Side Effects Of Systemic Corticosteroids Research Articles

Intratracheal budesonide mixed with surfactant to increase survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants: statistical analysis plan for the international, multicenter, randomized PLUSS trial

BackgroundBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), an inflammatory-mediated chronic lung disease, is common in extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation and is associated with an increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes in childhood. Effective and safe prophylactic therapies for BPD are urgently required. Systemic corticosteroids reduce rates of BPD in the short term but are associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes if given to ventilated infants in the first week after birth. Intratracheal administration of corticosteroid admixed with exogenous surfactant could overcome these concerns by minimizing systemic sequelae. Several small, randomized trials have found intratracheal budesonide in a surfactant vehicle to be a promising therapy to increase survival free of BPD. The primary objective of the PLUSS trial is to determine whether intratracheal budesonide mixed with surfactant increases survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA) in extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation.MethodsAn international, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial of intratracheal budesonide (a corticosteroid) mixed with surfactant for extremely preterm infants to increase survival free of BPD at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA; primary outcome). Extremely preterm infants aged < 48 h after birth are eligible if (1) they are mechanically ventilated, or (2) they are receiving non-invasive respiratory support and there is a clinical decision to treat with surfactant. The intervention is budesonide (0.25 mg/kg) mixed with poractant alfa (200 mg/kg first intervention, 100 mg/kg if second intervention), administered intratracheally via an endotracheal tube or thin catheter. The comparator is poractant alfa alone (at the same doses). Secondary outcomes include the components of the primary outcome (death, BPD prior to or at 36 weeks’ PMA), and potential systemic side effects of corticosteroids. Longer-term outcomes will be published separately, and include cost-effectiveness, early childhood health until 2 years of age, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age (corrected for prematurity).Statistical analysis planA sample size of 1038 infants (519 in each group) is required to provide 90% power to detect a relative increase in survival free of BPD of 20% (an absolute increase of 10%), from the anticipated event rate of 50% in the control arm to 60% in the intervention (budesonide) arm, alpha error 0.05. To allow for up to 2% of study withdrawals or losses to follow-up, PLUSS aimed to enroll a total of 1060 infants (530 in each arm). The binary primary outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of infants who were alive without BPD at 36 weeks’ PMA for each randomization group. To estimate the difference in risk (with 95% CI), between the treatment and control arms, binary regression (a generalized linear multivariable model with an identity link function and binomial distribution) will be used. Along with the primary outcome, the individual components of the primary outcome (death, and physiological BPD at 36 weeks’ PMA), will be reported by randomization group and, again, binary regression will be used to estimate the risk difference between the two treatment groups for survival and physiological BPD at 36 weeks’ PMA.

Intratracheal budesonide mixed with surfactant to increase survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants: study protocol for the international, multicenter, randomized PLUSS trial

BackgroundBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), an inflammatory-mediated chronic lung disease, is common in extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation and is associated with an increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes in childhood. Effective and safe prophylactic therapies for BPD are urgently required. Systemic corticosteroids reduce rates of BPD in the short-term but are associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes if given to ventilated infants in the first week after birth. Intratracheal administration of corticosteroid admixed with exogenous surfactant could overcome these concerns by minimizing systemic sequelae. Several small, randomized trials have found intratracheal budesonide in a surfactant vehicle to be a promising therapy to increase survival free of BPD.MethodsAn international, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial of intratracheal budesonide (a corticosteroid) mixed with surfactant for extremely preterm infants to increase survival free of BPD at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA; primary outcome). Extremely preterm infants aged < 48 h after birth are eligible if: (1) they are mechanically ventilated, or (2) they are receiving non-invasive respiratory support and there is a clinical decision to treat with surfactant. The intervention is budesonide (0.25 mg/kg) mixed with poractant alfa (200 mg/kg first intervention, 100 mg/kg if second intervention), administered intratracheally via an endotracheal tube or thin catheter. The comparator is poractant alfa alone (at the same doses). Secondary outcomes include the components of the primary outcome (death, BPD prior to or at 36 weeks’ PMA), potential systemic side effects of corticosteroids, cost-effectiveness, early childhood health until 2 years of age, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age (corrected for prematurity).DiscussionCombining budesonide with surfactant for intratracheal administration is a simple intervention that may reduce BPD in extremely preterm infants and translate into health benefits in later childhood. The PLUSS trial is powered for the primary outcome and will address gaps in the evidence due to its pragmatic and inclusive design, targeting all extremely preterm infants regardless of their initial mode of respiratory support. Should intratracheal budesonide mixed with surfactant increase survival free of BPD, without severe adverse effects, this readily available intervention could be introduced immediately into clinical practice.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au), ACTRN12617000322336. First registered on 28th February 2017.

