Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Upfront Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab: A Pooled Analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 Studies.

The decision to resect or not the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and challenging issue for oncologists, especially when an antiangiogenic-based therapy is planned. Patients enrolled in the phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies that compared upfront FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + bevacizumab, respectively, were included. We assessed the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR), rate of grade > 2 adverse events (AEs), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs in the overall population and according to the treatment arm. Of the 999 patients included, 513 (51%) underwent PTR at baseline. Longer PFS and OS were observed in resected patients compared to those with unresected primary tumors: 11.2 vs. 10.0 months (p < 0.001) and 26.6 vs. 22.5 (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate models, PTR was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for better PFS (p = 0.032) and OS (p = 0.018). Patients with PTR experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (p = 0.055) and lower incidence of anemia (p = 0.053), perforation (p = 0.015), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted in incidence of bleeding (p = 0.39). The benefit of FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in terms of PFS (p for interaction: 0.46), OS (p for interaction: 0.80), ORR (p for interaction: 0.36), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was independent of PTR. PTR at baseline was independently associated with good prognosis in synchronous mCRC patients and with lower incidence of serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs during upfront chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The benefit and toxicity profile of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was independent of PTR.

Factors Affecting the Survival of Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Little is known about Indonesian metastatic CRC patients’ survival and prognostic factors, although this malignancy is one the most frequent cancer in the country. We aimed to investigate the survival outcome and the factors influencing local CRC patients presenting with a metastatic stage at diagnosis.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done on 441 data of synchronous metastatic CRC cases treated between January 2016 and December 2019 at Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Secondary data were collected from the CRC clinical registry database. Demographic, clinicopathology and the type of treatment were collected. Survival staus was obtained from the registry database and communication to patients or caring families. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the overall survival (O.S). The Cox proportional hazards regression mode was applied to analyzethe potential factors affecting survival. Results: The median follow up of the recent study was 17 months, The median overall survival was 13 months. Two-year overall survival was 37% and the estimated 5-year overall survival was 16.1%. Multivariate cox analyses identified poor performance status (HR 2.639, 95% CI 1.438-4.842, p = 0.002), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (HR 2.795, 95% CI 1.509-5.176, p = 0.001) and higher histological grade (HR 2.019, 95% CI 1.112-3.667, p = 0.021) were associated with poorer overall.Conclusion: Poor performance status, high CEA level, and higher histological grade as factors that were associated with unfavourable overall survival of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Clinical Outcomes of Upfront Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

The role of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer without severe symptoms remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the role of PTR in overall survival (OS) in this population. Among the 205 patients who enrolled, the PTR group (n = 42) showed better performance (p = 0.061), had higher frequencies of right-sided origin (p = 0.058), the T4 stage (p = 0.003), the M1a stage (p = 0.012), and <2 organ metastases (p = 0.002), and received fewer targeted agents (p = 0.011) than the chemotherapy group (n = 163). The PTR group showed a trend for longer OS (20.5 versus 16.0 months, p = 0.064) but was not related to OS in Cox regression multivariate analysis (p = 0.220). The male sex (p = 0.061), a good performance status (p = 0.078), the T3 stage (p = 0.060), the M1a stage (p = 0.042), <2 organ metastases (p = 0.035), an RAS wild tumor (p = 0.054), and the administration of targeted agents (p = 0.037), especially bevacizumab (p = 0.067), seemed to be related to PTR benefits. Upfront PTR could be considered beneficial in some subgroups, but these findings require larger studies to verify.

Upfront palliative resection of primary tumor versus no resection in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer: The randomized phase 3 CAIRO4 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG).

