Symptomatic Neuromas Research Articles

Neuroma morphology: A macroscopic classification system.

Neuromas come in different shapes and sizes; yet the correlation between neuroma morphology and symptomatology is unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate macroscopic traits of excised human neuromas and assess the validity of a morphological classification system and its potential clinical implications. End-neuroma specimens were collected from prospectively enrolled patients undergoing symptomatic neuroma surgery. Protocolized images of the specimens were obtained intraoperatively. Pain data (Numeric rating scale, 0-10) were prospectively collected during preoperative interview, patient demographic and comorbidity factors were collected from chart review. A morphological classification is proposed, and the inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed. Distribution of neuroma morphology with patient factors, was described. Forty-five terminal neuroma specimens from 27 patients were included. Residual limb patients comprised 93% of the population, of which 2 were upper (8.0%) and 23 (92.0%) were lower extremity residual limb patients. The proposed morphological classification, consisting of three groups (bulbous, fusiform, atypical), demonstrated a strong IRR (Cohen's kappa = 0.8). Atypical neuromas demonstrated higher preoperative pain, compared with bulbous and fusiform. Atypical morphology was more prevalent in patients with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. A validated morphological classification of neuroma is introduced. These findings may assist surgeons and researchers with better understanding of symptomatic neuroma development and their clinical implications. The potential relationship of neuroma morphology with the vascular and metabolic microenvironment requires further investigation.

Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What's the Best Recipe?

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management. We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared. Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management. In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management. Level IV retrospective case series.

Evaluation of MRI features of neuromas in oncological amputees, and the relation to pain.

The impact of time on neuroma growth and morphology on pain intensity is unknown. This study aims to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) differences between symptomatic and non-symptomatic neuromas in oncological amputees, and whether time influences MRI-detected neuroma dimensions and their association with pain. Oncological patients who underwent traditional extremity amputation were included. Post-amputation MRIs were assessed before decision for neuroma surgery. Chart review was performed for residual limb pain (numeric rating scale, 0-10) and the presence of neuropathic symptoms. Neuromas were classified as symptomatic or non-symptomatic, with neuroma size expressed as radiological neuroma-to-nerve-ratio (NNR). Among 78 neuromas in 60 patients, the median NNR was 2.0, and 56 neuromas (71.8%) were symptomatic with a median pain score of 3.5. NNR showed no association with symptomatology or pain intensity but correlated with a longer time-to-neuroma-excision interval and a smaller nerve caliber. Symptomatic neuromas were associated with lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, and the presence of heterotopic ossification. Lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, perineural edema, and presence of heterotopic ossification were associated with more painful neuromas. MRI features associated with symptomatic neuromas and pain intensity were identified. Awareness of the potential clinical significance of these imaging features may help in the interpretation of MRI exams and may aid clinicians in patient selection for neuroma surgery in oncological amputees.

Neuroma-to-Nerve Ratio: Does Size Matter?

Anatomic features of neuromas have been explored in imaging studies. However, there has been limited research into these features using resected, ex vivo human neuroma specimens. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence that time may have on neuroma growth and size, and the clinical significance of these parameters. Patients who underwent neuroma excision between 2022 through 2023 were prospectively included in this study. Neuroma specimens were obtained after operative resection. Standardized neuroma size measurements, expressed as a neuroma-to-nerve ratio (NNR), were conducted with ImageJ software. Pain data (numeric rating scale, 0-10) were prospectively recorded during preoperative evaluation, and patient factors were collected from chart reviews. Fifty terminal neuroma specimens from 31 patients were included, with 94.0% of the neuromas obtained from individuals with amputations. Most neuromas were excised from the lower extremities (n = 44, 88.0%). The neuromas had a median NNR of 2.45, and the median injury to neuroma excision interval was 6.3 years. Larger NNRs were associated with a longer injury to neuroma excision interval and with a smaller native nerve diameter. In addition, sensory nerves were associated with a larger NNR compared with mixed nerves. NNR was not associated with preoperative pain or with anatomical nerve distribution. This study suggests that neuromas seem to continue to grow over time and that smaller nerves may form relatively larger neuromas. In addition, sensory nerves develop relatively larger neuromas compared with mixed nerves. Neuroma size does not appear to correlate with pain severity. These findings may stimulate future research efforts and contribute to a better understanding of symptomatic neuroma development.

