Delivery Of Surgical Care Research Articles

Piloting an Assessment Tool to Organize Surgical Care in Armed Conflicts: Findings From Cameroon

IntroductionArmed conflict is increasing globally and is dramatically disrupting surgical care than ever before. To address this, the PIPESS (Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, Supplies, and Standard) tool was designed to facilitate assessment of hospital capacity. It assesses 6 key categories at 3 timepoints: preconflict, during conflict, and postconflict. This tool was piloted to assess the impact of conflict and COVID-19 on surgical care delivery at the Buea Regional Hospital in Cameroon. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, qualitative study combining in-depth interviews and on-site observations of the surgical care unit. The data collected during the interviews were then applied to the modified PIPESS tool to calculate a preconflict score based on recall and a during conflict score to quantify differences before and during conflict. ResultsWe interviewed 12 key informants: 6 patients, 3 doctors, and 3 other staff. The themes extracted from the preconflict period highlight major barriers including rudimentary prehospital care and referral limitations from remote areas, lack of funding and training, and a demand exceeding the supply of care. COVID-19 resulted in an influx of resources into the region and did not disrupt care to the extent of the conflict. Quantitatively, the PIPESS score for preconflict was 110, and the PIPESS score during conflict was 115, showing an increase in resources, specifically in personnel and infrastructure during conflict. ConclusionsThe conflict increased the burden on existing health centers and strained resources for trauma care. Paradoxically, surgical resources increased during the conflict likely because of increased international support along with local displacement of staff toward the hospital. Further data should be collected during the postconflict setting.

Differences in Surgical Cancer Care Delivery and Outcomes Between Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals in the United States: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

Studies evaluating the association of safety-net hospitals (SNHs) with outcomes of surgical care in cancer patients have demonstrated mixed results. We sought to systematically investigate the association of SNH status with measures of surgical cancer care delivery and outcomes. A comprehensive review of the literature identified from the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool. The findings were synthesized qualitatively. Of the 1749 records identified, 33 retrospective studies were included, 79% of which investigated national databases. Risk of bias assessment revealed average score of 78%. Among studies assessing each outcome, lower likelihood of receiving appropriate surgical interventions in SNH patients was reported by 85%; longer intervals to surgery by 100%; and prolonged hospital stays by 73%. Most studies reported no differences in survival (65%) or readmission (67%). Results were mixed regarding complications and mortality. Patient characteristics and shortage of resources and interdisciplinary teams were frequently proposed factors for observed disparities. Cancer patients at SNHs may be less likely to undergo some surgical treatments and experience longer intervals to treatment but achieve largely comparable short- and long-term outcomes to non-SNH patients.

Organization of abdominal emergency surgical care across healthcare services in Senegal: a cross-sectional nationwide survey

IntroductionStudying surgical services and the workforce in sub-Saharan Africa is crucial for enhancing access to quality surgical care in the region. Despite many recommendations to produce evidence based on reliable data on this subject to guide policymakers, there is still a knowledge gap on this topic. The aim of this nationwide survey was to describe the organization of abdominal emergency surgical care across healthcare services in Senegal.MethodologyThis was a cross-sectional nationwide survey. The study period was between October 1st, 2023, and January 20th, 2024. The target population included all registered healthcare facilities in Senegal offering emergency surgical services. A structured questionnaire was designed to gather infrastructure-related data, surgical activities, and human resources.ResultsAll 33 identified healthcare facilities responded to the survey (100%). Emergency abdominal surgery services were available for 96.7% of the surveyed structures. The teams were mainly composed of surgeons and residents (45.2%) or surgeons and medical trainees (48.8%). The average bed capacity of the services was 21.9, with a standard deviation of 13.9. The absence of a dedicated hospitalization section for patients requiring special monitoring was found in 69.6% of the facilities. Operating rooms dedicated to emergency abdominal digestive surgery were present in 54.6% of the services. On average, the services performed 17.6 scheduled surgical interventions with a standard deviation of 11.5 and 29.7 emergency surgical interventions with a standard deviation of 16.8 per month. Morbidity and mortality conferences were not routinely held in the majority of departments (only 27.3%). Professional development programmes were present only in 24.2% of departments. Most of the departments did not have adequate human resources (69.6%). A total of 70 surgeons were identified, resulting in a national ratio of 0.39 general surgeons per 100,000 inhabitants. The strategies employed to address staff shortages included additional working hour by staff (54.5%), temporary workers (30.3%) or the use of trainee doctors or nurses (12.1%).ConclusionThis research shows that significant deficiencies are present in the essential physical and human resources needed to conduct fundamental life-saving surgical procedures. These findings suggest potential areas for improvement in the delivery of emergency surgical care in the region.

