Symptom Burden In Patients Research Articles

Assessment of Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Patients With Primary Brain Tumours Attending Palliative Care in a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre.

Background: Patients with primary brain tumors navigate a distinct illness trajectory, characterized by an uncertain prognosis, a rapid decline in physical functioning, and a significant deterioration in the quality of life. These unique challenges underscore the importance of our research in understanding and addressing the needs of these patients. Methods: The EORTC QLQ C30 & EORTC BN 20 questionnaires assessed the quality of life and symptom burden in patients with primary brain tumors. The scores were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: 100 patients - 61 males and 39 females-were included with radiological or histopathological diagnoses of primary brain tumours. Seizures (38%) was the most common presenting symptom, followed by headache (18%), loss of consciousness (13%), focal neurological deficit (9%), and blurring of vision (8%). The mean quality of life at baseline was 78.29, with a standard deviation of 9.67 on a scale of 0 to 100, and the brain tumor-specific symptom burden score was 46.9, with a standard deviation of 17.95 on a scale of 0 to 100. There was a significant difference in the global health status score between the first and third visits at 3months (P value = .03). Conclusion: Despite the aggressive and often incurable nature of primary brain tumors, there is hope in the form of palliative care. By addressing unmet symptoms, uncertainties about the future, and social functioning, palliative care can significantly improve the quality of life of these patients.

Menopausal Symptom Burden in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Interaction of Chemotherapy and Ovarian Function Suppression on Tamoxifen Treatment

Menopausal Symptom Burden in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Interaction of Chemotherapy and Ovarian Function Suppression on Tamoxifen Treatment

Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

To systematically synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management on readmission rate, quality of life, symptom burden, anxiety, depression, and mortality in adult cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guideline in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus for studies of randomized controlled trials reporting ePRO-based symptom management from January 1st, 2018, to May 31st, 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed risk-of-bias using Cochrane Risk-of-Bias version 2 and extracted the data. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using the leave-one-out method. The study protocol was registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY) (DOI: https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.6.0010 ). A total of 10 studies were included in our review, comprising a total of 5321 participants. The results showed ePRO-based symptom management can improve quality of life (QOL) (SMD = 4.42, 95% CI 0.14 to 8.69, P = 0.04) in cancer patients. No significant differences in the impact on the improvement of readmission rate (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.04, P = 0.15), symptom burden (SMD = 1.23, 95% CI - 1.34 to 3.79, P = 0.35), anxiety (SMD = - 0.00, 95% CI - 0.34 to 0.34, P = 0.99), depression (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI - 0.17 to 0.24, P = 0.74), and mortality (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.83, P = 0.36) between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, readmission rates more than 30days were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (relative rate (RR) = 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99, P = 0.03). Also, the intervention group's QOL significantly improved compared to the control group when assessed within 1month after the intervention (SMD = 4.35, 95% CI 3.75 to 4.94, P < 0.00001). In the sensitivity analysis, it was found that the results for readmission rates and quality of life (QOL) were unstable, indicating that further research is needed in the future. Cancer patients often have different symptoms. Symptom management in cancer patients is an emerging topic. However, due to the limited numbers of included studies, the long-term effect of ePRO-based symptom management still needed to be validated. inplasy (DOI: https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.6.0010 ).

Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer

Pediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer. To determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days. This randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023. Intervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care. The primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups. A total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care. In this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593525.

Tocilizumab for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Concomitant Cachexia: An Observational Study.