Outcome measures used in peripheral nerve surgery for symptomatic neuroma in upper extremity amputations: A scoping review.

Novel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult-acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi-center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.

A novel animal model of symptomatic neuroma for assessing neuropathic pain

IntroductionFollowing amputation, peripheral nerves lack distal targets for regeneration, often resulting in symptomatic neuromas and debilitating neuropathic pain. Animal models can establish a practical method for symptomatic neuroma formation for better understanding of neuropathic pain pathophysiology through behavioral and histological assessments. We created a clinically translatable animal model of symptomatic neuroma to mimic neuropathic pain in patients and assess sexual differences in pain behaviors. MethodsTwenty-two male and female rats were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups: (1) neuroma surgery, or (2) sham surgery. For the neuroma experimental group, the tibial nerve was transected in the thigh, and the proximal segment was placed under the skin for mechanical testing at the site of neuroma. For the sham surgery, rats underwent tibial nerve isolation without transection. Behavioral testing consisted of neuroma-site pain, mechanical allodynia, cold allodynia, and thermal hyperalgesia at baseline, and then weekly over 8 weeks. ResultsMale and female neuroma rats demonstrated significantly higher neuroma-site pain response compared to sham groups starting at weeks 3 and 4, indicating symptomatic neuroma formation. Weekly assessment of mechanical and cold allodynia among neuroma groups showed a significant difference in pain behavior compared to sham groups (p < 0.001). Overall, males and females did not display significant differences in their pain responses. Histology revealed a characteristic neuroma bulb at week 8, including disorganized axons, fibrotic tissue, Schwann cell displacement, and immune cell infiltration. ConclusionThis novel animal model is a useful tool to investigate underlying mechanisms of neuroma formation and neuropathic pain.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for a Symptomatic Neuroma in a Traumatic Transmetatarsal Amputee: A Case Report.

An overall healthy 48-year-old man suffered a left foot mangled crush injury resulting in a post-transmetatarsal amputation and subsequently developing a painful neuroma on the plantar surface of the foot. To avoid the zone of injury, targeted muscle reinnervation was used to treat the neuroma by coapting the tibial nerve to the motor point of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle. At 1-year follow-up, the patient reported no pain at rest, returned to work, and could ambulate with an orthosis for 30 minutes. Rare tibial nerve coaptations to the FHL could serve as a treatment option for patients with neuromas in traumatic postmetatarsal amputation.

Frequency and Localization of Neuromas in Transtibial Residual Limbs

ObjectiveTo describe the frequency and localization of neuromas in residual limbs of individuals with transtibial amputation using ultrasound imaging. DesignCross-sectional study. SettingRehabilitation center research laboratory. ParticipantsAdults who have lived with a transtibial amputation for >12 months were recruited for this study. Participants were included regardless of the presence or absence of residual limb neuropathic pain. Twenty-three participants (24 transtibial residual limbs) with and without residual limb neuropathic pain were enrolled. The etiology of amputation of most participants was peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. InterventionA comprehensive history was collected and a musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment for the presence and location of neuromas in their residual limb was conducted. During the ultrasound evaluation, a sonopalpation Tinel test was performed by applying pressure on each neuroma with the probe. Main Outcome MeasuresNumber of neuromas and their localization in each residual limb examined. ResultsA total of 31 neuromas in the 24 transtibial residual limbs were identified by ultrasound imaging. The average number of neuromas per residual limb was 1.3. All the major peripheral nerves studied could present neuromas, with a predominance of the superficial fibular nerve within our sample. Thirty-five percent of all the neuromas were described as painful. ConclusionsThe presence of terminal neuromas on surgically sectioned nerves in transtibial residual limbs is frequent. Seventy-nine percent of participants had at least one neuroma. Ultrasound imaging is clinically useful to identify neuromas. The evaluator can easily communicate with the patient to diagnose symptomatic neuromas.

