Surgical Fixation Methods Research Articles

Mandibular Fractures in Edentulous Patients with Bone Atrophy and Osseointegrated Dental Implants: Therapeutic Management in a Case Series.

Background and Objectives: This research describes the management of mandibular fractures in edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles and implant-retained overdentures, exploring etiologies and treatment options. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study (January 2010-December 2023) was conducted on six patients from two hospitals (Hospital Gregorio Marañón y Hospital La Paz, Madrid). The data collected included fracture etiology, treatment type, and complications. Results: All six patients were women, with a mean age of 76.33 years. The most common cause of fracture was peri-implantitis (50%). Surgical treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) was performed in five patients, with different surgical approaches and fixation methods. One patient, due to multiple comorbidities, received conservative treatment. Complications occurred in 50% of cases, including delayed healing and hypoesthesia. The average hospital stay was four days, with a mean follow-up of 34 months. Conclusions: Mandibular fractures in these patients are rare. Surgical treatment using rigid fixation plates is recommended. The rational use of bone grafting should be taken into account. Treatment depends on fracture type, patient condition, and surgeon experience.

Comparison of plate and compression screw in the treatment of hallux rigidus with arthrodesis: a retrospective study

Objectives: Although numerous surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described for the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) with arthrodesis, consensus on the gold standard treatment has not been reached. The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of compression screw fixation and plate fixation in the treatment of HR with arthrodesis. Methods: Patients who underwent arthrodesis surgery due to HR between January 2021 and December 2023 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: those who underwent arthrodesis with plate fixation (PLATE) and those who underwent arthrodesis with compression screw fixation (SCREW). Demographic data including age, gender, affected side, operative time, hallux valgus angle (HVA), dorsiflexion angle, AOFAS scores, and implant irritation data were compared among patients with at least 3 months of follow-up. Results: It was observed that all patients included in the study had successful bone union without any complications. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, affected side, preoperative HVA, and preoperative AOFAS scores (P=0.970, P=0.426, P=0.694, P=0.216, and P=0.905, respectively). The mean operation time and postoperative AOFAS score were lower in the PLATE group compared to the SCREW group (P=0.006 and P=0.004, respectively). However, in the SCREW group, the dorsiflexion angle and the rate of implant irritation were lower compared to the PLATE group (P=0.016 and P=0.01, respectively). Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of HR, both plate fixation arthrodesis and compression screw arthrodesis are reliable surgical techniques. While plate fixation arthrodesis is a faster and more practical method, arthrodesis with a compression screw results in fewer complaints related to the implant and provides a more functional recovery.

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral versus unilateral ramus fixation in straddle fractures with posterior pelvic ring injury.

Superior and inferior ramus fractures, termed straddle fractures, are high-energy fractures often accompanied by unstable pelvic ring injuries. However, consensus is lacking regarding indications for surgical treatment or fixation methods. We aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral ramus fixation (URF) and bilateral ramus fixation (BRF) for straddle fractures with unilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries. We enrolled 118 patients (73 males, 45 females; mean age, 47 years) diagnosed with straddle fractures between March 2015 and December 2021 with > 1 year of follow-up. Patients were divided into URF (n = 60) and BRF (n = 58) groups based on the anterior pelvic ring fixation method. Preoperative factors including body mass index, diabetes, smoking, injury mechanism, injury severity score, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system, Tile classification, and Young and Burgess classification were compared. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative bone union rate, complications, and the need for additional surgeries were analyzed. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the two groups. However, the URF group showed a significantly lower mean operative time and blood transfusion requirement (63min and 2 units, respectively) than the BRF group (104min and 3 units, respectively) (both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, bone union was achieved in 57 (95.0%) and 56 (96.6%) patients in the URF and BRF groups, respectively. Complications occurred in 17 (28.3%) and 14 (24.1%) patients in the URF and BRF groups, respectively, with additional surgeries needed in 3 (5.0%) patients in the URF group and 2 (3.4%) patients in the BRF group. Unilateral anterior fixation can provide sufficient stability and clinical effectiveness in the surgical treatment of straddle fractures in areas with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Compared with bilateral anterior fixation, unilateral fixation significantly reduces operation time and blood loss, making it a viable fixation method for straddle fractures.

