Suture Repair Techniques Research Articles

Endoscopic double line suture repair technique for repairing Iatrogenic dural tear: a technical case report.

Introducing a suture repair technology, endoscopic double line suture repair technique, for iatrogenic dural injury during Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) surgery. A patient with dural injury and cauda equina herniation during PELD surgery was treated with endoscopic double line suture repair technique. A patient with dural injury and cauda equina nerve herniation during PELD surgery was successfully treated using double-line suture technique. After the repair, no obvious cerebrospinal fluid leakage and cauda equina nerve re-herniation was seen. During the postoperative observation period, the wound healed well and there were no complications related to cerebrospinal leakage. During the follow-up period (1 year), the patient reported significant symptom relief and no complications. This novel dural repair technology is safe and effective and can be used to treat dural injuries during PELD surgery.

Significantly smaller lateral extrusion was observed within 24 weeks after all-inside suture repairs of radial tear in the middle segment of lateral meniscus compared to inside-out repairs.

To evaluate the postoperative meniscal extrusion between all-inside suture (AIS) and trans-capsular suture (TCS) repair techniques. Thirteen patients (mean age, 19.4 years) underwent AIS repairs using only sutures (AIS group) for radial tears in the middle segment of the lateral meniscus (RTMLM), and seven patients (mean age, 20.3 years) underwent inside-out repairs among TCS (TCS group). For all cases, lateral (LE), anterior (AE) and posterior (PE) meniscal extrusions of the lateral meniscus were measured during preoperative and 3-, 12- and 24-week postoperative MRIs. Then, the change of each extrusion from preoperative to each postoperative period was calculated as ∆LE, ∆AE and ∆PE. There was no significant difference between the AIS and TCS groups in the preoperative extrusions. As for postoperative extrusions, only ∆LEs in the AIS group was significantly smaller than those in the TCS group at all postoperative periods (-1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mm at 3-week, -0.9 ± 0.9 vs. 0.4 ± 0.9 mm at 12-week and -0.3 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 1.1 mm at 24-week postoperation). In ∆AEs and ∆PEs, at all three postoperative periods, there were no significant differences. Postoperative LE, AE and PE on MRIs after AIS and TCS repairs for RTMLM were investigated. Significantly smaller lateral extrusion was observed within 24 weeks after AIS repairs of RTMLM compared to TCS repairs, which could lead to stabilization of the repair site and prevent degenerative changes. Case-control study, retrospective comparative study, Level Ⅲ.

Microinvasive intrascleral double continuous suture repair surgery for cyclodialysis clefts.

The traditional suturing method for cyclodialysis cleft usually requires an incision in the sclera for direct suturing, resulting in greater damage and a high risk of postoperative complications. The purpose of this work is to propose a newly intrascleral double continuous suture repair technique for the treatment of cyclodialysis clefts. Seven patients with cyclodialysis cleft underwent microinvasive intrascleral double continuous suture repair surgery to restore the attachment of the detached ciliary body to the sclera without scleral incision. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit lamp and corneal examination results, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) results were recorded. Closure of the cyclodialysis cleft was achieved in 7 eyes and no obvious complications occurred after the operation. Intraocular pressure increased from preoperatively 6.8 ± 1.35 mmHg (range: 4.8-8.0 mmHg) to postoperatively 12.5 ± 4.0 mmHg (range: 8.0-20.0 mmHg) (paired sample T test, P < 0.01). Best-corrected Snellen visual acuity improved from preoperatively range 20/2000-20/63 to range 20/200-20/25 at final follow-up. In short, intrascleral double continuous suture repair surgical is safe and effective in treating cyclodialysis cleft, with minimal surgical trauma.

The Direct Tendon Suture and Paratenon Repair Technique for Acute Tendinous Mallet Finger: A Case Series.

(1) Introduction: Tendinous mallet finger is a frequent deformity that occurs after an extensor tendon injury during sports or daily life activities. Despite the existence of numerous non-operative and operative techniques to address this deformity, there is a controversy on its optimal management. In this study, we aimed to present a direct tendon suture technique using the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint open approach for treating tendinous mallet finger injury. (2) Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, 19 patients with closed non-fracture tendinous mallet fingers underwent the direct tendon and paratenon repair technique. After skin incision, we opened the paratenon with lazy S shape incision and found the ruptured proximal and distal tendon ends. We reapproximated the tendons using a simple interrupted suture with Prolene #6/0. After that, we meticulously performed paratenon repair using PDS #6/0 for preventing readherence. Temporary trans-articular Kirschner wire fixation was used for 4 weeks. (3) Results: All patients were followed-up for 3-8 months (mean: 4.8 months). The mean final extension lag was 6.5 degrees, and the overall rate of cases with excellent and good outcomes using Crawford's criteria was 85%. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, this surgical approach could be a reliable alternative for the treatment of tendinous mallet finger injuries.

