You have accessJournal of UrologyPediatrics1 Apr 2012V541 ROBOTIC INTRAVESICAL URETEROCELE EXCISION Brian Rosman, Courtney Rowe, Alan Retik, and Hiep Nguyen Brian RosmanBrian Rosman Boston, MA More articles by this author , Courtney RoweCourtney Rowe Boston, MA More articles by this author , Alan RetikAlan Retik Boston, MA More articles by this author , and Hiep NguyenHiep Nguyen Boston, MA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.615AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Ureterocele excision is a procedure that is typically performed in an open fashion. The robotic approach has many challenges associated with it, as well as many advantages. This video will demonstrate several techniques, including bladder fixation and port closure techniques, which can make a robotic approach a feasible, safe, and effective option for ureterocele excision. METHODS A suitable patient was selected that had a large enough bladder, clinical indication for ureterocele excision, and interest in a robotic approach. The patient had a right sided congenital multicystic kidney without much function, and underwent a right nephroureterectomy previously. He had recurrent episodes of hematuria, and a ureterocele was identified. The ureterocele was a simple orthotopic stenotic ureterocele, seen on VCUG as a filling defect, and confirmed cystoscopically. The decision was made to definitively treat the ureterocele after cystoscopic de-roofing failed to relieve the symptoms. After cystoscopy was performed, two stay sutures were placed through the rectus muscle and all bladder layers to hitch the bladder to the abdominal wall during the procedure. This prevented the bladder from falling away from the abdominal wall during surgery, and pulling out the robotic ports. The ports were placed, along with a Veress needle. The bladder was drained of urine and insufflated, and the camera and instruments placed. The ureterocele was identified, and excised with monopolar scissors. The defect in the detrusor muscle was closed in two layers. This patient had a previous nephroureterectomy on the ipsilateral side, therefore no re-implant was required. The ports were removed, and the port holes closed using a “suture suspension disc”. This disc was used before port placement, and acts as a stencil for proper port and suture placement, ensuring that the preplaced sutures are able to tightly close the port site. RESULTS This patient did very well post-operatively, with minimal pain, quick return to eating and drinking and ambulating, and was discharged from the hospital 24 hours after his procedure. He had no further hematuria or obstructive symptoms on repeat follow-up examinations. CONCLUSIONS With the techniques detailed in this video, the difficulties of robotic ureterocele excision can be easily overcome, allowing the benefits of the minimally invasive approach to be applied to intravesical ureterocele excision. Robotic intravesical ureterocele excision is a safe and effective procedure. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e222 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Brian Rosman Boston, MA More articles by this author Courtney Rowe Boston, MA More articles by this author Alan Retik Boston, MA More articles by this author Hiep Nguyen Boston, MA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract