Systematic Review Of Self-management Interventions Research Articles

Abstract P365: Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions for Black Women With Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among Black women, and when compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts, they are about 50% more likely to have uncontrolled high blood pressure (BP). The disproportionate burden of CVD in Black women highlights the need for CVD prevention programs in this population. The present systematic literature review assessed the efficacy of self-management interventions for Black women with CVD risk factors. Hypothesis: Self-management interventions that target more than one health practice, when administered to Black women with CVD risk factors, will decrease CVD risk and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: Searches were run on PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases based on the following inclusion criteria: papers written from September 22, 2018; English language; US studies only; original research reports; prospective clinical trials; cardiovascular health promotion/self-management interventions that target at least two health practices (individual or group, in-person or remotely delivered, or person-person synchronous); primary prevention; comorbid conditions without a cardiovascular event; at least one patient level outcome (self-reported or biological); Black women at least 18 years of age only. Data extraction included participant demographics; intervention characteristics; self-management/health behavior domains; research design; and study outcomes. Results: Of the 1041 abstracts screened (262 duplicates removed), 87 full-text articles were screened, and 11 papers from 10 unique trials (N= 1,635) were chosen for inclusion. Intervention durations ranged from 5-weeks to 12-months, with a frequency of intervention dose ranging from daily contact to bi-weekly meetings. Of the 10 unique trials, the majority targeted physical activity (n=8), nutrition (n=5), weight loss (n=3), health knowledge (n=2), and BP control (n=2). Interventions were mostly offered in groups (n=9), and some included individual components (n=2). Nine of the eleven papers reported statistically significant improvements in CVD risk factors including weight loss (n=6), physical activity (n=2), BP control (n=2), waist circumference (n=1), and depression (n=1). Few papers (N=1) addressed mental health, and none addressed other social determinants of health. Conclusions: Evidence to date indicates that self-management interventions are not only feasible but also appear to improve CVD risk factors and clinical outcomes in Black women with CVD risk. Future research should assess best practices for the implementation of culturally informed CVD risk prevention programs in underserved populations. Further intervention development should focus on the influence that social determinants of health such as discrimination, stress, and mental health may have on self-management and CVD risk in this population.

Intervention components in the self-management of Parkinson’s: a mixed-methods synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence

IntroductionSelf-management interventions consist of multiple components to support people in the management of medical, emotional, and behavioural aspects of their condition, and aim to improve quality of life, function, and other outcomes. A systematic review of self-management interventions in Parkinson’s showed no conclusive evidence for effectiveness of specific self-management approaches in Parkinson’s to date but identified several potentially useful components.AimTo identify the key required components for self-management in people with Parkinson’s by synthesising evidence from a body of primary qualitative evidence and systematic reviews, and to explore which of these key components should be incorporated into trials of self-management in Parkinson’s.MethodA mixed-methods synthesis was conducted. We combined data from two primary qualitative studies and a systematic review of qualitative studies that focused on self-management in Parkinson’s to identify key intervention components. These were then mapped onto the results of a systematic review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) using matrices. First, data were extracted from the qualitative studies with people with Parkinson’s and healthcare professionals on the key self-management components in this population. Second, a matrix table was created to map the identified Parkinson’s specific self-management components against potential effectiveness from published RCTs of self-management interventions.ResultsSynthesis of qualitative data identified 15 potential self-management components. These 15 components included components needed to start self-managing (e.g., information, skill acquirement) and components needed to maintain self-managing (e.g., self-motoring, increasing motivation). From 18 RCTs, interventions varied in how many components were included (range 1–10). Trials reporting significant beneficial effects of their intervention included a higher number of components (4 or more self-management components) than trials without significant findings (1–3 self-management components).ConclusionFifteen key self-management components were identified that should be incorporated into interventions or programs of self-management in Parkinson’s. No current trial has incorporated all aspects, but a higher number of these key components appears to make trials of self-management interventions more likely to be successful.

A Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions Conducted Across Global Settings for Depressive Symptoms in Persons with HIV.

