Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Patients Research Articles

Characteristics of long COVID in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Numerous cases of long coronavirus disease (long COVID) have been reported in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Despite the reviews on clinical manifestations of long COVID in the general population, systematic reviews on ARD patients are scarce. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients. We searched the literature in PubMed and Embase as of 27 December 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies relevant to long COVID in ARD patients were collected. Stratification based on the severity of COVID infection and subtypes of rheumatic diseases [systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) vs non-autoimmune rheumatic disease (NARD)] was also undertaken. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis. A total of 15 relevant studies were identified from the literature. The prevalence of long COVID was 56% (95% CI 34, 76) in 2995 patients. Hospitalized COVID patients had a higher proportion of long COVID than non-hospitalized patients. The prevalence of long COVID was similar between SARD and NARD patients. In terms of symptoms, fatigue, arthralgia and pain were commonly reported in long COVID patients with ARDs. The characteristics of long COVID in ARD patients are generally similar to those in the general population despite a higher prevalence and a higher proportion of arthralgia and pain.

Novel multiclass classification machine learning approach for the early-stage classification of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) encompass a diverse group of complex conditions with overlapping clinical features, making accurate diagnosis challenging. This study aims to develop a multiclass machine learning (ML) model for early-stage SARDs classification using accessible laboratory indicators. A total of 925 SARDs patients were included, categorised into SLE, Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and inflammatory myositis (IM). Clinical characteristics and laboratory markers were collected and nine key indicators, including anti-dsDNA, anti-SS-A60, anti-Sm/nRNP, antichromatin, anti-dsDNA (indirect immunofluorescence assay), haemoglobin (Hb), platelet, neutrophil percentage and cytoplasmic patterns (AC-19, AC-20), were selected for model building. Various ML algorithms were used to construct a tripartite classification ML model. Patients were divided into two cohorts, cohort 1 was used to construct a tripartite classification model. Among models assessed, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing SLE, IM and SS (with area under curve=0.953, 0.903 and 0.836; accuracy= 0.892, 0.869 and 0.857; sensitivity= 0.890, 0.868 and 0.795; specificity= 0.910, 0.836 and 0.748; positive predictive value=0.922, 0.727 and 0.663; and negative predictive value= 0.854, 0.915 and 0.879). The RF model excelled in classifying SLE (precision=0.930, recall=0.985, F1 score=0.957). For IM and SS, RF model outcomes were (precision=0.793, 0.950; recall=0.920, 0.679; F1 score=0.852, 0.792). Cohort 2 served as an external validation set, achieving an overall accuracy of 87.3%. Individual classification performances for SLE, SS and IM were excellent, with precision, recall and F1 scores specified. SHAP analysis highlighted significant contributions from antibody profiles. This pioneering multiclass ML model, using basic laboratory indicators, enhances clinical feasibility and demonstrates promising potential for SARDs classification. The collaboration of clinical expertise and ML offers a nuanced approach to SARDs classification, with potential for enhanced patient care.