Multidisciplinary consensus on a stepwise treatment algorithm for management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Multidisciplinary consensus on a stepwise treatment algorithm for management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Adjuvant Inhaled Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Review Article.

Community-acquired pneumonia is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Since the inflammatory response induced by the immune system is often a major contributor to the lung injury, it becomes reasonable to assess the potential benefit of anti-inflammatory agents in treating community-acquired pneumonia. The role of corticosteroids as adjunct anti-inflammatory agents in treating community-acquired pneumonia is still controversial. Several studies have assessed the benefit of their use in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. In most of those studies, the route of corticosteroids administration was systemic. The aim of this article is to provide a concise review of the role of corticosteroids in treating community-acquired pneumonia when administered via inhalational route, with the potential benefit of avoiding systemic side effects of corticosteroids while exerting the same anti-inflammatory effects on the lungs. Conclusion: the use of inhaled corticosteroids may be of benefit in certain patient subsets with community-acquired pneumonia. Further randomized controlled trials are needed for better determination of such patient subsets.

A review on function and side effects of systemic corticosteroids used in high-grade COVID-19 to prevent cytokine storms.

In December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), officially known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Cytokine storm is an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response resulting from the release of large amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that occurs at phase 3 of viral infection. Such emergence led to the development of many clinical trials to discover efficient drugs and therapeutic protocols to fight with this single-stranded RNA virus. Corticosteroids suppress inflammation of the lungs during the cytokine storm, weaken immune responses, and inhibit the elimination of pathogen. For this reason, in COVID-19 corticosteroid therapy, systemic inhibition of inflammation is observed with a wide range of side effects. The present review discusses the effectiveness of the corticosteroid application in COVID-19 infection and the related side effects of these agents. In summary, a number of corticosteroids, including and especially methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, particularly for COVID-19 patients who underwent mechanical ventilation.

How Frequently Is Asthma Objectively Demonstrated before Starting a Biologic? Quality Assessment of a Group Practice of Allergists and Immunologists

Worldwide, asthma-related healthcare cost remains a major burden. Individuals with severe asthma account for 50% of that cost. Although they are expensive, biologics such as anti-IL5 and anti-IgE agents promise cost-effectiveness when judiciously used to decrease asthma-related hospitalization and the debilitating side effects of systemic corticosteroids. Before considering biologics to treat patients with asthma, current guidelines recommend confirmation of asthma and control of comorbid diseases. Diagnostic confirmation of asthma can be challenging among individuals with severe asthma. In this quality assessment study, we determined the frequency of objective asthma confirmation and addressing of comorbidities prior to starting biologics at a group practice of allergists and immunologists. We surveyed our specialty providers to understand habit(s) leading to the observed results. We identified 40 adult patients who started on biologic modifiers for asthma over the past 5 years. Only 58% of these patients had a proper diagnosis of asthma. Providers underutilized several diagnostic methods that may prove useful in confirming asthma diagnosis in this patient population. The factors contributing to poor asthma control were rarely addressed. A sense of urgency to initiate biologics was the primary reason for the observed results. Further interventions are needed to improve asthma diagnosis and management prior to the initiation of biologic therapeutics.