An early case of successful peripheral nerve repair in 1880: Francis L. Parker, MD.

The modern technique of epineural suture repair, along with a detailed reporting of functional restoration, came from Carl Hueter in 1873. While there is extensive information on peripheral nerve surgery throughout recorded history leading up to the 1800s, little early American scientific literature is available. While Schwann, Nissl, and Waller were publishing their work on nerve anatomy and physiology, Francis LeJau Parker was born. The South Carolina native would go on to describe one of the first American cases of peripheral nerve repair with the restoration of function. Francis Parker was born in 1836 in Abbeville, South Carolina. He gained local notoriety as one of the first American surgeons to suture a severed nerve, resulting in restored function. The case dates back to 1880, when a patient presented to his clinic with severing of the posterior interosseous nerve. The details of this case come from the archives of the South Carolina Medical Association. The authors reviewed these records in detail and provide a case description of nerve repair not previously reported in the modern literature. The history, neurological examination, and details of the case provide insight into the adroit surgical skills of Dr. Parker.

Outcomes for 15 cats with bilateral sacroiliac luxation treated with transiliosacral toggle suture repair.

To report a surgical technique and outcomes of transiliosacral toggle suture repair to treat feline bilateral sacroiliac luxation/fracture (SILF). Retrospective study. Fifteen client-owned cats. The medical records of cats with bilateral SILF treated using a transiliosacral toggle suture repair were reviewed. Short- and medium-term outcomes were assessed through standard postoperative clinical evaluation and radiographs, including measurements of angle of deviation (AoD), percentage of reduction (PoR), and pelvic canal width ratio (PCWR). Long-term functional follow up was obtained from a questionnaire derived from the Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index (FMPI). Fifteen cats were enrolled retrospectively, among which 13 survived to discharge. One minor wound complication, treated by secondary intention healing, was encountered. No major complication was reported. Immediately postoperatively, the mean absolute PoR values were 88.1 ± 11.2% and 91 ± 11.6% on the right and left side, respectively. The mean absolute AoD was 3.1 ± 2.8°, and the mean PCWR was 1.24 ± 0.08. The medium-term radiographic follow up at a median of 205 (71-682) days postsurgery revealed the good stability of the repair. Excellent functional outcomes were identified upon the analysis of 12 long-term questionnaires at a median of 365 (119-798) days postsurgery. Anatomic reduction was satisfactory and comparable with previously described techniques with good implant placement documented. Functional outcomes based on FMPI-derived questionnaires were good to excellent in our population. Transiliosacral toggle suture stabilization of bilateral SILF was associated with good outcomes in cats. Further studies are required to compare biomechanical properties and outcomes between this technique and previously described transiliosacral stabilization.

Evaluation of the All-Inside Technique for the Repair of Lateral Meniscus Root Tears at 1 Year After ACL Reconstruction.

The presence of a lateral meniscus root tear (LMRT) in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear makes the knee more unstable and increases the risk of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis. An all-inside suture repair technique without bone tunnels has been proposed to treat LMRT. To compare the 1-year postoperative findings between patients who underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LMRT repair (LMRT group) and patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (control group). Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. The LMRT group consisted of 19 patients, and the control group consisted of 56 patients. In this study, the authors compared the postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (meniscal extrusion, ghost sign, and hyperintensity in the tibial plateau beneath the LMRT), functional outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, and Tegner scores), and reoperation rate between groups. The primary endpoint was analyzed by comparing, in the LMRT group, the 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) of the mean lateral meniscal extrusion at 1 year to the limit of noninferiority (fixed at 0.51). To take into account imbalanced baseline characteristics between groups, adjusted mean meniscal extrusion (with 1-sided 97.5% CI) was assessed using a linear regression model. The mean follow-up was 12.2 months (range, 7.7-14.7 months) in the control group and 11.5 months (range, 7.1-13.0 months) in the LMRT group (P = .06). For meniscal extrusion, the LMRT group was noninferior to the control group. The mean meniscal extrusion was 2.19 mm (97.5% CI, -infinity to 2.68 mm) in the LMRT group and 2.03 mm (97.5% CI,-infinity to 2.27 mm) in the control group, indicating that the upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI in the LMRT group was less than the noninferiority threshold of 2.78 (ie, 2.27 mm + 0.51 mm = 2.78 mm). There was a statistically significant difference in the IKDC score between the LMRT and control groups (77.2 ± 8.1 vs 80.3 ± 7.3, respectively; P = .04). There was no between-group difference in the other MRI parameters, the Lysholm and Tegner scores, or the reoperation rate. There was no significant difference in extrusion on MRI or clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with all-inside LMRT repair compared with patients who did not have an LMRT.

Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair With Peripheral Stabilization Stitch

Background: Posteromedial meniscal root tears occur when the meniscal root detaches from the tibial plateau, which limits the native functionality of the meniscus, alters tibiofemoral contact forces, and can progress to meniscal extrusion. Untreated meniscal root tears with meniscal extrusion have been associated with significant articular cartilage loss and accelerated progression of osteoarthritis. Recent biomechanical evidence suggests restoring the contact area with the use of a peripheral stabilization suture at the posteromedial aspect of the tibial plateau. Indications: Meniscal root repair with a peripheral stabilization suture is indicated by clinical and radiographic evidence of complete detachment of the posteromedial meniscus root with significant meniscal extrusion outside the joint. Technique Description: This technique uses 2 tunnels for the meniscal root repair as well as a single additional transtibial tunnel for the peripheral stabilization suture. The described technique demonstrates a peripheral release along the meniscocapsular junction to allow the meniscus to be reapproximated to its anatomical attachment site. This is followed by transtibial tunnel preparation to allow suture passage for the meniscal root repair and an additional transtibial tunnel is created for the peripheral stabilization suture. After stabilization of the extruded meniscus, the suture is tied down over a cortical fixation device on the anteromedial tibia. Results: Significant improvement has been reported by clinical studies after the transtibial pullout repair method; however, structural outcomes have shown conflicting results. Kaplan et al reported patients treated with transtibial suture pullout technique with 2 locking cinch sutures had improved clinical outcomes, but increased extrusion of the medial meniscus compared with the preoperative state, whereas Kim et al reported a decrease in meniscal extrusion following pullout suture repair technique. Discussion: Posteromedial meniscus root repair using a peripheral stabilization suture is an effective surgical technique to restore the contact pressures of the knee and limit the amount of meniscal extrusion. This allows for appropriate correction of hoop stress to prevent further cartilage loss and progression of osteoarthritis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations.

Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N ± 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler-Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N ± 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N ± 14 N and 37, 5 ± 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler-Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone-anchor interface was seen. Clinical relevance: Since primary suture repair techniques of ACL tears have been abandoned because of inconsistent results, ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard of treating ACL tears. However, with the latest improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, hardware and imaging, primary ACL suture repair might be a treatment option for a select group of patients. By establishing an arthroscopic technique in which proximal ACL avulsion can be reattached, the original ACL can be preserved by using a knotless anchor and a threefold suture configuration. Nevertheless, this technique provides an inferior ultimate failure load compared to graft techniques, so a careful rehabilitation program must be followed if using this technique in vivo.

Krackow Stitch and Whipstitch Use in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Repair: A Porcine Composite Bone Biomechanical Study.

The suture combination of a Krackow stitch plus a whipstitch can be used to strengthen a tendon rupture repair. We compared biomechanical outcomes of suture repair techniques for distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single Krackow stitch with and without a whipstitch and a whip-stitch alone. Data were obtained from 36 thawed porcine flexor profundus tendons. A cortical button was secured to fourth-generation composite bone using No. 2 FiberWire (Arthrex) and No. 2 FiberLoop (Arthrex). The primary outcome was maximum load to failure. Secondary outcomes were displacement at the bone-tendon interface, total construct elongation, and stiffness. The Krackow plus whipstitch group (mean, 493.82 N; SD, 209.44 N) had a greater maximum load to failure as compared with the single Krackow group (mean, 333.71 N; SD, 172.32 N) (P=.01) and single whipstitch group (mean, 207.27 N; SD, 66.42 N) (P<.001). The single Krackow group (mean, 1.67 mm; SD, 0.89 mm) had a greater bone-tendon interface displacement (P=.01) after preloading and before cyclic loading than the single whipstitch group (mean, 0.83 mm; SD, 0.58 mm). There were no other secondary outcome differences between groups. A repair using Krackow plus whipstitch is biomechanically stronger with no difference in bone-tendon interface displacement, total construct elongation, or stiffness when compared with a single Krackow or single whipstitch. We recommend this repair technique for distal biceps tendon rupture repair, which may accelerate rehabilitation and decrease re-rupture rate. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):224-229.].

