Acute Kidney Injury Survivors Research Articles

Initial renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality associates with 90-day postdischarge RRT dependence in critically ill AKI survivors

PurposeReal-world comparison of RRT modality on RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among ICU patients discharged alive after RRT for acute kidney injury (AKI). MethodsUsing claims-linked to US hospital discharge data (Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database [PHD]), we compared continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) vs. intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for AKI in adult ICU patients discharged alive from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was defined as ≥2 RRT treatments in the last 8 days. Between-group differences were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). ResultsOf 34,804 patients, 3804 patients (from 382 hospitals) had claims coverage for days 83–90 postdischarge. Compared to IHD-treated patients (n = 2740), CRRT-treated patients (n = 1064) were younger; had more admission to large teaching hospitals, surgery, sepsis, shock, mechanical ventilation, but lower prevalence of comorbidities (p < 0.05 for all). Compared to IHD-treated patients, CRRT-treated patients had lower RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and lower RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006) with weighted adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.47–0.97), p = 0.03. Results persisted in sensitivity analyses including patients who died during days 1–90 postdischarge (n = 112) or excluding patients from hospitals with IHD patients only (n = 335), or when excluding patients who switched RRT modalities (n = 451). ConclusionsAdjusted for potential confounders, the odds of RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among survivors of RRT for AKI was 30% lower for those treated first with CRRT vs. IHD, overall and in several sensitivity analyses. SummaryCritically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU) may develop acute kidney injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy (RRT) to temporarily replace the injured kidney function of cleaning the blood. Two main types of RRT in the ICU are called continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is performed almost continuously, i.e., for >18 h per day, and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), which is a more rapid RRT that is usually completed in a little bit over 6 h, several times per week. The slower CRRT may be gentler on the kidneys and is more likely to be used in the sickest patients, who may not be able to tolerate IHD. We conducted a data-analysis study to evaluate whether long-term effects on kidney function (assessed by ongoing need for RRT, i.e., RRT dependence) differ depending on use of CRRT vs. IHD. In a very large US linked hospital-discharge/claims database we found that among ICU patients discharge alive after RRT for AKI, fewer CRRT-treated patients had RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and at 90 days after discharge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006). In adjusted models, RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was >30% lower for CRRT than IHD-treated patients. These results from a non-randomized study suggest that among survivors of RRT for AKI, CRRT may result in less RRT dependence 90 days after hospital discharge.

Kidney Disease Awareness and Knowledge Among Families and Pediatric Survivors of Severe Acute Kidney In

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in pediatric patients and is associated with poor outcomes including increased risk of chronic kidney disease. It is unknown whether pediatric AKI survivors and their families are aware of their AKI diagnosis and understand the associated risks. We are seeking to identify awareness and disease-specific knowledge among pediatric AKI survivors and their families.&#x0D; Objectives: We hypothesize that pediatric AKI survivors and their families have a low awareness of their diagnosis and want more information about kidney health.&#x0D; Design/Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of AKI awareness and knowledge in pediatric patients with KDIGO Stage II or III AKI and their families near the time of discharge from Riley Hospital for Children. Families answered questions on AKI diagnosis awareness and AKI knowledge using the Kidney Knowledge Survey (KiKS).&#x0D; Results: Of 16 families included in this analysis, 75% were unaware they had experienced AKI and 94% were unaware they had a ‘problem with their kidneys’. Overall, the median AKI objective knowledge score was 60% (IQR: 31%, 69%). There was no difference in knowledge score between those that recognized their episode of AKI and those that did not. In total, 69% of families correctly defined AKI as when ‘your kidneys suddenly stop working well’. Most families recognized dehydration (56%) and infection (81%) as risk factors for AKI, however fewer recognized other risk factors such as ibuprofen use (31%). Only 38% of families reported that someone had discussed AKI during their admission, and 88% stated they wanted to learn more about AKI.&#x0D; Conclusion: Most families of pediatric survivors of severe AKI were unaware that their child had AKI or problems with their kidneys. Many lacked understanding of AKI risk factors and knowledge of kidney health and desired more information.

Impact of Acute Kidney Injury After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: ANationwide Study.

