Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database Research Articles

Clinical factors associated with ultrashort length of stay in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease

BackgroundLength of stay (LOS) is a major driver of cost and resource utilization following lower extremity bypass (LEB). However, the variable comorbidity burden and mobility status of LEB patients makes implementing enhanced recovery after surgery pathways challenging. The aim of this study was to use a large national database to identify patient factors associated with ultrashort LOS among patients undergoing LEB for peripheral artery disease. MethodsAll patients undergoing LEB for peripheral artery disease in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2011 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the postoperative length of stay : ultrashort (≤2 days) and standard (>2 days). Thirty-day outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with ultrashort LOS. ResultsOverall, 17,510 patients were identified who underwent LEB, of which 2678 patients (15.3%) had an ultrashort postoperative LOS (mean, 1.8 days) and 14,832 (84.7%) patients had a standard LOS (mean, 7.1 days). When compared to patients with a standard LOS, patients with an ultrashort LOS were more likely to be admitted from home (95.9% vs 88.0%; P < .001), undergo elective surgery (86.1% vs 59.1%; P < .001), and be active smokers (52.1% vs 40.4%; P < .001). Patients with an ultrashort LOS were also more likely to have claudication as the indication for LEB (53.1% vs 22.5%; P < .001), have a popliteal revascularization target rather than a tibial/pedal target (76.7% vs 55.3%; P < .001), and have a prosthetic conduit (40.0% vs 29.9%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (1.4% vs 1.8%; P = .21); however, patients with an ultrashort LOS had a lower frequency of unplanned readmission (10.7% vs 18.8%; P < .001) and need for major reintervention (1.9% vs 5.6%; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, elective status (odds ratio , 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-3.04), active smoking (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30), and lack of vein harvest (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41-1.70) were associated with ultrashort LOS. Presence of rest pain (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63), tissue loss (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27-0.34), and totally dependent functional status (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84) were associated negatively with an ultrashort LOS. When examining the subgroup of patients who underwent vein harvest, totally dependent (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75) and partially dependent (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) functional status were persistently negatively associated with ultrashort LOS. ConclusionsUltrashort LOS (≤2 days) after LEB is uncommon but feasible in select patients. Preoperative functional status and mobility are important factors to consider when identifying LEB patients who may be candidates for early discharge.

Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction: A 6-year national surgical quality improvement (NSQIP) database analysis

BackgroundAnastomotic leak is a serious complication after esophagectomy that has been associated with worse outcomes. However, identifying patients at increased risk for anastomotic leak remains challenging. MethodsPatients were included from the 2016 to 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database who underwent elective esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for cancer. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic leak. ResultsA total of 4,331 patients were included in the study, of whom 647 patients experienced anastomotic leak (14.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed higher odds of anastomotic leak with smoking (adjusted odds ratio 1.24, confidence interval 1.02–1.51, P = .031), modified frailty index-5 score of 1 (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.19–1.75, P = .002) or 2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, confidence interval 1.19-1.94, P = .000), and a McKeown esophagectomy (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.16–1.80, P = .001). Each 1,000/μL increase in white blood cell count was associated with a 7% increase in odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, confidence interval 1.03–1.10, P = .0005). Higher platelet counts were slightly protective, and each 10,000/ μL increase in platelet count was associated with 2% reduced odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.97–0.99, P = .001). ConclusionIn this study, smoking status, frailty index, white blood cell count, McKeown esophagectomy, and platelet counts were all associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leak. These results can help to inform surgeons and patients of the true risk of developing anastomotic leak and potentially improve outcomes by providing evidence to improve preoperative characteristics, such as frailty.