Cancer cachexia significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inflammatory pathways mediated by interleukin-6 (IL-6) play a crucial role in the development of cancer cachexia. This study aimed to investigate the use of tocilizumab in the management of NSCLC with coexisting IL-6-elevated cachexia. In this retrospective study, data were collected from patients with NSCLC and concurrent IL-6-elevated cachexia who received either tocilizumab plus antitumour therapy or antitumour therapy alone. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and improved modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) at Week 12. The secondary endpoints included changes from baseline over 12 weeks in body weight, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and mGPS. Qualitative improvements in patient self-rated appetite and fatigue were reported as exploratory analysis. The study included 49 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and IL-6-elevated cachexia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2-4. Of these, 26 received tocilizumab in combination with antitumour therapy, and 23 received antitumour therapy alone. The majority of these patients were male (87.8%). Baseline characteristics were almost identical between the two groups. The tocilizumab group demonstrated a significantly longer median OS compared to the control group (15.1 vs. 3.2 months; hazard ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.38; p < 0.001). The rate of patients surviving with mGPS improvement at Week 12 was significantly higher in the tocilizumab group than in the control group (risk difference 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.75-1.00; p < 0.001). Over the 12-week period, significant improvements were observed in body weight, albumin, CRP and mGPS in the tocilizumab group compared to the control group (body weight: 5.15 ± 0.53 kg vs. -5.69 ± 0.76 kg, p = 0.041; albumin: 5.89 ± 0.70 g/L vs. -2.97 ± 0.71 g/L, p < 0.001; CRP: -91.50 ± 7.15 mg/L vs. 9.47 ± 13.69 mg/L, p < 0.001; mGPS: -1.61 ± 0.15 vs. 0.03 ± 0.08, p < 0.001). The tocilizumab group also displayed significantly higher rates of improvement in appetite and fatigue (both p < 0.001). The incidence of Grade 3 or higher adverse events was 34.6% in the tocilizumab group compared to 78.3% in the control group. Tocilizumab-related adverse events were observed in three patients (11.5%), including two cases of neutropenia and one case of skin and subcutaneous tissue infection. Tocilizumab demonstrated significant benefits in survival and various clinical parameters, including body weight, albumin, CRP, mGPS and symptom burden in patients with NSCLC and concurrent IL-6-elevated cachexia. Given the existing unmet medical need for effective interventions for cancer cachexia, tocilizumab may be considered as a potential treatment option.

Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Second-Line Chemotherapy Compared with Immunotherapy.

Background and Objectives: The burdened symptomatology accompanying advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with poor prognosis and lower quality of life (QoL). Although both chemotherapy and immunotherapy increase survival, they are still associated with reduced functionality due to their toxicity. This study aimed to estimate the QoL and symptom burden of NSCLC patients receiving second-line chemotherapy compared to patients receiving second-line immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: This comparative, prospective study, conducted from January 2020 to December 2021, included 111 NSCLC patients who were divided into two groups: 61 patients receiving second-line chemotherapy and 50 patients receiving second-line immunotherapy. Patients' QoL and symptom burden were estimated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) (value range 0-100) from treatment cycle 1 to 6. Results: The QoL (mean score > 50) and functionality dimensions (mean score > 50) were moderate to good in both treatment groups, while the symptom burden did not appear to be a serious problem (mean score < 50). From cycle 3 to cycle 5, QoL was significantly better in the immunotherapy group. From cycle 3, the role and social functioning scores were higher in the immunotherapy group, while emotional and cognitive functioning were higher from cycle 2 (p <0.05). The chemotherapy group experienced higher levels of nausea/vomiting, constipation and financial difficulties in all the cycles (p < 0.05). Fatigue and appetite loss were significantly greater from cycle 2 and insomnia was significantly greater from cycle 3. On the contrary, the immunotherapy group experienced higher levels of diarrhea in cycles 5 and 6 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although both therapy groups did not report significantly impaired QoL and severe symptoms, it seems that QoL improved in the immunotherapy group, which reported a lower symptom burden compared to the chemotherapy group.

Decrements in Morning and Evening Energy Are Associated With a Higher Symptom Burden in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers Receiving Chemotherapy.

Decrements in energy are a significant problem associated with chemotherapy. To date, no study examined the variability of energy in patients with gynecologic cancers. To identify distinct morning and evening energy profiles in patients with gynecologic cancers and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, other common symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. A sample of 232 patients with gynecologic cancers completed questionnaires 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct morning and evening energy profiles. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, other common symptoms, and QOL outcomes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests. Three distinct morning (ie, high [9.2%], low [63.1%], very low [27.1%]) and 2 distinct evening (moderate [30.6%], very low [69.4%]) energy classes were identified. Clinical risk factors associated with the worst morning energy profiles included lower functional status and a higher comorbidity burden. Less likely to exercise on a regular basis was the only characteristic associated with the worst evening energy profile. For both symptoms, the worst profiles were associated with higher levels of depression and sleep disturbance, lower levels of cognitive function, and poorer QOL. Approximately 70% of patients with gynecologic cancers experienced decrements in morning and evening energy. The study identified modifiable risk factors associated with more decrements in morning and evening energy. Clinicians can use these findings to identify higher-risk patients and develop individualized energy conservation interventions for these vulnerable patients.

