Syndesmosis Fixation Research Articles

A Retrospective Case Series of Single-Screw vs Dual-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures.

Medial malleolus fractures (MMFs) are common across the world. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the number of screws used in fixation of MMF. Our aim was to compare the radiographic outcomes of MMF with patients between fractures that have either undergone single-screw (SS) or dual-screw (DS) fixation. This retrospective study assessed patients who had undergone fixation of their MMF from 2012 to 2022. Analysis of their perioperative radiographs was performed to determine the initial type of injury and then radiographic outcomes of nonunion and malunion. A total of 653 patients suffering bimalleolar fractures were identified across a 10-year period. There were 271 patients (41.50%) in the SS group and 382 in the DS group (58.50%). There was no difference found in the nonunion rate of SS (19.19% [52 of 271]) compared with DS (18.85% [72 of 382]) (P = .931). A statistically significant difference between malunion rates was found between the SS group (11.07% [30 of 271]) compared with the DS group (3.93% [15 of 382]) (P < .001).On multiregression analysis, factors that gained significance for development of nonunion was nonfixation of syndesmosis (P = .039), ankle dislocation on arrival (P < .001), and nonrestoration of fibular length (P < .001). Other factors that showed significance for failure to achieve medial anatomical reduction was nonfixation of syndesmosis (P < .001). Use of an SS rather than DS showed a significant increase in nonanatomical reduction but did not increase nonunion or reoperation rate. Syndesmosis fixation was associated with higher rates of MMF nonunion and malunion; as such, surgeons should have a low index of suspicion of injury and fixation. Level III, retrospective case series.

Post-treatment Functional Outcomes of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injuries With Varying Duration and Method of Stabilization

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the type and duration of screw fixation affects ankle joint functional scores and patient activity levels. We evaluated 55 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for ankle fracture with concomitant distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. The follow-up period ranged from 2 years to 4 years and 2 months (mean 36 months). Depending on the time of screw removal, patients were divided into 2 groups (the 8–15-week group-19 patients, and the 16–22-week group-36 patients). There were 17 patients with tricortical and 38 patients with quadricortical syndesmosis fixation. The following parameters were assessed: range of motion, rates of complications, level of pain in visual analogue scale (VAS), and function. In the quadricortical fixation group the range of plantar flexion p = .04 and adduction p = .043 were significantly lower in the operated than in the nonoperated limb. In the patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed after 16–22 weeks, the range of plantar flexion in the operated limb was significantly lower than that in the nonoperated limb. We observed no differences between the evaluated groups in terms of ankle joint mobility, VAS pain levels, functional outcomes, or complication rates. All the analyzed subgroups showed poorer ranges of some types of motion in the ankle and worse functional scale and VAS pain scores after treatment in comparison with those before the injury. We suggest removing the syndesmotic screws after 8–15 weeks, due to the possibility of earlier rehabilitation, faster return to work and physical activity and less burden on the health care system. Tricortical or quadricortical syndesmosis fixation is at the surgeon's discretion.

Postoperative Stability in Displaced Ankle Fractures With Concomitant Ligamentous Injuries

Ankle instability, which can be attributed to either the deltoid or lateral ligamentous complex, may be both a cause and a consequence of ankle fractures. This study aimed to assess postoperative ankle instability in patients with displaced ankle fractures. A total of 54 patients with displaced ankle fractures were included. Malleolar fractures were surgically reduced and fixated, and if necessary, the syndesmosis was stabilized. Concomitant deltoid injuries were left unrepaired. Ankle stress radiographs were taken approximately 25.4 months after surgery, with a standard deviation of 20.5 months. Radiographic measurements included the tibiotalar tilt angle (TT) on varus stress view, anterior translation of the talus (AT) on the anterior drawer view, and the medial clear space (MC) and tibiotalar tilt angle on the valgus stress view. These measurements were compared between the injured and the noninjured contralateral ankle for all patients as well as in a subgroup of 19 patients with concomitant deltoid and syndesmosis injuries. There were no significant differences in Varus TT (p = .675, p = .394), AT (p = .516, p = .967), Valgus MC (p = .190, p = 0.498), and Valgus TT (p = .173, p = .442) between the injured and noninjured ankles in the whole group of patients as well as in the subgroup of patients with concomitant deltoid and syndesmosis injuries. Patients with displaced ankle fractures exhibited radiographically stable ankles postoperatively. Syndesmosis fixation without deltoid ligament repair is a viable treatment option for achieving ankle stability postoperatively in fractures with both ligament injuries.

