Systemic Treatment Of Patients Research Articles

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis in a European real-world cohort.

Immunotherapy-based combinations are currently the standard of care in the systemic treatment of patients with HCC. Recent studies have reported unexpectedly long survival with lenvatinib (LEN), supporting its use in first-line treatment for HCC. This study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness of LEN to atezolizumab/bevacizumab (AZ/BV). A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of frontline AZ/BV or LEN therapy in patients with advanced HCC across 18 university hospitals in Europe. The study included 412 patients (AZ/BV: n=207; LEN: n=205). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. However, patients treated with AZ/BV had a significantly longer median progression-free survival compared to those receiving LEN. The risk of hepatic decompensation was significantly higher in patients with impaired baseline liver function (albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] grade 2) treated with AZ/BV compared to those with preserved liver function. Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease had poorer baseline liver function compared to other etiologies and exhibited a worse outcome under AZ/BV. In this real-world cohort, survival rates were similar between patients treated with LEN and those treated with AZ/BV, confirming that both are viable first-line options for HCC. The increased risk of hepatic decompensation in patients treated with AZ/BV who have impaired baseline liver function underscores the need for careful monitoring. Future trials should aim to distinguish more clearly between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease.

Systemic Therapy of Gastric Cancer—State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Background: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic gastric and esophago-gastric junction cancer is critical. The optimal choice of systemic therapy is essential to optimize survival outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review via PubMed and analysis of major oncology congresses (European Society for Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology websites) were conducted to ascertain the current status and latest developments in the systemic treatment of patients with localized or advanced gastric and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma. Results: While neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy for localized tumor stages is the preferred approach in the Western Hemisphere, adjuvant chemotherapy remains the preferred course of action in East Asia. The administration of chemotherapy, typically in the form of combinations comprising platinum and fluoropyrimidine compounds in combination with docetaxel, represents a standard of care. Investigations are underway into the potential of immunotherapy and other biologically targeted agents in the perioperative setting. To select the most appropriate therapy for advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, it is essential to determine biomarkers such as HER2 expression, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) (combined positive score), Claudin 18.2, and microsatellite instability (MSI). In the present clinical context, the standard first-line therapy is a combination of fluoropyrimidine and a platinum derivative. The selection of chemotherapy in combination with antibodies is contingent upon the specific biomarker under consideration. Conclusions: This article reviews the current state of the art based on recent clinical trial results and provides an outlook on the future of systemic therapy.

Liver metastasis and resistance to immunotherapy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. A literature review.

Microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains predominantly managed with chemotherapy. The use of immunotherapy, whether alone or in combination with other systemic or local treatments, displays limited success, especially in the context of active liver metastases (LM). The mechanisms responsible for this resistance are not fully understood. We conducted a comprehensive search across electronic databases such as Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. This search targeted translational studies evaluating the liver tumour immune microenvironment and immune tolerance mechanisms in CRC with LM and prospective studies that assessed immunotherapy either as a standalone treatment or in combination with other systemic or local therapies for patients diagnosed with MSS CRC. Our primary objectives included elucidating the mechanisms of resistance originating from LM in a non-systematic literature review and presenting a summary of the outcomes observed in prospective trials utilising immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with a focus on the presence of LM. There were 16 prospective trials evaluating immunotherapy for metastatic CRC comprising 1,713 patients. Response rates to immunotherapy inpatients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) varied from 0% to 23%. Overall, reduced or null responses to immunotherapy in the presence of liver metastasis in comparison to patients without liver involvement were observed. Studies consistently show the resistance derived from classical ICI, both alone and in combination with other systemic treatments in patients with CRLM. The design of upcoming trials using immunotherapy should consider LM as a stratification factor or contemplate excluding patients with liver involvement.

MRNA-1273 vaccination induces polyfunctional memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in patients with solid cancers undergoing immunotherapy or/and chemotherapy.