Suture hook versus all-inside repair for longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus concomitant to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A matched-pair analysis

Secondary meniscectomy rates after longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus repair performed concomitantly to ACL reconstruction are as high as 25% with all-inside repair technique. Posteromedial suture hook repair is an emerging technique; however, it is unknown whether it confers a significantly reduced secondary meniscectomy rate. Patients with longitudinal tears of the PHMM who underwent meniscal repair during primary ACLR between January 2011 and December 2015 were eligible for the study. Patients undergoing suture hook repair were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent all-inside repair. At the end of the study period, secondary meniscectomy rates were determined. The study population comprised 237 matched pairs. The mean follow-up was 97.7 6 17.3 months. Patients who underwent an all-inside repair had a .2-fold higher failure rate compared with patients who underwent suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal (31.2% vs. 15.6%; p = .0003). Patients in the suture hook repair group undergoing additional ALLR demonstrated a 3-fold higher meniscal repair survival rate compared with all other subgroups ( p = .0014). This association was not seen in the all-inside repair group. The only statistically significant risk factor for meniscal repair failure was the suture repair technique (hazard ratio, 2.133 [95% CI, 1.383–3.292]; p = .0008). Suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal is associated with lower secondary meniscectomy rate when compared with the all-inside repair of longitudinal tears of the PHMM performed at the time of ACLR. Patients in the suture hook repair group who underwent additional ALLR had a significantly better meniscal repair survivorship.

Cyclic Testing of a Modified Pull-Out Suture Repair Technique for Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion in a Turkey Foot Model.

Background: Numerous repair techniques have been described for closed flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsion. One option is a pull-out suture tied over the nail plate (Bunnell repair). We modified the Bunnell repair by incorporating a portion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint volar plate into the repair to improve strength and reduce gapping. The aim of this study is to compare gap formation and load to failure between the Bunnell repair and our modification in a turkey foot model. Methods: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric turkey feet were divided into two repair groups namely the conventional Bunnell pull-out suture technique and the modified Bunnell pull-out suture technique, incorporating the middle-third of the DIP joint volar plate into the repair. Both repairs were carried out with 3-0 prolene suture and underwent ex-vivo cyclic loading at 2-12 n in a sinusoidal wave for 100 cycles to simulate a passive range of motion (ROM) protocol. Subsequently, specimens were loaded to failure at 12 mm/minute. Gap formation and load to failure were measured. Results: No repair ruptures occurred during cyclical testing. Mean gap formation was 9.2 mm (±1.49) in the Bunnell repair, and 3.5 mm (±1.19) in the modified Bunnell repair (p < 0.0001). The mean load to failure for the Bunnell repair was 35.4 n compared to 45 n for the modified repair (p = 0.0017). Conclusions: Gap formation was reduced and load to failure increased by augmenting the Bunnell pull-out suture repair with the central portion of the DIP joint volar plate.

Suture Hook Versus All-Inside Repair for Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus Concomitant to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group

