T1R Family Research Articles

Potential role of the bitter taste receptor T2R14 in the prolonged survival and enhanced chemoresponsiveness induced by apigenin.

Bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are G protein‑coupled receptors originally detected in the gustatory system. More recently, T2Rs have been shown to be expressed in extra‑oral cells eliciting non‑gustatory functions. Emerging evidence has suggested a potential role for T2R signaling in diverse pathophysiological conditions, including cancer. -The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression of T2R14 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to assess its involvement in the anticancer effects induced by apigenin, a natural ligand of T2R14. For this purpose, T2R14 expression was explored in PDAC tumor tissue and tumor‑derived cell lines. Using the cell lines expressing the highest levels of T2R14, its effects on chemoresponsiveness and migration upon activation with apigenin were investigated invitro. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to confirm the expression of the T2R family member T2R14 in PDAC. Patients with relatively high levels of T2R14 expression exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival compared with that of patients with low T2R14 expression. Furthermore, novel functions for apigenin were revealed; notably, apigenin was shown to elicit cytotoxic, anti‑migratory and chemosensitizing effects to 5‑fluoruracil (5‑FU) and to 5‑FU, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin in pancreatic cancer cells. In conclusion, the present study extended the evidence for the anticancer effects of apigenin and strongly indicated the functional relevance of T2R14 in PDAC, even though their respective underlying pathways appear to be independent of each other.

Bitter taste receptor T2R14 detects quorum sensing molecules from cariogenic Streptococcus mutans and mediates innate immune responses in gingival epithelial cells.

Host-pathogen interactions play an important role in defining the outcome of a disease. Recent studies have shown that the bacterial quorum sensing molecules (QSM) can interact with host cell membrane proteins, mainly G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and induce innate immune responses. However, few studies have examined QSM-GPCR interactions and their influence on oral innate immune responses. In this study, we examined the role of bitter taste receptor T2R14 in sensing competence stimulating peptides (CSPs) secreted by cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans and in mediating innate immune responses in gingival epithelial cells (GECs). Transcriptomic and western blot analyses identify T2R14 to be highly expressed in GECs. Our data show that only CSP-1 from S. mutans induces robust intracellular calcium mobilization compared to CSP-2 and CSP-3. By using CRISPR-Cas9, we demonstrate that CSP-1 induced calcium signaling and secretion of cytokines CXCL-8/IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-6 is mediated through T2R14 in GECs. Interestingly, the NF-kB signaling activated by CSP-1 in GECs was independent of T2R14. CSP-1-primed GECs attracted differentiated HL-60 immune cells (dHL-60) and this effect was abolished in T2R14 knock down GECs and also in cells primed with T2R14 antagonist 6-Methoxyflavone (6-MF). Our findings identify S. mutans CSP-1 as a peptide ligand for the T2R family. Our study establishes a novel host-pathogen interaction between cariogenic S. mutans CSP-1 and T2R14 in GECs leading to an innate immune response. Collectively, these findings suggest T2Rs as potential therapeutic targets to modulate innate immune responses upon oral bacterial infections.

Expression analysis of taste receptor genes (T1R1, T1R3, and T2R4) in response to bacterial, viral and parasitic infection in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

Emerging evidence suggests that bitter and sweet Taste receptors (TRs) in the airway are important sentinels of innate immunity. TRs are G protein-coupled receptors that trigger downstream signaling cascades in response to activation of specific ligands. Among them, the T1R family consists of three genes: T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3, which function as heterodimers for sweet tastants and umami tastants. While the other TRs family components T2Rs function as bitter tastants. To understand the relationship between TRs and mucosal immunity in teleost, here, we firstly identified and analyzed the molecular characteristics of three TRs (T1R1, T1R3, and T2R4) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Secondly, by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), we detected the mRNA expression levels of T1R1, T1R3 and T2R4 and found that the three genes could be tested in all detected tissues (pharynx, buccal cavity, tongue, nose, gill, eye, gut, fin, skin) and the expression levels of T1R3 and T2R4 were higher in buccal mucosa (BM) and pharyngeal mucosa (PM) compare to other tissues. It may suggest that T1R3 and T2R4 play important roles in BM and PM. Then, to analyses the changes of expression levels of the three genes in rainbow trout infected with pathogens, we established three infection models Flavobacterium columnare (F. cloumnare), infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ich). Subsequently, by qPCR, we detected the expression profiles of TRs in the gustatory tissues (BM, PM and skin) of rainbow trout after infection with F. cloumnare, IHNV, and Ich, respectively. We found that under three different infection models, the expression of the T1R1, T1R3 and T2R4 showed their own changes in mRNA levels. And the expression levels of the T1R1, T1R3 and T2R4 changed significantly at different time points in response to three infection models, respectively, suggesting that TRs may be associated with mucosal immunity.

Histotopography of α-Gustdusin- and T2R3-Expressing Lymphocytes in Mouse Spleen.

Histotopography of lymphocytes expressing bitter taste receptors of T2R family and α-gustducin (receptor-associated subunit of the G-protein complex) in mouse spleen in the norm and in 48 h after intraperitoneal administration of LPS was studied by the immunohistochemical method. Two populations of immunopositive lymphocytes expressing the above proteins were detected in the spleen; they were located in the marginal zones of lymphoid follicles and periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths. In most α-gustducin-positive lymphocytes, co-expression of α-gustducin and CD19 (B-cell marker) was found. Intraperitoneal administration of LPS significantly increased the number of gustducinergic lymphocytes in periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths. We hypothesize that spleen lymphocytes with gustducin signaling are involved in T-dependent immune response to the blood bacterial polysaccharides.

Metabolic control via nutrient-sensing mechanisms: role of taste receptors and the gut-brain neuroendocrine axis.

Nutrient sensing plays an important role in ensuring that appropriate digestive or hormonal responses are elicited following the ingestion of fuel substrates. Mechanisms of nutrient sensing in the oral cavity have been fairly well characterized and involve lingual taste receptors. These include heterodimers of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the taste receptor type 1 (T1R) family for sensing sweet (T1R2-T1R3) and umami (T1R1-T1R3) stimuli, the T2R family for sensing bitter stimuli, and ion channels for conferring sour and salty tastes. In recent years, several studies have revealed the existence of additional nutrient-sensing mechanisms along the gastrointestinal tract. Glucose sensing is achieved by the T1R2-T1R3 heterodimer on enteroendocrine cells, which plays a role in triggering the secretion of incretin hormones for improved glycemic and lipemic control. Protein hydrolysates are detected by Ca2+-sensing receptor, the T1R1-T1R3 heterodimer, and G protein-coupled receptor 92/93 (GPR92/93), which leads to the release of the gut-derived satiety factor cholecystokinin. Furthermore, several GPCRs have been implicated in fatty acid sensing: GPR40 and GPR120 respond to medium- and long-chain fatty acids, GPR41 and GPR43 to short-chain fatty acids, and GPR119 to endogenous lipid derivatives. Aside from the recognition of fuel substrates, both the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal tract also possess T2R-mediated mechanisms of recognizing nonnutrients such as environmental contaminants, bacterial toxins, and secondary plant metabolites that evoke a bitter taste. These gastrointestinal sensing mechanisms result in the transmission of neuronal signals to the brain through the release of gastrointestinal hormones that act on vagal and enteric afferents to modulate the physiological response to nutrients, particularly satiety and energy homeostasis. Modulating these orally accessible nutrient-sensing pathways using particular foods, dietary supplements, or pharmaceutical compounds may have therapeutic potential for treating obesity and metabolic diseases.

Structural basis for perception of diverse chemical substances by T1r taste receptors

The taste receptor type 1 (T1r) family perceives ‘palatable’ tastes. These receptors function as T1r2-T1r3 and T1r1-T1r3 heterodimers to recognize a wide array of sweet and umami (savory) tastes in sugars and amino acids. Nonetheless, it is unclear how diverse tastes are recognized by so few receptors. Here we present crystal structures of the extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs), the taste recognition regions of the fish T1r2-T1r3 heterodimer, bound to different amino acids. The ligand-binding pocket in T1r2LBD is rich in aromatic residues, spacious and accommodates hydrated percepts. Biophysical studies show that this binding site is characterized by a broad yet discriminating chemical recognition, contributing for the particular trait of taste perception. In contrast, the analogous pocket in T1r3LBD is occupied by a rather loosely bound amino acid, suggesting that the T1r3 has an auxiliary role. Overall, we provide a structural basis for understanding the chemical perception of taste receptors.

