Suspicious Digital Rectal Examination Findings Research Articles

The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Early Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The role of digital rectal examination (DRE) in the early detection of significant prostate cancer (PCa) is being questioned in the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, some men with suspected PCa may still be identified solely through DRE, even with low serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Additionally, most predictive models designed to improve significant PCa diagnostic pathways incorporate DRE findings. We assessed the role of DRE among 5005 men with serum PSA levels > 3.0 ng/mL and/or suspicious DRE findings, who underwent pre-biopsy MRI and targeted and/or systematic biopsies, as part of the significant PCa opportunistic screening program in Catalonia (Spain) between 2016 and 2023. Significant PCa, defined as grade group > 2, was detected in 2097 men (41.9%). Suspicion of PCa was based solely on DRE in 206 cases (4.1%) with significant PCa detected in 50 of them (2.4%). Two pathways using the Barcelona predictive models, before and after MRI, with and without DRE findings showed specificities of 52.8 and 38.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), after fixing sensitivity at 90%. Prostate biopsy was avoided in 35.1 and 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), while its efficacy increased from 52.8 to 58%. We conclude that DRE improved the effectiveness of an opportunistic significant PCa-screening program.

Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound vs. Active Surveillance for ISUP Grade 1 Prostate Cancer: Medium-Term Results of a Matched-Pair Comparison.

Only 1 randomized controlled trial has compared focal therapy and active surveillance (AS) for the low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). We investigated whether focal HIFU (fHIFU) yields oncologic advantages over AS for low-risk PCa. We included 2 non-randomized prospective series of 132 (fHIFU) and 421 (AS) consecutive patients diagnosed with ISUP 1 PCa between 2008 and 2018. A matched pair analysis was performed to decrease potential bias. Study main outcomes were freedom from radical treatment (RT) or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), treatment-free survival (TFS), time to metastasis, and overall survival (OS). Median fHIFU follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range, 29-84 months). Among matched variables, no major differences were recorded except for AS having more suspicious digital rectal examination findings (P = .0074) and recent enrollment year (P = .0005). Five-year intervention-free survival from RT or ADT was higher for the fHIFU cohort (67.4% vs. 53.8%; P = .0158). Time to treatment was approximately 10 months shorter for AS than for fHIFU (time to RT, P = .0363; time to RT or ADT, P = .0156; time to any treatment, P = .0319). No differences were found in any-TFS (fHIFU, 61.4% vs. AS, 53.8%; P = .2635), OS (fHIFU, 97% vs. AS, 97%; P = .9237), or metastasis (n=0 in fHIFU and n = 2 in AS; P = .4981). Major complications (≥ Clavien 3) were rare (n = 4), although 36.4% of men experienced complications. No relevant changes were noted in continence (P = .3949). At a 4-year median follow-up, fHIFU for mainly low-risk PCa (ISUP grade 1) is safe, may decrease the need for radical treatment or ADT and may allow longer time to treatment compared to AS. Nonetheless, no advantages are seen in PCa progression and/or death (OS).

Correlation of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen levels for detection of prostate cancer: Retrospective analysis results from a tertiary care urology center.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the detection rate of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels followed by standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. After screening of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using DRE and serum PSA level, we enrolled patients for TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Indications included PSA level ≥4 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE findings. A retrospective analysis was done to find out the correlation between suspicious rectal examination and various serum PSA levels in detection of cancer prostate. A total of 847 patients were screened for cancer prostate during our study period (May 2012-February 2020). Among them, 823 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were analyzed. Prostate cancer was detected in 330 cases (40.09%). Mean age of patient (years) with and without prostate cancer was 66.25 ± 9.45 and 64.3 ± 8.96 years, respectively. Median value of serum PSA in patients positive for cancer was 33 ± 260 ng/ml compared to patients without cancer, who had a median value of 9 ± 64 ng/ml (P-value of <0.0001). The detection rate of cancer based on suspicious DRE findings irrespective of PSA was 52.18% (251/481), compared to 45.46% (311/684) using a PSA cut-off of ≥4.0 ng/ml alone. Among 330 patients with positive biopsy, 19 (5.75%) had a PSA level <4 ng/ml and they were identified based on suspicious DRE alone. Suspicious DRE was significantly associated with detection of prostate cancer across all PSA levels. Patients with PSA <4 can harbor prostate malignancy and such cases can be detected by use of DRE in screening of all patients with LUTS.

Clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes in negative multiparametric MRI patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Efforts are ongoing to try and find ways to reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies without missing clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa). The utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) shows promise to be used as triage test for systematic prostate biopsy. Our aim is to Study clinical parameters and oncological outcomes in men with negative mpMRI (nMRI; PI-RADS v2 scores of ≤ 2) who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to evaluate nMRI's practicality as a biopsy triage test. Retrospective analysis of 331 men with nMRI who underwent RARP between 2014 and 2020 compared with men with positive mpMRI (pMRI; PI-RADS v2 scores ≥ 3, N = 1770). csPCa was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 and biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA > 0.2 ng/ml on two occasions. Biopsies were graded with the International Society of Urologic Pathology [ISUP] grade. Descriptive statistics for nMRI and pMRI were performed. Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables and χ 2 for categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Univariable analysis shows statistically significant difference (p < .05) between median age (nMRI-61 years vs. pMRI 63 years), race (higher incidence of nMRI in African American men), use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (higher rate in nMRI). While incidence rates of family history of PCa, suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, median PSA levels and 4Kscore, were lower in nMRI versus pMRI. Rates of positive surgical margins and BCR were comparable in nMRI versus pMRI. Biopsy ISUP Grades I and II upgraded by 51% and 12%, respectively in final pathology. African American race and no history of the prior negative biopsy were significant predictors for upgrading. Men with nMRI pose diagnostic challenges as they tend to be younger patients with lower rates of suspicious DRE findings and lower 4K scores, yet comparable oncological outcomes in csPCa rates, positive surgical margins, and BCR rates.

Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound.

We aimed to compare systematic biopsies (SBs) of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGpB) with those performed under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance in the clinical setting. Data on all 161 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy at our institution between November 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were referred to biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion score of ≥3 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We included patients with PSA levels ≤20 ng/ml and those with 8-12 core biopsies. Histology results of SBs performed by in-bore MRGpB were compared to TRUS SBs. Chi-squared, Fischer's exact, and multivariate Pearson regression tests were used for statistical analysis (SPSS, IBM Corporation). In total, 128 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61.5-72), mean prostate size 55±29 cc, and mean PSA and PSA density levels 7.6±3.5 ng/ml and 0.18±0.13 ng/ml/cc, respectively. Thirty-five patients (27.3%) had suspicious DRE findings. Both biopsy groups were similar for these parameters. Thirty-eight (62.3%) MRGpB patients had a previous biopsy vs. five (7.1%) TRUS-SB patients (p<0.0001). The number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant and non-significant disease was similar for both groups. High-risk disease was more prevalent in the TRUS-SB group (22.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.01). Our data suggest that in-bore MRGpB is no better than TRUS for guiding SBs for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Should anaesthesia method for prostate biopsy be the same for every patient? A randomised prospective study to determine the risk factors for pain

Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors for pain occurring during prostate biopsy. Methods: This study included 123 patients were applied with prostate needle biopsy under transrectal ultrasonography. The patients were randomly separated into 3 groups of 41 individuals. For periprostatic nerve blockage, 10 cc 2% lidocaine was applied to Group 1, 10 cc 0.25% levobupivacaine to Group 2, and 10 cc 0.25% bupivacaine to Group 3. A 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient pain. The pain of the patients was evaluated in 4 stages. VAS 1: Pain score during the injection of the anaesthetic agent; VAS 2: Pain score during the biopsy when half the procedure was completed; VAS 3: Pain score following removal of the rectal probe immediately after the biopsy; and VAS 4: Pain score at 1 hour after the biopsy. Results: There were significant negative correlations between VAS 3 pain scores and age in group 1, group 3 and for entire cohort (p = 0.013, p = 0.031 and p = 0.033, respectively). In group 1 both total and free PSA showed significant negative correlations with VAS 3 pain scores (p = 0.020 and p = 0.010, respectively). In group 2 VAS 4 pain scores of the patients with suspicious digital examination findings were found to be significantly higher than those of the patients with benign digital examination findings (p = 0.025). Conclusions: Of all patients to be applied with prostate biopsy, those of a younger age, with a lower PSA level, with suspicious digital rectal examination findings constitute a relatively higher risk group in respect of pain.

