Symptomatic Heterotopic Ossification Research Articles

The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed. Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%. This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR.

Surgical Treatment of Severe Heterotopic Ossification After Total Hip Arthroplasty Over the Last 25 Years: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a New Case Series

BackgroundSevere heterotopic ossification (HO) (grades III and IV) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) over the last 25 years requiring excision is very uncommon. We performed a systematic review of the literature and reported a new case series with operative treatment after primary uncemented THA. MethodsA systematic review identified papers describing patients who had excision of HO after THA performed after 1988. Concepts of hip arthroplasty, HO, and surgical excision were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to November 2022. The inclusion criteria were articles that included specific patient data on the grade of HO, operative procedure, and prophylaxis. Studies were screened for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. The extracted data included demographic data, the interval from index surgery to excision, clinical results, and complications. There was one surgeon who performed reoperation for ankylosis of primary THA in 3 men who had severe pain and hip deformity. ResultsData from 7 studies were included. There were 41 patients who had grade III or IV HO who had excision, and in 5 patients, revision of a component was also performed. Perioperative prophylaxis was irradiation alone in 10 patients, irradiation and indomethacin in 10 patients, and indomethacin alone in 21 patients. At a mean follow-up time of 14.8 months, the definition of the results was not uniform, and range of motion was improved, but relief of pain was inconsistent. There was one dislocation after resection without revision, one gastrointestinal complication, and 2 recurrences. Treatment of the 3 new patients, with wide excision of periarticular bone, selective exchange of components, and perioperative irradiation prophylaxis, was successful in improving pain, motion, and deformity. ConclusionsThere is insufficient good-quality data on the operative treatment of severe symptomatic HO after THA performed over the last 25 years. Prophylaxis with low-dose irradiation prevented a recurrence. Multicenter studies are needed to determine the optimum timing and prognosis for treatment.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fracture: A Contemporary Series

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is the operation of choice for salvage of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture. While high failure rates have been reported for these procedures, existing literature reports mainly on historical implant designs and techniques. We aimed to describe implant survivorships, complications, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of contemporary THA following prior open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an acetabular fracture. MethodsWe identified 104 patients undergoing THA following prior ORIF of an acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2015 via our institutional total joint registry. Mean age at THA was 50 years (range, 18 to 79 years), 71% were men, and mean body mass index was 27 (range, 18 to 52). All patients were implanted with uncemented acetabular components, and 89% had uncemented stems. Some hardware from prior fixation was retained in 94% of cases. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 2 to 21 years). ResultsThe 10-year survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 98% and 97%, respectively. There were 4 revisions: 1 each for psoas tendonitis, dislocation, acetabular aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection. There were 9 complications that did not lead to reoperation: 5 dislocations, 2 periprosthetic femur fractures, 1 sciatic nerve palsy, and 1 case of symptomatic heterotopic ossification. All unrevised components appeared radiographically well-fixed. Mean Harris Hip Score improved from mean 50 preoperatively to mean 82 at 5 years (P < .001). ConclusionsIn this series of contemporary THAs following prior acetabular fracture ORIF, revision-free survivorship was excellent with only a single case of acetabular aseptic loosening. These results are encouraging and suggest that contemporary implants and techniques have notably improved on historic results. Level of EvidenceTherapeutic, Level IV.

Prevalence of Heterotopic Ossification following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: End-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating pathology and is most commonly preceded by trauma. Surgical intervention via ankle arthrodesis or ankle arthroplasty is the mainstay management option. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common finding following joint arthroplasty. However, no consensus regarding the impact of heterotopic ossification on clinical outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty has been reached to date. The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical outcomes of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: During January 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting heterotopic ossification following TAA. Data regarding surgical characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, failure rates and complications were extracted and analysed. Results: Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 45% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (120 patients, 33.9%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in AOFAS, VAS and ROM between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 10.5%. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAA that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-severe, symptomatic HO following TAA. This study is limited by the significant heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAA.

Heterotopic Ossification Remodeling After Acetabular Surgery: A Natural History Case Report.

A 30-year-old woman presented with a transverse plus posterior wall acetabular fracture and underwent operative fixation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. Shared decision was made for no heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis. The patient developed symptomatic HO and was scheduled for resection, which was delayed because of the pandemic. She returned with interval remodeling of HO and symptom resolution. No surgery was required. HO is a common complication after acetabular injury. Resection is the treatment of choice for symptomatic HO. We are not aware of other reports of spontaneous remodeling of symptomatic HO such that it no longer required surgery.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SEVERE HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION AFTER CONTEMPORARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND NEW CASE SERIES

Severe heterotopic ossification (grade III and IV) after contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA) requiring excision is very uncommon. We performed a systematic review of the literature, and report a new case series with operative treatment after primary uncemented THA.A systematic review identified papers describing patients who had excision of heterotopic ossification (HO) after contemporary THA, defined as performed after 1988. Concepts of hip arthroplasty, heterotopic ossification, and surgical excision were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database inception to November 2022. Inclusion criteria were: articles that included specific patient data on grade of heterotopic ossification, operative procedure, and prophylaxis. Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers. Extracted data included demographic data, interval from index surgery to excision, clinical results, and complications. One surgeon performed reoperation for ankylosis of primary THA in three patients with severe pain and deformity.Seven case series or case report studies were included. There were 41 patients, with grade III or IV HO, that had excision, and in five patients, revision of a component was also performed. Perioperative prophylaxis was irradiation alone in 10 patients, irradiation and indomethacin in 10, and indomethacin alone in 21 patients. At a mean follow-up time of 14.8 months, definition of the results was not uniform, and range of motion was improved, but relief of pain was inconsistent. There was one dislocation, one gastrointestinal complication, and two recurrences. Treatment of the three patients, with wide excision of peri-articular bone, selective exchange of components, and peri-operative irradiation prophylaxis, was successful in improving motion and deformity.There is insufficient data on the treatment of severe symptomatic HO after contemporary THA. Prophylaxis with low-dose irradiation was successful to prevent recurrence. Multicenter studies will be needed to determine the optimum timing and prognosis for treatment.

Heterotopic Ossification After Modern Total Hip Arthroplasty: Predisposing Factors, Prophylaxis, and Surgical Treatment.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common radiographic finding and potentially serious complication after modern total hip arthroplasty. Although historically associated with the posterolateral approach, HO has been noted in 10% to 40% of patients having direct anterior or anterior-based muscle sparing approaches. The available data are uncertain whether robotic arm-assisted procedures are associated with this complication. Current prophylaxis for patients considered high risk of this complication includes postoperative, nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory medication for several weeks or low-dose perioperative irradiation. The surgical treatment of symptomatic HO associated with severely restricted motion or ankylosis of the hip should be individualized but may include wide excision of bone, acetabular revision to prevent instability, and prophylaxis to prevent recurrence.

Rectus Femoris Heterotopic Ossification: Combined Arthroscopic and Open Resection With Allograft Reconstruction and Concomitant Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO), or the abnormal formation of bone in extra-skeletal tissue, is a well-known complication of orthopedic trauma, tendon avulsions, chronic injuries, spinal cord injuries, and soft tissue damage from surgery. Heterotopic ossification commonly develops at the direct or indirect head of the rectus femoris. Athletes are especially susceptible to chronic microtearing and acute tendon avulsion, which may result in HO. When HO develops in the setting of concurrent intra-articular hip pathology, it may be amendable to arthroscopic excision, depending on its size and location. Indications: Heterotopic ossification that develops adjacent to the hip joint can affect range of motion of the joint and is often a source of pain. Arthroscopic excision is indicated when the HO that develops within or about the hip joint is symptomatic and is of a location and size that it can be reached and excised arthroscopically. Technique Description: In this technical note, we describe our method to excise HO using initial arthroscopic surgery to address femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and perform initial dissection of the HO fragment. Heterotopic ossification resection was then completed via an anterior open approach followed by reconstruction of the rectus femoris origin with Achilles allograft. This is followed by our HO prophylaxis protocol of indomethacin 75 mg daily for 4 days, followed by naproxen 500 mg 2 times daily through postoperative day 30, although many other regimens exist for HO prophylaxis. Results: Using arthroscopy for the removal of symptomatic HO at the time of surgery allows for the management of concomitant intra-articular pathology and efficient and precise dissection of the undersurface of the HO fragment. Discussion/Conclusion: Heterotopic ossification is a well-characterized complication of soft tissue damage, including tendon avulsion, trauma, previous surgery, and chronic microtear of the hip musculature. Oftentimes, HO develops in a location that can be reached arthroscopically. Surgeons should consider combining intra-articular arthroscopic surgery with arthroscopic excision of HO when appropriate, noting that there are many advantages to arthroscopic removal when compared with open procedures. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Elbow arthroplasty is safe for the management of simple open distal humeral fractures.

Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n=9) or hemiarthroplasty (n=8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings. The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation±17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P=.02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P=.12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n=1), joint instability (n=1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n=3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded. EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

Distal biceps repair through a single incision with the use of a knotless cortical button device: Mid-term results.

