Surgical Care Improvement Project Compliance Research Articles

Assessing the sustainability of compliance with surgical site infection prophylaxis after discontinuation of mandatory active reporting: study protocol

BackgroundSurgical site infections are common. Risk can be reduced substantially with appropriate preoperative antimicrobial administration. In 2005, the VA implemented the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) in the setting of high rates of non-compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. SCIP included public reporting of evidenced-based antimicrobial guideline compliance metrics in high-risk surgeries. SCIP was highly successful and led to high rates of adoption of preoperative antimicrobials and early discontinuation of postoperative antimicrobials (>95%). The program was retired in 2015, as the manual measurement and reporting process was costly with limited expected additional benefit. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed whether the gains achieved by SCIP were sustained since active support for the program was discontinued. Furthermore, there has been no investigation of the spread of antimicrobial prophylaxis guideline adoption beyond the limited set of procedures that were included in the program.MethodsUsing a mixed methods sequential exploratory approach, this study will (1) quantitatively measure compliance with SCIP metrics over time and across all procedures in the five major surgical specialties targeted by SCIP and (2) collect qualitative data from stakeholders to identify strategies that were effective for sustaining compliance. Diffusion of Innovation Theory will guide assessment of whether improvements achieved spread to procedures not included under the umbrella of the program. Electronic algorithms to measure SCIP antimicrobial use will be adapted from previously developed methodology. These highly novel data mining algorithms leverage the rich VA electronic health record and capture structured and text data and represent a substantial technological advancement over resource-intensive manual chart review or incomplete electronic surveillance based on pharmacy data. An interrupted time series analysis will be used to assess whether SCIP compliance was sustained following program discontinuation. Generalized linear models will be used to assess whether compliance with appropriate prophylaxis increased in all SCIP targeted and non-targeted procedures by specialty over the duration the program’s active reporting. The Dynamic Sustainability Framework will guide the qualitative methods to assess intervention, provider, facility, specialty, and contextual factors associated with sustainability over time. Barriers and facilitators to sustainability will be mapped to implementation strategies and the study will yield an implementation playbook to guide future sustainment efforts.RelevanceSustainability of practice change has been described as one of the most important, but least studied areas of clinical medicine. Learning how practices spread is also a critically important area of investigation. This study will use novel informatics strategies to evaluate factors associated with sustainability following removal of active policy surveillance and advance our understanding about these important, yet understudied, areas.

Impact of Surgical Care Improvement Project Compliance on Surgical Site Infection in a Trauma Population

Impact of Surgical Care Improvement Project Compliance on Surgical Site Infection in a Trauma Population

Head and neck free flap surgical site infections in the era of the Surgical Care Improvement Project.

Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) parameters regarding antibiotic prophylaxis may affect surgical site infection rates. The purpose of this study was for us to report SCIP compliance, surgical site infection rates, and risk factors in a large series of head and neck free flap surgeries. A retrospective review of 480 free flap cases was performed. Surgical site infections occurring within 30 days postoperatively were noted. Surgical site infection occurred in 13.3% of cases. Prophylaxis was given in 99.8% of cases; ampicillin-sulbactam (83%) and clindamycin (9%) were most common. Prophylaxis was "on-time" in 92.3% of cases. There were no significant associations between surgical site infection and tumor stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, tumor subsite, or flap type. Prior radiation was a risk factor for surgical site infection in patients treated for malignancy. A surgical site infection rate of 13.3% was noted. In this cohort, with a compliance rate with prophylactic antibiotic measures, prior radiation was found to be a risk factor only in patients with cancer. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E392-E398, 2016.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improving SCIP Compliance

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is a national program aimed at reducing perioperative complications and is a quality benchmark metric for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This study evaluates whether a multidisciplinary program improved an institution's compliance with SCIP measures. Analysis of the facility's performance data identified three key areas of SCIP noncompliance: 1) timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotics and urinary catheters, 2) initiation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and 3) perioperative beta blocker administration. Multidisciplinary teams collaborated with providers and department chairs in reviewing and enable SCIP compliance. Anesthesia staff managed preoperative antibiotics. SCIP-compliant order sets, venous thromboembolism pop-up alerts, and progress note templates were added to the electronic medical record. Standardized education was provided to explain SCIP requirements, review noncompliant cases, and update teams on SCIP performance. Data were captured from January 2009 to March 2014. Ten SCIP fallouts were reported for general surgery specialties in January 2013, when the SCIP compliance project launched. Specifically, colon-related surgery achieved 100 per cent compliance. Six months after implementation, overall SCIP compliance at our institution improved by 65 per cent (from 90.7-98.6% compliance).

Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project for Body Temperature Management (SCIP Inf-10) Is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes.

In an effort to measure and improve the quality of perioperative care, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was introduced in 2003. The SCIP guidelines are evidence-based process measures designed to reduce preventable morbidity, but it remains to be determined whether SCIP-measure compliance is associated with improved outcomes. The authors retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical record data from 45,304 inpatients at a single institution to assess whether compliance with SCIP Inf-10 (body temperature management) was associated with a reduced incidence of morbidity and mortality. The primary outcomes were hospital-acquired infection and ischemic cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay. Body temperature on admission to the postoperative care unit was higher in the SCIP-compliant group (36.6° ± 0.5°C; n = 44,064) compared with the SCIP-noncompliant group (35.5° ± 0.5°C; n = 1,240) (P < 0.0001). SCIP compliance was associated with improved outcomes in both nonadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses. SCIP compliance was associated with a reduced incidence of hospital-acquired infection (3,312 [7.5%] vs.160 [12.9%] events; risk-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.85), ischemic cardiovascular events (602 [1.4%] vs. 38 [3.1%] events; risk-adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.92), and mortality (617 [1.4%] vs. 60 [4.8%] events; risk-adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.58). Median (interquartile range) hospital length of stay was also decreased: 4 (2 to 8) versus 5 (2 to 14) days; P < 0.0001. Compliance with SCIP Inf-10 body temperature management guidelines during surgery is associated with improved clinical outcomes and can be used as a quality measure.

SCIP Compliance: Cashing in for the Win

Baptist Health Louisville has been measuring compliance with the CMS Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) for many years. One of the components of SCIP, which is also a Value Based Purchasing (VBP) indicator, is SCIP 2. This indicator regulates appropriate preoperative prophylactic antibiotic selection, which has historically been a challenge in our large institution due to physician’s preferences and surgeon specific order sets.

Process measures to improve perioperative prophylactic antibiotic compliance: quality and financial implications.

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was launched in 2005. The core prophylactic perioperative antibiotic guidelines were created because of recognition of the impact of proper perioperative prophylaxis on an estimated annual 1 million inpatient days and $1.6 billion in excess health care costs that are secondary to preventable surgical site infections. There is a need to create low-cost, standardized processes on an institutional level to improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic administration. The impact of interventions on provider compliance with SCIP inpatient antibiotic guidelines and net financial gain or loss to a large tertiary center were assessed. A single hospital was able to significantly improve their SCIP compliance and emphasis on patient safety within a year of intervention implementation. The hospital earned an additional $290,612 in 2011 and $209,096 in 2012 for reinvestment in patient safety initiatives. Low-cost interventions aimed at educating providers that utilize existing infrastructure result in improved SCIP compliance and patient safety. As a secondary gain, there were hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual cost savings. The impact of compliance on infection rates is inferred but requires further study.

Description of a multidisciplinary initiative to improve SCIP measures related to pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis compliance: a single-center success story.

BackgroundThe Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was launched in 2005. The core prophylactic perioperative antibiotic guidelines were created due to recognition of the impact of proper perioperative prophylaxis on an estimated annual one million inpatient days and $1.6 billion in excess health care costs secondary to preventable surgical site infections (SSIs). An internal study was conducted to create low cost, standardized processes on an institutional level to improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic administration.MethodsWe assessed the impact of auditing and notifying providers of SCIP errors on overall compliance with inpatient antibiotic guidelines and on net financial gain or loss to a large tertiary center between March 1st 2010 and September 31st 2013. We hypothesized that direct physician-to-physician feedback would result in significant compliance improvements.ResultsThrough physician notification, our hospital was able to significantly improve SCIP compliance and emphasis on patient safety within a year of intervention implementation. The hospital earned an additional $290,612 in 2011 and $209,096 in 2012 for re-investment in patient care initiatives.ConclusionsProvider education and direct notification of SCIP prophylactic antibiotic dosing errors resulted in improved compliance with national patient improvement guidelines. There were differences between the anesthesiology and surgery department feedback responses, the latter likely attributed to diverse surgical department sub-divisions, frequent changes in resident trainees and supervising attending staff, and the comparative ability. Provider notification of guideline non-compliance should be encouraged as standard practice to improve patient safety. Also, the hospital experienced increased revenue for re-investment in patient care as a secondary result of provider notification.

