Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

MSH2-Mutated Lynch Syndrome With 9 Synchronous Colon and Rectum Adenocarcinomas: An Extremely Rare Case Report

Synchronous colorectal carcinoma is having more than 1 primary carcinoma detected in a single patient at the same time or within 6 months of tumor diagnosis. Metachronous colorectal carcinoma is the presence of more than 1 primary carcinoma detected consecutively in a single person after a set time interval. Patients with Lynch syndrome and Muir-Torre syndrome (a subset of Lynch syndrome) inherit a germline mutation in 1 of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma have a higher proportion of MMR-mutated cancers than patients with solitary colorectal carcinoma. Most studies in the literature indicate that patients with synchronous colorectal cancers typically have only 2 carcinomas. However, there have been reports of a single patient having up to 6 synchronous carcinomas in the large intestine. This report discusses a patient with 9 simultaneous colorectal cancers at the initial diagnosis, along with a history of bladder cancer, sebaceous adenoma, and duodenal adenoma, associated with a germline mutS homolog 2 ( MSH2) mutation. Additionally, the report explores various aspects of having synchronous colorectal cancers. More studies are needed to clarify the clinicopathologic and molecular landscape of these rare tumors and identify the best management and treatment strategies for these patients.

Prognostic assessment of T-cells in primary colorectal cancer and paired synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis.

Prognostic value of T-cells between primary colorectal cancer (pCRC) and its paired synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis (LM) is underinvestigated and is the subject of the present study. We enrolled into this retrospective cohort study patients, who underwent resection of both pCRC and synchronous LM (N = 55) or metachronous LM (N = 44). After immunohistochemical staining for CD3+, CD8+, and CD45R0+ whole slides were scanned and T-cell densities were quantified using QuPath software in tumor center (TC), inner margin (IM), outer margin (OM), and peritumor zone (PT) of pCRC and LM. High densities of CD8+ T-cells in TC, OM and PT of synchronous LM were associated with longer disease-free survival (DFS). Greater densities of CD3+ T-cells in IM and PT and CD8+ T-cells in IM, OM and PT in synchronous LM over pCRC were associated with longer DFS. Greater densities of CD8+ T-cells in the TC and IM and CD3+ T-cells in the IM of pCRC were found in the metachronous over synchronous group. The first novel finding demonstrated that high density of CD8+ T cells in synchronous LM were associated with favorable outcome. The second finding of high CD8+ cell density in pCRC in metachronous over synchronous CRC may provide a mechanistic basis for the delay of metastatic spread. Both findings could be applied clinically with own reference values.

Clinical features, surgical treatment strategy, and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for synchronous and metachronous multiple colorectal cancers: A 14-year single-center experience.

Patients with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of developing secondary synchronous/metachronous CRCs. The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for multiple CRCs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS in patients with multiple CRCs and elucidate their clinical characteristics. This retrospective study reviewed CRC patients who underwent MIS between 2010 and 2023. Multiple CRC cases were categorized into synchronous and metachronous cohorts. Demographics, pathological findings, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed as appropriate. A total of 1,272 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 99 (7.8%) having multiple CRCs (75 synchronous and 24 metachronous). Multiple CRC patients had a higher prevalence of strong family history (8.1% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and right-sided colon cancer (55.6% vs. 34.4%, P < 0.001) compared to solitary CRC patients. MSI-high/MMR-deficient status, including Lynch syndrome, was frequently observed among patients with multiple CRCs. Synchronous CRCs requiring double-anastomosis were associated with longer operation times (P = 0.03) and increased blood loss (P = 0.03) compared to those with a single-anastomosis. In the metachronous cohort, repeat operation patterns were categorized based on tumor location and sacrificed arteries. Preservation of the left-colic artery avoided extended colectomy in some patients. Patients with multiple CRC involving rectal cancer had a higher anastomotic leakage (AL) rate (17.6% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.01); however, this difference in AL rate disappeared after PSM (8.8% vs. 8.8%, P = 1.0). In patients with multiple CRCs, AL has not been observed ever since the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was implemented. MIS is feasible for multiple CRCs, with perioperative outcomes comparable to those for solitary CRCs. Preservation of critical arteries may benefit patients at high risk of secondary CRCs, particularly those with a strong family history of CRC, right-sided tumors, or MSI-high/MMR-deficient profiles, including Lynch syndrome.

