Surgical Treatment Of Trigeminal Neuralgia Research Articles

Microvascular decompression using autologous muscle graft for trigeminal neuralgia: a case series and meta-analysis.

We aimed to describe a case series of patients diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who were submitted to microvascular decompression (MVD) using autologous muscle graft (AMG) and perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. Forty-four adult patients who underwent MVD using AMG between 2012 and 2022 were studied retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and surgical factors were assessed. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to May 2023. We used random-effects model for all outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2. We used R software 4.3.1 for all statistical analyses. Among patients in the case series, the mean age was 52 ± 12.9 years, and the proportion of females was 65.9%. Forty-one patients (93.2%) presented complete pain relief after a mean follow-up of 7.7 years. The pooled analysis of immediate pain relief was 91.3% (95% CI 82-96%; I2=78%). The good pain relief during follow-up was 88.2% (95% CI 78-94%; I2=80%) at follow-up. The recurrence rates at 6, 12, 36 months, and during follow-up were 6.2%, 10.5%, 10.3%, and 11%, respectively. In this case series and meta-analysis of over 440 patients, our findings suggest that the practice of MVD using AMG may be an efficient option in the short term as surgical treatment for TN. Further trials should compare AMG with other materials and its effectiveness in a long-term follow-up.

The importance of pre-operative neuroanatomical study in the surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis.

The importance of pre-operative neuroanatomical study in the surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis.

Sex differences in patient journeys to diagnosis, referral, and surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: implications for equitable care.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an orofacial pain disorder that is more prevalent in females than males. Although an increasing number of studies point to sex differences in chronic pain, how sex impacts TN patients' journeys to care has not been previously addressed. This study sought to investigate sex differences in patients' journeys to diagnosis, referral, and treatment of TN within a large national context. Patients with classic TN (n = 100; 50 females and 50 males) were randomly selected through chart reviews at the largest surgical treatment center for TN in Canada for a cross-sectional study. Statistical tests, including Welch's t-test, the chi-square test, Pearson's correlations, and analyses of covariance, were conducted with Python. Key discrepancies between sexes in access to care were identified. Females had a significantly longer referral time interval (average 53.2 months vs 20.4 months, median 27.5 months vs 11.0 months, p = 0.018) and total time interval (average 121.1 months vs 67.8 months, median 78.0 months vs 45.2 months, p = 0.018) than males, despite reporting higher pain intensity at referral. Although medically intolerant patients had a significantly shorter referral time interval than medically tolerant patients (average 13.0 months vs 41.0 months, median 6.0 months vs 17.0 months, p < 0.001), medically tolerant females had a significantly longer referral time interval than medically tolerant males (average 59.9 months vs 21.7 months, median 30.0 months vs 12.0 months, p = 0.017). No statistically significant differences were detected between the sexes for diagnostic time interval (average 63.3 months vs 43.0 months, median 24.0 months vs 24.0 months, p = 0.263) or treatment time interval (average 4.6 months vs 4.7 months, median 4.0 months vs 3.0 months, p = 0.986). Critical sex differences in patients' journeys to TN surgical treatment were identified, with females enduring considerably longer referral timelines and expressing significantly greater pain intensity than males at referral. Taken together, our findings suggest the presence of unconscious bias and discrimination against females and highlight the need for expediting TN treatment referral for female TN patients.

Erenumab in the Treatment of Comorbid Trigeminal Neuralgia in Patients With Migraine.