Histopathological Confirmation of Axonal Sprouting in Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface

Summary: Symptomatic neuroma represents a debilitating complication after major limb amputation. The regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) has emerged as a reproducible and practical surgery aimed at mitigating the formation of painful neuroma. Although previous animal studies revealed axonal sprouting, elongation, and synaptogenesis of proximal nerve stump within the muscle graft in RPNI, there is a lack of reports confirming these physiological reactions at the histopathological level in human samples. This report presents a case of below-knee amputation with RPNI due to foot gangrene resulting from polyarteritis nodosa. Subsequently, an above-knee amputation was necessitated due to the exacerbation of polyarteritis nodosa, providing the opportunity for histopathological examination of the RPNI site. The examination revealed sprouting, elongation, and existence of neuromuscular junction of the tibial nerve within the grafted muscle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating axonal sprouting, elongation, and possibility of synaptogenesis of the nerve stump within the grafted muscle in a human sample.

Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Pediatric Lower Limb Amputation Patients.

To evaluate the prophylactic effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery on pediatric post-amputation pain. Chronic post-amputation pain is a debilitating and refractory sequela of limb amputation affecting up to 83% of pediatric patients with limb loss, resulting in disability and decreased quality of life. We postulate that prophylactic RPNI surgery performed during amputation may decrease the incidence of symptomatic neuroma and development of phantom limb pain, as well as limit analgesic use among pediatric patients with limb loss. Retrospective chart review was performed on pediatric patients between the ages of 8 and 21 years who underwent major lower limb amputation with and without RPNI surgery. Documented neuroma and phantom limb pain scores as well as analgesic use was recorded. Narcotic use was converted to milligrams morphine equivalents per day (MME/day) while overall analgesic use was converted to Medication Quantification Scale version III (MQSIII) scores. Analysis was performed using Stata. Forty-four pediatric patients were identified; 25 RPNI patients and 19 controls. Seventy-nine percent of control patients developed chronic post-amputation pain versus 21% of RPNI patients (P<0.001). Among the patients who developed post-amputation pain, 20% of controls developed clinical neuroma pain, compared to 0% of RPNI patients (P<0.001). Additionally, RPNI patients demonstrated a significant decrease in pain score (P=0.007) and narcotic usage (P<0.01), compared to controls. Overall analgesic use did not vary significantly between groups. Prophylactic RPNI surgery shows promise for pediatric patients undergoing major lower limb amputation by preventing both symptomatic neuromas and possibly the development of phantom limb pain.

Superficial branch of the radial nerve regularly contains fibers from the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: A role in neuroma treatment

BackgroundMany surgical strategies aim to treat the symptomatic neuroma of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN). It is still difficult to treat despite many attempts to reveal a reason for surgical treatment failure. The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) is known to overlap and communicate with SBRN. Our study aims to determine the frequency of spreading of LACN fibers into SBRN branches through a microscopic dissection to predict where and how often LACN fibers may be involved in SBRN neuroma. MethodsEighty-seven cadaveric forearms were thoroughly dissected. The path of LACN fibers through the SBRN branching was ascertained using microscopic dissection. Distances between the interstyloid line and entry of LACN fibers into the SBRN and emerging and bifurcation points of the SBRN were measured. ResultsThe LACN fibers joined the SBRN at a mean distance of 1.7 ± 2.5 cm proximal to the interstyloid line. The SBRN contained fibers from the LACN in 62% of cases. Most commonly, there were LACN fibers within the SBRN’s third branch (59%), but they were also observed within the first branch, the second branch, and their common trunk (21%, 9.2%, and 22%, respectively). The lowest rate of the LACN fibers was found within the SBRN trunk (6.9%). ConclusionThe SBRN contains LACN fibers in almost 2/3 of the cases, therefore, the denervation of both nerves might be required to treat the neuroma. However, the method must be considered based on the particular clinical situation.