Distal biceps rupture presents with an increasing incidence and evidence suggests that although a surgical repair is not mandatory, it results in superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative management. As implant technology has advanced, several devices have been utilised and studied in managing this pathology. We present our single-centre experience with the use of the ToggleLoc Ziploop reattachment device, a knotless cortical button implant, using a single-incision technique. Retrospective series of 70 consecutive distal biceps tendon repairs, at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months after surgery, using a standardised single implant, single-incision technique, and post-operative rehabilitation programme. There was one (1.4%) re-rupture in our patient cohort. The range of motion was complete in all patients except for one patient who had symptomatic heterotopic ossification, causing limitation in pronation. Complications were minor with the commonest being transient neuropraxia of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm. The mean Oxford elbow score was 46.9 out of 48, and the patient global impression of change scale was 7 out of 7 in 77% of cases. Our data support this technique and implant combination when dealing with acute and chronic distal biceps tendon rupture.

Complications of surgical reconstruction of multiligament injuries of the knee joint: diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

The main complications of surgical reconstruction of multiligament injuries of the knee joint are residual or recurrent instability, arthrofibrosis, popliteal artery injury, common peroneal nerve injury, compartment syndrome, fluid extravasation, symptomatic heterotopic ossification, wound problems and infection, deep venous thrombosis, and revision surgery.Careful surgical planning and execution of the primary surgical reconstruction of multiligament injuries of the knee joint can minimize the risk of the aforementioned complications.Careful postoperative follow-up is required to detect complications. Early recognition and prompt treatment are of paramount importance.To obtain good results in the revision surgery of failed multiligamentary knee reconstructions, it is crucial to perform a thorough and exhaustive evaluation to detect all the causes of failure.Addressing all associated injuries during revision surgery will lead to the best possible subjective and objective results, although functional outcomes are often modest.However, advanced age and high-energy injuries have been associated with the poorest functional outcomes after revision surgery of failed multiligament injuries of the knee joint. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:973-981. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210057

Developing a combat-relevant translatable large animal model of heterotopic ossification

Heterotopic ossification (HO) refers to ectopic bone formation, typically in residual limbs following trauma and injury. A review of injuries from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) indicated that approximately 70% of war wounds involved the musculoskeletal system, largely in part from the use of improvised explosive devices (IED) and rocket-propelled grenades (RPG). HO is reported to occur in approximately 63%–65% of wounded warriors from OIF and OEF. Symptomatic HO may delay rehabilitation regimens since it often requires modifications to prosthetic limb componentry and socket size. There is limited evidence indicating a mechanism for preventing HO. This may be due to inadequate models, which do not produce HO bone structure that is morphologically similar to HO samples obtained from wounded warfighters injured in theatre. We hypothesized that using a high-power blast of air (shockwave) and simulated battlefield trauma (i.e. bone damage, tourniquet, bacteria, negative pressure wound therapy) in a large animal model, HO would form and have similar morphology to ectopic bone observed in clinical samples. Initial radiographic and micro-computed tomography (CT) data demonstrated ectopic bone growth in sheep 24 weeks post-procedure. Advanced histological and backscatter electron (BSE) analyses showed that 5 out of 8 (63%) sheep produced HO with similar morphology to clinical samples. We conclude that not all ectopic bone observed by radiograph or micro-CT in animal models is HO. Advanced histological and BSE analyses may improve confirmation of HO presence and morphology, which we demonstrated can be produced in a large animal model.

Primary Versus Secondary Radiotherapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prevention About the Elbow.

To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow. Retrospective chart review. Level 1 trauma center. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15-year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included. All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. Ninety-eight percentage of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery. The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint. Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT and 11.1% required surgery to resect the heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified. Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow-up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Malleolus Fractures via a Posteromedial Approach