In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) on the prognosis and especially on future kidney function has been sparsely examined, and data from large cohorts are warranted. With Danish nationwide registries, we identified all patients undergoing TAVR from 2014 to 2021 with no previous dialysis treatment. According to 2 plasma creatinine samples, we identified those suffering a postprocedural AKI within 21 days after TAVR. With 1 year of follow-up, we compared the associated rates of dialysis treatment and death between patients with and without an AKI using multivariable Cox analysis. Finally, according to the lowest recorded creatinine sample, we assessed the kidney function among AKI survivors between 90 and 180 days after the index date. We identified 4091 TAVRs: 193 (4.7%) with AKI (55.4% men; median age, 82 years) and 3898 (95.3%) without AKI (57.0% men; median age, 81 years). Compared with those without AKI, patients with AKI showed increased associated 1-year rates of dialysis treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 7.20 [95% CI, 4.10-12.66]) and death (HR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.59-3.58]). After 6 months, 74% of AKI survivors had complete kidney recovery, 14.7% had incomplete kidney recovery, 6.3% failed to recover, and 5.1% were on dialysis treatment. We identified that AKI after TAVR was associated with an increased rate of future dialysis treatment and all-cause death. Among survivors, 74% had complete kidney recovery within 6 months.

Challenges in the Care of Patients with AKI Receiving Outpatient Dialysis: AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report.

Up to one third of survivors of AKI that required dialysis (AKI-D) during hospitalization remain dialysis dependent at hospital discharge. Of these, 20%-60%, depending on the clinical setting, eventually recover enough kidney function to stop dialysis, and the remainder progress to ESKD. To describe the challenges facing those still receiving dialysis on discharge, the AKINow Committee conducted a group discussion comprising 59 participants, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. The discussion was framed by a patient who described gaps in care delivery at different transition points and miscommunication between care team members and the patient. Group discussions collected patient perspectives of ( 1 ) being often scared and uncertain about what is happening to and around them and ( 2 ) the importance of effective and timely communication, a comfortable physical setting, and attentive and caring health care providers for a quality health care experience. Provider perspectives included ( 1 ) the recognition of the lack of evidence-based practices and quality indicators, the significant variability in current care models, and the uncertain reimbursement incentives focused on kidney recovery and ( 2 ) the urgency to address communication barriers among hospital providers and outpatient facilities. The workgroup identified key areas for future research and policy change to ( 1 ) improve communication among hospital providers, dialysis units, and patients/care partners; ( 2 ) develop tools for risk classification, subphenotyping, and augmented clinical decision support; ( 3 ) improve education to providers, staff, and patients/care partners; ( 4 ) identify best practices to improve relevant outcomes; ( 5 ) validate quality indicators; and ( 6 ) assess the effect of social determinants of health on outcomes. We urge all stakeholders involved in the process of AKI-D care to align goals and work together to fill knowledge gaps and optimize the care to this highly vulnerable patient population.

Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Post-Acute Kidney Injury Clinic on Awareness and Knowledge in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) awareness and knowledge among survivors is poor, leading to suboptimal self-management and follow-up care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic on AKI awareness and knowledge among survivors. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study among stage 2-3 AKI survivors who were followed in the multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic, comprising nephrologists, renal nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians. Patients were evaluated before and after entering the clinic during a 3-month follow-up period, using a three-component questionnaire including the following: (1) Do you know of your AKI diagnosis during hospitalization? (yes/no), (2) how do you rate your AKI knowledge? (ranging from 1 or “very low” to 5 or “excellent”), and (3) 25-item objective AKI knowledge survey instrument that covered general knowledge of AKI, nutrition, medication, and symptoms of renal failure. Results: A total of 108 AKI survivors were enrolled, with 37.0%, 41.7%, and 21.3% being stage 2 AKI, stage 3 AKI, and stage 3-dialysis AKI, respectively. Before entering the clinic, 50% of patients were unaware of their AKI during hospitalization. After receiving education from the multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic, all patients became aware they had experienced AKI. The mean perceived knowledge and objective knowledge scores were significantly increased over the 3-month period from 1.6 (0.7) to 3.9 (0.7) out of 5 and 15.4 (3.5) to 21.4 (2.0) out of 25, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Additionally, reverse transformation of the Likert scale to a percentage format also revealed a significant improvement in mean perceived AKI knowledge scores, transitioning from 13.8 ± 16.8 to 73.0 ± 17.6, p < 0.001. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary post-AKI clinic effectively enhanced AKI awareness and knowledge among survivors. These findings highlight the importance of follow-up care and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes associated with increased knowledge.