A urine exosomal circRNA classifier for detection of high-grade prostate cancer at initial biopsy: A multicenter, retrospective study.

5522 Background: The low specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically indolent prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to identify a urine exosomal circular RNA (circRNA) classifier that could detect high-grade (Gleason score [GS]7 or greater) PCa. Methods: We did a three-stage study that enrolled eligible participants, including PCa-free men, 45 years or older, scheduled for an initial prostate biopsy due to suspicious digital rectal examination findings and/or PSA levels (limit range, 2.0-20.0 ng/mL), from four hospitals in China. We used RNA sequencing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction to identify 18 candidate urine exosomal circRNAs that were increased in 11 patients with high-grade PCa compared with 11 case-matched patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Using a training cohort of eligible participants, we built a urine exosomal circRNA classifier (Ccirc) to detect high-grade PCa. We then evaluated the classifier in discrimination of GS7 or greater from GS6 and benign disease on initial biopsy in two independent cohorts. We used the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate diagnostic performance, and compared Ccirc with standard of care (SOC) (ie, PSA level, age, race, and family history). Results: Between June 1, 2016, and July 31, 2019, we recruited 356 participants to the training cohort, and 442 and 325 participants to the two independent validation cohorts. We identified a Ccirc containing five differentially expressed circRNAs (circ_0049335, circ_0056536, circ_0004028, circ_0008475, and circ_0126027) that could detect high-grade PCa. Ccirc showed higher accuracy than SOC to distinguish individuals with high-grade PCa from controls in both the training cohort and the validation cohorts. (AUC 0.831 [95% CI 0.765-0.883] vs 0.724 [0.705-0.852], P = 0.032 in the training cohort; 0.823 [0.762-0.871] vs 0.706 [0.649-0.762], P = 0.007 in validation cohort 1; and 0.878 [0.802-0.943] vs 0.785 [0.701-0.890], P = 0.021 for validation cohort 2). In all three cohorts, Ccirc had higher sensitivity (range 71.6-87.2%) and specificity (82.3-90.7%) than did SOC (sensitivity, 42.3-68.2%; specificity, 40.1-62.3%) to detect high-grade PCa. Using a predefined cut point, 202 of 767 (26.3%) biopsies would have been avoided, missing only 6% of patients with dominant pattern 4 high-risk GS 7 disease. Conclusions: Ccirc is a potential biomarker for high-grade PCa among suspicious men.

Prostate cancer screening among elderly men in Brazil: should we diagnose or not?

ABSTRACTPurpose:Prostate cancer screening in the elderly is controversial. The Brazilian government and the National Cancer Institute (INCA) do not recommend systematic screening. Our purpose was to assess prevalence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer in men aged 70 years and above, on the first Latin American database to date.Materials and Methods:Cross-sectional study (n=17,571) from 231 municipalities, visited by Mobile Cancer Prevention Units of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based opportunistic screening program, between 2004 and 2007. The criteria for biopsy were: PSA>4.0ng/ml, or PSA 2.5-4.0ng/ml with free/total PSA ratio ≤15%, or suspicious digital rectal examination findings. The screened men were stratified in two age groups (45-69 years, and ≥70 years). These groups were compared regarding prostate cancer prevalence and aggressiveness criteria (PSA, Gleason score from biopsy and TNM staging).Results:The prevalence of prostate cancer found was 3.7%. When compared to men aged 45-69 years, individuals aged 70 years and above presented cancer prevalence about three times higher (prevalence ratio 2.9, p<0.01), and greater likelihood to present PSA level above 10.0ng/ml at diagnosis (odds ratio 2.63, p<0.01). The group of elderly men also presented prevalence of histologically aggressive disease (Gleason 8-10) 3.6 times higher (p<0.01), and 5-fold greater prevalence of metastases (PR 4.95, p<0.05).Conclusions:Prostate cancer screening in men aged over 70 may be relevant in Brazil, considering the absence of systematic screening, higher prevalence and higher probability of high-risk disease found in this age range of the population studied.

Histopathology, pharmacotherapy, and predictors of prostatic malignancy in elderly male patients with raised prostate-specific antigen levels - A prospective study.

Background:Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among adult men in the world, and the diagnosis requires biopsy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test along with digital rectal examination (DRE) increases the detection rate of prostate cancer than DRE alone. The objective of this study was to correlate serum PSA level with histopathological diagnosis, identify the predictors of malignancy, and describe the pharmacotherapy of patients with serum PSA levels >4 ng/ml.Materials and Methods:This was a hospital-based observational study done among patients who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms and PSA levels >4 ng/ml who were planned to undergo prostatic biopsy. DRE followed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) assessment and guided sextant (6-core) prostatic biopsy was performed.Results:One hundred and four patients were screened and 87 were included. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with malignancy, and among them, eight had bone metastasis. Spearman's correlation coefficient between PSA and malignancy was 0.449 (P ≤ 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that the factors (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence interval; P value) such as increasing age (1.127; 1.013, 1.253; 0.027), nodular prostate (22.668; 4.655, 110.377; P < 0.001), and PSA (1.034; 1.004, 1.064; 0.024) were significant predictors of prostate cancer. All patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were advised a combination therapy with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor and selective alpha-1 receptor antagonist while those with malignancy were prescribed androgen deprivation therapy with antiosteoporosis therapy.Conclusion:In elderly patients with raised PSA levels or suspicious DRE findings, TRUS-guided prostate is recommended to rule out malignancy and plan appropriate management.

Factors affecting the diagnosis of prostate cancer through 12 quadrant guided prostate biopsy

Purpose Investigate the factors affecting the efficacy of the widely used 12-quadrant prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods The data of 1846 male patients between 45 and 75 years of age was evaluated. The patients were subdivided into groups according to age, blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels prostate volume (PV), digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, and pathology results. The tumour detection rates in the 12-quadrant biopsies were compared with PV, PSA levels, and DRE results of the grouped patients. Results The tumour detection rate decreased with increasing PV in patients 45–75 years of age and with a PSA level ≤ 14.5. No decrease was detected in patients 45–60 years of age or those aged 61–75 years with a PSA ≤ 6.99 and suspicious DRE findings. A decrease in the tumour detection rate with increasing PV was observed in the other three subgroups of patients in this age group, who had a PSA ≤ 6.99, and normal DRE findings but a PV ≤ 40, PV 41–80, or PV ≥ 81. Conclusions Even though there is no statistically significant relationship between PV and the prostate cancer detection rate in patients 45–60 years of age, the cancer detection rate decreased with increasing PV in three of the four subgroups of patients between the ages of 61 and 75 years. Our study results have demonstrated that an individualised approach can play an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Sexual Dysfunction and Enlargement of Seminal Vesicles in Sexually Active Men Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Alpha-blockers

To evaluate sexual dysfunction and enlargement of seminal vesicles in sexually active men who were treated by α1-blockers for benign prostatic hyperplasia and its possible clinical application. This is a prospective cohort study from January 2015 to December 2016. We enrolled sexually active men above the age of 40 years having moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We excluded patients with a history of prostate surgery, suspicious digital rectal examination findings, a serum prostate-specific antigen of >4 ng/dL, and a history of medication with anticholinergic, cholinergic, and diuretic agents. Patients were divided into groups A, B, and C based on the prescription of silodosin 8 mg, tamsulosin 0.4 mg, or alfuzosin 10 mg orally once for LUTS and at 4 and 12 weeks. The mean age was 54.8 years (41-68 years). Twelve weeks of treatment with silodosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin resulted in a significant improvement in the total International Prostate Symptom Score and the quality of life score (P <.001). The baseline erectile function scores were 26.4, 27.6, and 28.1, and the baseline overall satisfaction (OS) (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]-OS) scores were 7.1, 8.3, and 8.6 among groups A, B, and C, respectively. After 12 weeks of α1-blockers, the IIEF-erectile function scores were 24.0, 24.7, and 26.2, and the IIEF-OS scores were 6.4, 7.8, and 7.9. All 3 groups demonstrated a statistically significant enlargement of seminal vesicles after 12 weeks' treatment, most significant in group A patients (7.65-14.11 cc, P <.001). Alpha-blockers as silodosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin are a safe and effective tool in benign prostatic hyperplasia for improving LUTS and the quality of life. Loss of seminal emission with alpha-blockers appears as the cause of seminal vesicle enlargement. The exact mechanism of these findings needs further clinical and experimental research.