Background Surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) sometimes becomes difficult. Erenumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-receptor monoclonal antibody, is used for migraine and potentially has efficacy for TN. Method We retrospectively investigated six migraine patients with comorbidity treated with 70 mg of erenumab. Monthly headache days and a numerical rating scale (NRS) of TN were evaluated before, one, and three months after erenumab administration. Results Before being treated with 70 mg of erenumab, the six migraine patients with comorbid TN had taken at least one sort of preventative medication, but it had been ineffective. During the three-month erenumab use, previous medications were continued. The median age was 71 years (range 59-87). The six patients (five females and one male) had episodic migraine. Three had TN due to vessels, one had TN due to a tumor, one had TN without neurovascular compression, and one had an undetermined etiology. Five (83%) of the six patients reported improved NRS of TN. The median NRS of TN before, one, and three months after treatment were 8 (7-10), 3.5 (0-10), and 2 (0-5, n=4). Monthly headache days were 4 (4-10), 2.5 (0-4), and 1 (1-2, n=4). There were no side effects of erenumab. Conclusion Surgical treatment sometimes cannot be performed for those with TN.Our findings were preliminary and a bigger sample size is required for this study to draw firmer conclusions. However, it is possible, although rare, that there are migraine patients for whom the NRS of comorbid TN improves with the use of erenumab, an anti-CGRP receptor monoclonal antibody.

Clinical characteristics of pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: data from a neurosurgical clinic

Among the pain syndromes caused by damage to cranial nerves, trigeminal nerve pathology occupies the main place. Trigeminal neuralgia is an exhausting condition characterized by acute shooting recurrent pain in the face. However, according to modern classification of facial pain types, there is also a distinction made for the second type of neuralgia, in which the mentioned pain alternates with dull, burning pain in the area of trigeminal nerve innervation. Numerous clinical and diagnostic criteria which can influence the results of surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia are being actively studied. However, the data varies both in terms of the number of criteria considered and the nature of the study, as well as the research outcomes.Objective ‒ to determine the demographic, clinical, and anatomical characteristics of patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia upon their admission in the neurosurgical ward for microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve.Materials and мethods. A retrospective analysis of medical data from 92 patients with trigeminal neuralgia, who were admitted to the Regional Clinical Center of Neurosurgery and Neurology from 2011 to 2023 was performed. The data included: patient's gender and age, type of neuralgia according to K. Burchiel and colleagues' classification (2009), involvement of trigeminal nerve branches, duration of pain prior to hospitalization, medication for conservative therapy and its dosage. Results. Trigeminal neuralgia most commonly affects elderly patients. This may be associated with systemic atherosclerotic vessel damage, leading to increased irritation by a denser vessel wall. Another cause of late disease manifestation may be gradual demyelination in the vicinity of the neurovascular conflict. Women are more likely to be affected than men. Right-sided trigeminal nerve involvement and the involvement of lower and upper jaw branches are more characteristic, with pain more frequently being paroxysmal in nature. In seven out of ten patients, the cause of neurovascular conflict is an artery, with the upper cerebellar artery being the most typical conflict.Conclusions. Demographic and clinical-diagnostic indicators vary among patients with trigeminal neuralgia. There are numerous variables that can influence the long-term effects of conservative and surgical treatment in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. A comprehensive assessment of these factors can identify a group of patients who are likely to have the most successful long-term treatment outcomes for trigeminal neuralgia.

Internal neurolysis versus intraoperative glycerin rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.

Internal neurolysis (IN) and intraoperative glycerin rhizotomy (ioGR) are emerging surgical options for patients with trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular contact. The objective of this study was to compare the neurological outcomes of patients who underwent IN with those of patients who underwent ioGR. The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent IN or ioGR for trigeminal neuralgia at our institution. Patient demographic characteristics and immediate postoperative outcomes, as well as long-term neurological outcomes, were compared. Of 1044 patients who underwent open surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, 56 patients underwent IN and 91 underwent ioGR. Of these 147 patients, 37 had no evidence of intraoperative neurovascular conflict. All patients who underwent IN and 96.7% of patients who underwent ioGR had immediate postoperative pain relief. At last follow-up, patients who underwent IN had lower Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scores (p = 0.05), better BNI facial numbness scores (p < 0.01), and a greater degree of pain improvement (p = 0.05) compared with those who underwent ioGR. Patients who underwent IN also had significantly lower rates of symptomatic pain recurrence (p < 0.01) at last follow-up over an average of 9.5 months. IN appears to provide patients with a greater degree of pain relief, lower rates of facial numbness, and lower rates of pain recurrence compared with ioGR. Future prospective studies will better characterize long-term pain recurrence and outcomes.

