Systemic Symptoms Syndrome Research Articles

A Rare Case of Vancomycin-Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome

A Rare Case of Vancomycin-Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe cutaneous adverse drug eruption characterized by rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, hematologic abnormalities, and organ dysfunction. Identifying causative agents and monitoring disease course in DRESS syndrome is crucial to prevent end-organ damage. The temporal relationship between causative medications including vancomycin and laboratory abnormalities in DRESS has not been studied, limiting the utility of laboratory data in monitoring disease course. Our study aims to investigate associations between medication class and peak serum laboratory values using simple linear regression (absolute eosinophils, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]). We found a significant difference between timing of peak AST values among vancomycin-triggered DRESS compared to other trigger groups. These findings draw attention to the increased role of AST as a diagnostic and monitoring tool in DRESS.

Phenytoin-induced DRESS syndrome: A multidisciplinary case study in precision medicine and advanced therapeutics

This case report aims to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for phenytoin-induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in a pediatric patient, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and intervention. A 17-year-old male presented with a pruritic rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and elevated liver enzymes one month after starting phenytoin for epilepsy. Diagnosis was confirmed using the RegiSCAR scoring system, which objectively assessed clinical and laboratory findings. The patient received high-dose corticosteroids and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) after discontinuing phenytoin, with regular monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters. Timely withdrawal of phenytoin, along with corticosteroid and NAC therapy, led to the resolution of symptoms without long-term complications. The RegiSCAR scoring system proved invaluable for accurate and swift diagnosis, supporting its utility in pediatric DRESS cases. This case also suggests the potential of genetic screening, particularly HLA typing, for identifying high-risk individuals, although it was not utilized here. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management are critical for favorable outcomes in pediatric DRESS cases. Routine HLA screening could help prevent DRESS syndrome in patients prescribed high-risk medications, though further studies are needed to assess feasibility and cost-effectiveness. This case underlines the value of standardized treatment protocols and personalized medicine in managing drug hypersensitivity reactions effectively.

DRESS syndrome and tuberculosis: Implementation of a desensitization and re-desensitization protocol to recover antituberculosis drugs in a case series at a specialized TB Unit in Lima, Peru.

Antituberculosis drugs (ATDs) could cause severe and rare reactions, such as Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Recovering ATDs might guarantee a higher cure rate for tuberculosis patients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of desensitization and re-desensitization to recover ATDs in a case series of patients with DRESS syndrome. A retrospective case series study was conducted on patients with DRESS syndrome due to therapy with ATDs from 2021 to 2023. Desensitization and re-desensitization protocols, designed with an algorithm proposed by the Tuberculosis Specialized Unit of the Dos de Mayo National Hospital in Lima, Peru, were implemented. A total of 18 patients underwent desensitization or re-desensitization protocols, achieving an overall success rate of 72.2%. The average time for the development of DRESS syndrome due to ATDs was 19 days. Rifampicin (84.2%), isoniazid (68.4%), and pyrazinamide (26.3%) were identified as the main drugs responsible for this adverse reaction. All patients presented with fever and skin rash, with an average eosinophil percentage of 16.7% (interquartile range: 4.5-28.8). Organ involvement (liver, kidney, and heart) was observed in 8 patients, but only 2 patients experienced severe complications due to DRESS syndrome. A significant association was found between the number of ATDs used and eosinophil levels (P =.03). The study introduced a desensitization and re-desensitization algorithm for the treatment of DRESS syndrome, notable for its safety, adaptability, and high success rate. This advancement provided healthcare professionals with safer and more effective therapeutic approaches for managing this complex condition.

Purpura at electrocardiography probe sites: Electrocardiography sign in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome

Purpura at electrocardiography probe sites: Electrocardiography sign in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome with Multiple Drugs (Leflunomide and Cefuroxime): A Case Report

Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are unexpected reactions to a medicine administered in the correct manner and at the proper dosage. Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms syndrome (DRESS syndrome) is a Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (SCAR) type of ADR with complicated clinical features involving several organ systems of the body; frequently involved organs are the liver, kidney, lungs, and other organs. Prompt recognition and correct diagnosis, followed by withdrawal of the causative agent, can promote appropriate treatment, accelerate recovery, and reduce the related morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: We have, herein, presented a case of a 42-year-old female with a history of leflunomide intake for plantar fasciitis. The patient subsequently developed fever, gastrointestinal tract disturbance, facial edema, liver injury, skin rash, hematologic abnormalities (eosinophilia), hepatosplenomegaly, and lymph node enlargement. The probability of leflunomide-induced DRESS syndrome was rated as “definite”, with seven scores graded by RegiSCAR. The suspected causative agent was withdrawn, and the patient was managed symptomatically. Following her management and discharge, she again encountered similar complaints after administration of the cefuroxime tablet. The causality assessment of the reactions was done using the WHO-UMC scale and Naranjo’s assessment scale, and a “probable” reaction was found for both drugs. Conclusion: The presented case contributes to the existing global literature regarding exceptional clinical presentations. Leflunomide and cefuroxime drugs have the potential to cause DRESS syndrome. Thus, they should be handled cautiously, and if such a reaction occurs, it should be reported to the responsible authorities.

Prophylaxis after contrast media-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome: our personal experience.

Prophylaxis after contrast media-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome: our personal experience.

Suture-Less and Glue-Less Amniotic Membrane Graft for Keratopathy and Early Keratinization in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome

Purpose: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome can cause significant keratopathy and lead to lasting visual effects. The main objective of this study was to describe an ocular presentation of DRESS treated with a modified suture-less and glue-less amniotic membrane graft technique. This study also provides a literature review of ocular DRESS manifestations and ocular management of the other severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Methods: This is a case review about an 82-year-old man with sepsis due to recent Mycobacterium tuberculosis, who presented with DRESS based on clinical findings. Results: The patient was treated with a modified suture-less and glue-less amniotic membrane graft technique along with a Prokera corneal bandage placement. The patient had significant improvement of visual acuity and symptoms with this technique. Conclusions: Patients with significant corneal and conjunctival involvement associated with DRESS, similar to Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), may benefit from more aggressive treatment with amniotic membrane transplantation and Prokera corneal bandage placement to prevent scarring and subsequent vision loss. The modified technique described in this article can be used for patients who may be poor candidates for the operating room.

50925 Morbidity and mortality of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in hospitalized patients

50925 Morbidity and mortality of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in hospitalized patients

Lamotrigine: A Safe and Effective Mood Stabilizer for Bipolar Disorder in Reproductive-Age Adults.

Lamotrigine belongs to the group of antiepileptic drugs and mood stabilizers, and its action is based on the selective blocking of voltage-deficient sodium channels. The effect of this mechanism is the stabilization of the presynaptic part of the neuronal membrane and subsequent inhibition of the secretion of the neurotransmitters glutamate and aspartate into the postsynaptic part of the neuron. Lamotrigine has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the maintenance treatment of adults with bipolar disorder since 1994. In the field of psychiatry, this medicine is also used off-label in the treatment of acute bipolar depression. Studies show promising effects of the use of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder type II with rapid phase change. Bipolar disorder is a common psychiatric problem that most often affects young adults. Lamotrigine is most effective in bipolar disorder in preventing depressive episodes, which dominate the clinical picture of this disease. The latest research focuses on extending its action, to include manic episodes. Lamotrigine, through an unexplained mechanism, can affect the immune system, causing Stevens-Johnson syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome. These are rare, life-threatening adverse effects that require urgent intervention in the form of drug discontinuation and immunosuppressive treatment. Strict contraindications to the use of lamotrigine include sensitivity reactions accompanied by systemic symptoms. Phenotype testing enables screening of patients predisposed to serious hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of the article is to review the indications, contraindications, and adverse effects of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder and depression.

Histopathologic Features of Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction occurring 2 to 8 weeks after medication initiation. Diagnosis is clinical; RegiSCAR scoring includes biopsy "suggestive of DRESS," undefined in the literature. This study correlates DRESS dermatopathology, culprit drugs, disease course, and outcome severity compared with maculopapular drug reactions (MDR). Between 2014 and 2023, a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care institute reviewed 55 patients with DRESS, assessing demographics, culprit drug, illness course, and histopathology. Biopsies of 15 patients with DRESS and 15 MDR patients were graded by a predefined histopathological scoring system. Statistical analysis (significant P -value<0.05) included the Fisher exact probability, ANOVA, and correlation tests. Among 55 patients with DRESS (mean age 50.13, 28 female/27 male), 15 (mean age 50.4, 7 female/8 male) had diagnostic biopsies. Compared with MDR patients, patients with DRESS exhibited significantly more interface dermatitis ( P = 0.04), lichenoid dermatitis ( P = 0.0007), pigment incontinence ( P = 0.04), and periadnexal interface dermatitis ( P = 0.002). MDR biopsies displayed perivascular inflammation and higher eosinophils than DRESS, trending toward significance. Key histopathologic features are interface dermatitis, periadnexal interface dermatitis, lichenoid dermatitis, pigment incontinence, and neutrophils dominance over eosinophils indicate DRESS clinically.

First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting

BackgroundIn high HIV prevalence settings, first line anti-tuberculosis drug (FLTD)-associated DRESS poses therapeutic challenges. Sequential and additive drug challenge (SADC) of FLTDs best identifies offending drug(s), avoids unnecessary exclusions, and optimises re-initiation of non-offending drugs. However, SADC-associated reaction complexities limit its utility. ObjectiveWe aimed to describe characteristics of FLTD-associated DRESS patients, their treatment-limiting SADC reactions and related outcomes. MethodsPatients hospitalized with FLTD-associated DRESS from 2013–2023 in a South African tertiary hospital and enrolled (retrospectively or prospectively) in an existing registry were eligible. ResultsSADC was undertaken in 41 patients. Overall, 47 classifiable reactions occurred, 34/47(72%) in 29/41(71%) patients, were treatment-limiting and 12/41(29%) reinitiated FLTDs uneventfully. Fifteen single and eight multiple drug-reactors were identified. Rifampicin, in 13/23(57%) reactors was the commonest individual offender. Ethambutol was most frequently involved in multiple drug-reactors. Median(IQR) time to a detectable reaction was 24(12-120) hours, 6/34(18%) being immediate (<6hours). Itch (65%), eosinophilia (56%), fever (41%), atypical lymphocytosis (41%), rash (38%), transaminitis (32%) and facial oedema (18%), singly or in combination were commonest features. Three reactions, one epidermal necrolysis and two liver derangements, were CTCAE grade 4 (life-threatening) events. No predictors of multiple drug-reactivity were identified, but multiple reactors were hospitalised significantly longer, 125(100-134) versus 60(45-80) days. ConclusionsSADC optimises FLTD reinitiation. However, timing, clinical presentation and severity of SADC-associated reactions following FLTD-associated DRESS is markedly heterogenous. Additionally, multiple drug-reactors are a complex group requiring longer hospitalisation, and without routine biomarkers to differentiate true multiple drug hypersensitivity from non-specific flare-ups and guide long-term drug avoidance strategies.

Antipsychotic-Related DRESS Syndrome: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is gaining attention in pharmacovigilance, but its association with antipsychotics, other than clozapine, is still unclear. We conducted a case/non-case study with disproportionality analysis based on the World Health Organization (WHO) global spontaneous reporting database, VigiBase®. We analyzed individual case safety reports of DRESS syndrome related to antipsychotics compared to (1) all other medications in VigiBase®, (2) carbamazepine (a known positive control), and (3) within classes (typical/atypical) of antipsychotics. We calculated reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian information component (IC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Disproportionate reporting was prioritized based on clinical importance, according to predefined criteria. Additionally, we compared characteristics of patients reporting with serious/non-serious reactions. A total of 1534 reports describing DRESS syndrome for 19 antipsychotics were identified. The ROR for antipsychotics as a class as compared to all other medications was 1.0 (95% CI 0.9-1.1). We found disproportionate reporting for clozapine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3), cyamemazine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 0.5-1.7), and chlorpromazine (ROR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; IC 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-1.0). We found 35.7% of cases with co-reported anticonvulsants, and 25% with multiple concurrent antipsychotics in serious compared to 8.6% in non-serious cases (p = 0.03). Fatal cases were 164 (10.7%). Apart from the expected association with clozapine, chlorpromazine and cyamemazine (sharing an aromatic heteropolycyclic molecular structure) emerged with a higher-than-expected reporting of DRESS. Better knowledge of the antipsychotic-related DRESS syndrome should increase clinicians' awareness leading to safer prescribing of antipsychotics.

Advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not affect ability to utilize lymphadenopathy in assessment of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in HIV and tuberculosis: Prospective comparative study

RegiSCAR validation criteria for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) includes lymphadenopathy, a frequent feature of both tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). TB is the most common HIV-associated coinfection. Advanced HIV is associated with lymph node (LN) fibrosis. It is not clear if this negatively affects case validation in HIV-associated DRESS. To answer this question, we designed a prospective descriptive study to assess lymphadenopathy in various combinations of comorbid HIV, TB, and DRESS. We sought to describe the prevalence of DRESS-associated lymphadenopathy and characterize LN quality, size, and distribution in a high HIV-TB burden setting over time. We prospectively and systematically examined LN in 25 consecutive acute DRESS cases hospitalized at a South African tertiary-care center and 10 hospitalized non-DRESS HIV-TB coinfected controls. Fourteen (56%) of 25 patients were HIV infected, with a median (interquartile range) CD4 count of 254 (66-478) cells/mm³, and 7 of 14 were coinfected with TB. Using RegiSCAR criteria, 12 (46%) of 25 were definite DRESS cases, 8(31%) of 25 probable, and 5 (23%) of 25 possible. Possible cases were excluded in the analysis. Fifteen (75%) of 20 subjects had LN in ≥2 anatomic sites, including all 7 patients with HIV-TB coinfection. In contrast, 1 (20%) of 5 hospitalized non-DRESS HIV-TB coinfected controls had LN. Cervical LN, in 15 (88%) of 17, was most common, followed by axillary (76%) and inguinal (59%). Cervical LN ranged between 1 and 2 cm in size. Among the 8 (32%) of 25 subjects with follow-up data, LN had regressed in all within 6 weeks of stopping the offending drug and initiating TB treatment. There was no correlation with CD4 cell count and LN. Lymphadenopathy is a common feature of acute DRESS, even among HIV-TB-coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression.

ALDRESS: A Retrospective Pilot Study to Develop a Pharmacological Causality Algorithm for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS).

Background: The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome represents a severe form of drug hypersensitivity reaction characterized by significant morbidity, mortality, and long-term sequelae, coupled with limited therapeutic avenues. Accurate identification of the causative drug(s) is paramount for acute management, exploration of safe therapeutic alternatives, and prevention of future occurrences. However, the absence of a standardized diagnostic test and a specific causality algorithm tailored to DRESS poses a significant challenge in its clinical management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study involving 37 DRESS patients to validate a novel causality algorithm, the ALDRESS, designed explicitly for this syndrome, comparing it against the current standard algorithm, SEFV. Results: The ALDRESS algorithm showcased superior performance, exhibiting an 85.7% sensitivity and 93% specificity with comparable negative predictive values (80.6% vs. 97%). Notably, the ALDRESS algorithm yielded a substantially higher positive predictive value (75%) compared to SEFV (51.40%), achieving an overall accuracy rate of 92%. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the efficacy of the ALDRESS algorithm in accurately attributing causality to drugs implicated in DRESS syndrome. However, further validation studies involving larger, diverse cohorts are warranted to consolidate its clinical utility and broaden its applicability. This study lays the groundwork for a refined causality assessment tool, promising advancements in the diagnosis and management of DRESS syndrome.

Heparin-induced DRESS syndrome in a paediatric patient and successful anaesthetic management in cardiovascular bypass surgery: case report

