.617). Regarding safety profile, no difference in liver function indexes (albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase) was found after treatment between two groups; meanwhile, only the incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (24.4% vs. 7.8%) was higher in TACE plus apatinib group compared to TACE group (P = 0.025), while no difference was found in other adverse events between two groups (all P > 0.05). ConclusionTACE plus apatinib illustrates a superior efficacy with tolerable safety than TACE alone in intermediate-advanced HCC patients.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone versus combined with microwave ablation for recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: a retrospective comparative study

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation (TACE–MWA) versus TACE alone for the treatment of recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) after resection.Materials and methodsFrom June 2015 to January 2020, a total of 45 patients with recurrent sHCC (size ≤ 3 cm) treated by TACE–MWA or TACE were included in this study. The radiological response at 1-, 3-, 6-month after initial treatment [modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)], progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe TACE–MWA group showed better 1-, 3-, 6-month tumor response rates than TACE group. The corresponding 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 76.5%, 70.6%, and 70.6% for the TACE–MWA group, and 56.1%, 15.0%, and 15.0% for the TACE group (P = 0.003). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100.0%, 82.1%, and 61.5% for the TACE–MWA group, and 89.0%, 58.1%, and 50.8% for the TACE group (P = 0.389), respectively. Moreover, no major complications related to treatment were observed in either of the groups. Compared with the TACE group, the TACE–MWA group had a significantly lower number of re-TACE sessions (P = 0.003).ConclusionsAlthough TACE alone provides equivalent effectiveness for recurrent sHCC in terms of OS rates, TACE–MWA had better 1-, 3-, 6-month tumor response rates and may prolong tumor PFS time.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. A total of 120 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis were divided into the TACE group (receiving TACE treatment, n = 60) and the DEB-TACE group (receiving DEB-TACE treatment, n = 60). At 1 month after treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) in the TACE group and DEB-TACE group were 65.0% (39/60) and 78.3% (47/60), respectively, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (47/60) and 85.0% (51/60), respectively. Three months later, the ORRs in TACE and DEB-TACE groups were 63.3% (38/60) and 75.0% (45/60), and the DCRs were 76.7% (46/60) and 81.7% (49/60). We showed that the 1-year overall survival (OS) in TACE and DEB-TACE groups were 100% (60/60) and 88.3% (53/60), respectively, and the 2-year OS were 78.3% (47/60) and 61.7% (37/60). Further analysis indicated that the OS in the DEB-TACE group was significantly longer than that in the TACE group (P = 0.045). DEB-TACE is effective, safe, and feasible in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, which can effectively improve the survival of patients.

Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Clinical Practice: Temporal Trends and Survival Outcomes of an Iterative Treatment.

BackgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the most frequently applied treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. In this study, we aimed at evaluating whether and how TACE application and repetition, as well as the related outcome, have changed over the last three decades in Italy.MethodsData of 7,184 patients with HCC were retrieved from the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) database. Patients were divided according to the period of diagnosis in six cohorts: P1 (1988–1993), P2 (1994–1998), P3 (1999–2004), P4 (2005–2009), P5 (2010–2014), and P6 (2015–2019). All the analyses were repeated in the overall patient population and in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B patients, who are the subgroup of HCC patients originally supposed to receive TACE according to guidelines. TACE was defined as either the first or the main (more effective) treatment.ResultsThe proportion of patients receiving TACE as first or main therapy declined over time, and less than 50% of BCLC B patients were treated with chemoembolization from P3 onward. Conversely, TACE was widely used even outside the intermediate stage. Survival of TACE-treated patients progressively increased from P1 to P6. Although TACE was performed only once in the majority of patients, there was an increasing proportion of those receiving 2 or ≥3 treatments sessions over time. The overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing repeated treatments was significantly higher compared to those managed with a single TACE (median OS 40.0 vs. 65.0 vs. 71.8 months in 1, 2, and ≥3 TACE groups, respectively; p < 0.0001). However, after a first-line TACE, the adoption of curative therapies provided longer survival than repeating TACE (83.0 vs. 42.0 months; p < 0.0001), which in turn was associated with better outcomes compared to systemic therapies or best supportive care (BSC).ConclusionsDespite a decline in the percentage of treated patients over time, TACE has still an important role in the management of HCC patients. The survival of TACE-treated patients gradually improved over time, probably due to a better patient selection. Iterative TACE is effective, but an upward shift to curative therapies provides better outcomes while transition to systemic therapies and BSC leads to a worse prognosis.

Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Plus Sorafenib Compared to TACE Alone in Transplant Recipients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Institution Experience.