General Versus Nongeneral Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Study on 25 000 Patients.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established treatment option for carotid stenosis. The choice between general anesthesia (GA) and nongeneral anesthesia (non-GA) during CEA remains a subject of debate, with concerns regarding perioperative complications, particularly myocardial infarctions. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes associated with GA vs non-GA CEA using a large, nationwide database. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried for patients undergoing CEA between 2013 and 2020. Primary outcome measures including surgical outcomes and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the 2 anesthesia methods, after 2:1 propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, a total of 25 356 patients (16 904 in the GA and 8452 in the non-GA group) were included. Non-GA compared with GA CEA was associated with significantly shorter operative times (101.9, 95% CI: 100.5-103.3 vs 115.8 95% CI: 114.4-117.2 minutes, P < .001), reduced length of hospital stays (2.3, 95% CI: 2.15-2.4 vs 2.5, 95% CI: 2.4-2.6 days, P < .001), and lower rates of 30-day postoperative complications, including myocardial infarctions (0.8% vs 1.2%, P = .003), unplanned intubations (0.8% vs 1.1%, P = .016), pneumonia (0.5% vs 1%, P < .001), and urinary tract infections (0.4% vs 0.7%, P = .003). These outcomes were notably more pronounced in the younger (≤70 years) and high morbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists 3-5) cohorts. In this nationwide registry-based study, non-GA CEA was associated with better short-term outcomes in terms of perioperative complications, compared with GA CEA. The findings suggest that non-GA CEA may be a safer alternative, especially in younger patients and those with more comorbidities.

Implementation of the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in surgical patients to decrease postsurgical venous thromboembolism and enoxaparin prescription at hospital discharge

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), has been an increasingly common post-surgical complication for surgical patients. In the United States, VTE has become a leading cause of preventable hospital death with more than half occurring after discharge and are directly linked to a recent (within 30 days) hospitalization or surgery [1]. In large, hospital-associated/acquired VTE (HA-VTE) are preventable through measures such as the use of risk stratification tools and chemoprophylaxis. The project institution, a community, academic, medical center, for multiple years has consistently remained a high outlier for postoperative VTE. Also, the choice of VTE chemoprophylaxis in surgical patients at the time of discharge depended on, and varied between, the individual prescribing physician. The goal was to implement and determine the efficacy of a standardized intervention tool, the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM), for reducing postoperative VTE complications and its influence on the physician's prescription of enoxaparin at discharge. Results: Risk assessment scoring pre-operatively increased from 0% baseline to 26.3% at Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle 1 and demonstrated a statistically significant change (p-value = 0.006). Risk assessment scoring pre-operatively was 42.9% by PDSA cycle 2 but was not statistically significantly different from PDSA cycle 1. Risk assessment scoring post-operatively (for eligible patients) remained the same throughout all three cycles at 0%. Appropriate prescription of anticoagulation declined from baseline (12.5%) to PDSA cycle 1 (0%), and improved at PDSA cycle 2 (33.3%), however no differences were significant (p-value 0.302). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database showed a decline in VTE occurrences at the projects institution from baseline (1.02%, 6 occurrences, 2021) to PDSA cycle 2 (0.92%, 4 occurrences, 2022) when compared to the national benchmark (1.0%) for the first time since 2018. Given the significant national problem HA-VTE pose to the public, and the rise in occurrences, this quality improvement (QI) project is clinically relevant.

Predictors of Failure to Rescue After Postoperative Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 13,047 Patients Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset

IntroductionDeath after suffering a postoperative complication (failure to rescue) is an area of concern, and its occurrence after postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is not well defined. We seek to identify the predictors of failure to rescue in patients who develop PRF. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing noncardiac surgery who developed PRF (postoperative unplanned intubation and receipt of mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 h) was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Predictors of failure to rescue after PRF were identified using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)–penalized variable selection method, with the Bayesian information criterion, in the context of a multiple logistic regression model (with Firth's bias correction). ResultsOf the 13,047 patients that formed our final evaluable study cohort, 3669 (28.1%) patients died within 30 days of surgery. We identified age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, presence of preoperative ascites, disseminated cancer, bleeding disorders, elevated preoperative creatinine, and low preoperative prealbumin levels as predictors of failure to rescue. The area under the curve for the final model was 0.6804, with a standard error of 0.0104 (95% CI area under the curve: 0.6600 to 0.7008). ConclusionsWe observed that almost 30% of patients that develop respiratory failure after noncardiac surgery die within 30 days of surgery. The validated eight-variable perioperative predictive model provides a risk estimate for death after PRF and may be useful for the purposes of preoperative planning, prognostication, decision making and resource allocation in patients who develop this complication.