Using Systems Engineering and Implementation Science to Design an Implementation Package for Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Among Older Adults Having Major Abdominal Surgery: Protocol for a 3-Phase Study.

Older Americans, a growing segment of the population, have an increasing need for surgical services, and they experience a disproportionate burden of postoperative complications compared to their younger counterparts. A preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (pCGA) is recommended to reduce risk and improve surgical care delivery for this population, which has been identified as vulnerable. The pCGA optimizes multiple chronic conditions and factors commonly overlooked in routine preoperative planning, including physical function, polypharmacy, nutrition, cognition, mental health, and social and environmental support. The pCGA has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in a variety of surgical specialties. Although national guidelines recommend the use of the pCGA, a paucity of strategic guidance for implementation limits its uptake to a few academic medical centers. By applying implementation science and human factors engineering methods, this study will provide the necessary evidence to optimize the implementation of the pCGA in a variety of health care settings. The purpose of this paper is to describe the study protocol to design an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package for use among older adults before major abdominal surgery. This protocol uses systems engineering methods to develop, tailor, and pilot-test a user-centered pCGA implementation package, which can be adapted to community-based hospitals in preparation for a multisite implementation trial. The protocol is based upon the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development and aligns with the goal to develop behavioral interventions with an eye to real-world implementation. In phase 1, we will use observation and interviews to map the pCGA process and identify system-based barriers and facilitators to its use among older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. In phase 2, we will apply user-centered design methods, engaging health care providers, patients, and caregivers to co-design a pCGA implementation package. This package will be applicable to a diverse population of older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a large academic hospital and an affiliate community site. In phase 3, we will pilot-test and refine the pCGA implementation package in preparation for a future randomized controlled implementation-effectiveness trial. We anticipate that this study will take approximately 60 months (April 2023-March 2028). This study protocol will generate (1) a detailed process map of the pCGA; (2) an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package ready for feasibility testing in a pilot trial; and (3) preliminary pilot data on the implementation and effectiveness of the package. We anticipate that these data will serve as the basis for future multisite hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trials of the pCGA in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. The expected results of this study will contribute to improving perioperative care processes for older adults before major abdominal surgery. DERR1-10.2196/59428.

Challenges and Opportunities in Accessing Surgery for Glioblastoma in Low-Middle Income Countries: A Narrative Review.

Glioblastoma: a highly aggressive brain tumor, presents substantial challenges in treatment and management, with surgical intervention playing a pivotal role in improving patient outcomes. Disparities in access to brain tumor surgery arise from a multitude of factors, including socioeconomic status, geographical location, and healthcare resource allocation. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face significant barriers to accessing surgical services, such as shortages of specialized neurosurgical expertise, limited healthcare infrastructure, and financial constraints. Consequently, glioblastoma patients in LMICs experience delays in diagnosis, suboptimal treatment, and poorer clinical outcomes compared to patients in high-income countries (HICs). The clinical impact of these disparities is profound. Patients in LMICs are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced disease stages, receive less effective treatment, and have lower survival rates than their counterparts in HICs. Additionally, disparities in access to surgical care exacerbate economic and societal burdens, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted interventions and health policy reforms to address healthcare inequities. This review highlights the importance of addressing global disparities in access to brain tumor surgery for glioblastoma through collaborative efforts, policy advocacy, and resource allocation, aiming to improve outcomes and promote equity in surgical care delivery for all glioblastoma patients worldwide.

