Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivors Research Articles

Oral health-related quality of life among oropharyngeal cancer survivors

ObjectivesThe incidence of oropharyngeal cancer continues to rise in the United States, yet studies on the quality of life (QoL) of oropharyngeal cancer patients are limited. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the impact of oral health on the QoL in oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Materials and MethodsOropharyngeal cancer survivors with a confirmed cancer diagnosis from 1996 to 2016 were sampled from the Utah Cancer Registry. The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was administrated between January and May of 2019. The impact of oral health on QoL was evaluated using simple linear regression (β-coefficient). ResultsAmong the 260 oropharyngeal cancer survivors, the majority were male (84.6 %) and ≥ 60 years of age at the time of cancer diagnosis (74.0 %). The most frequently reported symptoms of OHIP-14 were discomfort while eating any foods (19.2 %) and worsening sense of taste (16.0 %). The overall OHIP-14 mean score was 13.3. Significantly worse OHIP-14 scores were observed for females (β = 12.85, p = 0.01), chemotherapy recipients (β = 6.60, p = 0.02), and past smokers (β = 5.25, p = 0.04). Better OHIP-14 scores (better oral QoL) were observed in patients with distant cancer stage (β = −7.66, p = 0.01), higher income (β = −2.50, p = 0.05), and older age at cancer diagnosis (β = −0.35, p = 0.03). ConclusionThe oral health-related quality of life scores observed in this pilot study suggest a need for improvement in patient symptom management over time.

Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivors: A 3-Year Prospective Study.

(1) Background: This prospective study aimed to assess the impact on quality of life (QoL) from pretreatment to 3 years after treatment in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) survivors. (2) Methods: QoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 scales before treatment and in the first and third years. (3) Results: Of 72 patients, 51 completed all questionnaires over 3 years. A variable deterioration of QoL scores was detected before treatment. Most items worsened significantly after treatment and during the first year and improved in the third year. Advanced-stage cancer and definitive chemoradiotherapy treatment showed the worst scores. At 3 years, patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy/chemotherapy had significantly better scores on global QoL and emotional functioning compared to those treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy, who also reported problems with sticky salivation and dry mouth. Patients treated with an open surgical approach showed significantly greater deterioration in physical and role functioning compared to transoral surgery. (4) Conclusions: This long-term prospective study is the first in Spain to use EORCT scales in a homogeneous group of OPC survivors. QoL was generally good, although patients needed a long period of time to recover from both cancer and side effects of treatment. Advanced-stage cancer and definitive chemoradiotherapy showed the worst scores.

Epidemiological trends and survival of oropharyngeal cancer in a high HPV-prevalent area: A Danish population-based study from 2000 to 2020.

Denmark, alongside other Scandinavian countries, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, has high prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Our oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) database includes all diagnosed cases in Eastern Denmark during a period of more than two decades. We investigated the incidence, survival, and recurrence of patients with OPSCC with combined p16- and HPV testing covering a consecutive 21-year period. Age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR) per 100,000, survival models, and Cox proportional-hazards model were employed. Two thousand eight hundred thirty-four patients were included (57.5% HPV positive (HPV+)/p16 positive (p16+), 33.7% HPV negative (HPV-)/p16 negative (p16-), 4% HPV+/p16-, and 4.8% HPV-/p16+). The AAIR for all patients increased from 1.8 to 5.1 per 100,000 from 2000 to 2020 linked to an increasing AAIR of HPV+/p16+ OPSCCs from 0.9 to 3.5 per 100,000 from 2000 to 2020. The AAIR for the HPV-/p16- OPSCCs decreased from 1.6 to 1.4 from 2017 to 2020. HPV+/p16+ OPSCCs had a higher 5-year overall survival (OS) of 79.2% compared to the other subgroups (HPV+/p16- OS: 50.4%; HPV-/p16+ OS: 49.4%; HPV-/p16- OS: 35.1%). The AAIR of the total OPSCC group increased from year 2000 to 2020, driven by a rise in the HPV+/p16+ group. A decreasing incidence rate was observed for the HPV-/p16- OPSCCs from 2017 to 2020. The OS for HPV+/p16+ OPSCCs was significantly higher compared to all other HPV/p16 subgroups. Therefore, we recommend testing for combined HPV and p16 status in patients with OPSCC when selecting patients for clinical trials, especially in case of de-escalating/escalating.

