Background and purpose: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard for managing chronic total occlusion (CTO), but data on characteristics of the patients undergoing PCI for CTO are scarce. The present study was designed to evaluate the clinical profile of the patients who underwent PCI to CTO. Methods: This single-center, prospective, and observational study included consecutive patients who successfully underwent PCI for angiographically confirmed CTO at author’s center from March 2017 to March 2019. Follow-up was conducted at 6 and 12 months. Results: The final analysis included a total of 108 patients. The mean age was 64.5 ± 8.2 years. Majority of the patients (72.2%) were men. The most common morbid risk factors were diabetes mellitus (56.5%), hypertension (53.7%), and dyslipidemia (52.8%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 51% ± 0.0% and 73% had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II. The most common site of CTO was the right coronary artery (34.3%). PCI was conducted using an antegrade approach, 75.9% of the cases. The majority of patients underwent wire escalation PCI technique (52.8%) followed by adverse drug reaction (34.3%), reverse-controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART) (8.3%) and CART (4.6%). Stress test was negative in 63% and 64.8% of the patients at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The 6-month symptom-free survival rate was higher in patients without hypertension. Symptom-free survival rate was 96.9%, 95.9% and 88.9% in patients with Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score of 0, 1 and >3, respectively. The rate of abnormal electrocardiogram at 12 months was higher in patients with J-CTO score of 0 or 1 versus >3. Conclusion: PCI is a viable option for patients who are not willing to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, particularly in those with low J-CTO score.