The Obesity Paradox: A Nonlinear Relationship Between 30-Day Postoperative Complications and Body Mass Index After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

An inverse relationship coined the "obesity paradox" has been propositioned, in which body mass index (BMI) may be contradictorily protective in patients undergoing surgery or treatment of chronic disease. This study sought to investigate the BMI associated with the lowest rate of medical complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried to identify adults who underwent elective primary TSA between January 2012 and December 2020. Thirty-day postoperative medical complications were extracted, which included death, readmission, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, renal failure, and cardiac arrest, among others. BMI was classified into five categories (underweight [BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ], normal weight [BMI ≥18.5 and <25 kg/m 2 ], overweight [BMI ≥25 and <30 kg/m 2 ], obese [BMI ≥30 and <40 kg/m 2 ], and morbidly obese [BMI ≥40 kg/m 2 ]). We examined the risk of any 30-day postoperative complications and BMI categorically and on a continuous basis using multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, procedure year, and comorbidities. Of the 31,755 TSAs, 84% were White, 56% were female, and the average age of patients was 69.2 ± 9.3 years. Thirty-day postoperative medical complications occurred in 4.53% (n = 1,440). When assessed on a continuous basis, the lowest risk was in patients with a BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m 2 . Underweight individuals (BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ) had the highest postoperative complication rates overall. The probability of medical complications increased with age and was greater for female patients. The relationship between BMI and complication risk in TSA is nonlinear. A BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m 2 was associated with the lowest risk of medical complications after TSA, and BMI<18.5 kg/m 2 had the highest risk overall, indicating some protective aspects of BMI against 30-day medical complications. Thus, obesity alone should not preclude patients from TSA eligibility, rather surgical candidacy should be evaluated in the context of patients' overall health and likelihood of benefit from TSA. III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Trends and Prediction of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Spine Surgery: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an infrequent but costly complication after elective spine surgery. Identification of important temporal changes and predictive factors may inform targeted prevention efforts. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of elective spine surgery patients was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programs (NSQIP) database from 2011 and 2019. Temporal changes in SSI and related factors were examined descriptively. Recursive partitioning and bootstrap forest techniques were used to inform the development of predictive models for SSI. Results: A total of 6,038 (1.66%) of 363,754 patients had an SSI recorded. Peri-operative transfusion and preoperative anemia decreased over the nine-year period, however, obesity and diabetes mellitus increased, whereas the SSI rate remained essentially unchanged. A full model including 15 variables had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.693 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686-0.700) whereas a reduced model with just nine variables had an AUC of 0.690 (95% CI, 0.683-0.697). Adjusted odd ratios (aOR) greater than two were noted for only three variables; a posterior approach (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 (aOR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.39-2.90), and surgical duration longer than 350 minutes (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.14-2.67). Remaining retained variables included albumin <3.5 g/dL, inpatient procedure, peri-operative transfusion, diabetes mellitus (both insulin/non-insulin), anemia, and smoking. Conclusions: Surgical site infection rate remained unchanged over a nine-year period despite the lower rates of allogeneic blood transfusion. Class 3 obesity, long operative times, and a posterior approach mainly for thoracic/lumbar spine procedures seemed more pragmatic, but their predictive performance was only modest in our prediction models for SSI.

Comparison of Outcomes in Below-Knee Amputation Between Vascular, General, and Orthopedic Surgeons

IntroductionGeneral surgeons (GS), orthopedic surgeons (OS), and vascular surgeons (VS) can perform below-knee amputation (BKA) operations. We compared the outcomes of BKA patients among the three specialties. MethodsAdult patients who underwent a BKA were identified from the 2016–2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Statistical data for orthopedic and vascular BKA cases were then compared with GS cases using logistic regression analysis. Outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, and complications. ResultsThere were 9619 BKA cases. VS had the highest volume of BKA with 58.9% of the cases, compared to GS at 22.9% and OS at 18.1%. 4.4% of general surgery patients had severe frailty compared to OS (3.3%) and VS (3.4%, P < 0.001). VS has the lowest rates of emergency cases (11.9% versus 16.1 for GS versus 15.8% versus OS) and the most favorable wound classification (38.3%, versus 48.7% for GS and VS). Peripheral vascular disease was notably highest in VS (34.0% versus. 20.6% for GS and 9.9% for OS, P < 0.001). Compared to GS, VS was more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (odds ratio) (OR)(1.409), 95% CI 1.265-1.570) while OS was less likely (OR 0.650, 95% CI 0.561-0.754). OS had a lower risk of complications (OR 0.781, 95% CI 0.674-0.904). Mortality was not significantly different among the three specialties. ConclusionsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Project retrospective analysis of BKA cases suggested that mortality was not statistically different when performed by VS, GS, and OS. There were fewer overall complications when OS performed a BKA, but this is more likely a result of operating upon a generally healthier patient population with lower incidence of preoperative comorbid conditions.

