T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma Research Articles

The prognostic value of visible hematuria is only significant in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

ObjectivesTo investigate the prognostic value of visible hematuria in T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and methodsIn the RCC database of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital Department of Urology, we assembled the records of patients with unilateral RCC over 18 years of age diagnosed between 2008 and 2019. The clinical stage was cT1, and the tumors ranged in size from 0 to 7 cm. The primary treatments were partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN). Logistic regression analysis, Cox regression, interaction analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to study the correlation between visible hematuria and progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsA total of 7,610 patients with cT1 RCC comprised the study population, including 505 RCC patients with visible hematuria. The average follow-up time was 64.6 months (range: 12–144 months). Visible hematuria was significantly associated with the prognosis (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7, P < 0.001; CSS, HR = 4.2, P < 0.001) of T1a RCC, but was more significant for CSS in cases of a tumor size ≤ 2 cm (HR = 26.8, P = 0.026). This effect was not significant in T1b RCC (PFS, HR = 0.7, P = 0.153; CSS, HR = 1.1, P = 0.862). The interaction between visible hematuria and tumor size was significant (P = 0.001).ConclusionsThis study showed that visible hematuria was an independent risk factor for PFS and CSS in T1a RCC. The predictive value of visible hematuria for CSS was more significant in RCCs ≤ 2 cm, but did not reach statistical significance in T1b RCC. T1a RCC patients with visible hematuria should be intensively monitored during follow-up.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic Pathological T3a Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundTo establish a nomogram predicting postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of pathological T3a (pT3a) stage undergoing nephrectomy. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review included 668 patients with pT3a RCC between 2008 and 2019, randomly divided into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Cox regression analysis established the RFS-predicting nomogram in the training group. Nomogram performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. ResultsOf the 668 patients with pT3a RCC, 167 patients experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, tumor size, ISUP grade, necrosis, capsular invasion, pT3a invasion pattern were identified as the significant predictors for RFS to establish the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.753 (95% CI, 0.710-0.796) and 0.762 (95% CI, 0.701-0.822) for the training and validating group, respectively. The areas under the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year RFS receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.814, 0.769 and 0.768, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed the optimal application of the model in clinical decision-making. Patients with low risk T3a RCC have better RFS than those with high risk T3a RCC. ConclusionTumor size, ISUP grade, necrosis, capsular invasion and T3a invasion patterns were independent risk factors for worse RFS in patients with nonmetastatic pT3a RCC. The current nomogram could effectively predict the RFS of patients with nonmetastatic pT3a RCC.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Therapy versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Early-Stage Renal Tumors.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation therapy (MWAT) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in early-stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) classified as T1a; a retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated between January 2017 and November 2023. Oncological outcomes, radiological recurrence, length of stay (LOS), and costs were evaluated. The study included 110 patients, with no significant differences between the two groups regarding residual tumors, local tumor progression, and disease-free survival rates (p > 0.05). The LPN group showed significantly lower pre/postoperative serum urea and creatinine and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate values, whereas the MWA group experienced significantly lower mean costs, complication rates, LOS in the hospital, and procedure durations (p ≤ 0.05). However, post-procedure residual tumors and local tumor progression rates did not differ significantly between the LPN and MWAT groups (p > 0.05). MWAT is as effective as LPN for T1a RCC lesions. In addition, MWAT has lower costs than LPN and is a cost-effective treatment method. Therefore, MWAT minimizes hospital stay and complications and since the oncological results are similar to LPN, it might be considered as the first choice of treatment in young patients.

Predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in T1a renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the INMARC (International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer) database

ObjectiveStage migration in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to an increasing proportion of diagnosed small renal masses. Emerging knowledge regarding heterogeneity of RCC histologies and consequent impact on prognosis led us to further explore outcomes and predictive factors in surgically-treated T1a RCC. MethodsThe INMARC database was queried for T1aN0M0 RCC. Patients were stratified into groups based on recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed for factors associated with recurrence, cancer-specific (CSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM). Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) assessed survival by histology and grade. Subset analysis for time to recurrence was conducted for grade and histologic groups and compared with recent AUA follow-up guidelines [low-risk (AUA-LR), intermediate-risk (AUA-IR), high-risk (AUA-HR), and very-high risk (AUA-VHR) groups]. ResultsWe analyzed 1,878 patients (median follow-up 35.2 months); 101 (5.4%) developed recurrence. MVA for recurrence demonstrated increasing age (P = 0.026), male sex (P = 0.043), diabetes (P = 0.007), high/unclassified grade (P < 0.001–0.007), and variant histology (P = 0.017) as independent risk factors for increased risk, while papillary (P = 0.016) and chromophobe (P = 0.049) were associated with decreased risk. MVA identified high/unclassified grade (P = 0.003–0.004) and pT3a upstaging (P = 0.043) as predictive factors for worsened risk of CSM while papillary (P = 0.034) was associated with improved risk. MVA for ACM demonstrated increasing age (P < 0.001), non-white (P < 0.001), high-grade (P = 0.022), variant histology (P = 0.049), recurrence (P = 0.004), and eGFR<45 at last follow-up (P < 0.001) to be independent risk factors. KMA comparing clear cell, chromophobe, papillary, and variant RCC revealed significant differences for 5-year CSS (P = 0.018) and RFS (P < 0.001), but not OS (P = 0.34). Median time to recurrence was 23.8 months for low-grade (AUA-LR), 17.3 months for high-grade (AUA-IR), 18 months for pT3a upstaging (AUA-HR), and 12 months for variant histology (AUA-VHR; P < 0.001). ConclusionWe noted differential outcomes in T1a RCC based on histology and grade for recurrence and CSM, while renal functional decline in addition to pathological factors and recurrence were predictive for ACM. Our findings support recently promulgated AUA follow-up guidelines for low-grade and variant histology pT1a RCC, but call for consolidation of follow-up protocols for high-grade pT1a and pT3a upstaged patients, with intensification of frequency of imaging follow-up in pT1a high-grade RCC.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on renal cancer care

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) care in the Netherlands.MethodsNewly diagnosed RCCs between 2018 and 2021 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry; 2020–2021 was defined as COVID period and 2018–2019 as reference period. Numbers of RCCs were evaluated using 3-week-moving averages, overall and by disease stage and age. Changes in treatment were evaluated with logistic regression analyses. To evaluate possible delays in care, time to start of treatment was assessed. The cumulative number of metastatic RCC (mRCC) over time was assessed to evaluate stage shift.ResultsDuring the 1st COVID wave (weeks 9–22, 2020), the number of new RCC diagnoses decreased with 15%. Numbers restored partially in 2020, but remained 10% lower compared to 2018/2019. The decline was mostly due to a drop in T1a/T1b RCCs and in age > 70 years. 2021 showed similar numbers of new RCC diagnoses compared to 2018/2019 without an increase due to previously missed RCCs. Treatment-related changes during the 1st COVID wave were limited and temporarily; less surgery in T1a RCCs in favor of more active surveillance, and in mRCC targeted therapy was preferred over immunotherapy. Time to start of firstline treatment was not prolonged during the 1st COVID wave. No increase in mRCC was found until the end of 2021.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fewer RCC diagnoses, especially T1a/T1b tumors. Treatment-related changes appeared to be limited, temporarily and in accordance with the adapted guidelines. The diagnostic delay could lead to more advanced RCCs in later years but there are no indications for this yet.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Focusing Upon Long-Term Follow-Up of Oncologic Outcomes.