Effect of Distal Tibiofibular Destabilization and Syndesmosis Compression on the Flexibility Kinematics of the Ankle Bones: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.

Overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture may affect multidirectional flexibility of the ankle bones. Ten cadaveric lower limbs (78.3±13.0 years, 4 female, 6 male) underwent biomechanical testing in sagittal, coronal, and axial rotation with degrees of motion quantified. The intact force (100%) was the force needed to compress the syndesmosis just beyond the intact position, and overcompression was defined as 150% of the intact force. After intact testing, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseus membrane (IOM), and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) were sectioned and testing was repeated. The IOM and AITFL were reconstructed in sequence and tested at 100% and 150% compression. Overcompression of the syndesmosis did not significantly reduce ROM of the ankle bones for any loading modality (P > .05). IOM+AITFL reconstruction restored distal tibiofibular axial rotation to the intact condition. Axial rotation motion was significantly lower with AITFL fixation compared with IOM fixation alone (P < .05). The proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis demonstrated significantly higher motion in axial rotation with all distal reconstruction conditions. As assessed by direct visualization, overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis did not reduce ROM of the ankle bones. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation was significantly lower with IOM+AITFL fixation compared with IOM augmentation alone. Distal tibiofibular axial rotation did not differ significantly from the intact condition after combined IOM+AITFL fixation. Dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis resulted in increased axial rotation at the proximal tibiofibular syndesmosis. These biomechanical data suggest that inadvertent overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis when fixing ankle fractures does not restrict subsequent ankle bone ROM. The AITFL is an important stabilizer of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in external rotation. controlled laboratory study.

A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.

Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. level III therapeutic.

Computed tomography changes diagnosis, management and surgical planning of ankle fractures.

To demonstrate how the use of adjunctive Computed Tomography (CT) can modify diagnosis, treatment options, and operative planning of ankle fractures in comparison with conventional radiographs (CR) in isolation. A total of 53 patients diagnosed with an ankle fracture between 2011 and 2016, were assessed with CT and CR. Evaluations of the fractures using CR in isolation and CR combined with CT were compared using different readers. Fractures were assessed in terms of type, displacement, size, associated injuries, treatment, patient position and surgical planning. The medial malleolus fractures characteristics (posteromedial fragment and anterior colliculus), the presence of posterior malleolus fracture and its characteristics (displacement, size, posteromedial or posterolateral segment) (ps < 0.042), syndesmosis injury (p < 0.001), and the absence of deltoid ligament lesion (p < 0.001), were more evident with the combination of CT and radiographs. There was an increase in operative indication (p = 0.007), prone positioning (p = 0.002), posterior malleolus surgical treatment (p < 0.001), posterolateral approach for the lateral malleolus (p = 0.003), and syndesmosis fixation (p = 0.020) with the association of CT and CR, among all groups of expertise, with a high interobserver reliability (> 0.75). The CR may fail to demonstrate subtle lesions, such as posterior malleolus fractures and syndesmotic injuries. The CT evaluation increases the diagnostic precision and improves the quality of information the surgeon receives, what might positively affect patient care. Retrospective Comparative Study.

