Surgical Revascularization Strategies Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization Strategies Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Primary Noncoronary Cardiac Surgery.

Information regarding quantitative flow ratio (QFR) usage in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is lacking. We compared the incidence of postoperative long-term adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after QFR-guided or coronary angiography-guided adult cardiac surgery with concurrent bypass surgery. This study included 432 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at our institution with at least 1 angiographical coronary artery lesion (diameter stenosis: 30% to 90%) between January 2015 and January 2016. The QFR of each patient was calculated. Patients who only underwent intraoperative coronary revascularization following the principles of optimal revascularization strategy were assigned to group A. Patients with coronary lesions not meeting the above criteria were placed in group B. The average number of distal anastomoses of patients with combined CABG in group B was similar to that in Group A (1.9±1.0 vs. 1.7±0.9; P=0.081). Group A had a shorter CPB duration (114.4±49.2 vs 135.8±55.2 minutes; P<0.001) and shorter aortic cross-clamping time (83.6±36.2 vs 101.1±40.6 minutes; P<0.001). The rates of perioperative mortality and major complications did not differ between groups. Long-term major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were less common in group A than in group B (14.7% vs 29.5%; P<0.001). In primary noncoronary cardiac surgery, despite the similar average numbers of distal anastomoses, the group with target vessels treated using an optimal coronary revascularization strategy presented shorter CPB time and aortic cross-clamping time than the other group. Multivariate analyses also showed a lower incidence of long-term MACCEs.

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with impaired renal function.

The optimal strategy for surgical revascularization in patients with impaired renal function is inconclusive. We compared early and late outcomes between bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) and single ITA (SITA) grafting in patients with renal dysfunction. This is a retrospective analysis of all the patients with multivessel disease and impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in our center during 1996-2011, utilizing either BITA or SITA revascularization. Of the 5301 patients with multivessel disease who underwent surgical revascularization during the study period, 391 were with impaired renal function: 212 (54.2%) underwent BITA, 179 (45.8%) underwent SITA. Patients who underwent BITA were less likely to have comorbidities. Statistically significant differences were not observed between the BITA and SITA groups in 30-day mortality (5.6% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.2) and in rates of early stroke, myocardial infarction, and sternal infection (4.5% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.467; 1.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.517; and 2.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.088, respectively). Long-term survival of the BITA group was better: median 8.36 vs. 4.14 years, p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.556-0.89, p = 0.003). In analysis of a matched cohort (134 pairs), early outcomes did not differ between the groups; however, in multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality ‎‎(HR = 0.35 (95%CI 0.18-0.68), p = 0.002)‎. BITA revascularization did not impact early outcome in patients with CRF, but demonstrated a significant protective effect on long-term survival ‎in the unmatched and matched cohorts.

Multiarterial vs Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: 10-Year Follow-up of 1 Million Patients

BackgroundAlthough many options exist for multivessel coronary revascularization, controversy persists over whether multiarterial grafting (MAG) confers a survival advantage over single-arterial grafting (SAG) with saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study sought to compare longitudinal survival between patients undergoing MAG and those undergoing SAG. MethodsAll patients undergoing isolated CABG with ≥2 bypass grafts in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2008-2019) were linked to the National Death Index. Risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability weighting and multivariable modeling. The primary end point was longitudinal survival. Subpopulation analyses were performed and volume thresholds were analyzed to determine optimal benefit. ResultsA total of 1,021,632 patients underwent isolated CABG at 1108 programs (100,419 MAG [9.83%]; 920,943 SAG [90.17%]). Median follow-up was 5.30 years (range, 0-12 years). After risk adjustment, all characteristics were well balanced. At 10 years, MAG was associated with improved unadjusted (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI 0.58-0.61) and adjusted (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88) 10-year survival. Center volume of ≥10 MAG cases/year was associated with benefit. MAG was associated with an overall survival advantage over SAG in all subgroups, including stable coronary disease, acute coronary syndrome, and acute infarction. Survival was equivalent to that with SAG for patients age ≥80 years and those with severe heart failure, renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, or obesity. Only patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 had superior survival with SAG. ConclusionsMultiarterial CABG is associated with superior long-term survival and should be the surgical multivessel revascularization strategy of choice for patients with a body mass index of less than 40 kg/m2.

Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard for the treatment of multivessel and left main coronary heart disease. However, the current evidence about the optimal surgical revascularization strategy is inconsistent and is not sufficient to allow for definite conclusions. Thus, this topic needs to be extensively discussed. The aim of this present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB), conventional on-pump CABG (C-CABG), and on-pump beating heart (ONBEAT) CABG via an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published in English before 1 December 2021. Published trials that included patients who received OPCAB, C-CABG, and ONBEAT CABG were selected. Two authors independently screened the search results, assessed the full texts to identify eligible studies and the risk of bias of the included studies, and extracted data. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality in patients who underwent C-CABG, OPCAB, or ONBEAT CABG. The secondary outcomes were postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal impairment in the three groups. The time point for analysis of outcomes was all time periods during the postoperative follow-up. A total of 39385 patients (83496.2 person-years) in 65 studies who fulfilled the prespecified criteria were included. In the network meta-analysis, OPCAB was associated with an increase of 12% in the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with C-CABG [odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.21], a reduction of 49% in the risk of myocardial infarction when compared with ONBEAT (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.99), a reduction of 16% in the risk of stroke when compared with C-CABG (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99) and a similar risk of renal impairment when compared with C-CABG and ONBEAT. OPCAB was associated with higher all-cause mortality but lower postoperative stroke compared with C-CABG. OPCAB was associated with a lower postoperative myocardial infarction than that of ONBEAT. Early mortality was comparable among OPCAB, ONBEAT, and C-CABG.

Reconstruction of Scalp Defects Using Rotational Flaps After Revascularization Surgery in Patients with Moyamoya Disease

Treating scalp defects after revascularization surgery is difficult because the scalp microcirculation is severely compromised. We aimed to review the clinical effects of using rotational flaps in scalp defect reconstruction and explore risk factors for wound-related complications (WRC) after reconstruction surgery. We retrospectively identified patients with scalp defects after combined revascularization surgery who were surgically treated with rotational flap reconstruction at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022. We analyzed treatment results in different surgical technique and revascularization strategy cohorts, including direct bypass superficial temporal artery branch selection, indirect bypass types, and skin incisions. Eleven patients were included. The superficial temporal artery parietal branch was selected for direct bypass surgery in 10 (90.9%) patients, 4 (40%) of whom had WRC after flap reconstruction. Five types of indirect bypass surgeries were performed; three patients treated by encephalo-duro-myo-arterio-perio-synangiosis and 1 patient treated by encephalo-duro-myo-perio-synangiosis had WRC after flap reconstruction. Question mark (n= 6, 54.5%), curved (n= 4, 36.65%), and Y-shaped (n= 1, 9.1%) incisions were used; in the first three incision cohorts, 2 patients in each cohort had WRC after flap reconstruction. Patients had the following commonalities that may be risk factors for WRC after flap reconstruction: 1) wounds with nonviable bone exposure after revascularization surgery; 2) three or more tissues used as donor tissues and donor tissues containing the periosteum; and 3) thin scalp around the defect.

Understanding the role of coronary artery revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and multivessel disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Advances and innovations in medical therapy have been shown to play a crucial role in improving the prognosis of patients with CAD and HFrEF; however, mortality rate in these patients remains high, and the role of surgical and/or percutaneous revascularization strategy is still debated. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial and the Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction (REVIVED) trial have attempted to provide an answer to this issue. Nevertheless, the results of these two trials have generated further uncertainties. Their findings do not provide a definitive answer about the ideal clinical phenotype for surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization and dispute the historical dogma on myocardial viability and the theory of myocardial hibernation, raising new questions about the proper selection of patients who are candidates for coronary revascularization. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the actual available evidence of coronary artery revascularization in patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction and to suggest new insights on the proper selection and management strategies in this high-risk clinical setting.

Management of Coronary Artery Disease in CADASIL Patients: Review of Current Literature.