To retrospectively compare long-term oncologic outcomes of percutaneous computed tomography-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for the treatment of stage 1 (T1a and T1b) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Institutional database research identified all T1 RCC patients who underwent either MWA or RAPN. Models were adjusted with propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the oncologic outcomes. Patient and tumor characteristics, technical success as well as oncologic outcomes were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. After propensity score matching, a total of 71 patients underwent percutaneous MWA (mean age 70 ± 10years) and 71 underwent RAPN (mean age 60 ± 9years). At 8-year follow-up, the estimated survival rates for MWA cohort were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95-100%) for overall survival, 97% (95% CI 93-100%) for recurrence-free survival, and 97% (95% CI 93-100%) for metastasis-free survival. The matched cohort that underwent RAPN exhibited survival rates of 100% (95% CI 100-100%) for overall survival, 98% (95% CI 94-100%) for recurrence-free survival, and 98% (95% CI 94-100%) for metastasis-free survival. After performing log-rank testing, these rates were not significantly different (p values of 0.44, 0.67, and 0.67, respectively). The results of the present study suggest that both MWA and RAPN are equally effective in terms of oncologic outcome for the treatment of T1 RCC.

Effect of lesion dimension on survival in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma who underwent deferred surgery.

Small renal masses (SRMs) have been shown to have low malignant potential. Active surveillance (AS), typically characterized by regular follow-up and delayed nephrectomy if necessary, is recommended as an option for frail patients with SRMs. Nevertheless, the impact of tumor size on survival in T1a RCC patients undergoing delayed nephrectomy for SRMs remains unclear. Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic T1a RCC who underwent nephrectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into immediate (< 6months) and delayed nephrectomy (≥ 6months) groups based on the duration from diagnosis to nephrectomy. After propensity score matching (PSM), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated by K-M curves and compared with log-rank test. A total of 27,502 patients were enrolled, of whom 26,915 (97.9%) received immediate nephrectomy and 587 (2.1%) received delayed nephrectomy. After PSM, 1174 patients who underwent immediate nephrectomy and 587 patients who underwent delayed nephrectomy were included. With a median delay of 7months, delayed nephrectomy resulted in non-inferior OS for RCC tumors sized 0.1-2.0cm (HR = 1.12, p = 0.636). However, for RCC tumors sized 2.1-3.0cm (HR = 1.60, p = 0.008) and 3.1-4.0cm (HR = 1.89, p < 0.001), delayed nephrectomy showed inferior OS compared to immediate nephrectomy. Delayed nephrectomy did not result in significantly worse CSS than immediate nephrectomy in all tumor size subgroups (all p > 0.05), however this may be due to sample size limiting statistical power. Based on the SEER database, we found that with a median delay of 7months, 2cm may be an appropriate cut-off point of delayed nephrectomy for patients diagnosed with non-metastatic T1a RCC.

Cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy versus partial nephrectomy.

Radiotherapy (RT) represents a treatment option for small renal masses with proven feasibility and tolerability. However, it has never been directly compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as an endpoint. Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with RT or PN. We relied on 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, tumor size and histology. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied to a subset of patients with tumor size 21-40mm. Of 40,355 patients with T1aN0M0 RCC, 40,262 underwent PN (99.8%) vs 93 underwent RT (0.2%). RT patients were older (median age 72 vs 60years, p < 0.001) and harbored larger tumor size (median size 28 vs 25mm, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of non-clear cell RCC (49% vs 22%, p < 0.001). After 1:1 PSM (92 RT versus 92 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots' derived CSM was 21.3 vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, p < 0.001). In the subgroup with tumor size 21-40mm, after 1:1 PSM (72 RT versus 72 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots derived CSM was 21.3% vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT also independently predicted higher CSM (HR 4.7, p = 0.001). In T1aN0M0 RCC patients, relative to PN, RT is associated with significantly higher absolute and relative CSM, even in patients with tumor size 21-40mm.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a renal cell carcinomas: A 10-year single-center retrospective review.

