Systematic Reviews And Meta-analyses Research Articles

Evidence-Based Critical Assessment of the Success Rate of Dental Implants in Smokers: An Umbrella Systematic Review.

The aim of this umbrella systematic review is to evaluate the success rate and osseointegration of dental implants in patients with a smoking habit. Electronic database searches of PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost were done from 2006 until August 2024, using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) investigating the association between smoking and the rate of success of dental implants based on dental implant failure, marginal bone loss, survival, and peri-implant parameters were deemed eligible. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Tool 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included SRMAs. Seventeen systematic reviews have been included. In the reviews, 10 studies included meta-analyses (MAs) that evaluated implant failure rate and marginal bone loss. According to the AMSTAR 2 checklist, one review was scored "high," seven reviews were scored "moderate," seven reviews were scored "low," and two reviews were scored "critically low" quality. The strength of evidence suggests a low level of success and high rate of failure of osseointegration of dental implants in smokers. However, the influence of smoking on the rate of dental implant failure seems to be associated with various factors such as peri-implant inflammatory markers, post-operative infections, etc. Inherently, the conclusion of this review is based on a limited number of systematic reviews.

Scientific evidence of acupuncture for post-stroke motor impairment: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

IntroductionSeveral systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of clinical trials showed the efficacy of acupuncture for post-stroke motor impairment. To systematically estimate and synthesise these results, we aimed to conduct an...

Cutting-Edge Methodological Guidance for Authors in Conducting the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The landscape of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) in biomedicine has expanded exponentially, driven by the growing demand for evidence-based healthcare decision-making. However, the rapid increase of SRMAs has often outpaced the development of rigorous methodological standards, resulting in variability in quality and potentially limiting their effectiveness in informing healthcare practices. This gap highlights the critical need for advanced methodological guidance to enhance the quality and impact of SRMAs. Our contribution aims to provide comprehensive methodological direction for authors to conduct robust SRMAs. By effectively integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence, SRMAs can address complex healthcare questions more thoroughly than traditional reviews. Furthermore, these step-by-step guidelines will help researchers to address the challenges of synthesizing diverse types of evidence, thereby improving the rigor, relevance, and applicability of their findings in healthcare decision-making processes.

The Use of Whole-Body Vibration, Electrical Stimulation, and Magnetic Stimulation in Muscle Dystrophy Patients: A Scoping Review.

The purpose of this scoping review was to report the effects of vibration therapy, electrical stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation on patients with muscle dystrophies. The outcome measures were muscle strength, body composition, balance, and functional mobility of these patients.We used the PreferredReportingItemsfor Systematic reviews andMeta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. The literature review was conducted on PubMed. We included studies that were written in English, were peer-reviewed, without regard to the publication date, and implemented a form of "vibration therapy" or "electrical stimulation" or "magnetic stimulation" as an intervention program of any duration. Overall, 14 studies were retrieved. Most of the studies applied whole-body vibration (WBV) therapy or electrical stimulation and only one was found that implemented transcranial magnetic stimulation. The interventions were reported but there was a variety in duration or the frequency of the program, as well as in the disease progression of the patients.It seems that WBV, electrical stimulation, and magnetic stimulation have positive outcomes, but these vary depending on the muscle deficits and limitations of the patients with muscle dystrophy. It is recommended that future studies should be conducted in order to determine the ideal prescription of each intervention, so as to be as beneficial as possible.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery part I: interpreting and critically appraising as a guide for clinical practice.

Neurosurgeons are inundated with the Herculean task to keep abreast with the rapid pace at which clinical research is proliferating. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) have consequently surged in popularity because when executed properly, they constitute the highest level of evidence, and may save busy neurosurgeons many hours of combing the literature. Well-executed SRMAs may prove instructive for clinical practice, but poorly conducted reviews sow confusion and may potentially cause harm. Unfortunately, many SRMAs within neurosurgery are relatively lackluster in methodological rigor. When neurosurgeons apply the results of an SRMA to patient care, they should start by evaluating the extent to which the employed methods have likely protected against misleading results. The present article aims to educate the reader about how to interpret an SRMA, to assess the potential relevance of its results in the special context of the neurosurgical patient population.