Intramedullary osteosynthesis for ankle fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption

Introduction The optimal surgical approach for malleolar fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmotic (DTFS) disruption remains controversial. There is no uniform treatment protocol for this type of injury.The objective was to review modern surgical treatments of the pathology and determine the optimal option.Material and methods Articles of French, English, Uzbek, Kazakh, German, Danish, Japanese and Chinese authors were retrospectively reviewed. An internet search of MedLine; PubMed; Scopus; Web of Science, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed.Results Comparative studies of dynamic fixation and static fixation of the DTFS showed advantages of the dynamic methods enabling precise, anatomical syndesmotic fixation and faster healing. Dynamic fixation methods would require no implant removal, while syndesmotic screw woul be taken off to reduce compression in the ankle joint and minimize a risk of malreduction facilitating mobility of the ankle joint. Dynamic methods are associated with greater stability and less complication rate. However, static methods have the advantages of being more accessible and less expensive, which can be an important factor choosing a treatment method. Static methods are a wide application and can be used in a wide range of clinical cases. Long-term results show no statistically significant differences between dynamic fixation and static fixation.Discussion Literature review indicates the dynamic method with suture-button, a combined method and titanium cable isotonic annular fixation system as the preferred technique for surgical stabilization of distal syndesmosis associated with ankle fractures with a lower risk of postoperative complications and the possibility of short-term rehabilitation.Conclusion The choice between dynamic and static methods of distal syndesmosis fixation depends on many factors, including the complexity of the injury, the availability and cost of implants and the experience of the surgeon.

Reliability of preoperative CT and intraoperative manual tests in syndesmosis injury.

We always confirm the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury with a Hook test for all ankle fractures and fixed if necessary. Then, we noticed a discrepancy between preoperative radiology and the Hook test. Moreover, we want to report the reliability of syndesmotic fixation decisions with Hook test and preoperative radiology. A total of 37 surgically treated patients with isolated Weber type C ankle fractures were included in the study. In all patients, the syndesmosis joint was injured in preoperative computed tomography and X-ray imaging. However, only patients with (+) Hook tests had undergone a syndesmosis fixation. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A: Hook tests (+) and Group B: Hook test (-). Also, the groups were compared according to clinical outcomes with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and foot and ankle disability index (FADI) scores. The mean participant age was 39 (19-80) years, and the mean follow-up period was 47.27 (22-68) months. Groups A and B consisted of 17 (45.9%) and 20 (54.1%) patients, respectively. The mean VAS, AOFAS, and FADI scores were 17.7±14.3, 90.32±8.06, and 92.9±6.88, respectively. "Excellent" and "good" results were found in 34 (%91.8) patients according to AOFAS nad FADI. The malreduction rate was 8.1% in all patients, 5% in group A, and 11.8% in group B. No statistically significant differences in final functional scores were found between groups A and B. Hook test is reliable and adequate for evaluating the stability and quality of syndesmosis reduction. Weber type C lateral malleolar fractures in the decision of syndesmosis fixation; although syndesmosis injury is diagnosed in preoperative radiology, we recommend that the diagnosis be confirmed with the Hook test.

The Center-Center Image Closely Approximates Other Methods for Syndesmosis Reduction Clamp Placement.

The optimal placement for a syndesmosis reduction clamp remains an open question. This study compared the center-center axis, which localizes clamp placement using only an internally rotated lateral ankle X-ray, with other common approaches, whose accuracy can only be confirmed using computed tomography (CT). Bone models of anatomically aligned (n = 6) and malreduced (n = 48) limbs were generated from CT scans of cadaveric specimens. Four axes for guiding clamp placement (center-center, centroid, B2, and trans-syndesmotic) were then analyzed, using digitally reconstructed radiographs derived from the bone models. Each axis' location was defined using angle-height pairs that describe axis orientation along the full anatomical region where syndesmosis fixation occurs. In anatomically aligned limbs, the center-center axis was located on average (±95% CI [confidence interval]), 0.64° (±0.50°) internal rotation, 1.03° (±0.73°) internal rotation, and 2.09° (±7.29°) external rotation from the centroid, B2, and trans-syndesmotic axes, respectively. Fibular displacement altered the magnitude of limb rotation needed to identify the center-center axis. The center-center technique is a valid method that closely approximates previously described methods for syndesmosis clamp placement without using CT, and the magnitude of C-arm rotation needed to transition from a talar dome lateral to a center-center view may be a potential method for assessing syndesmosis reduction. Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Protected immediate weight-bearing is safe after fixation of ankle fractures with syndesmosis injury fixed with position screw. A retrospective case-series study

BackgroundAbout 10% of ankle fractures are located above the syndesmosis, which causes injury to the ligament structure of the syndesmosis. There is no consensus regarding when to allow weight-bearing on the operated limb of patients who suffered ankle fractures requiring intraoperative fixation. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is the evaluation of radiographic parameters of syndesmosis reduction and fixation in patients with ankle fracture who underwent immediate protected weight-bearing (use of walking-boot and crutches). Patient and methodsRetrospective case series from January 2015 to December 2020. Evaluation of the tibiofibular clear space, tibiofibular overlap, and medial clear space in the preoperative x-ray, immediate postoperative, 3-, 6- and 12-month after syndesmosis fixation and rehabilitation with protected immediate weight-bearing with crutches and walking-boot. ResultsOut of 137 ankle fractures 39 were included. There was no significant difference in the tibiofibular clear space between the immediate x-ray and after 12 months (4.5 mm ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 mm ± 1.8; p > 0.999). Tibiofibular overlap hasn't shown significant difference between immediate and 12-month x-ray (6.2 mm ± 2.6 vs. 6.6 mm ± 2.6; p > 0.999). Medial clear space also has shown no worsening from immediate to 12-month x-ray (3.1 mm ± 0.9 vs. 2.8 mm ± 0.9; p > 0.999). There were no fixation failure nor postoperative infection. ConclusionImmediate weight-bearing for patients with ankle fractures with syndesmosis injury and treated with intraoperative fixation with positioning screw proved to be safe with good maintenance of the reduction, no failures of the synthesis material observed and no reports of postoperative infection in the period. Level 3 evidencetherapeutic retrospective case-series.

Syndesmosis Injuries in Lateral Malleolar Fractures Accompanied by a Posterior Malleolar Fracture: A Nonfixed Posterior Fracture Fragment May Not Affect Postoperative Tibiofibular Joint Malreduction Rates.

The fact that lateral malleolar fracture is accompanied by posterior malleolar fracture may adversely affect syndesmosis malreduction rates. We aimed to compare syndesmosis malreduction rates determined on postoperative radiographs between isolated lateral malleolar fractures and lateral malleolar fractures accompanied by posterior malleolar fractures. We retrospectively examined 128 operative patients: 73 with isolated lateral malleolar fractures (group L) and 55 with lateral + posterior malleolar fractures (group LP). In group LP, no patients received posterior fragment fixation. In both groups, indirect syndesmosis fixation was performed with a single screw after open reduction and internal fixation of the lateral malleolus. Patient age, sex, fracture side, fracture type (Lauge-Hansen and Danis-Weber classifications), Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis classification, syndesmotic incongruency on postoperative radiographs, syndesmotic malreduction of postoperative fibula fracture, fracture union time, complication rates, accompanying injuries, and preoperative and postoperative radiographic syndesmotic measurements (tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, medial clear space) were recorded, and the groups were compared. Mean ± SD age was 44.32 ± 15.66 years in group L and 48.93 ± 14.03 years in group LP (P = .087). There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative tibiofibular distance, tibiofibular overlap, and medial clear space values between groups (P > .05). The prevalence of grade 2 fractures according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification was significantly higher in group LP (P = .047). Postoperative syndesmosis malreduction was detected in 12 patients in group L and in nine in group LP (P = .991). In lateral malleolar fractures accompanied by small-fragment posterolateral or avulsion-type posterior malleolar fractures, closed syndesmotic screw fixation does not cause syndesmosis malreduction.