On the Emerging Role of the Taste Receptor Type 1 (T1R) Family of Nutrient-Sensors in the Musculoskeletal System

The special sense of taste guides and guards food intake and is essential for body maintenance. Salty and sour tastes are sensed via ion channels or gated ion channels while G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the taste receptor type 1 (T1R) family sense sweet and umami tastes and GPCRs of the taste receptor type 2 (T2R) family sense bitter tastes. T1R and T2R receptors share similar downstream signaling pathways that result in the stimulation of phospholipase-C-β2. The T1R family includes three members that form heterodimeric complexes to recognize either amino acids or sweet molecules such as glucose. Although these functions were originally described in gustatory tissue, T1R family members are expressed in numerous non-gustatory tissues and are now viewed as nutrient sensors that play important roles in monitoring global glucose and amino acid status. Here, we highlight emerging evidence detailing the function of T1R family members in the musculoskeletal system and review these findings in the context of the musculoskeletal diseases sarcopenia and osteoporosis, which are major public health problems among the elderly that affect locomotion, activities of daily living, and quality of life. These studies raise the possibility that T1R family member function may be modulated for therapeutic benefit.

Taste information derived from T1R-expressing taste cells in mice.

The taste system of animals is used to detect valuable nutrients and harmful compounds in foods. In humans and mice, sweet, bitter, salty, sour and umami tastes are considered the five basic taste qualities. Sweet and umami tastes are mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors, belonging to the T1R (taste receptor type1) family. This family consists of three members (T1R1, T1R2 and T1R3). They function as sweet or umami taste receptors by forming heterodimeric complexes, T1R1+T1R3 (umami) or T1R2+T1R3 (sweet). Receptors for each of the basic tastes are thought to be expressed exclusively in taste bud cells. Sweet (T1R2+T1R3-expressing) taste cells were thought to be segregated from umami (T1R1+T1R3-expressing) taste cells in taste buds. However, recent studies have revealed that a significant portion of taste cells in mice expressed all T1R subunits and responded to both sweet and umami compounds. This suggests that sweet and umami taste cells may not be segregated. Mice are able to discriminate between sweet and umami tastes, and both tastes contribute to behavioural preferences for sweet or umami compounds. There is growing evidence that T1R3 is also involved in behavioural avoidance of calcium tastes in mice, which implies that there may be a further population of T1R-expressing taste cells that mediate aversion to calcium taste. Therefore the simple view of detection and segregation of sweet and umami tastes by T1R-expressing taste cells, in mice, is now open to re-examination.

Smallest bitter taste receptor (T2Rs) gene repertoire in carnivores.

Bitter taste reception is presumably associated with dietary selection, preventing animals from ingesting potentially harmful compounds. Accordingly, carnivores, who encounter these toxic substances less often, should have fewer genes associated with bitter taste reception compared with herbivores and omnivores. To investigate the genetic basis of bitter taste reception, we confirmed bitter taste receptor (T2R) genes previously found in the genome sequences of two herbivores (cow and horse), two omnivores (mouse and rat) and one carnivore (dog). We also identified, for the first time, the T2R repertoire from the genome of other four carnivore species (ferret, giant panda, polar bear and cat) and detected 17-20 bitter receptor genes from the five carnivore genomes, including 12-16 intact genes, 0-1 partial but putatively functional genes, and 3-8 pseudogenes. Both the intact T2R genes and the total T2R gene number among carnivores were the smallest among the tested species, supporting earlier speculations that carnivores have fewer T2R genes, herbivores an intermediate number, and omnivores the largest T2R gene repertoire. To further explain the genetic basis for this disparity, we constructed a phylogenetic tree, which showed most of the T2R genes from the five carnivores were one-to-one orthologs across the tree, suggesting that carnivore T2Rs were conserved among mammals. Similarly, the small carnivore T2R family size was likely due to rare duplication events. Collectively, these results strengthen arguments for the connection between T2R gene family size, diet and habit.