Corticosteroid Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema.

Diabetic macular edema is the most common cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus. The pathogenesis of macular edema is complex and multifactorial. For many years, laser photocoagulation has been considered the standard therapy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema; however, few patients achieve significant improvements in visual acuity. Today the intravitreal administration of anti-inflammatory or anti-angiogenic agents together with the use of laser photocoagulation represents the standard of care for the treatment of this complication. The intravitreal route of administration minimizes the systemic side effects of corticosteroids. Steroid-related ocular side effects are elevated intraocular pressure and cataract, while injection-related complications include endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment. In order to reduce the risks and complications, intravitreal implants have been developed recently to provide sustained release of corticosteroids and reduce repeated injections for the management of diabetic macular edema. In this review, the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential of intravitreal corticosteroids in diabetic macular edema are discussed with a review of recent literature.

Corticosteroid in various Oral lesions

Corticosteroids, since their introduction have become one of the most widely prescribed class of drugs. They belong to a class of chemicals that includes steroid hormones that are produced naturally in the adrenal cortex of vertebrates and analogous to those that are synthesized in laboratories. They have been used extensively in managing many oral lesions due to their excellent anti-inflammatory and immunemodulators effects. However, considering their potential and significant side effects, they are sometimes termed as the “double –edge sword” in the field of medicine. Their successful use depends upon the comprehension of the disease process. This includes an appropriate diagnosis, a clear view of the desirable treatment outcome and understanding of whether the treatment is aimed at the management of a chronic disease or enhanced resolution of a short – term condition. The possible side effects of systemic corticosteroids must be weighed against probable risks. This article is aimed at reviewing the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of various oral lesions, and deriving a certain protocol for the same.Update Dent. Coll. j: 2016; 6 (1): 52-58

Retrospective cohort analysis of healthcare claims in the United States characterising asthma exacerbations in paediatric patients

Background Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and places a significant burden on public and private health systems. This retrospective cohort analysis utilised administrative healthcare claims data (US Clinformatics™ Multiplan database; compliant with the US Department of Health & Human Services Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) to characterise asthma exacerbations requiring intervention in a US paediatric patient population.Methods Patients aged > 1–17 years with a recorded asthma diagnosis and receiving treatment were identified in the US Clinformatics™ Multiplan database over a 9-year period (2004–2012). Both incident and prevalent cases of asthma were included, with the most recently recorded asthma diagnosis designated as the index date. The 12-month period following the index date was analysed for asthma exacerbations, defined as an event requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroid or resulting in an asthma-related hospitalisation or emergency department visit.Results Data from 734,114 children with asthma (41.5 % females, 58.5 % males) were analysed, of this cohort 34.4 % experienced ≥ 1 exacerbation during the follow-up period. The proportion who experienced ≥ 1 exacerbation increased from 28.9 % in 2004 to 36.3 % in 2012, based on the reported index date. Their mean annual exacerbation frequency was 1.4; 85.8 % of exacerbations were defined by systemic corticosteroids use. A consistent trend of increased exacerbation incidence in the fall and early winter was observed, in particular exacerbations defined by systemic corticosteroid use. A greater proportion of asthma-related hospitalisations were associated with younger age.Conclusions Approximately one-third of children experienced ≥ 1 exacerbation in real-world clinical practice. A targeted treatment approach with a focus on those with a history of recurrent exacerbations is recommended to improve asthma control. This targeted approach could also minimise the frequent systemic corticosteroid exposure particularly at an early age when side effects of systemic corticosteroids are more pronounced.

Severe Corticosteroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension Requiring Bilateral Trabeculectomies in a Patient with Takayasu's Arteritis.