Evaluating Outcomes for Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Palliative Care Consultations, Hospital Charges, and Length of Stay.

Introduction: Women with late-stage metastatic breast cancer are at an increased risk of pain and distress from symptoms and often struggle with associated emotional and financial burden of their disease. Palliative care is known to alleviate symptom burden in patients with end-stage, terminal diseases but is often underutilized in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The current study aims to investigate the prevalence of palliative care consultation on inpatients with metastatic breast cancer and examine the association between palliative care consultation and length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 1998-2017 were abstracted from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Database (NIS). The primary outcome was the presence of a palliative care consultation (PCC) during the inpatient stay. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and total hospital charges. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the presence of a PCC. The relationship between PCC and hospital length of stay and total hospital charges were investigated using linear regression. Results: 513,509 cases of metastatic breast cancer were identified, 5.7% had a documented in-hospital palliative care encounter. Of those who received PCC, total hospital charges were about USD 5452 less than those who did not receive consultation. Women who received PCC had higher odds of a longer hospital stay. Predictors of PCC were older age, non-White race, and residing in a lower-income ZIP code. Conclusions: Palliative care remains to be an underutilized resource among patients with end-stage metastatic breast cancer.

Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms in gastric cancer after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

This study aimed to compare postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms between patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) and Billroth-II with Braun (B-II B) reconstruction. This observational study retrospectively analyzed 151 patients (110 in R-Y group and 41 in B-II B group) who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy from January 2020 to December 2021. A comparison was made regarding surgical outcomes, perioperative nutritional and inflammatory markers, postoperative dietary patterns, and gastrointestinal symptoms between the two groups. The operation time was longer in the R-Y group than the B-II B group (261.00 ± 56.17 min versus 239.88 ± 57.78 min, p = 0.046). However, there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, ASA classification, complications, nutritional and inflammatory indexes, or recovery of postoperative diet between the two groups. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the post-discharge week (PDW) 1 and postoperative month (POM) 1 between the B-II B and R-Y groups. Abdominal distention emerged as the main gastrointestinal symptom burden in patients with gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Both Billroth-II with Braun and R-Y reconstructions exhibited a high and similar incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the short term. Therefore, medical staff should pay attention to the management of gastrointestinal symptoms in these patients postoperatively.

High Symptom Burden in Patients With Advanced Chronic or Prolonged Infectious Diseases: Not Only Pain.

The growing evidence of increased life expectancy in the future reveals the high relevance of frailty in patients with chronic-degenerative diseases; identification and management of symptoms may improve significantly their quality of life. The objective of our study was to assess the symptom burden in patients with advanced chronic or prolonged infectious diseases. A cross-sectional study was performed enrolling 88 patients, referred to palliative care consultation for chronic pain, and evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System to define Total Symptom Distress Score (TSDS) and high symptom burden (HSB) when more than six symptoms along with Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 were present. All participants reported moderate to severe pain; in addition, 86 (97.7%) experienced a lack of well-being, 81 (92%) tiredness, 67 (76.1%) lack of appetite, 66 (75%) drowsiness, 66 (75%) depression, 56 (63.6%) anxiety, 49 (55.6%) nausea, and 39 (44.3%) shortness of breath. Forty-four patients (50%) had high TSDS, greater than 40.5, and presented lower Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) (median 40 vs. 70, p=0.0005), higher comorbidities (median 7 vs. 4, p=0.00001), and higher drug burden (median 9 vs. 6, p=0.0003) than those with low TSDS. Furthermore, considering symptom intensity, 40 patients (45.4%) had HSB and presented lower KPS (median 50 vs. 70, p=0.0005), higher comorbidities (median 7 vs. 4, p=0.00001), and higher drug burden (mean 9 vs. 6, p=0.01) compared to patients without HSB. Our population had an HSB, in addition to pain, revealing high frailty. A correct assessment of symptoms is, therefore, required to manage patients with chronic infectious diseases. In this setting, attention should be given to identifying patients at high risk of HSB through a correct diagnosis and effective management, which should be based on a multi-professional approach.