The KRAS G12D mutation increases the risk of unresectable recurrence of resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis.

Unresectable recurrence is a critical predictor of outcomes for colorectal cancer patients. We attempted to identify the prognostic factors, especially for unresectable recurrence-free survival (URFS) as a new endpoint, in patients with resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLOM). We investigated patients with resectable CRLOM, who underwent an R0 resection for both CRC and CRLOM between January, 2014 and March, 2019 at a single institution. The exclusion criteria were patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, the absence of data for genetic analyses, and the presence of multiple cancers, synchronous CRC, or familial adenomatous polyposis. The prognostic factors were examined retrospectively using data on pre-hepatectomy factors, including primary tumor molecular profiling results. We analyzed the data of 101 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for CRLOM. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS G12D mutation-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.69; p < 0.01), RYR2 mutation-positivity (HR: 4.03; p < 0.01), and KRAS G12S mutation-positivity (HR: 3.96; p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml before hepatectomy (HR: 3.62; p < 0.01), and primary tumor pN2 stage (HR: 3.22; p = 0.03) were significant predictors of the URFS. This is the first study to show that specific KRAS and RYR2 mutations were associated with the URFS.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of sporadic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 120 cases of sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer from July 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Patients with Lynch syndrome; synchronous multiple colorectal cancers; preoperative anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and those with incomplete follow-up information were excluded based on family history and next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results. Immunohistochemical stains were used to detect the expression of mismatch repair proteins, methylation-specific PCR for methylation testing, and fluorescent PCR for BRAF V600E gene mutation detection. The clinical and pathological data, and gene mutation status were analyzed. Follow-up was done to assess survival and prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival rate. Results: Sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer occurred more frequently in the right side of the colon, in females, and in the elderly. Morphologically, it was mostly moderately-differentiated, and most patients had low-grade tumor budding. In terms of immunohistochemical expression, MLH1 and PMS2 loss were dominant, and there were age and location-specificities in protein expression. MLH1 methylation was commonly detected in elderly female patients and rare in young male patients; while MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency, and BRAF V600E mutation occurred more often on the right side (P<0.05). The 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 90.7% and 88.7% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.8% and 90.7% respectively. Tumor budding status was an independent risk factor affecting patient recurrence (hazard ratio=3.375, 95% confidence interval: 1.060-10.741, P=0.039), patients with low-grade tumor budding had better prognosis, and those with medium or high-grade tumor budding had poor prognosis. Conclusion: For dMMR colorectal cancer patients, tumor budding status is an independent risk factor for recurrence.

Synchronous or metachronous breast and colorectal cancers in younger-than-average-age patients: a case series.

The incidence of breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) in younger-than-average-age patients is rising and poorly understood. This is the largest study on patients with both cancers who are less than 60 years old and aims to characterize demographic, clinicopathologic, and genetic features and describe therapeutic dilemmas and management strategies. This is a retrospective medical records review of patients at the University of California San Francisco with both primary breast and CRC before age 60. Fifty-one patients were identified; 41 had detailed medical records. Median age of diagnosis with breast cancer was 43 (range 27-59) and CRC was 50 (28-59). Most were Caucasian (38, 74.5%) and never smokers (23, 56.1%); about half were current alcohol consumers (20, 48.8%) and about one-third had sedentary jobs (14, 34.1%). Average BMI was 25.8 (range: 14-49), and 30% were overweight or obese. Breast was the first cancer diagnosed in 36 patients (70.6%) and 44 (86.3%) had a metachronous CRC diagnosis. Breast cancer was early stage (0-2) in 32 (78.0%) patients whereas CRC was split between early stage (1-2) in 14 (34.1%) and later stage (3-4) in 19 (46.2%). Ten patients (24.3%) had a known germline mutation, although 23 (56.1%) had a family history of cancer in a first-degree relative. Younger patients with both breast and CRC are a unique cohort, often without known risk factors. Alcohol consumption and sedentary jobs were the most common risk factors, and about one-quarter had a known genetic predisposition. Comanagement of both cancers requires individualized, multidisciplinary care.