“Why am I still suffering?”: Experience of long-term fatigue and neurocognitive changes in oropharyngeal cancer survivors following (chemo)radiotherapy

BackgroundLate effects of cancer treatment, such as neurocognitive deficits and fatigue, can be debilitating. Other than head and neck–specific functional deficits such as impairments in swallowing and speech, little is known about survivorship after oropharyngeal cancer. This study examines the lived experience of fatigue and neurocognitive deficits in survivors of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer and impact on their daily lives. MethodsThis work is part of the multicentre mixed method ROC-oN study (Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer and impact on Neurocognition), evaluating fatigue and neurocognitive function in patients following radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer and impact on quality of life. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in adults treated with radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma >/=24 months from completing treatment. Reflexive thematic analysis performed. Results21 interviews (11 men and 10 women; median age 58 years and median time post-treatment 5 years) were conducted and analysed, yielding six themes: (1) unexpected burden of fatigue, (2) noticing changes in neurocognitive function, (3) the new normal, (4) navigating changes, (5)insufficient awareness and (6)required support. Participants described fatigue that persisted beyond the acute post-treatment period and changes in neurocognitive abilities across several domains. Paid and unpaid work, emotions and mood were impacted. Participants described navigating the new normal by adopting self-management strategies and accepting external support. They reported lack of recognition of these late effects, being poorly informed and being unprepared. Follow-up services were thought to be inadequate. ConclusionsFatigue and neurocognitive impairment were frequently experienced by survivors of oropharyngeal cancer, at least two years after treatment. Patients felt ill-prepared for these late sequelae, highlighting opportunities for improvement of patient information and support services.

Treatment Complications Associated With Hospital Admission in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.

Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivorship is a nursing priority because patients are living longer while significant short-term and long-term treatment complications that require nursing care are increasing. Hospital readmission is costly and reflects the quality of care patients receive. This secondary analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of treatment complications resulting in hospital admissions among persons with OPC and examine the relationship between treatment complications resulting in hospital admission among persons with OPC and all other persons with head and neck cancer. Using the National Inpatient Survey 2008-2019 database, we identified persons with relevant head and neck cancer diagnoses using specific International Classification of Disease ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Complications were operationalized by diagnosis-related codes; persons with codes for major elective surgery were excluded as our focus was posttreatment symptoms requiring hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize persons with OPC hospitalized between 2008 and 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to assess complications using crude comparisons. The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was used for controlling for comorbidities. The final analysis samples included 751,533: 164,770 persons with OPC and 586,763 with other head and cancers. The most prevalent diagnoses observed in those with OPC were esophagitis, nutrition disorder, hematological disorder, and renal failure; the least common diagnoses were sepsis, respiratory tract infection, and pneumonia. Binary regression revealed that persons with OPC experienced significantly more esophagitis, nutrition disorders, hematological disorders, and renal failure compared to persons with other head and neck cancers. Treatment of survivors of OPC requires more intensive monitoring for early symptoms associated with treatment, including esophagitis, nutrition disorders, bleeding disorders, and renal failure, than persons with other head and neck cancers. Monitoring laboratory values and clinical manifestations of these conditions is imperative. Nurses may encounter persons with OPC in emergency departments, outpatient radiology, or inpatient general medicine floors to manage swallowing difficulties, dehydration, malnutrition, and bleeding. Delayed or ineffective treatment of these conditions contributes to readmission, financial burden, and impairment of patient's quality of life. Future research should investigate the relationship between targeted treatment for expected complications and readmission rates in persons with OPC.

Are Different Modes of Weight Loss Associated with Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer?

Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) often lose weight during radical radiotherapy (RT). Nutritional intervention is required in case of severe weight loss. However, weight loss does not provide full insight into body composition changes. Muscle mass is emerging as an important prognostic factor in cancer patients. We employed on-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans to monitor muscle mass and weight loss under the hypothesis that different modes of weight loss exist and may impact overall survival (OS). A retrospective analysis of 197 OPSCC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant (chemo)RT. Weekly weight measurements & CBCTs were collected. Patients were included if at least two time-points were available and the interval between the first and last was between 15-50 days. CBCTs were normalized to account for calibration differences between treatment machines. An in-house deep-learning model automatically segmented the skeletal muscle compartment at C3 on all CBCTs. Segmentations were visually checked and failures removed. Skeletal muscle volume (SMV, in mm3) was extracted after thresholding for intra-muscular fat. Relative changes in weight & SMV were then calculated. Linear models were fitted to each trajectory for every patient and slopes were estimated. The following weight & SMV categories were defined to generate equal groups: lost (more than 0.4 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean (M)), maintained (within +/- 0.4 SDs of M) or gained (more than 0.4 SDs above the M). Table 1 highlights the nine modes of body composition change. The prognostic value of these was investigated in multivariable Cox models accounting for age, sex, disease stage, oropharynx subsite, smoking status, performance status (PS), tumor p16 status, baseline weight & SMV, and treatment prescribed. The primary endpoint was OS. Mean weight & SMV changes during treatment were -0.047±0.001% & -0.044±0.019% per day. In multivariable analysis, gaining weight & losing SMV was identified as a significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.01, hazard ratio [95% CI]: 4.59 [1.40-15.10]). In this sub-group, mean weight & SMV change were +0.054±0.008% & -0.396±0.030% per day. PS>2 (p<0.001) & lower baseline weight (p = 0.02) were also significantly associated with OS. Patients losing substantial SMV but mildly gaining weight have significantly worse OS than others. This suggests there exists a group of patients where nutritional support is needed, but not offered because they maintain weight during treatment. Although our results need validation, continual monitoring of muscle condition during RT would allow these patients to be identified and promptly targeted for nutritional support.

Prevalence and correlates of fear of recurrence among oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors.

Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a prevalent and difficult experience among cancer patients. Most research has focused on FoR among breast cancer patients, with less attention paid to characterizing levels and correlates of FoR among oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors. The purpose was to characterize FoR with a measure assessing both global fears and the nature of specific worries as well as evaluate the role of sociodemographic and clinical factors, survivorship care transition practices, lifestyle factors, and depressive symptoms in FoR. Three hundred eighty-nine oral and oropharyngeal survivors recruited from two cancer registries completed a survey assessing demographics, cancer treatment, symptoms, alcohol and tobacco use, survivorship care practices, depression, and FoR. Forty percent reported elevated global FoR, with similar percentages for death (46%) and health worries (40.3%). Younger, female survivors and survivors experiencing more physical and depressive symptoms reported more global fears and specific fears about the impact of recurrence on roles, health, and identity, and fears about death. Depression accounted for a large percent of the variance. Lower income was associated with more role and identity/sexuality worries, and financial hardship was associated with more role worries. FoR is a relatively common experience for oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Many of its correlates are modifiable factors that could be addressed with multifocal, tailored survivorship care interventions. Assessing and addressing depressive symptoms, financial concerns, expected physical symptoms in the first several years of survivorship may impact FoR among oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors.

Incidence, trends, and survival of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2006–2020

BackgroundAn increasing trend of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has been reported in several countries with different demographic characteristics, and often attributed to increases in human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The survival of patients with OPC has steadily improved, especially for those with positive HPV status. This study assessed the incidence, trends, and survival of OPC in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) by age at diagnosis, sex and ethnicity. MethodsThe study included all 2109 patients resident in NZ with a primary diagnosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from 2006 to 2020, identified from the National Cancer Registry. We assessed age-standardised incidence rate (ASR), annual percent change (APC) and overall and relative survival rates. ResultsThe average annual incidence of OPC was 2.2 per 100,000 population. There was a steady increase of 4.9% per year over 15 years. Although the incidence rates were higher in males over the study period, the overall rate of increase was similar in males (4.9%) and in females (4.3%). The incidence was highest in the 50–69-year group (8.8/100,000 population). This age group had an incidence that increased by 7.5% per year to 2018, and then declined. The main increase in rates was seen between the birth cohort of 1946–50 and that of 1956–60. The increase in incidence was seen in Māori and Pākehā/European populations, but no increase was seen in Pacific or Asian populations. The 5-year overall relative survival rate improved from 69% in 2006‐13 to 78% in 2014–20. Survival rates were lower in older patients, females, and Māori patients. ConclusionThis study confirmed a substantial increase in OPC incidence in NZ, with some evidence to suggest a recent slowing in this increase. Māori and Pākehā/European had the highest incidence, while Pacific and Asian populations showed the lowest rates and no increase over the study period. Survival rates have improved over time, but remained lower in some demographic groups.

Dysphagia and shortness-of-breath as markers for treatment failure and survival in oropharyngeal cancer after radiation

BackgroundPost-treatment symptoms are a focal point of follow-up visits for head and neck cancer patients. While symptoms such as dysphagia and shortness-of-breath early after treatment may motivate additional work up, their precise association with disease control and survival outcomes is not well established. MethodsThis prospective data cohort study of 470 oropharyngeal cancer patients analyzed patient-reported swallowing, choking and shortness-of-breath symptoms at 3-to-6 months following radiotherapy to evaluate their association with overall survival and disease control. Associations between the presence of moderate-to-severe swallowing, choking and mild-to-severe shortness-of-breath and treatment outcomes were analyzed via Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier. The main outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were local, regional, and distant disease control. ResultsThe majority of patients (91.3%) were HPV-positive. Median follow-up time was 31.7 months (IQR: 21.9–42.1). Univariable analysis showed significant associations between OS and all three symptoms of swallowing, choking, and shortness-of-breath. A composite variable integrating scores of all three symptoms was significantly associated with OS on multivariable Cox regression (p = 0.0018). Additionally, this composite symptom score showed the best predictive value for OS (c-index = 0.75). Multivariable analysis also revealed that the composite score was significantly associated with local (p = 0.044) and distant (p = 0.035) recurrence/progression. Notably, the same significant associations with OS were seen for HPV-positive only subset analysis (p < 0.01 for all symptoms). ConclusionsQuantitative patient-reported measures of dysphagia and shortness-of-breath 3-to-6 months post-treatment are significant predictors of OS and disease recurrence/progression in OPC patients and in HPV-positive OPC only.

Optimized decision support for selection of transoral robotic surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy based on posttreatment swallowing toxicity.

A primary goal in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) survivors is to optimize swallowing function. However, the uncertainty in the outcomes of TORS including postoperative residual positive margin (PM) and extranodal extension (ENE), may necessitate adjuvant therapy, which may cause significant swallowing toxicity to survivors. A secondary analysis was performed on a prospective registry data with low- to intermediate-risk human papillomavirus-related OPSCC possibly resectable by TORS. Decision trees were developed to model the uncertainties in TORS compared with definitive radiation therapy (RT) and chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Swallowing toxicities were measured by Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) instruments. The likelihoods of PM/ENE were varied to determine the thresholds within which each therapy remains optimal. Compared with RT, TORS resulted in inferior swallowing function for moderate likelihoods of PM/ENE (>60% in short term for all instruments, >75% in long term for DIGEST and MDASI) leaving RT as the optimal treatment. Compared with CRT, TORS remained the optimal therapy based on MDADI and MDASI but showed inferior swallowing outcomes based on DIGEST for moderate-to-high likelihoods of PM/ENE (>75% for short-term and >40% for long-term outcomes). In the absence of reliable estimation of postoperative PM/ENE concurrent with significant postoperative PM, the overall toxicity level in OPSCC patients undergoing TORS with adjuvant therapy may become more severe compared with patients receiving nonsurgical treatments thus advocating definitive (C)RT protocols.

Self-efficacy in managing post-treatment care among oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors.