Partial nephrectomy is currently the preferred treatment option for T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCC), with nephron-sparing techniques, including microwave ablation, becoming more common in select patients. Primary aims are to document outcomes of microwave ablation for T1a RCCs in an Australian tertiary centre to add to the evidence for its safety and efficacy. The prospectively maintained Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Interventional Radiology database was retrospectively searched for all Renal Microwave ablations completed between June 2012 and February 2022. This database and a combination of hospital programmes including Agfa Impax PACS, Bossnet digital medical record and iSoft Clinical Manager were used to extract the relevant data which was anonymized and entered into an Excel spreadsheet for analysis. Forty-eight patients underwent microwave ablation for 50 tumours. Of these, there were two local and two distant recurrences. A fifth patient had metastases on presentation. Higher local recurrence rates were associated with larger tumour size (P = 0.043). Tumour proximity to the collecting system <4 mm was associated with higher rates of complications (P = 0.020). RENAL scores did not show statistically significant correlation with complications (P = 0.092) or local or distant recurrence. Notably, the study follow-up time was longer than many comparative studies (mean = 2796, ~7.66 years censoring for death and mean = 832 days, ~2.28 years not censoring for death). Consistent with the literature, this study further demonstrates that microwave ablation is a safe and efficacious option for treatment of T1a RCC.

Multiple factors influence decision making for the surgical treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Surgical strategy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is considered based on the renal function. Partial nephrectomy (PN) preserves kidney function better than radical nephrectomy (RN), lowering risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim was to evaluate whether renal function and other clinical variables were important for surgical treatment selection. Patients with RCC, surgically treated between 1994 and 2018 were included. There were 663 patients in all stages, 265 women and 398 men, mean age 66 years. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), WHO performance status (WHO-PS), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), surgery, T-stage, M-stage, RCC type, tumor size, age, and gender were extracted from the medical records. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U, X2-test, and logistic regression analysis. Of 663 patients, 455 were treated with RN and 208 with PN. In all patients, preoperative eGFR was significantly higher in PN (80.8) than in RN (77.1, p = 0.015). Using logistic regression tumor size (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.98, T-stage (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.65), WHO-PS (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.04-0.57), and CCI (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), associated to treatment selection, while eGFR, M-stage, age, and gender did not. In cTa subgroup, eGFR was also higher in PN (84.6) than in RN (75.0, p = 0.007). Using logistic regression, tumor size (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) and WHO-PS (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.66) associated to treatment selection, while eGFR, CCI, age, and gender did not. Tumor size, CCI scores, T-stage, and WHO-PS, all had an impact on the surgical strategy for all RCC patients. In patients with T1a RCC, tumor size and WHO-PS associated independently with treatment decision. After adjusted analysis, renal function lost its independent association with the treatment strategy in RCC patients.

Effect of rechallenge nivolumab in a hemodialysis patient with multiple metastases from a rapidly progressed T1a renal clear cell carcinoma: An autopsy case

IntroductionDistant metastasis of T1a renal cell carcinoma is rare and whether metastasis is more probable in patients undergoing hemodialysis remains unclear. We report the autopsy case of a patient undergoing hemodialysis with multiple metastases that rapidly progressed from T1a renal cell carcinoma treated with multimodal therapy including nivolumab.Case presentationA 70‐year‐old male who underwent hemodialysis was diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma (pT1a, G2) after nephrectomy. Six months post‐surgery, bone and lung metastases appeared and treated with radiotherapy and pazopanib, respectively. Nivolumab was administered as second‐ and fourth‐line treatments for lung metastases. The patient died approximately 60 months after initial diagnosis; however, nivolumab controlled disease progression for 24 months. An autopsy revealed the lung's occupation with clear cell carcinoma tumor tissue.ConclusionNivolumab has potential to control lung metastasis progression. Additionally, rechallenge is possible in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis.

Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics.

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.