Contact-free transposition and interposition techniques for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review.

Surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN), by means of interposition of material between nerve and offending vessel, has been shown to be highly efficient. In recent years, treatment by means of vessel transposition has become more frequent, as in singular cases of recurrence, nerval reactions towards interposed material have been noted. In this review we research the classic microvascular decompression (MVD) techniques (interposition) as well as the more recent transposition and their effectiveness, considering patient outcomes as well as complications and recurrences. We searched online databases MEDLINE and LIVIVO, using key words trigeminal neuralgia AND transposition/ AND sling/ AND non compressive technique/ AND microvascular decompression. We included 8 studies for transposition and 20 studies for the interposition, combining for 2045 patients (302 for transposition and 1743 for interposition). 96.1% of patients in the transposition and 93.1% in the interposition group reported a positive outcome immediately postoperatively. At follow-up, 87.4% in the transposition group (follow-up 51.2 months) and 87.9% of patients in the interposition group (follow-up 36.5 months), reported a positive outcome. 16.2% of patients in the transposition and 13.1% in the interposition group had postoperative complications. Recurrence was reported in 5.6% of patients treated with transposition and 2.3% of patients treated with interposition. Transposition presents similar results concerning short- and long-term patient satisfaction for treatment of TGN as well as similar numbers of complications of recurrences as interposition. Yet, current evidence is restricted to a few retrospective studies, thus, evidence is limited so far.

Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in adults.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a painful disorder of the face that negatively affects the functionality of those who suffer from it. Microvascular decompression remains the top choice for its short and long-term outcomes. In those who are not candidates for open surgery, ablative options become valuable, including radiosurgery, and radiofrequency, balloon, and glycerol rhizotomies. Radiosurgery can be useful in cases of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis. A scheme is proposed to facilitate decision-making considering outcomes, predictors of response and complication rates.

Percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: a how I do it.

Surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia may include percutaneous techniques including the balloon compression technique. We present here a simple, effective, and safe adaptation of the historical technique described by Mullan in 1978. Our procedure is performed in a bi-plane neuro-radiology room. During general anesthesia, 14-G needle is guided under radioscopy to foramen ovale. The 3-F embolectomy catheter is then inserted and inflated with contrast for a period of 2min 15s. Our technique, performed entirely under bi-plane fluoroscopy, allows a quicker and more precise surgery and avoids errors in guiding the catheter that can result serious injury.

Surgical Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Various treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) are known to yield initial satisfactory results; however, the surgical treatment has excellent long-term outcomes and a low recurrence rate. Surgical treatment addresses the challenge of vascular compression, which accounts for 85% of the causes of TN. As for surgical treatment for TN, microvascular decompression (MVD) has become the surgical treatment of choice after Peter J. Jannetta reported the results of MVD surgery in 1996. Since then, many studies have reported a success rate of over 90% for the initial surgical treatment. Most MVDs aim to separate (decompress) the culprit vessel from the trigeminal nerve. To increase the success rate of surgery, accurate indications for MVD and management of the offender vessels without complications are critical. In addition, if there is no vascular compression, partial sensory rhizotomy or internal neurolysis can be performed to improve surgical outcomes.

How I do it: two-step transposition technique during endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

Endoscopic microvascular decompression (eMVD) provides excellent visualization and minimally invasive surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The transposition technique is desirable for long-term outcomes of TN. A two-step transposition technique is performed during eMVD for TN due to the arch-shaped superior cerebellar artery (SCA). First, the cerebellomesencephalic segment of the SCA is pulled out using oxycellulose balls. Second, the retracted lateral pontomesencephalic segment of the SCA is detached from the trigeminal nerve and is transposed for fixation at the tentorium cerebelli. The two-step transposition technique offers simple, reliable decompression for TN due to the arch-shaped SCA.

Surgical Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comprehensive Review (Part 1)

Surgical Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comprehensive Review (Part 1)

Surgical Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comprehensive Review (Part 2)

Surgical Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comprehensive Review (Part 2)

Trigeminal Neuralgia: Current Approaches and Emerging Interventions.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has been described in the literature as one of the most debilitating presentations of orofacial pain. This review summarizes over 150 years of collective clinical experience in the medical and surgical treatment of TN. Fundamentally, TN remains a clinical diagnosis that must be distinguished from other types of trigeminal neuropathic pain and/or facial pain associated with other neuralgias or headache syndromes. What is increasingly clear is that there is no catch-all medical or surgical intervention that is effective for all patients with trigeminal neuralgia, likely reflective of the fact that TN is likely a heterogenous group of disorders that jointly manifests in facial pain. The first-line treatment for TN remains anticonvulsant medical therapy. Patients who fail this have a range of surgical options available to them. In general, microvascular decompression is a safe and effective procedure with immediate and durable outcomes. Patients who are unable to tolerate general anesthesia or whose medical comorbidities preclude a suboccipital craniectomy may benefit from percutaneous methodologies including glycerol or radiofrequency ablation, or both. For patients with bleeding diathesis due to blood thinning medications who are ineligible for invasive procedures, or for those who are unwilling to undergo open surgical procedures, radiosurgery may be an excellent option—provided the patient understands that maximum pain relief will take on the order of months to achieve. Finally, peripheral neurectomies continue to provide an inexpensive and resource-sparing alternative to pain relief for patients in locations with limited economic and medical resources. Ultimately, elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying trigeminal neuralgia will pave the way for novel, more effective and less invasive therapies.

Historical aspects of the problem of treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and the role of neurosurgical methods in its solution (literature review)

The trigeminal nerve is a mixed fifth cranial nerve, consisting of motor and sensory components. The sensitive component receives somesthetic information from the skin and mucous membranes of the face into the central nervous system, and the motor component is responsible for the innervation of chewing muscles. One of the manifestations of the pathology of the trigeminal nerve is pain syndrome. Trigeminal neuralgia occupies the main place among neurogenic pain syndrome in the face, is characterized by а severe course and the absence of sufficiently effective methods of treatment. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia in different countries is 2–5 cases per 100 thousand people per year. Trigeminal neuralgia is classified into 3 etiologic categories. Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia occurs without apparent cause. Classical trigeminal neuralgia is caused by vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve root. Secondary trigeminal neuralgia is the consequence of a major neurologic disease, e. g., a tumor of the cеrеbеllоpоntine angle or multiple sclerosis. Today, there are many different options for the surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. microvascular decompression of the root, radiosurgical destruction of the Gasser’s node, radiofrequency destruction, glycerol rhizotomy, balloon microcompression are considered the main effective and proven surgical methods for treating trigeminal neuralgia. But the questions of diagnosing the cause of the disease and choosing an adequate surgical method for treating therapeutically resistant trigeminal neuralgia for a particular patient remain open. The development of surgical methods begins from ancient times to the present day. The main stages in the development of neurosurgical treatment methods are presented. The following surgical techniques are described: open method – microvascular decompression, and closed percutaneous destructive methods – radiofrequency destruction, glycerol rhizotomy, balloon compression, radiosurgery, cryodestruction, laser destruction, botulinum toxin injections.

