Suture Anchor Technique Research Articles

Suture anchor and transtibial pullout refixation of the posterior medial meniscus root tears restore tibiofemoral contact pressure and area to intact meniscus levels.

To compare the load distributed to the medial tibial articular cartilage after refixation of posterior medial meniscus root tears between the suture anchor and transtibial pullout techniques in posterior medial meniscus root tears. Twelve Thiel's embalmed human cadaveric knees are used and divided into three groups (four knees in each group): (1) intact meniscus (IM), (2) fixation with suture anchor technique (SA) and (3) fixation with transtibial pullout technique (TP). Each group applies an axial compression load up to 1500 N by Instron E 10000 at two knee flexion angles (0° and 60°). A Tekscan 4000 pressure sensor is used to record the contact pressure and the contact area for each testing condition. The contact pressure and the contact area between the three conditions are not significantly different at 0° and 60° knee flexion angles. The peak contact pressure and contact area are 3734.8 ± 2642.2 kPa, 288.2 ± 115.0 mm2, 4510 ± 2930.5 kPa, 204.4 ± 36.8 mm2 and 5328.8 ± 2607.7 kPa, 219.2 ± 84.7 mm2 in IM, SA and TP, respectively. Both suture anchor and transtibial pullout refixation of PMMRT can restore contact pressure and contact area similar to the intact meniscus. This finding suggests that either technique can be reliably used in clinical practice to preserve joint function and potentially reduce the risk of osteoarthritis progression following posterior medial meniscus root tear repairs. Level III.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Isolated Double-Bundle Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A 5-Year Analysis.

There are few studies that have examined clinical and radiological outcomes at 5 years after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. To date, midterm outcomes after isolated double-bundle (DB) MPFL reconstruction are not well known. Isolated DB MPFL reconstruction using a patellar suture anchor technique would lead to improved functional scores and radiological findings, and these improvements would remain stable over the 5-year postoperative period. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Isolated MPFL reconstruction was performed in patients with recurrent patellar instability between March 2013 and February 2017. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed via an interview using the Kujala, Lysholm, and Tegner scores preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. Radiographs were taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 24 and 60 months after surgery. Radiographic assessments included measuring the modified Insall-Salvati ratio, congruence angle, and lateral patellofemoral angle. A total of 31 patients (31 knees) underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction; 4 patients did not complete 5-year follow-up, and thus, 27 patients (27 knees) were enrolled in the study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 22.0 ± 6.4 years (range, 14-32 years). All clinical and functional scores significantly improved in the first 2 years (P < .001), with the mean Kujala, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improving from 52.7 to 90.7, 49.6 to 92.7, and 2.9 to 5.1, respectively. There was no significant difference in scores between 2- and 5-year follow-up. All radiographic parameters significantly improved between preoperatively and immediately postoperatively (P < .001), with mean values for the modified Insall-Salvati ratio, congruence angle, and lateral patellofemoral angle improving from 1.7° to 1.6°, 5.7° to -6.6°, and 3.0° to 5.9°, respectively. No significant differences were observed in radiographic measurements between the postoperative time points. No patients experienced a patellar redislocation or fracture. The prospective analysis of isolated DB MPFL reconstruction at 5-year follow-up showed that clinical and radiological outcomes significantly improved postoperatively and were maintained to 5 years. These midterm results suggest that isolated DB MPFL reconstruction is an effective treatment option for patients with patellar instability.

An Underrated Performer in Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: Single-row Suture Anchor Technique

Abstract Background: Single-row suture anchor technique is a well-established, economical, and relatively easier method of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that has been recently tripped over by double-row technique which is proven to be biomechanically superior. However, this advantage is not reflected in the functional outcome scores which are reported to be identical with both single- and double-row techniques. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed on 67 patients with degenerative rotator cuff tear, diagnosis was confirmed on radiological magnetic resonance imaging, treated surgically by single-row suture anchor method, and evaluated for functional outcome at minimum 1-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were calculated at initial evaluation and the end of 1-year follow-up. Results: Eighty-six percentage of the patients showed a clinically significant improvement in VAS and ASES scores. Conclusion: Consistent acceptable success rates in terms of outcome functional scores, including patient reported outcomes, depict single-row suture anchor technique as a reliable option for the management of degenerative rotator cuff tears 3 cm or less.