Optimum Care of AKI Survivors Not Requiring Dialysis after Discharge: An AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report.

AKI survivors experience gaps in care that contribute to worse outcomes, experience, and cost.Challenges to optimal care include issues with information transfer, education, collaborative care, and use of digital health tools.Research is needed to study these challenges and inform optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to promote recovery AKI affects one in five hospitalized patients and is associated with poor short-term and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Among those who survive to discharge, significant gaps in documentation, education, communication, and follow-up have been observed. The American Society of Nephrology established the AKINow taskforce to address these gaps and improve AKI care. The AKINow Recovery workgroup convened two focus groups, one each focused on dialysis-independent and dialysis-requiring AKI, to summarize the key considerations, challenges, and opportunities in the care of AKI survivors. This article highlights the discussion surrounding care of AKI survivors discharged without the need for dialysis. On May 3, 2022, 48 patients and multidisciplinary clinicians from diverse settings were gathered virtually. The agenda included a patient testimonial, plenary sessions, facilitated small group discussions, and debriefing. Core challenges and opportunities for AKI care identified were in the domains of transitions of care, education, collaborative care delivery, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and digital health applications. Integrated multispecialty care delivery was identified as one of the greatest challenges to AKI survivor care. Adequate templates for communication and documentation; education of patients, care partners, and clinicians about AKI; and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary posthospital follow-up plan form the basis for a successful care transition at hospital discharge. The AKINow Recovery workgroup concluded that advancements in evidence-based, patient-centered care of AKI survivors are needed to improve health outcomes, care quality, and patient and provider experience. Tools are being developed by the AKINow Recovery workgroup for use at the hospital discharge to facilitate care continuity.

Adults are just big kids: pediatric considerations for adult critical care nephrology.

In recent years, there has been growing attention to pediatric kidney health, especially pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there has been limited focus on the role of pediatric AKI on adult kidney health, specifically considerations for the critical care physician. We summarize what is known in the field of pediatric AKI to inform adult medical care including factors throughout the early life course, including perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric exposures that impact survivor care later in adulthood. The number of pediatric AKI survivors continues to increase, leading to a higher burden of chronic kidney disease and other long-term co-morbidities later in life. Adult medical providers should consider pediatric history and illnesses to inform the care they provide. Such knowledge may help internists, nephrologists, and intensivists alike to improve risk stratification, including a lower threshold for monitoring for AKI and kidney dysfunction in their patients.

Processes of Care After Hospital Discharge for Survivors of Acute Kidney Injury: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. Monitoring of kidney function, screening for proteinuria, use of statins and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and nephrology follow-up among survivors have not been fully characterized. We examined these processes of care after discharge in survivors of hospitalized AKI. Population-based retrospective cohort study. Adults in Alberta, Canada, admitted to the hospital between 2009 and 2017, then followed from their discharge date until 2019 for a median follow-up of 2.7 years. Hospital-acquired AKI diagnostically conforming to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) serum creatinine criteria for stage 2 or stage 3 disease, or the need for acute dialysis. Outcomes after hospital discharge included the proportion of participants who had evaluation of kidney function, were seen by a specialist or general practitioner, and received postdischarge prescriptions for recommended medications for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Cumulative incidence curves to characterize the proportion of participants who received each process of care outcome within the first 90 days and subsequent 1-year follow-up period after hospital discharge. To avoid risks associated with multiple hypothesis testing, differences were not statistically compared across groups. The cohort (n=23,921) included 50.2% men (n=12,015) with a median age of 68.1 [IQR, 56.9-78.8] years. Within 90 days after discharge, 21.2% and 8.6% of patients with and without pre-existing CKD, respectively, were seen by a nephrologist; 60.1% of AKI survivors had at least 1 serum creatinine measured, but only 25.5% had an assessment for albuminuria within 90 days after discharge; 52.7% of AKI survivors with pre-existing CKD, and 51.6% with de novo CKD were prescribed a RAAS inhibitor within 4-15 months after discharge. Retrospective data were collected as part of routine clinical care. The proportion of patients receiving optimal care after an episode of AKI in Alberta was low and may represent a target for improving long-term outcomes for this population. A study in Alberta, Canada, examined the care received by patients with acute kidney disease (AKI) during hospitalization and after discharge between 2007 and 2019. The results showed that a low proportion of patients with moderate to severe AKI were seen by a kidney specialist during hospitalization or within 90 days after discharge. Fewer than 25% of AKI patients had their kidney function monitored with both blood and urine tests within 90 days of discharge. Additionally, about half of AKI survivors with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were prescribed guideline recommended medications for CKD within 15 months after discharge. There is potential to improve health care delivery to these patients both in hospital and after hospital discharge.