Ankle fractures with a posterior malleolus component are complex injuries. The most commonly used operative methods include indirect reduction via a percutaneous anterior approach and direct reduction via a posterolateral approach. For large posterior malleolus fractures with medial extension, direct reduction via a posteromedial approach is an alternative operative option. The authors hypothesized that fixation of large posterior malleolus fractures via a posteromedial approach results in anatomic reduction and stable plate fixation. From 2008 to 2015, 22 (9.0%) of 244 consecutive operative ankle fractures were identified as posterior malleolus fractures treated using a posteromedial approach. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, operative details, follow-up time, and any postoperative complications. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to ensure that anatomic reduction and stable fixation was maintained. Sixteen (72.7%) of 22 patients were female, and the average age at the time of surgery was 54.1 years (range, 26-86 years). The average follow-up time was 13.0 months (range, 2.0-41.4 months). Twenty-one (95.5%) of 22 patients healed on a radiographic and clinical basis. There was an 18.2% (4 of 22) postoperative complication rate: 1 patient had a nonunion, 1 patient had cellulitis, 1 patient had osteomyelitis involving the fibula, and 1 patient had symptomatic heterotopic ossification. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolus fractures via a posteromedial approach achieved anatomic reduction, stable plate fixation, and complete healing in all but 1 patient. This study demonstrates that the posteromedial approach is a reasonable alternative to other more commonly used methods for treating these fractures. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):e166-e170.].

Symptomatic heterotopic ossification: incidence and risk factors of a musculoskeletal complication in a general Intensive Care Unit

Background: Heterotopic ossification is a musculoskeletal complication in patients in intensive care unit which expects to impair their mobility and quality of life after discharge. The aim of the study was to examine the incidence and the risk factors of heterotopic ossification in critically ill patients. Methods: One hundred-ninety seven consecutive patients evaluated through clinical and laboratory screenings for heterotopic ossification upon admission and discharge and 123 of them were eligible for the study. Symptomatic heterotopic ossification was confirmed to 9 patients (7.31%) by means of ultrasonography and radiography. Many risk factors examined by logistic regression such as age, admission of Glasgow Coma Scale score, length of stay in intensive care unit, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration in Venturi mask and in mask tracheostomy, days in coma, traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury, increased intracranial pressure monitoring, autonomic dysregulation and days in respiratory alkalosis. Results: The risk factors that predict heterotopic ossification were: age, duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory alkalosis, days in coma, admission of Glasgow Coma Scale score, increased intracranial pressure monitoring, autonomic dysregulation, and non–traumatic brain injury. In multivariate analysis were found significant the autonomic dysregulation, the respiratory alkalosis, the increased intracranial pressure monitoring and the duration of mechanical ventilation (F=17.44, p&lt;0.00).Conclusions: The incidence of symptomatic heterotopic ossification appears to be significant in a general intensive care unit. A few factors seem to predict the occurrence of it, confirming previous studies. Larger studies are needed to be done for better prevention and early identification of this frequent musculoskeletal complication in critical ill patients.

Heterotopic Ossification of the Hip Post Reamed Intramedullary Femoral Nail: A Case Report

Hetorotopic Ossification (HO) is abnormal formation of bone in the soft tissue. Heterotopic ossification of the hip following reamed interlocking medullary nail is uncommon and it has received little attention from the clinician. We take this opportunity to report a young man who presented with symptomatic heterotopic ossification of the hip eight months post antegrade reamed interlocking medullary nail which failed conservative treatment. Reamed intramedullary nailing and delayed mobilization are the contributing factors in this patient. The pathophysiology of this condition is not fully understood. As a result, there is no consensus in the prevention of heterotopic ossification in such patients. Similarly, the management of this condition also is lacking but resection is the treatment of choice for symptomatic patient.

Evaluation of Heterotopic Ossification After Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Computed Tomography Review of 996 Disc Levels.

Study Design:Retrospective cohort study.Objectives:Reported incidences and complications of heterotopic ossification (HO) after using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2 (rhBMP-2) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) have been inconclusive. This study was designed to evaluate both incidences of radiologic and symptomatic HO in a large series of TLIFs using rhBMP-2.Methods:A total of 996 disc levels in 927 consecutive TLIF patients were retrospectively evaluated at 6-month postoperative follow-up in a single surgical practice. Subjects were separated into the BMP group and the control group. Operative reports, pre- and postoperative medical records were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed and graded independently for ossification at each disc level of TLIF.Results:A total of 933 disc levels were in the BMP group, and 63 were in the control group. Six-month fusion rate of interbody was 92.5% in the BMP group, which was significantly higher in contrast to 71.4% in the control group (P < .001). The incidence of radiologic HO in the BMP group was 13.5%, which was significantly higher than 1.6% in the control group (P = .006). After controlling for basic demographics and comorbidities, the presence of radiologic HO was significantly associated with the use of rhBMP-2 (P = .026). However, only one case in the BMP group (0.11%) developed a symptomatic HO (mild-medium left buttock pain, treated nonsurgically) involving left foramen of L5-S1.Conclusions:rhBMP-2 can be safely used in TLIF with regard to HO. There was a low rate of radiologic HO and minimal symptomatic HO, with high fusion rates at 6 months postoperative.

