Survival Of Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Efficacy of Integrated Risk Score Using Omics-Based Biomarkers for the Prediction of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Prospective Pilot Study.

Acute rejection (AR) is critical for long-term graft survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the integrated risk score of omics-based biomarkers in predicting AR in KTRs. This prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pilot study enrolled 40 patients who recently underwent high-immunologic-risk kidney transplantation (KT). Five omics biomarkers were measured, namely, blood mRNA (three-gene signature), urinary exosomal miRNA (three-gene signature), urinary mRNA (six-gene signature), and two urinary exosomal proteins (hemopexin and tetraspanin-1) at 2 weeks and every 4 weeks after KT for 1 year. An integrated risk score was generated by summing each biomarker up. The biomarker group was informed about the integrated risk scores and used to adjust immunosuppression, but not the control group. The outcomes were graft function and frequency of graft biopsy. Sixteen patients in the biomarker group and nineteen in the control group completed the study. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate after KT did not differ between the groups. Graft biopsy was performed in two patients (12.5%) and nine (47.4%) in the biomarker and control groups, respectively, with the proportion being significantly lower in the biomarker group (p = 0.027). One patient (6.3%) in the biomarker group and two (10.5%) in the control group were diagnosed with AR, and the AR incidence did not differ between the groups. The tacrolimus trough level was significantly lower in the biomarker group than in the control group at 1 year after KT (p = 0.006). Integrated omics biomarker monitoring may help prevent unnecessary or high-complication-risk biopsy and enables tailored immunosuppression by predicting the risk of AR in KTRs.

Effect of metformin use on graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review protocol

IntroductionMetformin is a first-line antihyperglycaemic agent for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In addition to glycaemic control, it offers benefits related to cardiovascular health, weight neutrality and metabolic syndrome. However, its...

Impact of Prolonged Cold Ischemia Time on Long-Term Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients

Cold ischemia time (CIT) influences short- and long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Most studies proved that prolonged CIT causes increased mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged CIT on patient survival time after lung transplantation (LTx). The retrospective study group consisted of 139 patients who underwent double LTx in a single center between January 2018 and August 2022. Prolonged ischemic time (PIT) was defined as total ischemic time >6 hours and divided into smaller time intervals according to increasing PIT (6-8, 8-10, 10-12, >12 hours). The assessed outcomes were 1- and 4-year survival. Among the study group, PIT was observed in 98% (n = 137), and its average value was 10.33 hours. The prolonged CIT of 6 to 8 hours occurred in 10% (n = 14), 8 to 10 hours in 34% (n = 47), 10 to 12 hours in 36% (n = 49), and >12 hours in 20% (n = 27). In a comparison of 1-year survival between the PIT 6- to 10-hour group and the >10-hour arm (88% vs 78%), the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). PIT is a risk factor for reduced long-term survival in LTx recipients. Increasing PIT may be associated with higher mortality at 1 and 4 years. All efforts to reduce the duration of ischemic time can benefit patient survival after LTx.

The Impact of ABCC2 -24C>T Gene Polymorphism on Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Personalized medicine in kidney transplantation has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes encoding metabolizing enzymes (CYP3A5) and transporters (ABCC2) on clinical outcomes (acute graft failure and/or acute tubular necrosis (ATN)) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study where adult KTR who had undergone kidney transplantation between 2020 and 2021 and received tacrolimus-mycophenolate treatment were enrolled in the study. DNA was extracted from collected blood samples using a commercially available kit. CYP3A5*3, ABCC2 -24C>T and ABCC2 3972C>T SNP were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Of the total 39 patients included, nine (23.1%) KTR had an incidence of acute graft failure and/or ATN. A multiple logistic regression showed wildtype ABCC2 -24C>T C allele had a higher risk of developing acute graft rejection and/or ATN compared to the variant allele carriers (adjusted Odd Ratios [aOR]: 27.675, p = 0.038). Recipients who had delayed graft function (aOR: 49.214, p = 0.012) and a history of CMV infection (aOR: 18.097, p = 0.009) were at 49.2 and 18.1-times increased risk for acute graft failure and/or ATN, respectively. The large aOR was inevitable due to the small sample size and required cautious interpretation. This is the first study to determine the effect of the ABCC2 -24C>T genetic polymorphism on clinical outcomes in Malaysian KTR and forms the basis for further work on ABCC2 -24C>T effects in long-term KTR.