Worse Psychological Profiles Are Associated With Higher Levels of Stress and Symptom Burden in Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To identify subgroups of patients with distinct psychological profiles at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluate for differences. Online survey of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients completed measures of demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as cancer- and COVID-19-related stress, global stress, social isolation, loneliness, financial toxicity, and common symptoms. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct psychological profiles. Among 1,145 patients, three subgroups were identified (i.e., no anxiety or depression and normative level of resilience; high depression, high anxiety, and low resilience; and very high depression, very high anxiety, and very low resilience). Patients with the two worst psychological profiles were younger, more likely to be female, more recently diagnosed with cancer, and more likely to have breast cancer. Findings may assist clinicians to identify patients at increased risk for significant psychological morbidity and provide more timely, targeted, and cost-effective interventions.

Identification of complex co-occurring symptom burden in persons with cancer through multisite implementation of health-related social needs assessment in community oncology settings.

306 Background: Health related social needs (HRSN) impact cancer outcomes and patient experience, but their integration into routine cancer care is highly variable. To expand the implementation-centered evidence base for effective HRSN assessments, we studied a scalable HRSN screening tool to identify distress and complex symptom burden in patients with cancer. Methods: We prospectively tracked HRSN screenings (using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] Distress Thermometer [DT]) of patients at varying points during their cancer care between 07/2023-12/2023 at seven multi-site community oncology practices within the US Oncology Network. DT responses were used to evaluate the positive finding rate, types of distress reported, and correlations between distress areas and concerns reported. Results: Overall, 219,720 unique patients with cancer received 269,666 HRSN screenings using the NCCN DT; 27% had a distress score ≥1 and 38.5% reported a concern (of whom, 58.2% reported &gt;1). Co-occurring concerns that were most correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient) were emotional &amp; practical concerns in 49% of screenings, physical &amp; practical 44%, emotional &amp; social 37% and social &amp; practical concerns 36%. Emotional symptoms most frequently reported together were sadness/depression + worry/anxiety 47%, loss of interest + sadness/depression 44%, and loneliness &amp; sadness/depression 38.5%. Regarding complex symptom burden, the physical and psychosocial symptoms that were most correlated were fatigue &amp; sleep 43%, pain &amp; fatigue 40%, pain &amp; sleep 38%, anxiety/worry &amp; fatigue 37%, anxiety/worry &amp; sleep 36%. Fatigue and pain, the two most frequently reported concerns were strongly correlated with emotional and practical concerns like sleep, worry or anxiety, memory or concentration, loss or change of physical abilities, sadness or depression, loss of interest or enjoyment, changes in eating, ability to take care of self, feelings of worthlessness or being a burden, etc. Concerns with the strongest correlations are reported in the table. Conclusions: Distress and its components impact multiple cancer outcomes making their rapid identification and consequent action key to high-quality cancer care. The findings highlight the NCCN DT as a scalable approach to integrate HRSN screening and to identify complex symptom burden in the real-world practice. Co-occurring physical and psychosocial concerns. Concern 1 Concern 2 Correlation r Sadness or depression Worry or anxiety 47.3% 0.5 Loss of interest or enjoyment Sadness or depression 44.3% 0.4 Fatigue Sleep 42.5% 0.4 Pain Fatigue 40.0% 0.4 Loneliness Sadness or depression 38.5% 0.4 Pain Sleep 37.8% 0.4 Worry or anxiety Fatigue 36.7% 0.4 Worry or anxiety Sleep 36.1% 0.4 Taking care of myself Taking care of others 35.9% 0.4

Symptom Burden and Health Care Resource Utilization in Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease

Symptom Burden and Health Care Resource Utilization in Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease

Differences in Symptom Burden in Primary Brain Tumor Patients Based on Sex, Race, and Ethnicity: a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Symptom burden affects quality of life and prognosis in primary brain tumor (PBT) patients. Knowing whether symptom burden varies based on sex, race, or ethnicity may affect the interpretation of the relationship between symptoms and survival may reveal issues with applying the tools to measure symptom burden to different groups and may identify inequities in symptom management that need to be addressed at a system level. To determine whether symptoms in PBT patients vary across demographic groups, we conducted a retrospective chart review of symptom burden collected as part of routine care in a diverse population. Patient demographics and scores on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module were extracted from the electronic medical record for patients seen in the Inova Neuro-oncology Clinic between March 2021 and June 2022. MDASI-BT scores were compared based on side of tumor, sex, race, and ethnicity for the entire population and for the subset with gliomas. We included 125 people, of whom 85 had gliomas. For both the entire group and the subgroup with gliomas, about 40% were female and about 40% were non-White race. No differences in symptom burden were seen between males and females. Pain and numbness/tingling symptom burden were higher in both the entire population and the glioma subgroup for people of Hispanic/Latino/Spanish ethnicity and for people of races other than White or Middle Eastern self-identification. Pain, weakness, and numbness/tingling varied significantly across racial and ethnic groups. Further research is needed to validate this finding in other populations and determine its cause.

Leveraging Mobile Health to Improve Capecitabine Adherence Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Oral capecitabine improves convenience compared to intravenous therapies but presents monitoring challenges. We conducted a randomized pilot trial to evaluate a mobile health intervention to remotely monitor capecitabine adherence and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among women with breast cancer. Patients with breast cancer prescribed capecitabine, an oral chemotherapy with a complex, cyclical regimen, were randomly assigned to enhanced usual care (EUC) or PRO arm. Participants were asked to use a smart pill bottle to measure adherence (timing and dose) and complete baseline and 90-day follow-up surveys. PRO participants received text messages for missed or incorrect doses and weekly text-based symptom assessments, and their oncologists received alerts for severe symptoms or missed doses. We compared nonadherence (<80%) and changes from enrollment to follow-up on reported physical and mental health quality-of-life scores and number of severe symptoms by study arm. Overall, 32 women were randomly assigned (17 EUC and 15 PRO): 28 (87.5%) received the intervention and 24 (78.1%) completed the follow-up survey. Among participants who received the intervention, PRO participants responded to 83.3% of symptom questions; 7.7% of PRO participants were nonadherent compared with 40.0% of EUC participants (P = .049). Among those who completed the follow-up survey, 12.5% of PRO participants had reductions in their mental health composite scores compared with 69.2% of EUC participants (P = .011); 10% of PRO participants had more severe symptoms at follow-up compared with 57.1% of EUC participants (P = .019). A mobile health intervention using text message reminders and symptom assessments improved medication adherence and mental health quality-of-life scores and lowered symptom burden of patients with breast cancer prescribed capecitabine. Future work should evaluate the longer-term impacts of this intervention.

Associations of symptom burden with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes among early phase cancer clinical trial (EP-CT) participants.

