e24102 Background: More than 50% of patients treated with taxane and platinum chemotherapy experience neurotoxic adverse events due to treatment, including neuropathy, hearing loss or cognitive impairment. However, because risk factors and clinical trajectory of these toxicities remain poorly understood, it is not yet clear how or when patients should be screened. Innovative technology, such as tablet-based screening tools, create unique opportunities to capture patient symptoms, better understand potentially long-lasting side effects, and determine when to start either preventive or treatment/rehabilitation options. Methods: We assembled a multidisciplinary team from oncology, nursing, and audiology. IRB permission was obtained to perform a longitudinal observational pilot to assess the feasibility of performing chair-side neurotoxicity screenings in the infusion center of an urban safety net health system. Five infusion center nurses were recruited to collect data using a tablet-based application on 55 patients who met the inclusion criteria including chemotherapy-naive patients and fluent in English. Neuropathy and cognitive impairment were measured by validated standardized subjective scales (the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool, and the Attentional Function Index, respectively) and objective pure-tone audiometry (SHOEBOX Audiometry). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcome data. Results: Baseline assessments were completed on 48/55 patients with 37 completing at least one or up to 6 repeated assessments. All participants had baseline assessments before their first cycle by a chemo-certified RN in the infusion chair. Our sample included 55 adults aged 29 to 81 years, of whom 75% were females. 61% of participants were diagnosed with a gynecologic cancer, and 51% consented to receive Paclitaxel and Carboplatin chemotherapy regimen, 29% consented to receive Cisplatin chemotherapy, the remaining 20% consented to receive Oxaliplatin, Docetaxel, or Carboplatin alone. Significant changes occurred in all 3 symptoms by cycle 6 of chemotherapy with 45% of participants experiencing neuropathy, 13% experiencing a clinically significant change in hearing, and 30% experiencing self-reported cognitive concern by the 6th cycle. Ototoxicity and neurotoxicity scores followed the same trajectory of an increase or worsening in scores over time from cycle 1 to cycle 6. Conclusions: Use of innovative, portable tablet-based screening tool can be effectively used to capture symptoms of neuropathy chair-side as patients undergo chemotherapy. These observations support the need to better assess these approaches so that they can be used to optimize clinical outcomes and patient quality of life.