Pre-operative Limbic System Functional Connectivity Distinguishes Responders From Non-responders to Surgical Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe facial pain condition often requiring surgical treatment. Unfortunately, even technically successful surgery fails to achieve durable pain relief in many patients. The purpose of this study was to use resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to: (1) compare functional connectivity between limbic and accessory sensory networks in TN patients vs. healthy controls; and (2) determine if pre-operative variability in these networks can distinguish responders and non-responders to surgery for TN.Methods: We prospectively recruited 22 medically refractory classic or idiopathic TN patients undergoing surgical treatment over a 3-year period, and 19 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. fMRI was acquired within the month prior to surgery for all TN patients and at any time during the study period for controls. Functional connectivity analysis was restricted to six pain-relevant brain regions selected a priori: anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, and insula. Two comparisons were performed: (1) TN vs. controls; and (2) responders vs. non-responders to surgical treatment for TN. Functional connectivity was assessed with a two-sample t-test, using a statistical significance threshold of p < 0.050 with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons.Results: Pre-operative functional connectivity was increased in TN patients compared to controls between the right insular cortex and both the left thalamus [t(39) = 3.67, p = 0.0007] and right thalamus [t(39) = 3.22, p = 0.0026]. TN patients who were non-responders to surgery displayed increased functional connectivity between limbic structures, including between the left and right hippocampus [t(18) = 2.85, p = 0.0106], and decreased functional connectivity between the ACC and both the left amygdala [t(18) = 2.94, p = 0.0087] and right hippocampus [t(18) = 3.20, p = 0.0049]. Across all TN patients, duration of illness was negatively correlated with connectivity between the ACC and left amygdala (r2 = 0.34, p = 0.00437) as well as the ACC and right hippocampus (r2 = 0.21, p = 0.0318).Conclusions: TN patients show significant functional connectivity abnormalities in sensory-salience regions. However, variations in the strength of functional connectivity in limbic networks may explain why some TN patients fail to respond adequately to surgery.

Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors

ObjectiveCommon surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous procedures (glycerol rhizolysis; thermocoagulation; and balloon compression). Although the efficacy of each procedure has been documented, direct comparisons of their relative efficacies for TN are lacking. We aimed to directly compare long-term outcomes after first-time MVD with percutaneous surgery in primary (idiopathic and classical) TN and identify predictors of outcome.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 185 patients undergoing MVD and 129 undergoing percutaneous surgery. Procedures were performed by one of two neurosurgeons in a single centre; an independent observer collected long-term follow-up data by interviews, using the same outcome measures for all procedures.ResultsMVD patients were younger than those undergoing percutaneous surgery (P <.001). MVD provided superior initial pain relief (P <.001): 87.0% had Barrow Neurological Institute class I or II pain scores after MVD compared with 67.2% after percutaneous surgery. The complication rate for percutaneous procedures was 35.7% and for MVDs was 24.9% (P =.04), including minor and transient complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that MVD provided longer pain relief than percutaneous procedures (P <.001); 25% of patients had recurrence at 96 months following MVD compared with 12 months after percutaneous surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that balloon compression provided more durable relief amongst percutaneous procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that post-operative numbness and age were prognostic factors for percutaneous procedures (P =.03 and .01, respectively).ConclusionsMVD provides better initial pain relief and longer durability of relief than percutaneous surgery, although carrying a small risk of major complications. Amongst percutaneous procedures, balloon compression gave the most durable relief from pain. Older age and post-operative numbness were predictors of good outcome from percutaneous surgery. These results can help clinicians to counsel patients with primary TN on neurosurgical treatment selection for pain relief.

Personal experience with microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.

BackgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe, paroxysmal pain in the distribution of the fifth cranial nerve. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most widely used surgical treatment for TN. We undertook this study to analyze the effects of and complications of MVD and to refine the surgical procedure for treating TN.MethodsA total of 88 patients underwent for TN underwent surgery at our hospital. Among them, 77 patients underwent MVD alone, and 11 underwent partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) with or without MVD. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively analyzed for patient characteristics, clinical results, offending vessels, and complications if any.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 43.2 months (range, 3–216 months). The most common site of pain was V2+V3 territory (n=27), followed by V2 (n=25) and V3 (n=23). The most common offending vessels were the superior cerebellar artery and anterior inferior cerebellar artery in that order. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 46.1%; however, most complications were transient. There were two cases of permanent partial hearing disturbance. In the MVD alone group, the cure rate was 67.5%, and the improvement rate was 26.0%. Among 11 patients who underwent PSR with or without MVD, the cure rate was 50.0%, and the improvement rate was 30.0%.Conclusion The clinical results of MVD were satisfactory. Although the outcomes of PSR were not as favorable as those of pure MVD in this study, PSR can be considered in cases where there is no significant vascular compressive lesion or uncertainty of the causative vessel at the surgery.

Long-term pain outcomes in elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of first-time microvascular decompression and stereotactic radiosurgery.

Common surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The use of MVD in elderly patients has been described but has yet to be prospectively compared to SRS, which is well-tolerated and noninvasive. The authors aimed to directly compare long-term pain control and adverse event rates for first-time surgical treatments for idiopathic TN in the elderly. A prospectively collected database was reviewed for TN patients who had undergone treatment between 1997 and 2017 at a single institution. Standardized collection of preoperative demographics, surgical procedure, and postoperative outcomes was performed. Data analysis was limited to patients over the age of 65 years who had undergone a first-time procedure for the treatment of idiopathic TN with at least 1 year of follow-up. One hundred ninety-three patients meeting the study inclusion criteria underwent surgical procedures for TN during the study period (54 MVD, 24 MVD+Rhiz, 115 SRS). In patients in whom an artery was not compressing the trigeminal nerve during MVD, a partial sensory rhizotomy (MVD+Rhiz) was performed. Patients in the SRS cohort were older than those in the MVD and MVD+Rhiz cohorts (mean ± SD, 79.2 ± 7.8 vs 72.9 ± 5.7 and 70.9 ± 4.8 years, respectively; p < 0.0001) and had a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 3.0 ± 0.9 and 2.9 ± 1.0, respectively; p < 0.0001). Immediate or short-term postoperative pain-free rates (Barrow Neurological Institute [BNI] pain intensity score I) were 98.1% for MVD, 95.8% for MVD+Rhiz, and 78.3% for SRS (p = 0.0008). At the last follow-up, 72.2% of MVD patients had a favorable outcome (BNI score I-IIIa) compared to 54.2% and 49.6% of MVD+Rhiz and SRS patients, respectively (p = 0.02). In total, 0 (0%) SRS, 5 (9.3%) MVD, and 1 (4.2%) MVD+Rhiz patients developed any adverse event. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that procedure type (p = 0.001) and postprocedure sensory change (p = 0.003) were statistically significantly associated with pain control. In this study cohort, patients who had undergone MVD had a statistically significantly longer duration of pain freedom than those who had undergone MVD+Rhiz or SRS as their first procedure. Fewer adverse events were seen after SRS, though the MVD-associated complication rate was comparable to published rates in younger patients. Overall, the results suggest that both MVD and SRS are effective options for the elderly, despite their advanced age. Treatment choice can be tailored to a patient's unique condition and wishes.

Microvascular Decompression versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Single-Institution Experience

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the standard surgical procedure for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has gained increasing popularity as a less invasive technique. We report our institution's outcome in the surgical treatment of TN (MVD vs. SRS), taking patient's age and gender into consideration. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing MVD or SRS for type 1 idiopathic TN between 2004 and 2019 at the University of Iowa. Standardized data collection focused on preoperative clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes including the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Intensity Score. A total of 111 patients underwent MVD and 103 patients underwent SRS for TN. Patients were younger in the MVD (median, 60 years) than SRS (median, 72 years) group. More females (58%) than males (42%) had TN. Multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that an outcome of BNI score I-II (P= 0.365) and III (P= 0.736) can be achieved with either MVD or SRS; however, BNI score IV (P= 0.031) and V (P= 0.022) were more associated with SRS. Six percent of patients in the MVD group and 26% in the SRS group developed pain recurrence and required a second operation. Nine of 10 patients who underwent MVD after failed SRS had complete pain relief. Factoring in patients' age and gender, both MVD and SRS can achieve a favorable outcome for medically refractory TN, although BNI scores of IV and V were more common with SRS.