Research has confirmed the safety and comparable seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with solid cancers. However, the impact of cancer treatment on vaccine-induced T cell responses remains poorly understood. In this study, we expand on previous findings within the VOICE trial by evaluating the functional and phenotypic composition of mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses in patients with solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or both, compared to individuals without cancer. We conducted an ELISpot analysis on 386 participants to assess spike-specific T cell responses 28 days after full vaccination. Further in-depth characterization of using flow cytometry was performed on a subset of 63 participants to analyze the functional phenotype and differentiation state of spike-specific T cell responses. ELISpot analysis showed robust induction of spike-specific T cell responses across all treatment groups, with response rates ranging from 75% to 80%. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a distinctive cytokine production pattern across cohorts, with CD4 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2, and CD8 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and CCL4. Variations were observed in the proportion of monofunctional CD4 T cells producing TNF, particularly higher in individuals without cancer and patients treated with chemotherapy alone, while those treated with immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy predominantly produced IFNγ. Despite these differences, polyfunctional spike-specific memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were comparable across cohorts. Notably, immunotherapy-treated patients exhibited an expansion of spike-specific CD4 T cells with a terminally differentiated effector memory phenotype. These findings demonstrate that systemic treatment in patients with solid tumors does not compromise the quality of polyfunctional mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses. This underscores the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancers undergoing systemic treatment.

Systemic treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of metastatic NEN an interdisciplinary expert team should be involved in an individualized treatment strategy. SSA is the mainstay of antisecretory treatment in most functioning tumors. In antiproliferative intention SSA are first line treatment in receptor positive low proliferative NET. In intestinal metastatic disease PRRT is best established second line treatment. Further options are Everolimus (labeled) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (off-label). Everolimus is the only approved drug for antiproliferative treatment in patients with metastatic lung NET, whereas in pancreatic NET more therapeutic options are available (SSA, chemotherapy, PRRT, Sunitinib, Everolimus) without a standard of best sequence. In patients with metastatic NEC standard first line treatment (platinum + etoposide) has not changed for decades and new treatment options for this fatal disease are urgently needed. Benefit of immunotherapy is limited to a small subset of patients - new combinations are under investigation. This review summarizes the standard of care, criteria of treatment selection and new developments for systemic therapy in patients with metastatic NEN.

Machine learning prediction of the case-fatality of COVID-19 and risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the globe, patients with cancer have been found to have an increased risk of infection with COVID-19 and are highly likely to experience a severe disease course. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identified the risk factors for adverse outcomes. The study included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 2020 and April 2022 at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Republic of Korea, who have a history of NSCLC. The case-fatality rate and risk factors for COVID-19 were analyzed using a machine-learning prediction method. Additionally, the study investigated the effect of COVID-19 on the systemic treatment of patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Overall, 1,127 patients were included in this study, with 10.3% of the patients being older than 75 years; of these patients, 51.8% were ex- or current smokers. Among the 584 patients cured after surgery, 91 had stable disease after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, and 452 had recurrent or metastatic NSCLC. Among 452 patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC, 387 received systemic treatment in a palliative setting during COVID-19. Of these, 188 received targeted therapy, 111 received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 63 received immunotherapy +/- chemotherapy, and 26 received other agents. Among them, 94.6% of patients continued systemic treatment after the COVID-19 infection. Only one patient discontinued treatment because of complications of the COVID-19 infection, and 18 patients changed their systemic treatment because of disease progression. The case fatality rates were 0.86% for patients with early-stage NSCLC, 4.4% for patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and 9.96% for patients with advanced NSCLC. The factors associated with fatalities included palliative chemotherapy, type of palliative chemotherapy, age (≥75 years), diabetes, smoking history, history of lung radiotherapy, hypertension, sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The predictive model using logistic regression and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) performed well [area under the curve (AUC) for logistic regression =0.84 and AUC for XGB =0.84]. The case fatality rate in patients with NSCLC was 4.8%, while most patients with advanced NSCLC continued to receive systemic treatment. However, patients with risk factors require careful management of COVID-19 complications.