Clinical Characteristics and Survival of Kidney Transplant Recipients with Posttransplant Malignancy

Clinical Characteristics and Survival of Kidney Transplant Recipients with Posttransplant Malignancy

US Liver Transplant Outcomes After Normothermic Regional Perfusion vs Standard Super Rapid Recovery

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is an emerging recovery modality for transplantable allografts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors. In the US, only 11.4% of liver recipients who are transplanted from a deceased donor receive a cDCD liver. NRP has the potential to safely expand the US donor pool with improved transplant outcomes as compared with standard super rapid recovery (SRR). To assess outcomes of US liver transplants using controlled donation after circulatory death livers recovered with normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing liver transplant outcomes from cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR. Outcomes of cDCD liver transplant from January 2017 to May 2023 were collated from 17 US transplant centers and included livers recovered by SRR and NRP (thoracoabdominal NRP [TA-NRP] and abdominal NRP [A-NRP]). Seven transplant centers used NRP, allowing for liver allografts to be transplanted at 17 centers; 10 centers imported livers recovered via NRP from other centers. cDCD livers were recovered by either NRP or SRR. The primary outcome was ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Secondary end points included primary nonfunction (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary anastomotic strictures, posttransplant length of stay (LOS), and patient and graft survival. A total of 242 cDCD livers were included in this study: 136 recovered by SRR and 106 recovered by NRP (TA-NRP, 79 and A-NRP, 27). Median (IQR) NRP and SRR donor age was 30.5 (22-44) years and 36 (27-49) years, respectively. Median (IQR) posttransplant LOS was significantly shorter in the NRP cohort (7 [5-11] days vs 10 [7-16] days; P < .001). PNF occurred only in the SRR allografts group (n = 2). EAD was more common in the SRR cohort (123 of 136 [56.1%] vs 77 of 106 [36.4%]; P = .007). Biliary anastomotic strictures were increased 2.8-fold in SRR recipients (7 of 105 [6.7%] vs 30 of 134 [22.4%]; P = .001). Only SRR recipients had IC (0 vs 12 of 133 [9.0%]; P = .002); IC-free survival by Kaplan-Meier was significantly improved in NRP recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable between cohorts. There was comparable patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients of cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR, with reduced rates of IC, biliary complications, and EAD in NRP recipients. The feasibility of A-NRP and TA-NRP implementation across multiple US transplant centers supports increasing adoption of NRP to improve organ use, access to transplant, and risk of wait-list mortality.

(65) - History of Donor Drug Use and Post-Transplant Survival in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

(65) - History of Donor Drug Use and Post-Transplant Survival in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

(1019) - Long-Term Survival of Lung Transplant Recipients with Connective Tissue Disease and Esophageal Dysfunction: An 11-Year Single-Center Experience

(1019) - Long-Term Survival of Lung Transplant Recipients with Connective Tissue Disease and Esophageal Dysfunction: An 11-Year Single-Center Experience

Impact of preoperative infection on the outcomes of liver transplant recipients: a national propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study in China.

Impact of preoperative infection on liver transplantation (LT) needs further investigation. From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022, 24,122 eligible patients receiving LT were enrolled from the China Liver Transplant Registry database. The outcomes of LT were compared after using the propensity score-matched analysis. Compared to the non-infection group, patients in the infection group were more likely to have postoperative effusion, infection, abdominal bleeding and biliary complications (all P<0.01), and they had shorter 30-day, 90-day survival and overall survival (OS) (all P<0.01). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that MELD score and cold ischemia time were risk factors for the OS in the infection group (both P<0.05). Besides, compared to the non-pulmonary group, patients in the pulmonary group were more likely to have postoperative effusion and infection (both P<0.0001), and less likely to have postoperative abscess and early allograft dysfunction (both P<0.05). Patients in the non-abdominal group also had a higher proportion of postoperative infection than those in the abdominal group (P<0.05). Furthermore, compared to the number=1 group, patients in the number≥2 group were more prone to postoperative effusion and infection (both P<0.01), and they also had shorter 30-day and 90-day survival (both P<0.05). Preoperative infection can result in a higher incidence of early postoperative complications and shorter survival in liver transplant recipients. The types and number of infection sites will also influence the prognosis of liver transplant recipients.

(945) - Outcomes and Risk Factors for Poor Graft Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients with BMI = 35 Kg/m2 - A Single Center Experience

(945) - Outcomes and Risk Factors for Poor Graft Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients with BMI = 35 Kg/m2 - A Single Center Experience

O204: The influence of HLA matching on graft survival in lung transplant recipients is indication specific: An UNOS database analysis

Abstract Background and aims The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching in lung transplantation remains unclear, and the influence of indication in HLA compatibility is unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HLA matching and lung graft survival using a large-scale multi-center database (UNOS/OPTN) and multivariate logistic analysis. The secondary aim was to determine whether this relationship was influenced by transplant indication. Methods This retrospective observational analysis was performed using 26,312 lung transplant recipients from the UNOS/OPTN database. Patients were divided into two groups based on number of HLA mismatches (0-3 mismatches vs 4-6 mismatches) and then subcategorized by indication. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics and visualized using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results Increased HLA mismatch was associated with reduced allograft survival. Adjusted models found that the total HLA mismatch &amp;gt;3 increased the mortality hazard at 15 years (HR 1·05, p &amp;lt;0·05) and 20 years (HR 1·05, p&amp;lt;0·01). Pulmonary hypertension was the only indication with a statistically significant association between HLA mismatch and graft survival. Allografts in patients with 0-3 mismatches survived for 401 days longer than those with 4-6 mismatches (p=0·02). Conclusion Increased HLA mismatch reduced graft survival. When stratified by indication, this association was preserved exclusively in pulmonary hypertension. This finding is of potential clinical relevance to the management of this subsection of lung transplant recipients, impacting organ allocation, transplant surveillance and use of desensitisation and immunosuppression protocols.

MTor-inhibition within the first days after pediatric heart transplantation is a potentially safe option to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Immunosuppression after heart transplantation (HTX) with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors serves as a prophylaxis against rejection and to treat coronary vascular injury. However, there is little data on the early, preventive use of everolimus after pediatric HTX. Retrospective study of 61 pediatric HTX patients (48 cardiomyopathy and 13 congenital heart disease), 28 females, median age 10.1 (range 0.1-17.9) years transplanted between 2008 and 2020. We analyzed survival, rejection, renal function, occurrence of lymphoproliferative disorder, and allograft vasculopathy together with adverse effects of early everolimus therapy combined with low-dose calcineurin inhibitors. Everolimus therapy was started at a median 3.9 (1-14) days after HTX. Median follow-up was 4.3 (range 0.5-11.8) years, cumulative 184 patient years. The estimated 1- and 5-year survival probability was 89% (CI 82%:98%) and 87% (CI 78%:97%). Four patients developed rejection (6.6%) (maximum 2R ISHLT criteria). No patient suffered from chronic renal failure. Three patients (4.9%) developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Five patients suffered relevant wound-healing disorders after transplantation, four of them carrying relevant risk factors before HTX (mechanical circulatory support (n = 3), delayed chest closure after HTX (n = 3)). No recipient developed cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Initiating everolimus within the first 14 days after HTX seems to be well tolerated, enabling a low incidence of rejection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, renal failure, and reveals no evidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy as well as good overall survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation Among COVID-19 Recovered Patients in a Single Transplant Center