Upfront resection versus no resection of the primary tumor in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomized phase III CAIRO4 study conducted by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group

Upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) has been associated with longer overall survival (OS) in patients with synchronous unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in retrospective analyses. The aim of the CAIRO4 study was to investigate whether the addition of upfront PTR to systemic therapy resulted in a survival benefit in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of their primary tumor. This randomized phase III trial was conducted in 45 hospitals in The Netherlands and Denmark. Eligibility criteria included previously untreated mCRC, unresectable metastases, and no severe symptoms of the primary tumor. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to upfront PTR followed by systemic therapy or systemic therapy without upfront PTR. Systemic therapy consisted of first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in both arms. Primary endpoint was OS in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01606098. Between August 2012 and February 2021, 206 patients were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 204 patients were included (n= 103 without upfront PTR, n= 101 with upfront PTR) of whom 116 were men (57%) with median age of 65 years (interquartile range 59-71 years). Median follow-up was 69.4 months. Median OS in the arm without upfront PTR was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval 16.0-22.2 months) compared with 20.1 months (95% confidence interval 17.0-25.1 months) in the upfront PTR arm (P= 0.32). The number of grade 3-4 events was 71 (72%) in the arm without upfront PTR and 61 (65%) in the upfront PTR arm (P= 0.33). Three deaths (3%) possibly related to treatment were reported in the arm without upfront PTR and four (4%) in the upfront PTR arm. Addition of upfront PTR to palliative systemic therapy in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of the primary tumor does not result in a survival benefit. This practice should no longer be considered standard of care.

Mexican physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards hereditary colorectal cancer risk management.

e22552 Background: Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) has become an integral component of the management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding clinical criteria and interpreting screening tests to identify patients who should be prioritized for genetic testing is especially critical in resource-constrained settings such as Mexico, where access to genetic testing is limited. Methods: We designed a self-applicable survey consisting of 18 items, divided into three sections: 7 on knowledge, 5 on clinical approaches, and 6 on access to genetic testing. The aim was to assess the practice patterns of Mexican physicians in contact with patients at risk for hereditary CRC. Initially, the survey was piloted among oncology fellows to refine and improve its relevance and applicability. Following adjustments, it was disseminated using a QR code at the annual meeting of the Mexican Society of Oncology (SMeO) in September 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed using frequency and proportions for categorical variables and median and range for quantitative variables. Results: A total of 78 physicians completed the survey, with a median age of 37 years (range, 27-70). Among them, 47.2% were female, 82% were medical oncologists, with a median practice duration of 6 years (range, 1- 40). 52.6% practice in cancer community centers, 83.4% were employed in public primary care settings, and 60% were affiliated to academic centers. Referral criteria for GCRA was identified correctly in 66.7% who recognized age at CRC diagnosis &lt; 50 years, 57.7% synchronous or metachronous CRC, 50% deficient mismatch repair CRC, and 37.2% PREMM5 score of ≥2.5%. Lynch syndrome, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), and Cowden syndrome were identified as syndromes with an increased CRC risk by 76.9%, 71.8% and 56.7% of respondents, respectively. Decision-making based on likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants was indicated by 26.9% and 69.2%, while 12.8% reported making decisions based on variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Regarding clinical approach, 74.4% inquired about a family history of cancer at the initial consultation, and 66.7% referred patients for genetic counseling. The primary obstacles to accessing GCRA were the cost of genetic testing (43.6%) and the absence of medical genetics services at their centers (39.7%). Only 23% reported the availability of cascade testing within their practice. Conclusions: The identification of patients at risk of hereditary CRC was suboptimal among Mexican physicians. A high proportion of respondents were not fully qualified to interpret correctly genetic testing results. These indicate a need for awareness and educational programs to improve providers’ knowledge on predisposition cancer syndromes.

The CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Status in Synchronous and Solitary Primary Colorectal Cancers: Prognosis and Effective Therapeutic Drug Prediction.

Synchronous colorectal cancer (sCRC) is characterized by the occurrence of more than one tumor within six months of detecting the first tumor. Evidence suggests that sCRC might be more common in the serrated neoplasia pathway, marked by the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), than in the chromosomal instability pathway (CIN). An increasing number of studies propose that CIMP could serve as a potential epigenetic predictor or prognostic biomarker of sCRC. Therapeutic drugs already used for treating CIMP-positive colorectal cancers (CRCs) are reviewed and drug selections for sCRC patients are discussed.

