Rate Of Surgical Site Infection In Patients Research Articles

Post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery patients with thoracolumbar drains: A meta analysis

Closed-suction drains are commonly placed after thoracolumbar surgery to reduce the risk of post-operative hematoma and neurologic deterioration, and may stay in place for a longer period of time if output remains high. Prolonged maintenance of surgical site drains, however, is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). The present study aims to examine the literature regarding extended duration (≥24h) prophylactic antibiotic use in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting the use of 24-h post-operative antibiotics compared with extended duration post-operative antibiotics in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage were identified from a PubMed database query. Six studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1003 patients that received 24h of post-operative antibiotics and 984 patients that received ≥24h of post-operative antibiotics. The SSI rate was 5.16% for the shorter duration group (24h) and 4.44% (p=0.7865) for the longer duration group (≥24h). There is no significant difference in rates of SSI in patients receiving 24h of post-operative antibiotics compared with patients receiving ≥24h of post-operative antibiotics. Shorter durations of post-operative antibiotics in patients with thoracolumbar drains have similar outcomes compared to patients receiving longer courses of antibiotics. Shorter durations of antibiotics could potentially help lead to lower overall cost and length of stay for these patients.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Monocentric, Retrospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a relevant problem with a 25% incidence rate after elective laparotomy due to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether stricter hygienic measures during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the rate of SSI. (2) Methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective cohort study comparing the rate of SSI in patients with bowel resection due to IBD during COVID-19 (1 March 2020–15 December 2021) to a cohort pre-COVID-19 (1 February 2015–25 May 2018). (3) Results: The rate of SSI in IBD patients with bowel resection was 25.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 31.8% pre-COVID-19 (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.40–2.20; p = 0.881). There were seventeen (17.5%) superficial and four (4.1%) deep incisional and organ/space SSIs, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.216). There were more postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses during COVID-19 (7.2% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.021). The strictness of hygienic measures (mild, medium, strict) had no influence on the rate of SSI (p = 0.553). (4) Conclusions: Hygienic regulations in hospitals during COVID-19 did not significantly reduce the rate of SSI in patients with bowel resection due to IBD. A ban on surgery, whereby only emergency surgery was allowed, was likely to delay surgery and exacerbate the disease, which probably contributed to more SSIs and postoperative complications.

Surgical Site Infections in Major Lower Limb Amputation: An International Multicentre Audit (SIMBA): Study Protocol

Background: Over 3,000 major lower limb amputations (MLLA) occur in the UK per annum. A significant proportion of patients following MLLA will go on to develop a surgical site infection (SSI). SSIs can range from a simple superficial infection that is treated with oral antibiotic therapy to deeper infections which can lead to wound dehiscence and, ultimately, surgical revision. SSIs can have a significant impact on patient mobility, function, morbidity and mortality as well as wider effects on carers, community services and hospital systems. Despite these potential impacts there are limited data to determine the rate of SSI in patients undergoing MLLA, adjuncts that successfully prevent SSI, factors that predispose patients to SSI and compliance with national guidance set out by key stakeholders in vascular surgical care. Methods: To address this gap in evidence we propose a large, international, prospective, collaborative audit that aims to compare current practice against recommendations set out by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland and to determine the frequency of significant outcomes related to SSI (as defined by the Centre for Disease Control) in consecutive patients undergoing MLLA over an 8-month period including the incidence of SSI, wound dehiscence and surgical revision at 30 days, frequency of use of adjuncts designed to reduce SSI and predictors of SSI. Outcomes will also be captured at 1 year post-MLLA if funding permits. Discussion: This multicentre audit will allow us to describe the incidence and burden of SSI and wound dehiscence in patients undergoing MLLA. The strengths of this audit will lie in its use of contemporaneous data collection from numerous hospitals and the in-depth data collection focusing primarily on MLLA SSI. It is anticipated that the audit will provide impactful data for future comparisons with global practice and support the design of robust and meaningful studies.

Comparing the Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Versus Normal Saline in Laparotomy Wound Irrigation to Prevent Surgical Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a known complication of laparotomies and intra-abdominal surgical operations leading to remarkable consequences on mortality, morbidity, and expenses. The study aims to assess the efficiency of irrigating laparotomy incision sites with povidone-iodine (PVI) or normal saline (NS) in diminishing the rate of SSIs in patients undergoing gastrointestinal operations for varying indications. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) highlighting the contribution of laparotomy wound irrigation with PVI in opposition to NS in patients planned for laparotomy addressing numerous gastrointestinal issues, and their role in reducing SSI risk were obtained via searching of standard electronic medical databases. The analysis was conducted by utilizing meta-analysis principles procured by statistical software RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). The yield of medical databases exploration and inspection was 13 RCTs on 3816 patients who underwent laparotomy for different gastrointestinal operations. There were 1900 patients in the PVI group whereas 1916 patients received NS wound irrigations preceding closure of the laparotomy skin wound. In the random effects model analysis, the use of PVI for laparotomy wound irrigation was associated with the reduced risk (odds ratio = 0.54, 95%CI (0.30, 0.98), Z = 2.04, P = 0.04) of SSIs. Nevertheless, there was outstanding heterogeneity (Tau2=70; chi2=40.19, df=12; P = 0.0001; I2=70%) among the included studies. According to the comprehensive analysis outcomes, it has been clinically proven that the use of PVIis highly effective in reducing the occurrence of SSIs, as well as their subsequent implications.

A meta-analysis of the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer.

The purpose of the meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) risk factors in patients with colorectal cancer (CC). The results of this meta-analysis were analysed, and the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using dichotomous or contentious random or fixed-effect models. For the current meta-analysis, 23 examinations spanning from 2001 to 2023 were included, encompassing 89 859 cases of CC. Clean-contaminated surgical site wounds had significantly lower infections (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64, p < 0.001) compared to contaminated surgical site wounds in patients with CCs. Males had significantly higher SSIs (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24, p < 0.001) compared to females in patients with CC. American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥3 h had a significantly higher SSI (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71, p < 0.001) compared to <3 score in patients with CCs. Body mass index ≥25 had significantly higher SSIs (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.14, p = 0.01) compared to <25 in patients with CCs. The presence of stoma creation had a significantly higher SSI rate (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.37-3.79, p = 0.001) compared to its absence in patients with CC. Laparoscopic surgery had significantly lower SSIs (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78, p < 0.001) compared to open surgery in patients with CC. The presence of diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher SSI rate (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.33, p < 0.001) compared to its absence in patients with CCs. No significant difference was found in SSI rate in patients with CCs between <3 and ≥3 h of operative time (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.75-1.51, p = 0.72), between the presence and absence of blood transfusion (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.69-3.66, p = 0.27) and between the presence and absence of previous laparotomies (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.93-2.32, p = 0.10). The examined data revealed that contaminated wounds, male sex, an American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥3 h, a body mass index ≥25, stoma creation, open surgery and diabetes mellitus are all risk factors for SSIs in patients with CC. However, operative time, blood transfusion and previous laparotomies were not found to be risk factors for SSIs in patients with CC. However, given that several comparisons had a small number of chosen research, consideration should be given to their values.

Patient and Surgical Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Lower-Extremity Oncological Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Secondary Analysis of the PARITY Trial Data.