Physical and psychosocial effects of oral cancer result in long-term self-management needs. Little attention has been paid to survivors' self-efficacy in managing their care. Study goals were to characterise self-care self-efficacy and evaluate socio-demographics, disease, attitudinal factors and psychological correlates of self-efficacy and engagement in head and neck self-exams. Two hundred thirty-two oral cancer survivors completed measures of socio-demographics, self-care self-efficacy, head and neck self-exams and attitudinal and psychological measures. Descriptive statistics characterised self-efficacy. Hierarchical regressions evaluated predictors of self-efficacy. Survivors felt moderately confident in the ability to manage self-care (M = 4.04, SD = 0.75). Survivors with more comorbidities (β = -0.125), less preparedness (β=0.241), greater information (β = -0.191), greater support needs (β = -0.224) and higher depression (β = -0.291) reported significantly lower self-efficacy. Head and neck self-exam engagement (44% past month) was relatively low. Higher preparedness (OR = 2.075) and self-exam self-efficacy (OR = 2.606) were associated with more engagement in self-exams. Many survivors report low confidence in their ability to engage in important self-care practices. Addressing unmet information and support needs, reducing depressive symptoms and providing skill training and support may boost confidence in managing self-care and optimise regular self-exams.

Association of post-treatment longitudinal symptom severity clusters with subsequent survival in oropharyngeal cancer.

Patients with cancer often experience multiple symptoms concurrently. We identified patient clusters based on longitudinal symptom severity trajectories in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and evaluated the potential clinical utility of this approach. A retrospective OPC patient cluster analysis using 6months of symptom severity data from radiotherapy initiation. The clinico-demographic characteristics and overall survival of patients were compared between clusters. We identified four clusters of patients differing in longitudinal symptom severity. Cluster A (n=168) included patients with the mildest longitudinal symptoms, cluster B (n=59) and cluster C (n=63) were intermediate, and cluster D (n=30) included patients with the worst symptoms. The clusters differed in their HPV status, ECOG performance status, smoking history, drinking history, treatment modality, and 5-year survival. These clusters separated symptom severity trajectories more distinctly than individual clinico-demographic characteristics. Early symptom severity trajectory clustering revealed distinct patient clusters that were prognostic of overall survival.

Association of hearing loss and tinnitus symptoms with health-related quality of life among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors.

This study investigated the association of hearing loss and tinnitus with overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors. This study included OPC survivors treated between 2000 and 2013 and surveyed from September 2015 to July 2016. Hearing loss and tinnitus were measured by asking survivors to rate their "difficulty with hearing loss and/or ringing in the ears" from 0 (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Hearing loss and tinnitus scores were categorized as follows: 0 for none, 1-4 for mild, and 5-10 for moderate to severe. The primary outcome was the mean score of MD nderson Symptom Inventory Head & Neck module interference component as a HRQoL surrogate dichotomized as follows: 0 to 4 for none to mild and 5 to 10 for moderate to severe interference. Among 880 OPC survivors, 35.6% (314), reported none, 39.3% (347) reported mild, and 25.1% (221) reported moderate to severe hearing loss and tinnitus. On multivariable analysis, mild (OR, 5.83; 95% CI; 1.48-22.88; p=0.012) and moderate (OR, 30.01; 95% CI; 7.96-113.10; p < 0.001) hearing loss and tinnitus were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe symptom interference scores in comparison to no hearing loss and tinnitus. This association of hearing dysfunction was consistent with all domains of HRQoL. Our findings provide preliminary evidence to support the need for continued audiological evaluations and surveillance to detect hearing dysfunction, to allow for early management and to alleviate the long-term impact on QoL.

Development of a prognostic model of overall survival in oropharyngeal cancer from real-world data: PRO.M.E.THE.O.