Early results of displaced femoral neck fragility fractures treated with supercapsular percutaneous-assisted total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is the preferred treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in select patients, although dislocation remains a concern. In some studies, the supercapsular percutaneously assisted (SuperPATH) approach has demonstrated early mobilization, short hospital stay, and low dislocation rates in primary THA, but there are little data on its use for fractures. This study describes the perioperative outcomes and early dislocation rate of SuperPATH THA for displaced femoral neck fragility fractures.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of previous ambulatory patients with a displaced femoral neck fragility fracture treated with THA using the SuperPATH approach. Demographic data, time to ambulation, length of stay, and in-hospital complications during the hospital stay and follow-up period were recorded. Phone interviews were conducted to check for dislocations 1 year after surgery.ResultsThirty-seven consecutive patients were included with an average age of 75.0 years. Hospital stay averaged 5.5 days, and patients were discharged on average postoperative day 3.6. About 83.8% of patients were ambulatory by postoperative day 1, and 94.6% ambulatory before discharge. Twenty-seven percent of patients were discharged home, 46% to inpatient rehabilitation, 24% to skilled nursing facility, and 1 patient to hospice. At follow-up, there was no symptomatic heterotopic ossification and no infections. Thirty-two patients were available for telephone interviews at 1 year, with no dislocations reported.ConclusionsIn this small cohort, the SuperPATH approach for THA appears to be safe and effective for use in femoral neck fragility fractures, resulting in early ambulation and a low dislocation rate.

Heterotopic Ossification in Hip Arthroscopy: an Updated Review.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) in hip arthroscopy is a common post-operative complication. This review was undertaken to provide an update (2014 present) on the current literature regarding HO in hip arthroscopy. Risk factors for HO post-hip arthroscopy include male gender, mixed impingement, picture, and the size of CAM resection. HO prophylaxis with NSAIDs has been proven to decrease the rate of HO post-hip arthroscopy; however, there is inherent risk to long-standing NSAIDs therapy. HO post-hip arthroscopy is not uncommon as a radiological finding, but symptomatic HO post-hip arthroscopy requiring revision surgery is a rare event, at < 1%. The outcomes for revision surgery for HO excision have fair outcomes. The hip arthroscopist should stratify their patients based on known risk factors, and determine whether NSAIDs prophylaxis is warranted.

The Addition of Hip Arthroscopy to Periacetabular Osteotomy Does Not Increase Complication Rates: A Prospective Case Series

Background: Previous studies on periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) reported complication and reoperation rates of 5.9% and 10%, respectively. Hip arthroscopy is increasingly utilized as an adjunct procedure to PAO to precisely treat associated intra-articular pathology. The addition of this procedure has the potential of further increasing complication rates. Purpose: To determine the rates of complication and reoperation of combined hip arthroscopy and PAO for the treatment of acetabular deformities and associated intra-articular lesions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Using a prospective database, the authors retrospectively reviewed 248 hips (240 patients) that underwent combined hip arthroscopy and PAO between 2007 and 2016. Data were collected at scheduled follow-up visits at approximately 1 month, 3 to 4 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery. Mean follow-up from surgery was 3 years (range, 1-8 years). A total of 220 PAOs were done for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, 18 for symptomatic acetabular retroversion, and 10 for combined acetabular dysplasia and acetabular retroversion. Central compartment arthroscopy was performed for treatment of intra-articular chondrolabral pathology in all cases. Select cases underwent femoral head-neck junction osteochondroplasty either arthroscopically before the PAO or through an open approach after it. Complications were graded according to the modified Dindo-Clavien complication scheme, which was validated for hip preservation procedures. Reoperations (excluding hardware removal) were recorded. Results: Grade III complications occurred among 7 patients (3%) while there were no grade IV complications. Grade III complications included deep infection (n = 3), wound dehiscence (n = 1), hematoma requiring exploration (n = 1), symptomatic heterotopic ossification requiring excision (n = 1), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 1). There were 13 reoperations (5%), and 3 were repeat hip arthroscopy. Univariate Cox hazard models were used to estimate the relative risk factors for complication and reoperation. Increased age (per decade) showed over twice the increased likelihood for complications (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.67-3.74). Also, preoperative diagnosis of acetabular retroversion, not acetabular dysplasia, showed >3 times the increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.41-6.61). Conclusion: The rate of complications reported is comparable (3%) with previously published complication rates of PAO without hip arthroscopy. In this cohort, increasing age and diagnosis of acetabular retroversion were associated with higher complication and reoperation rates.