404. Impact of cross-coronavirus humoral immunity in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases patients

Abstract Background Beyond the acute illness caused by SARS-CoV-2, about one-fifth of infections unpredictably result in long-term persistence of symptoms despite the apparent clearance of infection. Insights into the mechanisms that underlie post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) will be critical for the prevention and clinical management of long-term complications of COVID-19. Several hypotheses have been proposed that may account for the development of PASC, including persistence of virus or the dysregulation of immunity. Among the immunological changes noted in PASC, alterations in humoral immunity have been observed in some patient subsets. Methods To begin to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 or other pathogen specific humoral immune responses evolve uniquely in PASC, we performed comprehensive antibody profiling against SARS-CoV-2, a panel of endemic pathogens, and a panel of routine vaccine antigens using Systems Serology in two independent cohorts of patients with pre-existing systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) who either developed or did not develop PASC. Results A distinct qualitative shift observed in Fcγ receptor binding was observed in individuals with PASC. Specifically, individuals with PASC harbored weaker Fcγ receptor binding anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and a significantly stronger Fcγ receptor binding antibody response against endemic Coronavirus OC43. Individuals with PASC, further, generated more avid IgM responses and developed an OC43 S2-specific antibody response with stronger Fcγ-receptor binding, linked to cross reactivity across SARS-CoV-2 and common coronaviruses. Conclusion These findings from two independent cohorts implicate previous common Coronavirus imprinting as a marker for the development of PASC in individuals with SARDs. Disclosures Douglas A. Lauffenburger, PhD, Sanofi: Board Member|Sanofi: Honoraria|Sanofi: Honoraria Zachary Wallace, MD, MSc, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Grant/Research Support|Horizon: Advisor/Consultant|MedPace: Advisor/Consultant|Principia/Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Viela Bio: Advisor/Consultant|Zenas BioPharma: Advisor/Consultant Jeffrey Sparks, MD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Amgen: Advisor/Consultant|Boehringer Ingelheim: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Inova Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Optum: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant Galit Alter, PhD, Leyden Labs: Ownership Interest|Moderna Therapeutics: Employee|Seromyx Systems: Ownership Interest

Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease patients during the early COVID-19 pandemic.

Given reports of increased prevalence of PTSD symptoms at COVID-19 pandemic onset, we aimed to assess the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms at pandemic onset in individuals with and without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). In May 2020, we invited 6678 patients to complete the Brief Trauma Questionnaire and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5), validated PTSD symptom screenings. We compared responses from patients with and without SARD using multivariable logistic regression. We received 1473 responses (22% response rate) from 5/2020 to 9/2021 (63 with prior PTSD diagnoses, 138 with SARD history). The SARD population was more female (p .0001) and had a higher baseline prevalence of stress disorders (56% vs. 43%, p .004). SARD subjects reported more experiences with life-threatening illness, 60%, versus 53% among those without SARD (p .13), and more antidepressant or anxiolytic medication use pre-pandemic (78% vs. 59%, p .0001). Adjusting for pre-pandemic PTSD diagnosis, younger age and history of stress disorder were the most significant predictors of PCL-5 positivity. There were no significant differences in PCL-5 score or positivity among those with or without SARD. In this population, patients with SARD had a higher pre-COVID-19 prevalence of stress-related conditions, but it was not the case that they had an increased risk of PTSD symptoms in the early pandemic. Younger individuals, those with baseline depression, anxiety, or adjustment disorders, and those taking antidepressant or anxiolytic medications were more likely to have PTSD symptoms in the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Risk factors and outcomes for repeat COVID-19 infection among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A case-control study

ObjectiveTo investigate risk factors and outcomes of repeat COVID-19 infections among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). MethodsWe performed a case-control study investigating repeat COVID-19 infection within the Mass General Brigham Health Care System. We systematically identified all SARD patients with confirmed COVID-19 (15/Mar/2020 to 17/Oct/2022). Cases had confirmed repeat COVID-19 infections >60 days apart (index date: repeat COVID-19 date). Controls were matched to cases (up to 3:1) by calendar date of first infection and duration between first COVID-19 infection and index dates. We collected demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, SARD features, and COVID-19 characteristics at initial infection and index date by medical record review. We used conditional logistic regression to identify associations with repeat COVID-19 infection, adjusting for potential confounders. We described the severity of repeat COVID-19 infection among cases. ResultsAmong 2203 SARD patients with COVID-19, we identified 76 cases with repeat COVID-19 infection (80.3 % female) and matched to 207 matched controls (77.8 % female) with no repeat infection. At first infection, cases were younger (mean 49.5 vs. 60.3 years, p < 0.0001), less likely to have hypertension (32.9 % vs. 45.9 %, p = 0.050), and less likely to have been hospitalized for COVID-19 (13.2 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.037) than controls. At index date, cases were more likely than controls to be rituximab users (18.4 % vs. 6.3 %, p = 0.0021). In the multivariable model, younger age (OR 0.67 per 10 years, 95 %CI 0.54–0.82), rituximab use vs. non-use (OR 3.38, 95 %CI 1.26–9.08), and methotrexate use vs. non-use (OR 2.24, 95 %CI 1.08–4.61) were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection. Among those with repeat COVID-19 infection, 5/76 (6.6 %) were hospitalized and there were no deaths. ConclusionYounger age, rituximab, and methotrexate were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection risk among patients with SARDs. Reassuringly, there were no deaths, and the hospitalization rate was low among those with repeat COVID-19 infection.