BackgroundDrug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome is a severe adverse drug reaction marked by delayed hypersensitivity reactions causing skin and systemic complications. DRESS diagnosis is challenging due to the variety of clinical presentations and symptom overlap with other conditions. The perioperative period in these patients requires precise pharmacological strategies to prevent complications associated with this syndrome. The treatment of DRESS induced by unfractionated heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery presents some challenges that must be considered when selecting an anticoagulant to avoid side effects. In this case, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing CPB. However, in contrast to heparin/protamine, there is no direct reversal agent for bivalirudin.Case presentationWe report the case of an 11-year-old male diagnosed with native aortic valve endocarditis and thrombosis in his left lower extremity. During valvular replacement surgery, systemic unfractionated heparin was administered. Postoperatively, the patient developed fever, eosinophilia and pruritic rash. Warm shock and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels followed, leading to the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome. Treatment with methylprednisolone resulted in complete resolution of symptoms. Seven years later, the patient was readmitted due to insufficient anticoagulation and a thrombus in the prosthetic aortic valve, presenting a recurrent DRESS episode due to the administration of unfractionated heparin, which was later replaced with low-molecular-weight heparin during hospitalization. Treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamines was initiated, resulting in the resolution of this episode. Ultimately, the patient required the Ross procedure. During this intervention the anticoagulation strategy was modified, unfractionated heparin was replaced with bivalirudin during the procedure and fondaparinux was administered during the postoperative period. This resulted in stable transaminases levels and no eosinophilia.ConclusionThe severity of DRESS Syndrome underscores the importance of early recognition, heightened monitoring, and a comprehensive approach tailored to each patient’s needs. This particular case highlights the significance of this approach and may have a substantial clinical impact since it provides alternatives to heparin, such as bivalirudin and fondaparinux, in the anticoagulation strategy of CPB for patients who have a hypersensibility reaction to this medication; thus, enhancing clinical outcomes by minimizing risks linked to adverse drug reactions.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome without Eosinophilia: A Complication Secondary to Aceclofenac

Abstract A 27-year-old male presented with fever, oral ulcers, and generalized lymphadenopathy 5 days following consuming aceclofenac for toothache. He had hepatosplenomegaly in ultrasonography and transaminitis on investigations. After ruling out the other causes by appropriate tests, he was diagnosed with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) due to aceclofenac and was treated with systemic steroids with good outcomes. We describe a patient with DRESS due to aceclofenac in the absence of eosinophilia which is extremely unusual. Early recognition of DRESS is essential for proper management which can reduce mortality.

Risperidone Induced DRESS Syndrome: A case report

IntroductionDRESS (Drug Reaction with Eoshinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) syndrome, also called DIHS (Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome) is a rare drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity reaction that can be potentially life-threatening (Choudhary et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2013; 6 -7). Risperidone is an antipsychotic drug with significant antagonist activity at the 5-HT2 and the D2 receptors. It has been reported that risperidone may be effective in controlling agitation, delusion, hallucination, and withdrawal behavior in geriatric patients (Yunusa &amp; El Helou. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:596).Objectives The aim of this study is to demonstrate the case of developed DRESS syndrome following the use of risperidone.Methods The 81-year-old female patient was admitted to the Dermatology Clinic due to skin rash, high fever and leukocytosis following the use of risperidone. The patient was consulted to Psychiatry.Results In her history it was determined that risperidone 0.5 mg/d was started to the patient with depression due to agitative symptom. On the 4th day of treatment, targeoid lesions, starting from the back and spreading first to the trunk and then to the extremities, were observed. Further laboratory examinations revealed that the fever was measured at 39.5 C°, liver enzymes were elevated (ALT= 119 IU/ lt, AST= 124 IU /lt), and significant leukocytosis (WBC =12.000) was present along with the lesions. The patient was planned to be hospitalized to Dermatology Clinic on the 5th day and risperidone was stopped. The patient’s agitation increased and following the risperidone discontinuation thereupon the lesions tended to fade and desquamation began. After the treatment of the DRESS syndrome, aripiprazole was given to the patient for agitative symptom. The level of agitation symptoms decreased, and the patient tolerated aripiprazole well without any observed side effects.Image:ConclusionsWhen initiating medication for the elderly population to address agitation, considering such rare side effects can prevent the patient from being hospitalized due to DRESS syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report associated with DRESS syndrome and risperidone treatment thus, it is necessary to be very careful when starting psychotropic medication for elderly patients.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome induced by first-line antitubercular medication: A case series

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome induced by first-line antitubercular medication: A case series

DRESS syndrome: More than just a rash.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is rare but carries significant mortality and morbidity, making early identification and definitive management crucial. The diagnosis of DRESS is made clinically and involves consideration of a broad list of differential diagnoses. Given variable clinical presentations among patients with DRESS syndrome, clinicians should look for common findings and other hallmarks of the syndrome while monitoring for known complications. Additionally, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion to avoid missing more mild presentations, such as in this case patient with DRESS syndrome minor.