Factors Associated with Perioperative Transfusions in Veterans.

Background: Private sector literature demonstrates an association between perioperative transfusions and poor clinical outcomes. Hemostatic agents, surgeon training, and patient blood management programs (PBMPs) may mitigate perioperative bleeding. This study attempts to identify preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative transfusions in Veterans. Study Design and Methods: This study is a retrospective review of the prospectively maintained Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Included patients were older than 18 years and underwent noncardiac surgery between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021. Data collected included demographics, surgery variables, preoperative clinical variables, postoperative outcomes, and perioperative transfusions. Cohorts were created based on transfusion status. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to characterize the similarities, differences, and potential predictors of perioperative transfusion. Results: Of 6108 patients included, 153 patients received perioperative transfusions. The risks for transfusion included older age, male sex, black race, smoking, and low body mass index (BMI). The highest percent of transfused patients underwent vascular (43.4%), orthopedic (22%), and general surgeries (20%). Transfusion increased risk for postoperative cerebral vascular accident (P = .041) and 30-day mortality (P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed American Society of Anesthesiology class, chemotherapy within 30 days, increased age, tobacco smoking, and decreased BMI were predictive of perioperative transfusions. Discussion: Perioperative transfusions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the Veteran population. These retrospective data describe the complex relationships between perioperative transfusions and outcomes after noncardiac surgery. These results serve as a foundation to create predictive models and PBMP within the veteran population to decrease transfusion requirements and associated complications.

Rates of surgical site infections and length of stay following major gynecologic oncology surgery for patients on federally funded insurance: A 6-month retrospective cohort.

e18627 Background: An estimated 94,000 women have newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer annually–with rates increasing over the last 20 years. The incidence of gynecologic cancers is known to vary by insurance status; more specifically, uninsured or federally insured women are more likely to have advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis and worse overall survival compared to privately insured women. Surgical site infections (SSIs) complicate up to 4% of hysterectomies in the United States. Other post-operative sequelae, such as wound dehiscence and 30-day readmission, further complicate the post-surgical course. We sought to determine differences in postoperative outcomes for patients with private and federally-funded insurance plans, such as SSI, length of hospital stay, and 30-day wound dehiscence, and 30 all-cause readmission following gynecologic oncologic surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a large metropolitan academic health system between January 1st, 2022, to June 30th, 2022. The study population included adult women who received gynecologic oncologic surgery–surgical staging or interval cytoreduction. Postoperative complications were compared to national rates from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Trends were analyzed using chi-squared analysis and a two-sample t-test. Results: Over our 6-month study period, 233 patients underwent gynecologic oncologic surgery. Robotic-assisted hysterectomies were the most common (27.89%, n = 65), followed by total abdominal hysterectomies (21%, n = 49), laparoscopic hysterectomies (7.72%, n = 18), and supracervical hysterectomies (3%, n = 7). More patients required bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (63.51%, n = 148) compared to unilateral procedures (9.87%, n = 23). Although most patients had private insurance (73.39%, n = 171), 26.1% had federally-funded health plans (n = 62)–Medicaid and Medicare. Rates of wound dehiscence were higher than the NSQIP rate of 1% among our cohort (3%, n = 7). Although there was a high rate of 30-day readmission (9.44%, n = 22) compared to NSQIP rate of 6.1%, the incidence of SSI was fewer than the NSQIP rate of 4% (3.86%, n = 9). Upon intersectional analysis, patients with federal insurance plans had higher rates of SSI (n = 5, p &lt; 0.05). Specifically, Medicare patients had a longer average length of stay at 2.64 days (p &lt; 0.05) compared to a study average of 1.76 days. Conclusions: Patients with federal insurance had longer hospital stays and higher rates of SSI compared to those with private plans. There was no difference in 30-day wound dehiscence or 30-day all-cause readmission between study populations. More studies are needed to risk-stratify patients by insurance type before gynecologic oncology surgery to improve postoperative outcomes further.