Cervical approach for prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma resection

ObjectiveTo describe the key points of cervical resection for prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma and to discuss the role of modern imaging. ObservationRetrospective case series of 10 patients (4 women and 6 men, age 29–63 years) with prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma with 2 to 8cm largest diameter on MRI, consecutively resected via a cervical approach between 2000 and 2020 in a French tertiary university referral care center. Seven patients had a minimum 10 years’ follow-up, and one was lost to follow-up before the fifth postoperative year. Peri- and postoperative complications comprised great auricular nerve transection without subsequent symptomatic neuroma (2 patients), associated transoral approach to free the upper pole of the adenoma (2 patients), capsule effraction (3 patients), and hematoma (1 patient). There were no cases of facial paresis or palsy, other cranial nerve impairment, trismus, auriculotemporal or first-bite syndrome. One of the three patients with capsule effraction showed local recurrence at month 17. ConclusionIn agreement with previous reports, the present case series confirmed the role of the cervical approach to resect prestyloid parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma, and hence the need to continue teaching it.

Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nerve Implanted into Muscle versus Targeted Muscle Reinnervation versus Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface, for Treatment of the Painful Neuroma.

This study investigated the relative cost utility of three techniques for the management of symptomatic neuromas after neuroma excision: (1) implantation of nerve into muscle, (2) targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), and (3) regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI). The costs associated with each procedure were determined using Common Procedural Terminology codes in combination with data from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Physician and Facility 2020 Fee Schedules. The relative utility of the three procedures investigated was determined using changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores as reported per procedure. The relative utility of each procedure was reported in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as is standard in the literature. The least expensive option for the surgical treatment of painful neuromas was nerve implantation into an adjacent muscle. In contrast, for the treatment of four neuromas, as is common postamputation, TMR without a microscope was found to cost $50,061.55 per QALY gained, TMR with a microscope was found to cost $51,996.80 per QALY gained, and RPNI was found to cost $14,069.28 per QALY gained. While RPNI was more expensive than nerve implantation into muscle, it was still below the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, while TMR was not. Evaluation of costs and utilities associated with the various surgical options for the management of painful neuromas suggest that nerve implantation into muscle is the least expensive option with the best improvement in QALY, while demonstrating comparable outcomes to TMR and RPNI with regard to pain symptoms.

Heterotopic Ossification Is Associated with Painful Neuromas in Transtibial Amputees Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuromas

Background: A relationship between nerve and osseous regeneration has been described. During the surgical treatment of symptomatic neuroma in transtibial amputees, we have noticed that heterotopic ossification (HO) depicted on preoperative radiographs appears to be associated with the location of symptomatic neuromas in both the peroneal and tibial nerve distributions. Methods: Data were collected for transtibial amputees who underwent surgical management of symptomatic neuroma and were prospectively enrolled from 2018 through 2023. Preoperative radiographs were assessed for the presence of HO located at the distal fibula and tibia. The presence of a peroneal and/or tibial neuroma was based on findings contained within the operative reports. Pain levels were measured on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Results: Sixty-five limbs of 62 amputees were include. Peroneal neuroma and presence of fibular HO (P=0.001), and tibial neuroma and presence of tibial HO (P=0.038) demonstrated an association. The odds of having a symptomatic peroneal neuroma with fibular HO present are greater than the odds of a symptomatic peroneal neuroma when fibular HO is absent (OR 9.3; 95%CI [1.9-45.6], P=0.006). Pre-operative pain scores were significantly higher for all patients with HO (P&lt;0.001), those with fibular HO (P&lt;0.001), and those with tibial HO (P&lt;0.001), compared to patients without HO. Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic neuromas, preoperative pain was worse when HO was present in the transtibial amputee's residual limb. Further research on the neuroma-HO-complex in symptomatic amputees is required. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV

Similar rates of reoperation for neuroma after transtibial amputations with and without targeted muscle reinnervation.