The Role of Erythropoietin Levels in Predicting Long-Term Outcomes following Severe Acute Kidney Injury

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors are at an increased risk of chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and mortality. Little is known about the effect of erythropoietin (EPO), a kidney-producing hormone, in post-AKI setting. We aimed to investigate the role of EPO as a predictor of long-term outcomes in post-severe AKI survivors. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of post-AKI cohort conducted between August 2018 and December 2021. Adults who survived severe AKI stages 2–3 were enrolled. Serum EPO was obtained at 1 month after hospital discharge. We explored whether EPO level could predict long-term kidney outcomes at 12 months including mortality, kidney replacement therapy, doubling serum creatinine, and major adverse kidney events at 365 days. Results: One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. Median EPO level was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (28.9 [interquartile range: 16.2–50.7] versus 11.6 mU/mL [7.5–22.3], p = 0.003). The best EPO level cut-off was 16.2 mU/mL (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 62.1%). Serum EPO predicted 12-month mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69. Combining clinical model using age, baseline, and discharge kidney function with serum EPO improved prediction with AUC of 0.74. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that high-level of EPO group had significantly higher mortality compared with low-level EPO group (15.2% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.020). Hematocrit was significantly lower in high-level EPO group compared with low-level EPO group at 12 months (33.4 ± 1.1% vs. 36.0 ± 0.9%, p = 0.038). Conclusions: Plasma EPO appears to be a useful marker for predicting long-term outcome in post-severe AKI survivors.

Association of HIV and viral suppression status with hospital acute kidney injury in the era of antiretroviral therapy

In the modern era, it is unknown if people that are virally suppressed with HIV (PWH) are at increased risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to people without HIV and no studies have compared the risk of AKI by viral suppression status. Here, we determined the associations of HIV status and AKI among PWH with and without viral suppression compared to people without HIV. An observational cohort study of PWH and people without HIV hospitalized in a large New York City health system between 2010-2019 was conducted. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between HIV status and risk of AKI, severe AKI and development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Among 173,884 hospitalized patients, 4,718 had HIV; 2,532 (53.7%) were virally suppressed and 2,186 (46.3%) were not suppressed. Compared to people without HIV, PWH with and without viral suppression were at increased risk of AKI (adjusted hazard ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.15, 1.40 and 1.73, 1.58, 1.90, respectively) and AKI requiring kidney replacement therapy (1.89, 1.27, 2.84 and 1.87, 1.23, 2.84, respectively). Incremental, graded associations were observed between HIV status and Stage 2 or 3 AKI, and among AKI survivors, and incident CKD. The elevated risk of AKI across ages of PWH was similar in magnitude to older people without HIV. Thus, regardless of virologic control, HIV is an independent risk factor for AKI among hospitalized patients. Future studies should determine the mechanisms by which HIV increases susceptibility to AKI and identify strategies to prevent AKI in PWH.

Subgroups of Patients with Distinct Health Utility Profiles after AKI.

A large amount of inter-individual variability exists in health-related quality of life outcomes following acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to determine if subgroups of early AKI survivors could be identified based on distinct health utility impairment profiles ascertained at 60 days after AKI and if these subgroups differed in clinical and biomarker characteristics at index hospitalization and outcomes at 1-year follow up. This retrospective analysis used data from the BioMaRK study, an observational subcohort of the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study. Of 402 patients who survived to 60 days after AKI, 338 completed the Health Utility Index-3 survey which measures impairments in 8 health attributes. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct health utility profiles. Three subgroups with distinct health utility impairment profiles were identified: Low (28% of participants), Moderate (58%) and High (14%) with a median of 1, 4, and 6 impairments across the 8 health attributes at 60 days after AKI, respectively. Patient subgroups differed in weight, history of cerebrovascular disease, intensity of dialysis, hospital length of stay, and dialysis dependence. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen at index hospitalization did not differ among the 3 subgroups. The High impairment subgroup had higher levels of interleukin-6 and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 at study day 1. The 3 subgroups had different 1-year mortality rates: 5% in the Low, 21% in the Moderate, and 52% in the High impairment subgroup. Patient subgroups with distinct health utility impairment profiles can be identified 60 days after AKI. These subgroups have different characteristics at index hospitalization. A higher level of impairment at 60 days was associated with decreased survival.

Follow-up Care of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study

To evaluate follow-up care of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Retrospective cohort study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI in Alberta, Canada from 2005 to 2018, who survived to discharge without kidney replacement therapy or estimated glomerular filtration rate<15mL/min/1.73m2. AKI (defined as≥50% or≥0.3mg/dL serum creatinine increase). The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of an outpatient serum creatinine and urine protein measurement at 3 months postdischarge. Secondary outcomes included an outpatient serum creatinine or urine protein measurement or a nephrologist visit at 3 months postdischarge. Patients were followed from hospital discharge until the first of each outcome of interest, death, emigration from the province, kidney replacement therapy (maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation), or end of study period (March 2019). We used non-parametric methods (Aalen-Johansen) to estimate the cumulative incidence functions of outcomes accounting for competing events (death and kidney replacement therapy). There were 29,732 critically ill adult patients with AKI. The median age was 68 years (IQR, 57-77), 39% were female, and the median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 72mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 53-90). The cumulative incidence of having an outpatient creatinine and urine protein measurement at 3 months postdischarge was 25% (95% CI, 25-26). At 3 months postdischarge, 64% (95% CI, 64-65) had an outpatient creatinine measurement, 28% (95% CI, 27-28) had a urine protein measurement, and 5% (95% CI, 4-5) had a nephrologist visit. We lacked granular data, such as urine output. Many critically ill patients with AKI do not receive the recommended follow-up care. Our findings highlight a gap in the transition of care for survivors of critical illness and AKI.

#4573 IMPACT OF A REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING ON UNPLANNED READMISSIONS IN ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY SURVIVORS

Abstract Background and Aims At least 30% of acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors lack appropriate follow up after hospital discharge. AKI survivors have highly dynamic posthospital course which warrants close monitoring to prevent adverse outcomes. Digital health solutions like remote patient monitoring (RPM) could be used to improve quality and efficiency of AKI survivor care. The purpose for this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the Mayo Clinic AKI RPM program, launched in October 2021. Method The Mayo Clinic AKI RPM program enrolled individuals who experienced AKI during a hospitalization and underwent nephrology consultation (Figure 1). Feasibility was assessed as the proportion of individuals approached for AKI RPM enrollment during the first year of the program who submitted at least one set of vital signs after discharge. An effectiveness analysis compared stage 3 AKI survivors enrolled in AKI RPM with at least 30-days of follow-up to matched historical controls (3:1) sampled from before RPM was available (2018-2021). The primary endpoint was hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit within 30-days, assessed with the Chi-square test. Secondarily we explored time to first readmission or ED visit with a Kaplan-Meier survival curve with a non-parametric comparison between groups, as well as readmission length of stay with the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test due to right skewed data distribution. Results Of the 50 individuals approached for AKI RPM participation, 45 (90%) submitted at least one set of vitals. Among AKI RPM patients, 34 patients with stage 3 AKI were matched to 102 controls based on baseline characteristics and demographics. Dialysis during hospitalization (liberated by discharge) was used in 36 (27%) of patients. Sixty (44%) individuals required ICU level of care. Median (IQR) discharge estimated glomerular filtration rate was 15 (11, 27) mL/min/1.73m2. Through matching, groups were well balanced with respect to pertinent baseline demographics. Hospital readmission or ED visit occurred in 17 (50%) of AKI RPM patients within 30-days compared to 39 (38%) of controls within 30-days (P = .23). The endpoint appeared driven by ED visits within 30-days, not readmissions [At least one ED visit: 13 (38%) vs 21 (21%), respectively (P = .04); At least one hospital readmission: 7 (21%) vs 26 (26%), respectively (P = .56)]. Time to first readmission or ED visit within 30-days was similar between groups (P = .35; Figure 2). Among the 33 patients who were readmitted to the hospital within 30-days, readmission length of stay was similar in the AKI RPM group compared to controls [Median (IQR) 76 (10.6, 121) hours vs 108 (70, 165) hours); P = 0.33]. Conclusion In conclusion, AKI RPM was a feasible program when used to bridge the care continuum (hospital to home) in non-dialysis dependent AKI survivors. Incidence of at least one hospital readmission or ED visit within 30-days was statistically similar between AKI RPM patients and controls. More AKI RPM patients experienced ED encounters in the 30-days after discharge, but frequency of hospital readmission was similar. Digital health solutions such as RPM offer a unique opportunity to address the important gap in AKI care after discharging from the hospital. Additional research is needed to explore the impact of AKI RPM on patient outcomes.

Comprehensive Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care: Protocol for the Randomized Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions Pilot Trial.

Innovative care models are needed to address gaps in kidney care follow-up among acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. We developed the multidisciplinary AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, which embeds post-AKI care in patients' primary care clinic. The objective of this randomized pilot trial is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the ACT program and study protocol, including recruitment and retention, procedures, and outcome measures. The study will be conducted at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center with a local primary care practice. Individuals who are included have stage 3 AKI during their hospitalization, do not require dialysis at discharge, have a local primary care provider, and are discharged to their home. Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and recipients of any transplant within 100 days of enrollment are excluded. Consented patients are randomized to receive the intervention (ie, ACT program) or usual care. The ACT program intervention includes predischarge kidney health education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge laboratory monitoring (serum creatinine and urine protein assessment) and follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. The usual care group receives no specific study-related intervention, and any aspects of AKI care are at the direction of the treating team. This study will examine the feasibility of the ACT program, including recruitment, randomization and retention in a trial setting, and intervention fidelity. The feasibility and acceptability of participating in the ACT program will also be examined in qualitative interviews with patients and staff and through surveys. Qualitative interviews will be deductively and inductively coded and themes compared across data types. Observations of clinical encounters will be examined for discussion and care plans related to kidney health. Descriptive analyses will summarize quantitative measures of the feasibility and acceptability of ACT. Participants' knowledge about kidney health, quality of life, and process outcomes (eg, type and timing of laboratory assessments) will be described for both groups. Clinical outcomes (eg, unplanned rehospitalization) up to 12 months will be compared with Cox proportional hazards models. This study received funding from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality on April 21, 2021, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board on December 14, 2021. As of March 14, 2023, seventeen participants each have been enrolled in the intervention and usual care groups. Feasible and generalizable AKI survivor care delivery models are needed to improve care processes and health outcomes. This pilot trial will test the ACT program, which uses a multidisciplinary model focused on primary care to address this gap. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05184894; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05184894. DERR1-10.2196/48109.

Patient level factors increase risk of acute kidney disease in hospitalized children with acute kidney injury.

Studies in adults have shown that persistent kidney dysfunction ≥7-90 days following acute kidney injury (AKI), termed acute kidney disease (AKD), increases chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality risk. Little is known about the factors associated with the transition of AKI to AKD and the impact of AKD on outcomes in children. The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors for progression of AKI to AKD in hospitalized children and to determine if AKD is a risk factor for CKD. Retrospective cohort study of children age ≤18 years admitted with AKI to all pediatric units at a single tertiary-care children's hospital between 2015 and 2019. Exclusion criteria included insufficient serum creatinine values to evaluate for AKD, chronic dialysis, or previous kidney transplant. A total of 528 children with AKI were included in the study. There were 297 (56.3%) hospitalized AKI survivors who developed AKD. Among children with AKD, 45.5% developed CKD compared to 18.7% in the group without AKD (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.1-7.4, p-value <0.001 using multivariable logistic regression analysis including other covariates). Multivariable logistic regression model identified age at AKI diagnosis, PCICU and NICU admission, prematurity, malignancy, bone marrow transplant, previous AKI, mechanical ventilation, AKI stage, duration of kidney injury, and need for kidney replacement therapy during day 1-7 as risk factors for AKD after AKI. AKD is common among hospitalized children with AKI and multiple risk factors are associated with AKD. Children that progress from AKI to AKD are at higher risk of developing CKD. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Risk factors and 180-day mortality of acute kidney disease in critically ill patients: A multi-institutional study.

Critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) have a poor prognosis. Recently, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) proposed to define acute kidney disease (AKD) as acute or subacute damage and/or loss of kidney function post AKI. We aimed to identify the risk factors for the occurrence of AKD and to determine the predictive value of AKD for 180-day mortality in critically ill patients. We evaluated 11,045 AKI survivors and 5,178 AKD patients without AKI, who were admitted to the intensive care unit between 1 January 2001 and 31 May 2018, from the Chang Gung Research Database in Taiwan. The primary and secondary outcomes were the occurrence of AKD and 180-day mortality. The incidence rate of AKD among AKI patients who did not receive dialysis or died within 90 days was 34.4% (3,797 of 11,045 patients). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AKI severity, underlying early CKD, chronic liver disease, malignancy, and use of emergency hemodialysis were independent risk factors of AKD, while male gender, higher lactate levels, use of ECMO, and admission to surgical ICU were negatively correlated with AKD. 180-day mortality was highest among AKD patients without AKI during hospitalization (4.4%, 227 of 5,178 patients), followed by AKI with AKD (2.3%, 88 of 3,797 patients) and AKI without AKD (1.6%, 115 of 7,133 patients). AKI with AKD had a borderline significantly increased risk of 180-day mortality (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00-1.78; p = 0.047), while patients with AKD but no preceding AKI episodes had the highest risk (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.71-2.97; p < 0.001). The occurrence of AKD adds limited additional prognostic information for risk stratification of survivors among critically ill patients with AKI but could predict prognosis in survivors without prior AKI.

Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care Following Hospital Discharge: A Mixed-Methods Study of Nephrologists and Primary Care Providers.

Widespread delivery of high-quality care for acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors after hospital discharge requires a multidisciplinary team. We aimed to compare management approaches between nephrologists and primary care providers (PCPs) and explored strategies to optimize collaboration. Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study using a case-based survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Nephrologists and PCPs providing AKI survivor care at 3 Mayo Clinic sites and the Mayo Clinic Health System were included. Survey questions and interviews elucidated participants' recommendations for post-AKI care. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey responses. Qualitative data analysis used deductive and inductive strategies. A connecting and merging approach was used for mixed-methods data integration. 148 of 774 (19%) providers submitted survey responses (24/72 nephrologists and 105/705 PCPs). Nephrologists and PCPs recommended laboratory monitoring and follow-up with a PCP shortly after hospital discharge. Both indicated that the need for nephrology referral, and its timing should be dictated by clinical and non-clinical patient-specific factors. There were opportunities for improvement in medication and comorbid condition management in both groups. Incorporation of multidisciplinary specialists (eg, pharmacists) was recommended to expand knowledge, optimize patient-centered care, and alleviate provider workload. Survey findings may have been affected by non-response bias and the unique challenges facing clinicians and health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were from a single health system, and their views or experiences may differ from those in other health systems or serving different populations. A multidisciplinary team-based model of post-AKI care may facilitate implementation of a patient-centered care plan, improve adherence to best practices, and reduce clinician and patient burden. Individualizing care for AKI survivors based on clinical and non-clinical patient-specific factors is needed to optimize outcomes for patients and health systems.

Increased Serum Sodium at Acute Kidney Injury Onset Predicts In-Hospital Death.