Can Operating Room Design Make Orthopedic Surgeries Shorter, Safer, and More Efficient?: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

The study aimed to fill the knowledge gap about how operating room (OR) design could reduce orthopedic surgery duration and contribute to surgical care safety and efficiency. Long surgery duration may lead to delays and cancellations of surgeries, deteriorated patient experiences, postoperative complications, and waste of healthcare resources. The OR physical environment may contribute to the reduction of surgery duration by minimizing workflow disruptions and personnel movements during surgeries. Unobtrusive observations were conducted of 70 unilateral total knee or hip replacement surgeries in two differently designed ORs at a community hospital in the United States. A set of computer-based forms adapted from recent research was used to measure the surgery duration, environment-related disruptions, and ambulatory movements involving circulators. Potential confounding factors like surgery type were controlled in statistical analyses. Significantly shorter surgery durations were recorded in the larger OR with more clearances on both sides of the operating table, a wider door located on the sidewall, more cabinets, and more clearance between the circulator workstation and the sterile field (p =.019). The better-designed OR was also associated with less frequent disruptions and fewer movements per case (p < .001). Significant correlations existed between surgery duration, the number of disruptions, and the number of movements (rs = .576-.700, ps < .001). The study demonstrated the important role of OR physical environment in supporting the safe and efficient delivery of surgical care, which should be further enhanced through research and design innovations.

Digitizing operating theater data in resource-limited settings: Understanding surgical care delivery post-implementation at Tanzanian referral hospital.

Digitizing surgical data infrastructure is critical for policymakers to make informed decisions. The implementation of the first web-based operating theater (OT) recordings at Muhimbili Orthopedic Institute (MOI) represents significant advancements in data management for Tanzania. This study aims to share post-platform implementation outcomes, challenges, and insights gained offering guidance to settings facing similar data repository challenges. In July 2023, after training clinicians, the platform was deployed at MOI operating theaters (OTs) to facilitate prospective data entry following procedures, ensuring timely updates of perioperative outcomes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to gather insights into the platform's functionality and efficient data management systems. We presented data from August 2023 to February 2024 along with platform insights. Over 4449 procedures were conducted, comprising 1321 emergencies and 3128 electives, with orthopedics/trauma accounting for the majority (3606). Trauma-related emergencies (921) predominate among interventions. General anesthesia was prevalent; 60.56% in emergencies and 44.51% in electives. Orthopedics/trauma utilized 90.91% of assigned operating days in electives, while neurosurgery utilized 93.39% (p<0.011). The cancellation rate was 7.5%, primarily due to emergency interferences (32%). Of procedures, 96.76% were discharged, while 2.81% died. Challenges encountered during platform implementation included securing local support, integrating technology, and navigating administrative adjustments. Lessons learned emphasized continuous communication for stakeholder buy-in and training for platform familiarity. The web-based OT recordings at MOI succeeded with local support and showed promise for wider scalability. To ensure sustainability, ongoing follow-up, monitoring of platform functionality, local funding establishment, and strengthening global partnerships are recommended.

The safety and efficacy of ambulatory urologic surgery: A paradigm shift towards optimizing resource utilization in outpatient settings.

Amidst substantial surgical waitlists, novel methods are needed to improve the delivery of surgical care in Canada. One strategy involves shifting select surgeries from hospitals into community ambulatory centers, which expedite procedures and allow hospitals to prioritize critical and complex patients. We sought to evaluate surgical outcomes at a novel Canadian urologic clinic and surgical center. A retrospective study was conducted at a novel accredited surgical facility and outpatient ambulatory clinic from August 2022 to August 2023. Procedures ranged from scrotal and transurethral surgeries to inflatable penile prosthesis insertion. Traditional outpatient procedures, including vasectomy and cystoscopy, were excluded. All patients were discharged the same day and seen 4-6 weeks post-procedure. Variables of interest included surgery type, anesthesia administered, additional clinic appointments, unplanned family physician appointments, visits to the emergency department (ED), and hospital admissions. In a 12-month period, 519 surgeries were performed. The mean patient age was 49.6±17.3 years, with most classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-2 (88.8%). Most (95.8%, n=497) patients did not require medical care outside the clinic before scheduled followup; 2.5% (n=13) visited the ED presenting for wound concerns, postoperative pain, query infection, or catheter-related concerns. Only 1.7% (n=9) required an unscheduled appointment with their family physician, with concerns being inadequate postoperative pain management (n=4) or suspected infection (n=4). No patient required hospital admission. Many urologic surgeries classically performed in hospital operating rooms can be safely performed in a non-hospital, outpatient surgical facility with preservation of good outcomes. This strategy can potentially improve the efficiency of urologic healthcare delivery in select patients.