Prognostic Significance of Synchronous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

To determine the prognostic significance of the synchronous colorectal cancer (S-CRC) on survival and recurrence rate. Authors conducted an analysis of 90 colorectal adenocarcinoma patients who received a curative (R0) resection with a full course of standard adjuvant treatment. A total of 45 patients diagnosed with S-CRC at the time of initial presentation were individually matched to a group of 45 solitary CRC patients in pair at a ratio of 1:1. The case-matched criteria included age (± 5 years), gender, tumor location, and tumor stage. For S-CRC, the most advanced pathologic lesion was defined as the index lesion, and the matching cancer stage was categorized according to the index lesion. The N-stage was determined based on all lymph nodes. There were a higher number of retrieved nodes in patients with S-CRC than those with solitary CRC. The median (min, max) of the total number of retrieved nodes for S-CRC was 18 (3, 53) nodes, compared to 14 (4, 45) nodes for solitary CRC (p < 0.01). All patients were without distant metastasis (stage I to III). The total accumulative number of patients experiencing tumor recurrence was 9 (20%) amongst the solitary CRC patients and 18 (40%) amongst the S-CRC patients at the 15-year surveillance period (p<0.05). The disease-free survival (DFS) (mean + SD) was 147.6 + 9.3 months in the solitary CRC group, compared to 110.5 + 11.7 months in the S-CRC group (p<0.05). Amongst S-CRC patients, those having primary and synchronous tumors located across anatomical segments had poorer DFS (70.5 months) and higher 15-year tumor recurrence rate (17.8%) than those with all tumors in the same or contiguous anatomical segments. In addition, the S-CRC patients with all tumors located in contiguous segment had a longer DFS (123.7 months) than the other types of anatomical correlation. Patients with S-CRC had worse prognosis than those with solitary CRC. For S-CRC, the anatomical correlation between the primary and the synchronous tumors may influence DFS and recurrence rate.

Associations between pathological features and risk of metachronous colorectal cancer.

Survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing another primary colorectal cancer - metachronous CRC. Understanding which pathological features of the first tumour are associated with risk of metachronous CRC might help tailor existing surveillance guidelines. Population-based CRC cases were recruited from the United States, Canada and Australia between 1997 and 2012 and followed prospectively until 2022 by the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Metachronous CRC was defined as a new primary CRC diagnosed at least 1 year after the initial CRC. Those with the genetic cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome or MUTYH mutation carriers were excluded. Cox regression models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations. Of 6085 CRC cases, 138 (2.3%) were diagnosed with a metachronous CRC over a median follow-up time of 12 years (incidence: 2.0 per 1000 person-years). CRC cases with a synchronous CRC were 3.4-fold more likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.89-5.98) than those without a synchronous tumour. CRC cases with MMR-deficient tumours had a 72% increased risk of metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11-2.64) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumours. Compared to cases who had an adenocarcinoma histologic type, those with an undifferentiated histologic type were 77% less likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.94). Existing surveillance guidelines for CRC survivors could be updated to include increased surveillance for those whose first CRC was diagnosed with a synchronous CRC or was MMR-deficient.

Successful multidisciplinary treatment for synchronous advanced esophageal and cecal cancers after total gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal interposition

BackgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma is characterized by field cancerization, wherein multiple cancers occur in the esophagus, head and neck, and stomach. Synchronous esophageal and colorectal cancers are also encountered with a certain frequency. A good prognosis can be expected if the tumors in both locations can be safely and completely removed. For patients with multiple cancers that occur simultaneously with esophageal cancer, it is necessary to perform a staged operation, taking into consideration the associated surgical invasiveness. It is also necessary to select multidisciplinary treatment depending on the degree of progression of the multiple lesions. We report our rare experience with a staged operation for a patient with synchronous advanced cancers of the esophagus and cecum who had previously undergone total gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal interposition for gastric cancer.Case presentationA 71-year-old man with a history of reconstruction by jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy was diagnosed as having multiple synchronous esophageal and cecal cancers. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we performed a planned two-stage operation, with esophagectomy and jejunostomy in the first stage and ileocecal resection and jejunal reconstruction with vascular anastomosis in the second. Postoperatively, the patient was relieved without major complications, and both tumors were amenable to curative pathologic resection.ConclusionsOur procedure reported here may be recommended as an option for staged resection and reconstruction in patients with simultaneous advanced esophageal and cecal cancer after total gastrectomy.