We present a rare case of severe corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension (OHT) after prolonged systemic corticosteroid use in a young woman with Takayasu's arteritis. As she did not sufficiently respond to ocular antihypertensive therapies, bilateral enhanced trabeculectomies were required to normalize her intraocular pressures. The systemic side effects of corticosteroids are well known, yet steroid-induced OHT and glaucoma remain silent causes of ocular morbidity. This case highlights the importance of IOP-monitoring in visually asymptomatic patients on systemic corticosteroids. It further emphasizes the need to raise awareness of the potential ocular side effects of steroids amongst physicians, in particular those looking after patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

An Interesting Side Effect of Topical Steroids: Nipple Hypertrophy

Observations: There are many local and systemic side-effects of corticosteroids. To the best of our knowledge, enlargement of the nipple due to topical corticosteroids has not been reported previously. We report a 17-year old, male patient who started himself a topical corticosteroid clobetasol 17propionate because of itching complaint at his left nipple. After 4 months of initiation of treatment, he developed unilateral left nipple hypertrophy. Based on patient history, clinical and laboratory findings and the exclusion of other diagnoses, the hypertrophy of the nipple points out the use of a topical corticosteroid. With this case we wanted to draw attention of clinicians about an interesting side effect of a topical corticosteroid.

The Role of Corticosteroids in Celiac Disease

Since Dickie first described the benefits of a gluten-freediet in the 1940s and 1950s, this diet is the standard of carefor all patients with celiac disease [1, 2]. For patients with anew diagnosis, dietary compliance can be difficult toachieve, possibly resulting in a clinical course marked bydelayed recovery and persistent symptoms. This is of par-ticular concern for patients in the developing world, wheregluten-free food items may be difficult to obtain or toidentify. While dietary modifications are likely to remainthe treatment of choice in celiac disease, the use of adju-vant corticosteroids in newly diagnosed patients is a topicthat has been addressed previously. In this issue ofDigestive Diseases and Sciences, Shalimar et al. [3] revisitthe concept of corticosteroids in the management of celiacdisease, focusing on their effects on cellular death andregeneration. Their objective was to identify whetheradjuvant treatment with corticosteroids can help expediteclinical and histological recovery in patients with newlydiagnosed celiac disease.The use of systemic corticosteroids for severe celiacdisease is not new. Dr. Jerry Trier [4, 5] described their usein severe disease in 1978 and in subsequent reviews.Currently, the most common indication for the use ofcorticosteroids in celiac disease is the treatment of refrac-tory symptoms. Refractory celiac disease is defined aspersistent malabsorption symptoms and villous atrophydespite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet for6–12 months [5, 6]. There are two subtypes of refractoryceliac disease: type 1 disease is characterized by normalintra-epithelial lymphocytes, whereas type 2 disease ischaracterized by aberrant intra-epithelial lymphocytes ofclonal origin. Type 2 disease has an extremely poorprognosis as it is considered a cryptic T cell lymphomawith a high rate of progression to enteropathy-associated Tcell lymphoma (EATL) [6]. Although both subtypesrespond to corticosteroids, type 1 patients may need addi-tional immunosuppression, but usually do well, whereasthose with type 2 disease may respond initially but oftenlater deteriorate [6]. Corticosteroids, however, remain themainstay of treatment for refractory celiac disease.A second and less common indication for the use cor-ticosteroids in celiac disease is for the treatment of life-threatening celiac crisis. Although rare, celiac crisis isassociated with high morbidity and mortality rates andnecessitates immediate intervention and supportive care[7]. The goal of treatment is to promptly reverse mucosaldamage and metabolic derangements. Although cortico-steroids have not yet been studied prospectively, they havehistorically been given to individuals who are notresponding rapidly enough to gluten restriction. Theauthors of a recent retrospective study of patients withceliac crisis reported that patients who received cortico-steroids experienced rapid clinical improvement within2 weeks of treatment initiation and were eventually able tobe maintained on a gluten-free diet alone [7]. The datafrom this study set a precedent for the short-term use ofcorticosteroids when prompt reversal of symptoms isneeded.Due to the systemic side effects of systemic cortico-steroids, interest in locally active corticosteroids hasincreased. Evidence confirming their effectiveness in celiacdisease first came from in vitro studies involving samplesof intestinal mucosa in tissue culture. In 1981, Brambleet al. [8] examined intestinal enzyme activity in patients