Comparing the Efficacy of the Knotless Suture Anchor Technique in Bony and Soft Tissue Bankart Lesions: A Cohort Study on Shoulder Instability Patients

Comparing the Efficacy of the Knotless Suture Anchor Technique in Bony and Soft Tissue Bankart Lesions: A Cohort Study on Shoulder Instability Patients

Arthroscopic repair is an effective treatment for dynamic medial ankle instability secondary to posttraumatic and partial injury of the deltoid ligament deep fascicle.

When the intermediate or collicular fascicle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is injured, the diagnosis of posttraumatic medial ankle instability (MAI) is supported. The aim of this study was to describe an arthroscopic all-inside MCL repair after posttraumatic MAI secondary to an isolated injury of the MCL deep fascicle with a knotless suture anchor technique. Seven patients (seven men, median age: 23 [19-28] years) with posttraumatic MAI were treated by arthroscopic means after failing nonoperative management. The median follow-up was 34 (13-75) months. The MCL was repaired with an arthroscopic all-inside technique. A tear affecting the deep and intermediate or collicular fascicle of the MCL was observed in all cases. In addition, five patients were diagnosed with an isolated fibular anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) detachment, and in two patients, both the ATFL and calcaneofibular ligament were involved. All patients reported subjective improvement after the arthroscopic ligament repair. The median American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 68 (range: 64-70) preoperatively to 100 (range: 90-100) at final follow-up. Posttraumatic MAI can be successfully treated by an arthroscopic all-inside repair of the MCL. The presence of an MCL tear affecting the tibiotalar ligament fibres attached to the area of the anterior colliculus should be considered a sign of posttraumatic MAI. This partial deltoid injury at the level of the intermediate or collicular fascicle will conduct to a dynamic MAI. Level IV.

Fixation technique of biodegradable magnesium alloy suture anchor in the rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in a goat model: a technical note

BackgroundShoulder disorders, particularly rotator cuff tears, are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions related to aging. Although the widely used suture anchor technique provides strong mechanical support to the tendon, it is associated with a risk of postoperative tendon retearing. The conventionally used titanium alloys can affect the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging. Degradable magnesium alloys possess excellent biocompatibility, similar mechanical property to the bone, and stimulating bone formation ability from Mg2+. The purpose of this experiment was to develop innovative magnesium-based suture anchors to enhance rotator cuff repair by improving fixation materials, and to evaluate their feasibility in a goat model.MethodsWe developed fluoridized ZK60 suture anchors as the implantation material for two goats, who underwent rotator cuff repair surgery on both shoulders. Computed tomography (CT) and histological analysis were performed at 12 weeks postoperatively, and the results were compared between the magnesium and titanium alloy groups. Additionally, a hematological examination was conducted, which included assessments of red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets, coagulation function, liver function, kidney function, and magnesium ion concentration.ResultsThe 12-week postoperative CT images showed intact MgF2 ZK60 suture anchors, effectively reconnecting the infraspinatus tendon to the humeral head. The anchors became less visible on CT scans, indicating absorption by surrounding tissues. New bone formation in the MgF2 group surpassed that in the Ti group, demonstrating superior osseointegration. The similarity between cortical bone and magnesium reduced stress-shielding and promoted bone regeneration. Histological analysis revealed successful tendon healing with MgF2 anchors, while the Ti group showed discontinuous interfaces and reduced collagen secretion. Hematological examination showed stable liver, renal function, and magnesium ion levels.ConclusionsThe findings indicate that MgF2-coated suture anchors are feasible for rotator cuff repair and potentially other orthopedic applications. We hope that magnesium alloy anchors can become the solution for rotator cuff tendon repair surgery.