ALPPS in synchronous colorectal cancer in times of COVID-19

ALPPS in synchronous colorectal cancer in times of COVID-19

Clinical profile of 1208 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients in Tamil Nadu-A multi-centric survey.

An increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is being reported in developing countries, including India. Most Indian studies on CRC are retrospective and single-centered. The present study is an attempt to understand the current clinical profile and stage of newly diagnosed CRCs across multiple centers in Tamil Nadu, India. A multi-centric observational survey was conducted between September 1,2021, and August 31,2022, under the aegis of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology - Tamil Nadu chapter. Patients 18 years of age and older with a recent diagnosis of CRC fulfilling the inclusion criteria were prospectively recruited at the participating centers. Their demographic, clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, histopathologic, radiologic and risk factor details were systematically collected and analyzed. Across 23 centers in Tamil Nadu, 1208 patients were recruited. The male:female ratio was 1.49:1, while mean (SD) age was 57.7 (13.5) years. A majority (81.9%) were Tamils and 78.5% belonged to lower socioeconomicclasses. The predominant symptoms were hematochezia (30.2%) and a change in bowel habits (27.5%). The most common locations were the rectum (34.3%) and rectosigmoid (15.1%). Synchronous CRCs were seen in 3.3% and synchronous colorectal polyps in 12.8%. Predisposing factors for CRC were seen in 2%. A past history of any cancer among CRC patients was obtained in 3.1% and a family history of any cancer was found in 7.6%. Patients who were either overweight or obese constituted 46.4% of the study population. At presentation, the predominant stages were stage III (44.7%) and stage IV (20.8%). A majority of patients with newly diagnosed CRC in Tamil Nadu belonged to the lower socioeconomicclasses. About 60% had CRCs located within the reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope. Two-thirds of the patients exceeded stage II disease at presentation. Not applicable.

Clinical study on simultaneous resection of liver metastases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis

PurposeThis study aimed to analyze the clinical effect of simultaneous resection of liver metastases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis. MethodsA total of 144 patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis who were admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and January 2019 were randomly assigned into a control group and an intervention group. The patients in the control group received simultaneous resection of liver metastases. The patients in the intervention group obtained simultaneous resection of liver metastases combined with HIPEC. The recent total effective rate of the 2 groups was compared, and the disease control rate of the 2 groups was calculated at 3 months after treatment. The patients were followed up for 3 years. The survival time of the 2 groups was observed and compared. Fasting venous blood was collected from patients in the 2 groups, and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was compared. The level of quality of life scale (Short Form 36-item Health Survey) and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe R0 complete resection rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < .05). The recent total effective rate in the intervention group (87.50%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (59.72%) (P < .05). The negative change of CEA in the intervention group was 72.22%, which was prominently higher than that in the control group of 43.06% (χ2 = 12.542, P < .001). After a 36-month follow-up, the overall survival rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.05–5.48; P < .001). The patients in the intervention group had significantly higher life quality scores of health status, social function, emotional function, physical function, and mental health than in the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups (P > .05). Age > 60 years, preoperative comorbidities, moderate and high differentiation of tumors, intraoperative blood loss > 150 mL, and less experienced surgeons were risk factors affecting the occurrence of complications after treatment and were closely correlated with the prognosis and survival of patients (P < .05). Patients with age ≤ 60 years, no preoperative comorbidities, low tumor differentiation, intraoperative blood loss ≤ 150 mL, more experienced surgeons, and complete R0 resection had a longer survival time. Age > 60 years, preoperative comorbidities, moderate and high differentiation of tumors, intraoperative blood loss > 150 mL, and less experienced surgeons were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (P < .05), whereas R0 surgery was an independent protective factor for the prognosis (P < .05). ConclusionIn the treatment of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases, simultaneous resection of liver metastases in conjunction with HIPEC demonstrated superior efficacy. This approach may potentially extend patient survival and enhance quality of life and deserve to be extensively used in clinical practice.

Simultaneous Resection for Colorectal and Liver Metastases, new equipment and personalized medicine.

