With the diminishing of conventional high-quality oil resources and the advancement of both thermal and non-thermal recovery techniques for heavy oil, the development of heavy and ultra-heavy oil resources is becoming economically feasible. To address some of the reservoir challenges, such as the high heat loss and steam injection costs when using thermal recovery techniques in deep heavy oil reservoirs, as well as the prohibitive cost of CO2 injection when applying non-thermal techniques in heavy oil reservoirs located far from CO2 sources, this study explores the potential application of viscosity reducer-assisted CO2/N2 huff-n-puff (HnP) technique. The effect of different types of gases (N2, CO2 and hybrid N2/CO2) and viscosity reducers is evaluated by analyzing the pressure change, oil recovery rate and oil recovery factor in sandpack models. The results show that 96.62% and 60.75% viscosity reduction is achieved by the water-soluble viscosity reducer ASD-J-202 and the oil-soluble viscosity reducer KR-4, respectively. The oil recovery factors for the hybrid gas and CO2 gas are 17.98% and 18.58%, respectively, in presence of KR-4. In addition, high-quality, stable foamy oil is observed during production coupled with increased formation energy and reduced viscosity. For these runs, the residual oil at the injection end drops to 38.7%. During the soaking stage, N2 dominates the pore space while CO2 gradually diffuses to the distal end, dissolves in the heavy oil, causing oil swelling and increasing the sweep efficiency and oil recovery.
Read full abstract