3517 Background: Primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been associated with a survival benefit in comparative cohort studies. In the CAIRO4 phase III randomized trial, the potential benefit of upfront PTR followed by systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone was investigated. Methods: Main eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed CRC, unresectable metastases, resectable primary tumor in situ without related severe symptoms, and WHO performance status (PS) 0-2. Eligible patients were randomized to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without upfront PTR strategy. Randomization was stratified for number of metastatic sites (1 versus more), institution, WHO PS (0-1 versus 2), serum LDH (normal versus &gt; ULN), and location of the primary tumor (left versus right-sided). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), which was analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT) using the MaxCombo test. The original sample size of 306 patients was amended to 206 participants due to slow accrual. With final primary analysis based on 181 events, the study had 71% power to detect the OS difference of 19 versus 13 months deemed clinically relevant in the original sample size calculation. The trial is registered as NCT01606098. Results: Between August 2012 and February 2021, 206 patients were randomized: 103 patients to each arm. Two patients in the upfront PTR arm were excluded due to ineligibility. A total of 204 patients (57% male, median age 65 [IQR 59 -71] years, 50% right-sided CRC and 98% WHO PS 0-1) were included with a median follow-up of 63.6 months. In the upfront PTR arm 5% of patients did not undergo PTR and 13% did not receive subsequent systemic therapy. In the arm without upfront PTR, 1% of patients did not receive systemic therapy. The median number of cycles was 9 [IQR 4-15] in the upfront PTR arm versus 11 [6-16] in the arm without upfront PTR. Median OS was 20.5 (95% CI 17.0 – 25.1) months in the upfront PTR arm and 18.3 (95% CI 16.0 – 22.2) months in the arm without upfront PTR (p = 0.345). Median PFS was 10.1 (95% CI 8.7-11.7) months in the upfront PTR arm and 10.1 (95% CI 8.6-11.8) months in the arm without upfront PTR (p = 0.805). At a later point in their disease course, 1.9% of patients in the arm without upfront PTR underwent a colostomy and 16.5% required PTR for symptom palliation. Conclusions: In patients with synchronous metastatic CRC amenable to palliative systemic therapy without severe symptoms related to the primary tumor, upfront PTR did not result in a significant median OS difference compared to immediate start with systemic treatment. Funding: This work was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (grant KUN 2012-5697) and Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT01606098 .

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer at Diagnosis Predicts Overall Patient Survival.

Sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) initially presents as metastatic tumors in 25-30% of patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic sCRC is 50%, falling to 10% in patients presenting with synchronous metastatic disease (stage IV). In this study, we systematically analyzed the mutations of RAS, PIK3CA and BRAF genes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumoral tissue DNA (ttDNA) from 51 synchronous metastatic colorectal carcinoma (SMCC) patients by real-time PCR, and their relationship with the clinical, biological and histological features of disease at diagnosis. The highest frequency of mutations detected was in the KRAS gene, in tumor biopsies and plasma samples, followed by mutations of the PIK3CA, NRAS and BRAF genes. Overall, plasma systematically contained those genetic abnormalities observed in the tumor biopsy sample from the same subject, the largest discrepancies detected between the tumor biopsy and plasma from the same patient being for mutations in the KRAS and PIK3CA genes, with concordances of genotyping results between ttDNA and ctDNA at diagnosis of 75% and 84%, respectively. Of the 51 SMCC patients in the study, 25 (49%) showed mutations in at least 1 of the 4 genes analyzed in patient plasma. From the prognostic point of view, the presence and number of the most common mutations in the RAS, PIK3CA and BRAF genes in plasma from SMCC patients are independent prognostic factors for OS. Determination of the mutational status of ctDNA in SMCC could be a key tool for the clinical management of patients.

Optimal Surgical Treatment Tactics in Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Aim: The aim of the study is to choose the optimal tactics of surgical treatment in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous intra-abdominal metastases. Materials and methods: The study included 74 patients with CRC with synchronous intra-abdominal metastases (peritoneal carcinomatosis and/or liver metastases), which were divided into 3 groups: I group (25 patients)-Intestinal stoma + neoadjuvant chemotherapy + Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) + Adjuvant Chemotherapy (ACT); II group (18 patients)-Colon/rectal resection + ACT + CRS + ACT; III group (31 patients)-CRS + ACT. Results: The best oncological results were obtained in III group (median overall survival 46 months vs 27m. in I group and 31m. in II group). In contrast, a higher incidence of postoperative complications was observed also in this group (29%). There is no significant difference in overall survival (p&gt;0.05 according to Log-Rank test) and the rate of postoperative complications between all groups of patients. The mean length of hospital stay was shorter in III group-9.8 days (p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: All three options could be selected for the treatment of synchronous metastatic CRC. Therefore, the main goal remains the achievement of complete cytoreduction. So, it is necessary to focus on its possibility when choosing the sequence of stages of treatment in such patients. However, if it is possible to achieve complete cytoreduction and in the setting of the oncological center it is recommended cytoreductive surgery as the first step followed by adjuvant chemotherapy as the best treatment tactics for patients with synchronous metastatic CRC.

Time trends in treatment patterns and survival of older patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer in the Netherlands: A population-based study.

New treatment strategies have improved survival of metastatic colorectal cancer in trials. However, it is not clear whether older patients benefit from these novel therapies, as they are often not included in pivotal trials. Therefore, we investigated treatment patterns and overall survival over time in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a population-based study. We identified 22.192 Dutch patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2020 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in treatment over time were assessed with logistic regression models. Survival was assessed by Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results showed that chemotherapy use increased between 2005 and 2015, but declined from 2015 onwards, while more patients received best supportive care. Over time, fewer patients underwent primary tumor resection alone. Although survival of both metastatic colon and rectal cancer improved until 2014, survival of colon cancer decreased from 2014 onwards (HR 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), which was seen in all age groups. Survival of metastatic rectal cancer patients remained unchanged from 2014 onwards (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.03) in all age groups. In conclusion, treatment patterns of Dutch older patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer rapidly changed from 2005 to 2020, with increasing percentages of patients receiving best supportive care. Survival of metastatic colon cancer decreased from 2014 onwards. The implementation of a colorectal cancer screening program and patient selection might explain why only a subset of older patients seem to benefit from the availability of novel treatment options.

Time-varying prognostic value of primary tumor sidedness in metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based study and meta-analysis.

We studied the prognostic value of primary tumor sidedness in metastatic colorectal cancer over time and across treatment lines. Population data on synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer patients were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and SEER database. Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched for prospective studies on metastatic colorectal cancer to conduct a meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria consisted of metastatic disease, systemic treatment with palliative intent and specification of primary tumor location. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. For the population-based data, multivariable Cox models were constructed. The Grambsch-Therneau test was conducted to evaluate the potential time-varying nature of sidedness. Meta-regression incorporating treatment-line as variable was conducted to test the pre-specified hypothesis that the prognostic value of sidedness varies over time. Analysis of 12 885 and 16 160 synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer patients registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry and SEER database, respectively, indicated a time-varying prognostic value of sidedness (P < .01). Thirty-one studies were selected for the meta-analysis (9558 patients for overall survival analysis). Pooled univariable hazard ratioleft-sided/right-sided for overall survival was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.76) in 1st-line, 0.76 (0.54-1.06) in 2nd-line and 1.01 (0.86-1.19) in 3rd-line studies. Hazard ratios were significantly influenced by treatment line (P=.035). The prognostic value of sidedness of the primary tumor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with palliative systemic therapy decreases over time since diagnosis, suggesting that sidedness may not be a useful stratification factor in late-line trials. This decrease in prognostic value should be taken into account when providing prognostic information to patients.

The effect of primary tumour resection on patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-containing regimens.

This study aims to assess the effect of primary tumour resection (PTR) on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with cetuximab. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary cancer center in Turkey. Patients with mCRC between January 2009 and December 2020 were extracted from the electronic hospital management system. Patients with RAS wild-type synchronous metastatic left-sided colon or rectum cancer who had cetuximab-containing treatment protocol were included in the study. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcome was response rates. A total of 111 patients with mCRC were included in this study. PTR was performed in 57.7% of all patients. Fifty-nine (53.2%) and 52 (46.8%) patients had rectal and left colon tumours, respectively. The combination treatment with cetuximab was FOLFIRI in 62.2% and FOLFOX in 29.7% of all patients. In subgroup analysis, the median PFS was 7.9 and 9months in PTR (+) and PTR (-) patients, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P= 0.3). The median OS was 33 months in all patients. In subgroup analysis, the median OS was 39 and 27.9months in PTR (+) and PTR (-) patients, respectively. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P= 0.002). After adjusting for confounding factors, PTR and ECOG performance score were the independent prognostic factors for OS. PTR improved the OS in patients with RAS wild-type synchronous left-sided colon or rectum cancer treated with cetuximab-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Temporal development in survival, and gender and regional differences in the Swedish population of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer

Background Survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has markedly improved in patients included in clinical trials. In population-based materials, improvements were seen until about a decade ago, but it is unclear if survival has continued to improve. It is also unclear if regional or gender differences exist. Material and methods All patients with mCRC (N = 19,566) in Sweden between 2007 and 2016 were identified from the national quality register, SCRCR, with almost complete coverage. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of metastatic disease was calculated in two calendar periods, 2007–2011 and 2012–2016. Differences between groups were compared using Cox regression. Results Median age was 72 years, 55% were males, synchronous presentation was seen in 13,630 patients and metachronous in 5936. In synchronous disease, the primary tumour was removed more often during the first than the second period (51% vs 41%, p < 0.001). Median OS (mOS) was 14.0 months. It was longer in those with metachronous than synchronous disease (17.6 vs 13.1 months, p < 0.001) and in males (15.0 vs 12.8 months, p < 0.001), and markedly influenced by age and primary location. It was longer in patients diagnosed during the second period than during the first (14.9 vs 13.1 months, HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.86–0.92), p < 0.001). This difference was seen in all subgroups according to sex, age, presentation, and sidedness. mOS was about one month shorter in 1/6 healthcare regions, most pronounced during the first period. Differences in median of up to 5 months were seen between the region with the shortest and longest mOS. Conclusions Overall survival in Swedish patients with mCRC has improved during the past decade but is still substantially worse than reported from clinical trials/hospital-based series, reflecting the selection of patients to trials. Regional differences were seen, but they decreased with time. Women did not have a poorer prognosis in multivariable analyses.

Sex differences in metastatic surgery following diagnosis of synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer.

The aim was to investigate gender differences in the likelihood to receive metastatic surgery, and to compare overall survival between men and women, among patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a population-based setting. All Swedish adult patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC in 2007-2016 were identified using the nationwide colorectal cancer database (CRCBaSe). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, comparing the odds of receiving treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival proportions and Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of all-cause mortality rates. All multivariable models were adjusted for age, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, year of diagnosis, location of primary tumor and single or multiple metastatic locations. A total of 12 201 patients met the study criteria. Women received 23% less metastatic surgery for mCRC (adjusted OR=0.77, CI:0.69-0.86) and experienced a slightly higher mortality following diagnosis (adjusted HR=1.09, CI:1.05-1.14). In analyses restricted to patients who received metastatic surgery, no significant differences in mortality were found. In conclusion, this population-based study showed that women less often received metastatic surgery of mCRC and experienced slightly higher all-cause mortality compared with men. The differences persisted despite adjustments of patient and cancer characteristics. Gender differences in receiving treatment are unacceptable if the underlying explanation cannot be motivated. Further studies are needed to understand if the differences are based on sex (i.e., biology) or gender (including clinically unmotivated differences in treatment approach).

Care Management and Survival of Patients Diagnosed with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A High-Resolution Population-Based Study in Two French Areas.

Simple SummaryThe management of colorectal cancer with synchronous metastasis is complex and heterogenous depending on numerous factors related to patients and health care organisation. The description of real-word medical practices is challenging. While hospital series are mainly promoted by highly specialised hospitals and are not in position to accurately measure the heterogeneity of patients and practices, cancer registries are essential to describe such practices in the area covered with no regards to hospital status nor degree of specialisation. The goals of our study were to describe the colorectal cancer with synchronous metastasis population and to evaluate the impact of the different treatments on survival. Our results indicate that a combined treatment, chemotherapy and primary tumor resection, is the cornerstone of oncological management, with survival being negatively impacted by other treatment strategies.Population-based studies provide the opportunity to assess the real-world applicability of current clinical practices. The present research evaluated the survival outcomes of different therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous metastasis (SM). The differential impact of treatment sequence, viz. whether chemotherapy (CT) or primary tumor resection (PTR) was performed first, was also evaluated. Methods: All CRC cases with SM diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 (N = 3062) were selected from two specialized digestive cancer registries from northwest France. Cox regression analysis was used to assess survival. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors related to the combination of PTR and CT. Results: The longest survival was observed in patients treated by PTR combined with CT (Group 4; N = 1159). Overall survival was 51.80% at one year (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 50.00–53.60%) and 9.40% at five years (95% CI, 8.30–10.60%). Survival did not differ with respect to the order of treatment in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88–1.24; p = 0.55). Conclusion: Regardless of the sequence of treatment, a PTR + CT offered the best survival in patients with CRC and SM, even though few were eligible for combination therapy (38%).