Reliability of the evidence to guide decision-making in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with acupuncture: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

BackgroundGrowing numbers of randomized clinical trials-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) have been conducted to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An overview of SRs/MAs will be conducted with the aim of systematically compiling, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence regarding acupuncture for GERD.MethodsSRs/MAs of acupuncture on GERD will be searched in eight databases. Two independent reviewers will conduct the literature search, data extraction, and review quality assessment. Utilizing the AMSTAR-2 tool, PRISMA checklists, and GRADE system, respectively, the methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality will be evaluated. In relation to the subject and the overview’s objects, the results will be given. This study will aid in identifying gaps between evidence and its clinical application and serve as a roadmap for further high-quality research.DiscussionThe results of the overview will aid in closing the gap between clinical evidence and its use in clinical practice. This study will identify significant faults in the use of evidence, point out areas where methodology needs to be improved, and provide guidance for future high-quality research.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022371850.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not necessary because no personal information about individuals is collected. A peer-reviewed journal or pertinent conferences will publish the results, whichever comes first.

Sperm DNA fragmentation and infertility: a narrative review.

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a practical understanding of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in the management of male infertility. A search for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) on SDF between April 1st, 2018 and April 1st, 2023 was performed using PubMed and articles were selected as per their relevance to the topic. Guidelines from major societies were also reviewed. Three clinical cases are reported and discussed. The search initially identified 80 articles. We selected 13 SRMAs based on their relevance to the topic. Of the 13 SRMAs, 7 evaluated the effect of SDF on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes and recurrent pregnancy loss, 3 studied the effect of varicocele repair on SDF, and 3 evaluated the role of SDF involving lifestyle and environmental health factors including body mass index and male factor treatment strategies. Evidence suggests that increased SDF has a negative impact on natural pregnancy and ART outcomes. SDF testing may be particularly important in the infertility evaluation of men with varicoceles, idiopathic or unexplained infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or previous ART failure. Further studies are needed on SDF testing and the implications it can have on male factor infertility and pregnancy outcomes as well as its implementation in the setting of ART.

P-061 Effect of Varicocelectomy on fertility potential and pregnancy outcome: results of a large cohort from a tertiary medical center

Abstract Study question Does varicocelectomy improve semen parameters, hormones & pregnancy outcomes in infertile men with clinical varicocele? Summary answer In infertile men with clinical varicocele, sperm count, motility, and DNA fragmentation improved significantly after varicocelectomy. Pregnancy outcomes improved for both spontaneous and assisted reproduction. What is known already Infertility is estimated to impact 15% of couples attempting to conceive worldwide. Varicocele has been identified as the most common surgically correctable cause of male infertility. Despite the significant role of varicocele in the pathogenesis of male infertility, the impact of varicocele repair (VR) on conventional semen parameters & pregnancy outcomes remains controversial. Few systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) evaluated the impact of VR on sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility, mostly using a before-after analytic approach with fewer studies reporting on pregnancy outcomes. Study design, size, duration This was a retrospective study of 2171 patients presenting with infertility & clinical varicocele between 2014 and 2024. Participants/materials, setting, methods Exclusion criteria were prior medications, medical illnesses causing infertility, or endocrine disorders. All participants underwent sub-inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy. Data regarding patient demographics, clinical findings, semen analysis, serum hormone levels & pregnancy outcomes were collected pre and post-operatively. Variables were examined before & after varicocelectomy. X2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze categorical and numerical values, respectively. A p value < 0.05 was considered statically significant. Main results and the role of chance A 2171 participants were included. The mean age ± SD of the study population was 33.65 ± 8.54 years. Their mean right testicular size, left testicular size, right vein size, and left vein size were 14.38 ± 4.56,13.46 ± 3.49, 2.47±0.79 & 3.99 ±1.33 respectively. When subdividing them by grade of varicocele, on the right side, grades 1, 2, and 3 were detected in 692 (31.9%), 491 (22.6%), and 63 (2.9%), respectively. While on the left side, grades 1, 2, and 3 varicoceles were detected in 303 (13.9%), 999 (46%) & 867 (39.9%), respectively. Indication for surgery was pain (37%, primary infertility (42.9%), secondary infertility (18.3%), and others (3.6%). The majority performed unilateral varicocelectomy (1776 {81.8%}), while 396 (18.2%) underwent bilateral varicocelectomy. Varicocelectomy significantly improved sperm count, total & progressive motility & DNA fragmentation. Pregnancy outcomes improved postoperatively for both spontaneous (32.3%) & assisted reproduction (25.2%). No significant change was found in hormones postoperatively. Limitations, reasons for caution Retrospective study, single center experience. Wider implications of the findings It is important in patients’ counselling & choose the best management for this group of patients. Trial registration number NA