Indications et complications des corticoïdes en ophtalmologie

Most common side effects of systemic corticosteroids are posterior subcapsular cataract and glaucoma. There is no way to prevent corticosteroid-induced cataract. The risk of these complications varies (cataract 11 to 15%; glaucoma 12.8%), and it depends on the dose, duration of administration and terrain. The discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy is required in cases of uncontrolled glaucoma by hypotonic treatment. Long-term topical or general steroids prescription has to be done after an ophthalmological examination. Indications of ophthalmic general corticosteroids are acute orbital and ocular inflammations. affecting the middle and posterior segments of the eye, or sclera when topical treatment is ineffective. When administered topically, only 5% of the delivered dose is absorbed by the anterior segment, distribution is almost zero in the middle and posterior segments of the eye.

Complications ophtalmologiques des corticoïdes systémiques

The article reviews the ophthalmologic side effects of systemic corticosteroids. These side effects include involvement of both anterior (cataract, ocular hypertension) and posterior (serous central chorioretinopathy) segements of the eye. We review the clinical presentations and detail the advance in the knowledge still incomplete of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the occurrence of these complications. The clinical knowledge of the ophthalmologic side effects of systemic corticosteroids is essential to inform our patients, and prevent or detect these complications to treat them appropriately.

Steroids in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are nebulized and systemic forms comparable?

Systemic corticosteroids are strongly recommended in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As COPD patients are usually elderly and are relatively immobile, side effects of systemic corticosteroids frequently outweigh their beneficial effects. On the contrary, nebulized corticosteroid solutions have a negligible systemic side-effect profile. In this review, as an alternative to systemic corticosteroids, the place of nebulized corticosteroids in exacerbation periods of COPD was summarized. The number of trials in the literature is increasing. Regarding the available data, high dose nebulized budesonide was found as effective as systemic corticosteroids in exacerbations of COPD. The side-effect profile, blood glucose level in particular, is better for nebulized budesonide. Findings from recent studies are giving a positive impression on the role of high dose nebulized budesonide in exacerbations of COPD. However, larger and statistically high powered trials testing different types of nebulized corticosteroid solutions with varying dosages are still lacking. Before recommending the routine use of nebulized corticosteroids in exacerbations, present findings need to be confirmed with further studies of high quality.

Pemphigus

Pemphigus refers to a group of potentially life-threatening autoimmune diseases of the skin and mucous membranes, characterized by the formation of blisters and erosions of the skin. An autoimmune process, directed against keratinocyte desmosomal cadherins, interferes with the adhesive function of these molecules. This results in the separation of keratinocytes and clinical manifestation of blistering. Differences in the particular antigens targeted by the antibodies and in the distribution of these antigens in the different regions of the body and in the separate layers of the epidermis result in different clinical manifestations of the disease. Diagnosis of pemphigus is based on three independent groups of criteria: clinical features (flaccid blisters and erosions on skin and oral mucosa), histologic findings (epidermal acantholysis) and immunological tests (circulating and skin-fixed antibodies against keratinocyte surface antigens). The principle aim of treatment is to reduce inflammatory response and autoantibody production, thereby achieving disease remission.Systemic corticosteroids are still the most useful drugs in the treatment of pemphigus and continue to be the mainstay of therapy for this disease.Adjuvant drugs, such as immunosuppressants, are commonly used in combination, in order to increase efficacy and have a steroid-sparing effect,thereby allowing reduced maintenance doses and less side effects of systemic corticosteroids. Other options include intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis. However, more research is needed to develop treatments with the least possible toxicity.

The spectrum of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease in Tunisia, North Africa

To analyze the clinical profile of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease in Tunisia, North Africa. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 49 patients diagnosed with VKH disease at the Department of Ophthalmology of Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia, between January 1994 and September 2005. Of all the uveitis cases diagnosed during the study period, VKH disease was the fourth most commonly occurring type (7.4%). Thirty-two patients (65.3%) were female, and 17 patients (34.7%) were male. The mean age at disease onset was 35 years (range: 16-54 years). The majority of patients (51%) had probable VKH disease, followed by incomplete type (47%); only 2% had the complete type. At presentation, 47 patients (96%) had bilateral ocular involvement. Clinical presentation was a panuveitis in 25 patients (51%) and a posterior uveitis in 24 patients (49%). Visual acuity (VA) at presentation ranged from less than 20/200 (40.8%) to more than 20/40 (28.5%). All patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids for 2-19 months (mean: 10.5 months). Four patients (8%) were treated with cyclosporin because of serious systemic side effects of corticosteroids. Complications included cataract in 18 eyes (33.9%), glaucoma in nine eyes (16.96%) and choroidal neovascularization in one eye (1%). Fifty-eight eyes (59%) had a final VA of 20/40 or better. Factors associated with a poor VA at the final follow-up were the presence of a poor VA at presentation (P = 0.02), the occurrence of complications (P = 0.001) and/or recurrences (P = 0.02). In Tunisia, VKH disease is a common cause of uveitis that predominantly affects young women. The overwhelming majority (98%) have probable or incomplete VKH disease, presenting as panuveitis or posterior uveitis. More than 50% of patients undergoing treatment with corticosteroids will maintain a VA of 20/40 or better.

Minimizing side effects of systemic corticosteroids in children

Corticosteroids are potent drugs used in management of various inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. The antiinflammatory effects of corticosteroids cannot however be separated from their metabolic effects. Children are more vulnerable to their side effects, particularly the effects on growth, immunity and adrenal suppression. It is essential for the treating physician to be aware of the side effects and the measures to be taken to minimize them. A side effect that is unique to children is growth suppression, which is helped by alternate day treatment. Administration of small doses of prednisolone (10-15 mg/day or velocity significantly. The potency of dexamethasone and betamethasone in suppressing growth is nearly 18 times higher than that of prednisolone. There is some evidence that the administration of growth hormone can reverse these changes.

Update on uveomeningoencephalitides

Uveomeningoencephalitides, commonly known as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease, are characterized by chronic bilateral granulomatous panuveitis involving the central nervous, auditory and integumentary systems. Visual prognosis is generally favourable, but outcomes in patients with VKH disease may vary. Also, the treatment of choice differs in different parts of the world. This review addresses the literature on the possible pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of this disorder. Atypical presentations of VKH disease, as well as those associated with interferon-alpha therapy, have been reported. Most reports suggest an association with autoimmunity. The diagnostic criteria were revised by the International Workshop on VKH in 1999, allowing for the presence of different ocular findings in the early and late stages of the disease. New techniques have also been developed to aid in the rapid diagnosis of VKH disease and evaluation of treatment. Different routes of administration of corticosteroid and adjuvant therapy were tried, with positive results. Although the pathogenesis of VKH disease is uncertain and antigen-specific treatment strategies have not yet been developed, reports increasingly suggest an autoimmune nature for uveomeningoencephalitides. Currently, systemic corticosteroid therapy remains the standard initial treatment. Different routes of administration are used to reduce the frequency of side effects of systemic corticosteroids, and there are various adjuvant therapies. With the aid of modern equipment, early diagnosis and prompt and appropriate treatment, resulting in better visual outcomes, can be anticipated. A large-scale, multinational, prospective study is warranted to determine the optimal initial therapy.

The Risks of Systemic Corticosteroid Use

Because of their potent antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive properties, systemic corticosteroids are used to modify a vast array of diseases. This class of drugs, however, has the potential to produce multiple adverse effects presenting the dermatologist with difficult decisions in the management of patients with potentially steroid responsive disorders. This article reviews the side effects of systemic corticosteroids, comments on strategies to minimize these side effects, as well as, outlining suggested mechanisms by which physicians may minimize the risks of medical legal consequences owing to adverse reactions to these drugs.