The Effect of Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Compliance on Surgical Site Infections (SSI)

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) has developed a set of process compliance measures in an attempt to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). Previous research has been inconclusive on whether compliance with these measures is associated with lower SSI rates. To determine whether hospitals with higher levels of compliance with SCIP measures have lower incidence of SSIs and to identify the measures that are most likely to drive this association. Analysis of linked SCIP compliance rates and SSIs on 295 hospital groups observed annually over the study period 2007-2010. A hospital group comprises all hospitals sharing identical categories for location by state, teaching status, bed size, and urban/rural location. We used a generalized linear model regression with logistic link and binomial family to estimate the association between 3 SCIP measures and SSI rates. Hospital groups with higher compliance rates had significantly lower SSI rates for 2 SCIP measures: antibiotic timing and appropriate antibiotic selection. For a hospital group of median characteristics, a 10% improvement in the measure provision of antibiotic 1 hour before intervention led to a 5.3% decrease in the SSI rates (P<0.05). Rural hospitals had effect sizes several times larger than urban hospitals (P<0.05). A third-core measure, Timely Antibiotic Stop, showed no robust association. This analysis supports a clinically and statistically meaningful relationship between adherence to 2 SCIP measures and SSI rates, supporting the validity of the 2 publicly available healthcare-associated infection metrics.

Description of a multidisciplinary initiative to improve SCIP measures related to pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis compliance: a single-center success story

BackgroundThe Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was launched in 2005. The core prophylactic perioperative antibiotic guidelines were created due to recognition of the impact of proper perioperative prophylaxis on an estimated annual one million inpatient days and $1.6 billion in excess health care costs secondary to preventable surgical site infections (SSIs). An internal study was conducted to create low cost, standardized processes on an institutional level to improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic administration.MethodsWe assessed the impact of auditing and notifying providers of SCIP errors on overall compliance with inpatient antibiotic guidelines and on net financial gain or loss to a large tertiary center between March 1st 2010 and September 31st 2013. We hypothesized that direct physician-to-physician feedback would result in significant compliance improvements.ResultsThrough physician notification, our hospital was able to significantly improve SCIP compliance and emphasis on patient safety within a year of intervention implementation. The hospital earned an additional $290,612 in 2011 and $209,096 in 2012 for re-investment in patient care initiatives.ConclusionsProvider education and direct notification of SCIP prophylactic antibiotic dosing errors resulted in improved compliance with national patient improvement guidelines. There were differences between the anesthesiology and surgery department feedback responses, the latter likely attributed to diverse surgical department sub-divisions, frequent changes in resident trainees and supervising attending staff, and the comparative ability. Provider notification of guideline non-compliance should be encouraged as standard practice to improve patient safety. Also, the hospital experienced increased revenue for re-investment in patient care as a secondary result of provider notification.

Should Compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Process Measures Determine Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement Rates?

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is a project that focuses on improving surgical care by reducing surgical morbidity and mortality by 25 per cent by 2010. Starting in 2011, SCIP compliance affects Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates. Although SCIP reinforces better practices in surgical care, does compliance with SCIP measures actually result in a decrease in surgical morbidity and mortality? This study examined compliance with the SCIP surgical site infection (SSI) module (prophylactic antibiotic received within 1 hour before surgical incision) during 2009 to 2010 (n = 703) to determine whether patients compliant with SCIP data had a correlation with SSI rates as reported by National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for the same time period. We found no statistically significant association in patients that have failed SCIP INF1 in the years 2009 to 2010 (n = 43) and the rates of SSI (n = 0) for the same time period. These data suggest that SCIP compliance should not be used to determine Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates because there is no correlation between failure of SCIP INF1 and SSI. Instead, further effort should be placed on developing tools designed to acknowledge outcome measures that result in decreased morbidity/mortality and change practices accordingly such as NSQIP.

Shared Successes For Surgical Site Infection Reduction: Utilization of CHG-impregnated Cloths as an Adjunct to the Pre-op Shower

Surgical site infections (SSI) increase hospital costs and length of stay as well as adversely impact patient mortality. Reduction efforts have focused on implementation of a set of measures as part of the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), evidence-based practices that are well documented as a successful reduction strategy. Our facility is a 305-bed, acute care, non-teaching community hospital serving an inner-city population. After intensive implementation of the SCIP measures and compliance monitoring, it was determined that SSI reduction efforts for laminectomy cases could be further enhanced.