OUTCOMES OF DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE IN THE ELDERLY TREATED WITH EITHER SINGLE PLATE OR DUAL PLATING OR NAIL-PLATE COMBINATION: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE CENTRE

IntroductionDistal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP).MethodsA retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year.ResultsA cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year.ConclusionOur analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures.

Clinical Outcomes and Management Strategies for Capitellum and Trochlea Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Capitellum and trochlea fractures, also referred to as coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, are infrequent yet challenging intra-articular fractures of the elbow. There are a variety of surgical approaches and fixation methods with often variable outcomes. This systematic review investigates interventions, outcomes and complications of capitellum and trochlea fractures. A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature (CINAHL) was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of capitellum and trochlea fractures managed surgically. Data on patient demographics, surgical approach, implant usage, postoperative outcomes and complications were compiled. Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 700 patients. Surgical interventions primarily utilized either the lateral (79%) or antero-lateral (15%) approaches with headless compression screws as the most common fixation method (68%). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) with a mean score of 89.9 (±2.6) and the DASH score with a mean of 16.9 (±7.3). Elbow range of motion showed a mean flexion of 126.3° (±19.4), extension of 5.71° (±11.8), pronation of 75.23° (±12.2), and supination of 76.6° (±9.8). The mean flexion-extension arc was 113.7° (±16.9), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 165.31° (±9.41). Complications occurred in 19.8% of cases, with re-interventions required in 8.3% of cases, mainly due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness requiring surgical release. Other complications included implant removal (10.4%), overall reported stiff elbows (6%), nerve palsies (2%), non-union (1.5%), and infection (1.2%). The treatment of capitellum and trochlea fractures yields satisfactory outcomes but has a considerable rate of complications and reoperations primarily due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness. There is noteworthy variability in the achieved range of motion, suggesting unpredictable outcomes. Deficits in functionality and range of motion are common after surgery, especially with more complex injury patterns.

Comparison between anterior-to-posterior screw fixation versus posterolateral approach plate fixation for posterior malleous fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeThere are two main surgical fixation methods for the posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), the anterior-to-posterior (AP) screws or via the posterolateral (PL) approach utilizing a buttress plate. This review aims to compare the clinical outcome between the AP screw fixation and the PL plate fixation for treating PMFs. MethodsWe searched all relevant publications about PMFs treated with AP screws or PL plates through electronic databases including the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Embase, the Wiley online library and the Web of Science. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluated clinical outcomes including reduction quality, post-operative function and complications. ResultsSix studies (one single randomized controlled trial and five retrospective cohort studies) were enrolled. 172 patients underwent AP screw fixation and 214 patients underwent PL plate fixation with a total of 386 patients (169 males and 217 females). The PL plating group yielded better AOFAS scores(MD = 6.97, 95 % CI=[4.68, 9.27], P＜0.00001, I2 =0 %) and was more likely to achieve excellent anatomical reduction(OR=5.49, 95 % CI=[1.06, 28.42], P = 0.04, I2 =80 %). No differences were found in the bad reduction quality, incidences of complications (arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees. ConclusionWe suggest that the PL plate fixation method has the clinical benefit of achieving anatomical reduction and better AOFAS scores over the AP screw fixation for treating PMFs. No differences were found in the incidences of complications ( arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees. The posterior approach and the direct reduction are recommended for the treatment of the PMFs. Level of ConfidenceⅡb

Surgical methods of treatment for tibial diaphyseal fractures

Background. Bone fractures are a public health concern. In recent years, there has been an upward trend in body weight of people of all age groups. Obesity has long been thought to help protect against fractures, but recent studies have shown that for every 5 cm increase in waist circumference, the risk of any fracture is 3 % higher. The purpose: according to the meta-analysis of modern medical literature, to determine the main directions of surgical treatment for long bone fractures, their advantages, and disadvantages, including in overweight patients, the features of diaphyseal fracture fixation in overweight patients. Materials and methods. A meta-analysis of special literature from scientific databases was conducted: Cochrane Library, Scopus, National Library of Medicine — National Institutes of Health, ReLAB-HS Rehabilitation Resources Repository. One hundred and thirty articles were analyzed, from them 31 were selected, which, in our opinion, reflect the purpose of the study. Results. All methods of surgical fixation of fractures have their advantages and disadvantages. The frequency of nonunions caused by intramedullary fixation of the femoral shaft can reach 10 %, and varus/valgus and rotational deformities and shortening can also be observed. But the use of locking screws prevents the occurrence of most complications. When fixing the fractures with plates, the main complications are related to superficial and deep infections, which were more often observed in overweight patients. The analysis demonstrated that in overweight and obese patients, the main complicating factor is not the method for fixing the fracture zone, but factors related to the health of the patient himself. So, despite the fact that the results of treatment of fractures in patients with normal weight and obesity did not have a statistically significant difference, an increase in cardiovascular complications, exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases was observed. Moreover, it is the presence of concomitant diseases that often makes surgical intervention impossible. Conclusions. There is a large amount of research on surgical methods of fixing tibial diaphyseal fractures, but data on the choice of fixation method in overweight and obese patients as a separate approach were not found. There are data on complicating factors of excess weight in the treatment of fractures and surgical interventions. Systematic studies related specifically to the algorithm for choosing the method of fracture fixation and complications have also not been found.

Periosteal wrapping of the hamstring tendon autograft improves graft healing and prevents tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament anatomic reconstruction

IntroductionThe periosteum is a readily available tissue at the hamstring harvest site that could be utilized to enhance graft healing and prevent tunnel widening without additional cost or morbidity. This study aimed to compare graft healing using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional clinical outcome scores in a matched cohort of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts with or without periosteal augmentation.Material and methodsForty-eight patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) were prospectively enrolled: 25 with standard ACLR (ST-ACLR) and 23 with periosteal augmented grafts (PA-ACLR). The same surgical techniques, fixation methods, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), graft healing at the bone-graft interface, graft signal according to the Howell scale, and femoral tunnel widening were evaluated using MRI after 1 year of follow-up. International knee documentation score (IKDC), Lysholm, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale for pain were used for functional evaluation at a minimum of 2 years postoperative.ResultsThe mean SNQ of the proximal part of the graft was 9.6 ± 9.2 and 2.9 ± 3.3 for the ST-ACLR and PA-ACLR groups, respectively (P = 0.005). The mean femoral tunnel widening was 30.3% ± 18.3 and 2.3% ± 9.9 for the ST-ACLR, PA-ACLR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Complete graft tunnel healing was observed in 65% and 28% of cases in the PA-ACLR and ST-ACLR groups, respectively. Both groups showed marked improvements in functional scores, with no statistically significant differences.ConclusionPeriosteal wrapping of hamstring tendon autografts is associated with better graft healing and maturation and lower incidence of femoral tunnel widening based on MRI analysis 1 year after ACL reconstruction. However, patient-reported outcomes and measured laxity were similar between the two groups at 2 years follow up.Trial registrationTrail registration number: PACTR202308594339018, date of registration: 1/5/2023, retrospectively registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (pactr.samrc.ac.za) database.

Study on the therapeutic effect of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-stitch technique in the treatment of comminuted patellar inferopolar fractures.

Fractures of the inferior patellar pole, unlike other patellar fractures, present challenges for traditional surgical fixation methods. This article introduces the clinical technique and outcomes of using Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures. This retrospective case series study included 14 patients with comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures treated at our institution from September 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022. All patients underwent surgery using the Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch technique. Follow-up assessments involved postoperative X-rays to evaluate fracture healing, as well as clinical parameters such as healing time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, range of motion (ROM), and Bostman scores. All patients were followed for an average of over 12 months, with no cases of internal fixation failure. Knee joint stability and function were excellent. X-rays revealed an average healing time of approximately 10.79 ± 1.53 weeks, hospitalization lasted 5.64 ± 1.15 days, surgery took approximately 37.86 ± 5.32 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss was 33.29 ± 8.15 ml. One patient experienced irritation from the internal fixation material. At the final follow-up, the Bostman score averaged 28.29 ± 0.83, knee joint flexion reached 131.07° ± 4.88°, all patients achieved full knee extension, and the VAS score was 0.36 ± 0.63. Kirschner wire tension band with anchor screw cross-stitch fixation for comminuted inferior patellar pole fractures delivered satisfactory clinical outcomes. This surgical method, characterized by its simplicity and reliability, is a valuable addition to clinical practice.

Complex Elbow Fracture-Dislocations: An Algorithmic Approach to Treatment.

Elbow stability arises from a combination of bony congruity, static ligamentous and capsular restraints, and dynamic muscular activation. Elbow trauma can disrupt these static and dynamic stabilizers leading to predictable patterns of instability; these patterns are dependent on the mechanism of injury and a progressive failure of anatomic structures. An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries can improve the diagnostic assessment and reconstruction of the bony and ligamentous restraints to restore a stable and functional elbow. Achieving optimal outcomes requires a comprehensive understanding of pertinent local and regional anatomy, the altered mechanics associated with elbow injury, versatility in surgical approaches and fixation methods, and a strategic rehabilitation plan.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis options

Introduction Treatment methods for late stages of ankle osteoarthritis are varied, but the issue of assessing the long-term results of various fixation methods has not yet been studied, and this issue is of great importance in clinical practice.Purpose To compare the effectiveness of the fixation methods commonly used for ankle arthrodesis in patients with advanced ankle osteoarthritis.Materials and methods Eighty-two patients with advanced ankle osteoarthritis were treated with ankle fusion between 2019 and 2023 at three major medical institutions. All patients underwent 12-month follow-ups. The patients were divided into four groups depending on the method of surgical fixation of bone fragments.Results Most patients showed a significant improvement in the function and a decrease in pain intensity after the arthrodesis operation. The comparison of the effectiveness of various surgical fixation methods found that external apparatus screw fixation is characterized by lower blood loss and a relatively short duration of the operation. Plate and screw fixation resulted in higher AOFAS and VAS scores at 3 months postoperatively. However, by the 12th month after surgery, the differences in these two indicators were insignificant.Discussion Despite the various complications that occur in ankle arthrodesis, it remains effective for most patients. Among them, the Ilizarov apparatus is more suitable for patients with compromised conditions in the surgical area. Each method of surgical fixation has its own advantages and shortcomings, but the difference in long-term effectiveness is small. Conclusion Ankle arthrodesis is an effective treatment for advanced ankle osteoarthritis. The choice of surgical method is still subject to the principle of individual approach.

Comparative study of retrograde intramedullary nailing versus locking extramedullary plating in complete articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution of the distal femur.

Fractures of the distal femur with metaphyseal comminution and complete intra-articular involvement (AO/OTA classifications 33C2 and 33C3) present challenges for reduction and fixation. However, an optimal fixation method remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking extramedullary plating (LEP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution. Between January 2016 and May 2022, 80 patients (45 men and 35 women; average age, 56.7 years) diagnosed with AO/OTA 33C2 and 33C3 were treated with either LEP or RIN and followed up for at least one year. Post-operative evaluations included radiographic assessments of bone union rate, timing, and alignment. Clinically, the knee joint range of motion (ROM), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade were analyzed. The complications were also compared. 36 underwent LEP and 44 underwent RIN. Bone union was observed in 69.4% and 63.6% of the patients in the LEP and RIN groups, respectively (p = 0.64). The average union time was 6.9 months for the LEP group and 6.6 months for the RIN group (p = 0.51). A tendency toward varus deformity was observed in the RIN group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in knee ROM, LEFS, or KL grade. Complications included non-union (33.8%; RIN, 11; LEP, 16), varus deformity (5%; RIN, 4; LEP, 0), infection (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), heterotrophic ossification (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), and wound dehiscence (2.5%; RIN, 2; LEP, 0). The surgical fixation methods, RIN and LEP, for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, regardless of the type of fixation device used, there was a reduced rate of bone union owing to high energy and a less favorable prognosis.

[Translated article] Better results in consolidation of hallux metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with dorsal plate and interfragmentary compression screw

Background and aimsThe first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is indicated for the treatment of various pathologies as a technique to reduce pain and improve the support of the first radius. Numerous surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described, with the combination of a dorsal plate and an interfragmentary screw being the one that has shown to be the most stable construct in biomechanical studies. Our aim is to analyze the radiological results after metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of the hallux using a dorsal plate associated or not with an interfragmentary screw. The differences in terms of consolidation rates and complications in patients diagnosed with hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, hallux varus and failure of previous surgeries were evaluated. Materials and methodsA retrospective cohort study of 55 patients with a mean age of 65.10 years in whom a dorsal plate was used was performed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether or not an interfragmentary screw was used. The minimum follow-up was 6 months after surgery. The assessment of the pre and postoperative radiological results was based on the variation of the hallux angle, the intermetatarsal angle and the dorsal metatarsophalangeal angle of the hallux, as well as the cases of nonunion identified in each study group. ResultsThe radiological results, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were only found in the dorsal metatarsophalangeal angle between both study groups. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the radiological evaluation of the pre and postoperative hallux angle and intermetatarsal angle. An equal decrease of each angles was observed in both study groups. Regarding the consolidation rate, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between group A, which associated an interfragmentary screw, presenting a consolidation rate of 92%, and group B, which did not associate an interfragmentary screw, and that presented a union rate of 63%. ConclusionHallux metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of the hallux with a dorsal plate and interfragmentary screw show best results regarding consolidation rate and complications compared to those cases in which an interfragmentary screw was not used.

Selection of posterior fixation segments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

With the further understanding of the concept of three-dimensional correction by spinal surgeons, the progress of internal fixation instruments, de-rotation tools and the improvement of surgical techniques, the scientific formulation of surgical strategies for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has gradually become the focus of controversy. The formulation of preoperative surgical strategy not only directly affects the correction of deformity and balance reconstruction, but also is directly related to the activity function of spine and the quality of life of patients after operation. Therefore, this paper will discuss from three aspects: the method of surgical fixation, the surgical approach and the selection of fixed vertebrae. The author believes that Risser sign should be taken as an important consideration to judge the method of surgical fixation. The choice of surgical approach must refer to the operator's familiarity and experience with the approach, grasp the adaptive signs and consider the risks and benefits of the operation, and choose the appropriate surgical approach according to the needs of different patients. The choice of fixed vertebrae, choosing upper end vertebra (UEV) as upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), is safer than the more radical upper end vertebra-1 (UEV-1), and five factors need to be combined in the specific selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV).

Alternative Surgical Treatment Method for 5th Metacarpal Neck Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Intramedullary and Transverse K-Wire Fixations with Additional Antirotational K-Wire.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications associated with intramedullary and transverse K-wire fixations of 5th metacarpal neck fractures. Patients who were operated for 5th metacarpal neck fractures between 2019 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Regarding the surgical treatment methods, patients were assessed by dividing them into two groups. The first group comprised patients who underwent treatment with an intramedullary K-wire. The second group comprises patients who underwent transverse K-wire fixation. The average quick DASH score of all patients was 5.6±4.7 in the intramedullary K-wire fixation group and 5.9±5.1 in the transverse K-wire fixation group. An average 5th finger metacarpophalangeal joint extension limitation was 6.2±5.7° in the intramedullary fixation group and 6.1±5.8° in the transverse K-wire group. The mean radiological union time was 4.9±0.7 weeks in the intramedullary fixation group and 5.1±0.7 weeks in the transverse K-wire group. No statistically significant difference was found between the quick DASH scores and degrees of the MCP joint extension limitation ( p=0.785). Intramedullary fixation and transverse K-wire fixations are effective surgical treatment methods for metacarpal neck fractures. It has been reported that the intramedullary fixation method in metacarpal bone fractures is more effective than the fixation methods with cross and transverse K-wire. But our results revealed no difference in clinical outcomes between the two surgical fixation methods. We observed no statistically significant difference between the two fixation techniques with regard to union, clinical outcomes, or complications. intramedullary fixation; metacarpal neck fracture; transverse K-wire fixation.

A novel minimally invasive fixation method for flail chest management in a Canine model: an animal research

BackgroundMultiple rib fractures can lead to flail chest with up to 35% mortality rate due to severe pulmonary complications. Current treatments of flail chest remain controversial. Studies have shown that surgical treatments can improve outcomes and reduce mortality, comparing to non-operative treatments. Current surgical fixation methods focus on stabilization of ribs on the outward facing side, and they require division of intercostal muscles. Damages to surrounding nerves and vessels may lead to chronic pain. This study tests a novel interior fixation method that minimizes neurovascular injuries.MethodsTwelve healthy canines were divided in two surgical operation groups for exterior and interior fixation using titanium metal plates. Osteotomy with oblique fractures was prepared under general anesthesia. Exterior fixation was performed in open surgery. Interior fixation was minimally invasive using custom made tools including a flexible shaft extension screwdriver, solid plate stand, guiding wire loop and metal plates with threaded holes.ResultsRespiratory and cardiovascular functions (RR, PO2, PCO2, SpO2, and HR) together with body temperature were measured before anesthesia and within 48 h after surgery. The difference in measurements was not statistically significant between the two groups before surgery with P values greater than 0.05. However, the interior group canines had better RR and PO2 values starting from the 24th hour, and better PCO2, SpO2, and HR values starting from the 48th hour. It took longer operation time to complete the minimally invasive interior fixation surgery (P value less than 0.001), but the total blood loss was less than the exterior fixation group (P value less than 0.001). Results also showed that interior group canines suffered less pain, and they had quicker recovery in gastrointestinal and physical mobility.ConclusionsThe investigative interior fixation method was safe and effective in rib stabilization on a canine rib fracture model, comparing to the exterior fixation method. The interior fixation was minimally invasive, with less damages to tissues and nerves surrounding the ribs, leading to better postoperative outcomes.

Mejores resultados en la consolidación de la artrodesis metatarsofalángica del hallux con placa dorsal y tornillo de compresión interfragmentario

Introduction and aimsThe first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is indicated for the treatment of various pathologies as a technique to reduce pain and improve the support of the first radius. Numerous surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described, with the combination of a dorsal plate and an interfragmentary screw being the one that has shown to be the most stable construct in biomechanical studies. Our aim is to analyze the radiological results after metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of the hallux using a dorsal plate associated or not with an interfragmentary screw. The differences in terms of consolidation rates and complications in patients diagnosed with hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, hallux varus and failure of previous surgeries were evaluated. Material and methodsA retrospective cohort study of 55 patients with a mean age of 65.10 years in whom a dorsal plate was used was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether or not an interfragmentary screw was used. The minimum follow-up was 6 months after surgery. The assessment of the pre and postoperative radiological results was based on the variation of the hallux angle, the intermetatarsal angle and the dorsal metatarsophalangeal angle of the hallux, as well as the cases of nonunion identified in each study group. ResultsThe radiological results, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were only found in the dorsal metatarsophalangeal angle between both study groups. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the radiological evaluation of the pre and postoperative hallux angle and intermetatarsal angle. An equal decrease of each angles was observed in both study groups. Regarding the consolidation rate, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between group A, which associated an interfragmentary screw, presenting a consolidation rate of 92%, and group B, which did not associate an interfragmentary screw, and that presented a union rate of 63%. ConclusionsHallux metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of the hallux with a dorsal plate and interfragmentary screw show best results regarding consolidation rate and complications compared to those cases in which an interfragmentary screw was not used.

Prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after distal biceps tendon repair.

Complete distal biceps tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon. Conservative treatment may result in persistent pain and weakness. Therefore, surgical repair is usually indicated in order to restore strength. Different surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described. The most reported complications after surgery are iatrogenic nerve damage, heterotopic ossification (HO) and re-rupture. Heterotopic ossification can be variable in size. Significant HO can limit range of motion while minor HO often remains asymptomatic. The overall presence of HO is likely underreported in literature, as imaging is reserved for symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon. This retrospective study assessed the prevalence and clinical relevance of postoperative HO after distal biceps tendon repair. CT-scans were used to evaluate size and location of the HO. VAS scores, DASH scores, MEPI, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed to evaluate pain, patient satisfaction and elbow function. HO was observed on CT images of 19 out of 35 patients (54%). The use of interference screws, timing of surgery after rupture and timing of radiographic assessment postoperatively did not influence the prevalence of HO. The presence of HO had no statistically significant impact on the VAS scores, ROM measurements and MEPI and DASH scores. According to our findings, the overall incidence of HO is higher than previously reported but there are no differences in clinical outcomes when compared to patients without HO.

Clinical study of a steel cable fixation for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

In order to overcome the shortcomings of common surgical fixation methods for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis (DTS) injuries, which include the inability to exercise early, significant surgical trauma, and the risk of loosening and breakage of implants, we have designed and implemented a new technique using steel cable fixation to treat DTS injuries. Twenty-six patients treated with steel cable fixation for DTS injury between March 2013 and March 2019 in the Second Hospital of Tangshan City trauma department were followed up to monitor the efficacy of treatment. There were 16 males and 10 females between the ages of 19 and 64, with a mean age of 41.81 ± 9.54 years. All patients were examined by X-ray and CT for 3 days before and after surgery. The patients were then reexamined by X-ray 6 and 9 weeks postoperatively, and by CT 1 year later. The treatment results were evaluated by comparing the distal tibiofibular anterior, middle, and posterior gap changes and the Baird-Jackson score. The 26 patients attained good postoperative repositioning, with a fracture healing time of 2.5 to 3 months. and the Baird-Jackson score was 96 ± 2.78. After surgery, the DTS gaps observed in the CT scans taken 3 days and 1 year postoperatively in all patients were significantly reduced compared to the preoperative measurements, with statistical significance (P < .05). However, when comparing the CT scans taken 1 year postoperatively to those at 3 days postoperatively, there was no significant change in the anterior gap. The middle and posterior gaps of DTS showed a slight increase with statistical significance (P < .05), but all measurements remained within the normal range. Steel cable fixation for DTS injury has the advantages of reliable fixation, early functional exercise, and reduction in the number of operations, and no adverse effects or complications were found.

Suture Button Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Lisfranc injuries remain a significant but often misdiagnosed orthopaedic injury. Alongside traditional methods of surgical fixation, including arthrodesis and ORIF with screws, suture button fixation is an emerging technique. While several studies have reviewed the outcomes of Lisfranc injuries utilizing plate, screw, and k-wire constructs for arthrodesis or ORIF, there has yet to be a review of the literature focusing on suture button fixation outcomes of Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate studies utilizing suture button fixation for the treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of Lisfranc injury until August 19, 2022. This combination search strategy employed the following keywords: ((Lisfranc OR Midfoot OR Tarsometatarsal) AND (Injury OR Instability OR Fracture OR Dislocation)) AND (ORIF OR Fixation OR Reconstruction OR suture* OR button* OR Fiber*). The quality of all included studies in this review was evaluated by a modified Coleman score. Clinical outcomes including pre and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, pre and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and radiographic outcomes such as diastasis were extracted from the text and figures of each study. Return to sports/duty and time to return as well as postoperative complication diagnoses and complications were also extracted from each article. Results: Of the 10 studies included, there were 186 total patients with an age range of 13-72. In every study, all patients were able to return to sport or activity with a return time averaging from 10.8-55.1 weeks. Postoperative AOFAS scores ranged from 83.5- 97 while VAS ranged from 0.6-2.5. Complications were reported in six studies at a rate of 6.7 % including two cases of diastasis, two cases of paresthesia, one case of button irritation, and one of postoperative degenerative joint disease, with no reported revisions. Conclusion: This study summarizes the current evidence regarding suture button fixation of Lisfranc injuries including return to sport, postoperative diastasis, and patient-reported outcomes. In sum, these studies found that suture button fixation shows high levels of patient-reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries. This surgical technique is advantageous as it provides a more physiologic reduction across the Lisfranc joint and reduces the need for reoperation including the removal of hardware. Further evidence such as large sample size and high-quality RCT studies is needed to draw a definitive conclusion regarding the best treatment for Lisfranc injuries.