Study Objective To visualize the surface area covered by a T-shaped IUD versus that of a pediatric-sized foley catheter following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's Syndrome. Design Visual demonstration of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with scissors, followed by the insertion of either a copper-T IUD or a size 8 Foley catheter. Setting N/A. Patients or Participants Case series (2 patients). Interventions Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed with 5F hysteroscopic scissors, starting from the most distal adhesions and progressively moving towards the uterine fundus. In Case 1, a copper-T IUD was inserted with the copper coil removed to prevent unwanted inflammatory effects. In Case 2, a size 8 Foley catheter was inserted, and the balloon progressively inflated with 1ml, 2ml, and finally 3mL of sterile water. Measurements and Main Results The copper-T IUD covered a much smaller proportion of the endometrial cavity compared to that covered by the inflated foley catheter. Conclusion This video visually demonstrates the relatively small surface area occupied by the T-shaped IUD compared to the area covered by a pediatric-sized Foley catheter. A Foley catheter with the balloon inflated with at least 3mL of sterile water occupies more space and therefore can separate the endometrial walls much more effectively than a T-shaped device, potentially contributing to less IUA formation. Further research comparing these two alternatives in the prevention of IUA reformation are necessary. To visualize the surface area covered by a T-shaped IUD versus that of a pediatric-sized foley catheter following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's Syndrome. Visual demonstration of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with scissors, followed by the insertion of either a copper-T IUD or a size 8 Foley catheter. N/A. Case series (2 patients). Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed with 5F hysteroscopic scissors, starting from the most distal adhesions and progressively moving towards the uterine fundus. In Case 1, a copper-T IUD was inserted with the copper coil removed to prevent unwanted inflammatory effects. In Case 2, a size 8 Foley catheter was inserted, and the balloon progressively inflated with 1ml, 2ml, and finally 3mL of sterile water. The copper-T IUD covered a much smaller proportion of the endometrial cavity compared to that covered by the inflated foley catheter. This video visually demonstrates the relatively small surface area occupied by the T-shaped IUD compared to the area covered by a pediatric-sized Foley catheter. A Foley catheter with the balloon inflated with at least 3mL of sterile water occupies more space and therefore can separate the endometrial walls much more effectively than a T-shaped device, potentially contributing to less IUA formation. Further research comparing these two alternatives in the prevention of IUA reformation are necessary.