A Retrospective Comparison of Single Screw vs Dual Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Medial Malleolus Fractures (MMF) are frequently managed by orthopaedic surgeons and are one of the most treated fractures of the ankle. Many approaches to fixation are described in the literature. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the number of screws used in fixation when attempting lag-screw fixation of MMF. Aim: To compare the outcomes of MMF with patients between fractures which have either undergone single-screw (SS) or dual-screw (DS) fixation. Methods: Patients who had undergone surgical fixation of their MMF were identified from 2012 to 2022, using electronic patient records. Analysis of their pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative radiographs was performed to determine the initial type of injury and then surgical outcomes relating to non-union, malunion and whether revision surgery was required. Results: A total of 653 patients were identified across a 10-year period. There were 271 patients (41.50%) in the SS group and 382 patients in the DS group (58.50%). When comparing the outcomes of SS compared to DS, a non-union rate of 19.19% (52/271) was found in the SS group as compared to 18.85% (72/382) in the DS group. There was a malunion rate of 11.07% (30/271) in the SS group as compared to 3.93% (15/382) in the DS group, which was statistically significant (p &lt;.001). On multi regression analysis, the other factors which gained significance for development of non-union was non fixation of syndesmosis (p= .039), ankle dislocation on arrival (p &lt;.001) and non-restoration of fibular length (p &lt;.001). Conclusion: Use of a single screw rather than double screw showed a significant increase in non-anatomical reduction but did not increase non-union or reoperation rate. Syndesmosis fixation has clear impact on the stresses on the medial malleolus and should have a low index of suspicion of injury and fixation.

Effect of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Overcompression on the Biomechanical Properties of the Ankle Bones: An In Vitro Cadaveric Model

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Overtightening of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures remains a clinical concern, and there are limited data delineating the effect of syndesmosis overcompression on subsequent range of motion of the ankle joint bones. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the effect of syndesmotic overcompression on the relative range of motion (ROM) of the tibia, fibula, and talus, and to determine the syndesmotic fixation construct that most accurately restores native motion. Methods: Ten cadaveric lower limbs were utilized (78.3±13.0 yrs, 4F; 6M). A musculoskeletal simulator at ±7.5 Nm was used to test flexibility in dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, inversion-eversion, and internal-external rotation. After intact testing, syndesmotic probes were used to arthroscopically measure the intact position of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The force needed to compress the syndesmosis just beyond the intact position represented the intact force (100%), and overcompression was defined as 150% of the intact force. The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseus membrane (IOM), and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) were then sectioned. Testing was repeated for destabilized, IOM reconstruction at 100% compression and 150% overcompression, IOM reconstruction plus AITFL fixation at 100% compression and 150% overcompression, and AITFL fixation alone. ROM data was reported as a percentage of the intact condition. Repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test were performed to assess differences between conditions with p&lt; 0.05. Results: Average force needed to compress the syndesmosis was 71.0 ± 22.2 N. There was a significant increase in distal tibiofibular ROM in internal and external rotation for all conditions compared to intact (Figure 1) (p &lt; 0.05). In the axial plane, reconstruction of the IOM membrane did not restore the intact condition and was similar to the destabilized treatment, regardless of compression force. The addition of AITFL fixation significantly reduced distal tibiofibular motion compared to IOM reconstructions alone, but still did not approach the intact condition. Overcompression of the syndesmosis did not significantly affect relative ROM of the ankle bones in any plane (p&gt;0.05). Changes in the proximal tibiofibular ROM were similar in magnitude and direction as the distal tibiofibular ROM for all conditions. Conclusion: In the current study, overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis did not restrict relative ROM of the tibia, fibula, or talus. Reconstructing the AITFL in addition to the IOM decreased tibiofibular ROM, particularly in the axial plane. In the clinical setting, surgical reconstruction with dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis may result in increased ROM and mechanical stress at the proximal tibiofibular articulation.