18. Pedicled Flaps for High-risk Open Vascular Procedures of the Lower Extremity: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Database

18. Pedicled Flaps for High-risk Open Vascular Procedures of the Lower Extremity: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Database

Race and sex demographics in the surgical management of facial nerve palsy.

Facial palsy affects patients of all backgrounds, yet no existing studies describe differences in its treatment patterns between demographic groups. We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database to investigate whether race and sex disparities exist in facial reanimation surgery. Patients were identified using CPT codes corresponding to facial-nerve procedures. Seven hundred sixty-one patients met criteria; 681 self-identified as White (89.5%), 51 as Black (6.7%), 43 as Hispanic (5.6%), 23 as Asian (3.0%), and 5 patients as other (0.61%). White patients were more than twice as likely to undergo brow ptosis repair than Non-White patients (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.16-6.15, p = .03). After controlling for malignancy, men had longer operative times than women (480.2 vs. 413.9 min, p = .04) and higher likelihood of free tissue transfer (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.9-9.8), fascial free tissue transfer (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.1-195), and ectropion repair (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8). Most patients undergoing facial reanimation surgery in the United States are White. Men have longer operative times and a higher likelihood of undergoing free fascial grafts and cutaneous and fascial free tissue transfer than women regardless of malignancy status. 2c.

MP07-04 OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS FOR SACROCOLPOPEXIES PERFORMED BY UROLOGY VS GYNECOLOGY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP07-04 OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS FOR SACROCOLPOPEXIES PERFORMED BY UROLOGY VS GYNECOLOGY Rishabh Simhal, Kerith Wang, Maria D'Amico, Courtney Capella, Radhika Ragam, Yash Shah, Joon Yau Leong, Whitney Smith, Patrick Shenot, and Alana Murphy Rishabh SimhalRishabh Simhal More articles by this author , Kerith WangKerith Wang More articles by this author , Maria D'AmicoMaria D'Amico More articles by this author , Courtney CapellaCourtney Capella More articles by this author , Radhika RagamRadhika Ragam More articles by this author , Yash ShahYash Shah More articles by this author , Joon Yau LeongJoon Yau Leong More articles by this author , Whitney SmithWhitney Smith More articles by this author , Patrick ShenotPatrick Shenot More articles by this author , and Alana MurphyAlana Murphy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003222.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Sacrocolpopexies (SCP) are performed by both urologists and gynecologists; however, the majority are performed by gynecologists. We aim to elucidate if there is a difference in patient demographics and surgical outcomes based on surgeon specialty. METHODS: Open and minimally invasive SCPs performed between 2006-2020 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database using CPTs 57280 and 57425. Frailty was calculated using the NSQIP modified frailty index (mFI-5), a previously validated 5-item score including points for diabetes, functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and hypertension, and the revised surgical Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev), a validated score which accounts for patient comorbidities, age, and functional status. Univariate analysis was performed using student’s t-test and Pearson’s chi-square to compare operative parameters, patient frailty and demographics, surgical outcomes, and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 8,944 SCPs from 2006-2020. Gynecology performed 81% of cases, and urology performed 19% (p<.001). Urologists tended to perform more minimally invasive cases compared to gynecologists (84% vs 77%, p<.001). Between urologists and gynecologists, there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes, minor complications (surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bleeding, or acute kidney injury), major complications (deep vein thrombosis, stroke, renal failure, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, septic shock, deep wound infections, or cardiac arrest), 30-day reoperations, 30-day hospital readmissions, nor 30-day mortality. However, urology patients tended to be older (65 vs 61 years, p<.001) and frailer by mFI-5 (0.7 vs 0.5, p<.001, higher score indicating more frailty) and RAI-rev (19.4 vs 17.1, p<.001, higher score indicating more frailty). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in 30-day surgical outcomes for SCPs performed by urologists compared to gynecologists. However, urologists tend to perform more minimally invasive procedures and operate on older, more frail patients. This finding highlights differences in practice patterns between two specialties and warrants further studies. Source of Funding: n/a © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e85 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rishabh Simhal More articles by this author Kerith Wang More articles by this author Maria D'Amico More articles by this author Courtney Capella More articles by this author Radhika Ragam More articles by this author Yash Shah More articles by this author Joon Yau Leong More articles by this author Whitney Smith More articles by this author Patrick Shenot More articles by this author Alana Murphy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Modified Frailty Index Identifies Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications in Geriatric Patients After Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Distal Radius and Ulna Fractures: Analysis of 5654 Geriatric Patients, From the 2005 to 2017 the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database.