The Sustained Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Vascular Surgical Care Delivery

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated postponement of vascular surgery procedures nationally. Whether procedure volumes have since recovered remains undefined. Therefore, our objective was to quantify changes in procedure volumes and determine whether surgical volume has returned to its prepandemic baseline. This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study between 2018 and 2023 using the US Fee-for-Service Medicare 5% National Sample as part of the VA Disrupted Care National Project. We studied patients who underwent 1 of 3 procedures: abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair for intact aneurysms, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and major lower extremity amputation (LEA). The case volume of each quarter of 2020-2023 was compared to its corresponding prepandemic quarter in 2019. We then performed a subanalysis of these trends by sex, age, and race. We identified 21,031 procedures: 4,411 AAA repair, 8,361 CEA, and 8,259 LEA. The average percent change during the baseline prepandemic period from 2018 to 2019 was -4.3% for AAA repair, -8.5% for CEA, and -2.6% for LEA. Compared to Q2 of 2019, Q2 of 2020 demonstrated that AAA repair procedures decreased by 47%, CEA by 40%, and LEA by 14%. While procedures initially rebounded in Q3 of 2020, volumes did not return to their prepandemic baseline, demonstrating a persistent volume reduction (-16% AAA, -22% CEA, and -11% LEA). Thereafter, procedure counts again declined in Q1 of 2022 (-25% AAA, -34% CEA, and -25% LEA). Despite a perception that vascular surgical care was singularly disrupted at the outset of the pandemic, there has been a sustained reduction in vascular surgical volume since 2019. Not only have procedure volumes not returned to prepandemic baseline but it also appears that there has been a cumulative incremental impact on overall procedure volume. The impact of these findings on long-term population health remains uncertain and necessitates a better understanding of postpandemic care delivery.

Overcoming Geographic Barriers: Surgical Care in Rural Populations

AbstractThis chapter examines the challenges rural Americans face in accessing surgical care, which is characterized by geographical barriers, a decreasing surgical workforce, and unique patient factors. The widening health care disparity between rural and urban residents highlights the need for comprehensive strategies to improve surgical care delivery to rural areas. Focusing on colorectal care delivery, encompassing the spectrum of common and complex care, exemplifies opportunities to optimize care delivery for rural populations. Here, we discuss the complex and unique interplay of challenges within rural hospital infrastructure, workforce shortages, and patient factors emphasizing financial strain, closure of rural hospitals, and limited access to specialty providers and resources. Current evidence focuses on volume–outcome relationships, the safety of common surgical care at rural hospitals, and the impact of rural hospitals joining larger health systems. Strategies to optimize care delivery include site-of-care optimization, improved care coordination, dissemination of specialty expertise, and policy programs to support the rural workforce. Recent federal policies, including the rural emergency hospital program, underscore the delicate balance between sustaining essential local health care services and the financial realities of rural health care delivery. We then conclude with evidence-based strategies to bridge the urban-rural health care gap, ensuring equitable access to high-quality surgical care regardless of geographic location.

An analysis of virtual reality in abdominal surgery-A scoping review.

The integration of virtual reality (VR) in surgery has gained prominence as VR applications have increased in popularity. A scoping review was undertaken, gathering the most relevant sources, utilising a detailed literature search of medical and academic databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, IEEE, Google Scholar, and the Google search engine. Of the 18 articles included, 7 focused on VR in colon surgery, 5 addressed VR in pancreas surgery, and the remaining 6 concentrated on VR in liver surgery. All the articles concluded that VR has a promising future in abdominal surgery by facilitating precision, visualisation, and surgeon training. Adopting VR technology in abdominal surgery has the potential to improve preoperative planning, decrease perioperative anxiety among patients, and facilitate the training of surgeons, residents, and medical students. Additional supporting studies are necessary before VR can be widely implemented in surgical care delivery.

Consensus on topical issues of multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with frailty in planned surgical care delivery

The number of elderly and senile patients who are in need of surgical care delivery is growing steadily year over year. This category of patients is characterized by comorbidity, polypragmasy and high prevalence of geriatric syndromes including loss of autonomy, malnutrition and cognitive impairments that increase the risk of developing perioperative complications. Management of these patients at all stages requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach. Nevertheless, there is no uniform understanding of solution of this problem at present. Determination of consensus on certain issues using the Delphi method will allow to gather and unite expert opinions. In this regard, the working group formulated the main points of management of elderly and senile patients before, during and after surgical treatment and conducted a cross-sectional analysis of experts' opinions.