Comparing Oncologic Outcomes of Heat-Based Thermal Ablation and Cryoablation in Patients With T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the SEER Database

Comparing Oncologic Outcomes of Heat-Based Thermal Ablation and Cryoablation in Patients With T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the SEER Database

Preserving Renal Function without Compromising Oncological Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Partial and Total Nephrectomies in T3 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) in locally advanced, stage T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to review the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with T3a RCC who underwent PN. We included all patients with pT3a stage RCC undergoing either open, laparoscopic, or robotic PN at our center between January 2015 and 2023. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was utilized to compare nephrectomy types (radical nephrectomy [RN] vs PN). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and a log-rank test. P-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the RN and PN groups, except age (53.0 vs 6.5, respectively; P = 0.012) and body mass index (28.7 vs 34.3, respectively; P = 0.020). Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence (P = 0.597), metastatic progression (P = 0.129), and chemotherapy use (P = 0.367) between nephrectomy types. Patient survival did not differ significantly based on the type of nephrectomy (log-rank P-value = 0.852). Together, our findings indicated that PN and RN yield near-equivalent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival rates among pT3a RCC patients during a nearly 3-year follow-up period.

Other-Cause Mortality, According to Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy: Age and Stage Analyses

IntroductionWe tested the association between other-cause mortality and partial vs. radical nephrectomy in patients with T1a, T1b, and T2 renal cell carcinoma, across all patient ages. Material and MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), patients with localized renal cell carcinoma stages (T1a-T1b-T2, N0, M0), who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy were identified. Only patients with tumor size 2 to 10 cm were included. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models were used. ResultsOf 68,195 patients, 28,845 (42%) underwent partial nephrectomy vs. 39,350 (58%) radical nephrectomy. In T1a patients, 5-year other-cause mortality rates were 6% for partial nephrectomy vs. 11% for radical nephrectomy (Δ=5%). In T1a patients, partial nephrectomy independently predicted lower other-cause mortality, across all ages (HR: 0.73, P < .001). In age category subgroup analyses addressing T1a patients, in all age categories, partial nephrectomy invariably predicted lower other-cause mortality than radical nephrectomy: ≤59 years (HR: 0.67, P < .001); 60 to 69 years (HR: 0.70, P < .001); and ≥70 years (HR: 0.79, P < .001). Finally, in T1b patients, as well as in T2 patients, no other-cause mortality advantage was recorded for partial vs. radical nephrectomy: T1b (8 vs. 10%, Δ=2%); T2 (8 vs. 9%, Δ=1%). ConclusionsRelative to radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy is associated with lower other-cause mortality in stage T1a renal cell carcinoma patients across all age categories, including the oldest patients. Conversely, no clinically meaningful other-cause mortality benefit was associated with partial nephrectomy in stages T1b or T2, regardless of age, including youngest patients.

Usefulness of renal nephrometry scoring systems in the prediction of complications associated to percutaneous image-guided treatment for small renal masses

IntroductionDue to their increasing prevalence and complex management, renal tumors are challenging for health professionals. The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometry scores in the prediction of complications after percutaneous cryoablation. Material and methodsThe study prospectively analyzed 90 patients with 101 stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors treated with cryoablation. ResultsNinety patients with 101 small renal tumors who received cryoablative therapy were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 68 years and 74.4% were male. Most tumors were smaller than 4 cm (89.1%) and the mean PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were 8.65 and 7.35, respectively. Complications were observed in 12 cases. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores demonstrated moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.58 and AUC = 0.63, respectively) for post-cryoablation complications. ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for small renal tumors. The R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA renal nephrometry scores have moderate predictive power for complications associated with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors.

Impacto de los sistemas de nefrometría renal en la valoración de las complicaciones en el tratamiento percutáneo guiado por imagen de las masas renales de pequeño tamaño

IntroductionDue to their increasing prevalence and complex management, renal tumors are challenging for health professionals. The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometry scores in the prediction of complications after percutaneous cryoablation. Material and methodsThe study prospectively analyzed 90 patients with 101 stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors treated with cryoablation. ResultsNinety patients with 101 small renal tumors who received cryoablative therapy were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 68 years and 74.4% were male. Most tumors were smaller than 4 cm (89.1%) and the mean PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were 8.65 and 7.35, respectively. Complications were observed in 12 cases. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores demonstrated moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.58 and AUC = 0.63, respectively) for post-cryoablation complications. ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for small renal tumors. The R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA renal nephrometry scores have moderate predictive power for complications associated with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors.

Renal Abscess Complicated by Renal Vein Thrombosis Mimicking Clinical Stage T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal abscesses accompanied by a renal vein thrombosis (RVT) may have a similar appearance to clinical stage T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on computed tomography (CT) imaging. RVTs are rare clinical findings that more commonly occur in adults with malignant renal tumors or nephrotic syndrome. A 71-year-old woman with risk factors for both renal infection and RCC was found to have a heterogeneous mass with irregular borders and areas of contrast enhancement on CT imaging. A two-week course of antibiotic and anti-coagulant treatment was prescribed with close follow-up. Urine culture eventually grew greater than 100,000 colonies of Escherichia coli. Repeat imaging after six weeks revealed resolution of the mass and the RVT. This patient's case emphasizes that although the findings of RVT and renal mass more commonly point to the diagnosis of malignancy, infections many present in a similar manner but require substantially different treatment. Close follow-up with repeat imaging is imperative to differentiate malignancy from infection or other causes.

Efficacy of Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Unpredicted pT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: To compare the oncological outcomes between patients with pathologic T3a (pT3a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with pT3a N0 M0 RCC who underwent PN and RN between 2001 and 2012. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression models.Results: A total of 41 recurrences (27.5%) and 24 cancer related death (16.1%) were observed during a median follow-up of 136 months (interquartile range, 77–163 months). We observed no significant differences in the RFS and CSS between the PN and RN (RFS: 85.4±64.0 months vs. 75.9±52.8 months, p=0.061; CSS: 153.2±52.5 months vs. 124.9±59.8 months, p=0.292). The surgical method did not affect the tumor recurrence and patients’ survival. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only tumor size remained associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.237; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.132–1.350; p&lt;0.001) and CSS (HR, 1.156; 95% CI, 1.027–1.302; p=0.017).Conclusions: Due to the large tumor size, there may be hesitation in performing PN concerning pT3a in postoperative biopsy. Our study findings suggest that since tumor size is the only prognostic factor, PN can be performed in pT3a as long as there is no thrombus in the renal vein.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for renal cell carcinoma: evaluating the performance of nephrometry scores.

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the performance of RENAL and mRENAL scores, in the prediction of oncological outcomes in patients treated with microwave ablation (MWA) for (T1) renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Institutional database retrospective research identified 76 patients with a biopsy-proven solitary T1a (84%) or T1b (16%) RCC; all patients underwent CT-guided MWA ablation. Tumor complexity was reviewed by calculating RENAL and mRENAL scores. The majority of the lesions were exophytic (82.9%), with > 7mm nearness to the collecting system (53.9%), located posteriorly (73.6%), and lower to polar lines (61.8%). Mean RENAL and mRENAL scores were 5.7 (SD = 1.9) and 6.1 (SD = 2.1) respectively. Progression rates were significantly higher with greater tumor size (> 4cm), with < 4mm nearness to the collecting system, for tumors crossing a polar line and with the anterior location. None of the above was associated with complications. RENAL and mRENAL scores were significantly higher in patients with incomplete ablation. The ROC analysis showed the significant prognostic ability of both RENAL and mRENAL scores for progression. In both scores, the optimal cut-off point was 6.5. Univariate Cox regression analysis for progression showed a hazard ratio of 7.73 for the RENAL score and 7.48 for the mRENAL score. The results of the present study show that the risk of progression was higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score of > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location. CT-guided percutaneous MWA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of T1a renal cell carcinomas.Different morphometric parameters of RCC tumors includingRENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, size, proximity to the collecting system, and crossing of polar linesimpact the efficacy of MWA and progressionsurvival rates. • The risk of progression is higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location. • The significant prognostic ability of the mRENAL score for progression was higher than the respective of the RENAL score. • Complications were not associated with any of the above factors.