Survival Benefit Of Surgical Resection Research Articles

Treatment outcomes of surgery and chemotherapy for pulmonary metastases from non-lung cancers: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The optimal treatment for pulmonary metastases has not been determined, and the survival benefit of surgical resection in selected patients remains controversial. The purpose of this retrospective study was to explore whether surgery can prolong survival in patients with pulmonary metastases compared with chemotherapy, and to analyze the factors that may affect the long-term survival of patients with pulmonary metastases. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with pulmonary metastases from June 2012 to June 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance factors that might affect survival between the two groups. The data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to compare the survival of the surgery group and the chemotherapy group. A total of 202 patients with pulmonary metastases were enrolled in the study, with 43 patients in the surgery group and 43 in the chemotherapy group after screening and PSM. After PSM, patients in the surgery group had better survival than those in the chemotherapy group, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 75.1% and 48.0%, respectively (P=0.017). Univariate analysis of the two groups of patients found that the treatment method, the number of metastases, and the total diameter of metastases were prognostic factors, but multivariate analysis did not find independent prognostic factors. In the surgical group, univariate analysis found that disease-free interval (DFI), the number of metastases, surgical methods, resection scope and surgical route were prognostic factors, and multivariate analysis showed that only DFI was an independent prognostic factor. In the chemotherapy group, DFI and the response of metastases to chemotherapy were found to be prognostic factors in univariate analysis, but no independent prognostic factors were found in multivariate analysis. Surgery does not provide a significant survival advantage. For patients undergoing surgery, longer DFI predicts better survival.

Evaluating surgical treatment options for small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the NCDB.

645 Background: The role of surgery for small (≤2 cm), nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) remains controversial due to the wide range of tumor aggressiveness. Consensus guidelines of the US, Europe, and Japan offer different recommendations for treatment of small NF-PNETs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the survival benefit of surgical resection for small NF-PNETs. Methods: Patients with NF-PNETs were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018. Small NF-PNETs were divided into two groups: group 1a (tumor ≤1 cm) and group 1b (tumor 1.1 – 2.0 cm). Cox regression models were used to compare the overall survival between resected and unresected small NF-PNETs patients. Interactions between preoperative factors and surgery were estimated using subgroup analyses. Results: We identified 1,278 patients in group 1a and 3,363 patients in group 1b. After adjusting for preoperative factors, surgery was associated with longer survival for patients in group 1b (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.80; P <0.001), but not for patients in group 1a (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41–1.11; P = 0.122). Interaction analysis found that age younger than 65 years, fewer comorbidities, treatment at academic institutions, distal pancreatic tumors, and clinical lymph node metastasis were factors associated with longer survival in group 1b by surgery. Conclusions: Findings from this large study support surgical resection for some patients with NF-PNETs (1.1 – 2.0 cm). This, of course, must be taken in context with the patient’s clinical situation. Based on data available for analysis in this study, resection for subcentimeter NF-PNETs does not appear to be of general benefit, but should also be investigated in the context of Ki-67 index.[Table: see text]

Optimizing Survival Benefit by Surgical Resection by the Seven-Eleven Criteria in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A/B Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria

Introduction: Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is in debate. We aimed to identify candidates for surgical resection (SR) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with survival benefit. Methods: Patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria at the National Taiwan University Hospital during 2005 and 2019 were screened, and those who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or SR were consecutively included. The tumor burden was classified by the seven-eleven criteria into low (≤7), intermediate (7–11), or high (>11). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for outcome prediction. Results: Overall, 474 patients who received SR (n = 247) and TACE (n = 227) were enrolled. Patients who underwent SR were significantly younger with better liver reserve. There were 76 (31%) and 129 (57%) deaths in the SR and TACE groups after a median follow-up of 3.9 and 2.1 years, respectively. The seven-eleven criteria could distinguish median overall survival (OS) among low (n = 149), intermediate (n = 203), and high (n = 122) tumor burden groups (7.7 vs. 6.9 vs. 2.8 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients receiving SR had a significantly higher median OS compared with TACE in those with intermediate (8.2 vs. 2.6 years, p < 0.001) and high (5.6 vs. 1.5 years, p = 0.001) tumor burden. After adjustment for age, sex, and liver reserve, SR was predictive for better OS in intermediate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27–0.75) and high tumor burden groups (aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32–0.92). The survival benefit of SR especially confines to patients within 3 tumors. Conclusions: In patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with tumor burden beyond the up-to-7 criteria but within 3 tumors, SR has better OS than TACE and should be considered in resectable patients.

Survival benefit of surgical resection for stage IV gastric cancer: A SEER-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major malignancy worldwide, and its incidence and mortality rate are increasing year by year. Clinical guidelines mainly use palliative drug combination therapy for stage IV gastric cancer. In accordance with some small sample studies, surgery can prolong survival. There is no uniform treatment plan for stage IV gastric cancer. This study focused on collecting evidence of the survival benefit of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) for patients with stage IV gastric cancer by analyzing data from a large sample. Data on patients with stage IV gastric cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 was extracted and divided into CDS and no-CDS groups using the large dataset in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. With bias between the two groups minimized by propensity score matching (PSM), the prognostic role of CDS was studied by the Cox proportional risk model and Kaplan-Meier. A total of 6,284 patients with stage IV gastric cancer were included, including 514 patients with CDS who were matched with no-CDS patients according to propensity score (1:1), resulting in the inclusion of 432 patients each in the CDS and no-CDS groups. The results showed that CDS appeared to prolong the median survival time for stage IV gastric cancer (from 6 months to 10 months). Multifactorial analysis showed that poorly differentiated tumors (grades III-IV) significantly affected patient survival, and chemotherapy was a protective prognostic factor. The findings support that CDS can provide a survival benefit for stage IV gastric cancer. However, a combination of age, underlying physical status, tumor histology, and metastatic status should be considered when making decisions about CDS, which will aid in clinical decision-making.

Surgical resection and survival outcomes in metastatic young adult colorectal cancer patients.

BackgroundThe incidence of colorectal cancer in adults younger than age 50 has increased with rates expected to continue to increase over the next decade. The objective of this study is to examine the survival benefit of surgical resection (primary and/or metastatic) versus palliative therapy in this patient population.MethodsWe identified 6708 young adults aged 18–45 years diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from 2004 to 2015 from the SEER database. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimation, log rank test, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsSixty‐three percent of patients in our study underwent primary tumor resection (PTR), with 40% undergoing PTR alone and 23% undergoing both resection of primary disease and metastasectomy. The median OS for patients who underwent both PTR and metastasectomy was 36 months, compared to 13 months for those who did not receive any surgical intervention. The multivariate analysis showed significant OS benefit of receiving both PTR and metastasectomy (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.31–0.37, p < 0.001) compared to palliative therapy. Undergoing PTR only and metastasectomy only were also associated with improved OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43–0.49, p < 0.001 and HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55–0.76, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionThis is the largest observational study to evaluate survival outcomes in young‐onset mCRC patients and the role of surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site. Our study provides evidence of statistically significant increase in OS for young mCRC patients who undergo surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site.

Treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation versus liver transplantation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a population-based study.

Restricted mean survival time (RMST) has been increasingly used to assess the treatment effect. We aimed to evaluate a treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus liver transplantation (LT) and surgical resection (SR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria by using an adjusted RMST. A total of 7,218 HCC patients (RFA, 3,327; LT, 2,332; SR 1,523) within Milan criteria were eligible for this retrospectively study. The RMST using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment were applied to estimate the treatment effect between RFA and LT, RFA, and SR groups. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year IPTW-adjusted difference in RMST of OS for LT over RFA were + 4.5, + 12.4, and + 36.3 months, respectively. For SR versus RFA group, the survival benefit was + 2.3, + 6.1, and + 15.8 months at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. But the incremental survival benefit of SR over RFA was only half than that of LT over RFA. In the subgroup of solitary tumor ≤ 2 cm, the adjusted RMST of RFA versus SR was comparable with no statistical differences. Beyond that, in comparison with RFA, a notably greater efficacy of LT and SR was consistently across all subgroups with solitary HCC > 2.0 cm, AFP positive or negative, and fibrosis score 0-4 or 5-6. RMST provides a measure of absolute survival benefit at a specific time point. Using IPTW-adjusted RMST, we showed that the incremental survival benefit of SR over RFA was about half than that of LT over RFA. • The restricted mean survival time offers an intuitive, clinically meaningful interpretation to quantify the treatment effect than the hazard ratio. • Liver transplantation and surgical resection provided better overall survival compared to radiofrequency ablation for HCC patients within Milan criteria, but RFA and SR provide equivalent long-term overall survival for solitary HCC ≤ 2 cm. • The incremental survival benefit of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation was only half than that of liver transplantation over radiofrequency ablation.

Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Aim: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for patients with small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Methods: Patients with small (≤5 cm) and early-stage ICC were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between the SR and RFA patients were evaluated. The results were verified using an inverse probability-weighting model (IPTW).Results: In total, 184 patients with small T1 stage ICC that received RFA or SR treatment were identified. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.4, 73.3, and 61.5% for patients who underwent SR, respectively, and 89.9, 42.4, and 23.9%, respectively, for patients who received RFA. CSS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.5, 73.8, and 66.1%, respectively, for the SR group and 93.5, 53.4, and 30.0%, respectively, for the RFA group. The OS and CSS rates were evaluated to be significantly better in the SR group than in the RFA group after the multivariate Cox regression and IPTW analysis. Subsequently, the survival benefit of SR was also observed in the subgroup of patients with <4.5 or <4 cm early-stage ICC when compared with RFA.Conclusion: Our results indicated that the SR provided a significantly better prognosis than RFA in patients with small and early-stage ICC. SR as the first-line treatment of primary early-stage ICC is still recommended. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to compare these modalities in the treatment of ICC.

Survival benefit of surgical resection after first-line triplet chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundSurgical resection of metastatic disease in patients with initially non-resectable colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved overall survival. Intensified chemotherapy regimens have increased the probability of converting unresectable metastasis to resectable. Here, we report the result of combining intensive chemotherapy (triplet) and surgical resection of metastatic lesions in patients with metastatic CRC.Patients and methodsPatients with unresectable metastatic CRC were enrolled in phase I/II trial of triplet chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Patients were given 5–8 cycles induction chemotherapy of the above regimen followed by maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. All patients were assessed at a multidisciplinary conference for possible surgical resection of their metastatic disease at the time of inclusion in the trial and 2 monthly intervals thereafter.Patients who underwent R0 resection of their metastatic disease received adjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine to complete a total of 6 months of chemotherapy.ResultsFifty-three patients were enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range 23–74), 29 (55%) were males, ECOG PS 0-1 was 13 (66%), 11 (42%) had a right-sided tumor, 29 (55%) had resection of their primary tumor, 22 (42%) had a single metastatic site, and 8 (15.1%) had a liver-limited disease.Thirteen patients (24.5%) underwent surgical resection of residual metastatic disease +/− the primary tumor with 10 (18.9%) of them were R0.The surgical group had a higher incidence of males compared to the non-surgical group (69.3% vs 47.2%, p = 0.2), equal performance status, lower median number of metastatic sites (1 vs 2, p = 0.09), higher mutant Kras (53.8% vs 34.2%, p = 0.3), and higher response rate (84.6% vs 56.2%, p = 0.3).With a median follow-up duration of 89 months, the median PFS for the whole group was 16.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1–20] and the median OS was 28.2 months (95% CI 22.5–53.3).The median PFS for the surgery group was 18.9 months (95% CI 12.6–not reached) compared to 9.6 months (95% CI 7.0–18.3) for the non-surgical group, log-rank p = 0.0165. The median OS for both groups was not reached (95% CI 53.3–not reached) and 23.2 months (95% CI 17.0–28.4) respectively, log-rank p = 0.0006. Five-year PFS and OS for the surgery group were 46.2% and 67.6% respectively.ConclusionsPatients with unresectable metastatic CRC and fit for triplet chemotherapy should have the benefit of combining this intensified regimen and surgical resection of their metastatic disease if possible.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01311050, registered March 6, 2011, retrospectively registered.

P-30 Survival benefit of surgical resection after first-line triplet chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

Surgical resection of metastatic disease in patients with initially non-resectable colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved overall survival. Intensified chemotherapy regimens have increased the probability of converting unresectable metastasis to resectable. Here, we report the result of combining intensive chemotherapy (triplet) and surgical resection of metastatic lesions in patients with metastatic CRC.

Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Resection of Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer.

Brain metastases from breast cancer have poor prognosis and are a challenge to treat. Multiple treatment options are available. Descriptive and prognostic data on breast cancer brain metastases is limited. This study analyzed clinical data of patients who underwent surgical resection of one or more brain metastases. Histological and clinical characteristics, as well as treatment modalities, were analyzed. Initial tumor stage or grade was found not to correlate with the median time to developing brain metastases or survival. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive status was not associated with shorter median time to developing brain metastases. No correlation was found between the number of brain metastases and patient outcome. Results confirm the survival benefit of surgical resection with or without irradiation. Data showed that patients with HER2-positive and those with triple-negative breast cancer develop brain metastases at lower stages but not earlier after diagnosis, and survival is mostly dependent on treatment modality rather than histological subtype.

In-hospital Mortality after Surgical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.

