Background and AimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used for closure of gastrointestinal (GI) lesions following endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection. Generally, a large defect is left that can increase the risk of postprocedural bleeding or perforation, and has been managed by techniques such as endoscopic placement of clips to reapproximate the defect edges. An over the scope suturing system (OSS), Overstitch created by Apollo endosurgery, has been designed for similar utility in ESD closure. Its design intent aimed for full thickness closure and exchange of suture without endoscopic removal. This paper aims to evaluate the technical success and efficacy of use of OSS in the closure of ESD. MethodsA comprehensive literature review across multiple databases was performed. Studies including Overstitch and ESD information were evaluated, with 7 articles meeting predetermined eligibility of quality for inclusion. Statistical analysis was completed using CMV v 3.0 software. The primary evaluated endpoint was technical success and efficacy of instrument use in patients undergoing ESD closure with OSS. The secondary evaluated endpoint was the overall rate of adverse events related to the use of OSS. ResultsOverall, the pooled rates for instrumental efficacy and technical success were 95.8% (95% CI: 80.6%, 99.2%; P=0.04) and 99.2% (95% CI: 79.8%, 100.0%; P=1.00), respectively. The pooled rate of adverse events was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.0%, 24.8%; P=0.99) with pain reported as the most common adverse event. ConclusionsThe OSS system appears to be an effective and safe tool in the closure of defects after ESD. However, its design also makes it quite large and difficult to maneuver. While it allows for replacement of the suture kit without endoscopic removal, there have been multiple reported episodes of device failure. Further randomized controlled trials warranted as OSS becomes more widely used.