Background: Secondary meniscectomy rates after repair of longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) performed concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are reported to be as high as 25% with an all inside repair technique. Posteromedial portal suture hook repair is an emerging technique; however, it is unknown whether it confers a significantly reduced secondary meniscectomy rate compared with the current gold standard. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study was to compare the secondary meniscectomy rates of suture hook repair and all inside repair for longitudinal tears of the PHMM performed concomitant to ACLR. The secondary outcome was to determine the risk factors associated with the failure of the repair. It was hypothesized that repair with an all inside device would be associated with higher secondary meniscectomy rates when compared with suture hook repair and that concomitant anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) would confer improved meniscal repair survivorship. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with longitudinal tears of the PHMM who underwent meniscal repair during primary ACLR between January 2011 and December 2015 at our institution were eligible for the study. Patients undergoing suture hook repair were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent all inside repair. At the end of the study period, secondary meniscectomy rates were determined. Results: The study population comprised 237 matched pairs. The mean follow up was 97.7 ± 17.3 months. Patients who underwent an all inside repair had a >2-fold higher failure rate compared with patients who underwent suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal (31.2% vs 15.6%; P = .0003). Patients in the suture hook repair group undergoing additional ALLR demonstrated a >3-fold higher meniscal repair survival rate compared with all other subgroups (P = .0014). This association was not seen in the all inside repair group. The only statistically significant risk factor for meniscal repair failure was the suture repair technique (hazard ratio, 2.133 [95% CI, 1.383-3.292]; P = .0008). Conclusion: Suture hook repair through a posteromedial portal is associated with a significantly lower secondary meniscectomy rate when compared with the all inside meniscal repair of longitudinal tears of the PHMM performed at the time of ACLR. Furthermore, patients in the suture hook repair group who underwent an additional ALLR had a significantly better meniscal repair survivorship compared with all other subgroups.

Comparative evaluation of the advantages of single-layer closure to en-masse closure in the surgeries of the abdomen

Background: Closure of the abdomen is a vital step in abdominal surgeries, with advent of newer techniques for suturing and suture material, repair technique, and incision, which has evoked great interest among surgeons.Aim: To comparatively evaluate the advantages of single-layer closure to en-masse closure in the surgeries of the abdomen.Subjects and Methods: 64 subjects randomly divided into two groups of 32 subjects each where Group I was closed with single-layer closure, and, Group II with layered closure. The subjects were assessed postoperatively on days 1, 3, 7, and 10, and were compared for burst abdomen, infection, and operative time. The follow-up was done every month for first 3 months and then after 6 months.Results: Wound infection incidence was higher in Group II (layer closure) compared to Group I (mass closure). In the Group I, elective surgery group, wound infection was seen in 1 subject with an abdomen burst. In emergency surgery group, wound infection was seen in no subject with abdomen burst and subjects without abdomen burst. In Group II (layered closure), in elective surgery group, wound infection was seen in 5 study subjects.

Lateral Meniscus Allograft Transplantation in a Skeletally Immature Patient

Background: Lateral meniscus deficiency in young patients typically results from irreparable lateral meniscus tears, often associated with discoid meniscus. Such cases present a challenging clinical scenario given the known natural history of meniscus deficiency leading to degenerative lateral knee compartment changes. Managing this problem in a skeletally immature patient presents additional clinical and surgical considerations. Indications: Lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (LMAT) is indicated in patients with prior total or subtotal lateral meniscectomy resulting from irreparable lateral meniscus tears, with the goal of providing chondroprotection to the lateral compartment of the knee. Patients are assessed preoperatively for ligamentous stability of the knee, mechanical alignment, and associated chondral injuries to determine whether secondary procedures may be indicated. Technique Description: We present an all-arthroscopic technique for LMAT using small bone plugs in the anterior and posterior meniscus roots secured through 2 separate anatomic root drill tunnels tied over a bone bridge. The meniscus allograft is further secured using an outside-in suture repair technique. Special attention is given to meniscus allograft preparation, anatomic meniscus root identification, and drilling using a minimally disruptive transphyseal technique. Graft passage, suture management, and meniscus fixation and repair are also highlighted. Results: Anticipated outcomes from LMAT in skeletally mature patients are excellent, particularly if preexisting chondral degenerative changes are not present. Prior studies with greater than 7-year follow-up in adolescent patients undergoing meniscus allograft transplantation have shown reoperation rates of less than 6% with no growth disturbances noted, with most patients able to return to their prior level of sport. Computed tomography modeling data using this technique shows a proximal tibial physeal surface area disruption of less than 2.5%; therefore, the risk of growth disturbance is very low. Discussion/Conclusion: The surgical technique demonstrated here offers a safe and effective approach for the management of lateral meniscus deficiency after subtotal lateral meniscectomy for irreparable meniscus tears in skeletally immature patients. The chondroprotective effect of the lateral meniscus can be restored with an anatomically placed lateral meniscus allograft with minimal disruption to the proximal tibial physis.

Non-Anatomical Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear to Posterior Cruciate Ligament for Patients with Normal Lower Limb Alignment.