Optimizing pectoralis major tendon repair: a modified knotless suture anchor technique using high-strength suture and tape

BackgroundRupture of the pectoralis major tendon is infrequent but has shown an increased incidence in athletes, particularly weightlifters during bench presses. Various techniques for repair exist, yet no established gold standard has been defined. MethodsWe present a modified surgical technique utilizing knotless suture anchors for pectoralis major tendon repair. The technique involves bringing the tendon end superiorly and inferiorly to the decorticated bone surface, ensuring broader tendon-to-bone contact. Knotless anchors with a unique suture locking mechanism facilitate tension adjustment. Additionally, the repair's strength is reinforced by employing both surgical tape and high-strength suture. ResultsThe utilization of both surgical tape and high-strength suture in conjunction with knotless suture anchors provides a secure and stable construct. This approach minimizes the risk of failure, reduces the potential for neurovascular injury associated with bicortical drilling, preserves imaging quality due to the absence of metal artifacts, and helps avoid the risk of fracture associated with traditional methods. However, surgeons should be aware of a potential disadvantage of increased surgical costs compared to traditional techniques. ConclusionsOur modified technique offers multiple advantages, including increased tendon-to-bone contact, enhanced stability, reduced neurovascular risks, and avoidance of potential fractures. This makes it a valuable option for successful pectoralis major tendon repairs. Surgeons should consider its benefits and weigh them against the associated costs for optimal patient care.

Suture Anchor Technique for Bridge Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in the athletic population. ACL repair with bridge enhancement is an emerging technology with promising clinical outcomes in patients with a proximal to midsubstance ACL tears. Currently, there are a variety of fixation methods described for isolated ACL repair, including suspensory and anchor techniques. This Technical Note describes a bridge enhanced ACL restoration procedure technique, using suture anchors for the femoral fixation. Advantages of this technique include more rigid fixation and avoiding need for accessory over-the-top incision. Additionally, the surgical workflow is more similar to an ACL reconstruction with intra-articular screw fixation, which may be more readily adopted by some surgeons.

Similar Outcomes Are Found Between Quadriceps Tendon Repair With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and biomechanical performance of transosseous tunnels compared with suture anchors for quadriceps tendon repair. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was performed in April 2021 in the following databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed (1980-2021), MEDLINE (1980-2021), Embase (1980-2021), and CINAHL (1980-2021). Level I-IV studies were included if they provided outcome data for surgical repair of the quadriceps tendon using transosseous tunnels or suture anchors with minimum 1-year follow-up. Biomechanical studies comparing transosseous tunnels and suture anchors were separately analyzed. The systematic search yielded 1,837 citations, 23 of which met inclusion criteria (18 clinical, 5 biomechanical). In total, 13 studies reported results for transosseous repair and 7 studies reported results for repair with suture anchors. There were results for 508 patients from clinical studies. The average postoperative Lysholm score ranged from 88 to 92 for suture anchor repairs and 72.8 to 94 for transosseous repairs with range of motion ranging from 117° to 138° and 116° to 135°, respectively. Synthesis of the biomechanical data revealed the mean difference in load to failure was not significant between constructs (137.21; 95% confidence interval -10.14 to 284.57 N; P= .068). Transosseous and suture anchor techniques for quadriceps tendon repair result in similar biomechanical and postoperative outcomes. No difference between techniques in regard to ultimate load to failure among comparative biomechanical studies were observed. Level IV, systematic review level III-IV studies.

BIOMECHANICAL STUDY COMPARING THE DOUBLE-LASSO LOOP TECHNIQUE TO INTERFERENCE SCREW FIXATION FOR BICEPS TENODESIS IN AN OVINE MODEL