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly lowered kidney transplantation (KT) rates worldwide, and studies regarding outcomes of patients who developed COVID-19 infection before KT are limited, especially in low to middle-income countries. To determine the 1-year graft and patient survival of kidney transplant recipients who recovered from COVID-19 infection before KT. We retrospectively reviewed all adult end-stage renal disease patients who underwent KT at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute from June 2020 through October 2021. Transplant parameters, graft and patient survival, pretransplant COVID-19 infection, and post-KT infectious complications were recorded. Data was analyzed using two-tailed descriptive statistical tests. Of the 219 recipients, 23 (11%) had COVID-19 infection within 1 to 16 months before KT. The mean age of KT recipients was 36 years (range, 25-57), and 61.9% had chronic glomerulonephritis as primary renal disease. The mean duration from COVID-19 recovery to KT was 79 days (range, 21-207). There was no significant difference in the 1-year biopsy-proven acute rejection in the 2 groups, at 4.5% vs 12.5% for the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 group, respectively. Both the 1-year graft and patient survival were similar in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups at 98.4% vs 100% and 100% vs 98.44%, respectively. There was no significant difference in biopsy-proven acute rejection, 1-year graft, and patient survival among patients who had a prior COVID-19 infection vs those who did not. Kidney transplantation appears safe when performed at least 1 month from COVID-19 infection.

Features of lipid-lowering therapy in liver transplant recipients

Liver transplantation (LT) requires not only a carefully organized system for monitoring the condition of patients in the early postoperative period, but also reliable coordination of the actions of doctors of different specialties in the long-term period. This is due to improved survival of liver transplant recipients and a shift in the mortality structure towards cardiovascular diseases and the need to correct metabolic complications that often occur in recipients, in particular hyperlipidemia. Treatment of lipid metabolism disorders after LT includes lifestyle changes, immunosuppressive and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), which reduces cardiovascular risk. The use of LLT in patients after LT is limited by potential side effects caused by drug interactions, in particular myopathy up to rhabdomyolysis. According to current clinical guidelines, the safest treatment for patients after LT is pravastatin and fluvastatin, the use of which is limited by low availability and low efficacy. It seems promisingto improve LLT in patients after LT through the use of ezetimibe, which has a potentially favorable tolerability profile when combined with immunosuppressants, as well as pitavastatin, which is metabolized through cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes not involved in the metabolism of immunosuppressants, and metabolically neutral PCSK9 inhibitors.

Preoperative aortic regurgitation and early graft survival in liver transplant recipients

Preoperative aortic regurgitation and early graft survival in liver transplant recipients

Four decades of progress in heart-lung transplantation: Two hundred seventy-one cases at a single institution

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate survival for combined heart-lung transplant (HLTx) recipients across 4 decades at a single institution. We aim to summarize our contemporary practice based on more than 271 HLTx procedures over 40 years. MethodsData were collected from a departmental database and the United Network for Organ Sharing. Recipients younger than age 18 years, those undergoing redo HLTx, or triple-organ system transplantation were excluded, leaving 271 patients for analysis. The pioneering era was defined by date of transplant between 1981 and 2000 (n = 155), and the modern era between 2001 and 2022 (n = 116). Survival analysis was performed using cardinality matching of populations based on donor and recipient age, donor and recipient sex, ischemic time, and sex matching. ResultsBetween 1981 and 2022, 271 HLTx were performed at a single institution. Recipients in the modern era were older (age 42 vs 34 y; P < .001) and had shorter waitlist times (78 vs 234 days; P < .001). Allografts from female donors were more common in the modern era (59% vs 39%; P = .002). In the matched survival analysis, 30-day survival (97% vs 84%; P = .005), 1-year survival (89% vs 77%; P = .041), and 10-year survival (53% vs 26%; P = .012) significantly improved in the modern era relative to the pioneering era, respectively. ConclusionsLong-term survival in HLTx is achievable with institutional experience and may continue to improve in the coming decades. Advances in mechanical circulatory support, improved maintenance immunosuppression, and early recognition and management of acute complications such as primary graft dysfunction and acute rejection have dramatically improved the prognosis for recipients of HLTx in our contemporary institutional experience.