ObjectiveTo describe a non‐anatomical arthroscopic all‐inside repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) technique for patients with normal lower limb alignment and to evaluate the short‐term clinical and radiologic outcomes.MethodsMMPRT directly to PCL was repaired with all‐inside horizontal mattress suturing technique rather than by the transtibial pullout suture technique or anchor suturing repair technique in 20 Laparade Type II MMPRT patients with normal lower limb alignment during 2018–2019. The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated retrospectively for at least 2 years follow‐up. The VAS score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow‐up. The status of the medial meniscus posterior root were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively and at the final follow‐up.ResultsTwenty patients (mean age 54.5 ± 19.5 years) were included in the present study. The mean follow‐up duration was 32.5 ± 5.8 months. The VAS score was significantly decreased from preoperative 6.5 ± 1.5 to 2.1 ± 1.4 at the final follow‐up (P < 0.01). The mean Lysholm score was significantly improved from 43.7 ± 10.9 preoperatively to 85.7 ± 10.8 (P < 0.01). The median Tegner activity score was improved from 1.0 (range 1–4) to 3.0 (range 2–4, P < 0.01). On MRI, a total of 12 cases (60%) had complete healing, while eight cases (40%) had partial healing.ConclusionNon‐anatomical arthroscopic all‐inside repair of MMPRT to PCL may yield beneficial clinical outcomes and a higher rate of clinical healing in Type II MMPRT patients with normal lower limb alignment. It is an easy and reliable alternative technique to the transtibial pullout suture or anchor suture repair technique.

Locking suture repair versus ligament augmentation—a biomechanical study regarding the treatment of acute lateral collateral ligament injuries of the elbow

BackgroundLateral collateral ligament (LCL) tears are frequently observed in fractures and dislocations of the elbow. Recent biomechanical evidence suggests that additional ligament augmentation may improve repair stability. The aim of this biomechanical in-vitro study was to compare the resistance of a locking suture repair of the LCL with a ligament augmentation technique.Material and methodsEight fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were evaluated for stability against varus/posterolateral rotatory forces (3 Nm). A strain gauge (µm/m; negative values) was placed at the origin and insertion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and cyclic loading was performed for 1000 cycles. We analyzed three distinct scenarios: (A) native LCL, (B) locking transosseou suture repair of the LCL, (C) simple LCL repair with additional ligament augmentation of the LUCL.ResultsThe mean measured strain was − 416.1 µm/m (A), − 618 µm/m (B) and − 288.5 µm/m (C) with the elbow flexion at 90°; the strain was significantly higher in scenario B compared to C (p = .01). During the cyclic load (1000) the mean measured strain was − 523.1 µm/m (B) and − 226.3 µm/m (C) with the elbow flexion at 60°; the strain was significantly higher in scenario B compared to C (p = .01). No significant difference between the first and the last cycles was observed (p = .09; p = .07). One failure of the LCL repair was observed after 1000 cycles; none of the ligament augmentations failed.ConclusionLigament augmentation (C) provides higher resistance compared to the native LCL (A) and to the locking suture repair technique (B). Both techniques, however, hold up during 1000 cycles. While ligament augmentation might enhance the primary stability of the repair, future clinical studies have to show whether this increase in resistance leads to negative effects like higher rates of posttraumatic elbow stiffness.Level of evidenceBasic science study, biomechanics.

Fixation of distal clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular instability: acomparative biomechanical study in human cadavers.

BackgroundThe need for coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization in the fixation of fractures with CC instability (Neer type IIB and V) was biomechanically demonstrated by higher construct strength than isolated locking plate osteosynthesis. It was the purpose of this study to prove noninferiority of the new cow-hitch suture repair technique compared with the well-established suture tape double-button fixation with regard to overall fixation strength and cyclic loading properties.MethodsTwelve human cadaver shoulders (7 right and 5 left) were matched for sex and age (mean age: 75 ± 5 years). An oblique parasagittal fracture line 20 mm medial to the acromioclavicular joint line was created, and the CC ligaments were dissected. Six shoulders were reconstructed by a double FiberTape fixation with two suture buttons (group DB), and the remaining six shoulders by a cow-hitch suture repair using a double FiberWire with only coracoid button fixation (group CH). Both reconstruction techniques were tested in a servo-hydraulic material testing machine for cyclic displacement (mm), stiffness (N/mm), and maximum load-to-failure (N) after 500 cycles at 3 mm/s and inferosuperior load between 15 and 70 N. Superior fragment displacement in space was recorded using a MicroScribe digitizer.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences regarding cyclic displacement (group DB: 0.7 mm; group CH: 1.3 mm; P = .36), stiffness (group DB: 177 N/mm; group CH: 116 N/mm; P = .17), maximum load-to-failure (group DB: 560 N; group CH: 492 N; P = .59), and superior displacement in space of the medial fragment (group DB: 3.2 mm; group CH: 1.6 mm; P = .48).ConclusionFixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures using a double FiberWire cow-hitch suture repair with isolated coracoid button fixation for stand-alone CC stabilization resulted in similar biomechanical properties to a double-suture button fixation with FiberTapes while avoiding prominent clavicular implants.