Unveiling Promising Modalities and Enhancing Patient Outcomes in Graves' Disease Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune condition of the thyroid. The hyperthyroidism manifested by patients affected by this disease is caused by the production of autoantibodies against the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, or thyrotropin) receptor (TSHR), which mimic the effects of the hormone on thyroid cells, thereby stimulating autonomic production of thyroxine and triiodothyronine. Deciding on a therapeutic approach to this condition presents intricate dilemmas for both clinicians and patients. Each of the three available treatment modalities is grounded in evidence-based medicine, affirming its efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of carbimazole (CBM), radioactive iodine (RAI), and surgery in treating GD and provide evidence-based recommendations for healthcare providers regarding the optimal management of the condition based on a comprehensive analysis of effectiveness, safety, patient satisfaction, and recovery outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews andMeta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We used the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to conduct a thorough web search for articles published between January 2019 and September 2023. The meta-analysis was carried out using Resource Manager (Revman) 5.4.1. The study found that propylthiouracil (PTU) ormethimazole/carbimazole (MMI/CBM) treatment increases the risk of hyperlipidemia in patients with hyperthyroidism. Once in a euthyroid state, glucose tolerance increases; for children with GD, a computer model for customized dosing has been created. To sum up, CBM, surgery, and RAI are all useful treatment options for GD. Using steroids in conjunction with radiation therapy may help prevent Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO).

Brain Tissue Oxygenation Guided Therapy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AbstractThe present umbrella review aims to summarize the evidence of the efficacy and benefit of combined brain tissue oxygen monitoring and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring compared with ICP monitoring based therapy alone. In this study, we systematically searched five databases to retrieve systematic reviews (SRs) regarding the efficacy of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This overview was prepared following the guidelines established by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for umbrella reviews. No restrictions were placed on the date, language, or country of publication. Three SRs and meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria for the study. The SRs and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Specifically, two SRs were rated as high quality by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), while one was rated as moderate quality. Two of the SR-MAs reported on the mortality outcome, with two reporting on the functional outcome and one reporting on the length of hospital stay outcome. One of the SRs indicated that using combined brain tissue oxygen monitoring led to a reduction in mortality. Two of the SRs had mixed results. Two articles found that hospital length tends to be shorter with combined therapy than with ICP monitoring-based therapy alone. Our observations suggested that brain tissue oxygen combined with ICP/cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) guided therapy provides a favorable outcome in TBI patients than standard ICP-/CPP-guided therapy. The combined therapy has little effect on mortality rate, ICP, CPP, and length of stay.