244 Background: Individuals with cancer often endure a substantial physical and psychological symptom burden. However, little is known about the baseline symptom burden of patients with cancer participating in EP-CTs or the associations of this symptom burden with other PROs and clinical outcomes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled adults with cancer participating in EP-CTs at Massachusetts General Hospital from 4/2021-1/2023. Participants completed baseline surveys prior to EP-CT initiation that assessed symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), quality of life (QOL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), hope (Herth Hope Index), depression/anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]), and financial wellbeing (COST tool, higher scores indicate greater financial wellbeing). We used regression models to explore associations of baseline symptom burden with other PROs (QOL, hope, depression/anxiety, financial wellbeing) and clinical outcomes (time on trial, hospitalizations, overall survival). Results: Among 205 participants (median age=63.3 [range: 31.8-88.6], 57.1% female), the most common cancer types were gastrointestinal (34.6%), breast (20.0%), and head and neck (10.2%). Based on the ESAS, approximately half of participants reported moderate/severe fatigue (50.2%) and poor wellbeing (49.5%). Under half reported moderate/severe drowsiness (35.7%), pain (25.9%), lack of appetite (25.4%), shortness of breath (20.0%), anxiety (18.0%), depression (15.4%), and nausea (9.2%). Higher baseline ESAS total, physical, and psychological scores were associated with worse QOL, lower hope, greater PHQ-4 depression/anxiety symptoms, and worse financial wellbeing (see Table). Higher baseline ESAS scores were associated with decreased time on trial and worse overall survival (see Table). Conclusions: In this study of EP-CT participants, we found associations of baseline symptom burden with other important PROs and clinical outcomes. Specifically, higher baseline symptom burden was associated with decreased QOL, lower hope, increased depression/anxiety symptoms, and diminished financial wellbeing as well as greater risk for shorter time on trial and worse survival. Interventions seeking to enhance care delivery and outcomes for EP-CT participants should strive to address the symptom burden of this population. Outcomes ESAS Total ESAS Physical ESAS Psychological PROs Beta P Beta P Beta P QOL -0.55 &lt;0.001 -0.68 &lt;0.001 -1.93 &lt;0.001 Hope -0.10 &lt;0.001 -0.09 &lt;0.001 -0.53 &lt;0.001 PHQ-4 Depression/Anxiety 0.06 &lt;0.001 0.06 &lt;0.001 0.39 &lt;0.001 Financial Wellbeing -0.13 0.003 -0.16 0.009 -0.36 0.032 Clinical Outcomes HR P HR P HR P Hospitalizations 1.01 0.066 1.02 0.059 1.03 0.290 Time on Trial 1.01 0.069 1.01 0.208 1.04 0.046 Overall Survival 1.02 &lt;0.001 1.03 &lt;0.001 1.04 0.088

A patient report scale research to access the symptom burden in patients with IgA nephropathy

Patients diagnosed with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) commonly experience a substantial burden of symptoms encompassing both physical and psychological aspects. Presently, there's a dearth of standardized assessment tools to effectively gauge the extent of symptom burden in IgAN patients. Therefore, this study aims to devise an IgAN Symptom Assessment Tool that enables a comprehensive evaluation of patient symptom burden and their self-perceived severity. Employing a prospective observational design, this study conducted a survey among patients diagnosed with IgAN at a hospital in China. The research team formulated an IgAN Symptom Burden Assessment Scale and administered a questionnaire to gauge patient symptom burden. Severity assessment was conducted on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a more pronounced burden of symptoms. The finalized scale comprised 14 distinct symptom items, and the questionnaire survey garnered responses from 200 patients, achieving a 100% response rate. Statistical analysis unveiled that nearly all patients regarded these symptoms as prevalent and significantly impactful on their daily lives, resulting in a considerable burden. Notably, mild oliguria, moderate nasal congestion, bitter taste , throat discomfort, alongside severe manifestations such as muscle weakness, fatigue, and foamy urine, were frequently reported by patients. The findings underscore that a substantial proportion of IgAN patients grapple with a significant burden of symptoms, emphasizing the imperative for healthcare providers to prioritize symptom management and implement proactive measures to alleviate these challenges. This study presents an innovative tool tailored for evaluating symptom burden specifically in IgAN patients. Subsequent research should center on validating this tool within larger patient cohorts to optimize the efficacy of symptom management in this demographic.