Clinical and economic justification of icg-cholangiography in «difficult» laparoscopic cholecystectomy

To prove from a clinical and economic point of view the expediency of using ICG cholangiography in patients with «difficult» laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the prevention of damage to the bile ducts. The results of treatment of 173 patients with cholelithiasis at various levels of health care providing were analyzed with regard to assessment of indicators of surgery complexity, developed complications and economic costs. The effectiveness of the original scale of «difficult» laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been proved. The financial and economic costs of treatment of patients with damage of biliary ducts and patients with cholelithiasis without development of complications have been analyzed and evaluated. A comparative description of financial costs for patients with «difficult» laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of ICG-cholangiography has been given. A program on care delivery for patients suffering from cholelithiasis in the conditions of region with regard to safety and economic effectiveness has been developed. The implementation of this program provides the minimization of postoperative complications and fatality at all levels of surgical care delivery. It has been established that a rational approach to reducing the number of biliary ducts damages is their prevention by prediction of «difficult» laparoscopic cholecystectomy and performance of such interventions in medical organizations of III level with the possibility of modern technologies use.

Unsupervised clustering analysis of trauma/non-trauma centers using hospital features including surgical care.

Injuries are a leading cause of death in the United States. Trauma systems aim to ensure all injured patients receive appropriate care. Hospitals that participate in a trauma system, trauma centers (TCs), are designated with different levels according to guidelines that dictate access to medical and research resources but not specific surgical care. This study aimed to identify patterns of injury care that distinguish different TCs and hospitals without trauma designation, non-trauma centers (non-TCs). We extracted hospital-level features from the state inpatient hospital discharge data in Washington state, including all TCs and non-TCs, in 2016. We provided summary statistics and tested the differences of each feature across the TC/non-TC levels. We then conducted 3 sets of unsupervised clustering analyses using the Partition Around Medoids method to determine which hospitals had similar features. Set 1 and 2 included hospital surgical care (volume or distribution) features and other features (e.g., the average age of patients, payer mix, etc.). Set 3 explored surgical care without additional features. The clusters only partially aligned with the TC designations. Set 1 found the volume and variation of surgical care distinguished the hospitals, while in Set 2 orthopedic procedures and other features such as age, social vulnerability indices, and payer types drove the clusters. Set 3 results showed that procedure volume rather than the relative proportions of procedures aligned more, though not completely, with TC designation. Unsupervised machine learning identified surgical care delivery patterns that explained variation beyond level designation. This research provides insights into how systems leaders could optimize the level allocation for TCs/non-TCs in a mature trauma system by better understanding the distribution of care in the system.

Association of Medicaid Expansion with Reduction in Racial Disparities in the Timely Delivery of up-front Surgical Care for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and time to surgery among patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC). Delays in surgery are associated to adverse outcomes. It is known that underrepresented minorities are more likely to experience treatment delays. Understanding the impact of Medicaid expansion on reducing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare delivery is critical. This was a population-based study including women ages 40-64 with stage I-II BC who underwent upfront surgery identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2017) residing in states that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis compared rates of delayed surgery (>90d from pathological diagnosis) according to time period (pre-expansion [2010-2013] and post-expansion [2014-2017]) and race/ethnicity (White vs. racial and ethnic minority), stratified by insurance type (private vs. Medicaid/uninsured). Secondary analyses included logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. All analyses were conducted among a cohort of patients in the non-expansion states as a falsification analysis. Finally, a triple-differences approach compared pre-expansion with the post-expansion trend between expansion and non-expansion states. Among Medicaid expansion states, 104,569 patients were included (50,048 pre- and 54,521 post-expansion). In the Medicaid/uninsured subgroup, Medicaid expansion was associated with a -1.8% point (95% CI -3.5% to -0.1, P =0.04) reduction of racial disparity in delayed surgery. Cox regression models demonstrated similar findings (adjusted DID hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI 1.05-1.21]). The falsification analysis showed significant racial disparity reduction among expansion states but not among non-expansion states, resulting in a triple-difference estimate of -2.5% points (95% CI -4.9% to -0.1%, P =0.04) in this subgroup. As continued efforts are being made to increase access to healthcare, our study demonstrates a positive association between Medicaid expansion and a reduction in the delivery of upfront surgical care, reducing racial disparities among patients with early-stage BC.