Evolving Precision First-Line Systemic Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

First-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly evolved over the past two decades. First, molecularly targeted therapy for a growing number of gain-of-function molecular targets has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with favorable toxicity profiles compared to platinum-containing chemotherapy and can be given as first-line systemic therapy in ~25% of patients with NSCLC. Actionable genetic alterations include EGFR, BRAF V600E, and MET exon 14 splicing site-sensitizing mutations, as well as ALK-, ROS1-, RET-, and NTRK-gene fusions. Secondly, inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or cemiplimab monotherapy have become a standard of care for ~25% of patients with NSCLC whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression (total proportion score (TPS) ≥50%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Lastly, for the remaining ~50% of patients who are fit and whose tumors have no or low PD-L1 expression (TPS of 0-49%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK aberrations, platinum-containing chemotherapy with the addition of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor alone or in combination of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor improves PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. The objectives of this review are to summarize the current data and perspectives on first-line systemic treatment in patients with unresectable NSCLC and propose a practical algorithm for implementing precision biomarker testing at diagnosis.

Systemic treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer — is there still a place for gemcitabine in the first-line setting? Experience of Polish oncology centers

Systemic treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer — is there still a place for gemcitabine in the first-line setting? Experience of Polish oncology centers

End of life treatment in gynecological cancers in an integrated care model: A single institution experience from Oman.

e24036 Background: The use of chemotherapy closer to the end of life (EOL) and the optimal time of initiating palliative care interventions are subjects of ongoing debate. In a traditional care model (TCM), the institution of EOL care is a complex decision-making process, that involves patient, family members, and the oncologist, and involves transfer of patients from one to the other service. Integrated care model (ICM) is a newer concept, is designed around the needs of the patients, and may have the potential to improve quality of life and reduce the cost of healthcare towards EOL. At our center, we work in ICM in organ-based clinical programs and report the use of systemic treatment in patients with gynecological cancers (GC) nearing EOL. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the use of chemotherapy and other systemic cancer-directed therapies in patients with GC, who died between Sept 2021 and December 2023 at a single institution. Information on the cancer-type, intention of treatment, and the time between last treatment and death was obtained from electronic patient records (EPR). Results: Over the study period, a total of 22 patients passed away. All patients received palliative care as part of the integrated care. All patients had been declared ‘not for resuscitation’ before death. Twelve patients had ovarian cancer, 5 had endometrial cancer, 4 had cancer of cervix, and one had vulvar cancer. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (29-80). The systemic treatment was 1st line in 5 patients (23%), 2nd line in 8 patients (36%), and 3rd or more line in 6 patients (27%) respectively. Three patients (14%) did not receive any cancer-directed treatment (aged 80, 71 and 61). The ultimate line of treatment was cytotoxic chemotherapy for all patients, except for one who received Olaparib, and one who received trastuzumab with chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. The median time from last treatment to death was 55 days. Of the 19 patients who received treatment, 6 patients (32%) received treatment in the last 30 days, 5 between 30 and 60 days (26%), 5 between 60 and 90 days (26%), and 3 more than 90 days before death. Four patients died at home. Age at diagnosis (51 vs 55 years), age at death (51.5 vs 57.5 years), or time from diagnosis to death (11.5 vs 22 months), did not predict whether patients received treatment within the 30 days of death or earlier. Conclusions: All patients received palliative care as part of integrated cancer care. The ICM may have led to lower use of cancer treatment near EOL. The data may provide a benchmark for the region.

