You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD45-10 OUTCOMES AFTER HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE, OPEN SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY, AND ROBOTIC SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY: EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER Matthew Lee, Meera Ganesh, Joshua Han, Quan Mai, Mark Assmus, Jessica Helon, Briana Kaplunov, and Amy Krambeck Matthew LeeMatthew Lee More articles by this author , Meera GaneshMeera Ganesh More articles by this author , Joshua HanJoshua Han More articles by this author , Quan MaiQuan Mai More articles by this author , Mark AssmusMark Assmus More articles by this author , Jessica HelonJessica Helon More articles by this author , Briana KaplunovBriana Kaplunov More articles by this author , and Amy KrambeckAmy Krambeck More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002613.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Per AUA guidelines, large prostates (defined as ≥80g in size) can be managed with Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP), Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) or robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP). While these modalities have been previously compared to one another, one study only compared 32 RSPs to 600 HoLEPs. To our knowledge, the three modalities have never been compared against each other in the same cohort. Furthermore, in any published studies, the authors were not performing same-day catheter removal and discharge after HoLEP, indicating the studies must be updated. Herein, we present our experience performing HoLEP, OSP, and RSP for large prostates at a large academic medical center. METHODS: The Northwestern Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) is a system-wide electronic medical record based data platform. We queried the EDW for all patients undergoing HoLEP, OSP, and RSP from Jan 2011 to Oct 2021 for prostates ≥80g. Patients were identified by CPT code (52649, 55831/ 55821, 55899, respectively). Variables were abstracted from the EDW and medical record. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS studio (2021). Multiple comparisons for continuous variables were performed using ANOVA with Tukey’s corrections. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. P-value <0.05 was determined to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The three cohorts were similar in age, BMI, and Carlson comorbidity index. There was no difference in preoperative Hgb, Cr or prostate volume. PSA was higher in the OSP group (p=0.0077). Surgery duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS) and catheter duration were all shortest in the HoLEP group (p<0.0001). OSP had the highest EBL and HoLEP had the lowest EBL (P<0.0001) which also translated into less RBC transfusions for HoLEP and RSP compared to OSP (p<0.0001). There were no differences in ED visits, but RSP had the highest readmission rate (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort where HoLEP patients underwent same-day catheter removal and discharge, despite similar preoperative characteristics, HoLEP was associated with shorter surgery duration, LOS and catheter duration. HoLEP also had the lowest EBL and RBCs transfused with an increase in ED visits or readmissions. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e786 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Lee More articles by this author Meera Ganesh More articles by this author Joshua Han More articles by this author Quan Mai More articles by this author Mark Assmus More articles by this author Jessica Helon More articles by this author Briana Kaplunov More articles by this author Amy Krambeck More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract