Surgical Closure Of Left Atrial Appendage Research Articles

Innovative Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technique: Early Experience of Inverted Spiral Closure Technique.

Simultaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) during cardiac procedures has become a common preventive measure against cardiogenic embolic events associated with atrial fibrillation. However, this strategy encounters limitations during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right minithoracotomy because access to the LAA is limited. The use of endocardial sutures for surgical exclusion of the LAA is also well established but has a notable rate of closure failure. We introduced a new surgical LAA closure technique called the inverted spiral closure technique (ISCT). Between July 2020 and August 2021, 26 patients underwent LAA closure with ISCT concomitant to mitral valve surgery in our hospital. Early postoperative outcomes and any stroke or thromboembolic event during the follow-up were evaluated. Transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was used to assess LAA patency. The ISCT procedure was performed successfully in all cases. No significant persistent flow between the left atrium and LAA was observed on intraoperative TEE. During a median follow-up of 1.1 years, no patients experienced stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Postoperative echocardiography showed no significant residual flow within the LAA. One patient was incidentally found to have recanalization between the left atrium and LAA several months after surgery on an enhanced computed tomography scan during coronary evaluation. The ISCT can be performed reliably through the same left atriotomy for mitral valve surgery and is a useful and effective technique for surgical LAA exclusion. There are still not enough patients and modalities for postoperative evaluation.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Technique for Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Technique for Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status and perspectives.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, and the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been identified as a principal source of thromboembolism in these patients. While oral anticoagulation is the current standard of care, LAA closure (LAAC) emerges as an alternative or complementary treatment approach to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Moderate-sized randomized clinical studies have provided data for the efficacy and safety of catheter-based LAAC, largely compared with vitamin K antagonists. LAA device iterations, advances in pre- and peri-procedural imaging, and implantation techniques continue to increase the efficacy and safety of LAAC. More data about efficacy and safety of LAAC have been collected, and several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to compare LAAC with best medical care (including non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants) in different clinical settings. Surgical LAAC in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery reduced the risk of stroke on background of anticoagulation therapy in the LAAOS III study. In this review, we describe the rapidly evolving field of LAAC and discuss recent clinical data, ongoing studies, open questions, and current limitations of LAAC.

The left atrial appendage closure by surgery 2 trial: statistical analysis plan for a randomized multicenter trial exploring if the closure of the left atrial appendage during open-heart surgery reduces stroke irrespective of patients’ stroke risk and preoperative atrial fibrillation status

BackgroundSurgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure concomitant to open-heart surgery prevents thromboembolism in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, high-level evidence does not exist for LAA closure performed in patients with any CHA2DS2-VASc score and preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) status—the current trial attempts to provide such evidence.MethodsThe study is designed as a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessor, multicenter trial of adult patients undergoing first-time elective open-heart surgery. Patients with and without AF and any CHA2DS2-VASc score will be enrolled. The primary exclusion criteria are planned LAA closure, planned AF ablation, or ongoing endocarditis. Before randomization, a three-step stratification process will sort patients by site, surgery type, and preoperative or expected oral anticoagulation treatment. Patients will undergo balanced randomization (1:1) to LAA closure on top of the planned cardiac surgery or standard care. Block sizes vary from 8 to 16. Neurologists blinded to randomization will adjudicate the primary outcome of stroke, including transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcomes include a composite outcome of stroke, including TIA, and silent cerebral infarcts, an outcome of ischemic stroke, including TIA, and a composite outcome of stroke and all-cause mortality. LAA closure is expected to provide a 60% relative risk reduction. In total, 1500 patients will be randomized and followed for 2 years.DiscussionThe trial is expected to help form future guidelines within surgical LAA closure. This statistical analysis plan ensures transparency of analyses and limits potential reporting biases.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT03724318. Registered 26 October 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03724318.Protocol versionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.003.

Incidence of Acute Thrombosis After Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundThe clinical implications of acute phase thrombosis after surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure remain unclear. This study sought to determine the frequency, prognosis, and factors involved in thrombogenesis after surgical LAA occlusion. MethodsIn this study, data from patients who underwent 2 types of standalone surgical LAA closure (either resection or clipping) between July 2014 and March 2020 at a single center were analyzed. ResultsA total of 239 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation underwent minimally invasive standalone surgical LAA occlusion (184 resection cases and 55 clipping cases). On postoperative day 2, electrocardiogram synchronized contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed in 223 cases (93.3%), and echocardiography follow-up was performed in 16 cases when CT was contraindicated. Acute postoperative thrombus on the closed stump was detected in 35 cases (14.7%), of which 29 cases (15.8%) belonged to the resection group and 6 cases (10.9%) belonged to the clipping group. No significant difference was detected between the groups, and no significant predictors of acute-phase thrombosis were found. Thromboembolism occurred in 4 patients before postoperative imaging follow-up, and there was no evidence of thrombi in these patients on postoperative day 2 CT. Three months after the first CT, thrombi were no longer detected in 34 of 35 patients (97.1%). ConclusionsThrombosis can occur after surgical LAA occlusion. Although the clinical significance is yet unclear, it may be reasonable to continue anticoagulation therapy until a lack of thrombosis is confirmed, unless there are contraindications.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: What Do We Know?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States and the most common cause of embolic cerebrovascular events, with the majority of these thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has separate developmental, ultrastructural, and physiological characteristics from the left atrium. Although LAA anatomy is highly variable, it can be categorized into 4 types: cactus, cauliflower, chicken wing, and windsock. The cauliflower type is associated with higher stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular AF. Although the cornerstone of therapy to prevent embolic strokes from AF has been anticoagulation with thrombin inhibitors, a large group of patients are unable to tolerate anticoagulation due to bleeding. This has led to the development and advancement of multiple surgical and percutaneous LAA closure devices to prevent embolic cerebrovascular accidents without the need for anticoagulation. In this article, we discuss the outcomes of major studies that utilized surgical LAA occlusion and its effectiveness. Furthermore, we summarize nonsurgical methods of LAA closure and future directions regarding LAA closure.

Subocclusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery During Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Subocclusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery During Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Different Techniques of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Their Efficacy: A Systematic Review.

Atrial fibrillation has been identified as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events. Since 1948 different surgical techniques have described the feasibility and the rationale of left atrial surgical appendage closure. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the reported patency rates of different surgical techniques. This systematic review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent investigators searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OVID® (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) to identify relevant studies. Consecutively, a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) strategy assessment of literature was performed to search eventual other relevant studies that may have been ignored. A total of 42 studies were included in our analysis. The total number of patients who underwent surgical left atrial appendage closure was 5671, and in 61.2% an imaging follow up was performed, mostly with transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation. Success rate for the different techniques was: Clip deployment 98%; Lariat procedure 88%; Surgical amputation 91%; Endocardial suture 74.3%, Epicardial suture 65%; Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) ligation 60.9%; Stapler technique with excision of left atrial appendage (LAA) 100%; Stapler without excision 70%. To date, data on surgical left atrial appendage closure are poor and not standardized, even if reported rates are acceptable and comparable to transcatheter procedures. If validated on large-scale non-retrospective and multicentric studies, these promising developments may offer a valuable alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ineligible for oral anticoagulation therapy.

Abstract 14411: Transcatheter Closure of Residual Leak Using Gore Cardioform Occluder After Failed Surgical Ligation of Left Atrial Appendage

Introduction: In non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most common site for thromboembolic formation. The current recommendation is that patients with afib and a CHA2DS2-VASC risk score >2 who undergo cardiac surgery should simultaneously have surgical left atrial appendage closure (Grade 1b). A rare complication that can occur includes incomplete LAA surgical closure with the residual leak, leading to an increased risk of stroke or thromboembolic events. We present two cases with residual leaks on follow-up after surgical ligation of LAA. Methods: Two patients aged 75 to 80 years old with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, surgical mitral valve repair, and surgical left atrial appendage ligation underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to evaluate the LAA. The CHA2DS2-VASC risk score was 3 for both patients. There was evidence of a residual leak greater than 5 mm between the left atrium and left atrial appendage. Results: Given the residual leak and risk scores, both patients had an increased risk of stroke. Therefore both patients underwent successful transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage using a 20 mm Gore CARDIOFORM occluder. TEE was used to confirm no residual color flow and confirmed complete closure of the defects. Patients were continued on oral anticoagulation (DOAC) for six weeks with the plan to switch to antiplatelets. Conclusions: Studies have shown that surgical ligation of LAA can result in a residual leak which can increase the risk of systemic embolization. Following failed surgical ligation of LAA, transcatheter closure of residual leak with Gore CARDIOFORM occluder may be a safe and effective strategy for management. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of utilizing a septal occluder device in patients with residual leaks due to failed surgical ligation of LAA.

Impact of surgical left atrial appendage closure during coronary bypass on clinical outcomes and readmissions

Abstract Background Whether surgical left atrial appendage closure (sLAAC) during coronary artery bypass (CABG)surgery improves post-operative outcome including stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence is largely unknown. Objective To analyze the impact of concomitant sLAAC during CABG in terms of outcomes and readmissions over the following year. Methods We analyzed the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016–2019) using ICD-10 codes to identify hospitalizations for CABG. Patients were subcategorized based on whether sLAAC was performed or not. Among patients who survived their index admission, we employed propensity matching (1:3) to adjust for age, sex, comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc scores, previous AF history, heart failure and hospital characteristics. Primary outcomes included unplanned AF and stroke-related readmissions at 1 year. Results A total of 58,311 patients with CABG and sLAAC were identified with 175,940 propensity matched controls. Patients undergoing sLAAC were older with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores and comorbidity burdens. Confounders were well balanced following propensity matching. Over a mean follow-up of 152 days, sLAAC was associated with higher risk of readmission due to AF at one year (HR 1.71 [1.49–1.96] p<0.001). This association is independent of previous AF history. Lower rates of stroke-related readmission was associated with perfomance of sLAAC (HR 0.80 (0.65–0.97) p=0.026), however the association was not observed when accounting for AF history. Conclusion CABG with concomitant sLAAC is maybe associated with lower stroke risk at the cost of higher risk of AF readmissions. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Randomized Trial of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Protection Against Cerebrovascular Events

Following open-heart surgery, atrial fibrillation and stroke occur frequently. Left atrial appendage closure added to elective open-heart surgery could reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. We aim to examine if routine closure of the left atrial appendage in patients undergoing open-heart surgery provides long-term protection against cerebrovascular events independently of atrial fibrillation history, stroke risk, and oral anticoagulation use. Long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in the prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded evaluation trial entitled left atrial appendage closure by surgery (NCT02378116). Patients were stratified by oral anticoagulation status and randomized (1:1) to left atrial appendage closure in addition to elective open-heart surgery vs standard care. The primary composite endpoint was ischemic stroke events, transient ischemic attacks, and imaging findings of silent cerebral ischemic lesions. Two neurologists blinded for treatment assignment adjudicated cerebrovascular events. In total, 186 patients (82% males) were reviewed. At baseline, mean (standard deviation (SD)) age was68 (9) years and 13.4% (n=25/186) had been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] CHA2DS2-VASc was 3 [2,4] and 25.9% (n = 48/186) were receiving oral anticoagulants. Mean follow-up was 6.2 (2.5) years. The left atrial appendage closure group experienced fewer cerebrovascular events; intention-to-treat 11 vs 19 (P=0.033, n = 186) and per-protocol 9 vs 17 (P=0.186, n = 141). Left atrial appendage closure as an add-on open-heart surgery, regardless of pre-surgery atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulation status, seems safe and may reduce cerebrovascular events in long-term follow-up. More extensive randomized clinical trials investigating left atrial appendage closure in patients without atrial fibrillation and high stroke risk are warranted.

Characteristics of non-valvular atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage thrombus who are undergoing appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy.

We investigated the characteristics of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and left atrial (LA) appendage (LAA) thrombus who had been given appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. We studied 737 NVAF patients who were scheduled for catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion. All patients received appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy for at least 3weeks prior to echocardiography in accordance with the guidelines. Whether LAA thrombus was present or absent on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was determined by at least three senior echocardiologists. LAA thrombi were observed in 22 patients (3.0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LAA flow and LA volume index were both independent predictors of LAA thrombus formation; however, LAA flow (≤ 18cm/s) was indicated as a more powerful predictor. Moreover, the prevalence of LAA thrombus formation in patients with NVAF without LA enlargement (LA volume index ≤ 34mL/m2) was extremely rare (0.4%). LAA thrombus formation in patients with a mildly dilated LA volume index of 34-49.9mL/m2 and paroxysmal AF was also extremely rare (0.0%). LAA flow is strongly associated with LAA thrombus formation, even in NVAF patients treated with appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. Augmented oral anticoagulation therapy or transcatheter or surgical LAA closure should be considered for such patients, especially for those with an LAA flow < 18cm/s. Furthermore, TEE for evaluating LAA thrombus before catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion may be unnecessary for NVAF patients who are undergoing appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy, depending on LA size.

Leak closure following left atrial appendage exclusion procedures: A multicenter registry.

Though infrequent, incomplete left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may result from residual leaks. Percutaneous closure has been described though data is limited. We compiled a registry from four centers of patients undergoing percutaneous closure of residual leaks following LAAC via surgical means or with the Watchman device. Leak severity was classified as none (no leak), mild (1-2 mm), moderate (3-4 mm), or severe (≥5 mm). Procedural and clinical success was defined as the elimination of leak or mild residual leak at the conclusion of the procedure or follow-up, respectively. Of 72 (age 72.2 ± 9.2 years; 67% male) patients, 53 had undergone prior LAAC using the Watchman device and 19 patients surgical LAAC. Mean CHADS2 -VA2 Sc score was 4.0 ± 1.8. The median leak size was 5 mm, range: 2-13). A total of 13 received Amplatzer Vascular Plug-II, 18 received Amplatzer Duct Occluder-II and 40 patients received coils. One underwent closure using a 21 mm-Watchman. Procedural success was 94%. Zero surgical and nine Watchman patients (13%) had a residual leak at procedural-end (five mild, three moderate, and one severe)-only one patient had no reduction in leak size. Overall leak size reduction was 94%. Two (3%) had intraoperative pericardial effusion. There were no device embolizations, device-related thrombi, or procedural deaths. Clinical success was maintained at 94%. Two had cerebrovascular accidents-at 2 days (transient ischemic attack) and 10 months postprocedure. Two had major bleeding outside the 30-day periprocedural window. Percutaneous closure of residual leaks following left atrial appendage closure is feasible and associated with good outcomes. The procedural risk appears to be satisfactory.

Advances in Neurocardiology: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation.

Advances in Neurocardiology: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation.

Surgical left atrial appendage closure: success rate and its relationship with cerebrovascular accident

Background: Several surgical procedures such as excision or exclusion are recommended for the closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA). This study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the success rate of different surgical techniques for LAA closure, their respective complications, and the rate of post-surgical cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Methods: This retrospective study included 150 consecutive patients who underwent LAA closure most commonly after mitral valve surgery within 3 to 6 months after surgery. An expert echocardiographic fellow collected the data on patients’ surgical LAA closure methods and history of CVA, types of prosthetic valves, mortality, and bleeding. Results: The failure rate for complete LAA closure was 36.7% (55 patients) in our study. The greatest success rate of complete LAA closure was seen in purse-string method (75.5%), followed by resection method (71.4%), while the lowest success rate (≈ 33.3%) was observed in ligation method. A significant relationship was observed between clots on the surface of metallic valve and postoperative CVA (P = 0.001; likelihood ratio: 32).In multivariate analysis, there was also no statistically significant relationship between partial LAA closure and the incidence of post-surgical CVA (P > 0.050). Conclusion: We observed the highest success rate of complete LAA closure in purse-string method followed by resection method. Interestingly, our results showed that despite the higher rate of residual LAA clot in cases of partial LAA closure, the occurrence of post-surgical CVA was mostly related to the presence of clots on the surface of metallic mitral prostheses rather than the presence of partial LAA closure.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An Emerging Option in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk of Bleeding.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia with an estimated prevalence of 1% in the general population. It is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, silent cerebral ischemia, and cognitive impairment. Due to the blood flow stasis and morphology, thrombus formation occurs mainly in the left atrial appendage (LAA), particularly in the setting of nonvalvular AF (NVAF). Previous studies have shown that >90% of emboli related to NVAF originate from the LAA, thus prevention of systemic cardioembolism is indicated. According to the current guidelines, anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), represents the standard of care in AF patients, in order to prevent ischemic stroke and peripheral embolization. Although these drugs are widely used and DOACs have shown, compared to VKAs, non-inferiority for stroke prevention with significantly fewer bleeding complications, some issues remain a matter of debate, including contraindications, side effects, and adherence. An increasing number of patients, indeed, because of high bleeding risk or after experiencing life-threatening bleedings, must take anticoagulants with extreme caution if not contraindicated. While surgical closure or exclusion of LAA has been historically used in patients with AF with contradictory results, in the recent years, a novel procedure has emerged to prevent the cardioembolic stroke in these patients: The percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Different devices have been developed in recent years, though not all of them are approved in Europe and some are still under clinical investigation. Currently available devices have shown a significant decrease in bleeding risk while maintaining efficacy in preventing thromboembolism. The procedure can be performed percutaneously through the femoral vein access, under general anesthesia. A transseptal puncture is required to access left atrium and is guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Evidence from the current literature indicates that percutaneous LAAO represents a safe alternative for those patients with contraindications for long-term oral anticoagulation. This review summarizes scientific evidences regarding LAAO for stroke prevention including clinical indications and an adequate patient selection.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incomplete Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage on Follow-up Transesophageal Echocardiogram.

In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is associated with an increased risk for cardio-embolic events compared to complete closure. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for incomplete surgical closure of the LAA in the modern surgical era. Records of 74 patients with surgical LAA closure who underwent follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram for any reason between 2010 and 2016, were assessed for incomplete closure. Complete closure was defined by absence of Doppler or color flow between the left atrial appendage and the left atrial body in more than 2 orthogonal views. Surgical LAA closure was incomplete in 21 patients (28%) and complete in 53 patients (72%). All included cases were completed via oversewing method with a double layer of running suture with or without excision of the LAA. While no individual demographic, echocardiographic, or surgical feature was significantly different between groups, incomplete closure of the LAA was more prevalent in patients with two or more of the risk factors; female sex, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (OR 5.1, 95%Cl 1.5-17). A significant rate of incomplete surgical LAA closure still exists in the modern surgical era, and the presence of multiple risk factors associate an increased risk of incomplete closure.

The relationship between incomplete surgical obliteration of the left atrial appendage and thromboembolic events after mitral valve surgery (from the ISOLATE Registry).

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common site of thrombus formation especially in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Complete surgical LAA closure (cSLC) is the surgical aim, however incomplete surgical LAA closure (iSLC) is not rare. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of thromboembolic complications (TEC) in AF patients with iSLC after mitral valve surgery. A total of 101 AF patients (mean age: 61.8 ± 11.8years; male:32), who underwent surgical suture ligation during mitral valve surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at least 3months after surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of TEC including any ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary or peripheral embolism. TEE examination revealed cSLC in 66 (65.3%) and iSLC in 35 patients (34.6%). A total of 12 TECs (11.9%) occurred during a mean follow-up time of 41.1 ± 15.6months. TECs were found to be significantly higher in the iSLC group (25.7% vs 4.5%, p = 0.002). The prevalence of iSLC was significantly higher in patients with TEC (75 vs. 29.2%, p = 0.002). High CHA2DS2-VASc Score and iSLC were found to be independent predictors of TEC. Long term TEC free survival was found to be significantly decreased in patients with iSLC. The presence of iSLC was associated with a significantly increased risk of TEC in AF patients after mitral valve surgery. Routine intraoperative and postoperative screening for iSLC by TEE and long-term strict anticoagulation therapy are recommended in these patients.

Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation : An update

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most frequent causes of ischemic stroke. Without treatment the annual risk of ischemic stroke is on average approximately 5-6%/year in patients with atrial fibrillation, depending on the overall cardiovascular risk profile. Oral anticoagulation with new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is recommended for patients with AF and an elevated risk for stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1); however, severe bleeding complications are potential reasons for discontinuation of this treatment. Overall, up to 30 % of the patients with AF remain without effective thromboembolism prophylaxis. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents an alternative to pharmaceutical stroke prevention. Catheter-based and surgical LAA closure techniques are available. For catheter-based procedures with closure systems, high implantation success rates and relatively low periprocedural complication rates have been observed in recent registry studies. The reason for the restrained recommendation in the European guidelines is the as yet limited experience from large randomized studies.

Beneficial effect of left atrial appendage closure during cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 280585 patients.

In non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF), left atrial appendage (LAA) is thought to be the source of embolism in 90% of the strokes. Thus, as recent clinical trials have shown the non-inferiority of percutaneous LAA closure (LAAc) in comparison to medical treatment, and despite a IIb recommendation in the latest guidelines for concomitant surgical LAAc, we sought to investigate the beneficial effect of LAAc in the surgical population. A meta-analysis model was performed comparing studies including any cardiac surgery with or without concomitant surgical LAAc reporting stoke/embolic events and/or mortality, from inception to January 2019. Twenty-two studies (280585 patients) were included in the model. Stroke/embolic events both in the perioperative period [relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.82; P = 0.0001] and during follow-up of >2 years (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.89; P < 0.005) were significantly reduced in patients who underwent surgical LAAc (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.87; P = 0.001). Regarding the rate of preoperative AF, LAAc showed protective effect against stroke/embolic events in studies with >70% preoperative AF (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.77; P < 0.00001) but no benefit in the studies with <30% of preoperative AF (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46-1.28; P = 0.31). Postoperative mortality was also significantly lower in surgical patients with LAAc at the mid- and long-term follow-up. (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.67-0.78; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). Based on these findings, concomitant surgical LAAc is associated with lower rates of embolic events and stroke in the postoperative period in patients with preoperative AF and also improves postoperative mortality in the mid- and long-term follow-up.