This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of the “Double Lasso-Loop” suture anchor (DLSA) technique with the commonly performed interference screw (IS) technique in an ex vivo ovine model.Fourteen fresh sheep shoulder specimens were used in this study. Dissection was performed leaving only the biceps muscle attached to the humerus and proximal radius before sharply incised to simulate long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tear. Repair of the LHBT tear was performed on all specimens using either DSLA or IS technique. Cyclical loading of 500 cycles followed by load to failure was performed on all specimens. Tendon displacement due to the cyclical loading at every 100 cycles as well as the maximum load at failure were recorded and analysed. Stiffness was also calculated from the load displacement graph during load to failure testing.No statistically significant difference in tendon displacement was observed from 200 to 500 cycles. Statistically significant higher stiffness was observed in IS when compared with DSLA (P = .005). Similarly, IS demonstrated significantly higher ultimate failure load as compared with DSLA (P = .001). Modes of failure observed for DSLA was mostly due to suture failure (7/8) and anchor pull-out (1/8) while IS resulted in mostly LHBT (4/6) or biceps (2/6) tears. DSLA failure load were compared with previous studies and similar results were noted.After cyclical loading, tendon displacement in DLSA technique was not significantly different from IS technique. Despite the higher failure loads associated with IS techniques in the present study, absolute peak load characteristics of DLSA were similar to previous studies. Hence, DLSA technique can be considered as a suitable alternative to IS fixation for biceps tenodesis.

A suture anchor-based repair technique for type IV jersey finger injuries: a biomechanical investigation

The aim of this biomechanical investigation was to evaluate a repair technique for type IV FDP tendon avulsions using a suture anchor, addressing the bony and the tendinous aspect of this injury simultaneously. In 45 distal phalanges from human anatomical specimens the injury was simulated and repairs were performed with a suture anchor using an innovative technique, interosseous sutures and a combination of screws and an interosseous suture. Repetitive loading for 500 cycles simulated postoperative mobilization. Repairs were loaded to failure thereafter. Elongation of the tendon-suture complex, gap formation at the bone-bone contact line and at the bone-tendon insertion line, load at first noteworthy displacement (2 mm), load at failure and the mechanism of failure were assessed. The suture anchor technique was superior biomechanically considering load at failure (mean: 72.8 N), bony gap formation (mean: 0.1 mm) as well as tendinous gap formation (mean: 0.7 mm), implying a preferable stability of the repair. Overall, this study demonstrates good ex vivo mechanical stability for a proposed suture anchor repair technique for type IV FDP tendon avulsion injuries, which might enable early postoperative mobilization in patients. The technique's subcutaneous implant placement and low implant load are expected to reduce potential complications observed in other commonly used repair techniques. This approach warrants further evaluation in vivo.

Suture-Staple Fixation of Os Acetabuli: Description of a Novel Fixation Technique Using Linked Knotless Suture Anchors

Background: An os acetabuli is a bone fragment of the acetabular rim. Several stabilization techniques have been described in the literature including the use of canulated headless compression screws, sutures placed over screws, and knotted suture anchors; however, the use of screws near the joint could either lead to irritation or increased joint surface wear if placed improperly. Indications: Fixation of an os acetabuli is indicated when removal of the os would result in under-coverage of the femoral head which would in turn lead to a rapid onset of arthritis. Technique Description: This novel technique for os acetabuli fixation uses knotless suture anchors to create a “suture-staple” construct. Following the debridement of fibrous tissue and labral repair, reduction of the acetabular os is accomplished and confirmed on intraoperative fluoroscopy. Knottless FiberTak™ Suture Anchors are placed in the anterior and the posterior aspects of the os, and the anchor suture of one anchor is passed through the pass suture of the second anchor to create a “suture-staple” configuration. Results: Maintenance of reduction and pain-free motion of the hip was confirmed at 3-month clinic follow-up. The x-rays obtained at this time revealed no evidence of arthritis and appropriate coverage of the hip joint. Discussion/Conclusion: Outcomes of other methods of os fixation are largely lacking; however, outcomes using a knotted suture anchor technique in 3 patients with 1-year follow-up seem to indicate fully healed os fragments in all patients with improvement in patient-reported outcomes scores. Longer-term follow-up will be needed to ensure this similar technique produces similar outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

A randomized controlled trial to compare clinical and cost-effectiveness of suture fixation versus tension band wiring for simple olecranon fracture fixation in adults: The Simple Olecranon Fracture Fixation Trial (SOFFT) protocol.

Olecranon fractures are usually caused by falling directly on to the olecranon or following a fall on to an outstretched arm. Displaced fractures of the olecranon with a stable ulnohumeral joint are commonly managed by open reduction and internal fixation. The current predominant method of management of simple displaced fractures with ulnohumeral stability (Mayo grade IIA) in the UK and internationally is a low-cost technique using tension band wiring. Suture or suture anchor techniques have been described with the aim of reducing the hardware related complications and reoperation. An all-suture technique has been developed to fix the fracture using strong synthetic sutures alone. The aim of this trial is to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tension suture repair versus traditional tension band wiring for the surgical fixation of Mayo grade IIA fractures of the olecranon. SOFFT is a multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be assigned 1:1 to receive either tension suture fixation or tension band wiring. 280 adult participants will be recruited. The primary outcome will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at four months post-randomization. Secondary outcome measures include DASH (at 12, 18, and 24 months), pain, Net Promotor Score (patient satisfaction), EuroQol five-dimension five-level score (EQ-5D-5L), radiological union, complications, elbow range of motion, and re-operations related to the injury or to remove metalwork. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments. There is currently no high-quality evidence comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of the tension suture repair to the traditional tension band wiring currently offered for the internal fixation of displaced fractures of the olecranon. The Simple Olecranon Fracture Fixation Trial (SOFFT) is a randomized controlled trial with sufficient power and design rigour to provide this evidence for the subtype of Mayo grade IIA fractures.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2023;4(1):27-37.

Retracted: Clinical Effect of Suture Anchor and Double-Pulley Technique in the Treatment of Inferior Patellar Fracture.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/4964195.].

Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair May Result in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes but Similar Failure Rates Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique

The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient-reported outcomes between transosseus (TO) suture and suture anchor (SA) quadriceps tendon repairs. Following institutional review board approval, patients who underwent primary repair for quadriceps tendon rupture with TO or SA techniques between January 2009 and August 2018 were identified from an institutional database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted for satisfaction (1-10 scale), current function (0-100 scale), failure (retear), and revision surgeries; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) were also collected to achieve a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Sixty-four patients (34 SA, 30 TO) were available by phone or e-mail at a mean of 4.81 ± 2.60 years postoperatively. There were 10 failures, for an overall failure rate of 15.6%. Failure incidence did not significantly differ between treatment groups (P= .83). Twenty-seven patients (47% of nonfailed patients) had completed patient-reported outcomes. The SA group reported higher subjective function (SA: 90 [85-100] vs TO: 85 [60-93], 95% CI of difference: -19.9 to -2.1× 10-5, P= .042), final IKDC (79.6 [50.0-93.6] vs 62.1 [44.3-65.5], 95% CI of difference: -33.0 to -0.48, P= .048), KOOS Pain (97.2 [84.7-97.2] vs 73.6 [50.7-88.2], 95% CI of difference: -36.1 to -3.6× 10-5, P= .037), Quality of Life (81.3 [56.3-93.8] vs 50.0 [23.4-56.3], 95% CI of difference: -50.0 to-6.2, P= .026), and Sport (75.0 [52.5-90.0] vs 47.5 [31.3-67.5], 95% CI of the difference: -45.0 to -4.1× 10-5, P=.048). There is no significant difference in failure rate between transosseus and suture anchor repairs for quadriceps tendon ruptures (P= .83). Most failures occur secondary to a traumatic reinjury within the first year postoperatively. Despite the lack of difference in failure rates, at final follow-up, patients who undergo suture anchor repair may report significantly greater subjective function and final IKDC, KOOS Pain, Quality of Life, and Sport scores. III, retrospective cohort study.

Tension band wiring versus suture anchor technique in patellar inferior pole fracture: Novel double row suture anchor technique.

Patellar inferior pole fractures are challenging to obtain sufficient fixation. The purpose of this retrospective, case-controlled study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between tension band wiring (TBW) and our novel double-row suture anchor (SA) technique in patellar inferior pole fractures. This retrospective study included patients who underwent TBW or SA fixation for patellar inferior pole fractures from 2015 to 2019. A total of 63 patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure: the TBW group (n=35) and the SA fixation group (n=28). The visual analog scale score, range of motion of the knee, Lysholm score, Kujala patellofemoral score, and patient satisfaction score were evaluated for clinical and functional outcomes. Radiological outcomes included the time to radiological union, loss of reduction, and the Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed in both groups with no significant differences. Bone union was achieved in all patients, and there was no significant difference in the time to radiological union and the IS ratio between the two groups. All patients in the TBW group underwent additional surgeries for implant removal. However, none of the patients in the SA group underwent implant removal or experienced skin irritation. Our novel double-row SA technique could provide comparable fixation strength and good clinical outcomes, with fewer complications in patellar inferior pole fractures. This novel SA technique is a satisfactory alternative treatment for patellar inferior pole fractures.

Outcome Following Acute Suture Anchor Repair of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Thumb

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following acute repair of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint (thumb UCL) using a suture anchor technique. Methods: From 2011 to 2019, we retrospectively identified 40 adult patients from a single centre who had undergone an acute thumb UCL repair (≤6 weeks post-injury). The mean age of the study cohort was 37 years (range 16-70) and 68% (n = 27/40) were male. The short-term outcomes included postoperative complications and failure of repair. The long-term outcomes were QuickDASH, the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), return to sport and work and satisfaction with outcome. Results: The outcomes survey was completed at a mean of 4.3 years (range 1.0-9.2) for 33 patients (83%). Postoperative complications included self-limiting sensory disturbance (7.5%, n = 3/40), superficial infection (requiring oral antibiotics; 5%, n = 2/40) and wound dehiscence (requiring surgical debridement and re-closure; 2.5%, n = 1/40). No failures of repair were reported. The mean QuickDASH was 3.7 (range 0-27.3), EQ-5D 0.821 (range -0.041 to 1) and EQ-VAS 84 (range 60-100). Of the 32 employed patients, all returned to work at a median of 0.5 weeks (range 0-416) and the mean QuickDASH Work Module was 4.1 (range 0-50). Of the 24 patients playing sport prior to injury, 96% (n = 23/24) returned at a median of 16 weeks (range 5-52) and the mean QuickDASH Sport Module was 4.6 (range 0-25). All the patients were satisfied with their outcome (mean satisfaction score 9.8/10 [8-10O]). Conclusions: Thumb UCL repair using a suture anchor technique is safe and effective up to 6 weeks post injury. Pain and stiffness may persist in the longer term, but most patients report excellent upper limb function and health-related quality of life. The majority return to work and sport and are highly satisfied with their outcome. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

A Transosseous Suture as an Alternative to Suture Anchor on Anterior-Avulsion Greater Tuberosity Fragment Fixation in Neer Three-Part Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Biomechanical Study.

Greater tuberosity (GT) fragments were communicated, and additional techniques to increase the GT fragment stability after the locking plate fixation was necessary. This study aimed to analyze the reinforcement effects on the anterior-avulsion GT fragment in Neer three-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) using transosseous suture and suture anchor techniques. Eighteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulder specimens were used in the study. Standardized fracture of the GT and surgical neck was created in 18 human cadaveric proximal humerus. The GT fragments were reinforced with transosseous suture (TS), suture anchor (SA), and suture in addition to the PHILOS plate fixation. The fixed humerus was tested by applying static loading to the supraspinatus tendon. Load forces and fragment displacement were evaluated by a biomechanical testing machine, and the load to 3- and 5-mm displacements, load to failure, and mode of failure were recorded for all specimens. Nonparametric variables were examined by the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to analyze the mean loads to create 3- and 5-mm displacements as well as the failure load. The age, female proportion, and bone mineral density showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups. The mean loading force to create 3-mm and 5-mm displacement in the TS group (254.9 ± 77.4, 309.6 ± 152.7) were significantly higher than those in the suture group (136.1 ± 16.7, 193.4 ± 14.5) (P=0.024, P=0.005). For the SA group, the force to create 3- and 5-mm displacement (204.3 ± 60.9, 307.8 ± 73.5) were comparable to those in the TS group (P = 0.236, P=0.983). Moreover, the loading force to failure in the TS group (508.6 ± 217.7) and SA group (406.6 ± 114.9) was significantly higher than that in the suture group (265.9 ± 52.1) (P=0.021, P=0.024). In the TS group, three failed due to tendon-bone junction rupture; bone tunnel broken occurred in two specimens; suture rupture could also be seen in one specimen. All specimens in the suture group failed because of suture rupture. In the SA group, three specimens failed due to suture rupture; two failed secondary to tendon-bone junction rupture; and one failed because of shaft fracture. Transosseous suture is a new type of reinforcement for GT fragment in Neer-three part PHFs. The transosseous suture was superior to the suture only in the reinforcement of the anterior-avulsion GT fragment of Neer three-part PHFs, and it had comparable biomechanical strength to the suture anchor.