Depressive symptoms can affect health outcomes in people living with HIV (PLWH) including adherence to treatment and disease prognosis. Self-management interventions targeting depressive symptoms have been effective in preventing these negative sequelae of depressive symptoms. The processes of self-management include learning skills related to living with the illness needs, accessing resources to manage the illness, and coping with the illness. A systematic literature review was conducted to appraise and synthesize the current evidence of self-management interventions targeting depressive symptoms in PLWH. Following the PRISMA guidelines, an electronic search of 4 databases was conducted. Original studies written in English that used a randomized controlled trial design to test the effect of self-management intervention on depressive symptoms were included. Studies were selected that were published on/before April 19, 2022, thus yielding 13 relevant articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies and narrative synthesis was used to synthesize the results. 40 to 755 participants were included in the studies, with each using various measures to assess depressive symptoms pre-and post-intervention, and timepoints for assessing depressive symptoms post-intervention varied. While 12 studies showed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms post-intervention, only 4 studies that used individual coaching or technology showed lower depressive symptoms in intervention groups in comparison to the control groups. This review can be used to inform scale-up and dissemination of these interventions to improve depressive symptoms in PLWH.

Systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer.

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer and to determine the effective components of said interventions. We conducted a systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults (65+) with cancer guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. We conducted an exhaustive search of the following databases: Ageline, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. We assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Down & Black for quasi-experimental studies, with data synthesized in a narrative and tabular format. Sixteen thousand nine hundred and eight-five titles and abstracts were screened, subsequently 452 full-text papers were reviewed by two independent reviewers, of which 13 full-text papers were included in the final review. All self-management interventions included in this review measured Quality of Life; other outcomes included mood, self-care activity, supportive care needs, self-advocacy, pain intensity, and analgesic intake; only one intervention measured frailty. Effective interventions were delivered by a multidisciplinary teams (n=4), nurses (n=3), and mental health professionals (n=1). Self-management core skills most commonly targeted included: problem solving; behavioural self-monitoring and tailoring; and settings goals and action planning. Global calls to action argue for increased emphasize on self-management but presently, few interventions exist that explicitly target the self-management needs of older adults with cancer. Future work should focus on explicit pathways to support older adults and their caregivers to prepare for and engage in cancer self-management processes and behaviours.

Ways Ahead: developing a supported self-management programme for people living with low- and intermediate-grade gliomas - a protocol for a multi-method study

IntroductionLiving with and beyond a diagnosis of a low- and intermediate-grade glioma (LIGG) can adversely impact many aspects of people’s lives and their quality of life (QoL). In people with...

Protocol for a systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults living with cancer

BackgroundCancer predominates in adults over age 65. Cancer treatments are known to create physical and psychosocial challenges, which may be amplified for older adults with cancer.Learning and applying self-management behaviours and skills during treatment with cancer can help to manage/recover health and improve quality of life. In many other chronic illnesses, self-management interventions are known to improve health outcomes and lower healthcare costs. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer on physical, psychosocial, and health system-related outcomes.MethodsWe are conducting a systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults (65+) diagnosed with cancer (solid tumour or haematological) in the active treatment phase of cancer. This systematic review is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies are limited to experimental or quasi-experimental methods published in English, French, German, or Dutch. A search strategy was designed with a Health Sciences librarian and performed using the following electronic databases: Ageline, AMED, ASSIA, Cinahl, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Sociological s. Approximately 14,000 titles and abstracts are being electronically screened by a minimum of 2 reviewers, with relevant studies to be screened for full text. The final sample of included studies will be assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Down and Black for quasi-experimental studies, with data synthesized in a narrative and tabular format.DiscussionThis systematic review will expand the knowledge base of interventions supporting self-management for older adults with cancer. This study will inform future intervention development by identifying gaps and strengths in effective self-management interventions targeting the needs of older adults receiving active treatment for cancer.Systematic review registrationPROPERO registry ID# CRD42019134113

Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: A systematic review and evaluation of intervention content and theories.