Upfront primary tumour resection and survival in synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer according to primary tumour location and RAS status: Pooled analysis of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)

IntroductionRetrospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that upfront primary tumour resection (UPTR) confers a survival benefit in patients with asymptomatic unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing chemotherapy, however a consensus of its role in routine clinical practice in the current era of targeted therapies is lacking. This retrospective study aimed to analyse the survival benefit of UPTR in terms of tumour location and mutational status, in patients with synchronous mCRC receiving chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients and methodsSurvival was analysed in a pooled cohort of synchronous mCRC patients treated with a first-line anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR inhibitor in seven trials of the Spanish TTD group, according to UPTR, tumour-sidedness and mutational profiling. ResultsOf 1334 eligible patients, 642 (48%) had undergone UPTR. UPTR was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS; 25.0 vs 20.3 months; HR 1.30, 95%CI 1.15–1.48; p < 0.0001). UPTR was associated with significant OS benefit in both left-sided (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.13–1.69; p = 0.002) and right-sided (HR 1.39, 95%CI 1.00–1.94; p = 0.049) tumours, RASwt (HR 1.29, 95%CI 1.05–1.60; p = 0.016) and BRAFwt (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.21–1.84; p = 0.0002) tumours, and treatment with anti-EGFRs (HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.13–1.92; p = 0.004) and anti-VEGFs (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.08–1.44; p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified number of metastatic sites, RAS status, primary tumour location and UPTR as independent prognostic factors for OS. ConclusionConsidering the selection bias inherent to this study, our results support UPTR before first-line anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF targeted therapy in right and left-sided asymptomatic unresectable synchronous mCRC patients. RAS/BRAF mutational status may also influence UPTR function.

Liver-first approach for synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer

Liver-first approach for synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer

418P Upfront primary tumour resection (UPTR) and survival in synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer according to primary tumour location and RAS status: Pooled analysis of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)

Retrospective studies and meta-analysis suggest that UPTR confers a survival benefit in patients with asymptomatic unresectable mCRC undergoing chemotherapy, however a consensus of its role in routine clinical practice in the current era of targeted therapies is lacking. This study aimed to analyse the survival benefit of UPTR in the context of tumour location and mutational status in patients receiving chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

503P Mutational landscape in synchronous unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) according to upfront primary tumour resection (UPTR)

Most retrospective data suggest that UPTR confers a survival benefit in patients with unresectable synchronous asymptomatic mCRC. The possible mechanisms that could explain the different outcomes based on UPTR or not are not known.

Interaction Between Primary Tumor Resection, Primary Tumor Location, and Survival in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Location of the primary tumor has prognostic value and predicts the effect of certain therapeutics in synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer. We investigated whether the association between primary tumor resection (PTR) and overall survival (OS) also depends on tumor location. Data on synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n=16,106) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (n=19,584) were extracted. Cox models using time-varying covariates were implemented. Median OS for right-sided colon cancer (RCC), left-sided colon cancer, and rectal cancer was calculated using inverse probability weighting and a landmark point of 6 months after diagnosis as reference. The association between PTR and OS was dependent on tumor location (P<0.05), with a higher median OS of upfront PTR versus upfront systemic therapy in Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) of 1.9 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-2.8), 4.3 (3.3-5.6), and 3.4 (0.6-7.6) months in RCC, left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer, respectively. In SEER data, the difference was 6.0 (4.0-8.0), 8.0 (5.0-10.0), and 10.0 (7.0-13.0) months, respectively. Hazard plots indicate a higher hazard of death 2 to 3 months after PTR in RCC. Upfront PTR is associated with improved survival regardless of primary tumor location. Patients with RCC appear to have less benefit because of higher mortality during 2 to 3 months after PTR.

Survival outcome and prognostic factors for colorectal cancer with synchronous bone metastasis: a population-based study.