TRUS Biopsy Yield in Indian Population: A Retrospective Analysis.

The reported cancer detection rate of Trans-Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsies (TRUS biopsy yield) has been around 30 percent in western countries. However it is much lower in Asian countries, including India. Hence a larger proportion of patients in India undergo unnecessary biopsies. To find out the cancer detection rate of TRUS biopsy (TRUS biopsy yield) in contemporary Indian population. Also, to study the positive predictive values at different serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)/PSA Density (PSAD) cut off levels and suspicious Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) findings. This retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care institute. All symptomatic patients who underwent TRUS guided biopsy for indication of raised serum PSA level (>4 ng/ml) or suspicious DRE findings (nodule, irregularity, hard consistency, immobile rectal mucosa) from January 2012 to December 2014 were included. For serum PSA range (4-10) ng/ml, TRUS guided biopsy was done in patients with percent free/total PSA < 25. Statistical analysis used were Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman's rank correlation analysis and Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Out of the 235 patients included, 60 patients had malignancy (overall cancer detection rate= 25.53%). The cancer detection rate for PSA ranges of (4-10) and (10-20) ng/ml was as low as 5.95% and 13.16% respectively. Patients with malignant disease had significantly smaller prostate gland size than patients with benign disease (53.89 vs 63.06; p-value <0.05). On the other hand, cancer detection rate was 100% for PSA greater than 50ng/ml. The cancer detection rates were only upto 10% for PSA density ranges upto 0.25 ng/ml/cm3. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for PSA and PSAD was 0.876 and 0.884 respectively. Only one patient (0.43%) had post-biopsy complication (acute bacterial prostatitis) requiring hospital admission. The current serum PSA and PSAD cut offs of 4 ng/ml and 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 need to be raised for Indian population to increase its positive predictive value. Prospective study validation of this finding is lacking.

Is there any association between National Institute of Health category IV prostatitis and prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer?

ABSTRACTPurposeWe investigated the association between National Institute of Health category IV prostatitis and prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer.Materials and MethodsThe data of 440 patients who had undergone prostate biopsies due to high PSA levels and suspicious digital rectal examination findings were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of accompanying NIH IV prostatitis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: Gleason score>6, PSA level>20ng/mL, >2 positive cores, >50% cancerous tissue per biopsy, urinary tract infection, urological interventions at least 1 week previously (cystoscopy, urethral catheterization, or similar procedure), history of prostate biopsy, and history of androgen or 5-alpha reductase use. All patient's age, total PSA and free PSA levels, ratio of free to total PSA, PSA density and prostate volume were recorded.ResultsIn total, 101 patients were included in the study. Histopathological examination revealed only PCa in 78 (77.2%) patients and PCa+NIH IV prostatitis in 23 (22.7%) patients. The median total PSA level was 7.4 (3.5–20.0) ng/mL in the PCa+NIH IV prostatitis group and 6.5 (0.6–20.0) ng/mL in the PCa group (p=0.67). The PSA level was≤10ng/mL in 60 (76.9%) patients in the PCa group and in 16 (69.6%) patients in the PCa+NIH IV prostatitis group (p=0.32).ConclusionsOur study showed no statistically significant difference in PSA levels between patients with and without NIH IV prostatitis accompanying PCa.

Local anesthesia type affects cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy

ABSTRACTPurpose:Studies about the anesthesia techniques during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) are usually focused on pain relief. Although patients' tolerance is an important issue in TRUS-Bx, cancer detection rate (CDR) must not be ignored. In this study, we compared the impact of intrarectal lidocaine gel anesthesia (IRLA) and periprostatic nerve blockade (PNB) techniques on CDR.Materials and Methods:A total of 422 patients underwent 10 core-TRUS-Bx because of elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level (>2.5ng/mL) and/or suspicious digital rectal examination findings. Patients were divided into two groups according to the applied anesthesia technique: IRLA group and PNB group. Age, serum PSA level, prostate volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and CDR were recorded and compared statistically with chi square and unpaired t-tests.Results:Of the patients 126/422 (29.9%) underwent TRUS-Bx by using IRLA whereas 296/422 (70.1 %) by PNB technique. The mean, age, serum PSA level and prostate volume were similar between the two groups. CDR was 19.8% and 25.4% in IRLA and PNB groups, respectively (p=0.001). The mean VAS score of the PNB group (1.84±0.89) was significantly lower than that for IRLA group (3.62±1.06) (p=0.001). Conclusions: Our results revealed that PNB is superior to IRLA in terms of CDR. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.