Efficacy of systemic treatments in patients with metastatic lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

e20609 Background: Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a relatively rare histological subtype of lung adenocarcinomas that differs in its clinical behavior, radiologic features, histopathological, and genomic characteristics than invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinomas (INMA). Methods: We retrospectively investigated medical records of patients diagnosed with lung IMA at four oncology centers in Turkey. Patients who were ≥18 years of age, pathologically diagnosed with lung IMA, and who received at least one course of treatment for metastatic or inoperable disease were included in the study. Results: Forty-one patients were included in the study. The median follow-up was 16.6 months. Among the included patients, 24 (58.5%) were male, 17 (38.5%) were female, and their average age was 62. Six (14.6%) patients had a targetable mutation. Three (7.3%) patients were epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), two (4.8%) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, and one (2.4%) neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK2) fusion. Most patients (83.1%) had received platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Of the patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 9 (25.7%) had a partial response, 14 (40%) had a stable response, and 12 (34.3%) had progression. The median PFS was 8.24 months (95% CI: 5.9-10.5 months), and the median OS was 20.4 months (95% CI: 14.4-26.3 months) in all study populations. In those receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, median PFS and OS were 8.11 months (95% CI: 5.02-11.2) and 17.5 months (95% CI: 11.7-23.3 months), respectively. While the PFS of two EGFR-positive patients were similar at 18.9 months and 20.6 months, the third patient's PFS was quite prolonged (66.5 months). The ALK-positive patients receiving brigatinib and crizotinib PFS were 15.8 months and 2.73 months, respectively. The PFS of the patient receiving entrectinib was only two months. Among the entire patient population, only one patient used oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination (XELOX) as chemotherapy. In this patient, who progressed after four cycles of gemcitabine and platinum first-line treatment, a partial response and 7.23 months PFS were achieved with second line XELOX. Conclusions: Standard-of-care treatments have the same efficacy in IMA and INMA patients. Targetable mutation is less common in IMA patients compared to INMA. 5-FU-based chemotherapies also appear to be effective in lung IMA patients.

Efficacy of Systemic Treatments in Patients With Metastatic Lung Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a rare histological subtype of lung invasive adenocarcinoma with unique clinical, radiological, histopathological, and genomic characteristics. There have been limited studies on the effectiveness of systemic therapy for lung IMA, with conflicting results reported. MethodsWe retrospectively investigated the medical records of patients diagnosed with lung IMA. Patients who were ≥ 18 years of age and received at least 1 course of treatment for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease were included in the study. Archive records of 113 patients diagnosed with IMA were screened for the study. ResultsA total of 41 patients with lung IMA were included. The targetable mutation rate was 20.6% (in 6 of 29 patients). Most patients (83.1%) had received platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 25.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.02-11.2) and 17.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-23.3 months), respectively, in the patients who received chemotherapy. The median PFS and ORR were 20.6 (95% CI, 18.9-66.5) and 66.6%, respectively, in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients (n = 3) with relevant targeted therapy. Only 1 patient used oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination (XELOX) as chemotherapy in the second-line treatment and achieved a partial response (PR) at 7.2 months. ConclusionPlatinum-based chemotherapies moderately enhance IMA patients’ survival rates. Anti-EGFR-targeted drugs are seen as potentially effective in patients with EGFR driver mutation positive. Large, prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Abstract PO5-04-14: Quality of Life (QoL) among metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer patients during first line systemic treatment