A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model

The Krackow technique has the advantage of high strength, though it is not minimally invasive. The "Locking Block Modified Krackow" (LBMK) peri-tendon fixation technique was designed for minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of LBMK with Kessler and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) techniques using a simulated early rehabilitation program. Thirty-fresh bovine Achilles tendon specimens were randomly assigned to the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups (n = 10). In LBMK group, the main suture configuration was the LBMK technique, and the transverse suture was used as the secondary suture configuration. The Kessler group employed three suture configurations, two sagittal, one coronal plane. In the PARS group, two transverse and one locking sutures were placed at either end of the tendon. Each repaired specimen underwent two cyclic loading protocols (20-100N, 20-190N), 500 cycles, followed by measurement of the gap between the tendon ends. All specimens underwent a load-to-failure test at a 25mm/s stretching rate. After the first loading cycle, the average gaps of the LBMK, Kessler and PARS groups were 0.76 ± 0.44mm, 1.80 ± 0.82mm, and 2.66 ± 1.04mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The LBMK group gaps were all within 2mm. The Kessler and PARS groups had six, and two specimens within 2mm, respectively. After the second loading cycle, the average end gaps of the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups were 3.68 ± 1.08mm, 5.70 ± 0.89mm and 7.59 ± 1.26mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced average gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The maximum load-to-failure was highest 732.8 ± 138N in the LBMK than the other groups (p < 0.01). The biomechanical strength of the LBMK suture was significantly greater than Kessler and PARS. The reduced gap in the LBMK group suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during early postoperative rehabilitation.

O’Donoghue Sports Injury Award: Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair is Non-Inferior to Autograft ACL Reconstruction at 2-Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives:Preclinical studies and an early clinical cohort study have suggested that for complete midsubstance ACL injuries, the technique of suture repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmented with a protein implant placed in the gap between the torn ends (bridge-enhanced ACL repair) may be a viable alternative to ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that patients treated with bridge-enhanced ACL repair would have non-inferior patient reported outcomes and anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and superior hamstring strength at 2 years after surgery when compared with subjects who had ACL reconstruction with autograft.Study Design:Prospective Randomized Control Trial (NCT02664545).Methods:One hundred patients, ages 13 to 35, with complete mid-substance ACL injuries, were enrolled and underwent surgery within 45 days of injury. Sixty-five patients were randomized to receive a bridge-enhanced ACL repair (BEAR group) and 35 were randomized to receive autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR group). Outcomes, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score, instrumented AP laxity and muscle strength were assessed at 2 years post-operatively. Both patients and assessors were blinded as to surgical assignment until after the 2-year assessment.Results:Ninety-six percent of the subjects returned for follow-up at 2 years. The median age of the subjects in both groups at enrollment was 17 years and the median pre-operative Marx score in both groups was 16 points. Non-inferiority criteria were met for both the IKDC subjective score and AP laxity. The BEAR group had significantly better recovery of hamstring strength than the ACLR group (p<0.001). The number of subjects who were reinjured and required a second ACL surgery was not statistically different between the two groups. Subjects who converted from BEAR to ACLR in the study period had outcomes at the 2-year point that were similar to those for subjects who had only a single ipsiateral ACL procedure (BEAR or ACLR).Conclusion:Bridge-enhanced ACL repair using a specific protein-based implant led to non-inferior outcomes to that of ACL reconstruction for patient reported and instrumented knee laxity measures at 2 years after surgery in a young and active cohort of patients with acute mid-substance ACL tears.