Simple SummaryHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization has shown survival benefits in patients with early to intermediate-stage HCC, becoming the standard of care and recommended treatment modality by most clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this current study was to compare the outcomes of HCC transplant candidates treated at our institution with TACE combined with sorafenib versus TACE monotherapy, which will provide further evidence for clinical practice. This study found that using TACE plus sorafenib is generally well-tolerated and associated with improved overall survival in transplant recipient patients with unresectable HCC. A multi-center and prospective study is needed. Randomized and controlled trials are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization has shown survival benefits in patients with early to intermediate-stage HCC, becoming the standard of care and recommended treatment modality by most clinical practice guidelines. The most recent trials of the TACE plus sorafenib combined therapy in patients with unresectable HCC have yielded inconsistent outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of HCC patients treated with the TACE sorafenib combination as opposed to TACE monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with unresectable HCC who underwent liver transplantation and were treated by either TACE alone or TACE plus sorafenib between July 2008–December 2019. Demographic and clinical data as well as HCC recurrence post-liver transplant (LT) were reported as frequencies and proportions for categorical variables and as the median and interquartile range (IQR) or mean. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were performed for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test or unpaired test was performed for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves present overall patient survival and HCC-free survival. Results: A total of 128 patients received LT, with a median (IQR) age of 61.4 (57.0, 66.3) years; most were males (77%). Within the TACE-only group, 79 (77%) patients met the Milan criteria and 24 (23%) were beyond the Milan criteria, while the TACE plus sorafenib group had a higher proportion of patients beyond the Milan criteria: 16 (64%) vs. 9 (36%); p = 0.01. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the treatment groups approached significance, with 100% DFS in the TACE plus sorafenib group vs. 67.2% in the TACE-alone group, p = 0.07. Five-year patient survival was 77.8% in the TACE plus sorafenib group compared to 61.5% in the TACE-alone group (p = 0.51). However, in patients who met the beyond Milan criteria, those who received TACE alone had a lower average amount of (percent) tumor necrosis on explant pathology (43.8% ± 32%) compared to patients who received TACE plus sorafenib (69.6% ± 32.8%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: This study identified that using TACE plus sorafenib is generally well-tolerated and demonstrated improved overall survival compared to TACE only in transplant recipients with unresectable HCC. A multi-center and prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to substantiate these findings.

In Vivo Comparison of Micro-Balloon Interventions (MBI) Advantage: A Retrospective Cohort Study of DEB-TACE Versus b-TACE and of SIRT Versus b-SIRT.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo the role of the micro-balloon by comparing trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) procedures performed with and without balloon micro-catheter (b-DEB-TACE and DEB-TACE/SIRT and b-SIRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The impact of a balloon micro-catheter on trans-arterial loco-regional treatment was analyzed using non-enhanced post-procedural cone-beam CT (Ne-CBCT) by comparing the attenuation values in the embolized area and the surrounding liver tissue before and after DEB-TACE versus b-DEB-TACE and by comparing 2D/3D dosimetry in single-photon emission computed tomography after SIRT versus b-SIRT, and by comparing the histological count of the beads following orthotopic liver transplantation in the DEB-TACE versus b-DEB-TACE subgroup. We treated 84 HCC patients using trans-arterial loco-regional therapy. Fifty-three patients (26 DEB-TACE and 27 b-DEB-TACE) were analyzed in the TACE group. Contrast, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were all significantly higher in b-DEB-TACE subgroup than DEB-TACE (182.33 HU [CI95% 160.3-273.5] vs. 124 HU [CI95% 80.6-163.6]; 8.3 [CI95% 5.7-10.1] vs. 4.5 [CI95% 3.7-6.0]; 6.9 [CI95% 4.3-7.8] vs. 3.1 [CI95% 2.2-5.0] p < 0.05). Thirty-one patients (24 SIRT and 7 b-SIRT) were analyzed in the SIRT group. 2D dosimetry profile evaluation showed an activity intensity peak significantly higher in the b-SIRT than in the SIRT subgroup (987.5 ± 393.8 vs. 567.7 ± 302.2, p = 0.005). Regarding 3D dose analysis, the mean dose administered to the treated lesions was significantly higher in the b-SIRT than in the SIRT group (151.6Gy ± 53.2 vs. 100.1Gy ± 43.4, p = 0.01). In histological explanted liver analysis, there was a trend for higher intra-tumoral localization of embolic microspheres for b-DEB-TACE in comparison with DEB-TACE. Due to the use of three different methods, the results of this study demonstrate in vivo, a better embolization profile of oncological intra-arterial interventions performed with balloon micro-catheter regardless of the embolic agent employed.

Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined With Sorafenib versus TACE in Patients With BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma – A Retrospective Study

Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma is a heterogeneous group with limited treatment options. TACE has been advocated recently by various study groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if TACE in combination with sorafenib, as well as TACE alone, was safe and efficacious in treating BCLC stage C HCC. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical data of 78 patients with BCLC stage C HCC who received either TACE-sorafenib (TS) combination therapy or TACE monotherapy as their first treatment was done. The two groups were compared in terms of radiological tumor response 1 month after the intervention. The two groups were also compared in terms of time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The disease control rate (44.9% and 25.8%, respectively, P=0.09) was higher in the TScombination group than in the TACE monotherapy group after 1 month of treatment. The TS combination group had significantly superior TTPand OSthan the TACE group (TTP was 4.6 and 3.1 months, respectively, P=0.001), and OS was 10.1 and 7.8 months, respectively, P < 0.001). The TACE-S group had a greater cumulative survival time at 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year than the TACE group (97.9%, 51.1%, 25.7% vs. 90.4%, 51.6%, and 0%, respectively). TS combination therapy in advanced-stage (BCLC-C) HCC significantly improved disease control rate, TTP, and OS compared with TACE alone, without any significant increase in adverse reactions.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization after Radical Hepatectomy in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background: More and more studies have suggested that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with high-risk recurrence factors can benefit the most from postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) for its potential effect in delaying cancer recurrence. However, it remains unclear if solitary HCC (SHCC) patients particularly those without high-risk recurrence factors should also receive PA-TACE. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of PA-TACE in them. Methods: Retrospectively, we enrolled 123 SHCC patients who either received radical hepatectomy alone (No TACE group, n = 39) or followed by PA-TACE (PA-TACE group, n = 84) in our institution. Prognostic risk factors, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. Results: Liver cirrhosis was the only independent risk factor for SHCC patients. Overall, the PA-TACE group had no improved OS (P = 0.977) but worse DFS compared with the No TACE group (P = 0.045). Consistently, in subgroup analysis, SHCC patients with negative microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor size ≤ 5 cm and preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 400 ng/ml had similar OS (P = 0.466, P = 0.864, P = 0.488, respectively) but even worse DFS (P = 0.035, P = 0.040, P = 0.019, respectively) than those in the No TACE group. Besides, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups of SHCC patients with liver cirrhosis (P = 0.342, P = 0.941, respectively). Conclusions: PA-TACE may not improve the long-term survival of SHCC patients, but may even potentially promote their postoperative tumor recurrence, especially for those with MVI-negative, tumor size ≤ 5 cm, and preoperative AFP < 400 ng/ml.

The safety and efficacy of percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of tumor thrombus in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE + PEI) vs. TACE alone for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). A total of 130 HCC patients with PVTT treated from May 2014 to August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 33 patients received TACE + PEI and 97 patients received TACE alone. PVTT was classified according to the Japanese Society of Hepatology; 97 patients had VP3 PVTT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) was 11months (95% CI: 7.8-14.2) in the TACE + PEI group and 6months (95% CI: 5.1-6.9) in the TACE group (p < 0.001), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5months (95% CI: 3.7-6.3) in the TACE + PEI group and 2.5months (95% CI: 2.1-2.9) in the TACE group (p < 0.001). Similar results were seen after PSM. Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with tumors > 5cm in diameter and the VP3 subgroup, TACE + PEI brought a significant survival advantage over TACE alone before and after PSM. In the adverse event analysis, severe abdominal pain and bleeding after operation were seen in more patients in the TACE + PEI group than in the TACE group before PSM (P < 0.05). For HCC patients with PVTT (especially those with tumor diameters > 5cm and grade VP3), TACE combined with PEI for HCC patients with PVTT is safe and may provide better survival outcomes.

Combined Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy (SBRT-IO) vs. TACE in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Propensity Score Matching Analysis

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> We reported the first study of combined stereotactic body radiotherapy and immunotherapy (SBRT-IO) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and found this combination was synergistic and safe. Based on these results, we conducted a propensity score matching analysis to compare the clinical outcome of this combination versus TACE alone. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary center of Hong Kong. Eligible patients were HCC patients, who were unsuitable or refractory to curative surgical interventions. Patients with extra-hepatic vascular invasion or metastasis were excluded. 16 and 202 patients received SBRT-IO and TACE alone respectively. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the differences in patients' demographics and tumor characteristics. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) per modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST version 1.1) and toxicities. <h3>Results</h3> After matching, 16 patients were in the SBRT-IO group and 48 patients in the TACE group with similar baseline characteristics. Median 2 sessions of TACE (range: 1-16) were given in TACE group; for SBRT-IO arm, median dose of 35Gy in 5 fractions (range: 27.5-37.5Gy) was prescribed and median 10 cycles of nivolumab (range: 1-20 doses) were given. The median size of tumor was 10cm (range: 3.4-19.6cm) and 20.3% had portal vein invasion. The 12-month and 24-month PFS were better in SBRT-IO group (93.3% vs. 41.7% and 77.8% vs. 2.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001); the 12-month and 24-month OS were also better in combination arm (93.8% vs. 54.2% and 80.4% vs. 8.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The ORR was 87.5% (CR: 50%, PR: 37.5%) in patients receiving SBRT-IO compared to 11.9% (CR: 2.4%, PR: 9.5%) in those receiving TACE alone (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There were fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events (AE) and treatment discontinuation due to AE in SBRT-IO arm (60.4% vs. 18.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.004; 25% vs. 12.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.295). No classical RILD and treatment-related death was reported in SBRT-IO arm. In multivariate analysis, SBRT-IO was an independent good prognostic factor for OS and PFS (HR of OS = 0.14 [0.30-0.96], <i>P</i> = 0.036; HR of PFS = 0.1 [range 0.03-0.33], <i>P</i> < 0.001) <h3>Conclusion</h3> SBRT-IO resulted in better survival than TACE alone in unresectable HCC. Our results provided strong rationale for studying this combination in prospective trial.