Nowadays we perform synchronous colorectal cancer resection along with synchronous liver metastases. We investigated whether colon resection first is safer than liver resection first and if simultaneous surgeries are in general safe. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients were included in our multicenter study. In our study patients had simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases. The patients included were divided into two groups based on their first surgery. Group A had colon resection first (n = 10) and group B had liver resection first (n = 10). All adverse effects and outcomes were compared after the first day of hospitalization. Results: The only difference between the two groups was the operative blood loss. It was observed to be less in group B. Conclusion: In our study we did not observe any significant difference regarding the order of the operation.

Analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancers

Analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancers

Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Upfront Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab: A Pooled Analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 Studies.

The decision to resect or not the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and challenging issue for oncologists, especially when an antiangiogenic-based therapy is planned. Patients enrolled in the phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies that compared upfront FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + bevacizumab, respectively, were included. We assessed the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR), rate of grade > 2 adverse events (AEs), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs in the overall population and according to the treatment arm. Of the 999 patients included, 513 (51%) underwent PTR at baseline. Longer PFS and OS were observed in resected patients compared to those with unresected primary tumors: 11.2 vs. 10.0 months (p < 0.001) and 26.6 vs. 22.5 (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate models, PTR was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for better PFS (p = 0.032) and OS (p = 0.018). Patients with PTR experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (p = 0.055) and lower incidence of anemia (p = 0.053), perforation (p = 0.015), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted in incidence of bleeding (p = 0.39). The benefit of FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in terms of PFS (p for interaction: 0.46), OS (p for interaction: 0.80), ORR (p for interaction: 0.36), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was independent of PTR. PTR at baseline was independently associated with good prognosis in synchronous mCRC patients and with lower incidence of serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs during upfront chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The benefit and toxicity profile of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was independent of PTR.

Features of synchronous and metachronous dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND Studies evaluating the characteristics of dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer (CRC) (DPGCC) are limited. AIM To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with DPGCC. METHODS From October 2010 to August 2021, patients with DPGCC were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with DPGCC were divided into two groups (synchronous and metachronous). We compared the overall survival (OS) between the groups using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox’s proportional hazards model to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS Of the 76 patients with DPGCC, 46 and 30 had synchronous and metachronous cancers, respectively. The proportion of unresectable CRC in patients with synchronous cancers was higher than that in patients with metachronous cancers (28.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.015). The majority of the second primary cancers had occurred within 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with metachronous cancers had a better prognosis than patients with synchronous cancers (P = 0.010). The patients who had undergone gastrectomy (P &lt; 0.001) or CRC resection (P &lt; 0.001) had a better prognosis than those who had not. In the multivariate analysis, synchronous cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 6.8, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.0-22.7, P = 0.002)] and stage III-IV gastric cancer (GC) [HR = 10.0, 95%CI: 3.4-29.5, P &lt; 0.001)] were risk prognostic factor for OS, while patients who underwent gastrectomy was a protective prognostic factor for OS [HR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, P = 0.002]. CONCLUSION Regular surveillance for metachronous cancer is necessary during postoperative follow-up. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy to improve the prognosis of DPGCC. The prognosis appears to be influenced by the stage of GC rather than the stage of CRC. Patients with synchronous cancer have a worse prognosis, and its treatment strategy is worth further exploration.

Factors Affecting the Survival of Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Little is known about Indonesian metastatic CRC patients’ survival and prognostic factors, although this malignancy is one the most frequent cancer in the country. We aimed to investigate the survival outcome and the factors influencing local CRC patients presenting with a metastatic stage at diagnosis.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done on 441 data of synchronous metastatic CRC cases treated between January 2016 and December 2019 at Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Secondary data were collected from the CRC clinical registry database. Demographic, clinicopathology and the type of treatment were collected. Survival staus was obtained from the registry database and communication to patients or caring families. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the overall survival (O.S). The Cox proportional hazards regression mode was applied to analyzethe potential factors affecting survival. Results: The median follow up of the recent study was 17 months, The median overall survival was 13 months. Two-year overall survival was 37% and the estimated 5-year overall survival was 16.1%. Multivariate cox analyses identified poor performance status (HR 2.639, 95% CI 1.438-4.842, p = 0.002), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (HR 2.795, 95% CI 1.509-5.176, p = 0.001) and higher histological grade (HR 2.019, 95% CI 1.112-3.667, p = 0.021) were associated with poorer overall.Conclusion: Poor performance status, high CEA level, and higher histological grade as factors that were associated with unfavourable overall survival of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.