Prevalence and identification of neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an international mixed methods study.

A limited range of neuropsychiatric symptoms have been reported in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), with varied symptom prevalence. This study aimed to investigate a wider range of potential symptoms than previous studies, compare patient self-reports with clinician estimates, and explore barriers to symptom identification. Mixed methods were used. Data from SARDs patients (n = 1853) were compared with controls (n = 463) and clinicians (n = 289). In-depth interviews (n = 113) were analysed thematically. Statistical tests compared means of survey items between patients and controls, 8 different SARD groups, and clinician specialities. Self-reported lifetime prevalences of all 30 neuropsychiatric symptoms investigated (including cognitive, sensorimotor and psychiatric) were significantly higher in SARDs than controls. Validated instruments assessed 55% of SARDs patients as currently having depression and 57% anxiety. Barriers to identifying neuropsychiatric symptoms included: (i) limits to knowledge, guidelines, objective tests and inter-speciality cooperation; (ii) subjectivity, invisibility and believability of symptoms; and (iii) under-eliciting, under-reporting and under-documenting. A lower proportion of clinicians (4%) reported never/rarely asking patients about mental health symptoms than the 74% of patients who reported never/rarely being asked in clinic (P < 0.001). Over 50% of SARDs patients had never/rarely reported their mental health symptoms to clinicians, a proportion underestimated at <10% by clinicians (P < 0.001). Neuropsychiatric symptom self-reported prevalences are significantly higher in SARDs than controls, and are greatly underestimated by most clinicians. Research relying on medical records and current guidelines is unlikely to accurately reflect patients' experiences of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Improved inter-speciality communication and greater patient involvement is needed in SARD care and research.

Antibody responses following the surge of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

The surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant Omicron infections has affected most Chinese residents at the end of 2022, including a number of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). To investigate the antibody level of the Omicron variant in SARD patients after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, we tested BA.5.2 and BF.7 Omicron variant IgG antibody levels using ELISA on blood samples collected from 102 SARD patients and 19 healthy controls (HCs). The type of SARD, demographics, concurrent treatment, doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and outcomes were also recorded. A total of 102 SARD patients (mean age: 40.3 years; 89.2% female), including 60 SLE, 32 RA and 10 other SARDs, were identified. Of these, 87 (85.3%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2. We found that the BA.5.2 and BF.7 antibody levels of infected SARD patients were lower than those of HCs (P < 0.05). Sixty-five (63.7%) patients had at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. SARD patients with at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine had a higher level of BA.5.2 and BF.7 antibodies than the unvaccinated group (P < 0.05). There was no evidence for a significant inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids (GCs) on the BA.5.2 and BF.7 Omicron variant antibody levels in SARD patients. SLE patients using biologic DMARDs had a lower BA.5.2 Omicron variant antibody level than patients using GCs and/or HCQ. These data suggest that patients with SARDs had a lower antibody response than HCs after Omicron infection.

Interferon and interferon-induced cytokines as markers of impending clinical progression in ANA+ individuals without a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease diagnosis

BackgroundElevated levels of interferons (IFNs) are a characteristic feature of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and may be useful in predicting impending symptomatic progression in anti-nuclear antibody-positive (ANA+) individuals lacking a SARD diagnosis. Typically, these are measured by their effect on gene expression in the blood, which has limited their utility in clinical settings. Here, we assessed whether the measurement of serum IFN-α or selected IFN-induced cytokines accurately mirrors IFN-induced gene expression in ANA+ individuals and investigated their utility as biomarkers of clinical progression.MethodsA total of 280 subjects were studied, including 50 ANA− healthy controls, 160 ANA+ individuals without a SARD diagnosis (96 asymptomatic, 64 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease), and 70 SARD patients. IFN-induced gene expression was measured by nanoString and cytokine levels by ELISA or Simoa. ANA+ individuals lacking a SARD diagnosis who had the new onset of SARD criteria over the subsequent 2 years were defined as progressors.ResultsMeasurement of IFN-α levels by high-sensitivity ELISA or Simoa correlated much better with IFN-induced gene expression than measurement of CXCL-10 or Galectin-9 levels. Despite this, high CXCL-10 and Galectin-9 levels were better predictors of subsequent progression in ANA+ individuals than measures of IFN-α or IFN-induced gene expression with the optimal combination of predictive cytokines (CXCL-10 and IFN-α as measured by ELISA), resulting in a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%.ConclusionEasily performed ELISA assays for CXCL-10 and IFN-α can be used to predict ANA+ individuals at high risk of imminent symptomatic progression.

Prevalence of Anti-Dense Fine Speckled 70 Antibodies in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Healthy Controls: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Recognition of Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) pattern is challenging as it is frequently confused with speckled or homogeneous patterns. Identification and confirmation of DFS pattern is important as it is more often seen in healthy individuals, routine laboratory referrals with relatively lesser prevalence in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (SARD). As there is limited data on the prevalence of DFS pattern in Indian population, present study determined the prevalence and clinical significance of DFS pattern followed by anti-DFS 70 Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for confirmation. Aim: To estimate the prevalence of anti-DFS 70 antibodies in ANA screening tests, SARD, and healthy individuals by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) screening and confirmation by anti- DFS 70 ELISA. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 15 months from January 2017 to April 2018 at Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, a tertiary care institute in Hyderabad, Telangana, India. A total of 7,550 serum samples were tested by IIF during the study duration. Sera displaying DFS pattern was tested for anti-DFS antibodies and anti-Extractable Nuclear Antigen (ENA) antibodies by ELISA. A total of 49 patients from rheumatology department satisfying SARD criteria and 184 healthy patients were also tested for anti-DFS antibodies. Results: Anti-DFS 70 antibodies were seen in 0.47%, 16.3%, 39.6% among routine ANA screening referrals, SARD patients and healthy individuals, respectively. DFS 70 antibodies were positive in 60% of DFS IIF positive samples with none of them showing anti-ENA positivity or clinical evidence of SARD. Anti- DFS 70 positivity was more commonly seen in younger patients. Anti-DFS antibodies were significantly more common in healthy individuals compared to SARD patients (p -value=0.0022). Conclusion: It is important to confirm DFS IIF pattern with a specific ELISA as isolated DFS antibodies are frequently associated with non SARD conditions.

Steroid treatment suppresses the CD4+ T-cell response to the third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease patients

Prolonged steroid treatment has a suppressive effect on the immune system, however, its effect on the cellular response to mRNA vaccine is unknown. Here we assessed the impact of prolonged steroid treatment on the T-cell and humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) peptide following the third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease patients. We found that CD4 T-cell response to the S peptide in patients on high-dose long-term steroid treatment showed significantly less S-peptide specific response, compare to low-dose or untreated patients. Remarkably, these results were not reflected in their humoral response, since almost all patients in the cohort had sufficient antibody levels. Moreover, S-peptide activation failed to induce significant mRNA levels of IFNγ and TNFα in patients receiving high-dose steroids. RNA-sequencing datasets analysis implies that steroid treatments' inhibitory effect of nuclear factor kappa-B signaling may interfere with the activation of S-specific CD4 T-cells. This reveals that high-dose steroid treatment inhibits T-cell response to the mRNA vaccine, despite having sufficient antibody levels. Since T-cell immunity is a crucial factor in the immune response to viruses, our findings highlight the need for enhancing the efficiency of vaccines in immune-suppressive patients, by modulation of the T-cell response.