To compare the rates of revision surgery for symptomatic neuromas in patients undergoing primary transtibial amputations with and without targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). Retrospective cohort study. Level I trauma hospital and tertiary military medical center. Adult patients undergoing transtibial amputations with and without TMR. Transtibial amputation with targeted muscle reinnervation. Reoperation for symptomatic neuroma. During the study period, there were 112 primary transtibial amputations performed, 29 with TMR and 83 without TMR. Over the same period, there were 51 revision transtibial amputations performed, including 23 (21%) in the patients undergoing primary transtibial amputation at the study institution. The most common indications for revision surgery were wound breakdown/dehiscence (42%, n = 25), followed by symptomatic neuroma 18% (n = 9/51) and infection/osteomyelitis (17%, n = 10) as the most common indications. However, of the patients undergoing primary amputation at the study's institution, there was no difference in reoperation rates for neuroma when comparing the TMR group (3.6%, n = 1/28) and no TMR group (4.0%, n = 3/75) (P = 0.97). Symptomatic neuroma is one of the most common reasons for revision amputation; however, this study was unable to demonstrate a difference in revision surgery rates for neuroma for patients undergoing primary transtibial amputation with or without targeted muscle reinnervation. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Surgery for the Management of Chronic Posttraumatic Neuropathic Pain.

Chronic pain resulting from peripheral nerve injury remains a common issue in the United States and affects 7 to 10% of the population. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery is an innovative surgical procedure designed to treat posttraumatic neuropathic pain, particularly when a symptomatic neuroma is present on clinical exam. RPNI surgery involves implantation of a transected peripheral nerve into an autologous free muscle graft to provide denervated targets to regenerating axons. RPNI surgery has been found in animal and human studies to be highly effective in addressing postamputation pain. While most studies have reported its uses in the amputation patient population for the treatment of neuroma and phantom limb pain, RPNI surgery has recently been used to address refractory headache, postmastectomy pain, and painful donor sites from the harvest of neurotized flaps. This review summarizes the current understanding of RPNI surgery for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery for Mitigation of Neuroma and Postamputation Pain.

A neuroma occurs when a regenerating transected peripheral nerve has no distal target to reinnervate. Symptomatic neuromas are a common cause of postamputation pain that can lead to substantial disability1-3. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) surgery may benefit patients through the use of free nonvascularized muscle grafts as physiologic targets for peripheral nerve reinnervation for mitigation of neuroma and postamputation pain. An RPNI is constructed by implanting the distal end of a transected peripheral nerve into a free nonvascularized skeletal muscle graft. The neuroma or free end of the affected nerve is identified, transected, and skeletonized. A free muscle graft is then harvested from the donor thigh or from the existing amputation site, and the distal end of each transected nerve is implanted into the center of the free muscle graft with use of 6-0 nonabsorbable suture. This can be done acutely at the time of amputation or as an elective procedure at any time postoperatively. Nonsurgical treatments of neuromas include desensitization, chemical or anesthetic injections, biofeedback, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, topical lidocaine, and/or other medications (e.g., antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids). Surgical treatment of neuromas includes neuroma excision, nerve capping, excision with transposition into bone or muscle, nerve grafting, and targeted muscle reinnervation. Creation of an RPNI is a simple and reproducible surgical option to prevent neuroma formation that leverages several biologic processes and addresses many limitations of existing neuroma-treatment strategies. Given the understanding that neuromas will form when regenerating axons are not presented with end organs for reinnervation, any strategy that reduces the number of aimless axons within a residual limb should serve to reduce symptomatic neuromas. The use of free muscle grafts offers a vast supply of denervated muscle targets for regenerating nerve axons and facilitates the reestablishment of neuromuscular junctions without sacrificing denervation of any residual muscles. Articles describing RPNI surgery for postamputation pain have shown favorable outcomes, with significant reduction in neuroma pain and phantom pain scores at approximately 7 months postoperatively4,5. Neuroma pain scores were reduced by 71% and phantom pain scores were reduced by 53%4. Prophylactic RPNI surgery is also associated with substantially lower incidence of symptomatic neuromas (0% versus 13.3%) and a lower rate of phantom limb pain (51.1% versus 91.1%)5 compared with the rates in patients who did not undergo RPNI surgery. Ask the patient preoperatively to point at the site of maximal tenderness, as this can serve as a guide for where the symptomatic neuroma may be located. The incision can be made either through the previous site of the amputation or directly over the site of maximal tenderness longitudinally. The pitfall of incising directly over the site is creating another incision with its attendant risk of wound infection.Excise the terminal neuroma with a knife until healthy-appearing axons are visualized.The free nonvascularized skeletal muscle graft can be obtained from local muscle (preferred) or from a separate donor site. A separate donor site can introduce donor-site morbidity and complications, including hematoma and pain.The harvested skeletal muscle graft should ideally be approximately 35 mm long, 20 mm wide, and 5 mm thick in order to ensure survivability and to prevent central necrosis. The harvesting can be performed with curved Mayo scissors.The peripheral nerve should be implanted parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers, and the epineurium should be secured to the free muscle graft at 1 or 2 places. One suture should be utilized to tack the distal end of the epineurium to the middle of the bed of the muscle graft. Another suture should be utilized to start the wrapping of the muscle graft around the nerve using a bite through the muscle, a bite through the epineurium of the proximal end of the nerve, and another bite through the other muscle edge in order to form a cylindrical wrap around the nerve.Wrap the entire muscle graft by taking only bites of muscle graft around the nerve to secure the muscle graft in a cylindrical structure using 2 to 4 more sutures.Avoid locating the RPNI near weight-bearing surfaces of the residual limb when closing. The RPNI should be in the muscular tissue, deep to the subcutaneous tissue and dermis.Do perform intraneural dissection for large-caliber nerves to create several (normally 2 to 4) distinct RPNIs, to avoid too many regenerating axons in a single free muscle graft.