Delivery and Prioritization of Surgical Care in Canada During COVID-19: An Environmental Scan.

During COVID-19 healthcare systems had to make concessions to make room for the surge of COVID-19 patients requiring hospital and intensive care. Postponing surgeries was a common strategy; however, it is unclear how surgical care was delivered during this time of constraint. The objective of this study was to understand how surgical care was delivered and prioritized during the COVID-19 pandemic response. This was an environmental scan following the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health methodology. This study was conducted in Canada; a universal, publicly funded healthcare system. Evidence sources on policies pertaining to the provision of surgical care between January 2020 and October 2022 were obtained from ministries of health, health services agencies and publicly funded hospitals across all 10 provinces and three territories. We synthesized the evidence sources using framework analysis. We identified 205 evidence sources that described six themes about the provision of surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the cycle of postponement and resumption; guidelines for triaging and prioritizing surgical cases; Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC), and safety measures for surgical care during COVID-19, patient-centred care, and looking forward (recovery planning, leadership, and decision-making). This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how surgical care was disrupted and innovated during COVID-19 which can inform future strategies for providing effective and efficient surgical care during times of healthcare constraint.

Plastic Surgical Outreach to Low- and Middle-income Countries and Global Health Priorities: An Analysis of 96 Nongovernmental Organizations.

Conditions that are treated by surgery constitute a significant portion of the global burden of disease. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), allocation of resources toward the most cost-effective surgical procedures (essential surgery) and care delivery platforms is critical. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the plastic surgeons who work with them play a significant role in plastic surgical outreach to LMICs. However, it is unknown whether their work aligns with existing global public health recommendations. A previously established internet-based methodology was used to identify plastic surgical NGOs. Through direct correspondence with NGOs and publicly available data, plastic surgical NGOs were cataloged with respect to the subspecialty areas of plastic surgery performed, care delivery platforms, and geographic sites. These results were then compared with the existing global public health recommendations. A total of 96 NGOs met inclusion criteria. The most common subspecialty area was cleft surgery (80.3%), followed by pediatric plastic surgery (46.9%). No NGOs used a continuous care delivery platform. Instead, all NGOs used an intermittent model through short-term surgical missions, of which 62.8% used a nonrotating care model and returned to the same site(s) annually, whereas 37.2% used a rotating care model. Most NGOs perform cleft surgery, an area considered essential surgery, and thus, collectively, the work of NGOs largely aligns with global public health priorities. However, there is room for improvement for both the types of procedures performed and the care delivery platforms to provide the most cost-effective and sustainable care.

EGS P38 Audit of operative notes/ Clinical documentation of emergency laparotomy &amp; laparoscopic bowel resection procedures

Abstract Background Laparotomies and laparoscopic bowel resections are common emergency procedures carried out in General Surgery emergency theatres. Get It Right First Time (GIRFT), Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) and The Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) have made best practice recommendations for documenting operative notes, to ensure effective communication with colleagues and for medicolegal purposes. Ensuing medicolegal issues and patient complaints have cost departments in recent times, due to poor documentation. This audit within a busy General surgery unit, assesses the quality of operative documentations against the standards set by GIRFT, RCS and ASGBI. Methods A retrospective audit of operative notes and relevant clinical documentation of 100 emergency laparotomies and laparoscopic bowel resections between August 2022 and March 2023 at a local General surgery unit. Patient Identification Numbers were extracted from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database. Operative records and clinical documentations were obtained from electronic clinical records. The recommendations from the “GIRFT RCS and ASGBI Best Practice for Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Bowel Resection Surgery Documentation” guidance was used as the Standard. Up to 60 variables were assessed across different stages of the patient journey, from preoperative to intraoperative and postoperative stages. Results In the period reviewed, there was varying performance. Good performance in documentations of Indications, Operator names, patient position, incision, and findings, seen in 99, 100, 100, 100 and 100 percent of cases respectively. Anaesthetist name was documented in 48% of cases, whilst WHO checklist was documented in only 20% of cases. 64 of these cases had bowel resections. In this cohort, methods and location of resection was described in 95% of cases. Only 43% had the state of bowel prefusion at transection site documented. VTE prophylaxis, Antibiotics, sutures/clip plan, were documented in 87, 65 and 13 % of cases respectively. Conclusions The audit highlights deficits in important areas of documentation, despite the set guideline. Important medicolegal issues can arise when documentations are not clear, and steps considered routine as not written in the operative notes or patient’s records. The findings will be disseminated, and recommendations will be suggested across all grades of surgeons, with the aim to re-audit and improve quality of documentation and ultimately improve delivery of surgical care. A plan to have electronic documentation template or checklist for these procedures has been carried out for trial with the aim of developing standardised documentation process.