Impaired neutralizing antibodies and preserved cellular immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Reports on vaccine immunogenicity in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) have been inconclusive. Here, we report the immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost with an inactivated vaccine followed by an adenoviral vector vaccine in patients with SARDs using anti-RBD antibodies, neutralizing capacity against Omicron BA.2 [plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT)], T cell phenotypes, and effector cytokine production at 4 weeks after vaccination. SARD patients had lower median (IQR) anti-RBD-IgG levels and neutralizing function against the Omicron BA.2 variant than the healthy group (p = 0.003, p = 0.004, respectively). T cell analysis revealed higher levels of IFN-γ- and TNF-α-secreting CD4 + T cells (p < 0.001, p = 0.0322, respectively) in SARD patients than in the healthy group. Effector cytokine production by CD8 + T cells was consistent with Th responses. These results suggest that this vaccine regimen revealed mildly impaired humoral response while preserving cellular immunogenicity and may be an alternative for individuals for whom mRNA vaccines are contraindicated.

Immunogenicity and safety of the mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases patients.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak has led to the rapid development and administration of the COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data about the immunogenicity and adverse effects of the vaccine on patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) is emerging.AimTo evaluate Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) mRNA-based vaccine second-dose immunogenicity and safety, and the relation between them, in patients with SARDs.MethodsA total of one hundred forty tow adults who received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine were included in the study. The SARDs group included Ninety-nine patients and the control group (forty-three participants) comprised a mixture of healthy participants and patients who were seen at the rheumatology clinic for non-SARDs. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against the Spike protein were evaluated using a SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay. A level of > 150 AU/mL was considered positive. An adverse effects questionnaire was given to the participants upon their first visit to the clinic after their BNT162b2 vaccination.ResultsOf the 142 participants, 116 were seropositive (81.7%) and 26 (18.3%) were seronegative. Of the seronegative participants, 96.2% were SARDs patients. The proportion of seropositivity in the SARDs patients treated with any immunosuppressant was significantly lower (69.9%) compared to the control group and SARDs patients not receiving immunosuppressants (96.8%). A significant negative correlation between seronegativity and treatment with rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone was found in the SARDs group (p = 0.004, 0.044, 0.007 respectively). No fever was observed following the BNT162b2 vaccine in seronegative patients, and the frequency of musculoskeletal adverse effects upon the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was significantly higher in seropositive compared to seronegative patients and in the control group compared to the SARDs patients (p = 0.045, p = 0.02 respectively).ConclusionA decline in the immunogenicity to the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA is seen in patients with SARDs, especially in patients treated with rituximab, MMF, and prednisone. Adverse effects of the vaccine including fever and musculoskeletal symptoms might be a signal for the acquisition of immunity in those patients.Key Points• BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is less immunogenic in SARDs patients compared to the control group.• Rituximab, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil significantly reduced immunogenicity to the vaccine.• There is a correlation between immunogenicity and adverse effects of the vaccine.

Altered Balance of Pro-Inflammatory Immune Cells to T Regulatory Cells Differentiates Symptomatic From Asymptomatic Individuals With Anti-Nuclear Antibodies.

Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (SARDs) are characterized by the production of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs). ANAs are also seen in healthy individuals and can be detected years before disease onset in SARD. Both the immunological changes that promote development of clinical symptoms in SARD and those that prevent autoimmunity in asymptomatic ANA+ individuals (ANA+ NS) remain largely unexplored. To address this question, we used flow cytometry to examine peripheral blood immune populations in ANA+ individuals, with and without SARD, including 20 individuals who subsequently demonstrated symptom progression. Several immune populations were expanded in ANA+ individuals with and without SARD, as compared with ANA- healthy controls, particularly follicular and peripheral T helper, and antibody-producing B cell subsets. In ANA+ NS individuals, there were significant increases in T regulatory subsets and TGF-ß1 that normalized in SARD patients, whereas in SARD patients there were increases in Th2 and Th17 helper cell levels as compared with ANA+ NS individuals, resulting in a shift in the balance between inflammatory and regulatory T cell subsets. Patients with SARD also had increases in the proportion of pro-inflammatory innate immune cell populations, such as CD14+ myeloid dendritic cells, and intermediate and non-classical monocytes, as compared to ANA+ NS individuals. When comparing ANA+ individuals without SARD who progressed clinically over the subsequent 2 years with those who did not, we found that progressors had significantly increased T and B cell activation, as well as increased levels of LAG3+ T regulatory cells and TGF-ß1. Collectively, our findings suggest that active immunoregulation prevents clinical autoimmunity in ANA+ NS and that this becomes impaired in patients who progress to SARD, resulting in an imbalance favoring inflammation.

Prevalence of Findings in Routine Abdominal Ultrasound in Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Their Impact on Therapeutic Decision Making

Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) often receive abdominal ultrasound examinations to screen for organ involvement; yet, the spectrum of findings and their clinical relevance are poorly understood. We conducted a retrospective chart review of inpatients from a rheumatological referral centre with an abdominal ultrasound between 1 January2006 and 31 December 2015, examining 1092 SARD patients with a total of 1695 inpatient stays. The mean age was 55.1 years (range: 17–90 years, SD: 15.8), and the mean disease duration was 6.4 years (range: 0.0–52.8 years, SD: 9.1). A total of 87.5% of the patients were female. The most frequent ultrasound findings were hepatic steatosis (in 26.8% of all patients), splenomegaly (15.2% of all patients), pancreatic lipomatosis (14.3% of all patients) and aortic sclerosis (13.9% of all patients). Based on glucocorticoid and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use, we identified cases where immuno-modulatory medication was escalated; there was an association between therapy escalation and the findings of hepatomegaly and pleural effusion (as tested via Fisher’s exact test). In patients with several examinations during the defined time span (n = 318), we found ultrasound findings to change, especially findings of hepatomegaly, pleural effusion and splenomegaly. When justifying decisions regarding the further treatment of a patient in the discharge letter, abdominal ultrasound results were rarely discussed. Abdominal ultrasound rarely yielded disease-specific or treatment-changing results.

Diagnostic value of monospecifc DFS70 antibodies in systemic utoimmune rheumatic diseases

The detection in serum of monospecifc antibodies that induce a dense fne-speckled fluorescence when interacting with the DFS70 / LEDGF / p75 nuclear antigen is negatively associated with the development of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) and increases the diagnostic specifcity of the screening study of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells (IIF-HEp-2). The results of assessing the clinical signifcance of anti-DFS70 antibodies vary depending on the test systems and the selection of patient groups. The aim of this work is to study the frequency of detection of monospecifc anti-DFS70 antibodies in blood serum in healthy individuals and patients with SARD. Sera of 74 healthy donors and 59 patients with SARD were studied (27 – systemic lupus erythematosus – SLE, 15 – Sjogren's syndrome – SjS, 17 – rheumatoid arthritis – RA). Classical antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-DFS70 antibodies were determined by IIF using a mixture of standard and genetically engineered DFS70-KO HEp-2 cells that do not express DFS70 / LEDGF / p75 as a substrate. 14.9% of healthy donors and 83.1% of SARD patients (96.3% – SLE, 100.0% – SS, 47.1% – RA) were seropositive for antinuclear factor (ANF). Classical ANA with homogeneous, speckled, nucleolar, cytoplasmic, mixed types of fluorescence and the absence of anti-DFS70 antibodies were found in all ANF-positive patients with SARD and in 8.1% of healthy donors. Monospecifc anti-DFS70 antibodies without classical ANA were detected in 6.8% of healthy individuals and were absent in SARS. Among ANF-positive healthy donors, the frequency of isolated detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies was 45.5%. The detection of monospecifc anti-DFS70 antibodies can be considered as a potential predictive marker for excluding the diagnosis of SARD in ANF-positive patients with no or unclear clinical signs of these diseases.