The specific risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in orthopaedic oncology patients undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction have not previously been evaluated in a large prospective cohort. In the current study, we aimed to define patient- and procedure-specific risk factors for SSI in patients who underwent surgical excision and endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower-extremity bone or soft-tissue tumors using the prospectively collected data of the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial. PARITY was a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial with a parallel 2-arm design that aimed to determine the effect of a long duration (5 days) versus short duration (24 hours) of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of SSI in patients undergoing surgical excision and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the femur or tibia. In this secondary analysis of the PARITY data, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed to explore predictors of SSI within 1 year postoperatively. A total of 96 (15.9%) of the 604 patients experienced an SSI. Of the 23 variables analyzed in the univariate analysis, 4 variables achieved significance: preoperative diagnosis, operative time, volume of muscle excised, and hospital length of stay (LOS). However, only hospital LOS was found to be independently predictive of SSI in the multivariate regression analysis (hazard ratio per day = 1.03; 95% confidence interval = 1.01 to 1.05; p < 0.001). An omnibus test of model coefficients demonstrated that the model showed significant improvement over the null model (χ2 = 78.04; p < 0.001). No multicollinearity was found. This secondary analysis of the PARITY study data found that the only independent risk factor for SSI on multivariate analysis was hospital LOS. It may therefore be reasonable for clinicians to consider streamlined discharge plans for orthopaedic oncology patients to potentially reduce the risk of SSI. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Central Adjudication Committee and Clinical Site Investigator Agreement on Outcomes in the PARITY Trial: A Secondary Analysis of the PARITY Trial Data.

The detection of a surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with metal implants requires a high degree of clinical acumen. The inherent subjectivity of SSI diagnosis poses a challenge in the design of surgical trials because this subjectivity raises concern for outcome assessment bias. Central Adjudication Committees (CACs) are often utilized to minimize the variability in outcome assessment. Little research has been done to determine the reliability of outcome assessment in trials utilizing a CAC. In the present study, we determined the agreement between the study CAC and the clinical site investigators for the primary and secondary outcome assessments. The Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial was a multicenter, blinded, parallel 2-arm, randomized controlled trial that aimed to determine the effect of a 5-day versus 1-day postoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen on the rate of SSI in patients undergoing surgical excision of tumors in the femur or tibia. The blinded PARITY CAC adjudicated all primary and secondary outcomes identified during the 1-year study follow-up. In the present secondary analysis, the Cohen kappa statistic was utilized to determine the level of agreement. The primary outcome of SSI diagnosis demonstrated a substantial level of agreement between the CAC and the site investigators (0.699; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.595 to 0.803]). Categorization of the SSI (i.e., superficial, deep, or organ space) showed moderate agreement (0.470; 95% CI, 0.382 to 0.558). Secondary outcomes such as the types of reoperations and the indication for reoperation typically showed substantial to almost perfect agreement, whereas antibiotic-related complications showed fair agreement (0.241; 95% CI, 0.000 to 0.474). Although there was a substantial level of agreement between the PARITY CAC and site investigators on the diagnosis of an SSI, as well as typically at least substantial agreement on the causes and types of reoperations, there was less agreement regarding the type of SSI and the occurrence of an antibiotic-related complication. Therefore, the CAC appears to have provided value when adjudicating the depth of infection and when determining the causality of medical complications associated with antibiotics. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Superficial Surgical Site Infections in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Topical Anti-Biofilm Therapy.

Introduction Surgical site infections (SSI) following orthopedic procedures can cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in total joint arthroplasty. Biofilm formation in surgical wounds has made it difficult to prevent and treat these infections. SURGX® Antimicrobial Wound Gel (Next Science, Jacksonville, Florida, USA) was developed to disrupt biofilm formation but has not been evaluated in prophylactic use in total joint arthroplasty to prevent superficial SSI. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution comparing the rate of SSI in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). SSI data were collected from patients with standard postoperative dressings (Group A: Control) and patients with SURGX® applied as part of a standardized dressing following THA/TKA (Group B: Study). Rates of SSI were compared. Results SURGX® was administered to 120 patients, including 91 TKAs and 29 THAs. The overall infection rate in this cohort was 2.5%. No superficial site infections developed. The control group constituted 566 patients, with 386 TKAs and 180 THAs. The infection rate was 1.24%, which included one superficial infection. Binary logistic regression did not show different odds of developing infections with the use of SURGX® (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 0.54-9.13, p=0.27). Conclusion In our small retrospective study, Next Science SURGX® Antimicrobial Wound Gel did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the rate of superficial SSI in total joint arthroplasty; however, Group B did not have any superficial SSI.

Reducing Surgical Site Infections with Silver-impregnated Dressings in Lower Extremity Bypass Patients

Surgical site infection (SSI) after lower extremity (LE) bypass surgery is associated with longer length of stay, higher hospital cost, increased morbidity, and even graft loss. Silver-impregnated dressings have been used by other surgical subspecialties to decrease SSI with reported success. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) published a national expected rate of 7.9% for SSI after LE bypass surgery. In 2018, our institutional SSI rate was 12.8%. To reduce this rate, we transitioned to silver-impregnated dressings for all LE bypass procedures and studied the subsequent impact on SSIs. We used NSQIP data to retrospectively study two consecutive cohorts of vascular surgery patients at a single institution who underwent LE bypasses. Patients in 2019 underwent the standard of care surgery with standard sterile gauze postoperative dressings. Patients in 2020 underwent standard of care surgery and were treated with silver-impregnated dressings. NSQIP criteria were used to determine if patients developed SSIs within 30 days of surgery. The Fischer exact and χ2 tests were used to compare groups before and after the intervention. A total of 282 patients underwent LE bypass in 2019 and 2020. The standard of care cohort had 168 patients with sterile gauze dressings, whereas the cohort after intervention had 114 patients with silver-impregnated dressings. The groups were similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities (Table). When considering all classifications of SSI, there were significantly fewer infections in the silver dressing group compared with the sterile gauze group (9.6 % vs 20.8%; P = .014). There was a non-statistically significant reduction in readmissions and unplanned return to the operating room in the silver dressing group. This study demonstrated a significantly lower rate of SSIs in patients undergoing LE bypass with use of a silver-impregnated dressing when compared with a sterile gauze dressing. Although our study does not demonstrate a causal relationship, this relatively inexpensive and low-risk intervention's association with a significant decrease in an otherwise very serious postoperative complication argues for a change in clinical practice or prospective confirmatory studies to optimize patient outcomes after LE bypass.TableDemographic and comorbidity differences between groups of patients who underwent lower extremity (LE) bypass surgery using sterile gauze dressing (2019) and silver-impregnated dressing (2020), and NSQIP-collected outcomes regarding postoperative surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, unplanned return to operating room, and readmission within 30 daysSterile gauze (n = 168)Silver dressing (n = 114)P-valueMale gender109 (64.8)79 (69.3).5Age, years67.1 (10.8)66.0 (11.2).4Race.7 Asian1 (0.6)2 (1.8) Black or African American25 (14.9)13 (11.4) Unknown11 (6.5)7 (6.1) White131 (78.0)92 (80.7)Emergent surgery10 (5.9)4 (3.5).4Active smoker78 (46.4)52 (45.6).9Diabetes.4 Yes, insulin-dependent47 (28.0)39 (34.2) Yes, non-insulin-dependent32 (19.1)23 (20.2) No89 (53.0)52 (45.6)Hypertension133 (79.2)93 (81.6).6Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease26 (15.5)15 (13.2).6Dialysis10 (5.9)10 (8.8).4Superficial SSI35 (20.8)11 (9.7).014Deep SSI5 (3.0)2 (1.8).7Organ space SSI2 (1.2)6 (5.3).07Wound dehiscence6 (3.6)5 (4.4).8Unplanned return to operating room43 (25.6)32 (28.1).7Readmission39 (23.2)30 (26.3).2Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or number (%). Open table in a new tab

Does Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Endometrial Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Laparotomy? A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer and has a strong association with obesity. Surgical site infection (SSI) carries high morbidity and is more frequent in obese patients. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been proposed to reduce wound morbidity but is more expensive than standard dressings whilst the evidence has been very heterogenous. There is limited evidence to justify this expensive dressing as related to its effectiveness in gynaecological oncology patients. ciNPWT was introduced in New Zealand in 2017 based on the available evidence from studies on SSI in the obstetric population. The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of SSI in patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing laparotomy using standard surgical dressings compared to ciNPWT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 170 patients who underwent a laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma between 2018 and 2019 across three hospitals in New Zealand after the introduction of ciNPWT. Dressings were applied according to individual surgeons’ preferences. Standard dressings and ciNPWT were compared in the occurrence of SSI, wound dehiscence, readmission and return to theatre rates using logistic regression in order to account for potential confounding due to the patient demographics and oncologic and surgical characteristics. Results: There were 129 patients in the standard dressing group and 41 patients in the ciNPWT group. The mean age was 60.4 years (range 25–86). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 38.2 kg/m2 (range 20–69 kg/m2). The percentage of patients who experienced a SSI was higher in the ciNPWT group (34.2% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.159). There was no significant difference between the dressing groups in the occurrence of superficial SSI rate, return to theatre, or readmission. Wound dehiscence and deep/organ space SSI were however worse with ciNPWT (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.09 and aOR 7.19, respectively). Conclusions: This study demonstrated no evidence for the benefit of ciNPWT, and higher rates of deep/organ space SSI. More randomised trials are needed to investigate whether gynaecological oncology patients may benefit from ciNPWT thus justifying the extra cost of this dressing.

Superficial temporal artery injury and delayed post-cranioplasty infection

ObjectiveComplications after cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC) have been reported to be as high as 40%. The superficial temporal artery (STA) is at substantial risk for injury in standard reverse question-mark incisions that are typically used for unilateral DC. The authors hypothesize that STA injury during craniectomy predisposes patients to post-cranioplasty surgical site infection (SSI) and/or wound complication. MethodsA retrospective study of all patients at a single institution who underwent cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy and who underwent imaging of the head (computed tomography angiogram, magnetic resonance imaging with intravenous contrast, or diagnostic cerebral angiography) for any indication between the two procedures was undertaken. The degree of STA injury was classified and univariate statistics were used to compare groups. ResultsFifty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients (61%) had evidence of complete or partial STA injury on pre-cranioplasty imaging. Nine patients (16.7%) developed either an SSI or wound complication after cranioplasty and, among these, four (7.4%) experienced delayed (>2 weeks from cranioplasty) complications. Seven of 9 patients required surgical debridement and cranioplasty explant. There was a stepwise but non-significant increase in post-cranioplasty SSI (STA present: 10%, STA partial injury: 17%, STA complete injury: 24%, P=0.53) and delayed post-cranioplasty SSI (STA present: 0%, STA partial injury: 8%, STA complete injury: 14%, P=0.26). ConclusionsThere is a notable but statistically non-significant trend toward increased rates of SSI in patients with complete or partial STA injury during craniectomy.

A Prospective Study of Surgical Site Infection with its Risk Factors and Their Correlation with the NNIS Risk Index.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the third most commonly reported nosocomial infection, accounting for 10%-40% of all nosocomial infections and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Knowledge of factors related to SSI can help in reducing its incidence and related morbidity, which in many studies is shown to account for 38% of all infections in surgical patients. Lack of extending nosocomial infection surveillance programme and prevention measures in countries like India is viewed as a major challenge for the future. The aims of this work were (1) to study the SSI rate in patients undergoing both elective and emergency abdominal surgery and SSI with CDC, and NNIS risk index; and (2) to assess SSI along with body mass index (BMI), glycaemic status, smoking and duration of pre-operative hospital stay of patients. In total, 300 patients who underwent elective and emergency abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. SSI with CDC's NNIS risk index were analysed considering BMI, glycaemic status, smoking and duration of pre-operative hospital stay of patients. In total, 300 cases of abdominal surgeries (elective and emergency) were analysed, out of which 60 cases were diagnosed to have SSI as per the criteria. This study demonstrated that there is a significant increase in SSI with increasing NNIS score that is, the greater the NNIS score, the greater the risk of SSI. With an increase in age, BMI, glycaemic index and preoperative hospital stay, the risk of SSI increases. Smoking and associated comorbidities also increase the risk of SSI.

Surgical site infections in patients undergoing breast oncological surgery during the lockdown: An unexpected lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: The present study aims to evaluate how the measures to contain the SARS-CoV-2 spreading affected the surgical site infections (SSIs) rate in patients who underwent nondeferrable breast cancer surgery (BCS).Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a consecutive series of patients underwent nondeferrable BCS in a regional Italian Covid-free hub during two different period: March to April 2020 (pandemic cohort [PC]) and March till April 2019 (control cohort [CC]). SSIs were defined according to the criteria established by the Center for disease control and prevention (CDC) and additional treatment, serous discharge, erythema, purulent exudate, separation of deep tissues, isolation of bacteria, and stay (ASEPSIS) scoring systems.Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients were included in the present study: 100 and 99 patients who underwent nondeferrable BCS from March to April 2020 (PC) and from March to April 2019 (CC), respectively. The overall SSIs rate in this series was 9.1% according to CDC criteria and 6.5% according to ASEPSIS criteria. The SSIs incidence decreased during the pandemic period. Moreover, the SSIs rate according to ASEPSIS criteria was statistically lower in the PC than in the CC. We observed significant evidence of higher SSIs, both in terms of CDC and ASEPSIS score, in patients having undergone breast reconstruction compared with patients not undergoing immediate reconstruction.Conclusions: The restrictive measures issued during the lockdown period seemed to lower the SSIs rates in patients undergoing nondeferrable BCS.

Topical vancomycin reduces surgical site infections in patients subjected to craniotomy for primary brain tumor resection: A comprehensive cancer center experience

BackgroundCraniotomies for resection of neoplastic lesions are at increased risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) as compared to non-neoplastic pathologies. SSIs can be detrimental due to delay in pivotal adjuvant therapies. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the rate of SSI in primary brain tumors, to analyze risk factors, and to evaluate effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing SSIs. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a National Cancer Institutedesignated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 799) who were subjected to craniotomy from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, use of topical vancomycin and clinical outcomes were analyzed. ResultsTopical vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of SSI (0.8%) compared to standard care (5%), ( p = 0.00071; OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.02 – 0.5). Narcotic use ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.24; 95% CI = 0.96 – 4.81), previous brain radiation ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.02 – 4.29), length of hospitalization ( p = 0.01; OR= 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01 – 1.08), and 30 day re-operation ( p = 1.58 ×10 −10; OR = 15.23; 95% CI = 7.06 – 32.71) were associated with increased risk for SSI. ConclusionTopical vancomycin effectively reduced the rate of SSI in patients subjected to craniotomy for primary brain tumor resection. Furthermore, preoperative narcotic use, previous head/brain radiation, length of hospitalization, and 30-day reoperation were associated with increased risk of SSI.

Postoperative surgical site infection rate in patients with diabetes following Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) amongst patients with diabetes is largely unknown. Evaluate diabetes as a potential SSI risk factor in MMS by comparing SSI incidence in a cohort of patients with and without diabetes. A 5-year retrospective review to determine SSI rate in patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes. SSI incidence in patients with diabetes was further compared by A1c, and the impact of antibiotics on SSI rate was also examined. Overall rate of SSI was 1.47% (53/3597 cases). SSI rate amongst patients with diabetes was 1.95% (14/719 cases) compared to 1.35% (39/2878 cases) in patients without diabetes, with a non-significant odds ratio for SSI of 1.45 (95% CI = 0.78-2.68, P = 0.241). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed no difference in SSI. Stratification of diabetic patients by A1c into ≥7.0 and <7.0 compared to patients without diabetes yielded no statistically significant difference in SSI amongst all groups (P = 0.815). Whether an antibiotic was prescribed did not significantly impact SSI rate between groups. No significant difference in postoperative SSI was found in patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes following MMS regardless of degree of glycaemic control.

Association Between Antimicrobial Prophylaxis With Double-Dose Cefuroxime and Surgical Site Infections in Patients Weighing 80 kg or More

Many guidelines recommend a weight-adopted dose increase of cefuroxime for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). However, the evidence that this approach is associated with lower rates of surgical site infection (SSI) is limited. To assess whether double-dose cefuroxime SAP was associated with a decreased SSI rate in patients weighing at least 80 kg. This cohort study included adult patients (>18 years) weighing at least 80 kg who underwent 9 major surgical procedures with a cefuroxime SAP administration from the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between January 2015 and December 2019 at 142 Swiss hospitals. The follow-up was 30 days for all surgical procedures and 1 year for implant-related operations. Cefuroxime SAP dose (1.5 vs 3.0 g). Overall SSI. A mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for institutional, epidemiological, and perioperative variables was applied. Results were stratified by weight categories as well as by wound contamination classes. Of 41 076 eligible patients, 37 640 were included, with 22 625 (60.1%) men and a median (IQR) age of 61.9 (49.9-71.1) years. The outcome SSI was met by 1203 patients (3.2%). Double-dose cefuroxime was administered to 13 246 patients (35.2%) and was not significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02; P = .10). After stratification by weight category, double-dose SAP vs single-dose SAP was associated with lower SSI rates among 16 605 patients weighing at least 80 to less than 90 kg (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97; P = .02) but not in the other weight categories (≥90 to <100 kg, 10 342 patients: aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.47; P = .37; ≥100 to <120 kg, 8099 patients: aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76-1.30; P = .96; ≥120 kg, 2594 patients: aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.04; P = .06). After stratification by contamination class, double-dose SAP was associated with lower SSI rates among 1946 patients with contaminated wounds (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.84; P = .008) but not those with clean wounds (25 680 patients; aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12; P = .44) or clean-contaminated wounds (10 014 patients; aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.12; P = .37) compared with a single dose. In this study, double-dose SAP with cefuroxime for patients weighing at least 80 kg was not consistently associated with a lower SSI rate.

Effect of Preoperative Skin Preparation Methods on Sternotomy Surgical Site Infection Rates: A Quasi-Experimental Study

A surgical site infection (SSI) reduces patient quality of life, increases morbidity and mortality rates, and increases health care costs. Results of studies comparing the effects of preoperative skin preparations are contradictory. This study aimed to determine the effect of different preoperative skin preparation methods on the rate of SSIs in patients undergoing sternotomy. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among 96 male patients undergoing sternotomy. The control group (CG) (n = 34) received routine care consisting of shaving body hair with a razor blade followed by instructions to take a bath or shower. In the intervention groups, patients received education about SSI prevention and body hair was removed with an electric clipper, followed by bathing with daphne soap containing olive oil (IG-1) (n = 31) or 2% chlorhexidine solution (IG-2) (n = 31). Patient demographic, medical history, surgical, and wound assessment variables were obtained. Potential SSI signs and symptoms were assessed for up to 90 days following surgery. Patient demographic, medical history, and surgical variables did not differ among the 3 groups. Sternal SSI occurred in 10.4% of all study patients; 8.8% of the CG patients, 12.9% of the IG-1 patients, and 9.7% of the IG-2 patients developed an SSI (P > .05). There were no significant differences in the rate of sternotomy SSI among the 3 groups. Randomized controlled trials with large samples are needed to compare these methods to determine optimal and affordable preoperative skin preparation methods.