Contemporary outcomes in the detection of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy in Singaporean men with elevated prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination

ObjectiveDespite being the third commonest cancer in Singaporean men, there is a dearth of basic data on the detection rate of prostate cancer and post-procedure complication rates locally using systematic 12-core biopsy. Our objective is to evaluate prostate cancer detection rates using 12-core prostate biopsy based on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings in Singaporean men presenting to a single tertiary centre. The secondary objective is to evaluate the complication rates of transrectal prostate biopsies. MethodsWe retrospectively examined 804 men who underwent first transrectal-ultrasound (TRUS) guided 12-core prostate biopsies from January 2012 to April 2014. Prostate biopsies were performed on men presenting to a tertiary institution when their PSA levels were ≥4.0 ng/mL and/or when they had suspicious DRE findings. ResultsOverall prostate cancer detection rate was 35.1%. Regardless of DRE findings, patients were divided into four subgroups based on their serum PSA levels: 0–3.99 ng/mL, 4.00–9.99 ng/mL, 10.00–19.99 ng/mL and ≥20.00 ng/mL and their detection rates were 9.5%, 20.9%, 38.4% and 72.3%, respectively. The detection rate of cancer based on suspicious DRE findings alone was 59.2% compared to 36.5% based on serum PSA cut-off of 4.0 ng/mL alone. The post-biopsy admission rate for sepsis was 1.5%. ConclusionIn conclusion, using contemporary 12-core biopsy methods, the local prostate cancer detection rate based on serum PSA and DRE findings has increased over the past decade presumably due to multiple genetic and environmental factors. Post-biopsy sepsis remains an important complication worldwide.

Comparison of 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 cores prostate biopsies in determination of prostate cancer and importance of prostate volume

In this study, we evaluate the relationship between increasing core numbers and cancer detection rate. We included 1120 patients with prostate-specific antigen levels ≤20 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal examination findings in this study. All patients had a first-time prostate biopsy and 8, 10, 12, 16, and 20 core biopsies were taken and examined in different groups during the study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was made to reach the factor affecting the cancer detection rate between the patients with and without cancer. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out of 1120 patients, 221 (19.7%) had prostate cancer. Again of the total 1120 patients, 8 core biopsies were taken from 229 (20.4%); 10 core biopsies from 473 (42.2%); 12 core biopsies from 100 (8.9%); 16 core biopsies from 140 (12.5%); and 20 core biopsies from 178 (15.9%) patients. The increase in the core number increased the cancer detection rate by 1.06 times (p = 0.008). As long as prostate volume increases, increasing the core number elevates the cancer detection rate. Thus, the rate of missed cancer will be reduced and the rates of unnecessary repetitive biopsy decreases.

Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection Rates of End-fire and Side-fire Transrectal Ultrasound Probe Configuration

To prospectively test the hypothesis that end-fire transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy probes have greater cancer detection rates than side-fire probes. Retrospective studies have suggested that such probes might have greater cancer detection rates. The present prospective randomized multicenter trial aimed to compare the prostate cancer detection rates of the end-fire versus side-fire probe configuration during transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Patients were randomized according to age, prostate-specific antigen level and prostate volume. An interim analysis was planned after the inclusion of 300 patients. At the interim analysis after the inclusion of 297 patients, no differences were found in the mean prostate-specific antigen level (P = .412), mean age (P = .519), mean prostate volume (P = .730), and positive digital rectal examination findings (P = .295). The prostate cancer detection rate did not differ between the end-fire and side-fire probe (34.3% vs 34.4%, P = .972). On multivariate analysis, suspicious digital rectal examination findings (relative risk 8.185, P < .001), prostate-specific antigen level (relative risk 1.051, P = .041), and prostate volume (relative risk 0.973, P < .001), but not probe configuration (relative risk 0.942, P = .831), were independent predictive factors for the detection of prostate cancer. The interim analysis committee suggested that, because no difference of 5 absolute percent was achieved after 300 patients, no additional recruitment was necessary. Therefore, the study was terminated early. The results of the present study have shown that the transrectal ultrasound probe configuration does not affect the prostate cancer detection rate during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Program for Prostate Cancer Screening Using a Mobile Unit: Results From Brazil