Serological abnormalities that predict progression to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in antinuclear antibody-positive individuals.

We investigated the autoantibody (autoAb) profiles in ANA+ individuals lacking systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) and early SARD patients to determine the key differences between these groups and identify factors that are associated with an increased risk of symptomatic progression within the next 2 years in ANA+ individuals. Using custom antigen (Ag) microarrays, 144 IgM and IgG autoAbs were surveyed in 84 asymptomatic and 123 symptomatic (48 UCTD and 75 SARD patients) ANA+ individuals. AutoAbs were compared in ANA+ individuals lacking a SARD diagnosis with ≥2 years follow-up (n = 52), including all those who demonstrated progression (n = 14) during this period, with changes over time assessed in a representative subset. We show that ANA+ individuals have autoAb to many self-Ags that are not being captured by current screening techniques and very high levels of these autoAbs are predominantly restricted to early SARD patients, with SLE patients displaying reactivity to many more autoAgs than the other groups. In general, the symptoms that developed in progressors mirrored those seen in SARD patients with similar patterns of autoAbs. Only anti-Ro52 Abs were found to predict progression (positive predictive value 46%, negative predictive value 89%). Surprisingly, over 2 years of follow-up the levels of autoAbs remained remarkably stable regardless of whether individuals progressed or not. Our findings strongly argue that development of assays with an expanded set of auto-Ags and enhanced dynamic range would improve the diagnostic and prognostic ability of autoAb testing.

Adiponectin Deregulation in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

Deregulation of adiponectin is found in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Its expression is downregulated by various inflammatory mediators, but paradoxically, elevated serum levels are present in SARDs with high inflammatory components, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Circulating adiponectin is positively associated with radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis as well as with cardiovascular risks and lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. However, in SARDs with less prominent inflammation, such as systemic sclerosis, adiponectin levels are low and correlate negatively with disease activity. Regulators of adiponectin gene expression (PPAR-γ, Id3, ATF3, and SIRT1) and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor α) are differentially expressed in SARDs and could therefore influence total adiponectin levels. In addition, anti-inflammatory therapy could also have an impact, as tocilizumab treatment is associated with increased serum adiponectin. However, anti-tumor necrosis factor α treatment does not seem to affect its levels. Our review provides an overview of studies on adiponectin levels in the bloodstream and other biological samples from SARD patients and presents some possible explanations why adiponectin is deregulated in the context of therapy and gene regulation.

Is cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia needed in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapies?

The incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased over recent years in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). PJP prognosis is poor in those receiving immunosuppressive therapy and glucocorticoids in particular. Despite the effectiveness of cotrimoxazole against PJP, the risk of adverse effects remains significant, and no consensus has emerged regarding the need for PJP prophylaxis in SARD patients undergoing immunosuppressor therapies.Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP in SARD adult patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: We performed a systematic review, consulting MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2020. Outcomes covered prevention of PJP, other infections, morbidity, mortality, and safety. The information obtained was summarized with a narrative review and results were tabulated. Of the 318 identified references, 8 were included. Two were randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The quality of studies was moderate or low. Despite disparities in the cotrimoxazole prophylaxis regimens described, results were consistent in terms of efficacy, particularly with glucocorticoid doses > 20mg/day. However, cotrimoxazole 400mg/80mg/day, prescribed three times/ week, or 200mg/40mg/day or in dose escalation, exhibited similar positive performances. Conversely, cotrimoxazole 400mg/80mg/day showed higher incidences of withdrawals and adverse effects. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP exhibited efficacy in SARD, mainly in patients taking glucocorticoids ≥ 20mg/day. All cotrimoxazole regimens exposed seemed equally efficacious, although, higher quality trials are needed. Adverse effects were observed 2 months after initiation, particularly with the 400mg/80mg/day regimen. Conversely, escalation dosing or 200mg/40mg/day regimens appeared better tolerated.