SUMMARYObjectiveThe PRO.M.E.THE.O. study (PredictiOn Models in Ent cancer for anti-EGFR based THErapy Optimization) aimed to develop a predictive model (PM) of overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (LAOC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and cetuximab (Cet) from an Italian dataset.MethodsWe enrolled patients with LAOC from 6 centres treated with RT-Cet. Clinical and treatment variables were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training (TS) (80%) and validation (VS) (20%) sets. A binary logistic regression model was used on the TS with stepwise feature selection and then on VS. Timepoints of 2, 3 and 5 years were considered. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic of 2, 3 and 5 year and confusion matrix statistics at 5-threshold were used as performance criteria.ResultsOverall, 218 patients were enrolled and 174 (79.8%) were analysed. Age at diagnosis, gender, ECOG performance, clinical stage, dose to high-risk volume, overall treatment time and day of RT interruption were considered in the final PMs. The PMs were developed and represented by nomograms with AUC of 0.75, 0.73 and 0.73 for TS and 0.713, 0.713, 0.775 for VS at 2, 3 and 5 years, respectively.ConclusionsPRO.M.E.THE.O. allows the creation of a PM for OS in patients with LAOC treated with RT-Cet.

Genetic susceptibility to patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors

Genetic susceptibility for xerostomia, a common sequela of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer, is unknown. Therefore, to identify genetic variants associated with moderate to severe xerostomia, we conducted a GWAS of 359 long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors using 579,956 autosomal SNPs. Patient-reported cancer treatment-related xerostomia was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Patient response was dichotomized as moderate to severe or none to mild symptoms. In our study, 39.2% of OPC survivors reported moderate to severe xerostomia. Our GWAS identified eight SNPs suggestively associated with higher risk of moderate to severe xerostomia in six genomic regions (2p13.3, rs6546481, Minor Allele (MA) = A, ANTXR1, P = 4.3 × 10–7; 5p13.2–p13.1, rs16903936, MA = G, EGFLAM, P = 5.1 × 10–6; 4q21.1, rs10518156, MA = G, SHROOM3, P = 7.1 × 10–6; 19q13.42, rs11882068, MA = G, NLRP9, P = 1.7 × 10–5; 12q24.33, rs4760542, MA = G, GLT1D1, P = 1.8 × 10–5; and 3q27.3, rs11714564, MA = G, RTP1, P = 2.9 × 10–5. Seven SNPs were associated with lower risk of moderate to severe xerostomia, of which only one mapped to specific genomic region (15q21.3, rs4776140, MA = G, LOC105370826, a ncRNA class RNA gene, P = 1.5 × 10–5). Although our small exploratory study did not reach genome-wide statistical significance, our study provides, for the first time, preliminary evidence of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia.

Rising incidence of HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer in Taiwan between 1999 and 2014 where betel nut chewing is common

BackgroundThe incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is rising but HPV negative OPC is decreasing in Western countries. In Taiwan, the incidence of HPV negative OPC is common but the incidence of HPV positive OPC remains unknown. The objective of this study is to estimate the incidence trend and the survival of HPV positive OPC in Taiwan.MethodsBetween 1999 and 2014, primary tumor tissues from 425 incident OPCs were obtained from 5 medical centers in Taiwan. 408 OPCs were evaluated by the EasyChip HPV genotyping (King-Car, I-Lan, Taiwan) and 369 OPCs by p16 staining. The clinical data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records.ResultsIn our study, 29% of OPCs were HPV positive. The percentage of HPV positive OPC was stable from 1999 to 2014 (25% (1999–2002), 30% (2003–2006), 30% (2007–2010), 29% (2011–2014)). The estimated crude incidence rate of HPV positive OPC increased significantly from 0.62 (1999–2002), 1.06 (2003–2006), 1.52 (2007–2010) to 1.74 (2011–2014) per 100,000 person-year. The sensitivity and specificity of p16 staining for positive HPV infection were 92% and 91%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with HPV positive OPC and with HPV negative OPC were 67.8% and 49.0%, respectively (HR = 0.52 (0.35–0.76), p = 0.0005). Patients with HPV positive OPC but no betel nut/cigarette exposure had the best overall survival (5-year: 88.2%, p < 0.0001). Patients with HPV negative OPC and betel nut/cigarette exposure had the worst overall survival (5-year: 46.6%, p < 0.0001). Patients with HPV positive OPC but also with betel nut/cigarette exposure had poorer 5-year overall survival (48.3%, p < 0.01).ConclusionThe incidence of HPV positive OPC is increasing along with HPV negative OPC, which leads to stably low percentage of HPV positive OPC in Taiwan. HPV positive OPC may become an important head and neck cancer when the incidence of HPV negative OPC declines in the near future. P16 is a useful surrogate marker for HPV infection in OPC and a good prognostic indicator for treatment outcome of OPC. Patients with HPV positive OPC but no betel nut/cigarette exposure has an excellent prognosis. Betel nut/cigarette exposure significantly worsens the prognosis of HPV positive OPC.