To evaluate the initial results of a prostate cancer screening program using mobile units in Brazil. Since 2004, we have conducted a program of prostate cancer screening using mobile units across 231 municipalities from 6 Brazilian states. A total of 17 571 men were evaluated by clinical history, digital rectal examination (DRE), and serum free and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The recommendations for biopsy were a PSA level of ≥ 4.0 ng/mL, DRE findings suspicious for cancer, or a PSA level of 2.5-4.0 ng/mL with a percent-free PSA level < 15%. The biopsy protocol included 12 biopsy cores from the peripheral zone, 2 from the transition zone, and additional sampling of suspicious areas. The cumulative cancer detection rate was 3.7%. The main indication for biopsy was a PSA level of ≥ 4.0 ng/mL (51.2%), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 44.1%. Another 19.7% of biopsied men had suspicious DRE findings with a normal PSA level (PPV 23.5%). A percent-free PSA level of < 15% in men with a PSA level of 2.5-4.0 ng/mL and normal DRE findings yielded a PPV of 31.1%. The PPV was greater (70.9%) for the 7.1% of men with both suspicious DRE findings and a PSA level of ≥ 4.0 ng/mL. Most cancers were Stage T1-T2 (93.4%), and the percentage of Gleason score of ≥ 7 was 32.5%. The proportion of insignificant cancers according to Epstein's criteria was 13.5%. A mobile prostate cancer screening unit enabled an underserved population to gain access to specialized care through the public healthcare system. The cancer detection rate in this population was similar to those from international studies.

Outcome prediction for prostate cancer detection rate with artificial neural network (ANN) in daily routine

BackgroundWe evaluated the use of the artificial neural network (ANN) program “ProstataClass” of the Department of Urology and the Institute of Medical Informatics at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin in daily routine to increase prostate cancer (CaP) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Materials and methodsFrom May 2005 to April 2007, a total of 204 patients were included in the study. The Beckman Access PSA assay was used, and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) was measured prior to digital rectal examination (DRE) and 12 core systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsies. The individual ANN predictions were generated with the use of the ANN application for the Beckman Access PSA and free PSA assays, which relies on age, PSA, percent free prostate specific antigen (%fPSA), prostate volume, and DRE. Diagnostic validity of total prostate specific antigen (tPSA), %fPSA, and the ANN was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. ResultsPSA and %fPSA ranged from 4.01 to 9.91 ng/ml (median: 6.65) and 5% to 48% (median: 15%), respectively. Of all men, 46 (22.5%) demonstrated suspicious DRE findings. Total prostate volume ranged from 7.1 to 119.2 cc (median: 35). Overall, 71 (34.8%) CaP were detected. Of men with suspicious DRE, 28 (60.9%) had CaP on initial biopsy. The ANN was 78% accurate in the original report. The AUC of ROC curve analysis was 0.51 for PSA, 0.66 for %PSA, and 0.72 for the ANN-Output, respectively. ConclusionsOur results in this independent cohort show that ANN is a very helpful parameter in daily routine to increase the CaP detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Critical Appraisal of Prostate-specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Screening: 20 Years Later

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is secreted by all types of prostate epithelial cells and has been used for 2 decades as a biologic marker for prostate cancer (PCa). Since the implementation of PSA screening in the United States, the detection of PCa has increased, accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of high-grade cancer and PCa-specific mortality rates. It has been suggested that these decreases have resulted from the enhanced detection of PCa while still curable. These data have been the impetus for early detection programs, which have recommended the initiation of screening as early as 40 years of age. Despite widespread use, PSA screening remains controversial, principally because of the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrating a mortality benefit that could outweigh the concerns of the costs of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Two ongoing, randomized controlled trials are examining whether screening reduces the risk of PCa-related mortality, and the results of these studies are expected soon. Although it has its limitations, PSA still remains the best-studied marker for the detection of PCa.