Repair of Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Tears

Tears of the quadriceps or patellar tendon usually occur after a sudden eabccentric contraction and are diagnosed by a palpable gap at the injury site combined with an inability to perform a straight leg raise. Bilateral knee radiographs may demonstrate patella alta with patellar tendon tears and patella baja with quadriceps tendon tears compared with the uninjured knee. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful when there is uncertainty in the diagnosis. Surgical treatment is indicated for complete tears and some high-grade, partial tears. Nonabsorbable high-strength sutures or suture tape are placed in running locking fashion along the injured tendon and secured to the patella with bone tunnels (i.e., transosseous) or suture anchors. The transosseous technique requires exposure of the length of the patella to drill 3 bone tunnels to shuttle the sutures and tie over either pole of the patella. The suture anchor technique allows for a smaller incision and less soft-tissue dissection and may use a knotted or knotless technique. Biomechanical testing with load to failure is not statistically different between the transosseous and anchor techniques, although anchors have been shown to have less gap formation at the repair site. Repair augmentation with a graft may be beneficial in mid-substance injuries, chronic tears, and in cases of compromised tissue quality. Rehabilitation usually can be initiated immediately with protected weight-bearing in an orthosis, safe-zone knee passive range of motion, and avoidance of active extension. After a period of 6 weeks, rehabilitation can progress with full range of motion and a concentric strengthening program.

Arthroscopic Anchorless Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Produces Equivalent Clinical Outcomes and Imaging Results as a Standard Suture Bridge Technique with Anchors

To compare the clinical and imaging outcome of arthroscopic transosseous (TO)-equivalent rotator cuff repair (RCR) with anchors with arthroscopic anchorless TO RCR at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The study population included patients who underwent RCR using either an anchorless TO technique with a TO suture passing device (group A) and those who were matched for tear size and underwent RCR using suture anchors for repair (group B). The inclusion criterion was an easily reducible rotator cuff tear with a sagittal extension of 2 to 4 cm. After a minimum of 2 years, clinical outcome scores and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained. Tendon quality and footprint integration were evaluated using the Sugaya classification. Seventy patients were included. A total of 45 were in group A and 25 were in group B. Group A had 2 bone tunnels and 4 sutures using an X-box configuration, and group B had a suture bridge construct of 4 anchors. Group A and B had identical anteroposterior tear size and were comparable for age. The Constant score improved from 50 ± 17.4 to 88 ± 8.6 in group A versus 48 ± 14.5 to 87 ± 7.2 in B. The SubjectiveShoulder Value rose from 47 ± 19.1 to 95 ± 7.4 in group A vs from 47 ± 19.4 to 95 ± 7.6 in B. Neither the preoperative (P ≥ .502) nor postoperative scores (P ≥ .29) showed a significant difference. Magnetic resonance imaging showed 2 small retears in group A and one in B, resulting in an identical 4% retear rate. The mean Sugaya type was 2.02 versus 2.24 (P= .206) for groups A versus B. Anchorless TO RCR is a valid alternative to suture anchor techniques. Clinical outcome data showed comparable results for both techniques after a follow-up of 2 years. The healing results as observed on magnetic resonance imaging were also equivalent for both groups. Level III, retrospective comparative study.