Abstract Background Current international guidelines recommend endocrine therapy combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor as the preferred first line systemic treatment in patients diagnosed with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR), HER2 negative breast cancer (BC). Randomized controlled trials that led to the approval of these agents in the first line disease setting are derived from controlled environments and selected patients. We aimed to assess real-world patients’ characteristics, safety and health related quality of life in a non-select cohort of patients being managed in a Brazilian private Cancer Center. Methods: We performed a cross sectional study at Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo evaluating quality of life among patients with metastatic HR+/HER2 negative treated in the first line disease setting. Inclusion criteria included patients that received the combination of a CDK4/6i with any endocrine therapy (ET) between January 2018 and April 2023. Primary endpoint was quality of life assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ-BR23, it is baseline, there is only one measurement for each patient. Results: We analyzed 72 patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 49 years old (ranging from 31 to 91). Approximately half of the population was premenopausal (51%). Palbociclib and abemaciclib were the most commonly used CDK4/6i, with 42 and 35% of patients, respectively. ECOG performance status was zero or one in almost the entire patient population analyzed (97%). 53% of the patients were diagnosed as de novo metastatic BC. Table 1 and 2 summarize the patients characteristics. Mean global health status was 75.4, with social and cognitive functioning scoring the highest (Mean 78.6 and 79.1, respectively). The most distressing symptom among the symptom scale was fatigue (Mean 27.2). Most symptoms and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between the different CDK4/6 inhibitors. Conclusion: Real-world data from our study is consistent with the historical expected health related quality of life among patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2 negative metastatic BC in the first line disease setting. Table. Citation Format: Débora Gagliato, Julio Antonio Araujo, Bianca Milena Verboski, Guilherme William Marcelino, Fabiana Nogueira Momberg, Gilmara Silveira da Silva, Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli, Antônio Buzaid. Quality of Life (QoL) among metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer patients during first line systemic treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-04-14.

Abstract PO3-20-11: Among the < 0.1 percent of breast cancers: A case of adenoid cystic carcinoma

Abstract Among the < 0.1 percent of breast cancers: A case of adenoid cystic carcinoma Sera Choi, B.A., Sarah Keshwani, M.D., Andrea Madrigrano, M.D. Introduction: Adenoid cystic carcinoma in the breast (ACCB) is a rare subtype of breast cancer that accounts for < 0.1% of all breast-related malignancies. The majority of ACCB cases in existing literature are comprised of estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, abbreviated as triple-negative breast cancer. Although most triple negative breast cancers are aggressive in nature and prognosis, ACCB is reported to be more indolent with a favorable outcome. This disparity raises the question of whether the treatment approach for ACCB should follow the well-established treatment plan for other triple negative breast cancers given its atypical characteristics. Furthermore, while adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands is a well-known type of head and neck cancer with established treatment guidelines, there is limited data for recommendations regarding treatment for ACCB. We report a pathologically confirmed case of ACCB and review the existing literature regarding treatment strategy and prognosis. Case: This case is of a 69-year-old female who presented with an abnormal screening mammogram with a core needle biopsy confirming ACCB in the left lower outer quadrant. The patient was asymptomatic with no palpable masses, nipple discharge, or skin changes of the breast. Biopsy revealed adenoid cystic carcinoma grade 2, classic type, with immunochemistry confirming estrogen-receptor negative, progesterone-receptor negative, and human epidermal growth factor-receptor negative. After a thorough discussion of the options, the patient elected for breast conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Tumor was resected with negative margins and two out of two lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. The patient was recommended whole breast adjuvant radiation therapy given the large tumor size of 4.8cm. Chemotherapy was not recommended due to data that largely supports local targeted therapy over systemic treatment in patients without metastatic ACCB. The patient is continuing with routine follow-up evaluations. Discussion: Currently, mainstay treatment comprises of surgical resection with lumpectomy or mastectomy, with or without nodal evaluation. Radiation therapy is seen as beneficial in reducing recurrence and prolonging disease-free survival in ACCB. There is ongoing debate regarding the role of chemotherapy in ACCB patients, as triple-negative breast cancers are typically treated with a systemic chemotherapy regimen. However, since ACCB has a more favorable prognosis, the role of chemotherapy remains uncertain. With lack of data on ACCB, treatment modalities should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, considering the scarcity of information concerning this particular subtype of breast cancer, it is advisable to discuss these patients within a multi-disciplinary tumor board setting to ensure patients receive the maximum benefit. Citation Format: Sera Choi, Sarah Keshwani, Andrea Madrigrano. Among the < 0.1 percent of breast cancers: A case of adenoid cystic carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-20-11.