Quantitative flow ratio computed from invasive coronary angiography as a predictor for cardiac allograft vasculopathy after cardiac transplant.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a significant determinant of long-term survival in heart transplant recipients. Standard CAV screening typically utilizes invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computational method for functional testing of coronary stenosis, and may add diagnostic value to ICA in assessing CAV. Consecutive subjects who received heart transplantation and underwent two separate routine coronary angiograms between January 2013 and April 2016 were enrolled. Coronary angiograms and IVUS were performed per local protocol at 1, 2, 3 and 5years post-transplant. QFR was calculated offline. CAV was assessed semi-quantitively based on coronary angiogram results. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Mean time from transplant to first included ICA was 2.1years. QFR in at least 1 coronary vessel was interpretable in 19/22 (86%) of initial ICA (QFR1). QFR1 correlated well with the CAV score derived from the second ICA (CAV2) with a clustering of CAV at lower QFR values. In a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimal QFR threshold of 0.88 yielded 0.94 sensitivity and 0.67 specificity (AUC of 0.79) for at least non-obstructive subsequent CAV. Initial angiographically and intravascular ultrasound derived CAV severity poorly predicted subsequent CAV severity. QFR derived from invasive coronary angiography predicts subsequent development of CAV more accurately than angiography and intravascular ultrasound. This novel method of coronary flow assessment in recipients of heart transplantation may be useful to diagnose and predict subsequent CAV development.

De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies after Heart Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibodies directed against donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can be detected de novo after heart transplantation and play a key role in long-term survival. De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, antibody-mediated rejection, and mortality. Advances in detection methods and international guideline recommendations have encouraged the adoption of screening protocols among heart transplant units. However, there is still a lack of consensus about the correct course of action after dnDSA detection. Treatment is usually started when antibody-mediated rejection is present; however, some dnDSAs appear years before graft failure is detected, and at this point, damage may be irreversible. In particular, class II, anti-HLA-DQ, complement binding, and persistent dnDSAs have been associated with worse outcomes. Growing evidence points towards a more aggressive management of dnDSA. For that purpose, better diagnostic tools are needed in order to identify subclinical graft injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance, strain techniques, or coronary physiology parameters could provide valuable information to identify patients at risk. Treatment of dnDSA usually involves plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption, and ritxumab, but the benefit of these therapies is still controversial. Future efforts should focus on establishing effective treatment protocols in order to improve long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Important Predictor of Survival in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Introduction:The body mass index (BMI) and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) are nutrition-related risk assessment tool and has been used in various clinical settings. The relationship between BMI and the associated risk of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), such as relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM), have been reported (Fuji S et al. BMT. 2014;49:1505). However, the relationship between GNRI and HSCT outcome remains inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the association between GNRI and overall survival (OS), relapse, and NRM of patients who received allogenic HSCT for hematological malignancies. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed aged 16 years or older patients who underwent first allogeneic HSCT from January 2010 to December 2022 at the Jikei university hospital. The primary endpoints of this study was OS at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were NRM, the incidences of relapse, all-grade acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. Nutritional risk was evaluated both BMI and GNRI. Patients were classified into three groups based on pre-transplant BMI (underweight; BMI &amp;lt;18.5, overweight; BMI ≥25, and others as standard), and also classified into three groups based on pre-transplant GNRI (low-risk; GNRI&amp;gt;98, intermediate-risk; 92≤GNR≤98, and high-risk; GNR&amp;lt;92). GNRI was calculated as follows: (1.519 x serum albumin) + (41.7 x current body weight/ ideal body weight). Data on serum albumin level and body weight were collected at the beginning of conditioning regimen. Results:Two hundred and three patients who received allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies (acute myeloid leukemia; n=98, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; n=51, myelodysplastic syndrome; n=27, myeloproliferative neoplasms; n=8, chronic myeloid leukemia; n=18, and other leukemias; n=2) were evaluated. The median age was 52 years old (range 16-69). The median follow-up period of survivors was 1394 days (range 51-4420) after allogeneic HSCT. The donor sources consisted of 39 (19.2%) HLA-matched related donor, 50(24.6%) HLA-mismatched related donor, 26(12.8%) HLA-matched unrelated donor and 88(43.4%) HLA-mismatched unrelated donor. One hundred and nine patients (53.7%) received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Based on the BMI, underweight, standard, overweight were included 33 (16.3%), 139 (68.4%), and 31 (15.3%) patients, respectively. While, based on the GNRI, the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk were divided into 105 (51.7%), 46 (22.8%), and 51 (25.2%) patients, respectively . The 5-year OS rates of standard, underweight, and overweight were 52.6%, 39.5%, and 62.1%, respectively (p=0.07). On the other hand, the 5-year OS of low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 62.6%, 50.4%, and 33.2%, respectively (p=0.01). In addition, multivariate analysis showed high-risk group showed significantly lower OS (p=0.03). Five-year cumulative incidences (CI) of relapse in the standard, underweight, and overweight, were 46.4%, 45.4%, and 25.0%, respectively (p=0.11). However, multivariate analysis showed that CI of relapse ratio was significantly lower in overweight group (p=0.02). While, 5-year CI of relapse rates in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 36.5%, 47.2%, and 52.5%, respectively (p=0.03). However, multivariate analysis showed that there were no significant differences in relapse among three risk groups (p=0.06). There were no significant differences in CI of NRM, acute GVHD and chronic GVHD either BMI or GNRI. Subgroup analysis in the patients who underwent HSCT in complete remission revealed that there was no significant difference in OS among the three BMI groups (p=0.11), as well as the three GNRI groups (p=0.06). For the patients in non-remission at the time of allogeneic HSCT, there was no significant difference in OS between the three groups in BMI; however, OS was shorter in the high-risk group in GNRI (p=0.01). Conclusions:In our study, OS of high-risk group defined by GNRI showed significantly poor , especially in non-remission patients. Although overweight defined by BMI did predict low CI of relapse, overweight did not predict OS. These results suggest that nutrition-related risk assessed by GNRI could be prognostic marker for survival in patients who received allogeneic HSCT.