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common heritable form of vascular dementia in adults. It is well-established that CADASIL results in neurocognitive dysfunction and mood disturbance. There is also cumulative evidence that CADASIL patients are more susceptible to ischemic heart disease. The aim of this study is to review the current literature regarding the incidence of coronary artery disease in CADASIL patients with a focus on the various management options and the clinical challenges associated with each of these treatment strategies. We conducted a literature search using Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for papers that reported the occurrence of coronary artery disease in patients with CADASIL. We supplemented the search with a manual search in Google Scholar. Only case reports, case series, and original articles were included. The search resulted in six reports indicating the association between coronary artery disease and CADASIL and its management. Evidence suggests that extracranial manifestations of CADASIL may include coronary artery disease, presenting as a more extensive burden of disease in younger patients. Surgical and percutaneous revascularization strategies are feasible, but the incidence of peri-procedural stroke remains significant and should be weighed against the potential benefit derived from either of these strategies. A multidisciplinary approach to therapy, with perspectives from neurologists, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons, is needed to provide the appropriate treatment to the CADASIL patient with severe coronary artery disease. Future studies should be directed toward the development of targeted therapies that may help with the early detection and prevention of disease progress in these patients.

Surgical revascularization strategies of CAD involving dual left anterior descending artery.

Dual left anterior descending artery (LAD) is not an uncommon coronary artery anomaly. Preoperative identification of this anomaly in patients with coronary artery disease is important to develop strategies to ensure complete revascularization of the LAD territory. From April 1996 through February 2022, more than 16,500 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) by our team. Retrospective review of the angiographic and operative records of these patients revealed 85 cases with stenosis of the dual LAD system. The incidence of dual LAD in patients undergoing CABG is 0.51%. Among the 85 patients, 59 (69.4%) had stenosis of both long and short LADs, whereas the remaining 26 (30.5%) had stenosis of either of the LADs. Among the 59 patients who had stenosis of both the LADs, 26 (44.1%) received a left internal thoracic artery (LITA) sequential graft to bypass both the LADs and two received a LITA-LITA baby-Y graft. And in 31 (52.5%) patients, the longer LAD was revascularized with LITA and the other LAD with saphenous vein graft.

What does complete revascularization mean in 2021? - Definitions, implications, and biases.

Coronary revascularization is known to be an excellent treatment for coronary artery disease. However, whether incomplete myocardial revascularization compromises long-term outcomes, as compared to complete revascularization (CR), remains contentious. Herein, we review the concept of and evidence on CR/incomplete revascularization (ICR) and discuss future perspectives. When possible, achieving CR in coronary artery bypass grafting is desirable; nonetheless, ICR is also a reasonable option to balance the therapeutic benefits against the risks. Although angiography-based assessment currently remains the standard of care, fractional flow reserve guidance may reduce the number of lesions requiring revascularization, which may be helpful for an appropriate surgical revascularization strategy. In particular, utilizing this approach may refine hybrid revascularization procedures, especially among high-risk patients.

Long Term Response to Circulating Angiogenic Cells, Unstimulated or Atherosclerotic Pre-Conditioned, in Critical Limb Ischemic Mice.

Critical limb ischemia (CLI), the most severe form of peripheral artery disease, results from the blockade of peripheral vessels, usually correlated to atherosclerosis. Currently, endovascular and surgical revascularization strategies cannot be applied to all patients due to related comorbidities, and even so, most patients require re-intervention or amputation within a year. Circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) constitute a good alternative as CLI cell therapy due to their vascular regenerative potential, although the mechanisms of action of these cells, as well as their response to pathological conditions, remain unclear. Previously, we have shown that CACs enhance angiogenesis/arteriogenesis from the first days of administration in CLI mice. Also, the incubation ex vivo of these cells with factors secreted by atherosclerotic plaques promotes their activation and mobilization. Herein, we have evaluated the long-term effect of CACs administration in CLI mice, whether pre-stimulated or not with atherosclerotic factors. Remarkably, mice receiving CACs and moreover, pre-stimulated CACs, presented the highest blood flow recovery, lower progression of ischemic symptoms, and decrease of immune cells recruitment. In addition, many proteins potentially involved, like CD44 or matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), up-regulated in response to ischemia and decreased after CACs administration, were identified by a quantitative proteomics approach. Overall, our data suggest that pre-stimulation of CACs with atherosclerotic factors might potentiate the regenerative properties of these cells in vivo.

Beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundBeating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), otherwise known as BH-ONCAB, can reduce myocardial injury by preserving native coronary blood flow while maintaining hemodynamic stability by the effective support of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study aimed to identify whether BH-ONCAB confers a survival, mortality, or morbidity benefit over off-pump CABG (OPCAB).MethodsA systematic literature review identified 18 studies incorporating 5,615 patients (1,548 BH-ONCAB and 4,067 OPCAB cases) who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcome measures were meta-analyzed using random-effects modeling. Between-study heterogeneity was investigated through quality assessment and risk of bias analysis.ResultsThe results demonstrated comparable early mortality and long-term survival between BH-ONCAB and OPCAB coronary revascularization with no significant statistical differences. The incidences of stroke, renal failure, blood loss, and arrhythmias were significantly higher in patients who underwent BH-ONCAB than patients who underwent OPCAB. However, BH-ONCAB conferred lower rates of incomplete revascularization and greater numbers of distal anastomoses.ConclusionsBH-ONCAB is a safe and comparable alternative to OPCAB in terms of early mortality and late survival. BH-ONCAB may confer particular advantages in preventing incomplete revascularization and allowing more distal anastomoses compared to OPCAB. However, BH-ONCAB was associated with more postoperative complications due to the use of CPB. Future work should focus on larger matched studies and multicenter randomized controlled trials to optimize our surgical revascularization strategies.

Changes in surgical revascularization strategy after fractional flow reserve.

In the randomized GRAFFITI trial, surgeons drew their strategy based on coronary angiography. When patients were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guidance, surgeons were informed of the FFR values and asked to redraw their strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes induced by FFR knowledge. The intended and performed strategy (before and after FFR) were compared. Among 172 patients, 84 with 300 lesions were randomized to the FFR-guided group. The intended strategy was to bypass 236 stenoses:108 with a venous and 128 with an arterial graft. After disclosing FFR, a change in strategy occurred in 64 lesions (21.3%) of 48 (55%) patients. Among 64 lesions for which the intended strategy was medical therapy, 16 (25%) were bypassed after disclosing FFR. The number of procedures with >1 venous graft planned was significantly reduced from 37 to 27 patients (p=.031). The proportion of on-pump surgery was significantly reduced from 71 to 61 patients (p=.006). The rates of clinical events at 1year were similar between patients with or without at least one change in strategy. FFR-guided CABG is associated with a simplified surgical procedure in 55% of the patients, with similar clinical outcomes.

Cerebrovascular bypass for ruptured aneurysms: A case series

In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) unfavorable for endovascular or traditional open surgical techniques, surgical revascularization strategies comprise one of remaining limited options. There is nonetheless a paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of bypass in aSAH. In this study, we aimed to investigate complications and outcomes in a cohort of patients with aSAH treated with bypass. A prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients treated for aSAH between 2013 and 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Complications and functional status at discharge were recorded and analyzed for the patients that underwent bypass surgery. Forty patients with aSAH were treated with bypass surgery (23 extracranial-intracranial; 17 intracranial-intracranial). All-cause perioperative mortality was 13% (6 patients). At discharge and at mean 14-month follow up, respectively, 16/40 (40%) and 16/25 (64%) of patients achieved a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4–5. All-cause, in-hospital complications occurred in 28 patients (70%), of which any ischemic complication occurred in 20 patients (50%), 7 (18%) being open surgical complications. This work represents the largest modern series of bypass for aSAH to date. In cases of aSAH unfavorable for endovascular intervention or traditional open surgical techniques, bypass remains a viable option in this complex group of patients.

Safety and feasibility evaluation of planning and execution of surgical revascularisation solely based on coronary CTA and FFRCT in patients with complex coronary artery disease: study protocol of the FASTTRACK CABG study

IntroductionThe previously published SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial demonstrated that clinical decision-making between coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) had a very...

Temporal trends and outcomes of critical limb ischemia among patients with chronic kidney disease.

There is a paucity of data on the outcomes and revascularization strategies for critical limb ischemia (CLI) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hence, we conducted a nationwide analysis to evaluate the trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for CLI with CKD. The National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2015) was queried for hospitalizations for CLI. The trends of hospitalizations for CLI with CKD were reported, and endovascular versus surgical revascularization strategies for CLI with CKD were compared. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. The analysis included 2,139,640 hospitalizations for CLI, of which 484,224 (22.6%) had CKD. There was an increase in hospitalizations for CLI with CKD (Ptrend = 0.01), but a reduction in hospitalizations for CLI without CKD (Ptrend = 0.01). Patients with CLI and CKD were less likely to undergo revascularization compared with patients without CKD. CLI with CKD had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (4.8% vs 2.5%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95% CI 1.93-2.11) and major amputation compared with no CKD. Revascularization for CLI with CKD was associated with lower rates of mortality (3.7% vs 5.3%, adjusted-OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.84) and major amputation compared with no revascularization. Compared with endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization for CLI with CKD was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (4.7% vs 2.7%, adjusted-OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.43-1.94). In conclusion, this contemporary observational analysis showed an increase in hospitalizations for CLI among patients with CKD. CLI with CKD was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with no CKD. Compared with endovascular therapy, surgical revascularization for CLI with CKD was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Rupture of aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery along with stenosis of the internal carotid and coronary arteries