Prognostic factors of synchronous bone metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are still undetermined. We aimed to investigate survival outcome and prognostic factors of patients with synchronous bone metastatic CRC. Information of patients with synchronous bone metastatic CRC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and West China Hospital (WCH) databases. Cases from SEER database composed construction cohort, while cases from WCH database were used as validation cohort. A novel nomogram was constructed to predict individual survival probability based on Cox regression model. The performance of the nomogram was internally and externally validated using calibration curves and concordance index (C-index). Three hundred and eighty-one patients from SEER database were eligible. The median disease specific OS was 9.0months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-10.7months). Multivariate Cox analysis identified seven independent prognostic factors including histological type, differentiation grade, T stage of primary tumor, CEA level, systemic chemotherapy, combined with liver metastasis and combined with lung metastasis. A novel nomogram was established based on these variables. In the internal validation, the C-index (0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.75) and calibration curve indicated well performance of this nomogram at predicting survival outcome in bone metastatic CRC. In the external validation, the C-index was 0.57 (95% CI 0.46-0.68). The prognosis of synchronous bone metastatic CRC is very poor. Histological type, differentiation grade, T stage of primary tumor, CEA level, systemic chemotherapy, combined with liver metastasis and combined with lung metastasis are independent prognostic factors. Further study is warranted to confirm the practicality of the prognostic nomogram.

KRAS Codon 12 Mutation is Associated with More Aggressive Invasiveness in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Retrospective Research.

ObjectiveTo investigate the connection between mutant KRAS/NRAS/BRAF and clinicopathological characteristics in therapy-naïve synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Chinese populations when compared with all wild type (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild type).Patients and MethodsA total of 200 patients with therapy-naïve synchronous mCRC (TNM stage: TanyNanyM1) were retrospectively collected as study objects. Primary tumor tissues from 200 mCRC patients were analyzed through next-generation sequencing panel to assess the mutated regions of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF.ResultsThe distribution frequency of gene mutation in our study was 41% KRAS, 4% NRAS, 11.5% BRAF, 0.5% both KRAS and BRAF. Tumors with any gene mutations (any gene mutations in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF), KRAS and KRAS codon 12 mutation were more likely to be located in right-sided colon (P=0.007, P=0.008, P=0.026, respectively). For metastasis, tumors with any gene mutations, KRAS and KRAS codon 12 mutation were significantly correlated with peritoneal metastasis (P=0.019, P=0.017, P=0.014, respectively), liver-peritoneum metastases (P=0.004, P=0.003, P=0.002, respectively) and multi-organ metastases (P=0.002, P=0.008, P=0.001, respectively). Tumors with all wild type were significantly correlated with distant lymph node-only metastasis. No statistically significant differences were found between clinicopathological characteristics and KRAS codon 13 and NRAS mutations.ConclusionOur study suggests that clinicopathological characteristics (specifically for metastasis) are related to KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in therapy-naïve synchronous mCRC population in China. We demonstrated that distant lymph node-only metastasis is visibly linked to all wild-type tumors. We found that patients with any gene mutations, KRAS mutation are more likely to carry peritoneal metastasis, liver-peritoneum metastases and multi-organ metastases than those with all wild type. After stratification, KRAS codon 12 mutation, but not codon 13 mutation, was remarkably associated with peritoneal metastasis, liver-peritoneum metastases, and multi-organ metastases compared to all wild type. These results may be useful for aiding in the prediction of prognosis and choosing the appropriate regimens for therapy.

Survival outcome of palliative primary tumor resection for colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver and/or lung metastases: A retrospective cohort study in the SEER database by propensity score matching analysis.

There is a great matter of controversies whether some of these synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer patients can benefit from palliative primary tumor resection (pPTR) and there is still no reported randomized control trial to address this issue. Patients with microscopically proven metastatic colorectal cancer were identified within the SEER database (2010-2016). Patients were propensity matched 1:1 into pPTR and non-surgery groups and among the matched cohort, the univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to identify predictors of survival. Median survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 21,405 colorectal cancer patients diagnosed with synchronous liver and/or lung metastases, 7386 were identified in the matched cohort. The median overall survival was 12.0 months, 22.0 months in the non-surgery, surgery groups, respectively (p<0.001) and the corresponding median cancer-specific survival was 13.0 months, 22.0 months, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that surgery was independently associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.531) as well as cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.516). In stratified analyses by primary site and patterns of distant metastases, those patients with pPTR had better prognosis. In addition, stratified analysis revealed that trimodality therapy was linked with the greatest therapeutic effect followed by addition of chemotherapy to pPTR. pPTR may offer some therapeutic benefits among carefully selected patients, and surgery-based multimodality therapy was associated with better survival.