Number Of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Research Articles

Regulation of different phases of AMPA receptor intracellular transport by 4.1N and SAP97

Changes in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors underlie many forms of synaptic plasticity. These variations are controlled by an interplay between their intracellular transport (IT), export to the plasma membrane (PM), stabilization at synapses, and recycling. The cytosolic C-terminal domain of the AMPAR GluA1 subunit is specifically associated with 4.1 N and SAP97. We analyze how interactions between GluA1 and 4.1N or SAP97 regulate IT and exocytosis in basal conditions and after cLTP induction. The down-regulation of 4.1N or SAP97 decreases GluA1 IT properties and export to the PM. The total deletion of its C-terminal fully suppresses its IT. Our results demonstrate that during basal transmission, the binding of 4.1N to GluA1 allows their exocytosis whereas the interaction with SAP97 is essential for GluA1 IT. During cLTP, the interaction of 4.1N with GluA1 allows its IT and exocytosis. Our results identify the differential roles of 4.1N and SAP97 in the control of various phases of GluA1 IT.

Mechanisms of AMPA Receptor Endosomal Sorting.

The regulation of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs) is critical for excitatory synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity and the consequent formation of neural circuits during brain development and their modification during learning and memory processes. The number of synaptic AMPARs is regulated through endocytosis, exocytosis and endosomal sorting that results in recycling back to the plasma membrane or degradation in the lysosome. Hence, endo-lysosomal sorting is vitally important in maintaining AMPAR expression at the synapse, and the dynamic regulation of these trafficking events is a key component of synaptic plasticity. A reduction in synaptic strength such as in long-term depression (LTD) involves AMPAR sorting to lysosomes to reduce synaptic AMPAR number, whereas long-term potentiation (LTP) involves an increase in AMPAR recycling to increase the number of AMPARs at synapses. Here, we review our current understanding of the endosomal trafficking routes taken by AMPARs, and the mechanisms involved in AMPAR endosomal sorting, focussing on the numerous AMPAR associated proteins that have been implicated in this complex process. We also discuss how these events are dysregulated in brain disorders.

LTD expression is independent of glutamate receptor subtype.

Long-term depression (LTD) is a form of synaptic plasticity that plays a major role in the activity-dependent reshaping of synaptic transmission. LTD is expressed as a decrease in synaptic AMPA receptor number, though the exact mechanism remains controversial. Several lines of evidence have suggested necessary roles for both the GluA1 and GluA2 subunits, and specifically certain interactions with their cytoplasmic tails. However, it is unclear if either GluA1 or GluA2 are absolutely required for LTD. We tested this hypothesis using constitutive knock-outs and single-cell molecular replacement of AMPA receptor subunits in mouse hippocampus. We found that neither GluA1 or GluA2 are required for normal expression of LTD, and indeed a normal decrease in synaptic transmission was observed in cells in which all endogenous AMPA receptors have been replaced by kainate receptors. Thus, LTD does not require removal of specific AMPA receptor subunits, but likely involves a more general modification of the synapse and its ability to anchor a broad range of receptor proteins.

Initial state of single spines affects probability of induction of cerebellar long term depression in a stochastic model

Cerebellar long-term depression (LTD) is a type of synaptic plasticity which shows a robust and persistent decrease in the synaptic transmission between parallel fibers (PF) and Purkinje cells (PC), expressed as a reduction in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors. Our lab recently developed a stochastic model of the LTD signaling network, including a PKC-ERK-cPLA2 positive feedback loop and mechanisms of AMPAR trafficking, and tuned the model to replicate calcium uncaging experiments [1]. Probabilistically, signaling activity switches between two discrete stable states (LTD or non-LTD). In single spines, the probability of LTD occurrence is only modulated by the concentration and duration of the signal used to trigger it, and inputs with the same magnitude give rise to one of two responses. The detailed kinetic model of the signaling and trafficking network involved in the induction of cerebellar LTD was developed based on extensive experimental data. The model was solved stochastically and deterministically using STEPS (http://steps.sourceforge.net/), a well validated simulator that implements the Stochastic Simulation Algorithm (SSA)[2]. The reasons for the bistable behavior in single spines is not fully understood. Molecular memory of the compartment, i.e. initial state of molecules before calcium injection, may play a role in altering the probability of a spine to undergo LTD induction or not. We address the possible effects of this initial state on the observed bistable behavior quantitatively. Preliminary analysis of these initial conditions for several simulations lead to their categorization on the basis of LTD probability observed for a particular calcium concentration and pulse duration (for simplicity we named them as High LTD likelihood, Normal LTD likelihood and Low LTD likelihood). We then confirmed these categories for different calcium conditions. The probability of LTD induction has a dependence on calcium pulse duration well-described by the Hill equation. The High and Normal LTD likelihood cases showed similar characteristics, though the Low LTD likelihood category showed different Hill parameters and also didn't saturate at 100 percent. Observations when varying the time before calcium input showed that the High and Normal LTD likelihood states exist only on the order of minutes and dissipate afterwards. In depth understanding of these different initial states may give better insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms causing bistable behavior. This is an important phenomena, as it is also observed in other forms of long-term synaptic plasticity and in many other biological processes.

