Pulmonary thrombotic arteriopathy (PTA) can be an incidental finding in lung resections performed for various indications. Historic studies largely examined PTA in autopsies. Thus, the prevalence in surgical samples, particularly in the modern era of lung cancer screening, is poorly defined. Detection of PTA in surgical samples may provide an opportunity for therapeutic intervention, but the impact of this finding on clinical management is unknown. We retrospectively examined consecutive lung surgical resections containing a report of incidental PTA between 2019 and 2022 in our institution. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the history of systemic thromboembolism and clinical and radiographic follow-up. All slides were reviewed to morphologically characterize the vascular changes. Among 2930 pulmonary resections, 66 (2.3%) reportedly contained PTA. Twenty-four (36.4%) patients had a clinically recognized thromboembolic event either before or after surgical resection. Patients with clinically recognized thromboembolic disease were significantly more likely to have both acute and organized thrombi affecting large arteries. The presence of infarct, chronic hypertensive vasculopathy, or number of vessels with thrombi were not significantly associated with a clinically detected event. Reporting of incidental PTA led to clinical intervention in six patients and confirmed systemic thromboembolic disease in 2. Moreover, 2 patients with no further workup based on the incidental pathology findings subsequently developed pulmonary embolism. PTA is incidentally detected in 2.3% of surgical lung resections, and in two-thirds of cases, there is no clinical suspicion of thromboembolic disease. Pathologic reporting of PTA rarely led to clinical intervention, suggesting a need for improved communication of incidental pathology findings.