Management Strategies for Immature Teeth with Pulp Necrosis: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

This review evaluates the effectiveness of treatment modalities for immature teeth with pulp necrosis, focusing on calcium hydroxide (CH) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apexification, as well as regenerative endodontic treatments (RETs). Recent advancements and clinical outcomes are highlighted. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and grey literature was conducted from inception to July 2024. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MAs) assessing apexification and RET outcomes in immature teeth with pulp necrosis were included. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, and data on study design, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool. 31 SR/MAs were included. The quality ranged from critically low to low, except one rated as high. MTA apexification was more effective than CH for faster apical barrier formation, though overall success rates were similar. MTA is preferred for its efficiency, but standardized protocols are needed, and tooth discoloration was noted as a potential complication. RET generally outperforms apexification in root maturation, with platelet concentrates like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) showing promising results; PRP was associated with greater root length, while PRF showed superior apical healing. Variability in RET outcomes was noted due to the lack of standardized protocols. Comparative studies of RET versus apexification showed no significant differences in survival or overall success rates. RET often provides better apical closure and root development, though results vary. Both approaches are viable, but more research with standardized protocols and larger samples is needed to establish definitive clinical advantages. MTA apexification and RET are viable alternatives to CH apexification, with RET showing greater potential for root development and apical healing. Future research should focus on developing standardized protocols and uniform RET guidelines, and evaluating long-term outcomes to establish efficacy and safety.

Changes in sexual activities and risky sexual behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Several studies reported changes in sexual activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a lack of comprehensive systematic reviews in this field. We aimed to systematically review the changes in sexual activities and risky sexual behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist to improve transparency of our study. The results indicated a considerable decline in the frequency of sexual intercourse, particularly in singles and people with casual dating. Factors associated with sexual activity during the COVID-19 restrictions were depression, stress, lack of intimacy, inability to leave home, work schedule shifting, poor privacy, fear of COVID-19, lack of nightlife, and university educational level. Considering different groups of the population concerning their sexual behaviors is a necessary step in approaching healthy sexual behavior strategies, through which the adverse effects of a pandemic are minimized.

Efficacy of stem cell therapy for diabetic foot: Clinical evidence from meta-analyses.

To assess the clinical data on the effectiveness of stem cell therapy for diabetic foot (DF) based on recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs). SRs/MAs that evaluate the clinical evidence on the efficacy of stem cell therapy for DF were identified through a systematic search in public databases. The methodological quality and evidence quality of the included SRs/MAs were assessed separately by two researchers. Eight SRs/MAs were included in this analysis. Since there were no registered protocol or exclusion criteria for the included SRs/MAs, the methodological quality was rated as critically low. There was no high-quality evidence available for the outcomes, and the evidence quality ranged from critically low to moderate. Evidence degradation was most commonly caused by the risk of bias, followed by imprecision, publication bias and inconsistency. In conclusion, stem cell therapy may be effective for DF. However, this conclusion should be approached with caution, considering the quality of the supporting SRs/MAs.

Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993-2018.

The PRISMA guidelines were published in 2009 to address inadequate reporting of key methodological details in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs). This study sought to assess the impact of PRISMA on the quality of reporting in the full text of dental medicine journals. This study assessed the impact of PRISMA (2009) on thirteen methodological details in SRs/MAs published in the highest-impact dental medicine journals between 1993-2009 (n = 211) and 2012-2018 (n = 618). The study further examined the rate of described use of PRISMA in the abstract or full text of included studies published post- PRISMA and the impact of described use of PRISMA on level of reporting. This study also examined potential effects of inclusion of PRISMA in Instructions for Authors, along with study team characteristics. The number of items reported in SRs/MAs increased following the publication of PRISMA (pre-PRISMA: M = 7.83, SD = 3.267; post-PRISMA: M = 10.55, SD = 1.4). Post-PRISMA, authors rarely mention PRISMA in abstracts (8.9%) and describe the use of PRISMA in the full text in 59.87% of SRs/MAs. The described use of PRISMA within the full text indicates that its intent (guidance for reporting) is not well understood, with over a third of SRs/MAs (35.6%) describing PRISMA as guiding the conduct of the review. However, any described use of PRISMA was associated with improved reporting. Among author team characteristics examined, only author team size had a positive relationship with improved reporting. Following the 2009 publication of PRISMA, the level of reporting of key methodological details improved for systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in the highest-impact dental medicine journals. The positive relationship between reference to PRISMA in the full text and level of reporting provides further evidence of the impact of PRISMA on improving transparent reporting in dental medicine SRs/MAs.

Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

This umbrella review focused on evaluating the efficacy and adverse events of the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients receiving any treatment regimens, including ADT alone or combination treatments. This study conducted an umbrella review following the PRISMA 2020 checklist, aiming to summarize the available studies to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. A literature search was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) that included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2023. This study summarized their findings, evaluated overlapping data (i.e., the same RCTs were included in >one SRMA), tested for excessive significance (i.e., observed number of statistically significant studies > expected number by chance) and assessed the quality of the studies. A total of 4191 studies were identified, but only 27 were included. Among those 27 studies, 12 were network meta-analyses and 15 were direct meta-analyses. Most studies showed no statistically significant difference in overall mortality among GnRH agonists, antagonists and bilateral orchiectomy. Combination treatment is more beneficial than ADT alone in both OS and PFS outcomes with more adverse events. Nevertheless, there is no OS advantage of any combination regimen over the others. Combination treatments demonstrated clear benefits in OS and PFS over ADT alone with more AEs. Further studies are needed to compare among combination treatments.

Acupuncture for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: an overview of systematic reviews.

To evaluate the report quality, methodological quality and evidence quality of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of acupuncture for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The SRs/MAs of acupuncture for IVF-ET were searched electronically from databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, from inception of each database to September 27th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. Using PRISMA statement, the AMSTAR 2 scale and the GRADE system, the report quality, methodological quality and evidence quality of the included SRs/MAs were assessed. A total of 28 SRs/MAs were included, with PRISMA scores ranging from 8.5 points to 27 points. The problems of report quality focused on protocol and registration, retrieval, risk of bias in studies, additional analysis, limitations and funding. The methodological quality of included studies was generally low, reflecting on items 2, 3, 7, 10, 12 and 16. A total of 85 outcome indexes were included in the GRADE system for evidence grade evaluation. Most of the evidences were low or very low in quality. The reasons for the downgrade were related to study limitations, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias. Acupuncture therapy improves the outcomes of IVF-ET, but the methodological quality and evidence quality of related SRs/MAs are low. It is recommended to conduct more high-quality studies in the future to provide more reliable evidences.

Saturated fat, the estimated absolute risk and certainty of risk for mortality and major cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of reducing saturated fat or fatty foods, or replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat, carbohydrate or protein, on the risk of mortality and major cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes in adults.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and references of included studies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in adults published in the past 10 years. Eligible reviews investigated reducing saturated fat or fatty foods or replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat, carbohydrate or protein, on the risk of cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes and assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using, for example, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach. We assessed the quality of SRMAs using a modified version of AMSTAR-2. Results were summarized as absolute estimates of effect together with the certainty of effects using a narrative synthesis approach.ResultsWe included 17 SRMAs (13 reviews of observational studies with follow-up 1 to 34 years; 4 reviews of RCTs with follow-up 1 to 17 years). The quality of two-thirds of the SRMAs was critically low to moderate; the main limitations included deficient reporting of study selection, absolute effect estimates, sources of funding, and a priori subgroups to explore heterogeneity. Our included reviews reported > 100 estimates of effect across 11 critically important cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes. High quality SRMAs consistently and predominantly reported low to very low certainty evidence that reducing or replacing saturated fat was associated with a very small risk reduction in cancer and cardiometabolic endpoints. The risk reductions where approximately divided, some being statistically significant and some being not statistically significant. However, based on 2 moderate to high quality reviews, we found moderate certainty evidence for a small but important effect that was statistically significant for two outcomes (total mortality events [20 fewer events per 1000 followed] and combined cardiovascular events [16 fewer per 1000 followed]). Conversely, 4 moderate to high quality reviews showed very small effects on total mortality, with 3 of these reviews showing non-statistically significant mortality effects.ConclusionSystematic reviews investigating the impact of SFA on mortality and major cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes almost universally suggest very small absolute changes in risk, and the data is based primarily on low and very low certainty evidence.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42020172141