Validation of the Angle Bisector Method for Precise Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Fixation Angle Using Computed Tomography and 3D-Printed Models

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The proposed ideal alignment for the syndesmosis involves a line connecting the centroids of the fibula and tibia, but there is uncertainty about the optimal intraoperative method for determining the appropriate fixation angle. This is due to the fact that the AO guidelines do not account for patient or level-specific factors, and the determination of the angle relative to the coronal plane relies on the surgeon's judgment. Inexperienced trauma surgeons may encounter significant problems with syndesmotic malalignment as a result. The goal of this study was to validate the effectiveness of the angle bisector method using computed tomography and 3D-printed ankle models, in order to determine whether it can assist in achieving proper screw trajectory for syndesmotic fixation. Methods: The angle bisector method was utilized to identify a precise trajectory for the true syndesmotic axis, using the bisector of the angle formed by two lines tangential to the anterior and posterior fibula and tibia. CT validation was made on CT angiography of 50 consecutive patients. DICOM data from 16 ankles were used to create 3D anatomical models which were printed using a desktop FDM printer. Two trauma surgeons performed syndesmotic fixations using the angle bisector method at 2 cm and 3.5 cm proximal to the joint space, after identifying the bisector of the angle formed by two K-wires tangential to the anterior and posterior fibula and tibia. The axial sections of CTs and printed 3D-models were analyzed using software to determine the relationship between centroidal axis and the inserted screws. The measurements were made twice by two blinded observers, with a two-week interval. Results: The results of the study show that the angle bisector method provides a reliable direction with minimal differences at both the 2 cm and 3.5 cm levels. The average angle between the centroidal axis and screw trajectory was 2.4° ± 2° at the 2 cm level and 1.3° ± 1.5° at the 3.5 cm level. Furthermore, the average distance between the fibular entry points of the centroidal axis and screw trajectory was less than 1 mm at both levels, indicating that the angle bisector method can serve as an excellent entry point for syndesmotic fixation on the fibula. The inter- and intra-surgeon analyses showed excellent consistency, with all ICC values above 0.90. Similarly, inter- and intra-observer consistencies regarding the measurements were also excellent. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the angle bisector method was successful in identifying the original syndesmotic axis and aided in the precise placement of implants in the desired direction. The method has the potential to be replicated intraoperatively and could serve as a basis for the development of a novel surgical guide for determining the correct syndesmotic axis. However, safety analysis using cadavers should be conducted prior to clinical implementation.

Radiographic Evaluation of Syndesmosis Stabilisation Using the TightRope System Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation for the Management of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury.

Background Ankle syndesmotic injuries represent complex orthopaedic injuries, commonly requiring open reduction and fixation. Several techniques have been described for fixation, with syndesmotic screwfixation being traditionally considered as the 'gold standard'. Among the relatively new techniques developed, the TightRope system stabilisation provides 'dynamic' stabilisation with promising results. We aimed to evaluate the radiographic performance of these two different surgical techniques in the management ofankle fractures with an underlying syndesmotic injury. Methods A total of 85 cases were included in the studyand were divided into two groups: syndesmotic screw fixation (48 cases) and TightRope system (37 cases). Patient demographics, type of ankle fracture and type of implant used were recorded for all the cases, andevaluation of the postoperative radiographs was performed for all. For all patients, the radiographic parameters assessed included the medial clear joint space (MCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and anterior and posterior tibiofibular interval in order to calculate the anterior tibiofibular ratio (ATFR). Results Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the radiographic parameters of the postoperative radiographs between the twogroups. However, in the syndesmotic screw group, a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction was seen, as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters, in comparison to the TightRope fixation group. An equal distribution of radiographic abnormal parameters was noted among the different types of ankle fractures included in the study (trimalleolar, bimalleolar and isolated fibula fractures with syndesmotic injury) with no obvious positive correlation noted (Pearson correlation test). Conclusion Both surgical techniques seem to provide adequate reduction of the syndesmosis, with no statistical significant differences detected from the radiographic evaluation of both groups. In our study though, the syndesmotic screw group was associated with a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters. The TightRope system seems to have a lower rate of radiographic malreduction and provides an equally effective way of syndesmosis fixation based on a dynamic mode of stabilisation.

Center-Center Surgical Technique With Dynamic Syndesmosis Fixation: A Cadaveric Pilot Study

The objective of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to evaluate if the center-center surgical technique is a reliable and repeatable method of achieving proper syndesmotic reduction when using dynamic syndesmotic fixation. Nine fresh frozen above-knee cadaveric lower extremities were used. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were first obtained for each intact specimen as the baseline for comparison. A simulated complete syndesmotic disruption was created by transection of all deltoid and syndesmotic ligaments. Instability of the ankle was confirmed with stress imaging using fluoroscopy. Each unstable specimen was repaired using the center-center surgical technique with dynamic syndesmosis fixation. A series of measurements from the axial CT images of intact and repaired specimens were used to determine the anatomic distal tibiofibular relationships for comparison of changes from intact to postfixation. All radiographic measurements were performed by 4 independent foot and ankle surgeons. The level of inter-rater reliability for all the measurements was found to be "moderate" to "excellent" agreement (ICC value: 0.865-0.983, 95% confidence interval: 0.634-0.996). There was no statistical difference found between rotational alignment of native and postfixation (a/b: p=.843; b-a: p=.125; θ: p=.062). There was a statistical difference detected for lateral alignment at the center of fibularis incisura between native and postfixation (average: -0.6 ± 0.8 mm, range: -2.3 to 1.2 mm, p < .001). There was no statistical difference found for the anteroposterior translation alignment between native and postfixation (d/e: p=.251; f: p=.377). This study demonstrated the use of the center-center surgical technique as a viable and repeatable method for achieving anatomical reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis when used with dynamic fixation modalities.

Technique Tip: Using a Targeting Guide to Place Flexible Syndesmosis Fixation, in Ankle Fractures With a Dual Plate Construct

Syndesmosis disruption alone or accompanying an ankle fracture is a frequent injury addressed by the foot and ankle surgeon. Reduction and fixation are usually performed with the use of implants as a tight rope and/or screw(s). When treating complex articular injuries requiring multiple buttress plates, the ability to enhance fixation with syndesmotic implants can be difficult in the presence of other hardware. We propose a technique using an anterior cruciate ligament targeting drill guide to precisely place syndesmotic fixation across both plates to achieve the ideal construct for stability. In this case, we used flexible fixation for the syndesmosis. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic level V; expert opinion.

A Novel Flexible Fixation Method for Syndesmotic Injury.

This study aims to evaluate the results and the safety of a novel fixation method we developed for syndesmosis injuries that we call the "embrace" technique. Between March 2018 and October 2020, a total of 67 patients with ankle fractures and syndesmotic injuries underwent syndesmosis fixation with the embrace technique at our institute. Plain radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative radiographic assessment included anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs and CT scans of both ankles. Additionally, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used for postoperative assessment. The mean age was 27.6 ± 10.9 (range, 14-56) years. The mean follow-up time was 30.3 ± 6.2 (range, 24-48) months. There were no malreductions indicated by any CT parameter except fibular rotation in a postoperative comparison between 2 sides. We found significant preoperative-postoperative changes in anterior difference, posterior difference, and fibular rotation but no significant preoperative-postoperative difference in fibular translation. There was no significant postoperative difference between the affected-side and normal-side measurements of any parameter. Complications included delayed wound healing, lateral pain because of wire knot irritation (11.9%), and medial fiber wire irritation (7.5%). The mean AOFAS, Olerud-Molander, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 94.4 ± 6.8 (range, 84-100), 95.4 ± 6.1 (range, 80-100), and 0.68 ± 1.0 (range, 0-3) points, respectively. In our cohort, this novel technique proved to be an effective method for syndesmosis fixation in patients with ankle fractures associated with very good radiologic and patient-reported outcomes. Level IV, case series.

Transosseous Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Comparison of Interosseous Suture and Endobutton Across Age Groups.

Background In the ankle, suture bridge fixation for syndesmotic injuries is commonly employed. Initial recommendations for suture bridge constructs advised against using the device in patients with insufficient quantity or quality of bone. Therefore, many surgeons limit its use to younger, more athletic patients and use traditional screw fixation in older, less active patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of suture bridge fixation for syndesmotic repair in patients ≥ 60 years old vs patients < 60 years old. Methods A retrospective review of 140 ankle fracture patients from a single institution who received suture bridge fixation between July 13, 2010, and February 2, 2022, was performed. Patient data was obtained from patient records in theelectronic health record. Univariate analysis, including chi-square and independent t-tests, was used.Complications included delayed wound healing, infection, hardware loosening, and non-union. Results There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, primary or other procedures, loss of fixation, and neuropathy between groups. There was also no difference within the distribution of the mechanism of injury, affected side, or Weber classification. Finally, the rate of complication and complication type showed no significant differences between patients 60 years and older versus 60 years and younger. Complication rates and types in patients > 60 years versus < 60 years were not significantly different. Conclusion The use of the suture bridge fixation in patients > 60 years may not lead to an increased risk of complications and appears to be safe for use.

ANKLE PRESERVATION: TWO CASES OF CABLE TRANSPORT FOR BONY DEFECTS FOLLOWING ANEURYSMAL BONE CYST RESECTION

IntroductionAneurysmal bone cysts commonly found in lower limbs are locally aggressive masses that can lead to bony erosion, instability and fractures. This has major implications in the lower limbs especially in paediatric patients, with potential growth disturbance and deformity. In this case series we describe radical aneurysmal bone cyst resection and lower limb reconstruction using cable transport and syndesmosis preservation.Materials &amp; MethodsCase 1 - A 12-year-old boy presented with a two-week history of atraumatic right ankle pain. An X-ray demonstrated a distal tibia metaphyseal cyst confirmed on biopsy as an aneurysmal bone cyst. The cyst expanded on interval X-rays from 5.5cm to 8.5cm in 9 weeks. A wide-margin en-bloc resection was performed leaving a 13.8cm tibial defect. A cable transport hexapod frame and a proximal tibial osteotomy was performed, with syndesmosis screw fixation. The transport phase lasted 11 months. While in frame, the boy sustained a distal femur fracture from a fall. The femur and the docking site were plated at the same sitting and frame removed. At one-year post-frame removal he is pain-free, with full ankle dorsiflexion but plantarflexion limited to 25 degrees. He has begun graduated return to sport.ResultsCase 2 - A 12-year-old girl was referred with a three-month history of lateral left ankle swelling. X-ray demonstrated an aneurysmal bone cyst in the distal fibula metaphysis. The cyst grew from 4.2 × 2.3cm to 5.2 × 3.32cm in 2 months. A distal fibula resection (6.2cm) with syndesmosis fixation and hexapod cable transport frame were undertaken. The frame was in situ for 13 weeks and during this time she required an additional osteotomy for premature consolidation and had one pin site infection. After 13 weeks a second syndesmosis screw was placed, frame removed, and a cast applied. 3 months later she had fibular plating, BMAC and autologous iliac crest bone graft for slow union. At 3 years post-operative she has no evidence of recurrence, is pain-free and has no functional limitation.ConclusionsWe describe two cases of ankle syndesmosis preservation using cable transport for juxta-articular aneurysmal bone cysts. This allows wide resection to prevent recurrence while also preserving primary ankle stability and leg length in children. Both children had a minor complication, but both had an excellent final outcome. Cable bone transport and prophylactic syndesmosis stabilization allows treatment of challenging juxta-articular aneurysmal bone cysts about the ankle. These techniques are especially useful in large bone defects.