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius and ulnar fractures (DRUFs) is one of the most common fracture surgeries for hand surgeons. Few studies have evaluated how frailty contributes to outcomes in geriatric hand surgery patients. This study hypothesizes that geriatric patients scoring higher on the modified Frailty Index 5 (mFI-5) are at greater risk of postoperative complications following DRUF fixation. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was reviewed for ORIF for DRUFs from 2005 to 2017. Statistically significant differences for demographics, comorbidities, mFI-5, and postoperative complications between geriatric and nongeriatric patients were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 17,097 ORIF for DRUFs were collected by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project 2005-2017, with 5654 patients older than 64 years (33.2%). Average age for geriatric patients undergoing ORIF for DRUFs was 73.7 years. Within geriatric patients, an mFI-5 score >2 confers 1.6-times increased risk of returning to the operating room following ORIF for DRUF (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; P = 0.02), whereas an increase in mFI-5 score >2 confers a 3.2-times increased risk of deep vein thrombosis among geriatrics (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2 P < 048). Frailty among geriatric patients confers increased risk of deep vein thrombosis postoperatively. Geriatric patients with higher frailty scores carry a significantly increased risk of returning to the operating room within 30 days. Hand surgeons can use the mFI-5 to screen geriatric patients with DRUF patients to guide perioperative decision-making.

Pain severity scale: A methodology for classifying postoperative pain severity by surgical procedure

BackgroundAcute postoperative pain is common following many types of surgery, and a significant subset of patients experience severe pain, which can be difficult to manage and result in postoperative complications. Opioid agonists are commonly used to treat severe postoperative pain, but their use has been associated with adverse outcomes. This retrospective study uses data from the Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP) database to develop a postoperative Pain Severity Scale (PSS) based on subjective pain reports and postoperative opioid requirements. MethodsPostoperative pain scores and opioid prescription data were extracted from the VASQIP database for surgeries occurring between 2010 and 2020. Procedures were grouped by surgical Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and a total of 165,321 surgical procedures were examined, representing 1141 distinct CPT codes. K-means clustering analysis was used to group the surgeries based on 24-h maximum pain, 72-h average pain, and postoperative opioid prescriptions. ResultsK-means clustering analysis showed two optimal grouping strategies; one with 3 and the other with 5 groups. Both clustering strategies produced a PSS that categorized surgical procedures with generally increasing pain scores and opioid requirements. The 5-group PSS accurately captured typical postoperative pain experience across a range of procedures. ConclusionsK-means clustering produced a Pain Severity Scale that can distinguish typical postoperative pain for a large variety of surgical procedures based on subjective and objective clinical data. The PSS will facilitate research into the optimal postoperative pain management and could be used in the development of clinical decision support tools.

Perioperative outcomes of radical prostatectomy for advanced stage, node positive, and metastatic prostate cancer.