Utilization of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data to improve the rate of urinary tract infection in general surgery patients

Introduction Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common cause of increased cost and morbidity in general surgery patients and is most often associated with indwelling urinary catheters. The NSQIP identified our hospital as a high outlier for UTI in general surgery patients. A UTI-Performance Excellence Team (UTI-PET) was instituted in Q4 of 2009 to reduce the incidence of UTI. Methods The UTI-PET used a Define-Research-Analyze-Improve-Control strategy to derive evidence-based guidelines for perioperative urinary care and Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) compliance for urinary catheter removal. This study is a retrospective review of NSQIP data for UTI in general surgery patients pre- and post-introduction of the UTI-PET quality improvement measures. Results Between 7/08 and 9/10, our hospital recorded 5,481 general surgery cases in the NSQIP with 86 UTIs. Prior to the implementation of the UTI-PET, the quarterly rate of UTI peaked at 3.2% (average 2.7%) with a NSQIP expected rate of 1.4% and observed-to-expected ratio of 2.3. Compliance with SCIP guidelines was 65.5%. After implementation of the UTI-PET, the rate of UTI decreased to 1.0% with 95.2% SCIP compliance in Q3 of 2010. This represents a 69% relative and 2.2% absolute reduction in UTI rate (p = 0.007). Conclusions Real-time use of the NSQIP identified a need for improvement in the area of UTI. By implementing a UTI-PET, a significant reduction in UTI rate occurred. NSQIP is a powerful tool to identify areas of increased institutional morbidity and mortality and, therefore, serve to guide patient care protocol improvements.

Improving Surgical Site Infections: Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data to Institute Surgical Care Improvement Project Protocols in Improving Surgical Outcomes

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) began with the Veterans Affairs system to reduce morbidity and mortality by evaluating preoperative risk factors, postoperative occurrences, mortality reports, surgical site infections, and patient variable statistics. Our institution enrolled in NSQIP July 2006. The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was developed to reduce surgical complications, including surgical infections. We began instituting SCIP protocols in July 2007. This is a retrospective review of the NSQIP data collected by our NSQIP nurse. The colorectal surgical site infection (SSI) data pre- and post-institution of SCIP guidelines are analyzed. Data from the July 2006 to June 2007 and July 2007 to June 2008 reports are compared. Rates of SCIP compliance are analyzed. There were 113 colorectal cases in the July 2006 to June 2007 NSQIP report. The rate of superficial SSI was 13.3%, with an expected rate of 9.7% (p = 0.041). The observed-to-expected ratio was 1.39. Compliance with SCIP was 38%. There were 84 colorectal cases in the July 2007 to June 2008 NSQIP report. The rate of superficial SSI was 8.3%, with an expected rate of 10.25% (p = 0.351). The observed-to-expected ratio was 0.81. Compliance with SCIP measures was 92%. Participation in NSQIP can identify areas of increased morbidity and mortality. Our institution was a high outlier in superficial SSI in colorectal patients during the first NSQIP evaluations. SCIP guidelines were instituted and a statistically significant reduction in our rates of SSI was realized. As our compliance with SCIP improved, our rates of superficial SSI decreased. Reduction in superficial SSI decreases cost to the patient and decreases length of stay.

Lessons learned from the institution of the Surgical Care Improvement Project at a teaching medical center

Background The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was designed to reduce perioperative complications. We describe our institutional experience in 6 major areas: surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism prevention, use of perioperative β-blockade, serum glucose level greater than 200 mg/dL, normothermia, and the use of electric razors for hair removal. Methods This was a retrospective review of surgical cases. Evidence-based training and standardization of system and process were undertaken. Compliance with SCIP guidelines was determined. Results Overall SCIP compliance improved from 80% to 94% over a 2-year period. Standardized antibiotic dosing times improved compliance to more than 90%. Appropriate preoperative antibiotic choice improved to 100%. Cessation of antibiotics postoperatively within 24 hours remains a difficult task. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis has been difficult to achieve because of postoperative bleeding concerns. Administration of β-blockers has remained one of the most difficult problems to correct because of the multiplicity of avenues by which a patient may arrive to the operating suite. Conclusions Achievement of the SCIP goals is a formidable, but achievable, process requiring individual, cultural, systems, and institutional changes to achieve success.