The association of bovine T1R family of receptors polymorphisms with cattle growth traits

The three members of the T1R class of taste-specific G protein-coupled receptors have been proven to function in combination with heterodimeric sweet and umami taste receptors in many mammals that affect food intake. This may in turn affect growth traits of livestock. We performed a comprehensive evaluation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the bovine TAS1R gene family, which encodes receptors for umami and sweet tastes. Complete DNA sequences of TAS1R1-, TAS1R2-, and TAS1R3-coding regions, obtained from 436 unrelated female cattle, representing three breeds (Qinchuan, Jiaxian Red, Luxi), revealed substantial coding and noncoding diversity. A total of nine SNPs in the TAS1R1 gene were identified, among which seven SNPs were in the coding region, and two SNPs were in the introns. All five SNPs in the TAS1R2 gene and all three SNPs in the TAS1R3 gene were identified in the coding region. Four SNPs (TAS1R1 g.5081C>T, TAS1R1 g.5110C>A, TAS1R2 g.288A>G, TAS1R2 g.2552T>C) were significantly associated with body height of Qinchuan cattle (P<0.05). The heterozygous genotypes of the four SNPs showed a molecular heterosis on cattle heights at hip cross and sacra. The individuals with different genotypic combinations of the four SNPs had significant association with heights at hip cross and sacra (P<0.05).

Patients with hypogeusia show changes in expression of T2R taste receptor genes in their tongues

Taste receptor genes associated with bitterness belong to the T2R gene family. In this study, we compared the expression of genes of the T2R family in the tongues of patients with hypogeusia to those in healthy subjects and examined the possibility that T2R genes are involved in the pathogenesis of hypogeusia. Prospective clinical and basic study. The control group consisted of 24 healthy people. The patient group consisted of 40 subjects with hypogeusia who were confirmed to have abnormally elevated taste thresholds including that of bitter taste. A tissue sample was collected from each individual by scraping the mucosa on the foliate papillae of the tongue. Total RNA was extracted from each sample and reverse transcribed. The expression of 10 T2R genes (TAS2R40, -R42, -R43, and -R48, and T2R3, -R8, -R9, -R10, -R13, and -R16) was evaluated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Comparison of the frequency of gene expression between the control group and patients with hypogeusia showed that the frequency of expression of six receptor genes were significantly reduced in the hypogeusia patients. In particular, TAS2R40 showed a significant and marked decrease in the frequency of expression regardless of the cause or severity of hypogeusia. Our results suggest that decreased expression of taste-associated genes may be involved in hypogeusia in humans. In addition, the evaluation of taste receptor gene expression may be useful clinically for an objective diagnosis of hypogeusia or to evaluate the severity of the disorder.

G PROTEIN‐COUPLED RECEPTORS

The invention provides human G-protein coupled receptors (GCREC) and polynucleotides which identify and encode GCREC. The invention also provides expression vectors, host cells, antibodies, agonists, and antagonists. The invention also provides methods for diagnosing, treating, or preventing disorders associated with aberrant expression of GCREC.

Bitter Taste Receptor Gene in Patients with Taste Disorders

Objective: Examine changes in the expression of taste receptor genes in patients who had loss of taste and those who had phantogeusia. Method: The subjects of this study consisted of 51 patients with loss of bitter taste and 43 patients with phantogeusia. The control group consisted of 24 subjects. We took specimens by scraping their foliate papillae. T2R family and TAS2R family gene expression was detected using RT-PCR and electrophoresis. Results: The patients with loss of bitter taste showed a significant decrease in the frequency of expression of taste receptor genes T2R8 ( P = .002), 10 ( P = .001), 13 ( P = .003), 16 (pTAS2R40 (p48 ( P = .007) compared with the control group. The frequency of gene expression of TAS2R42 ( P = .008) and T2R3 ( P = .033) were significantly increased in patients with phantogeusia. Conclusion: Expression of some genes was decreased in patients with loss of taste, while expression of other genes was increased in patients with phantogeusia. It was suggested that conflicting changes in taste receptor gene expression were involved in the pathogenesis of the loss of taste and phantogeusia.

The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding

The discovery of the T1R family of Class C G protein-coupled receptors in the peripheral gustatory system a decade ago has been a tremendous advance for taste research, and its conceptual reach has extended to other organ systems. There are three proteins in the family, T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3, encoded by their respective genes, Tas1r1, Tas1r2, and Tas1r3. T1R2 combines with T1R3 to form a heterodimer that binds with sugars and other sweeteners. T1R3 also combines with T1R1 to form a heterodimer that binds with l-amino acids. These proteins are expressed not only in taste bud cells, but one or more of these T1Rs have also been identified in the nasal epithelium, gut, pancreas, liver, kidney, testes and brain in various mammalian species. Here we review current perspectives regarding the functional role of these receptors, concentrating on sweet taste and feeding. We also discuss behavioral findings suggesting that a glucose polymer mixture, Polycose, which rodents avidly prefer, appears to activate a receptor that does not depend on the combined expression of T1R2 and T1R3. In addition, although the T1Rs have been implicated as playing a role in glucose sensing, T1R2 knock-out (KO) and T1R3 KO mice display normal chow and fluid intake as well as normal body weight compared with same-sex littermate wild type (WT) controls. Moreover, regardless of whether they are fasted or not, these KO mice do not differ from their WT counterparts in their Polycose intake across a broad range of concentrations in 30-minute intake tests. The functional implications of these results and those in the literature are considered.

NMDA receptor in intestinal enteroendocrine cell, STC-1

We earlier showed that intestinal STC-1 cells can respond to five basic taste stimuli. Here, we investigated which receptors or channels are involved in the sensing of umami in STC-1 cells. T1R family and metabotropic glutamate receptors were not involved. In contrast, we found that N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are expressed in STC-1 cells by RT-PCR analysis. Using a calcium-imaging technique, we also observed that a specific agonist NMDA induces the increase in the intracellular Ca concentration in STC-1 cells. We also found that pretreatment with NMDA enhances sweet-induced response in STC-1 cells, suggesting important roles of L-Glu-signaling in the chemosensory system of the gastrointestinal tracts.

Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?

Chemosensory receptors convert an enormous diversity of chemical signals from the external world into a common language of electrical activity in the brain. Mammals and insects use several families of transmembrane receptor proteins to recognize distinct classes of volatile and non-volatile chemicals that are produced by conspecifics or other environmental sources. A comparison of the signalling mechanisms of mammalian and insect receptors has revealed an unexpected functional distinction: mammals rely almost exclusively on metabotropic ligand-binding receptors, which use second messenger signalling cascades to indirectly activate ion channels, whereas insects use ionotropic receptors, which are gated directly by chemical stimuli, thereby leading to neuronal depolarization. In this review, we consider possible reasons for this dichotomy, taking into account biophysical, cell biological, ecological and evolutionary influences on how information is extracted from chemosensory cues by these animal classes.

T1R3 is expressed in brush cells and ghrelin-producing cells of murine stomach

Various digestive and enteroendocrine signaling processes are constantly being adapted to the chemical composition and quantity of the chyme contained in the diverse compartments of the gastrointestinal tract. The chemosensory monitoring that underlies the adaptive capacity of the gut is thought to be performed by so called brush cells that share morphological and molecular features with gustatory sensory cells. A substantial population of brush cells is localized in the gastric mucosa. However, no chemosensory receptors have been found to be expressed in these cells so far, challenging the concept that they serve a chemosensory function. The canonical chemoreceptors for the detection of macronutrients are taste receptors belonging to the T1R family; these have been identified in several tissues in addition to the gustatory system including the small intestine. We demonstrate the expression of the T1R subtype T1R3, which is essential for the detection of both sugars and amino acids in the gustatory system, in two distinct cell populations of the gastric mucosa. One population corresponds to open-type brush cells, emphasizing the notion that they are a chemosensory cell type; T1R3 immunoreactivity in these cells is restricted to the apical cell pole, which might provide the basis for the detection of luminal macronutrient compounds. The second gastric T1R3-positive population consists of closed-type endocrine cells that produce ghrelin. This finding suggests that ghrelin-releasing cells, which lack access to the stomach lumen, might receive chemosensory input from macronutrients in the circulation via T1R3.