Over the last decades, acute kidney injury (AKI) has been identified as a potentially fatal diagnosis which substantially increases in-hospital mortality in the short term and morbidity/mortality in the long term. However, reliable biomarkers for predicting AKI-associated outcomes are still missing. In this study, we assessed whether serum sodium, measured at different time points during the in-hospital treatment period, provided prognostic information in AKI. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. AKI subjects were identified via the in-hospital AKI alert system. Serum sodium and potassium levels were documented at five pre-defined time points: hospital admission, AKI onset, minimum estimated glomerular filtration rate, minimum and maximum of the respective electrolyte during the treatment period. In-hospital death, the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) and recovery of kidney function were defined as endpoints. Patients who suffered in-hospital death (n = 37, 23.1%) showed significantly higher serum sodium levels at diagnosis of AKI (survivors: 145.7 ± 2.13 vs. non-survivors: 138.8 ± 0.636 mmol/L, P = 0.003). A logistic regression model was significant for serum sodium levels in patients with in-hospital death (X2, P = 0.003; odds ratio = 1.08 (1.022 - 1.141); R2 = 0.082; d = 0.089). This suggests an increase of the relative risk for in-hospital death by 8% with every unit of serum sodium increase. Patients with a sodium above the upper normal range at AKI diagnosis were also more likely to suffer in-hospital death (P = 0.001). In summary, we present evidence that serum sodium, measured at time of AKI diagnosis, potentially serves as a predictor for in-hospital death in patients with AKI.

Acute Kidney Injury and Rehabilitation Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is growing rapidly, along with the increasing geriatric population. CKD patients have higher incidence of fractures, stroke, and hospitalizations requiring rehabilitation. This is accompanied with the need for suitable rehabilitation programs to decrease disability and improve functionality to help elderly CKD patients maintain independence in activities of daily living. Considering that survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) tend to experience decreased quality of life with increased frailty, rehabilitation in the elderly with kidney injury becomes even more complex. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AKI on the outcomes of rehabilitation among elderly patients with CKD. Methods: For this retrospective, observational study, the electronic medical records of all patients who were hospitalized in the rehabilitation department were reviewed. We assessed functional status at the beginning and end of rehabilitation, renal outcome, and all-cause mortality among elderly patients with CKD who experienced an AKI and compared them to those who did not have an AKI. Results: The study cohort included 183 elderly patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD. Patients with AKI (23% of study cohort) had a higher prevalence of heart failure and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, as compared with patients who did not have AKI. They were admitted to rehabilitation at a poorer functional capacity and were also discharged with lower functional independence measure scores. Overall odds ratio for all-cause death among patients with AKI versus without AKI was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.6–6.5; p = 0.001). Conclusion: AKI and CKD are interrelated syndromes. AKI was prevalent among elderly CKD patients and was associated with worse rehabilitation outcomes and higher mortality compared to similar patients without AKI.

The Quality of Discharge Summaries After Acute Kidney Injury.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) increases the risk of hospital readmission, chronic kidney disease, and death. Therefore, effective communication in discharge summaries is essential for safe transitions of care. The objectives of this study were to determine the quality of discharge summaries in AKI survivors and identify predictors of higher quality discharge summaries. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary care academic center in Ontario, Canada. We examined the discharge summary quality of 300 randomly selected adult patients who survived a hospitalization with AKI at our tertiary care hospital, stratified by AKI severity. We included 150 patients each from 2015 to 2016 and 2018 to 2019, before and after introduction of a post-AKI clinic in 2017. We reviewed charts for 9 elements of AKI care to create a composite score summarizing discharge summary quality. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of discharge summary quality. The median discharge summary composite score was 4/9 (interquartile range, 2-6). The least frequently mentioned elements were baseline creatinine (n = 55, 18%), AKI-specific follow-up labs (n = 66, 22%), and medication recommendations (n = 80, 27%). The odds of having a higher quality discharge summary (composite score ≥4/9) was greater for every increase in baseline creatinine of 25 μmol/L (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.56), intrarenal etiology (aOR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.26, 4.27), and increased AKI severity (stage 2 aOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.35, 4.91 and stage 3 aOR: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.56, 7.22). There was no association between discharge summary quality and the years before and after introduction of a post-AKI clinic (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.29). The single-center study design limits generalizability. Most discharge summaries are missing key AKI elements, even in patients with severe AKI. These gaps suggest several opportunities exist to improve discharge summary communication following AKI.