270 Background: Historically, surgical management with radical prostatectomy (RP) has been a definitive treatment option only for localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, recent studies suggest an overall survival benefit to treating the primary tumor with radiation therapy in metastatic PCa (mPCa). Therefore, RP may have a role in treating mPCa, but the perioperative safety of that remains unclear. Here, we aim to compare the perioperative outcomes of RP for locally advanced, node positive, and metastatic PCa using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Methods: RPs performed between 2019-2020 were identified in NSQIP and the corresponding Prostatectomy-Targeted Participant Use File. Cases were grouped into six distinct categories: T1N0M0-T2N0M0; T3N0M0; T4N0M0; T1-3N1M0; T4N1M0; and T1-4N0-1M1. Baseline age, race, and medical comorbidities were compared between the groups. Patients were then further grouped into T1-2N0M0 versus T3-4N0M0 cases to compare the effect of locally advanced disease, TanyN1M0 versus TanyN0M0 to compare the effect of node-positivity, and TanyN0M1 versus TanyN0M0 to compare the effect of metastases. 30-day outcomes, operative time, hospital length-of-stay, 30-day mortality, readmissions, reoperations, major complications, minor complications, and surgery-specific complications were compared between groups. Results: Pathologic staging was available for 5,248 RPs. Baseline demographics were largely similar, with the exceptions of increased Black race, diabetes, and smoking in the node-positive-group and increased age in the T4 group. There was a slightly higher rate of minor complications in the locally advanced (T3-4N0M0) versus localized (T1-2N0M0) group, but no significant difference in major complications, 30-day mortality, readmissions, or rectal injuries. In comparison to node-negative patients (T1-4N0M0), node-positivity (T1-4N1M0) was associated with longer operative time, LOS, and incidence of 30-day renal failure, but was otherwise not associated with a higher rate of any complication. Compared to non-metastatic cases (T1-4N0M0), metastatic cases (T1-4N0M1) were associated with a higher rate of bleeding, prolonged-NG-tube use, ureteral obstruction, and LOS. Conclusions: RP for patients with locally advanced, node positive, and metastatic prostate cancer appears to be safe; it is not associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality or major complications compared to RP for localized prostate cancer. Given the potential survival benefit in treating the primary tumor in advanced disease, there may be a role for RP in treating patients with advanced PCa.

Frailty, Age, ASA Classification, and BMI on Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Fracture ORIF.

To assess how traditional, simple markers of health independently affect postoperative morbidity of mandibular fracture open reduction-internal fixations (ORIFs). Cohort study. National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Database. The 2005 to 2017 NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent mandibular ORIF. To control for the severity of the trauma, an additional "concurrent surgery" variable was created. A modified 5-item frailty index was calculated based on the following: presurgery-dependentfunctional status, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of congestive heart failure. Among 1806 patients with mandibular ORIFs (mean age 34.8 ± 15.4 years), modified frailty index (mFI) was associated with 30-day medical complications (p < .001), reoperation (p < .001), and readmission (p = .005) on univariate analysis. Increased age was associated with prolonged hospitalization (p < .001) and medical complications (p < .001). The increased American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was associated with all endpoints (p ≤ .003), while increased body mass index (BMI) was associated with none. On multivariate analysis, only increased ASA was associated with any adverse event (reference: ASA 1; ASA 2,odds ratio [OR]: 2.17 [95% confidence interval, CI: 2.17-3.71], p = .004; ASA 3-4, OR: 3.63 [95% CI: 1.91-6.91], p < .001). Similarly, mFI and BMI were not independently associated with prolonged hospitalization (≥2 days) (p ≥ .015), but 65+ age (reference: 18-49; OR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.40-3.86], p = .001) and ASA 3 to 4 groups (reference: ASA 1; OR: 3.26 [95% CI: 2.06-5.14], p < .001) were. ASA status and age are more useful modalities than mFI or BMI in predicting poor postoperative morbidity in mandibular ORIF. These simple metrics can assist with managing surgeons' expectations for mandibular ORIF patients.

Severe Obesity Worsens 30-Day Surgical Outcomes and Projected Costs in Operative Femoral Shaft and Tibial Shaft Fractures.

To assess the impact of severe obesity on 30-day adverse event rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and projected costs after operative fixation of tibia and femur fractures. An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2012 to 2019 of isolated femoral shaft and tibial shaft fracture fixation cases was conducted. Adverse events, LOS, readmission rates, and operative time were queried for severe obesity, defined as body mass index greater than 40, compared with other patients. Student t tests were used to assess continuous variables. Fisher exact test and odds ratios were used for categorical variables. A cost-analysis was also performed to quantify the effect of severe obesity on projected health care expenditures. A total of 10,436 patients were included with 7.0% of patients categorized as severely obese. Severely obese patients had higher infectious complication rates (9.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.013, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78), readmission rates (7.9% vs. 5.6%, P-value = 0.008, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.91), longer LOS (5.8 days SD ±10.2 vs. 5.0 days SD ±7.9 days, P-value = 0.008), and longer operative times (mean 115 minutes ± 56 minutes SD vs. 103 minutes SD ±54 minutes, P-value = <0.001). Severe obesity resulted in an estimated $4258.07 additional health care expenditures per patient compared with nonobese patients. This amounted to a projected added total expenditure of $3.09 million USD in the overall cohort. Severe obesity is associated with significantly worse 30-day outcomes and higher readmission rates for patients undergoing operative fixation of tibial shaft and femoral shaft fractures. Health policy considerations should be made to incentivize care for this patient population, particularly in trauma where modification of risk factors before surgery is often not feasible. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Regional versus general anesthesia in knee arthroplasty in patients with different classes of BMI: A matched analysis of the NSQIP database

BackgroundKnee arthroplasty for knee arthritis is a commonly performed surgery yielding excellent functional results and good pain relief. It is associated with post-surgical complications according to the type of anesthesia and BMI class. MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for the years 2005–2012 for patients >18 years of age who underwent knee arthroplasty, condyle and plateau, medial and/or lateral compartment. The surgical site complications, bleeding occurrences necessitating transfusion, unplanned readmissions, and mortality stratified according to anesthesia type and BMI class over a period of 30-days were examined. ResultsA total of 78,275 patients were included for analysis; regional anesthesia showed a consistent protective effect from surgical site complications more prominent with increasing obesity class with respective ORs and their corresponding 95% CI for pre-obesity, class I, II, and III obesity being 0.95 [0.89–1.09], 0.75 [0.68–0.83], 0.64 [0.57–0.72], and 0.61 [0.54–0.7]. ConclusionsHigher BMI values are a protective factor for the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Moreover, regional anesthesia is the preferred choice of anesthesia as well if postoperative complications are considered. A significant decrease in the rate of post-operative blood transfusions was seen in patients with high BMI and regional anesthesia.

IBCOx-15 Bariatric surgery in patients with BMI greater than 70: analysis of the ACSNSQIP database

Abstract Background Bariatric surgery offers patients short- and long-term benefits to their health and quality of life. Currently, we see more patients with superior body mass index (BMI) looking for these benefits. Evidence-based medicine is integral in the evaluation of risks versus benefit; however, data are lacking in this high-risk population. Objectives To assess the morbidity and mortality of patients with BMI 70 undergoing bariatric surgery. Setting University Hospital, Bronx, New York, USA using national database. Methods Using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database for years 2005 to 2016, we identified patients who underwent primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients with BMI ≥70 were assigned to the BMI ≥ 70 (BMI70+) cohort and less obese patients were assigned to the BMI &amp;lt; 70 (U70) cohort. Length of stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality were compared. Results A total of 163,413 patients underwent non-revisional bariatric surgery. Of those, 2322 had a BMI ≥ 70. BMI70+ was associated with increased mortality (0.4% versus 0.1%, P 5.0001), deep vein thrombosis (0.6% versus 0.3%, P 5.007), pulmonary (1.9% versus 0.5%, P 5.0001), renal (0.9% versus 0.2%, P 5.0001), and infectious complications (1.1% versus .4%, P 5 .0001). BMI 70+ patients had longer mean length of stay (2.6 versus 2.1 d, P 5.0001) and operative time (126.1 versus 114.5 min, P 5.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of myocardial infarctions (0.1% versus 0.1%, P 5.319), pulmonary embolisms (0.3% versus 0.2%, P 5.596), and transfusion requirements (0.1% versus 0.1%, P 5.105) between groups. Conclusions Evaluation of risk and benefit is performed on a case-by-case basis, but evidence-based medicine is critical in empowering surgeons and patients to make informed decisions. The overall rate of morbidity and mortality for BMI 701+ patients undergoing bariatric surgery was increased over U70 patients but was still relatively low. Our study will allow surgeons to incorporate objective data into their assessment of risk for super-obese patients pursuing bariatric surgery.