T1R receptors mediate mammalian sweet and umami taste

The T1R family of taste receptors mediates 2 taste qualities: T1R2/T1R3 for sweet taste and T1R1/T1R3 for umami taste. Functional expression in heterologous system and gene knockout studies has shown their functions as taste receptors. Structure-function relation studies on T1R2/T1R3 showed multiple ligand binding sites on both subunits. The umami taste of l-glutamate can be drastically enhanced by 5′ ribonucleotides, and the synergy is a hallmark of this taste quality. On the basis of chimeric T1R receptors, site-directed mutagenesis, and molecular modeling data, we recently proposed a cooperative ligand binding model that involved the Venus flytrap domain of T1R1 in which l-glutamate binds close to the hinge region and 5′ ribonucleotides bind to an adjacent site close to the opening of the flytrap to further stabilize the closed conformation. This novel mechanism may apply to other class C, G protein–coupled receptors.

The neuropeptides CCK and NPY and the changing view of cell-to-cell communication in the taste bud

The evolving view of the taste bud increasingly suggests that it operates as a complex signal processing unit. A number of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides and their corresponding receptors are now known to be expressed in subsets of taste receptor cells in the mammalian bud. These expression patterns set up hard-wired cell-to-cell communication pathways whose exact physiological roles still remain obscure. As occurs in other cellular systems, it is likely that neuropeptides are co-expressed with neurotransmitters and function as neuromodulators. Several neuropeptides have been identified in taste receptor cells including cholecystokinin (CCK), neuropeptide Y (NPY), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Of these, CCK and NPY are the best studied. These two peptides are co-expressed in the same presynaptic cells; however, their postsynaptic actions are both divergent and antagonistic. CCK and its receptor, the CCK-1 subtype, are expressed in the same subset of taste receptor cells and the autocrine activation of these cells produces a number of excitatory physiological actions. Further, most of these cells are responsive to bitter stimuli. On the other hand, NPY and its receptor, the NPY-1 subtype, are expressed in different cells. NPY, acting in a paracrine fashion on NPY-1 receptors, results in inhibitory actions on the cell. Preliminary evidence suggests the NPY-1 receptor expressing cell co-expresses T1R3, a member of the T1R family of G-protein coupled receptors thought to be important in detection of sweet and umami stimuli. Thus the neuropeptide expressing cells co-express CCK, NPY, and CCK-1 receptor. Neuropeptides released from these cells during bitter stimulation may work in concert to both modulate the excitation of bitter-sensitive taste receptor cells while concurrently inhibiting sweet-sensitive cells. This modulatory process is similar to the phenomenon of lateral inhibition that occurs in other sensory systems.

Genetic Variation in Taste and Its Influence on Food Selection

Abstract Taste perception plays a key role in determining individual food preferences and dietary habits. Individual differences in bitter, sweet, umami, sour, or salty taste perception may influence dietary habits, affecting nutritional status and nutrition-related chronic disease risk. In addition to these traditional taste modalities there is growing evidence that "fat taste" may represent a sixth modality. Several taste receptors have been identified within taste cell membranes on the surface of the tongue, and they include the T2R family of bitter taste receptors, the T1R receptors associated with sweet and umami taste perception, the ion channels PKD1L3 and PKD2L1 linked to sour taste, and the integral membrane protein CD36, which is a putative "fat taste" receptor. Additionally, epithelial sodium channels and a vanilloid receptor, TRPV1, may account for salty taste perception. Common polymorphisms in genes involved in taste perception may account for some of the interindividual differences in food preferences and dietary habits within and between populations. This variability could affect food choices and dietary habits, which may influence nutritional and health status and the risk of chronic disease. This review will summarize the present state of knowledge of the genetic variation in taste, and how such variation might influence food intake behaviors.