Self-management has been proposed as a strategy to help cancer patients optimize their health and well-being during survivorship. Previous reviews have shown variable effects of self-management on outcomes. The theoretical basis and psychoeducational components of these interventions have not been evaluated in detail. We aimed to evaluate the evidence for self-management and provide a description of the components of these interventions. We conducted a systematic review of self-management interventions for adults who had completed primary cancer treatment by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, and Cochrane CENTRAL Registry of Controlled Trials. We included experimental and quasiexperimental designs. Data synthesis included narrative and tabular summary of results; heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the risk of bias of nonrandomized studies tool. Forty-one studies published between 1994 and 29 March 2018 were included. Studies were predominantly randomized controlled trials and targeted to breast cancer survivors. A variety of intervention designs, psychoeducational components, and outcomes were identified. Less than 50% of the studies included a theoretical framework. There was variability of effects across most outcomes. Risk of bias could not be fully assessed. There are limitations in the design and research on self-management interventions for cancer survivors that hinder their translation into clinical practice. Further research is needed to understand if these interventions are an important type of support for cancer survivors.

Effectiveness and components of self-management interventions in adult cancer survivors: a protocol for a systematic review and planned meta-analysis

BackgroundSelf-management interventions have been proposed as effective strategies to improve health and well-being and promote optimal coping in cancer survivors. Several reviews have shown benefits of self-management interventions on a variety of patient-reported outcomes. Effective self-management strategies in other chronic disease populations are typically based on theories of behavior change, but the extent of theoretical underpinnings in cancer self-management programs has not been evaluated to date. Our aim is to expand on previous reviews by evaluating the effectiveness of self-management interventions in cancer survivors as well as the theoretical components of such interventions.MethodsWe will conduct a systematic review of self-management interventions for adults who have completed primary treatment for their solid or hematological cancer. Interventions tested using experimental or quasi-experimental methods, with any type of comparator, will be included. A search strategy will be designed with a health sciences librarian and then performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, the National Institutes of Health clinical trials registry, and the Cochrane CENTRAL registry of controlled trials. Data synthesis will include a narrative and tabular summary of the results. Appropriate statistical analysis may include a meta-analysis using random effects methods to determine the effectiveness of self-management interventions and a meta-regression to evaluate how characteristics of the interventions are associated with the intervention effect. Risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized studies tool (RoBANS).DiscussionThe results of this systematic review will add to previous reviews and expand the existing knowledge base of the effectiveness and active components of self-management interventions for adult cancer survivors.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42018085300

A Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions for Children and Adolescents With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Self-management of inflammatory bowel disease is complex. Children and adolescents (CA) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often have difficulty with managing aspects of their condition, resulting in treatment nonadherence and impaired psychosocial function. Self-management interventions are developed to help support patients and their parents/carers to effectively self-manage. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of self-management interventions in children and adolescents with IBD. The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search of the following databases was conducted to identify controlled trials of interventions aiming to enhance IBD self-management in CA: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion. Nine trials (11 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Most were underpowered, with 7 recruiting fewer than 50 participants. The interventions aimed to enhance psychological well-being (n = 5), medication adherence (n = 3), or calcium intake (n = 1). There was considerable heterogeneity in intervention content and outcomes assessment. Some benefits were reported in disease activity, adherence, and psychological well-being, but findings were inconsistent. Self-management is difficult for CA with IBD; however, this review identified only a small number of interventions to support self-management, most of which were underpowered and only 1 that was conducted outside the United States. Clinical consensus is required on which self-management activities should be recommended to patients and targeted in interventions and which core outcomes should be assessed. Adequately powered trials of interventions are required to identify how best to support self-management in CA with IBD.

A Systematic Review of Self‐Management Interventions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

To conduct a systematic review of self-management interventions for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to (a) describe self-management skills in the interventions and (b) describe the effects of the interventions on the health-related outcomes measured. Systematic review of self-management interventions for adults with IBD using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted using Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and Proquest databases. Search terms were inflammatory bowel disease OR Crohn* disease OR ulcerative colitis AND self-management. We also used additional limits (adults ≥ 18 years of age and published in English). The self-management skills were organized according to Lorig and Holman's five self-management skills. Six reports met the inclusion criteria. One intervention contained all five of the self-management skills. Most interventions contained two skills. Four studies demonstrated positive effects of self-management on disease activity. Two interventions revealed positive effects on disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and one intervention revealed positive effects on generic HRQOL. One study showed positive effects of symptoms. The interventions reviewed varied in the approaches, theoretical perspectives, self-management skills, and outcomes measured. Additional research is needed to understand which are the active components of self-management. Support for self-management skills is an important component of nursing care for people with IBD.