Systematic review and meta-analysis use in the field of spinal cord injury research: A bibliometric analysis

Objective To subvert issues of low sample sizes and high attrition rates and generate epidemiologically-sound evidence, collaborative research—through international consortia and multi-centric studies—and meta-analysis approaches are encouraged in spinal cord injury (SCI) research. We investigated the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) methodology in SCI research and evaluated the quality of evidence across publications we identified. Methods We searched the Web of Science Core Collection database by topic without time or language restrictions through 16 December 2022. We identified additional relevant articles through Embase.com. SRMA including human and animal SCI populations were eligible for inclusion. We analyzed data using Bibliometrix and VOSviewer. We used the JBI tool (former Joanna Briggs Institute) to assess methodological quality of a subset of 50 randomly selected articles. Results We based our analysis on data from 1'224 documents authored by 5'237 scholars and published in 424 sources between 1985 and 2022. The use of SRMA methodology in the field gained momentum in 2009 and a steady increase followed with an annual growth rate of ≈15%. Our findings indicate major research themes in the field include recovery, SCI management, rehabilitation, and quality of life. Over the past 30 years there has been a shift from SRMA concerning functional recovery, secondary health complications, and quality of life toward biomarkers and neuro-regeneration. The major methodological issues across articles we evaluated included opaquely described search strategies, poorly reported critical appraisals, and insufficiently addressing publication bias. In addition, only one-fifth of articles reported review protocol registration. Conclusions : Our bibliometric analysis clearly shows a rapid increase of SRMA applications in SCI research. We discuss the most important methodological concerns we identified among a randomly selected set of articles and provide guidance for improving adherence to methodological and reporting SRMA guidelines.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on androgen administration in humans: an umbrella review.

The present umbrella review systematically searches and synthesizes recent (2021-2023) systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) on androgen administration in humans. Results from 19 SRMA are synthesized. Four themes were identified: market for androgens, prevalence of androgen abuse, psychological effects of androgens, and clinical/therapeutic effects of androgens. One of three androgens on the illicit market are fake or substandard. Whereas one of three androgen users experiences dependence and various serious disorders, only one of three androgen users seek physician support. Additionally, androgen administration increases self-reported aggression in healthy male individuals, and abuse positively correlates with interpersonal violence. Furthermore, androgen therapy is beneficial in treating persons suffering from various chronic diseases. In this umbrella review, we identified 19 SRMA on androgen use and abuse. Results show a high prevalence of fake androgens on the illicit market, a high prevalence of androgen abuse and dependence, and that a huge proportion of androgen users tend to avoid seeking support from clinicians. Also, androgen administration increases self-reported aggression among healthy male individuals, and there is a positive correlation between androgen abuse and violent behaviors. Finally, androgens have multiple therapeutic effects on various pathology.

Tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure: a systematic review

ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review is to collect, appraise, and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the effectiveness of tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, Cochrane reviews for SRs/Mas published between the databases’ establishment to November 17, 2021. All the records were managed with Endnote 20. Standardized forms were used to extract data. Revman 5.3 was used to make forest plots to show the characteristics of outcomes. The methodological and evidence quality were respectively evaluated by AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendation of Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.ResultsA total of 9 SRs/Mas between 2015 to 2020 met inclusion criteria. Serum sodium concentration and urine output were considered as primary outcomes and body weight change and all-cause mortality as second outcomes. Through conducting forest plots, it appeared that tolvaptan brought more positive effect than conventional therapies. It was pessimistic when it comes to the quality of the 9 studies. all the 9 articles were rated as low-quality because AMSTAR 2 evaluation showed that they each had at least one critical item (items 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15) defect. Besides, every article had a few non-critical item defects too. The result of GRADE assessment was not optimistic, so the overall quality of the evidences was low as well.ConclusionTolvaptan can be recommended for water retention in HF patients, but more evidence is needed.