Background: Survival benefit of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) has been approved recently. However, risk factors for in-hospital mortality in these patients remain unclear. We aimed to determine risk factors and reduce the mortality of these patients.Methods: We analyzed data for 521 of all 1531 HCC patients with PVTT underwent surgery. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality after surgical resection. Univariate and Multivariate cox-regression were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The methods of Kaplan-Meier, bootstrap and ten-fold-cross validation were applied to validate the risk factors.Results: 521 of 1531 patients in 2004-2012 occurred for the diagnosis of HCC associated with PVTT and underwent surgical resection as a training cohort. Other 325 patients in 2013-2016 were included as a validation cohort. Overall mortality of postoperative in-patients was 3.3% (17/521) and 2.8 % (9/325), respectively. Univariate analysis of mortality revealed that frequency of hospitalization, total albumin, different types of PVTT, bleeding volume, blood transfusion, resection volume, and tumor volume were related with mortality. Therefore, the bootstrap validation reflected that the risk factors of multivariate cox regression in model1(frequency of hospitalization, bleeding volume, and tumor volume) and model 2 (frequency of hospitalization, bleeding volume and total albumin) were stable with mortality in hospital. Ten-fold cross-validation of cox regression analysis showed that the mean C-statistic with 95%CI of model1 and model2 respectively were 0.887(0.779-0.976) and 0.867(0.789-0.966) for predicting in-hospital mortality. Consistency results of models were in the training cohort and validation cohort.Conclusion: Total albumin, tumor volume, intraoperative bleeding and frequency of hospitalization were independent predictive factors for in-hospital mortality in HCC patients with PVTT under surgery. Further study is warranted to utilize these factors to lower in-hospital mortality.

Mechanisms and Therapy for Cancer Metastasis to the Brain.

Advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapies have improved survival in cancer patients with an increase of the incidence of newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs). Intracranial metastases are symptomatic in 60–70% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium is more sensitive than computed tomography and advanced neuroimaging techniques have been increasingly used in the detection, treatment planning, and follow-up of BM. Apart from the morphological analysis, the most effective tool for characterizing BM is immunohistochemistry. Molecular alterations not always reflect those of the primary tumor. More sophisticated methods of tumor analysis detecting circulating biomarkers in fluids (liquid biopsy), including circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles, containing tumor DNA and macromolecules (microRNA), have shown promise regarding tumor treatment response and progression. The choice of therapeutic approaches is guided by prognostic scores (Recursive Partitioning Analysis and diagnostic-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment-DS-GPA). The survival benefit of surgical resection seems limited to the subgroup of patients with controlled systemic disease and good performance status. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) can be a complication, especially in posterior fossa metastases undergoing a “piecemeal” resection. Radiosurgery of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and local control as postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT alone is now the treatment of choice only for patients with single or multiple BMs not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery, or with poor prognostic factors. To reduce the neurocognitive sequelae of WBRT intensity modulated radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing, and pharmacological approaches (memantine and donepezil) have been investigated. In the last decade, a multitude of molecular abnormalities have been discovered. Approximately 33% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations develop BMs, which are targetable with different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs: gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, icotinib, and osimertinib). Other “druggable” alterations seen in up to 5% of NSCLC patients are the rearrangements of the “anaplastic lymphoma kinase” gene TKI (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib). In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, breast cancer targeted therapies have been widely used (trastuzumab, trastuzumab-emtansine, lapatinib-capecitabine, and neratinib). Novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have also revolutionized the systemic management of melanoma (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib).

Is surgical resection beneficial in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer?

4043 Background: Although chemotherapy is currently established as a standard treatment in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer, the role of palliative surgical resection is still controversial. We investigated the survival benefit of surgical resection in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer who received systemic chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 698 pts who received palliative chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 307) or primary metastatic (n = 391) gastric cancer. Overall survival (OS) of pts who underwent surgical resection followed by chemotherapy was compared to that of pts who received chemotherapy alone. Results: Among 140 pts (primary metastatic: 97, recurrent: 43) with surgical resection, gastrectomy, metastasectomy, and gastrectomy with metastasectomy were performed in 83 (primary metastatic: 81), 44, and 13 pts, respectively. Higher surgical resection rate was observed in pts with young age ( &lt; 70) (p = 0.010), ECOG PS 0 or 1 (p = 0.010), primary metastatic (p &lt; 0.0001), absence of liver metastasis (p = 0.002), and signet ring cell histology (p = 0.002). The median OS of pts who underwent surgical resection before chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of pts who received chemotherapy alone (19 vs. 9 months, p &lt;0.0001). The OS benefit of surgical resection was consistent across subgroups in terms of baseline characteristics including age, ECOG PS, disease status (primary metastatic vs. recurrent), peritoneal metastasis, and first-line chemotherapy regimen (single vs. combination). In multivariate analysis, surgical resection was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.41, p &lt; 0.0001) along with ≥second-line chemotherapy (p &lt; 0.0001), whereas ECOG PS 2 or 3 (p = 0.013), signet ring cell histology (p &lt; 0.0001), and peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.046) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS. Conclusions: The present study suggests that judicious use of surgical resection before chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer pts may result in favorable outcome, although large scale phase III trials are essential to establish this treatment approach as a standard practice.

Surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous solitary brain metastasis

背景与目的非小细胞肺癌脑转移较多见，常用的治疗方法有放疗、化疗等，但预后不佳。本研究拟了解手术在非小细胞肺癌同步单发脑转移综合治疗中的作用。方法回顾性分析46例非小细胞肺癌同步单发脑转移患者的临床资料。所有患者接受肺部肿瘤切除，术后行全脑放疗及化疗。其中13例患者行脑转移瘤切除，33例患者行脑部立体定向放射治疗。结果本组患者总的中位生存期为16.8个月，1年、2年和3年生存率分别为76.1%、20.9%和4.7%。脑转移瘤手术组和立体定向治疗组的中位生存期分别为18.3个月和15. 8个月（P=0.091, 2）。结论手术切除肺部原发肿瘤及脑转移瘤对改善非小细胞肺癌单发脑转移患者的预后具有一定作用。脑转移瘤手术切除或立体定向治疗对患者的生存期未见有影响。

Curative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer; An Evidenced Based Review

In 2013, roughly 18,000 cases of esophageal cancer will be diagnosed in the United States with more than 15,000 people dying from the disease. Worldwide, an estimated 482,300 new esophageal cancer cases were diagnosed with 406,800 deaths in 2008. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) account for >90% of all esophageal cancer cases. The authors will examine the role of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery in the curative management of esophageal cancer by examining randomized control data, single arm phase II trials, several recently published meta-analyses, as well as retrospective data where there is no clinical trial data available. The role of positron emission tomography (PET) will be reviewed as well. Current data support the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with 3-year overall survival ranging from 30% to 60%. The benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy is limited to margin positive and/or node positive patients. There is emerging data questioning the survival benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy. External beam radiation therapy alone results in very few long-term survivors and is considered palliative at best. Radiation dose-escalation has failed to improve local control or survival. PET scanning is vital in staging and has become a strong predictor of response and survival. Preoperative or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established standard of care for locally advanced cancers of the esophagus. While preoperative chemotherapy is supported by level 1 evidence, the true benefit of induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy has not been established in a prospective randomized control trial. The role of surgery in the management of SCC is still a hotly debated subject, however, it is still recommended for AC. There is no data to support adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to be limited AC. Radiation without chemotherapy is palliative and never curative. PET continues to be integrated into treatment decisions and predicts for response and survival after therapy.

Radiation Therapy and Esophageal Cancer

Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma account for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases. Although the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma has declined, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has risen due to increases in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The authors examine the role of radiation therapy alone (external beam and brachytherapy) for the management of esophageal cancer or combined with other modalities. The impact on staging and appropriate stratification of patients referred for curative vs palliative intent with modalities is reviewed. The authors also explore the role of emerging radiation technologies. Current data show that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection is the accepted standard of care, with 3-year overall survival rates ranging from 30% to 60%. The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy is limited to patients with node-positive cancer. The survival benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy remains controversial. External beam radiation therapy alone results in few long-term survivors and is considered palliative at best. Radiation dose-escalation has failed to improve local control or survival. Brachytherapy can provide better long-term palliation of dysphagia than metal stent placement. Although three-dimensional conformal treatment planning is the accepted standard, the roles of IMRT and proton therapy are evolving and potentially reduce adverse events due to better sparing of normal tissue. Future directions will evaluate the benefit of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, the role of surgery in locally advanced disease, and the identification of responders prior to treatment based on microarray analysis.

Natural History Studies and the Evolution of Regional Treatment Modalities for Patients Withy Isolated Liver Metastases from Primary Colon and Rectum Carcinoma

Estimates for 1995 indicate that 150,000 cases of colon and rectum adenocarcinoma occurred in North America, 58,000 patients died of colorectal cancer, and 18,000 patients died with liver as the predominant or only site of metastatic disease from recurrent colon and rectum adenocarcinoma. Results from several trials can now better define the therapeutic and survival benefit of surgical resection, cryosurgical ablation, and intrahepatic arterial therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver.