Achalasia is classified into three HRM subtypes that predict outcomes from diverse management strategies. We assessed if symptomatic response varied when a single management strategy-Heller myotomy (HM)-is employed. Treatment-naive subjects with achalasia referred for HM were followed in this observational cohort study. Chicago criteria designated achalasia subtypes (subtype I: no esophageal pressurization; subtype II: panesophageal pressurization in ≥20% swallows; subtype III: premature contractions in ≥20% swallows). Symptom questionnaires assessed symptom burden before and after HM on five-point Likert scales (0=no symptoms, 4=severe symptoms) and on 10-cm visual analog scales (global symptom severity, GSS); satisfaction with HM was recorded similarly. Data were analyzed to determine predictors of GSS change across subtypes. Sixty achalasia subjects (56.1±2.4years, 55% female) fulfilled inclusion criteria, 15% with subtype I, 58% with subtype II, and 27% with subtype III achalasia. Baseline symptoms included dysphagia (solids: 85%, liquids: 73%), regurgitation (84%), and chest pain (35%); mean GSS was 7.1±0.3. Upon follow-up 2.1±0.2years after HM, GSS declined to 1.9±0.4 (p<0.001), with surgical satisfaction score of 8.7±0.3 out of 10; these were similar across achalasia subtypes. On univariate analysis, female gender, Eckardt score, severity of transit symptoms, and maximal IRP predicted linear GSS improvement; female gender (p=0.003) and dysphagia for liquids (p=0.043) remained predictive on multivariate analysis. When a uniform surgical approach is utilized, symptomatic outcome and satisfaction with therapy are similar across achalasia subtypes. Female gender and severity of dysphagia for solids may predict better HM outcome.