COVID-19 and shielding: experiences of UK patients with lupus and related diseases.

ObjectiveThe shielding guidance in the UK for the clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) commenced on 23 March 2020 in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of the pandemic and shielding on patients with lupus and related systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).MethodsThis was a mixed-methods cohort study (n = 111) including pre-lockdown baseline surveys (March 2020), follow-up surveys (June 2020) and in-depth interviews during July 2020 (n = 25).ResultsMost participants had a high level of anxiety regarding their mortality risk from COVID-19 and supported the concept of shielding. Shielding allocations and communications were perceived as inconsistently applied and delivered. More than half of those not classified as CEV reported feeling abandoned, at increased risk and with no support. Shielding communications increased feelings of being ‘cared about’, but also increased fear, and the ‘vulnerable’ labelling was perceived by some to damage social and self-identity. More than 80% of those classified as CEV stated that the classification and subsequent communications had changed their social-mixing behaviour. Despite many negative impacts of COVID-19 and shielding/lockdown being identified, including isolation, fear and reduced medical care, the quantitative data during the pandemic showed increases in most measures of wellbeing (which was low at both time points) from pre-lockdown, including reductions in the impact of fatigue and pain (P-values < 0.001).ConclusionShielding classifications and communications were, in general, viewed positively, although they were perceived as inconsistently delivered and anxiety-provoking by some participants. More frequent positively framed communication and wellbeing support could benefit all SARD patients. Slower-paced lockdown lifestyles might confer health/wellbeing benefits for some people with chronic diseases.

Anti-DFS70 Antibodies Among Patient and Healthy Population Cohorts in China: Results From a Multicenter Training Program Showing Spontaneous Abortion and Pediatric Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Are Common in Anti-DFS70 Positive Patients.

ObjectiveAnti-DFS70 antibodies correlating with the nuclear dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern in the HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) are less common in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) than in healthy subjects and their clinical associations remain elusive. We hosted a multi-center HEp-2 IFA training program to improve the ability of clinical laboratories to recognize the DFS pattern and to investigate the prevalence and relevance of anti-DFS70 antibodies.MethodsDFS pattern sera identified by HEp-2 IFA in 29 centers in China were redirected to a central laboratory for anti-DFS70 testing by line immunoblot assay (LIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and IFA with HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70-KO substrate. Anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies were measured by LIA and the clinical relevance was examined in adult and pediatric patients.ResultsHEp-2 IFA positive rate and DFS pattern in positive sera were 36.2% (34,417/95,131) and 1.7% (582/34,417) in the patient cohort, and 10.0% (423/4,234) and 7.8% (33/423) in a healthy population, respectively. Anti-DFS70 prevalence among sera presenting the DFS pattern was 96.0, 93.7, and 49.6% by ELISA, LIA, and HEp-2 ELITE, respectively. 15.5% (52/336) of adult and 50.0% (20/40) of pediatric anti-DFS70 positive patients were diagnosed with SARD. Diseases most common in anti-DFS70 positive patients were spontaneous abortion (28.0%) in adults and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (22.5%) in pediatric patients.ConclusionAccurate DFS pattern identification increased the detection rate of anti-DFS70 antibodies by ELISA and LIA. Anti-DFS70 antibodies are remarkably high in cases of spontaneous abortion and in pediatric SARD patients, but not prevalent in adult SARD patients.