The influence of radiation dose on taste impairment in a prospective observational study cohort of oropharyngeal cancer patients

Background To analyze the influence of radiation dose on late radiation-associated taste impairment in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa as organ at risk. Material and methods This study is part of an ongoing, prospective observational study. Cancer-free OPC survivors with at least 24 months from IMRT were included in this analysis. Scores for taste impairment and dry mouth were extracted from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN) with scores of ≥5 considered as moderate-to-severe symptoms. The mean dose, minimum and maximum dose to the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa, the ipsi- and contralateral parotid and submandibular glands were extracted and analyzed for correlation with moderate-to-severe taste impairment. Results One hundred sixteen T1–4 OPC patients were included (81% males, median age: 55). The primary tumor was in the tonsil in 92 cases (79%) and in the base of tongue in 21 cases (18%). Patients were treated with 64.2–72.0 Gy; 37 patients (32%) received concurrent chemotherapy and 22 (19%) concurrent targeted therapy. After a median of 58 months from RT (IQR: 43–68) 38 patients (33%) suffered from moderate-to-severe long-term radiation-associated taste impairment. No dose volume parameter of the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa and the salivary glands was significantly associated with moderate-to-severe taste impairment for the whole patient cohort. For patients without concurrent chemotherapy, the minimum and mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland, and the maximum dose to the submandibular gland was significantly associated with late taste impairment (all p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between taste impairment and dry mouth (p < 0.001). Conclusion The dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland seems to play an important role in the development of late taste impairment. The influence of dose to the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa remains unclear and needs further investigation.

Impact of specific high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes on survival in oropharyngeal cancer.

The increases observed in incidence and survival of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have been attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, but the survival-impact of specific genotypes is poorly understood. We investigated the potential influence of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV-positive (HPV+) OPSCC. All patients with HPV+/p16+ OPSCC and available genotype data within the period 2011 to 2017 in Eastern Denmark were included. Descriptive statistics on clinical and tumor data, as well as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with Cox hazard models and Kaplan-Meier plots were performed. Overall, 769 HPV+/p16+ OPSCC patients were included of which genotype HPV16 accounted for 86% (n=662). Compared to high-risk non-HPV16 genotypes (HR non-HPV16), HPV16 patients were younger at diagnosis (median years, 60 vs 64), had a higher male to female ratio (3.7:1 vs 2.1:1), and lower performance scores of ≤1 (90%, n=559, vs 81%, n=74). Regarding 5-year OS and RFS, no difference was observed between HPV16 and HR non-HPV16 patients. Subgrouping the HR non-HPV16 group into HPV33 (n=57), HPV35 (n=26) and "other genotypes" (n=24) a significantly worse OS in the "other genotypes" group (hazard rate: 2.33, P=.027) was shown. With similar survival results between HPV16 and non-HPV16 genotypes, genotyping in OPSCC is interesting from an epidemiological point of view as well as in vaccination programs, but not a necessary addition in prognostication of HPV+/p16+ OPSCC.

Sub-Acute Post-Treatment Dysphagia and Shortness of Breath Symptoms Associate With Worse Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer

Post-treatment symptoms are a focal point of follow-up visits for head and neck cancer patients. While symptoms such as dysphagia and shortness of breath may empirically guide earlier detection of disease recurrence, their association with patient outcomes is less well studied, especially for HPV-positive disease. This study aimed to investigate the association between patient reported dysphagia and shortness of breath at 3-to-6 months following radiotherapy (RT) and overall survival (OS).Data were collected from oropharyngeal cancer patients that received RT with curative intent from 2015-2019. Included patients had self-reported scores for shortness of breath, choking/coughing ("choke"), and difficulty swallowing/chewing ("swallow"), which were surveyed via the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN) questionnaire at 3-to-6 months after RT. Symptom severity was scored from 0-10. Significant predictors of OS were analyzed via Cox regression. Symptom scores were also discretized for Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, with more severe symptoms being 6+ for "swallow" and "choke" and 2+ for shortness of breath.Symptom scores were collected at 3-to-6 months from 470 patients. The majority (91.3%) were HPV-positive. Median follow-up time was 31.7 months (IQR: 21.9-42.1). Univariable Cox regression (Table 1) showed significant associations between OS and MDASI scores for shortness of breath, "choke," and "swallow." Furthermore, a composite variable integrating scores of all three symptoms had the best predictive value for OS (c-index = 0.748). Symptom severity stratified patients based on OS for all three symptoms, with more severe symptoms predicting worse OS on KM analysis (P < 0.001 for all symptoms). On subset analysis more severe symptoms remained significantly associated with worse OS among HPV-positive patients (P < 0.01 for all symptoms).Quantitative early patient-reported measures of dysphagia and shortness of breath are significant predictors of OS in head and neck cancer, in particular for HPV-positive disease. Integrating quantitative symptom surveys into post-treatment surveillance may be beneficial for individualizing follow-up strategies.

Prospective Validation of the Use It or Lose It Paradigm: Secondary Analysis of Sub-Acute Dietary Outcomes by Eat and Exercise Status During Oropharyngeal Radiotherapy

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> The investigators' 2013 use it or lose it study suggested functional benefit of two pharyngeal activities during head and neck radiotherapy (RT) – maintenance of oral intake (EAT) and swallowing exercise. EAT and EXERCISE independently associated with better odds of resuming a regular diet in long term survivorship and shorter duration of gastrostomy (FT) dependence. The prior work is limited by the retrospective nature of the dataset and historically far higher FT utilization. Our aim was to validate the previous work in a contemporary cohort of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors treated with RT using prospectively acquired validated outcome measures. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Endpoints included subacute diet after RT per the performance status scale for head and neck cancer (PSS-HN; solid food diet coded as ≥60 and no FT) and length of FT-dependence in days. Primary independent variables included oral intake (PO) at the end of RT (nothing per oral/NPO; partial PO; full PO) and swallow exercise adherence. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression models were analyzed adjusting for tumor location, baseline diet, chemotherapy and N and T stage. <h3>Results</h3> Analysis included 595 patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT; 19% 111) /chemoradiation (CRT; 73% 434) or primary TORS + CRT (8% 50) for OPC (base of tongue/glossopharyngeal sulcus [46% 276]; tonsil [44% 263]; other [9% 56]). At the end of RT 9% of patients were NPO (55), 19% partial PO (115), 71% full PO (425). Statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) covariates for EAT and/or EXERCISE included tumor location, chemotherapy, N and T stage. Fifty-seven percent of patients (340) reported adherence to swallow exercises. Overall, 66% (394) of patients returned to a solid diet by 3-6 months. In adjusted models, EAT and EXERCISE during RT were independently, significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.01) associated with sub-acute diet recovery and FT duration. Patients who maintained full PO during RT were 2.5 times more likely to eat a solid diet by 3-6 months (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3, 5) when compared to those who were NPO during treatment. Patients who exercised were 2.9 times more likely to return to a solid diet (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.8, 4.4) relative to those who did not. Thirty-eight percent of patients received a FT (231) and the median duration of tube dependence was 89 days (IQR: 28-142). EAT was independently associated with FT duration (<i>P</i> < 0.001, Coefficient, -123.6, 95% CI: -148.7, -98.4), while EXERCISE was not (<i>P</i> = .73). <h3>Conclusion</h3> These prospective registry data validate prior work that indicate independent benefit of EAT and swallowing EXERCISE adherence during RT on subacute functional outcomes. Patients who maintained full PO and/or exercise were more likely to eat solid foods by 3-6 months after treatment, while patients who EAT during treatment expectedly have the shortest feeding tube dependence.