This article presents the results of treatment of a patient with rupture of a giant intracerebral aneurysm of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA), hemodynamically significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery on the left and the trunk of the left coronary artery with multiple lesions of the coronary arteries (anterior descending artery, diagonal branch, right coronary artery). A phased surgical correction was performed, with the time period between stages being 2 months, as follows:Stage 1 — open microsurgical clipping of the aneurysm of the left MCA and removal of intracerebral hematoma. The usage of the standard treatment volume in the form of 3H therapy (hypertension, haemodilution and hypervolemia), as well as slow calcium channel blockers in the postoperative period, was associated with a high risk of developing cardiovascular complications due to the presence of occlusal–stenotic lesions of the coronary and brachiocephalic channels. In the postoperative period, the patient received antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg at lunch), lipid-lowering therapy (rosuvastatin 20 mg in the evening) and anti-hypertensive therapy (bisoprolol 2.5 mg in the morning; perindopril 2.5 mg in the evening; spironolactone 25 mg in the morning; torasemide 10 mg in the morning; valparin XP 500 mg 2 times a day). On day 14, the patient was transferred from the intensive care unit, and on day 20, the patient was discharged from the hospital in satisfactory condition.Stage 2 — a combined operation in the amount of carotid endarterectomy (CEE) with plastic surgery of the biological patch on the left with plastic reconstruction of the reconstruction zone with a patch from the xenopericardium and coronary bypass grafting (CABG). Tactics were confirmed as optimal, taking into account the stratification of the risk of complications in the postoperative period when applying the new interactive program ‘Program support for the decision-making process for choosing a surgical re-vascularisation strategy for multifocal atherosclerosis’ (certificate of registration of a computer program RU 2017619457). Brain protection during CEE was achieved by invasive measurement of retrograde pressure (60 % of systemic blood pressure (BP)) and intraoperative increase in blood pressure to 180/90 mm Hg. CABG was performed using cardiopulmonary bypass. An epiaortic ultrasound scan was used to select the position of the implantation of a venous shunt into the aortic wall. Intraoperative flowmetry was used to regulate the quality of the implanted shunts.The patient was discharged 10 days after the surgery from the hospital in satisfactory condition. Conservative therapy, initiated after stage 1 of re-vascularisation, was continued.Clipping of intracerebral arterial aneurysm during its rupture and reconstructive interventions on the internal carotid artery and coronary arteries could be performed combined with the possibility of endovascular correction. However, due to the presence of an unstable atherosclerotic plaque, the possibility of interventional correction of the internal carotid artery was excluded, and the condition of the coronary bed at the time of stage 1 remained unknown. An additional argument in favour of open microsurgical clipping of the aneurysm was the need for the removal of intracerebral hematoma.The treatment strategy chosen here was found to be safe and effective. Satisfactory outcome of the surgery was achieved due to a complete range of perioperative examinations. The implemented tactics prevented the development of complications. The data obtained here would form the basis for the development of recommendations for selecting the optimal tactics of re-vascularisation in combined lesions of intracranial, extracranial and coronary arteries. Received 21 April 2020. Revised 27 April 2020. Accepted 28 April 2020. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributionsConception and design: А.N. Kazantsev, R.S. TarasovLiterature review: K.P. Chernykh, N.E. Zarkua, R.Y. Leader, G.Sh. BagdavadzeDrafting the article: А.N. KazantsevIllustrations: А.N. Kazantsev, K.P. Chernykh, N.E. Zarkua, R.Y. Leader, G.Sh. BagdavadzeCritical revision of the article: N.E. Zarkua, R.S. Tarasov, Y.P. LinetsFinal approval of the version to be published: А.N. Kazantsev, R.S. Tarasov, K.P. Chernykh, N.E. Zarkua, R.Y. Leader, G.Sh. Bagdavadze, Y.P. Linets

Comparison of strategies for myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease and multivessel coronary artery disease

Justification. To this day, the problem of choosing the method of complete revascularization in the category of patients with acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation and multi-vascular lesions of the coronary bed does not lose its relevance. The goal of this study was to compare the results of surgical manipulations in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using 3rd-generation drug-coated stents and coronary artery bypass grafting, according to the two-year follow-up data.&#x0D; Methods. The results of surgical and endovascular revascularization strategies were compared in 140 patients with ischemic heart disease and multivessel coronary disease after previously successfully performed stenting of a clinically dependent artery using 3rd-generation drug-coated stents for acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation based on the results of a two-year follow-up.&#x0D; Results. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical, demographic and operational characteristics between the groups, except for the number of smoking patients, wich was significantly higher in the PCI group. In the PCI group, there was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of repeated revascularizations and the combined MACCE point.&#x0D; Discussion. The obtained results showed the advantage of CABG in a group of patients with previously successfully performed PCI of the clinically dependent artery for non -STEMI and multi-vascular lesions.&#x0D; Conclusion. In patients with coronary artery disease and multivascular lesions of the coronary bed, who had successfully underwent stenting of the clinical-dependent artery using stents of the 3rd generation with drug coating for acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation, and intermediate severity of lesions on the SYNTAX scale when performing full functional revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting, there are no differences in the indicators of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular disease, frequency of return of the clinic angina pectoris, with the exception of the frequency of repeated revascularization and composite MACCE points, which was statistically significantly higher in the group of stenting.

What will surgical coronary revascularization look like in 25 years?

Coronary artery bypass grafting evolved in incremental but significant steps since its introduction. Here, we provide an update on operative techniques, choice of conduits, patient selection/decision-making and primary and secondary prevention measures with potential of influencing the future of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Associated mortality of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) procedures performed in high-volume OPCAB centers (≥164 cases per year) and by experienced surgeons (≥48 cases per year) was reduced compared with on-pump CABG with two or more grafts suggesting a volume-based dependency of outcomes in CABG procedures with high-technical complexity. Ten-year results from the recent Arterial Revascularization Trial showed no significant between-group difference for the primary and secondary outcome. Total arterial revascularization using composite bilateral internal mammary artery-Y-conduits through a limited access mini-thoracotomy was not only shown to be feasible but a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent midterm outcomes. The most recent Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass (REGROUP) trial demonstrated no significant difference between open vein-graft harvesting and endoscopic vein-graft harvesting in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Adherence to the most recent guidelines on myocardial revascularization is a key component for providing state-of the CABG surgery. Trends to lesser invasiveness in surgical coronary revascularization will gain momentum and is expected - with further improvements - to be the mainstay of future surgical coronary revascularization strategies.

P5513Impact of fractional flow reserve on surgical coronary revascularization strategy

P5513Impact of fractional flow reserve on surgical coronary revascularization strategy

Conversion From Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been shown to be an effective strategy for surgical revascularization. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of intraoperative conversion from OPCAB to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) and report outcomes based on the reason for conversion. Starting in July 2007, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database captured patients that were planned OPCAB but then were converted to ONCAB. A total of 196,576 patients undergoing planned OPCAB within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database from July 2007 to June 2014 were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to their intraoperative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass: (1) planned conversion, (2) unplanned conversion for visualization, (3) unplanned conversion for hemodynamic instability, and (4) no conversion (OPCAB). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for conversion. The overall rate of conversion from OPCAB to ONCAB was 5.5%, with 49.6% of the conversions being planned. When compared with those not undergoing conversion (OPCAB, 30-day mortality observed to expected ratio [O/E], 0.8), those undergoing conversion to ONCAB experienced greater 30-day mortality regardless of etiology of conversion (planned conversion O/E, 1.4; unplanned conversion for visualization O/E, 1.6; and unplanned conversion for hemodynamic instability O/E, 2.7). Similar O/E ratios were observed for renal failure and prolonged ventilation following conversion. Logistic regression analysis showed advanced age, ejection fraction less than 35%, preoperative intraaortic balloon pump placement, increasing number of diseased coronary arteries, preoperative heart failure within 2 weeks, and urgent procedural status were all independent predictors for conversion to ONCAB (p ≤ 0.01). Intraoperative conversion from OPCAB to ONCAB remains a morbid event with a risk of mortality much higher than expected. Surgeons should consider elective ONCAB in those with a high risk for conversion during OPCAB.