Use of Supinator Motor Branches in Targeted Muscle Reinnervation of the Superficial Radial Nerve.

Symptomatic neuromas of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) can cause debilitating pain. Traditional surgical management options have demonstrated inconsistent outcomes prompting a search for alternatives. Recent reports have emerged on the use of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) for neuromas of the SRN using donors that are well established in hand surgery, such as the brachioradialis (BR) or extensor capri radialis longus or brevis. Use of the brachioradialis or extensor capri radialis longus motor targets can require surgery at or above the level of the antecubital fossa, and denervation of these muscle groups may be undesirable in cases of complex upper extremity injury where these donors may be needed for tendon or nerve transfer. The supinator is an expendable and often overlooked donor nerve that has not been assessed as a target for TMR of the SRN. In this case series, three patients with SRN neuromas whose conservative management failed and who did not have an SRN lesion amenable to reconstruction were managed with TMR to the nerves to supinator. At latest follow-up (9-22 months), no patients had deficits in supination or evident donor site morbidity. Two patients reported complete resolution of their SRN neuroma pain, and one patient reported partial improvement. This case series reports early results of TMR of the SRN using nerves to supinator in cases of SRN neuromas not amenable to reconstruction, demonstrating technical feasibility, improvements in neuroma pain, and no discernible donor morbidity.

Discussion: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.

Discussion: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.

The Double-Opposing Adipofascial Interposition Flap: A Novel Technique to Prevent Scar Tethering and Symptomatic Neuroma of the Superficial Radial Nerve After Trauma.

The superficial radial nerve (SRN) is vulnerable to injury following trauma with a high incidence of resultant nerve tether and neuroma formation. The SRN has an anatomical predisposition to neuroma formation, with research indicating that its propensity to neuroma development is out of proportion with its likelihood for injury. In addition, SRN neuromas havebeen described as one of the more painful and difficult neuromas to manage. Despite this, the published literature to date is chiefly focused on neuroma and scar tether treatment options rather than more impactful work on neuroma prevention, which can be safely delivered at the time of primary surgery. Treatment of established neuroma or nerve tether is notoriously difficult, and existing techniques have inconsistent outcomes, with patients often requiring multiple trips to the theatre. The authors present a novel technique for neuroma and scar tether prevention using an adipofascial flap accompanied by patient examples of our experience using this approach as an adjunct during the primary SRN repair, creating a gliding, interposing layer to prevent subsequent nerve traction pain and symptomatic neuroma. We identified five patients presenting with dorsal wrist injuries involving the SRN and one or more tendons. Patients' follow-up duration was a mean of 3.5 months (one to eight months). All follow-up patients showed no symptoms of a neuroma or nerve tether pain. All patients were discharged without re-referral or further surgery. Our patient sample demonstrates promising results using an adipofascial interposition flap as a prophylactic measure in traumatic injuries to reduce nerve tether pain and symptomatic neuroma formation in the SRN.