Impact of climate change on surgery: A scoping review to define existing knowledge and identify gaps

With climate change accelerated at a worrisome rate, global warming also will have implications for surgery and surgical practice. The goal of this current study was to systematically survey the literature and better understand how climate change has affected surgical disease burden, surgical care delivery, and surgical outcomes. We performed a comprehensive scoping review, screening 3334 unique citations from three databases – 1766 from Embase, 1329 from Pubmed and 239 from Scopus – to identify studies that had associated climate change with surgery. After systematic searching, quality appraisal, and data extraction, we synthesized findings from qualitative and quantitative studies. Twenty-six studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The studies associating climate change with surgery spanned all surgical subspecialties, although most notable examples came from urology, trauma surgery, and burns and reconstructive surgery. Although there is increasingly strong evidence for how climate change might affect surgery, there is a paucity of research attempting to establish a more direct correlation or causal link between the two. Additionally, we identified several studies that did not directly address climate change but instead focused on chronobiology and its effects on surgery, highlighting directions for future research. The existing evidence, despite its limitations, generates hypotheses for future work, implicating climate change as an independent contributor towards increased surgical disease burden, decreased surgical care delivery, and worsened surgical outcomes.

Virtual cardiac hospital in the home following cardiac surgery delivers superior patient outcomes, reduces costs, and increases bed availability

Abstract Introduction Increasing patient complexity and unprecedented bed access constraints are important challenges in contemporary delivery of post-operative cardiac surgical care. Bed constraints lead to inefficient ICU discharge, excessive hospital Length Of Stay (LOS), and ineffective transitional care which results in suboptimal patient experience and hospital readmissions. The Cardiac Hospital in the Home (cHITH) model was designed to provide an early supported discharge in a virtual ward environment by an expert team of advanced practice cardiac nurses, pharmacists and cardiologists. The model utilizes wearable technology to monitor cardiac rhythm, oxygen saturation and vital signs in conjunction with daily virtual ward rounds using a standard tele health platform. Care is focused on coaching around mobilization and medical therapy, detection and management of complications and liaison with community pharmacies and providers of sub acute care. Escalation pathways for clinical deterioration were designed to support patient safety. Results Between March and October 2022, 123 of 197 patients were referred to cHITH of whom 103 (84%) were recruited. Where appropriate, results were compared with those from the same calendar period in 2021 and dichotomized to detect early trends in care. The cHITH group had a mean age of 62 ± 4 years with 82% males, 62% underwent isolated CABG surgery and there were no mortalities. Compared with historical results, inpatient LOS was reduced 1.6 days with 35% of care delivered in the virtual cardiac hospital. Readmission at 30 days was reduced by 42% (p&amp;lt;0.05)* and patient satisfaction was &amp;gt;90% (net promoter score). Important trends included an increase in cHITH LOS and a reduction in Total LOS. Projections Modelling of total hospital costs and bed-day savings was performed using real data from the medical centre. Assuming that 75% of patients would be managed in the cHITH for 3.5 days, the projected cost of cHITH care was $24.2M comparing favorably with $27.8M for usual care. When readmitted days are subtracted from total virtual care days the cHITH model of care is projected to save 975 inpatient bed days. Conclusions This virtual model of care has demonstrated safety, efficiency and high levels of patient satisfaction. Ongoing analysis is required to understand the broader applications of this model and to further evaluate quality, safety and efficiency metrics.Table 1.Results