Infection prevention plan to decrease surgical site infections in bariatric surgery patients.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications of bariatric surgery. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (QI) Program (MBSAQIP) allows accredited programs to develop processes for quality improvement based on data collection. The objective of this study was to decrease SSI rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery at an accredited MBSAQIP center. Using the MBSAQIP semiannual report, SSI rates were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline SSI rates were collected from 01/01/2014-12/31/2015. On 01/01/2016, the first infection prevention protocol (IPP-1) was created that included 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) showers, CHG wipes immediately prior to surgery, and routine cultures of SSIs. An updated IPP (IPP-2) was implemented on 09/01/2016, which discontinued routine surgical drain placement and broadened antibiotic coverage for penicillin allergic patients. During baseline data collection, SSI rates were 5.1%. After the implementation of IPP-1, SSI rates trended down to 2.5%. After implementation of IPP-2, SSI rates decreased significantly to 1.5%, a 66% relative risk reduction in SSIs from baseline. On multivariate regression analysis, the perioperative factors associated with an increased risk for SSIs included diabetes mellitus, intraoperative surgical drain placement, the number of hypertension medications prior to bariatric surgery, and an open approach. Our study demonstrates that the implementation of a specific protocol for reducing SSIs is safe and feasible in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We also identified that the success of the IPP is likely centered on the elimination of routine drain placement during primary bariatric procedures.

Effect of Intra-Operative Hypothermia on Post-Operative Morbidity in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Current guidelines recommend maintaining intra-operative normothermia to avoid surgical site infections (SSI) after colorectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether compliance with normothermia as part of temperature management measures is an effective strategy to reduce post-operative SSI and complications. Patients and Methods: This was a cohort study of patients undergoing surgery for primary colorectal cancer in 2011-2017 in a large teaching hospital in which temperature management using the Bair Hugger™ system (3M™ Center, St. Paul, MN) was standard care. Data from the prospective Dutch Surgical Audit (DCRA) database were complemented by highly granular intra-operative central body temperature data. A multivariable logistic regression model was used. Results: A total of 1,015 patients undergoing surgery for primary colorectal cancer were included. Temperature outcomes for the entire study cohort were as follows: mean temperature was 36.3°C (standard deviation [SD] ±0.5°C), median temperature nadir was 35.8°C (interquartile range [IQR] 35.6°C-36.1°C), median percentage of time at nadir was 2.0% (IQR 0.8%-10.7%), and median percentage of time less than 36.0°C was 1.0% (IQR 0.0%-33.3%). Thirty-day SSI rate was 10% (n = 101). Logistic regression models adjusting for gender, diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI), rectal cancer, duration of surgery, open surgery, emergency surgery, and period of surgery showed no association between any of the four temperature outcomes and SSI. Multivariable analysis also failed to show an association between intra-operative hypothermia and 30-day complications, mortality, or re-admission. Conclusions: In a hospital in which temperature management is standard care, intra-operative hypothermia and SSI rates in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were low. Compliance with normothermia appears to be an effective strategy to reduce SSI.

Impact of bodyweight-adjusted antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical-site infection rates.

BackgroundAntimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) adjustment according to bodyweight to prevent surgical-site infections (SSI) is controversial. The impact of weight-adjusted AMP dosing on SSI rates was investigated here.MethodsResults from a first study of patients undergoing visceral, vascular or trauma operations, and receiving standard AMP, enabled retrospective evaluation of the impact of bodyweight and BMI on SSI rates, and identification of patients eligible for weight-adjusted AMP. In a subsequent observational prospective study, patients weighing at least 80 kg were assigned to receive double-dose AMP. Risk factors for SSI, including ASA classification, duration and type of surgery, wound class, diabetes, weight in kilograms, BMI, age, and AMP dose, were evaluated in multivariable analysis.ResultsIn the first study (3508 patients), bodyweight and BMI significantly correlated with higher rates of all SSI subclasses (both P < 0.001). An 80-kg cut-off identified patients receiving single-dose AMP who were at higher risk of SSI. In the prospective study (2161 patients), 546 patients weighing 80 kg or more who received only single-dose AMP had higher rates of all SSI types than a group of 1615 who received double-dose AMP (odds ratio (OR) 4.40, 95 per cent c.i. 3.18 to 6.23; P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis including 5021 patients from both cohorts, bodyweight (OR 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02; P = 0.008), BMI (OR 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02; P = 0.007) and double-dose AMP (OR 0.33, 0.23 to 0.46; P < 0.001) among other variables were independently associated with SSI rates.ConclusionDouble-dose AMP decreases SSI rates in patients weighing 80 kg or more.