Metastasis-Directed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy and Undergoing Oligoprogression: Report on 11 Consecutive Cases

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeted at metastatic sites of disease progression is emerging as a potential therapeutic approach for managing oligoprogressive prostate cancer. However, a definitive benefit has yet to be demonstrated. Herein, we present our institution’s experience with this treatment approach. Methods: From April 2018 to March 2023, 11 patients affected by oligoprogressive prostate cancer were treated with SBRT targeting the nodal or bone sites of progression while maintaining the ongoing systemic therapy. Three patients were undergoing single-agent ADT (Androgen Deprivation Therapy), while the remaining eight were receiving a subsequent line of systemic therapy. All patients were evaluated with a pre-treatment 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, which demonstrated between one and five localizations of disease. All the active sites were treated with SBRT in one (15–24 Gy) or three (21–27 Gy) fractions, except for one patient, who was treated in five fractions (35 Gy). PSA serum levels were tested at baseline, one month after RT and at least every three months; all patients underwent a post-treatment 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT. The evaluated endpoints were PSA response, defined as a post-treatment decrease >50% from baseline measured within 6 months, time to next-line systemic treatment (NEST), local control (LC), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) and freedom from polymetastatic progression (FPP). Results: Nineteen lesions were treated (seven nodal and twelve bone). At a median follow-up of 19 months (7–63), 9 of the 11 patients had a PSA response; all patients had local control of the treated metastases. A total of six patients switched to a next-line systemic treatment, with a median NEST of 13 months. Six patients had polymetastatic progression with an FPP median time of 19 months. No patients died during the follow-up period. The SBRT-related toxicity was negligible. Conclusions: Our data support the use of SBRT targeting the sites of oligoprogressive disease before moving to a subsequent line of systemic treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies to evaluate the potential impact of this approach on overall survival are warranted.

Abstract LB104: Tumor fraction as a predictive factor of outcome in patients referred for oncology early phase clinical trials: Analyses of two precision medicine studies

Abstract Modern phase I trials have shown considerable advancement, demonstrating encouraging response rates and subsequently raising the demand for participant enrollment. Despite these advances, there remains a significant challenge: approximately 15% of patients enrolled in these trials pass away within the first 90 days, and nearly half of them do not experience any therapeutic benefit. These statistics underscore the critical need for more effective strategies in selecting suitable patients for trial participation. One promising avenue is the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements to estimate tumor fraction (TF), a method that has shown potential in prognosticating outcomes for patients with solid tumors. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of TF as an indicator for predicting the clinical benefits of systemic treatments in patients referred for early phase studies is yet to be conclusively determined Methods: We analyzed adult patients with advanced solid tumors included from December 2020 to December 2021 in two precision medicine studies: BIP (NCT02534649) and STING (NCT04932525). Comprehensive genomic profiling was conducted using the FDA approved 324-gene FoundationOne Liquid Cdx assay. TF was categorized as ≥10% or <10%. Multivariate analysis incorporated established prognostic scores (Royal Marsden Hospital: RMH, Garrido-Laguna et al. 2012; and GRIm, Bigot et al., 2017) and their individual components (RMH: albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, number of metastatic sites; GRIm: neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin). Results: A total of 1305 patients referred for early phase trials were evaluated: 871 in BIP and 434 in STING.The treatment regimens patients received post-TF assessment included: cytotoxic agents (BIP: 278 patients, 28.8%; STING: 106 patients, 24.4%), immunotherapy (BIP: 152 patients, 15.8%; STING: 76 patients, 17.5%), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BIP: 126 patients, 13.1%; STING: 35 patients, 8.1%), hormonal therapy (BIP: 131 patients, 13.6%; STING: 9 patients, 2.1%), and various other therapies or combinations. High TF was significantly correlated with poorer objective response/stable disease rate, shorter progression-free survival (PFS), and lower overall survival (OS) in both studies. Multivariate analysis confirmed TF as an independent predictor of objective response, PFS, and OS, beyond the RMH and GRIm scores and their components. Conclusions: This is the first prospective analysis confirming that TF is a significant predictive marker of treatment efficacy in patients referred for early phase studies. Our findings suggest that TF could be a valuable tool in decision-making for phase I trial participation. Additionally, this research lays the groundwork for future exploration of TF in risk stratification of cancer patients in various clinical contexts. Citation Format: Laila Belcaid, Sophie Cousin, Arnaud Bayle, Melissa Alame, Etienne Rouleau, Laura Blouin, Ludovic Lacroix, Damien Vasseur, Maxime Brunet, Sofiane Taleb, Isabelle Soubeyran, Veronique Debien, Eurydice Angeli, Christophe Massard, Antoine Italiano. Tumor fraction as a predictive factor of outcome in patients referred for oncology early phase clinical trials: Analyses of two precision medicine studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB104.

Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound analysis in predicting early response to systemic therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) analysis in early prediction of tumor response to systemic treatment in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Patients & MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with ICC by core needle biopsy and histopathological results were included. All patients were diagnosed as advanced stages (stage III/IV) by the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM staging system. Liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination, DCE-US analysis, CT/MRI, and blood tests were performed in all patients before and 2 months after systemic treatment. CEUS procedure was performed using an ultrasound system (ACUSON Sequoia; Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) equipped with a 5C1 MHz convex array transducer. Time-intensity curves (TIC) and quantitative parameters were created with VueBox software. According to one-year results of the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST) based on CT/MRI, patients were divided into the responder group (RG) and the non-responder group (NRG). Before and 2 months after systemic therapy, the DCE-US perfusion parameters was compared using the paired-sample t test and the Wilcoxon test. ResultsFrom September 2020 to December 2021, a total of 24 patients diagnosed with advanced ICC were included (11 males, 13 females, mean age 59.4 ± 1.8 years). According to the one year of m-RECIST results, 17 cases (70.8 %) were classified as non-responders by the final m-RECIST criteria, while 7 cases (19.2 %) were responders. Comparing before and 2 months after therapy, the RG took longer time to reach peak intensity, and the peak intensity of TIC was lower. While the TICs of NRG revealed faster enhancement after therapy. Among all DCE-US quantitative parameters, PE (peak enhancement), WiR (wash-in rate), WiPI (wash-in perfusion index) and WoR (wash-out rate) reduced significantly following 2 months of systemic therapy in RG (P < 0.05). Comparing to RG, PE and WiPI decreased slightly 2 months after therapy in NRG (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe DCE-US analysis with quantitative parameters has the potential value to make early and quantitative evaluation of treatment response to systemic therapy in ICC patients.

Comparison of outcomes between preoperative and postoperative systemic treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER database-based study.

Significant advancements in systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma have been made in recent years. However, the optimal timing of systemic treatment before or after surgery remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the impact of sequencing systemic treatment and surgical intervention on the long-term prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. In our study, we analyzed data from patients diagnosed with primary liver cancer (2004-2015) extracted from the SEER database. Patients who underwent both systemic treatment and surgical intervention were selected, divided into preoperative and postoperative systemic therapy groups. The primary endpoint of the study is overall survival(OS), and the secondary endpoint is cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) reduced the influence of confounding factors, while Kaplan-Meier curves and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model accounted for variables during survival analysis. A total of 1918 eligible HCC patients were included, with 1406 cases in the preoperative systemic treatment group and 512 cases in the postoperative systemic treatment group. Survival analysis showed that both the preoperative group demonstrated longer median overall survival (OS) and median cancer-specific survival (CSS) before and after PSM. After conducting multivariate COX regression analysis with stepwise adjustment of input variables, the postoperative systemic treatment group continued to exhibit a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.55-2.1) and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.73-2.54). Subgroup analysis indicated consistent results for overall survival (OS) across different subgroups. Hepatocellular carcinoma patients from the SEER database who received preoperative systemic therapy had superior OS and CSS compared to those who received postoperative systemic therapy.

EGFR and ERBB2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Chinese Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Pathological and Molecular Characterization, and First-Line Systemic Treatment Evaluation.

Data from studies looking at both EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations (-20ins) in the same cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in all-stage NSCLC patients to reveal their histological and molecular features, and to retrospectively evaluate the results of first-line real-world systemic treatments in patients with advanced-stage disease. We collected 13,920 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC specimens. Clinicopathological features were recorded and DNA-based next-generation sequencing was performed. First-line systemic treatment data were obtained via chart review. In total, 414 (2.97%) EGFR-20ins cases and 666 (4.78%) ERBB2-20ins cases were identified. Both were more common in women, non-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma. The incidence of EGFR/ERBB2-20ins in adenocarcinoma is inversely proportional to the degree of invasion; 77 and 26 variants were detected in EGFR-20ins and ERBB2-20ins cases, respectively. The most common concurrently mutated genes were TP53 and RB1. In invasive adenocarcinoma, lepidic components were more common in EGFR/ERBB2-20ins-alone cases than in those with other concurrent mutated genes. In EGFR-/ERBB2-20ins patients, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or treatment response to first-line systemic treatments in this study. There was no significant difference in PFS or treatment response among patients with different EGFR/ERBB2-20ins variants and those with or without concurrent mutated genes. EGFR/ERBB2-20ins is more common in early lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR-20ins had more variants. In both cohorts, the results for first-line systemic treatments showed no significant difference.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Absorption Model for Pexidartinib to Evaluate the Impact of Meal Contents and Intake Timing on Drug Exposure.

Pexidartinib is a systemic treatment for patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor not amenable to surgery. Oral absorption of pexidartinib is affected by food; administration with a high-fat meal (HFM) or low-fat meal (LFM) increases absorption by approximately 100% and approximately 60%, respectively, compared with the fasted state. Pexidartinib is currently dosed 250mg orally twice daily with an LFM (approximately 11-14 g of total fat). We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to determine the impact on drug exposure of dose timing with respect to meals, meal type, and caloric content. A 15%-16% increase in plasma exposure was predicted when consuming an HFM 1hour after dosing with an LFM, but almost no effect on pharmacokinetics was predicted when an HFM was consumed 3 hours or more before or after pexidartinib dosing with an LFM. Exposure was not significantly affected when pexidartinib was taken with a 500-kcal LFM over the range of fat (approximately 11-14 g of total fat; 20%-25% calories from fat) for an LFM. These findings on timing of pexidartinib dose with respect to meals should be considered by patients and physicians to reduce the potential for side effects.

The GALAD score and the BALAD-2 score correlate with transarterial and systemic treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PurposeThe GALAD score and the BALAD-2 score are biomarker-based scoring systems used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both incorporate levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP). Our objective was to examine the relationship between the GALAD score as well as the BALAD-2 score and treatment response to transarterial or systemic treatments in patients with HCC.MethodsA total of 220 patients with HCC treated with either transarterial (n = 121) or systemic treatments (n = 99; mainly Sorafenib) were retrospectively analyzed. The GALAD score and the BALAD-2 score were calculated based on AFP-L3, AFP, and DCP levels measured in serum samples collected before treatment. The results were correlated with 3-month treatment efficacy based on radiologic mRECIST criteria.ResultsThe GALAD score showed a strong correlation with BCLC stage (p < 0.001) and total tumor diameter before treatment (p < 0.001).The GALAD score at baseline was significantly lower in patients with a 3-month response to transarterial (p > 0.001) than in refractory patients. Among patients receiving systemic treatment, the median BALAD-2 score at baseline showed a strong association with response at month 3 (p < 0.001).In the transarterial treatment group, the GALAD score (AUC = 0.715; p < 0.001) as well as the BALAD score (AUC = 0.696; p < 0.001) were associated with overall survival, hereby outperforming AFP, AFP-L3 and DCP.ConclusionThe GALAD score as well as the BALAD-2 score hold significant promise as a prognostic tool for patients with early or intermediate-stage HCC who are undergoing transarterial or systemic treatments.