Correlates and Predictors of Symptom Severity Over Time in People Under Investigation for Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a poorly understood chronic disorder characterized by an unexplained excessive increase in heartbeat upon standing. The aim of this study was to investigate psychosocial and physiological correlates and predictors of symptom severity over time in patients presenting with POTS-like symptoms. Longitudinal cohort study of patients under investigation for POTS ( n = 149). Patients completed questionnaires at 1 month preclinic appointment and 6 months later. Diagnosis, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) measures were collected from medical records. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear multiple regression. Orthostatic and small fiber neuropathy (SFN) symptoms remained stable over time and were significantly correlated with distress, cardiac anxiety, threatening views of the illness, and cognitive-behavioral responses to symptoms, but not with emotional reactivity or social support. Baseline psychosocial factors collectively explained 48% ( F = 5.37, p < .001) of the variance in orthostatic symptoms, and 35% ( F = 3.49, p < .001) of the variance of SFN symptoms at baseline, but a nonsignificant amount of variance in symptoms at 6 months when controlling for baseline symptoms. Hemodynamic measures explained a significant 4% ( F = 3.37, p = .026) of variance of orthostatic symptoms at 6 months. Symptom burden in patients with suspected POTS remained high over 6 months. Psychosocial factors explained a large amount of the variance in symptoms at baseline. As symptoms did not change/improve over time, baseline symptoms accounted for most of the variance in symptoms at 6 months. An integrated approach addressing psychosocial factors alongside medical treatments may promote adjustment to the condition and lessen symptom burden for this group.

Symptom Burden in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: Prevalence and Severity 17 Years Apart.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare data from two cohorts separated by a 17-year interval. We assessed the prevalence and severity of symptoms with the "dialysis symptom index" in these two groups, recruited in 2007 and 2024, to determine how advancements in dialysis therapy have influenced the symptom burden's prevalence and severity. Methods: End-stage renal diseases patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis three times a week in the hemodialysis unit of the university hospital were recruited between February and March 2007. In May 2024, in the same unit, another population sample was recruited and studied, as in 2007. The Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) was administered to each patient, during the dialysis treatment. The DSI is made up of 30 questions, each of which addresses a specific physical or emotional symptom. The total symptom burden score, representing the total number of symptoms reported as being present, and the total symptom severity score, which represents the sum of individual severity scores, were generated for each patient. Results: We studied 71 patients in 2007 and 61 patients in 2024. The demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the two study populations did not differ significantly. The total symptom burden score did not differ significantly between 2007 and 2024. The prevalence of most symptoms was similar in the two groups. The prevalence of constipation, decreased interest in sex and difficulty in becoming sexually aroused was higher in 2024 than in 2007. The total symptom severity was similar in the two periods. The severity of most symptoms was similar in the two groups. The severity of decreased interest in sex and difficulty in becoming sexually aroused was higher in 2024 than in 2007. Conclusions: The present study shows that, 17 years apart, the prevalence and severity of the symptom burden in patients on maintenance hemodialysis did not change significantly. These results suggest that studies investigating the causes and the pathogenesis of symptoms of patients on maintenance hemodialysis are urgently needed in the next future, as well as studies on therapeutic strategies.

Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Patients With Heart Failure Using Patient Reported Outcomes

ContextHeart failure (HF) is considered a multifaceted and life-threatening syndrome characterized by high symptom-burden and significant mortality. ObjectivesTo describe the symptom-burden in patients with HF and identify their palliative care needs. In this respect, symptom burden related to sex, age and classification of HF using New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA) were analyzed. MethodsA cross-sectional questionnaire survey included adult HF patients according to NYHA II, III, and IV. Palliative care needs were assessed using validated patient reported outcomes measures; SF-36v1, HeartQoL, EORTC- QLQ-C15-PAL, MFI-20 and HADS. Patients were recruited from the Department of Cardiology, North Zealand Hospital, Denmark. ResultsIn total, 314 patients (79%) completed the questionnaire (233 men). Mean age = 74 years (range 35–94 years). In all, 42% had NYHA III or IV and 53% self-rated their health to be fair or poor. In all, 19% NYHA II and 67% NYHA III/IV patients had ≥4 severe palliative symptoms according to EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL. In addition, NYHA III/IV had a mean of 8.9 symptoms and a mean of 5.4 severe symptoms. Women, older patients, and those with NYHA III/IV had worse outcomes regarding health-related quality of life, functional capacity, and symptom burden. ConclusionsPatients with HF have a high prevalence of symptoms and, thus, potential palliative care needs. Predominantly, women, older patients, and those with higher severity of disease have the highest symptom burden. PROMs can help cardiologists address the palliative care needs and systematic assessment may be a prerequisite to integrate symptom-modifying and palliative care interventions.