Statin Use and Its Effects on Survival Outcomes and Rates of Gvhd in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients: Results from Real-World Cohorts

Introduction: The effect of statin use in allogeneic stem cell transplant remains unclear. There have been conflicting results in studies examining the impact of statins on engraftment, graft-versus-host-disease, survival, and long-term outcomes in stem cell transplant recipients. Methods: Retrospective data was extracted using the TriNetX database. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 5 years, risk of death, and graft-versus-host-disease in the two cohorts. Results: 5045 patients were identified in cohort-1 (statin cohort) and 10,181 patients were identified in cohort-2 (non-statin cohort). Table-1 shows patient characteristics at baseline. Propensity-score-matching was used to balance the two cohorts. Patient count in each group after matching was 3702 (Table-2). Overall survival was 59.32% in cohort-1 versus 48.55 % in cohort-2, with HR of 0.685 (95% CI 0.634, 0.740) in favor of cohort 1 (Figure-1). Median OS for cohort-1 was not reached versus 1593 days for cohort-2. Risk of death in cohort-1 and 2 was 0.311 and 0.4 respectively (Figure-2), with a risk difference for the death of -0.089 (95% CI, -0.110, -0.067, p-value &amp;lt;0.001), in favor of cohort-1. Risk of graft-versus-host-disease was 0.648 and 0.674 in cohort-1 and 2 respectively (Figure-3), with a risk difference of -0.026 (95% CI -0.054, 0.002, p-value 0.065), and risk ratio of 0.961 (95% CI 0.921, 1.003). Survival-probability was higher at 5 years in cohort-1 regardless of presence or absence of GVHD. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis of a large patient cohort showed improved OS and decreased risk of death with statin use in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients, regardless of presence or absence of GVHD, even though the average total and LDL cholesterol levels were higher in statin-group. The difference in graft-versus-host-disease was not statistically significant in both cohorts, however, there was a trend towards decrease GVHD in statin-cohort. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large database based study evaluating the effect of statin use on outcomes in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant. Phase 3 clinical trials are needed to further answer this question.