SUMOylation, Arc and the regulation homeostatic synaptic scaling

Neurons compensate for changes in network activity by altering the sensitivity of transmission across collections of synapses by up- or downregulating the number of synaptic AMPA receptors. We recently reported that, in parallel to increasing AMPA receptor surface expression, suppression of network activity with TTX increases protein SUMOylation by decreasing levels of the deSUMOylating enzyme SENP1. SUMOylation of the immediate early gene product Arc is required for synaptic scaling. These results reveal a previously unsuspected role for protein SUMOylation in activity-dependent AMPA receptor trafficking and the regulation of neuronal network activity, processes which play important roles in neurodegenerative disease.

A Stochastic Signaling Network Mediates the Probabilistic Induction of Cerebellar Long-Term Depression

Many cellular processes involve a small number of molecules and undergo stochastic fluctuations in their levels of activity. Cerebellar long-term depression (LTD) is a form of synaptic plasticity expressed as a reduction in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in Purkinje cells. We developed a stochastic model of the LTD signaling network, including a PKC-ERK-cPLA(2) positive feedback loop and mechanisms of AMPAR trafficking, and tuned the model to replicate calcium uncaging experiments. The signaling network activity in single synapses switches between two discrete stable states (LTD and non-LTD) in a probabilistic manner. The stochasticity of the signaling network causes threshold dithering and allows at the macroscopic level for many different and stable mean magnitudes of depression. The probability of LTD occurrence in a single spine is only modulated by the concentration and duration of the signal used to trigger it, and inputs with the same magnitude can give rise to two different responses; there is no threshold for the input signal. The stochasticity is intrinsic to the signaling network and not mostly dependent on noise in the calcium input signal, as has been suggested previously. The activities of the ultrasensitive ERK and of cPLA(2) undergo strong stochastic fluctuations. Conversely, PKC, which acts as a noise filter, is more constantly activated. Systematic variation of the biochemical population size demonstrates that threshold dithering and the absence of spontaneous LTD depend critically on the number of molecules in a spine, indicating constraints on spine size in Purkinje cells.

Glutamate Receptor δ2 Is Essential for Input Pathway-Dependent Regulation of Synaptic AMPAR Contents in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells

The number of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs) is the major determinant of synaptic strength and is differently regulated in input pathway-dependent and target cell type-dependent manners. In cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs), the density of synaptic AMPARs is approximately five times lower at parallel fiber (PF) synapses than at climbing fiber (CF) synapses. However, molecular mechanisms underlying this biased synaptic distribution remain unclear. As a candidate molecule, we focused on glutamate receptor δ2 (GluRδ2 or GluD2), which is known to be efficiently trafficked to and selectively expressed at PF synapses in PCs. We applied postembedding immunogold electron microscopy to GluRδ2 knock-out (KO) and control mice, and measured labeling density for GluA1-4 at three excitatory synapses in the cerebellar molecular layer. In both control and GluRδ2-KO mice, GluA1-3 were localized at PF and CF synapses in PCs, while GluA2-4 were at PF synapses in interneurons. In control mice, labeling density for each of GluA1-3 was four to six times lower at PF-PC synapses than at CF-PC synapses. In GluRδ2-KO mice, however, their labeling density displayed a three- to fivefold increase at PF synapses, but not at CF synapses, thus effectively eliminating input pathway-dependent disparity between the two PC synapses. Furthermore, we found an unexpected twofold increase in labeling density for GluA2 and GluA3, but not GluA4, at PF-interneuron synapses, where we identified low but significant expression of GluRδ2. These results suggest that GluRδ2 is involved in a common mechanism that restricts the number of synaptic AMPARs at PF synapses in PCs and molecular layer interneurons.

Potentiation of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Induced by the Deletion of NMDA Receptors Requires the GluA2 Subunit

Deletion of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) early in development results in an increase in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs), suggesting a role for NMDARs in negatively regulating AMPAR trafficking at developing synapses. Substantial evidence has shown that AMPAR subunits function differentially in AMPAR trafficking. However, the role of AMPAR subunits in the enhancement of AMPARs following NMDAR ablation remains unknown. We have now performed single-cell genetic deletions in double-floxed mice in which the deletion of GluN1 is combined with the deletion of GluA1 or GluA2. We find that the AMPAR enhancement following NMDAR deletion requires the GluA2 subunit, but not the GluA1 subunit, indicating a key role for GluA2 in the regulation of AMPAR trafficking in developing synapses.

Autoinactivation of Neuronal AMPA Receptors via Glutamate-Regulated TARP Interaction

Neuronal AMPA receptors autoinactivate at high concentrations of glutamate, i.e., the current declines at glutamate concentrations above 10-100 microM. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unclear. Stargazin-like TARPs are AMPA receptor auxiliary subunits that modulate receptor trafficking and channel properties. Here, we found that neuronal AMPA receptors and recombinant AMPA receptors coexpressed with stargazin autoinactivate at high concentrations of glutamate, whereas recombinant AMPA receptors expressed alone do not. The reduction of currents at high glutamate concentrations is not associated with a reduction of AMPA receptor number, but rather with the loss of stargazin-associated allosteric modulation of channel gating. We show that receptor desensitization promotes the dissociation of TARP-AMPA receptor complexes in a few milliseconds. This dissociation mechanism contributes to synaptic short-term modulation. The results demonstrate a mechanism for dynamic regulation of AMPA receptor activity to tune synaptic strength.

Activity Bidirectionally Regulates AMPA Receptor mRNA Abundance in Dendrites of Hippocampal Neurons

Activity-dependent regulation of synaptic AMPA receptor (AMPAR) number is critical to NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent synaptic plasticity. Using quantitative high-resolution in situ hybridization, we show that mRNAs encoding the AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunits (GluRs) 1 and 2 are localized to dendrites of hippocampal neurons and are regulated by paradigms that alter synaptic efficacy. A substantial fraction of synaptic sites contain AMPAR mRNA, consistent with strategic positioning and availability for "on-site" protein synthesis. NMDAR activation depletes dendritic levels of AMPAR mRNAs. The decrease in mRNA occurs via rise in intracellular Ca2+, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, and transcriptional arrest at the level of the nucleus. The decrease in mRNA is accompanied by a long-lasting reduction in synaptic AMPAR number, consistent with reduced synaptic efficacy. In contrast, group I metabotropic GluR signaling promotes microtubule-based trafficking of existing AMPAR mRNAs from the soma to dendrites. Bidirectional regulation of dendritic mRNA abundance represents a potentially powerful means to effect long-lasting changes in synaptic strength.

Auxiliary Subunits Assist AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors

Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, acts primarily on two types of ionotropic receptors: alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Work over the past decade indicates that regulated changes in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors may serve as a mechanism for information storage. Recent studies demonstrate that a family of small transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) controls both AMPA receptor trafficking and channel gating. TARPs provide the first example of auxiliary subunits of ionotropic receptors. Here we review the pivotal role that TARPs play in the life cycle of AMPA receptors.

Dynamic interaction of stargazin-like TARPs with cycling AMPA receptors at synapses.

Activity-dependent plasticity in the brain arises in part from changes in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors. Synaptic trafficking of AMPA receptors is controlled by stargazin and homologous transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs). We found that TARPs were stable at the plasma membrane, whereas AMPA receptors were internalized in a glutamate-regulated manner. Interaction with AMPA receptors involved both extra- and intracellular determinants of TARPs. Upon binding to glutamate, AMPA receptors detached from TARPs. This did not require ion flux or intracellular second messengers. This allosteric mechanism for AMPA receptor dissociation from TARPs may participate in glutamate-mediated internalization of receptors in synaptic plasticity.

Postsynaptic Modulation of AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Responses and LTP by the Type 3 Ryanodine Receptor

The precise function of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in synaptic transmission is unknown, but three of their subtypes are expressed in the brain. We examined the roleof RyRs in excitatory synaptic transmission in hippocampalslices, using type 3 RyR (RyR3)-deficient mice. The α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxozolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor-mediated basal synaptic responses in the CA1 region of mutant mice were smaller than those of wild-type mice, while there wasno difference in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated responses, suggesting selective postsynaptic modification of AMPA receptors by RyR3. The expression of synaptic AMPA receptor subunits examined by Western blotting or immunohistochemistry was indistinguishable,suggesting that the smaller AMPA synaptic responses in mutant mice were not due tothe reduced number of synaptic AMPA receptors. Although the initial potentiation following tetanic stimulation of afferent fibers was similar, long-term potentiation (LTP) was smaller in mutant mice. There were no differences in presynaptic electrophysiological properties. We thus conclude that RyR3 postsynaptically regulates the properties of AMPA receptors and LTP.